In vivo 18F‑fluorodeoxyglucose‑positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of pancreatic tumors in a transgenic rat model carrying the human KRASG12V oncogene

  • Authors:
    • Koji Shibata
    • Katsumi Fukamachi
    • Atsushi Tsuji
    • Tsuneo Saga
    • Mitsuru Futakuchi
    • Masato Nagino
    • Hiroyuki Tsuda
    • Masumi Suzui
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 18, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3053
  • Pages: 2112-2118
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

A novel KRAS‑mediated transgenic rat model has previously been demonstrated, in which animals develop multiple pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that is histologically similar to human PDAC within two weeks. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for the diagnosis and staging of PDAC in humans, and can be adopted for optimal use in animal experiments. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the carcinogenic process in a rat pancreatic carcinoma model using small‑animal multimodality imaging systems. The utility of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‑PET/CT in detecting the location and size of PDAC during tumor development in the present transgenic rat model was assessed. A small animal multimodality PET/CT system and contrast‑enhanced CT (CECT) system were used for the imaging analysis of KRASG12V male transgenic rats (n=6), which developed pancreatic tumors following the administration of an injection of Cre recombinase (Cre)‑carrying adenovirus. Laparotomies performed at six weeks post‑treatment revealed that all three (100%) Cre‑expressing rats developed pancreatic tumors that were <2 mm in diameter, none of which were detected by 18F‑FDG PET/CT or CECT. At eight weeks post‑treatment, the pancreatic tumors were heterogeneously visualized by 18F‑FDG‑PET/CT and CECT in two of the three rats. Furthermore, the autopsies confirmed that all three rats had developed pancreatic tumors. These novel findings provide evidence that the FDG‑PET/CT imaging system is a valuable tool for the evaluation of the carcinogenic process, and one which may aid in treatment and preventive methods for pancreatic tumors in mammalian models. A limitation associated with the early detection of PDACs warrants further investigation.

Introduction

With >250,000 annual mortalities, pancreatic carcinoma is one of the most lethal malignancies, ranking 12th worldwide (1). Mortality resulting from this disease is high even in developed countries, including Japan, the United Kingdom, France and the United States (2,3). Overall, >75% of pancreatic carcinoma cases are histologically characterized as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (4,5). The majority of cases of PDAC are incurable due to the necessity of extensive resection, which is often not feasible, and due to the fact that the disease is rarely identified at an early stage. Furthermore, the majority of patients with advanced PDAC either do not respond, or respond transiently to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation (6). Typically, the majority of patients with PDAC succumb to the disease within one year of diagnosis, and the overall five-year survival rate is <5% (7). Even in patients with resectable carcinoma, the long-term outcome remains unsatisfactory due to the incidence of early recurrence following surgical resection.

In order to gain an improved understanding of this lethal malignant carcinoma, studies that use animal PDAC models with pancreatic neoplasms that resemble human PDAC are usually desirable. By focusing on human pancreatic adenocarcinomas that express a high frequency of KRAS mutation, a transgenic rat model carrying the human HRASG12V or KRASG12V oncogene was established (8,9). The activation of the target transgene is attained by the injection of a Cre recombinase (Cre)-carrying adenovirus into the pancreatic ducts of the animal via the common bile duct (8,9). In this model, the transgenic rats usually develop pre-neoplastic and neoplastic pancreatic lesions within two weeks of the viral inoculation (10). These lesions in the transgenic rats exhibit morphological similarities to those observed in human pancreatic lesions, including PDAC (11) and intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) (9).

Due to the position of the tumors within the abdominal cavity, laparotomy is the only technique that is able to determine the existence and size of pancreatic tumors within the transgenic rats following virus inoculation, as the tumors cannot be visually assessed from surface scans of the affected rats. A previous study determined that in order to serologically detect early-stage PDAC in the rat models, serum N-ERC levels and the levels of several serum miRNAs, which are expressed differentially in PDAC transgenic rats and control rats, could be used (8,12). However, even in the case of elevated levels of high serum biomarkers, the exact location and size of pancreatic tumors is difficult to detect unless exploratory surgery is performed within the abdominal cavity.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ([18F-FDG-PET) is commonly used during the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors (13,14). Due to a high sensitivity and penetration depth, PET is considered to be more accurate for the detection and identification of metastases in humans and animal models than other imaging systems (15,16).

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the carcinogenic process in a mammalian model using imaging modalities, such as PET/computed tomography (CT), which are applicable for the study of human PDAC.

Materials and methods

Animals

In total, six male KRASG12V oncogene transgenic rats were used in the present study. Routine genotyping was performed as previously described (8). The rats were kept in plastic cages in an air-conditioned room at 24±2°C and 60±5% humidity with a 12-h light/12-hour dark cycle. A basal diet (Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and tap water were available ad libitum throughout the experiment. All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences and the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Tokyo, Japan).

Procedure of adenovirus inoculation

The preparation and inoculation of the adenoviruses was performed as previously described (9). In brief, a Cre-recombinase expressing adenovirus was amplified in HEK293 cells and then purified using the Vivapure AdenoPACK (Vivascience, Hannover, Germany) (17). The titer of the adenovirus was then determined using an Adeno-X rapid titer kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). The virus was prepared to a concentration of 4.0×109 plaque-forming units/ml. The virus (300–400 µl) was injected using a small syringe into the pancreatic duct of the rats as previously described (9).

[18F-FDG-PET and CT procedures, and image analysis

The time course of the experimental protocol is shown in Fig. 1. For the present study, 10-week-old male KRASG12V transgenic rats were used. The rats were divided into two groups, with three rats per group. The rats in groups 1 and 2 were administered with the Cre-expressing adenovirus vector or an empty vector (negative control), respectively. A small-animal multimodality PET system (Inveon; Siemens Healthcare Inc., Malvern, PA, USA) was used for PET data acquisition. Following an overnight fast, each rat (body weight, 403–583 g) was injected with 15 MBq (14.6±1.6 MBq) 18F-FDG (Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) via the tail vein, whilst the rat was under isoflurane anesthesia. The PET data acquisition was conducted for 10 min, beginning 50 min after the 18F-FDG injection. Using a lamp, the body temperature of the rats was maintained at between 36 and 37°C during the scan. The images were reconstructed using a 3D maximum a posteriori (18 iterations with 16 subsets; β=0.2), without attenuation correction. The tracer uptake was expressed as the standardized uptake value (SUV).

Subsequent to PET scanning, plain or contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was conducted with an X-ray source set at 90 kVp and 200 µA, using a small-animal CT system (R_mCT2; Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). For CECT, the rats were intravenously injected with 10 ml Iopamiron 370 contrast medium (Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Osaka, Japan) using an infusion pump (NE-1000; Neuroscience Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at the rate of 2 ml/min, whilst the rats were under isoflurane anesthesia. The CECT images were acquired 5 min subsequent to the injection. In order to reduce the motion artifacts caused by respiratory and peristaltic movement during the CT scan, a respiratory gating system was used whilst the rats under inhalable isoflurane anesthesia. The 18F-FDG-PET scanning was conducted at two, three, four, five and eight weeks subsequent to administration of the Cre-expressing adenovirus or the empty vectors. In order to confirm the results of the PET analysis, the CECT scan was also conducted at five and eight weeks subsequent to the virus injection. For the quantitative analysis, the PET and CT data sets were imported and the fused images were then obtained using ASIPro VM software (CTI Concorde Microsystems, Knoxville, TN, USA). Laparotomy was performed six weeks subsequent to the injection in order to confirm the location and size of the pancreatic tumors, which were visible to the naked eye. The experimental rats were sacrificed eight weeks subsequent to the injection.

Histopathological examination

The rats in groups 1 and 2 survived until the end of the experimental period. The pancreatic tumors and the normal pancreatic lobes were removed from the abdomen of the rats, fixed with 10% buffered formalin and then processed for histopathological examination using hematoxylin and eosin stain (9). The pancreatic lesions were diagnosed histopathologically based upon previously described criteria (8,9).

Results

PET/CT findings and histopathological examination

The six rats were euthanized eight weeks subsequent to the injection of the Cre-expressing viral or empty vectors. All three Cre-expressing transgenic rats in group 1 (100%) developed orthotopic pancreatic tumors without distant metastasis. By contrast, no tumors were identified in the negative control rats of group 2. Upon macroscopic analysis, the tumors appeared nodular and solid in shape, and were ochre yellow in color. The PET/CT images obtained eight weeks subsequent to the viral injection revealed the majority of tumor tissues to be distinguishable from the adjacent organs, but the tissues were challenging to distinguish from the normal intestinal tissues, depending on the site of the tumor. The pancreatic tumors were of the ductal adenocarcinoma histological type. The coexistence of adenocarcinoma and PanIN lesions surrounded by fibrous tissue with inflammatory cell infiltration was also identified (Fig. 2).

[18F-FDG-PET imaging prior to experimental week five

The representative maximal-intensity projection images from 18F-FDG-PET are shown in Fig. 3. PET scanning was performed four times prior to the five experimental weeks. A marginal or very high uptake in the gastrointestinal tract and urinary bladder, which was considered to be physiological FDG uptake, was observed in all three Cre-expressing transgenic rats and three control rats. At five weeks post-treatment, the tumors were not clearly visualized by the indicated imaging system. Following the laparotomy at six weeks post-treatment, a few small nodules measuring between 1 and 2 mm in diameter, indicative of a carcinoma, were identified in the pancreas of all Cre-expressing transgenic rats. No metastases were identified in the rats of the negative control group.

Analysis of CECT, PET and PET/CT images at eight weeks post-treatment

Representative slices of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT fusion images obtained from the Cre-expressing transgenic rats are shown in Figs. 46. The SUVmax and SUVmean of the pancreatic tumors and each organ are shown in Table I. In rat 1 (body weight, 503 g), the CECT images revealed a heterogeneous lesion measuring 17 mm in the maximum sagittal diameter in the left side of the abdomen. In addition, the PET and PET/CT fusion images revealed moderately increased 18F-FDG uptake in the lesion located in the left side of the abdomen, with a SUVmax of <1.5. Physiological FDG uptake was observed in the gastrointestinal tract, and the SUVmax of this organ site was 3.2, as shown in Table I. Autopsy revealed a large tumor in the splenic lobe, which was detected by CECT and PET/CT. However, multiple tumors that were present in the duodenal lobe of the pancreas were not revealed by CECT and PET/CT (Fig. 4). In rat 2 (body weight, 470 g), the CECT images revealed a heterogeneously-enhanced pancreatic tumor, measuring 20 mm in the maximum sagittal diameter, in the left side of the abdomen. PET/CT fusion images revealed moderate uptake of 18F-FDG (SUVmax, 3.0) in the pancreatic tumor. In addition, physiological FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract (SUVmax, 2.7) was observed. During autopsy, a large tumor in the splenic lobe was identified by the imaging analysis. In addition, multiple tumors were identified in the duodenal lobe of the pancreas, but these tumors were not visualized on CECT and PET/CT (Fig. 5). In rat 3 (body weight, 564 g), the presence of a tumor was not observed on either CECT or PET scans (Fig. 6). Next, an incision was made in the abdomen of the rat, and a number of nodules, which were smaller in size than those observed in rats no. 1 and 2, were identified in the duodenal lobe of the pancreas. No tumor was identified in the splenic lobe of the pancreas. No macroscopic metastasis was identified in rats 1–3.

Table I.

Mean SUV of the tumor and each organ in the experimental rats.

Table I.

Mean SUV of the tumor and each organ in the experimental rats.

RatTumor (SUVmax)GI tract (SUVmax)LiverKidney (cortex and medulla)
10.7–1.2 (1.4)0.5–1.0 (3.2)0.4–0.50.8–0.9
20.9–2.0 (3.0)0.5–1.8 (2.7)0.5–0.60.9–1.1
3ND0.6–1.4 (4.2)0.6–0.70.9–1.1

[i] The rats were inoculated with a Cre recombinase-expressing vector as described in the Materials and methods section. The values were calculated using the scanning data obtained at eight weeks post-inoculation. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; GI, gastrointestinal; ND, Not detected.

Discussion

A limited number of the documented studies that involve imaging analysis of pancreatic tumors in animal models used the FDG-PET/CT system (18,19). In the present study, a KRAS-mediated transgenic rat model was used to develop multiple pancreatic tumors that resembled the developmental and histological features of human PDAC within two weeks (8). In living rats at eight weeks post-treatment, the pancreatic tumors were clearly enhanced in the CECT images following the administration of a contrast media, and were distinguishable from the gastrointestinal tract. In the absence of imaging analysis, calipers are used to determine the location and size of a pancreatic tumor following a laparotomy or autopsy of an animal. Imaging analysis therefore allows each animal to be scanned sequentially in a sectional plane of interest, such as transverse, coronal or sagittal, and be monitored over time without the need to be sacrificed. In addition, PET/CT enables the accurate measurement of irregularly-shaped tumors in a pancreatic tumor model. According to the Three Rs principle (20), which aims to replace existing experimental methods with those that do not use animals, reduce the number of test animals used and refine methods in order to minimize the suffering of test animals, the PET/CT system reduces the number of animals required for experimental treatment and control groups. This indicates that imaging systems should be recommended for use in animal experiments. Recently, inoculation efficacy has been improved by clamping the common bile duct and increasing the amount of virus that is administered. Using this technique, studies may be able to control the size of the pancreatic tumor quantitatively within an appropriate time period, a factor that demonstrates the usefulness of this model.

With regard to studies that have used small animal models, Kitahashi et al (21) used micro-CT to detect chemically-induced pancreatic tumors of >4 mm in diameter in Syrian hamsters. Another study by Fendrich et al (18) detected precursor pancreatic adenocarcinoma lesions with an activity of 9.6±0.5 MBq in a five-month-old transgenic mouse model by FDG-PET/CT. Kayed et al (22) measured the anticancer effects of cyclopamine in a pancreatic carcinoma xenograft with an activity of 7.4 MBq model using 18F-PET/CT. The study examined the size and SUV of each tumor that was grown in the hip region of nude mice during a seven-day treatment period. A technical limitation in baseline calibration occurred, but the system was believed to be suitable for practical use. The SUV and SUVmax parameters have been demonstrated in a previous study to be potential predictors of early recurrence following the curative resection of lung carcinomas (23).

It was hypothesized that the amount of FDG uptake into the pancreatic tumors would be higher compared with other abdominal organs. However, the results shown in Table I indicate that each value was not necessarily specific to the region of interest. This indicates a limitation in the use of this parameter for differential diagnoses that are based upon imaging techniques. To avoid bias during the measurement of the SUV, representative areas of tumor tissues that demonstrated moderate FDG uptake were selected. Therefore, the potential limitations of this methodology should be considered when calculating the SUV or SUVmax. This aspect warrants further investigation.

PET images did not identify tumor masses in any organ of the Cre-expressing rats until five weeks post-treatment (Fig. 3). When the laparotomy was performed six weeks subsequent to the viral inoculation, multiple tumors measuring <2 mm in diameter were identified in the pancreas of all three Cre-expressing transgenic rats. This indicated that the transgenic rats developed macroscopically visible tumors by six weeks post-treatment. At eight weeks post-treatment, the PET/CT images revealed pancreatic tumor masses in two of the three rats, which indicated a potential limitation in the detection of tumors prior to the eighth week by current imaging techniques. Pancreatic tumors were primarily identified in the splenic lobe of the pancreas by PET/CT. Tumors in the duodenal lobe, however, could not be detected by such imaging analyses, even if these tumors were confirmed by laparotomy. In addition, the presence of smaller tumors, and a specific anatomical location within the gastrointestinal tract, may affect the visibility of the tumor. In the PET and PET/CT fusion images, the pancreatic tumors were visible, but the physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the intestine reduced the appearance of the lesions.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that pancreatic tumors can be detected in rats using imaging modalities eight weeks after viral inoculation. The FDG-PET/CT imaging system is a valuable approach for the evaluation of the carcinogenic process and potential treatment or prevention methods for pancreatic tumors in mammalian models. Therefore, it is proposed that this experimental system can also be applied to studies that examine cases of human PDAC.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Maki Okada for providing technical assistance with the CECT scanning, Hidekatsu Wakizaka for providing operational and quality control support for the PET system and Nobuyuki Miyahara for providing quality control support for the CT system.

References

1 

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T and Nishimoto H: Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group: Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2007: a study of 21 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 43:328–336. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Zeegers MP and Boffetta P: Pancreatic cancer: overview of descriptive epidemiology. Mol Carcinog. 51:3–13. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Cubilla AL and Fitzgerald PJ: Cancer of the exocrine pancreas: the pathologic aspects. CA Cancer J Clin. 35:2–18. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Morohoshi T, Held G and Klöppel G: Exocrine pancreatic tumours and their histological classification. A study based on 167 autopsy and 97 surgical cases. Histopathology. 7:645–661. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, et al: Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:318–348. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:11–30. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Fukamachi K, Tanaka H, Hagiwara Y, et al: An animal model of preclinical diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 390:636–641. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Ueda S, Fukamachi K, Matsuoka Y, et al: Ductal origin of pancreatic adenocarcinomas induced by conditional activation of a human Ha-ras oncogene in rat pancreas. Carcinogenesis. 27:2497–2510. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yabushita S, Fukamachi K, Tanaka H, et al: Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling of human K-ras oncogene transgenic rats with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Carcinogenesis. 34:1251–1259. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Yabushita S, Fukamachi K, Kikuchi F, et al: Twenty-one proteins up-regulated in human H-ras oncogene transgenic rat pancreas cancers are up-regulated in human pancreas cancer. Pancreas. 42:1034–1039. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Yabushita S, Fukamachi K, Tanaka H, et al: Circulating microRNAs in serum of human K-ras oncogene transgenic rats with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Pancreas. 41:1013–1018. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Asagi A, Ohta K, Nasu J, et al: Utility of contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer: impact on diagnosis, staging, evaluation of treatment response, and detection of recurrence. Pancreas. 42:11–19. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Tomimaru Y, Takeda Y, Tatsumi M, et al: Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Oncol Rep. 24:613–620. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Lan BY, Kwee SA and Wong LL: Positron emission tomography in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies: a review. Am J Surg. 204:232–241. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Studwell AJ and Kotton DN: A shift from cell cultures to creatures: in vivo imaging of small animals in experimental regenerative medicine. Mol Ther. 19:1933–1941. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Kanegae Y, Lee G, Sato Y, et al: Efficient gene activation in mammalian cells by using recombinant adenovirus expressing site-specific Cre recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:3816–3821. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Fendrich V, Schneider R, Maitra A, Jacobsen ID, Opfermann T and Bartsch DK: Detection of precursor lesions of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in PET-CT in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Neoplasia. 13:180–186. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

van Kouwen MC, Laverman P, van Krieken JH, Oyen WJ, Jansen JB and Drenth JP: FDG-PET in the detection of early pancreatic cancer in a BOP hamster model. Nucl Med Biol. 32:445–450. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Russell WMS and Burch RL: The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique2nd. Methuen & Co; London: 1992

21 

Kitahashi T, Mutoh M, Tsurusaki M, et al: Imaging study of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in Syrian hamsters using X-ray micro-computed tomography (CT). Cancer Sci. 101:1761–1766. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kayed H, Meyer P, He Y, et al: Evaluation of the metabolic response to cyclopamine therapy in pancreatic cancer xenografts using a clinical PET-CT system. Transl Oncol. 5:335–343. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sakai T, Tsushima T, Kimura D, Hatanaka R, Yamada Y and Fukuda I: A clinical study of the prognostic factors for postoperative early recurrence in patients who underwent complete resection for pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 17:539–543. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2015
Volume 9 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shibata K, Fukamachi K, Tsuji A, Saga T, Futakuchi M, Nagino M, Tsuda H and Suzui M: In vivo 18F‑fluorodeoxyglucose‑positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of pancreatic tumors in a transgenic rat model carrying the human KRASG12V oncogene. Oncol Lett 9: 2112-2118, 2015
APA
Shibata, K., Fukamachi, K., Tsuji, A., Saga, T., Futakuchi, M., Nagino, M. ... Suzui, M. (2015). In vivo 18F‑fluorodeoxyglucose‑positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of pancreatic tumors in a transgenic rat model carrying the human KRASG12V oncogene. Oncology Letters, 9, 2112-2118. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3053
MLA
Shibata, K., Fukamachi, K., Tsuji, A., Saga, T., Futakuchi, M., Nagino, M., Tsuda, H., Suzui, M."In vivo 18F‑fluorodeoxyglucose‑positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of pancreatic tumors in a transgenic rat model carrying the human KRASG12V oncogene". Oncology Letters 9.5 (2015): 2112-2118.
Chicago
Shibata, K., Fukamachi, K., Tsuji, A., Saga, T., Futakuchi, M., Nagino, M., Tsuda, H., Suzui, M."In vivo 18F‑fluorodeoxyglucose‑positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of pancreatic tumors in a transgenic rat model carrying the human KRASG12V oncogene". Oncology Letters 9, no. 5 (2015): 2112-2118. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3053