ijmm
www.spandidos-publications.com
Home  | About  | Contact
Spandidos Logo
Advanced Search
Login  | Register


congress_banner

main_table_top_image
   Current Issue Early Online Archive Manuscript Submission About Editor and Editorial Academy Sitemap
Effect of glucosamine, a therapeutic agent for osteoarthritis, on osteoblastic cell differentiation

Authors:
Mamoru Igarashi, Koji Sakamoto, Isao Nagaoka

Affiliations:
Department of Host Defense and Biochemical Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan, Department of Host Defense and Biochemical Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan

Published online on:
Friday, April 29, 2011

Doi:
10.3892/ijmm.2011.686

Pages:
373-379

Abstract:

Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by qualitative and quantitative changes in the architecture and composition of all the joint structures. Glucosamine (GlcN) has been used to treat OA in humans, because GlcN is present in the cartilage tissues as a component of glycosaminoglycans, and exhibits the symptom-modifying effect on OA by normalizing cartilage metabolism. On the other hand, the pathological change of subchondral bone is associated with the initiation and progression of cartilage damage in OA. However, the effect of GlcN on bone metabolism remains unsolved. In the present study, we determined the effect of GlcN on bone metabolism (osteoblastic cell differentiation) using mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells by evaluating the expression of early (type I collagen and alkaline phosphatase), middle (osteopontin) and late (osteocalcin and mineralization) stage differentiation markers, and further compared its effects to those of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc), a derivative of GlcN. The results indicated that the mineralization of mature osteoblasts was increased by treatment with GlcN and GlcNAc. Furthermore, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses revealed that GlcN and GlcNAc substantially increased the expression of a middle stage marker and a late stage marker, although they did not essentially affect the expression of early stage markers. In addition, GlcN and GlcNAc suppressed the expression of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), a key factor involved in the osteoclastic cell differentiation and activation. Together these observations suggest that both GlcN and GlcNAc may have a potential not only to induce osteoblastic cell differentiation especially at middle-late stages, but also to suppress the osteoclastic cell differentiation, thereby possibly increasing bone matrix deposition and decreasing bone resorption, and eventually modulating bone metabolism in OA.

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

September 2011
Volume 28 Number 3


Viewing options: Sign up for eToc alerts

Share this article:



main_table_bottom_image