Focal cortical dysplasia: Molecular disturbances and clinicopathological classification (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Monika Siedlecka
    • Wiesława Grajkowska
    • Ryszard Galus
    • Bożenna Dembowska-Bagińska
    • Jarosław Jóźwiak
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 29, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2760
  • Pages: 1327-1337
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is one of the most important causes of drug-resistant epilepsy in paediatric patients, particularly in those below the age of 3. Even though over 40 years have passed since the first description of the entity by Taylor, the exact mechanisms causing these cortical abnormalities remain unelucidated. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on clinical and histopathological aspects, taking into account the new classification system proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy. We focus on the clinicopathological associations and differences in post-surgical outcome among FCD subtypes, in particular isolated FCD vs. FCD associated with principal lesions, which have not been summarised to date. We also recapitulate genetic studies, pointing to the possible mechanisms of the cortical dysregulation and drug resistance, and summarise novel factors which may contribute to epileptogenesis in FCD. Furthermore, we compare FCD type IIB (FCDIIB) with brain tumours found in a neurocutaneous disorder, tuberous sclerosis, as we evaluate the hypothesis that FCD IIB may be a local form of this disease.

1. Introduction

Malformations of cortical development (MCDs) play a major role in the aetiology of epilepsy. One of the MCD subtypes, focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), is particularly important as a frequent cause of epilepsy resistant to drugs, as approximately one half (46.5%) of patients with epilepsy has some form of this pathology (1). The disorder is the result of neuronal migration, proliferation and differentiation disruption during brain development, leading to regional cortical lamination, neuronal maturation and differentiation abnormalities. The first description of FCD in resected specimens from 10 patients treated surgically for refractory epilepsy was made by Taylor et al in 1971 (2). Taylor described FCD as a malformative disorganisation and dyslamination of the neocortex with the presence of giant, dysmorphic neurones and bizarre 'balloon cells', similar to giant cells in tuberous sclerosis (TS). Since then, the classification of FCD has changed, distinguishing architectural dysplasias with or without the presence of dysmorphic neurons or balloon cells (Taylor cells). None of these, however, have met the requirements of clinical practice. Additionally, some neurodevelopmental studies have shed light on the possibility of postnatal neurogenesis failure due to various pathogenic states of the brain (dysmature cerebral developmental hypothesis) as the background of epileptogenesis (3). Against this background, an ad hoc Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), the Diagnostic Methods Commission, have proposed a new clinicopathological classification system to help clinical practice (4). The ILAE consensus classification included both isolated and associated FCD variants (Table I) and its recent evaluation showed good inter- and intra-observer agreement (5).

Table I

Characteristics of FCD types in the ILAE classification system (25).

Table I

Characteristics of FCD types in the ILAE classification system (25).

ILAE consensus classification system for FCDs
FCD I: CorticaldyslaminationFCD IA: FCD with abnormal radial cortical lamination
 • Abundant microcolumnar organization
FCD IB: FCD with abnormal tangential cortical lamination
 • Failure to establish a six-layered tangential composition of the isocortex
 • Less clear demarcation of white/grey matter transition
 • Cellular abnormalities (immature neurons, hypertrophic pyramidal neurons outside layer 5, disoriented dendrites)
FCD IC: FCD with abnormal radial and tangential cortical lamination
FCD II: Cortical dyslamination with dysmorphic neuronsFCD IIA: FCD with dysmorphic neurons, without balloon cells
 • Dysmorphic neurons
 • Cortical dyslamination (only layer 1 is identifiable)
 • Usually blurred grey/white matter transition
FCD IIB: FCD with dysmorphic neurons and balloon cells
 • Balloon cells
 • Dysmorphic neurons
 • Intermediate cells (cells of glial and neuronal features)
 • Cortical dyslamination
 • Blurred grey/white matter transition
 • Usually reduced myelin content in the underlying white matter
FCD III: Cortical laminationabnormalitiesrelated to additionalpathology (in theadjoining area)FCD IIIA: Cortical lamination abnormalities in the temporal lobe associated with hippocampal sclerosis
 • Patient with hippocampal sclerosis (HS; Ammon's horn sclerosis) plus:
 • Alterations of cytoarchitectural composition or temporal lobe sclerosis
FCD IIIB: Cortical lamination abnormalities (dyslamination, hypertrophic neurons, cortical hypoplasia) adjacent to a glial or glioneuronal tumor
FCD IIIC: Cortical lamination abnormalities adjacent to vascular malformation
FCD IIID: Cortical lamination abnormalities adjacent to any other lesion acquired during early life (e.g., traumatic brain injury, glial scarring after ischaemia or haemorrhage, inflammatory or infectious diseases, which were not included in types IIIA-C)
FCD III NOS (not otherwise specified): Focal cortical dysplasia associated with clinically suspected principal lesion, but lesion not available for histopathological examination

[i] ILAE, International League Against Epilepsy; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; HS, hippocampal sclerosis.

2. Aetiology and pathophysiology

The aetiology and pathogenesis of FCD is still uncertain; however, many histopathological and molecular findings point to abnormal neuronal and glial proliferation and migration processes (see below). Several hypotheses for FCD II have been proposed. The extrinsic damage hypothesis postulates that the damage to the developing brain is made by extrinsic factors, such as ischemia, hypoxia or toxins. Alternative somatic mutation hypothesis points to a mutant cortical progenitor cell to produce a clonal population of abnormal cells, forming FCD lesions (6). The latter hypothesis seems convincing, as FCD lesions have a characteristic funnel-shaped morphological distribution, typical of clonally-related neurons, as well as the co-expression of glial and neuronal antigens in different combinations, in balloon cells and dysmorphic neurons in FCD specimens (7). Some studies have also suggested that FCD lesions originate from the abnormal retention of pre-plate cells in the subplate and marginal zones, as the consequence of the partial failure of events during late corticogenesis (3,8).

The recent study by Rossini et al (9) on the layer-specific gene expression in FCD II, revealed the presence of hidden cortical laminations among normal-looking neurons, but not dysmorphic neurons or balloon cells, which may suggest that only selected precursor cells could be subjected to damage during cortical development.

Recently, a number of proteins involved in the regulation of cortical development has been observed to be deregulated and the cellular distribution alterations of these proteins have been found in FCD specimens. Among these proteins are: bone morphogenic protein-4, whose expression has been found to be reduced and altered in FCD IIB and cortical tubers from TS (10); the increased expression of doublecortin-like protein, found within the dysplastic cortex of FCD IIB and cortical tubers from TS (11); a study on the expression and distribution of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-2 receptors (IL-2R) and the downstream factors of the IL-2 signalling pathway revealed higher IL-2 and IL-2R levels in the FCD samples vs. the control and in FCD II vs. FCD I, as well as increased levels of Janus kinases 1 and 3 in FCD (12).

The new theory of FCD pathogenesis, based on HPV16 infection and HPV16 oncoprotein E6 expression in the developing foetal brain, has been postulated by Chen et al (13). They demonstrated for the first time the presence of HPV16 E6 oncoprotein in FCD IIB specimens and in the human brain in general. The 100% association of HPV16 infection with FCD IIB in 50 samples resected from patients with intractable epilepsy was demonstrated; however, the authors did not find the presence of HPV16 in other types of FCD, as such an association was found only in balloon cells. In addition, the functional correlation between HPV16 E6 oncoprotein expression and focal cortical malformation development associated with enhanced mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) signalling in an animal model was demonstrated. A similar study by Liu et al, detecting HPV16 and three other viral species: cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and human herpes virus in FCD IIA, seems to support these data (14). Furthermore, it is already known that all the above-mentioned viruses are able to activate the mTOR pathway (15), which is also implicated in FCD pathogenesis. In spite of these findings, whether we can classify FCD as a viral pathology, remains uncertain, particularly, as some data contradicting this hypothesis have been published (16). It is generally known that extensive cortical malformations can be caused by prenatal infections (e.g., TORCH spectrum syndromes); however, whether more localised malformation, such as FCD may result from intrauterine infections, warrants further investigation.

3. Molecular and genetic studies

The most convincing data point to mTOR cascade abnormalities, as the cause of FCD. Some authors have suggested TS complex 1 (TSC1) gene involvement in FCD pathogenesis. Amino acid polymorphisms of hamartin (TSC1 gene product), involving exons 5 and 17, and silent base substitution in exons 14 and 22, are more frequent in FCD in comparison to controls. In addition, the loss of TSC1 heterozygosity has been reported. Hamartin, forming a complex with tuberin encoded by the TS complex 2 (TSC2) gene, is a negative regulator of mTOR. TSC1/TSC2 mutations, or sequence alterations, lead to the loss of hamartin/tuberin protein complex activity which, in consequence, enables mTOR cascade activation, cell growth and proliferation, in response to diverse external or intracellular signals (17,18) (Fig. 1). The activation of upstream signalling pathways, e.g., protein kinase B or AKT (PKB) and exracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) pathways, results in mTOR upregulation; there are some reports on AKT pathway activation in balloon cells and, recently, one study on ERK hyperactivation in FCD IIB has been published (1921). It has also been recently suggested that FCD may be caused by de novo somatic mutations of mTOR occurring during brain development (22).

It is unlikely that FCD could be connected with only one gene mutation. The alterations of Notch and Wnt pathway proteins, which are involved in neurogenesis, neuroglial cell fate determination, neuronal migration and neural tube development, have been shown to be altered as well. The study by Cotter et al found elevated levels of disheveled and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) proteins, the absence of Notch-1 protein and alterations in β-catenin levels, with decreased levels of nuclear β-catenin in balloon cells (23) (Fig. 2).

As only polymorphysms or allelic TSC variants have been shown in FCD, and no disease-causing mutations of TSC genes, as well as no signalling pathway alterations specific for FCD, it is currently unjustifiable to use histopathological staining in FCD diagnoses. Such studies, however, could extend our knowledge on genetic disturbances in FCD, bringing new diagnostic options in the future.

4. Cytopathology and epileptogenesis

Balloon cells in FCD IIB have glial features and seem to arise from radial glial stem cells (3). For this reason, there is a supposition of the aberrant differentiation of these cells or possible pluripotency, with the abnormal destination of the cell (10). In addition, cell markers indicating immaturity and developmental abnormality, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), nestin, vimentin, CD133, CD34 are all expressed in balloon cells (7,24). Moreover, dysmorphic neurons exhibit a strong expression of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated neurofilament proteins, maturity markers, including NeuN, as well as cell markers pointing to cell immaturity or abnormalities in development or survival (7,8,25). The above-mentioned data support the idea that the neuronal as opposed to the glial differentiation of these cells is disrupted.

The specific morphology of balloon cells may be a result of uptriggered cellular pathways. mTOR, the central regulator of the cellular state, is a kinase responsible for the production of even 5–10% of all proteins in the cell. mTOR upregulation has been consistently found in balloon cells, which may contribute to their volume. A similar phenomenon has also been described in seemingly identical giant cells found in TS, where mTOR upregulation results usually from ERK hyperactivity (26).

Balloon cells are unable to generate epileptic discharges. They lack dendritic spines and axons, and have a very high input resistance. The newest findings suggest even their protective anti-seizure role by glutamate neutralisation, as glutamine synthetase immunopositivity in these cells, but not in dysmorphic neurons, was shown (27). On the other hand, cytomegalic neurons exhibit very low input resistance and atypical hyperexcitable properties of the intrinsic membrane, which allows the cells to generate repeated spikes after reaching firing threshold (28,29).

Several mechanisms leading to neuronal hyperexcitability and epilepsy in FCD have been postulated. There is evidence of both decreased inhibition and increased stimulation states, including the overexpression of NMDA and AMPA receptor subunits in FCD neurons, the loss of GABAergic neurons, differential composition of GABA receptor subunits, altered GABAA responses in paediatric cortical dysplasia (similar to immature cortex), as well as the dysfunction of the synaptic inhibition of pyramidal neurons due to disordered migration and the maldistribution of interneurons (3,30,31). In addition, the deregulation of cation-chloride cotransporter expression: Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter (NKCC1) and K+-Cl cotransporter (KCC2), has been observed in FCD tissue (32), while other studies point to post-translational voltage potassium channel (Kv4.2) modifications (33). The authors suggested that the abnormal expression of these cotransporters in neuronal and glial cells may contribute to increased network excitability, as their distribution is comparable to the immature cortex. It is, however, not certain as to whether this finding actively contributes to epileptogenesis in FCD and other malformations of cortical development. Finally, the activation of various inflammatory pathways connected with cells of microglial/macrophage lineage has been observed in FCD as well (34).

5. Clinical presentation

In recent years, as the entity recognition increased, rare, as it was thought, FCD became one of the most frequent pathologies in paediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment (35). It is the most prevalent lesion found in paediatric patients undergoing epilepsy surgery and is one of the three most common lesions in adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery (35,36). Its prevalence in patients with epilepsy patients has not been ascertained. In a summary prepared by Spreafico and Blümcke, based on the European Epilepsy Brain Bank and German Reference Center for Epilepsy surgery, among 748 patients with intractable epilepsy or histopathologically confirmed MCDs, FCDs constitute >75%, with FCD IIB being the most frequent (>39%) (37).

FCDs may affect any part of the brain cortex, varying in size and location. Clinically, the most frequent symptom of FCD is drug-refractory epilepsy, beginning in most cases, in early childhood. Adult-onset epilepsy in most studies is limited to several cases (38,39). Seizures are generally of high frequency, up to dozens a day (40) and can be localised or generalise secondarily. A recent study comparing the characteristics of patients with FCD and epilepsy onset in the first year showed that the presence epileptic spasms is connected with the frontal lobe localisation of the lesion (41). The same study also found that patients with focal seizures and epileptic spasms have an earlier epilepsy onset compared to those with only partial seizures. The early onset of seizures is also presumed to be associated with the posterior localisation of the lesion, compared to other sitings (42). A recent FCD II subgroup analysis pointed out that FCD IIB patients have an earlier epilepsy onset in comparison with FCD IIA patients. Subtype IIB was observed predominantly in the frontal lobe and subtype IIA was more often observed in the temporal lobe (40). In cases where cortical lamination abnormalities co-exist with the principal lesion, such as glial or glioneuronal tumours (FCD IIIB), the frequency of seizures reaches 100%, particularly when the tumour is slow-growing (43). In addition, male predominance and a higher seizure frequency in tumours associated with FCDs compared to solitary tumours has been noted (44).

The clinical consequences of FCD are also congnitive impairment and neurological deficits, as well as a decrease in intelligence quotient (IQ) in the majority of patients (42). It is thought that the grade of this deficit and the clinical manifestations of the disorder correlate with lesion localisation, size as well as subtype. In the study by Widdess-Walsh et al, cognitive impairment was observed more often in FCD II (42). Moreover, the study by Krsek et al showed that 96% of FCD I patients had mental retardation, with 55% of patients retarded severely (IQ <35), while in FCD II, the proportion was 67 and 27%, respectively (45). Patients with FCD I also exhibit higher maladaptive scales, whilst behavioural disorders due to brain dysfunction are not observed in FCD II patients at all. Psychiatric features have been observed to be connected with the early onset and the posterior localisation of the lesion. A minor delay in development and normal development are associated with patients with more circumscribed lesions. Early onset is more frequently associated with mild to severe mental retardation and more often leads to adverse outcomes in comparison with adult-onset seizures (46).

6. Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging studies allow the separation of FCD IIB from other cortical dysplasias. The indicative features are local cortical thickening, blurring of the white-grey matter interface and the focally increased signal of the subcortical white matter on T2-weighted imaging, often tapering toward the underlying ventricle ('transmantle sign'-nearly unique for FCD IIB) (47).

As the neuroimaging techniques became more advanced and precise, the identification of the lesion is more prevalent and classification is easier. Still, however, there are cases with pathologically proven FCD without any abnormalities in neuroimaging studies.

The recent study by Colombo et al, reviewing retrospectively MR images of 118 FCD II patients, showed that the MRI abnormalities were present in 79% of cases, whilst the correct diagnosis of FCD II, made on the basis of abnormal MRI scans, was made in 89% of patients. A strong correlation between the transmantle sign and FCD IIB was emphasised (48). Recently, Mühlebner et al pointed to some quantitative parameters, which may be useful for the higher sensitivity of MRI evaluation in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (49). Other recent studies have demonstrated the predominance of morphometric MRI analysis as more sensitive for FCD II detection than conventional visual analysis alone (50). Lately, the Arterial Spin Labeling MRI technique, evaluating the cerebral perfusion abnormalities during interictal periods, turned out to be helpful in the evaluation of epileptic zones in FCD patients (51). Furthermore, novel techniques of ShearWave elastography and magnetoencephalography have been demonstrated to detect MRI-negative FCD lesions, facilitating presurgical evaluation (52). Finally, in uncertain situations, functional neuroimaging techniques, including ictal SPECT or FDG-PET, are used.

7. Treatment

FCD treatment depends on individual patient presentation and remains mainly symptomatic, including cognitive and neurological deficit therapy, as well as epilepsy management. As epilepsy in FCD is commonly pharmacoresistant, and the basis of the resistance seem to be multifactorial, anti-epileptic treatment is particularly challenging, and should reflect different therapeutic strategies.

One of these strategies involves well-known mediators of drug resistance: multidrug resistance gene-1 P-glycoprotein (MDR1) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1). These participate in the formation of blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood-brain barriers, and in FCD lesions they have been found to be overexpressed in many brain tissue components of the epileptogenic zone (53). They have been found to be most frequently expressed in glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive balloon cells (glial type) and microtubule-associated protein 2-positive balloon cells (neuronal type) (54). In addition, major vault protein, a protein associated with drug resistance, was found to be upregulated in dysmorphic neurons in FCD (55). Therefore, in order to design the treatment for drug-resistant seizures, specific knowledge on the above-mentioned proteins seems to be of uttermost significance.

Secondly, mTOR pathway inhibitors may be a novel targeted therapeutic option for epilepsy in FCD. Due to mTOR signalling dysregulation, FCD is sometimes termed 'mTORopathy'. As the mTOR pathway is involved in protein synthesis, its activity abnormalities may promote neurotransmitter receptor or ion channel alterations and, consequently, neuronal hiperexcitability, leading to epileptogenesis (at least in animal models) (56,57). mTOR inhibitors, such as rapamycin or everolimus, are used in the treatment of another 'mTORopathy', TS. Their potential anti-epileptogenic and disease-modifying effects have been described and their learning deficit-reversing activity has been demonstrated in a mouse model (58,59). Finally, other recent studies, pointing to the link between FCD and HPV16, may also, potentially, identify some novel therapeutic strategies for the prevention of FCD (13). Molecular and genetic studies, however, are still required and should bring new concepts of efficient therapies.

At the moment, the treatment of choice for epileptogenic, drug-resistant lesions, is surgical resection. Its long-term efficacy and safety in certain ILAE classification subgroups is evaluated in order to determine the associations between pathological subtypes and clinical relevance and prognosis. Particularly, type III FCD and its post-surgical outcome needs to be evaluated according to the new classification, as it was not specified previously.

Surgical resection of the epileptic lesion may not only liberate patients from seizures, but also has a positive effect on cognition and intellectual outcomes, improving full-scale IQ (60). Early surgical intervention in children with complete resection of the epileptogenic lesion seems to be of particular importance. If accomplished before two years of seizure duration, it not only leads to better seizure control, but it also improves cognitive function development and quality of life (61).

Failure to achieve a seizure-free state is often due to incomplete cortical resection. However, a recent study by Wagner et al showed that subcortical hyperintense zone resection is not essential for a positive post-operative outcome, which may reduce the risk of surgery (62), whilst according to the study by Mühlebner et al, complete resection of the lesion is the only predictor of surgical outcome, irrespective of the ILAE subtype (63). Other predictors of surgical outcome are also pre-operative seizure frequency, pre-operative ability of epileptogenic focus localisation in imaging techniques, multilobar lesion and dual pathology presence (64).

8. Clinicopathological associations and outcome

As a series of factors affects epilepsy surgery outcomes, it is hard to compare particular studies to one another. The probability of being free from seizures ranges in different studies, and on average, seizure recurrence affects approximately one half of patients treated surgically (6568). Seizure outcome depends, however, on the time after surgery, and Kapplan-Meier curves (in the above-mentioned and other similar studies) analysis points at the highest epilepsy recurrence frequency within the first 3 years after surgery. A recent study by Ryzi et al (69) showed however, that approximately 30% of patients with seizure recurrence within one year after surgery remained seizure-free in a long term observation (at least 5 years) and the next 18% has auras only. Such data are, though, only general predictions for the patient, and recently, Jehi et al elaborated some nomograms for individualised predictions of post-surgical seizure outcome (66).

The seizure-free post-operative outcome rate in FCD varies in different reports and the proportion ranged from approximately 50 to 83% in a recent study by Tassi et al (70). The meta-analysis by Rowland et al (71) presented freedom from seizures in 58% of patients out of a group of over 2,000 patients with FCD-related epilepsy. The result is not, however, stable in time. According to Mrelashvili et al (65) about one third of patients has early seizure recurrence (<3 months), with a median recurrence time of 38 months.

As far as FCD subtypes associated with principal lesions are concerned, their clinical presentation seems to have similar characteristics to epilepsy associated with isolated principal lesions, as well as at least similar (and often better) outcomes, in comparison to isolated FCD I cases (44,7276). According to the most recent study by Fauser et al (77), there are no statistical differences in the outcome in FCD I, II and IIIA patients. The rate of (Engel's) class I post-operative results (i.e., patient free of disabling seizures) in this largest FCD patient cohort reported to date, was 65% after one year, and remained stable over time. The authors also noted higher numbers of febrile seizures and auras in FCD IIIA, compared to FCD I and II, which is also supported by the literature (72,76).

In another recent study by Giulioni et al (75), patients with hippocampal sclerosis associated with FCD I (i.e., FCD IIIA) showed a similar seizure outcome to patients with isolated hippocampal sclerosis (84 vs. 82%, respectively) and had better seizure outcome than patients with isolated FCD I (63%). FCD IIIA was also the most common pathology. Aforegoing and other similar findings [e.g., Thom et al (80) or Tassi et al (78,79)] are in contrast with the controversial results obtained recently by Johnson et al (81). In the study by Johnson et al, FCD IIIA had the poorest seizure outcome, compared to major pathologies: isolated hippocampal sclerosis (HS) and isolated tumours, and similar to temporal FCD I. The presented data contradict the ILAE classification. However, there was similar electro-clinical presentation between FCD IIIA and HS, taking into account e.g., the frequency of seizures, the age of epilepsy onset or the presence of auras. In the letter to the editor, Giulioni et al commented on this study critically (73).

Other associated FCD subtypes also seem to have a good prognosis. Santos et al (75) pointed to a very good seizure outcome of FCD IIIB (Engel I rate of 87%) following appropriate surgical resection. In their study, a better outcome was connected with the extended resection of the tumour and the whole area of epileptogenicity. Another study by Cossu et al (44) compared the outcome between associated and isolated forms of FCD, finding that the solitary FCD I outcome is worse than FCD IIIB or FCD II associated with tumours (47 vs. 83 vs. 76%, respectively). The clinical characteristics and outcome in tumour-associated FCDs in that study was more similar to the cases of solitary tumour than FCD I, which is consistent with results obtained by the above-mentioned authors (74,7880).

There is not much information on the outcome in FCD IIIC and FCD IIID subtypes. One of the latest studies suggests that FCD IIIC differs from the other FCD III subtypes (76). In that study, the mean age of epilepsy in FCD III C was higher than in other FCD III types and was similar to that of vascular malformations in the temporal lobe. The duration of epilepsy in FCD III B and III C was shorter than that in other associated types. The characteristics of epilepsy in these subtypes were similar to the seizures associated with isolated principal lesions.

Little is known about the clinicopathological associations of FCD IIID. In one study (76) on a group of FCD IIID patients, six had traumatic brain injury, three patients had glial scarring after perinatal ischaemic injury, and two patients underwent infections. The mean age of epilepsy onset in this group was 14 years and the seizure frequency was not higher than in other subtypes. There is, unfortunately, no information on seizure outcome in these patients.

As far as FCD I and II is concerned, there is much literature on prognosis in these subtypes, as it had been present in previous classifications. The study by Simpson and Prayson, taking into consideration the ILAE classification, including the new FCD IC subtype, did not reveal any differences in Engel I rate after surgery, which was 48%, in all three FCD I subtypes (82). The outcome in FCD II cases is better, it fluctuates between 50–88% (40,71). There is a higher seizure outcome in FCD IIB, compared to FCD IIA, and there is no correlation between outcome and age at onset or the duration of epilepsy (71).

To sum up these findings, FCD III outcome is rather similar to that in isolated principal lesions connected with particular subtypes and seems distinct from FCD I and II. In particular, the difference between a relatively good seizure outcome in FCD IIIA and a worse outcome in isolated FCD I suggests that in FCD III, the principal lesion is a very important factor of the outcome. A summary of the largest recent studies on the post-surgical seizure outcome in epilepsy due to FCD and other causes is presented in Table II.

Table II

Post-surgical seizure outcome in epilepsy due to FCD and other causes, in recent studies (40,44,64,67,68,70,71,75,87–90).

Table II

Post-surgical seizure outcome in epilepsy due to FCD and other causes, in recent studies (40,44,64,67,68,70,71,75,87–90).

Authors/(Refs.)Post-surgical seizure outcome in FCD (regarding FCD subtype)
Surgical outcome
Engel I class: % of PTS
Follow-up data
Fauser et al (77)Total: 65
FCD I: 61
FCD II: 67
FCD IIIA: 65
5-year follow-up; outcome stable over time
Simpson and Prayson (82)FCD I: 48Median follow-up: 63 months (32–93 months);
Total follow-up of all the patients: 58 months
Yao et al (40)FCD IIA: 50
FCD IIB: 75
Mean follow-up: 2.5 years
Santos et al (75)FCD IIIB: 875-year follow-up
Cossu et al (44)FCD I: 47
FCD II: 84
FCD II + tumour 76
FCD IIIB: 83
No data on mean follow-up available
Giulioni et al (74)FCD I: 63
HS: 82
FCD IIIA: 84
Mean follow-up: 6 years
Tassi et al (70)Total: 83
FCDIIA: 74
FCD IIB: 88
Mean follow-up: 81 months; very rare seizure recurrences
Tassi et al (78)Isolated FCD I: 46
FCD I + HS: 82
FCD I + tumour: 82
At least 2-year follow-up

Authors/(Refs.)General post-surgical seizure outcome in epilepsy
Surgical outcome: %Follow-up and other information

Jehi et al (66)Baseline risk of seizure freedom: 0.52 at 2 years, 0.4 at 5 years;
Baseline risk of Engel I score: 0.69 at 2 years, 0.62 at 5 years.
27% of studied patients had MCD-related epilepsy;
Median follow up: 3.3 years
Mrelashvili et al (65)Engel I: 53
Engel I/II: 21
Engel III/IV: 26
Early recurrence: 32
Median recurrence: 38 months
FCD-related epilepsy;
Median time to last follow up: 13.5 months;
Simasathien et al (68)Engel I: 57
Overall seizure-free probability:
After 1 year: 66
After 2 years: 52
After 5 years: 33
59% of studied patients had MCD-related frontal lobe epilepsy;
mean follow up: 4.3 years;
Bulacio et al (67)Ovarall seizure-free probability:
After 1 year: 61
After 5 years: 42
After 10 years: 33
Various causes of epilepsy were taken into consideration
Comparable results in the group with cortical dysplasia only

[i] FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; HS, hippocampal sclerosis; MCD, malformation of cortical development; PTS, patients.

9. FCD IIB: local form of tuberous sclerosis?

Taylor et al observed a histological similarity between FCD and TS, and postulated it to be an attenuate or atypical form of TS (2). Nowadays, after over 40 years, this issue is still under investigation, and it is sometimes assumed that FCD IIB may be a local form of TS (83,84).

Histomorphologically, balloon cells found in FCD and giant cells in TS are similar (85). Common TS brain lesions, subependymal giant cell tumour (SGCT), subependymal nodules and cortical tubers, as well as FCD IIB lesions express both neuronal and glial characteristics (7,86). This suggests that the above lesions originate from progenitor, undifferentiated cells, which either remain undifferentiated or tend to pursue one of three possible directions: differentiation as neuronal cells, glial (astrocytic) cells or cells of mixed glio-neuronal features (24,86). Immunohistochemical studies on balloon and giant cells have shown the expression of the same markers (e.g., CD34, nestin, wimentin, GFAP and doublecortin) (86,87). In addition, a strong MDR-1 and MRP-1 immunoreactivity was shown to be present in giant and other tuber cells of TS epileptogenic lesions, which (similarly to FCD), can possibly explain the drug resistance of epilepsy (88).

Apart from immunohistochemical markers, there are other molecular and morphological similarities between brain tumours in TS and FCD IIB. It is already known that mutations or genetic alterations of TSC1 and TSC2 suppressor genes are involved in the pathogenesis of both TS and FCDIIB (17,89). Both TS and FCD are mTORopathies, as the development of balloon and giant cells probably results from mTOR activation. Recent studies point also to apoptosis signalling pathways and the activation of neurodegeneration in both FCD II and TS (90), as well as at the defect in autophagy, both in balloon cells in FCD and TS cells, connected with abnormal mTOR activation and reversible by mTOR inhibition (91,92). Indeed, mTOR is responsible for the control over protein translation, and mTOR activation leads to hypertrophy of the cell (93). Thus, morphological similarity between balloon and giant cells may be a sign of mTOR activation.

The recent study by Kotulska et al also revealed the clinical association between TSC presentation and FCD presence. Patients with FCD have more severe epilepsy with higher drug-resistance as well as more severe mental retardation (94).

The above similarities suggest that both TS and FCD IIB may be pathogenically identical malformations, with FCD IIB being focal form of TS in CNS. However, in order to make a consistent statement, further molecular and genetic studies are required.

10. Conclusions

In the present review, we discuss different forms of FCD, specifying the similarities and differences between them. In light of recent findings, we also describe the molecular mechanisms leading to the development of the lesion e.g., the most convincing data point to mTOR cascade abnormalities, as the cause of FCD. As far as clinicopathological associations and outcome are concerned, we review current data, while focusing on the outcome data for FCD III, which has not been summarised to date, at least to the best of our knowledge. Finally, we describe why FCD IIB is sometimes known as the local form of TS, and what are the similarities between the two entities.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grant no. 231/14 from the Childrens' Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

References

1 

Bingaman WE: Surgery for focal cortical dysplasia. Neurology. 62(Suppl 3): S30–S34. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Taylor DC, Falconer MA, Bruton CJ and Corsellis JA: Focal dysplasia of the cerebral cortex in epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 34:369–387. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Cepeda C, André VM, Levine MS, Salamon N, Miyata H, Vinters HV and Mathern GW: Epileptogenesis in pediatric cortical dysplasia: The dysmature cerebral developmental hypothesis. Epilepsy Behav. 9:219–235. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Blümcke I, Thom M, Aronica E, Armstrong DD, Vinters HV, Palmini A, Jacques TS, Avanzini G, Barkovich AJ, Battaglia G, et al: The clinicopathologic spectrum of focal cortical dysplasias: A consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission. Epilepsia. 52:158–174. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Coras R, de Boer OJ, Armstrong D, Becker A, Jacques TS, Miyata H, Thom M, Vinters HV, Spreafico R, Oz B, et al: Good interobserver and intraobserver agreement in the evaluation of the new ILAE classification of focal cortical dysplasias. Epilepsia. 53:1341–1348. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Crino PB, Miyata H and Vinters HV: Neurodevelopmental disorders as a cause of seizures: Neuropathologic, genetic, and mechanistic considerations. Brain Pathol. 12:212–233. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Englund C, Folkerth RD, Born D, Lacy JM and Hevner RF: Aberrant neuronal-glial differentiation in Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasia (type IIA/B). Acta Neuropathol. 109:519–533. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Andres M, Andre VM, Nguyen S, Salamon N, Cepeda C, Levine MS, Leite JP, Neder L, Vinters HV and Mathern GW: Human cortical dysplasia and epilepsy: An ontogenetic hypothesis based on volumetric MRI and NeuN neuronal density and size measurements. Cereb Cortex. 15:194–210. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Rossini L, Medici V, Tassi L, Cardinale F, Tringali G, Bramerio M, Villani F, Spreafico R and Garbelli R: Layer-specific gene expression in epileptogenic type II focal cortical dysplasia: Normal-looking neurons reveal the presence of a hidden laminar organization. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2:452014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Guo W, Zhang CQ, Shu HF, Yang MH, Yin Q and Yang H: Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-4 in the cortical lesions of focal cortical dysplasia IIb and the tuberous sclerosis complex. J Mol Neurosci. 50:7–13. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Boer K, Lucassen PJ, Spliet WG, Vreugdenhil E, van Rijen PC, Troost D, Jansen FE and Aronica E: Doublecortin-like (DCL) expression in focal cortical dysplasia and cortical tubers. Epilepsia. 50:2629–2637. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Guo W, Zheng DH, Sun FJ, Yang JY, Zang ZL, Liu SY, Yin Q, Zhang CQ and Yang H: Expression and cellular distribution of the interleukin 2 signaling system in cortical lesions from patients with focal cortical dysplasia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 73:206–222. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Chen J, Tsai V, Parker WE, Aronica E, Baybis M and Crino PB: Detection of human papillomavirus in human focal cortical dysplasia type IIB. Ann Neurol. 72:881–892. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Liu S, Lu L, Cheng X, Xu G and Yang H: Viral infection and focal cortical dysplasia. Ann Neurol. 75:614–616. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Buchkovich NJ, Yu Y, Zampieri CA and Alwine JC: The TORrid affairs of viruses: Effects of mammalian DNA viruses on the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signalling pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol. 6:266–275. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Shapiro KA, McGuone D, Deshpande V, Sadow PM, Stemmer-Rachamimov A and Staley KJ: Failure to detect human papillomavirus in focal cortical dysplasia type IIb. Ann Neurol. 78:63–67. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Becker AJ, Urbach H, Scheffler B, Baden T, Normann S, Lahl R, Pannek HW, Tuxhorn I, Elger CE, Schramm J, et al: Focal cortical dysplasia of Taylor's balloon cell type: Mutational analysis of the TSC1 gene indicates a pathogenic relationship to tuberous sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 52:29–37. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Jóźwiak S, Kwiatkowski D, Kotulska K, Larysz-Brysz M, Lewin-Kowalik J, Grajkowska W and Roszkowski M: Tuberin and hamartin expression is reduced in the majority of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis complex consistent with a two-hit model of pathogenesis. J Child Neurol. 19:102–106. 2004.

19 

Schick V, Majores M, Engels G, Hartmann W, Elger CE, Schramm J, Schoch S and Becker AJ: Differential Pi3K-pathway activation in cortical tubers and focal cortical dysplasias with balloon cells. Brain Pathol. 17:165–173. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Miyata H, Chiang AC and Vinters HV: Insulin signaling pathways in cortical dysplasia and TSC-tubers: Tissue microarray analysis. Ann Neurol. 56:510–519. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Patil VV, Guzman M, Carter AN, Rathore G, Yoshor D, Curry D, Wilfong A, Agadi S, Swann JW, Adesina AM, et al: Activation of extracellular regulated kinase and mechanistic target of rapamycin pathway in focal cortical dysplasia. Neuropathology. 36:146–156. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Lim JS, Kim WI, Kang HC, Kim SH, Park AH, Park EK, Cho YW, Kim S, Kim HM, Kim JA, et al: Brain somatic mutations in MTOR cause focal cortical dysplasia type II leading to intractable epilepsy. Nat Med. 21:395–400. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Cotter D, Honavar M, Lovestone S, Raymond L, Kerwin R, Anderton B and Everall I: Disturbance of Notch-1 and Wnt signalling proteins in neuroglial balloon cells and abnormal large neurons in focal cortical dysplasia in human cortex. Acta Neuropathol. 98:465–472. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Lamparello P, Baybis M, Pollard J, Hol EM, Eisenstat DD, Aronica E and Crino PB: Developmental lineage of cell types in cortical dysplasia with balloon cells. Brain. 130:2267–2276. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Crino PB, Trojanowski JQ and Eberwine J: Internexin, MAP1B, and nestin in cortical dysplasia as markers of developmental maturity. Acta Neuropathol. 93:619–627. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Jozwiak J, Jozwiak S and Wlodarski P: Possible mechanisms of disease development in tuberous sclerosis. Lancet Oncol. 9:73–79. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Buccoliero AM, Barba C, Giordano F, Baroni G, Genitori L, Guerrini R and Taddei GL: Expression of glutamine synthetase in balloon cells: A basis of their antiepileptic role? Clin Neuropathol. 34:83–88. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Cepeda C, Hurst RS, Flores-Hernández J, Hernández-Echeagaray E, Klapstein GJ, Boylan MK, Calvert CR, Jocoy EL, Nguyen OK, André VM, et al: Morphological and electro-physiological characterization of abnormal cell types in pediatric cortical dysplasia. J Neurosci Res. 72:472–486. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Cepeda C, André VM, Vinters HV, Levine MS and Mathern GW: Are cytomegalic neurons and balloon cells generators of epileptic activity in pediatric cortical dysplasia? Epilepsia. 46(Suppl 5): 82–88. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Cepeda C, André VM, Wu N, Yamazaki I, Uzgil B, Vinters HV, Levine MS and Mathern GW: Immature neurons and GABA networks may contribute to epileptogenesis in pediatric cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia. 48(Suppl 5): 79–85. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Calcagnotto ME, Paredes MF, Tihan T, Barbaro NM and Baraban SC: Dysfunction of synaptic inhibition in epilepsy associated with focal cortical dysplasia. J Neurosci. 25:9649–9657. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Aronica E, Boer K, Redeker S, Spliet WG, van Rijen PC, Troost D and Gorter JA: Differential expression patterns of chloride transporters, Na+-K+-2Cl - cotransporter and K+-Cl - cotransporter, in epilepsy-associated malformations of cortical development. Neuroscience. 145:185–196. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Aronica E, Boer K, Doorn KJ, Zurolo E, Spliet WG, van Rijen PC, Baayen JC, Gorter JA and Jeromin A: Expression and localization of voltage dependent potassium channel Kv4.2 in epilepsy associated focal lesions. Neurobiol Dis. 36:81–95. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Iyer A, Zurolo E, Spliet WG, van Rijen PC, Baayen JC, Gorter JA and Aronica E: Evaluation of the innate and adaptive immunity in type I and type II focal cortical dysplasias. Epilepsia. 51:1763–1773. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Harvey AS, Cross JH, Shinnar S and Mathern GW; ILAE Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Survey Taskforce: Defining the spectrum of international practice in pediatric epilepsy surgery patients. Epilepsia. 49:146–155. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Becker AJ, Blümcke I, Urbach H, Hans V and Majores M: Molecular neuropathology of epilepsy-associated glioneuronal malformations. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 65:99–108. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Spreafico R and Blümcke I: Focal Cortical Dysplasias: Clinical implication of neuropathological classification systems. Acta Neuropathol. 120:359–367. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Siegel AM, Cascino GD, Elger CE, Devinsky O, Laff R, Najjar S, Sperling MR, LoRusso G, Cossu M, Urbach H, et al: Adult-onset epilepsy in focal cortical dysplasia of Taylor type. Neurology. 64:1771–1774. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Fauser S, Schulze-Bonhage A, Honegger J, Carmona H, Huppertz HJ, Pantazis G, Rona S, Bast T, Strobl K, Steinhoff BJ, et al: Focal cortical dysplasias: Surgical outcome in 67 patients in relation to histological subtypes and dual pathology. Brain. 127:2406–2418. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Yao K, Mei X, Liu X, Duan Z, Liu C, Bian Y, Ma Z and Qi X: Clinical characteristics, pathological features and surgical outcomes of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II: Correlation with pathological subtypes. Neurol Sci. 35:1519–1526. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Serino D, Freri E, Ragona F, D'Incerti L, Bernardi B, Di Ciommo V, Granata T, Vigevano F and Fusco L: Focal seizures versus epileptic spasms in children with focal cortical dysplasia and epilepsy onset in the first year. Epilepsy Res. 109:203–209. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Widdess-Walsh P, Kellinghaus C, Jeha L, Kotagal P, Prayson R, Bingaman W and Najm IM: Electro-clinical and imaging characteristics of focal cortical dysplasia: Correlation with pathological subtypes. Epilepsy Res. 67:25–33. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Blümcke I: Neuropathology of focal epilepsies: A critical review. Epilepsy Behav. 15:34–39. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Cossu M, Fuschillo D, Bramerio M, Galli C, Gozzo F, Pelliccia V, Casaceli G, Tassi L and Lo Russo G: Epilepsy surgery of focal cortical dysplasia-associated tumors. Epilepsia. 54(Suppl 9): 115–122. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Krsek P, Pieper T, Karlmeier A, Hildebrandt M, Kolodziejczyk D, Winkler P, Pauli E, Blümcke I and Holthausen H: Different presurgical characteristics and seizure outcomes in children with focal cortical dysplasia type I or II. Epilepsia. 50:125–137. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Chassoux F, Devaux B, Landré E, Turak B, Nataf F, Varlet P, Chodkiewicz JP and Daumas-Duport C: Stereoelectroencephalography in focal cortical dysplasia: A 3D approach to delineating the dysplastic cortex. Brain. 123:1733–1751. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Barkovich AJ, Kuzniecky RI, Bollen AW and Grant PE: Focal transmantle dysplasia: A specific malformation of cortical development. Neurology. 49:1148–1152. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Colombo N, Tassi L, Deleo F, Citterio A, Bramerio M, Mai R, Sartori I, Cardinale F, Lo Russo G and Spreafico R: Focal cortical dysplasia type IIa and IIb: MRI aspects in 118 cases proven by histopathology. Neuroradiology. 54:1065–1077. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Mühlebner A, Coras R, Kobow K, Feucht M, Czech T, Stefan H, Weigel D, Buchfelder M, Holthausen H, Pieper T, et al: Neuropathologic measurements in focal cortical dysplasias: Validation of the ILAE 2011 classification system and diagnostic implications for MRI. Acta Neuropathol. 123:259–272. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Wagner J, Weber B, Urbach H, Elger CE and Huppertz HJ: Morphometric MRI analysis improves detection of focal cortical dysplasia type II. Brain. 134:2844–2854. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Blauwblomme T, Boddaert N, Chémaly N, Chiron C, Pages M, Varlet P, Bourgeois M, Bahi-Buisson N, Kaminska A, Grevent D, et al: Arterial Spin Labeling MRI: A step forward in non-invasive delineation of focal cortical dysplasia in children. Epilepsy Res. 108:1932–1939. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Chan HW, Pressler R, Uff C, Gunny R, St Piers K, Cross H, Bamber J, Dorward N, Harkness W and Chakraborty A: A novel technique of detecting MRI-negative lesion in focal symptomatic epilepsy: Intraoperative ShearWave elastography. Epilepsia. 55:e30–e33. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Sisodiya SM, Lin WR, Squier MV and Thom M: Multidrug-resistance protein 1 in focal cortical dysplasia. Lancet. 357:42–43. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Aronica E, Gorter JA, Jansen GH, van Veelen CW, van Rijen PC, Leenstra S, Ramkema M, Scheffer GL, Scheper RJ and Troost D: Expression and cellular distribution of multidrug transporter proteins in two major causes of medically intractable epilepsy: Focal cortical dysplasia and glioneuronal tumors. Neuroscience. 118:417–429. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Sisodiya SM, Martinian L, Scheffer GL, van der Valk P, Cross JH, Scheper RJ, Harding BN and Thom M: Major vault protein, a marker of drug resistance, is upregulated in refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 44:1388–1396. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Wong M, Ess KC, Uhlmann EJ, Jansen LA, Li W, Crino PB, Mennerick S, Yamada KA and Gutmann DH: Impaired glial glutamate transport in a mouse tuberous sclerosis epilepsy model. Ann Neurol. 54:251–256. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Uhlmann EJ, Wong M, Baldwin RL, Bajenaru ML, Onda H, Kwiatkowski DJ, Yamada K and Gutmann DH: Astrocyte-specific TSC1 conditional knockout mice exhibit abnormal neuronal organization and seizures. Ann Neurol. 52:285–296. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Ehninger D, Han S, Shilyansky C, Zhou Y, Li W, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ramesh V and Silva AJ: Reversal of learning deficits in a Tsc2+/− mouse model of tuberous sclerosis. Nat Med. 14:843–848. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Krueger DA, Care MM, Holland K, Agricola K, Tudor C, Mangeshkar P, Wilson KA, Byars A, Sahmoud T and Franz DN: Everolimus for subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 363:1801–1811. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Skirrow C, Cross JH, Cormack F, Harkness W, Vargha-Khadem F and Baldeweg T: Long-term intellectual outcome after temporal lobe surgery in childhood. Neurology. 76:1330–1337. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Chen HH, Chen C, Hung SC, Liang SY, Lin SC, Hsu TR, Yeh TC, Yu HY, Lin CF, Hsu SP, et al: Cognitive and epilepsy outcomes after epilepsy surgery caused by focal cortical dysplasia in children: Early intervention maybe better. Childs Nerv Syst. 30:1885–1895. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Wagner J, Urbach H, Niehusmann P, von Lehe M, Elger CE and Wellmer J: Focal cortical dysplasia type IIb: Completeness of cortical, not subcortical, resection is necessary for seizure freedom. Epilepsia. 52:1418–1424. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Mühlebner A, Gröppel G, Dressler A, Reiter-Fink E, Kasprian G, Prayer D, Dorfer C, Czech T, Hainfellner JA, Coras R, et al: Epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents with malformations of cortical development - outcome and impact of the new ILAE classification on focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsy Res. 108:1652–1661. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Kim DW, Lee SK, Chu K, Park KI, Lee SY, Lee CH, Chung CK, Choe G and Kim JY: Predictors of surgical outcome and pathologic considerations in focal cortical dysplasia. Neurology. 72:211–216. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Mrelashvili A, Witte RJ, Wirrell EC, Nickels KC and Wong-Kisiel LC: Seizure Freedom in Children With Pathology-Confirmed Focal Cortical Dysplasia. Pediatr Neurol. 53:513–518. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Jehi L, Yardi R, Chagin K, Tassi L, Russo GL, Worrell G, Hu W, Cendes F, Morita M, Bartolomei F, et al: Development and validation of nomograms to provide individualised predictions of seizure outcomes after epilepsy surgery: A retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. 14:283–290. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Bulacio JC, Jehi L, Wong C, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Kotagal P, Nair D, Najm I and Bingaman W: Long-term seizure outcome after resective surgery in patients evaluated with intracranial electrodes. Epilepsia. 53:1722–1730. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Simasathien T, Vadera S, Najm I, Gupta A, Bingaman W and Jehi L: Improved outcomes with earlier surgery for intractable frontal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 73:646–654. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Ryzí M, Ošlejšková H, Rektor I, Novák Z, Hemza J, Chrastina J, Svoboda M, Hermanová M and Brázdil M: Long-term approach to patients with postsurgical seizures. Epilepsia. 57:597–604. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Tassi L, Garbelli R, Colombo N, Bramerio M, Russo GL, Mai R, Deleo F, Francione S, Nobili L and Spreafico R: Electroclinical, MRI and surgical outcomes in 100 epileptic patients with type II FCD. Epileptic Disord. 14:257–266. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

71 

Rowland NC, Englot DJ, Cage TA, Sughrue ME, Barbaro NM and Chang EF: A meta-analysis of predictors of seizure freedom in the surgical management of focal cortical dysplasia. J Neurosurg. 116:1035–1041. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Fauser S, Essang C, Altenmüller DM, Staack A, Steinhoff BJ, Strobl K, Bast T, Schubert-Bast S, Doostkam S, Zentner J and Schulze-Bonhage A: Is there evidence for clinical differences related to the new classification of temporal lobe cortical dysplasia? Epilepsia. 54:909–917. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

73 

Giulioni M, Martinoni M and Marucci G: About focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type IIIa. Epilepsy Res. 108:1955–1957. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Giulioni M, Marucci G, Martinoni M, Volpi L, Riguzzi P, Marliani AF, Bisulli F, Tinuper P, Tassinari CA, Michelucci R, et al: Seizure outcome in surgically treated drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy based on the recent histopathological classifications. J Neurosurg. 119:37–47. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Santos MV, de Oliveira RS and Machado HR: Approach to cortical dysplasia associated with glial and glioneuronal tumors (FCD type IIIb). Childs Nerv Syst. 30:1869–1874. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Wu J, Li W, Chen Y, Kang L and Zhao W: Clinical characteristics of 92 patients with temporal lobe focal cortical dysplasia identified by pathological examination. J Clin Neurosci. 21:2170–2174. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Fauser S, Essang C, Altenmüller DM, Staack AM, Steinhoff BJ, Strobl K, Bast T, Schubert-Bast S, Stephani U, Wiegand G, et al: Long-term seizure outcome in 211 patients with focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia. 56:66–76. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Tassi L, Garbelli R, Colombo N, Bramerio M, Lo Russo G, Deleo F, Milesi G and Spreafico R: Type I focal cortical dysplasia: Surgical outcome is related to histopathology. Epileptic Disord. 12:181–191. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

79 

Tassi L, Meroni A, Deleo F, Villani F, Mai R, Russo GL, Colombo N, Avanzini G, Falcone C, Bramerio M, et al: Temporal lobe epilepsy: Neuropathological and clinical correlations in 243 surgically treated patients. Epileptic Disord. 11:281–292. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

80 

Thom M, Eriksson S, Martinian L, Caboclo LO, McEvoy AW, Duncan JS and Sisodiya SM: Temporal lobe sclerosis associated with hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: Neuropathological features. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 68:928–938. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

81 

Johnson AM, Sugo E, Barreto D, Cunningham AM, Hiew CC, Lawson JA, Somerville ER, Connolly AM and Bye AM: Clinicopathological associations in temporal lobe epilepsy patients utilising the current ILAE focal cortical dysplasia classification. Epilepsy Res. 108:1345–1351. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

82 

Simpson SL and Prayson RA: Post-surgical outcome for epilepsy associated with type I focal cortical dysplasia subtypes. Mod Pathol. 27:1455–1460. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

83 

Yagishita A and Arai N: Cortical tubers without other stigmata of tuberous sclerosis: Imaging and pathological findings. Neuroradiology. 41:428–432. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

84 

Jozwiak J, Kotulska K and Jozwiak S: Similarity of balloon cells in focal cortical dysplasia to giant cells in tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsia. 47:8052006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

85 

Hyman MH and Whittemore VH: National Institutes of Health consensus conference: Tuberous sclerosis complex. Arch Neurol. 57:662–665. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

86 

Jozwiak J, Jozwiak S and Skopinski P: Immunohistochemical and microscopic studies on giant cells in tuberous sclerosis. Histol Histopathol. 20:1321–1326. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

87 

Oh HS, Lee MC, Kim HS, Lee JS, Lee JH, Kim MK, Woo YJ, Kim JH, Kim HI and Kim SU: Pathophysiologic characteristics of balloon cells in cortical dysplasia. Childs Nerv Syst. 24:175–183. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

88 

Lazarowski A, Lubieniecki F, Camarero S, Pomata H, Bartuluchi M, Sevlever G and Taratuto AL: Multidrug resistance proteins in tuberous sclerosis and refractory epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol. 30:102–106. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

89 

Lugnier C, Majores M, Fassunke J, Pernhorst K, Niehusmann P, Simon M, Nellist M, Schoch S and Becker A: Hamartin variants that are frequent in focal dysplasias and cortical tubers have reduced tuberin binding and aberrant subcellular distribution in vitro. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 68:1136–1146. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

90 

Iyer A, Prabowo A, Anink J, Spliet WG, van Rijen PC and Aronica E: Cell injury and premature neurodegeneration in focal malformations of cortical development. Brain Pathol. 24:1–17. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

91 

McMahon J, Huang X, Yang J, Komatsu M, Yue Z, Qian J, Zhu X and Huang Y: Impaired autophagy in neurons after disinhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin and its contribution to epileptogenesis. J Neurosci. 32:15704–15714. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

92 

Yasin SA, Ali AM, Tata M, Picker SR, Anderson GW, Latimer-Bowman E, Nicholson SL, Harkness W, Cross JH, Paine SM and Jacques TS: mTOR-dependent abnormalities in autophagy characterize human malformations of cortical development: Evidence from focal cortical dysplasia and tuberous sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 126:207–218. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

93 

Lee CH, Inoki K and Guan KL: mTOR pathway as a target in tissue hypertrophy. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 47:443–467. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

94 

Kotulska K, Jurkiewicz E, Domańska-Pakieła D, Grajkowska W, Mandera M, Borkowska J and Jóźwiak S: Epilepsy in newborns with tuberous sclerosis complex. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 18:714–721. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2016
Volume 38 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Siedlecka M, Grajkowska W, Galus R, Dembowska-Bagińska B and Jóźwiak J: Focal cortical dysplasia: Molecular disturbances and clinicopathological classification (Review). Int J Mol Med 38: 1327-1337, 2016
APA
Siedlecka, M., Grajkowska, W., Galus, R., Dembowska-Bagińska, B., & Jóźwiak, J. (2016). Focal cortical dysplasia: Molecular disturbances and clinicopathological classification (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 38, 1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2760
MLA
Siedlecka, M., Grajkowska, W., Galus, R., Dembowska-Bagińska, B., Jóźwiak, J."Focal cortical dysplasia: Molecular disturbances and clinicopathological classification (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 38.5 (2016): 1327-1337.
Chicago
Siedlecka, M., Grajkowska, W., Galus, R., Dembowska-Bagińska, B., Jóźwiak, J."Focal cortical dysplasia: Molecular disturbances and clinicopathological classification (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 38, no. 5 (2016): 1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2760