Clinical significance of growth factor receptor EGFR and angiogenesis regulator VEGF‑R2 in patients with ovarian cancer at FIGO stages I-II

  • Authors:
    • Ingiridur Skirnisdottir
    • Helena Åkerud
    • Tomas Seidal
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 31, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4511
  • Pages: 1633-1642
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to investigate the prognostic effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the angiogenesis regulator vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGF‑R2) on disease-free survival (DFS) rate and recurrent disease, and their association with clinicopathological characteristics in 131 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-II epithelial ovarian cancer. The techniques of tissue microar­rays and immunohistochemistry were used for the positive detection of the markers. The frequency of positive staining in tumors for EGFR was 24% and for VEGF‑R2 was 77%. Across the cohort, there was a total of 34/131 recurrences (26%) and the 5‑year DFS rate was 68%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis with recurrent disease as the endpoint, FIGO stage (OR=9.7), type (I/II) of tumor (OR=3.0) and VEGF‑R2 status (OR=0.2) were all found to be independent predictive factors in the cohort of patients (n=131). For patients with non‑serous tumors (n=78), the FIGO stage (OR=76), type (I/II) of tumor (OR=44), EGFR status (OR=0.05) and VEGF‑R2 status (OR=0.008) were all significant and independent predictive factors. On comparing the four subgroups, in terms of concomitant EGFR and VEGF‑R2 status, in a survival analysis, the subgroup of patients (n=21) with concomitant positive expression of EGFR and VEGF‑R2 had a 5‑year DFS rate of 100%. Therefore, the prognostic effect of EGFR and VEGF‑R2 for recurrent disease and survival rates was confirmed by the above findings. Certain results in the present study were not in line with results from previous studies on the prognostic effect of EGFR and VEGF‑R2. An increasing number of preclinical and clinical observations have shown that the process of angiogenesis remains to be fully elucidated. Therefore, one of the challenges for future ovarian cancer investigations is to identify which biomarkers may be used as predictive and prognostic markers.

References

1 

Siwak DR, Carey M, Hennessy BT, Nguyen CT, McGahren Murray MJ, Nolden L and Mills GB: Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in epithelial ovarian cancer: Current knowledge and future challenges. J Oncol. 2010:5689382010. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Sheng Q and Liu J: The therapeutic potential of targeting the EGFR family in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 104:1241–1245. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Skirnisdottir I, Sorbe B and Seidal T: The growth factor receptors HER-2/neu and EGFR, their relationship, and their effects on the prognosis inearly stage (FIGO I-II) epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 11:119–129. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Gavalas NG, Liontos M, Trachana SP, Bagratuni T, Arapinis C, Liacos C, Dimopoulos MA and Bamias A: Angiogenesis-related pathways in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 14:15885–15909. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Klasa-Mazurkiewicz D, Jarząb M, Milczek T, Lipińska B and Emerich J: Clinical significance of VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 expression in ovarian cancer patients. Pol J Pathol. 62:31–40. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Nishida N, Yano H, Komai K, Nishida T, Kamura T and Kojiro M: Vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 are related closely to the prognosis of patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 101:1364–1374. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Lassus H, Sihto H, Leminen A, Joensuu H, Isola J, Nupponen NN and Butzow R: Gene amplification, mutation, and protein expression of EGFR and mutations of ERBB2 in serous ovarian carcinoma. J Mol Med (Berl). 84:671–681. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Maj E, Papiernik D and Wietrzyk J: Antiangiogenic cancer treatment: The great discovery and greater complexity (Review). Int J of Oncol. 49:1773–1784. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Elie C, Geay JF, Morcos M, Le Tourneau A, Girre V, Broët P, Marmey B, Chauvenet L, Audouin J, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al GINECO Group: Lack of relationship between EGFR-1 immunohistochemical expression and prognosis in a multicentre clinical trial of 93 patients with advanced primary ovarian epithelial cancer (GINECO group). Br J Cancer. 91:470–475. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Skirnisdottir I, Seidal T and Åkerud H: The relationship of the angiogenesis regulators VEGF-A, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 to p53 status and prognostic factors in epithelial ovarian carcinoma in FIGO-stages I-II. Int J Oncol. 48:998–1006. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

World Medical Association: WMA Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjectsurisimplehttps://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects.

12 

Trimbos JB, Vergote I, Bolis G, Vermorken JB, Mangioni C, Madronal C, Franchi M, Tateo S, Zanetta G, Scarfone G, et al EORTC-ACTION collaborators; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Adjuvant ChemoTherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm: Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Adjuvant ChemoTherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 95:113–125. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Bärlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G and Kallioniemi OP: Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med. 4:844–847. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Seidal T, Balaton AJ and Battifora H: Interpretation and quantification of immunostains. Am J Surg Pathol. 25:1204–1207. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, McKinney S, Mehl E, Palmer C, Leung S, Bowen NJ, Ionescu DN, Rajput A, et al: Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: Implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med. 5:e2322008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Despierre E, Vergote I, Anderson R, Coens C, Katsaros D, Hirsch FR, Boeckx B, Varella-Garcia M, Ferrero A, Ray-Coquard I, et al European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG); Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO); Austrian Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (A-AGO); National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI); Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG); Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology group (MaNGO): Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway biomarkers in the randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus observation in ovarian cancer patients with no evidence of disease progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Target Oncol. 10:583–596. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

de Graeff P, Crijns APG, Ten Hoor KA, Klip HG, Hollema H, Oien K, Bartlett JM, Wisman GB, de Bock GH, de Vries EG, et al: The ErbB signalling pathway: Protein expression and prognostic value in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 99:341–349. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zeineldin R, Muller CY, Stack MS and Hudson LG: Targeting the EGF receptor for ovarian cancer therapy. J Oncol. 2010:4146762010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Huang J, Hu W and Sood AK: Prognostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biomark. 8:231–251. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Cao C, Lu S, Sowa A, Kivlin R, Amaral A, Chu W, Yang H, Di W and Wan Y: Priming with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and EGF sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to respond to chemotherapeutical drugs. Cancer Lett. 266:249–262. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Komatsu H, Oishi T, Itamochi H, Shimada M, Sato S, Chikumi J, Sato S, Nonaka M, Sawada M, Wakahara M, et al: Serum vascular endothelial growth factor-A as a prognostic biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 27:1325–1332. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Burger RA: Role of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. J Gynecol Oncol. 21:3–11. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Tang C, Hess K, Jardim DL, Gagliato Dde M, Tsimberidou AM, Falchook G, Fu S, Janku F, Naing A, Piha-Paul S, et al: Synergy between VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors and chemotherapy agents in the phase I clinic. Clin Cancer Res. 20:5956–5963. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hicklin DJ and Ellis LM: Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis (review). J Clin Oncol. 23:1011–1027. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Casanovas O, Hicklin DJ, Bergers G and Hanahan D: Drug resistance by evasion of antiangiogenic targeting of VEGF signaling in late-stage pancreatic islet tumors. Cancer Cell. 8:299–309. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Bergers G and Hanahan D: Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 8:592–603. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Takahashi Y, Saga Y, Koyanagi T, Takei Y, Machida S, Taneichi A, Mizukami H, Sato Y, Matsubara S and Fujiwara H: The angiogenesis regulator vasohibin-1 inhibits ovarian cancer growth and peritoneal dissemination and prolongs host survival. Int J Oncol. 47:2057–2063. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Annunziata CM, Walker AJ, Minasian L, Yu M, Kotz H, Wood BJ, Calvo K, Choyke P, Kimm D, Steinberg SM, et al: Vandetanib, designed to inhibit VEGFR2 and EGFR signaling, had no clinical activity as monotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer and no detectable modulation of VEGFR2. Clin Cancer Res. 16:664–672. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October 2018
Volume 53 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Skirnisdottir, I., Åkerud, H., & Seidal, T. (2018). Clinical significance of growth factor receptor EGFR and angiogenesis regulator VEGF‑R2 in patients with ovarian cancer at FIGO stages I-II. International Journal of Oncology, 53, 1633-1642. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4511
MLA
Skirnisdottir, I., Åkerud, H., Seidal, T."Clinical significance of growth factor receptor EGFR and angiogenesis regulator VEGF‑R2 in patients with ovarian cancer at FIGO stages I-II". International Journal of Oncology 53.4 (2018): 1633-1642.
Chicago
Skirnisdottir, I., Åkerud, H., Seidal, T."Clinical significance of growth factor receptor EGFR and angiogenesis regulator VEGF‑R2 in patients with ovarian cancer at FIGO stages I-II". International Journal of Oncology 53, no. 4 (2018): 1633-1642. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4511