Open Access

LRG1 promotes angiogenesis through upregulating the TGF‑β1 pathway in ischemic rat brain

  • Authors:
    • Hongmei Meng
    • Yuejia Song
    • Jiyuan Zhu
    • Qi Liu
    • Pengtian Lu
    • Na Ye
    • Zhen Zhang
    • Yuxin Pang
    • Jiping Qi
    • He Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 7, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5925
  • Pages: 5535-5543
  • Copyright: © Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Stroke is a life-threatening disease that results in significant disability in the human population. Despite the advances in current stroke therapies, a host of patients do not benefit from the conventional treatments. Thus, more effective therapies are required. It has been previously reported that leucine‑rich‑α2‑glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) is crucial during the formation of new blood vessels in retinal diseases. However, the function of LRG1 in the brain during the neovessel growth process following ischemic stroke has not been fully elucidated and the mechanism underlying its effect on angiogenesis remains unclear. The purpose of the current study was to demonstrate whether LRG1 may promote angiogenesis through the transforming growth factor (TGF)‑β1 signaling pathway in ischemic rat brain following middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). In the present study, the spatial and temporal expression of LRG1, TGF‑β1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin‑2 (Ang‑2) were detected in ischemic rat brain following MCAO using reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR), western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. CD34 immunohistochemistry staining was used as an indicator of microvessel density (MVD). The RT‑qPCR and western blotting results revealed that the levels of LRG1 and TGF‑β1 mRNA and protein expression were significantly increased as early as 6 and 12 h after MCAO (P<0.05), respectively, peaked at 3 days and persisted at significantly higher level until 14 days, in comparison with the control group. Additionally, VEGF and Ang‑2 were also increased following MCAO. Furthermore, the immunohistochemistry results suggested that the MVD was increased following MCAO. In addition, the results also revealed that the percentage of LRG1‑positive cells was positively correlated with the percentage of TGF‑β1‑positive cells, and the percentage of LRG1‑positive and TGF‑β1‑positive cells had a positively correlation with the MVD. Taken together, the present study indicated that LRG1 may promote angiogenesis through upregulating the TGF‑β1 signaling pathway in ischemic rat brain following MCAO. This may provide a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of ischemic stroke.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2016
Volume 14 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Meng H, Song Y, Zhu J, Liu Q, Lu P, Ye N, Zhang Z, Pang Y, Qi J, Wu H, Wu H, et al: LRG1 promotes angiogenesis through upregulating the TGF‑β1 pathway in ischemic rat brain. Mol Med Rep 14: 5535-5543, 2016
APA
Meng, H., Song, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, Q., Lu, P., Ye, N. ... Wu, H. (2016). LRG1 promotes angiogenesis through upregulating the TGF‑β1 pathway in ischemic rat brain. Molecular Medicine Reports, 14, 5535-5543. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5925
MLA
Meng, H., Song, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, Q., Lu, P., Ye, N., Zhang, Z., Pang, Y., Qi, J., Wu, H."LRG1 promotes angiogenesis through upregulating the TGF‑β1 pathway in ischemic rat brain". Molecular Medicine Reports 14.6 (2016): 5535-5543.
Chicago
Meng, H., Song, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, Q., Lu, P., Ye, N., Zhang, Z., Pang, Y., Qi, J., Wu, H."LRG1 promotes angiogenesis through upregulating the TGF‑β1 pathway in ischemic rat brain". Molecular Medicine Reports 14, no. 6 (2016): 5535-5543. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5925