Low-frequency low energy ultrasound combined with microbubbles induces distinct apoptosis of A7r5 cells

Zhang,Bo; Zhou,Hongsheng; Cheng,Qian; Lei,Lei; Hu,Bing

doi:10.3892/mmr.2014.2654

Low-frequency low energy ultrasound combined with microbubbles induces distinct apoptosis of A7r5 cells

Authors:
- Bo Zhang
- Hongsheng Zhou
- Qian Cheng
- Lei Lei
- Bing Hu
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Echocardiography, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China, Shanghai Acoustics Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200233, P.R. China, Institute of Acoustics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China, Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated 6th People’s Hospital, Shanghai 200233, P.R. China
Published online on: October 15, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2654
Pages: 3282-3288

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate whether low frequency low energy ultrasound combined with microbubbles induces apoptotic cell death of A7r5 rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, and to identify the possible mechanisms underlying this effect. Ultrasonic waves (45 kHz with 0.3 Wcm2 of intensity for 0, 10, 20 and 30 sec) were used together with different dosages of SonoVue™ microbubbles (0, 14, 28, 42 and 56 µl), respectively. The cell viability and apoptotic rate were determined by trypan blue staining immediately following treatment and flow cytometry 24 h thereafter. The treatment conditions resulting in the lowest amount of necrosis, highest apoptotic rate and lowest microbubble dosage was selected for the US+MB group, which was treated with ultrasound combined with microbubbles. The cell proliferation 24 h following treatment was determined and western blot analysis was applied to examine the expression of apoptosis‑associated proteins, B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‑2) and Bcl-2-associated X (Bax). The harmonic acoustic pressure amplitude was measured to obtain the cavitation intensity. The combination of 20 sec ultrasound irradiation and 14 µl SonoVue™ was selected as the treatment conditions for the US+MB group. The results demonstrated that both ultrasound alone (the US group) and in combination with microbubbles significantly inhibited the proliferation of A7r5 cells compared with that of the control (P<0.01), and the suppression in the US+MB group was significantly greater (P<0.01). The apoptotic rate in A7r5 cells induced by this combination treatment (16.62±0.93%) was significantly higher than that in the control (3.93±0.39%; P<0.01) and US (6.88±1.87%; P<0.01) groups. Treatment with ultrasound combined with microbubbles increased the expression of Bax and decreased the ratio of Bcl‑2/Bax compared with those in the control and US groups. The cavitation induced by ultrasound combined with microbubble treatment was more intense than that by ultrasound alone. The results demonstrated that the cell death and apoptosis of A7r5 cells were associated with ultrasound duration and microbubble dosage. Low frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles induced apoptosis in A7r5 cells through the upregulation of Bax and the downregulation of the Bcl‑2/Bax ratio, where the cavitation effect may have an important role.

View Figures

View References

1	Reimers B, Moussa I, Akiyama T, et al: Long-term clinical follow-up after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 30:186–192. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Kaufman GE, Miller MW, Griffiths TD, et al: Lysis and viability of cultured mammalian cells exposed to 1MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 3:21–25. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Ellwart JW, Brettel H and Kober LO: Cell membrane damage by ultrasound at different cell concentrations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 14:43–50. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Fahnestock M, Rimer VG, Yamawaki RM, et al: Effects of ultrasound exposure in vitro on neuroblastoma cell membranes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 15:133–144. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Clarke PR and Hill CR: Physical and chemical aspects of ultrasonic disruption of cells. J Acoust Soc Am. 47:649–653. 1970. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Carstensen EL, Kelly P, Church CC, et al: Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 19:147–165. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Miller DL and Williams AR: Bubble cycling as the explanation of the promotion of ultrasound in a rotating tube exposure system. Ultrasound Med Biol. 15:641–648. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Thacker J: An approach to the mechanism of killing of cells in suspension by ultrasound. Biochim Biophys Acta. 304:240–248. 1973. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Al-Mahrouki AA, Karshafian R, Giles A and Czarnota GJ: Bioeffects of ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles on endothelial cells: gene expression changes associated with radiation enhancement in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 38:1958–1969. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
10	Feril LB Jr, Kondo T, Zhao QL, et al: Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29:331–337. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Zhang B, Zhou HS, Cheng Q, Lei L and Hu B: Low-frequency ultrasound induces apoptosis of rat aortic smooth muscle cells (A7r5) via the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Genet Mol Res. 13:3143–3153. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Rokhina EV, Lens P and Virkutyte J: Low-frequency ultrasound in biotechnology: state of the art. Trends Biotechnol. 27:298–306. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Wang Y, Hu B, Diao X and Zhang J: Antitumor effect of microbubbles enhanced by low frequency ultrasound cavitation on prostate carcinoma xenografts in nude mice. Exp Ther Med. 3:187–191. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
14	Man J, Shelton RM, Cooper PR and Scheven BA: Low-intensity low-frequency ultrasound promotes proliferation and differentiation of odontoblast-like cells. J Endod. 38:608–613. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Lagneaux L, de Meulenaer EC, Delforge A, et al: Ultrasonic low-energy treatment: a novel approach to induce apoptosis in human leukemic cells. Exp Hematol. 30:1293–1301. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Furusawa Y, Zhao QL, Hassan MA, et al: Ultrasound-induced apoptosis in the presence of Sonazoid and associated alterations in gene expression levels: a possible therapeutic application. Cancer Lett. 288:107–115. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
17	Hauptmann M, Brems S, Struyf H, et al: Time-resolved monitoring of cavitation activity in megasonic cleaning systems. Rev Sci Instrum. 83:0349042012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Sicklick JK, Li YX, Jayaraman A, et al: Dysregulation of the Hedgehog pathway in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 27:748–757. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Gormley G and Wu J: Observation of acoustic streaming near Albunex spheres. J Acoust Soc Am. 104:3115–3118. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar
20	Jackson JK, Pirmoradi FN, Wan CP, et al: Increased accumulation of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in proliferating capillary cells and prostate cancer cells following ultrasound exposure. Ultrasonics. 51:932–939. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Kawai N and Iino M: Molecular damage to membrane proteins induced by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29:609–614. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Marentis TC, Kusler B, Yaralioglu GG, et al: Microfluidic sonicator for real-time disruption of eukaryotic cells and bacterial spores for DNA analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 31:1265–1277. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Hutcheson JD, Schlicher RK, Hicks HK and Prausnitz MR: Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 36:1008–1021. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
24	Tabuchi Y, Takasaki I, Zhao QL, et al: Genetic networks responsive to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in human lymphoma U937 cells. Cancer Lett. 270:286–294. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Coffin AB, Williamson KL, Mamiya A, et al: Profiling drug-induced cell death pathways in the zebrafish lateral line. Apoptosis. 18:393–408. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Barazzone C and White CW: Mechanisms of cell injury and death in hyperoxia: role of cytokines and Bcl-2 family proteins. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 22:517–519. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Adams JM and Cory S: The Bcl-2 protein family: arbiters of cell survival. Science. 281:1322–1326. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI