Effects of A2BR on the biological behavior of mouse renal fibroblasts during hypoxia

  • Authors:
    • Jin Tang
    • Xianzhen Jiang
    • Yihong Zhou
    • Yingbo Dai
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 9, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3320
  • Pages: 4397-4402
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Fibroblasts are the effector cells of collagen secretion in renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF), and their proliferation and activation are essential for the development of RIF. Hypoxic ischemia in local tissues has been identified in chronic kidney diseases (CKDs), with adenosine (ADO) as a key signaling molecule. The current study investigated the association between ADO and the biological behavior of renal fibroblasts by establishing an in vitro hypoxia cell model. This aimed to provide experimental evidence for the prevention and treatment of RIF. NIH3T3 fibroblasts were exposed to hypoxia, and the subtypes of the ADO receptor (AR) on the cell surface were identified by a TaqMan probe‑based assay. Cells were divided into the following four groups: i) Control; ii) 5'‑N‑ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA); iii) PT, NECA + 8‑phenyltheophylline (PT); and iv) MRS, NECA + N‑(4‑cyanophenyl)‑2‑[4‑(2,3,6,7‑tetrahydro‑2,6‑dioxo‑1,3‑dipropyl‑1H‑purin‑8‑yl)phenoxy]‑acetamide (MRS1754). The mRNA levels of transforming growth factor‑β1 (TGF‑β1), procollagen α1 (I) and α‑smooth muscle actin (α‑SMA) were measured following 24, 48, and 72 h of hypoxia. Cell proliferation was evaluated by a 3‑(4,5‑dimethylthiazol‑2‑yl)‑2,5‑diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay at 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. The results demonstrated that A2BR was the predominant AR subtype present in hypoxia‑stimulated fibroblasts. NECA significantly induced fibroblast proliferation and upregulated the expression of TGF‑β1, procollagen α1 (I) and α‑SMA mRNA, while 8‑PT and MRS1754 inhibited fibroblast proliferation and downregulated the expression of TGF‑β1, procollagen α1 (I) and α‑SMA mRNA. The blockage of A2BR in hypoxia significantly inhibited the proliferation and activation of fibroblasts, and reduced the production of profibrotic cytokines, thus preventing the generation and development of fibrosis.

Introduction

Renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) is considered to be the outcome of all types of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the common pathway that leads to end-stage renal failure (1). It has been demonstrated that in the process of RIF, renal fibroblasts, the effector cells for collagen secretion, underwent excessive proliferation and phenotypic transformation into myofibroblasts (2,3), resulting in abnormal proliferation of fibroblasts and accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) (46).

It is widely accepted that the loss of peritubular capillaries leads to local hypoxic ischemia during RIF. Adenosine (ADO) is a key factor in hypoxic ischemia-induced signal transduction via binding to the ADO receptor (AR) on the cell surface (7,8). A previous study in the mouse unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model demonstrated that in addition to occlusion, the kidney exhibited hypoxic aggravation, ADO elevation and interstitial collagen accumulation, finally resulting in RIF (9). It was hypothesized that the binding of ADO with AR under hypoxia triggered a series of pathological alterations in fibroblasts, further inducing the progression of RIF. In the present study, an in vitro mouse fibroblast model was used to investigate the effects and related mechanism of the ADO signaling pathway in RIF development.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Cells from the mouse renal fibroblast cell line NIH3T3 (third/fourth passage) (Promab Biotechnologies, Inc., Changsha, China) were divided into the following four groups: i) Control; ii) 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine, NECA (cat. no. 1691, Tocris Bioscience, Minneapolis, MN, USA); iii) PT, NECA + 8-phenyltheophylline (PT) (cat. no. 2795, Tocris Bioscience); and iv) MRS, NECA + N-(4-cyanopheny l)-2-[4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purin-8-yl)phenoxy]-acetamide (MRS1754) (cat. no. 2752, Tocris Bioscience). NECA was used as an analogue of ADO with in vitro instability. The cells were detected following incubation for 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. The drug concentrations were as follows: NECA, analogue of ADO, 20 μM; 8-PT, AR blocker, 20 μM, and MRS1754, A2BR antagonist, 20 μM.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

RT-qPCR primers were designed by Premier, version 3.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and synthesized by ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc. The primer sequences are listed in Table I.

Table I

Primer sequences.

Table I

Primer sequences.

GenePrimer sequence (5′ to 3′)Amplified fragment length (bp)Annealing temperature (°C)
α1 (I) procollagen-F GTTCTCCTGGCAAAGACGGA19958
α1 (I) procollagen-R CGGCCACCATCTTGAGACTT
TGF-β1-F AGGGCTACCATGCCAACTTC16858
TGF-β1-R CCACGTAGTAGACGATGGGC
α-SMA-F GGACTCTGGAGATGGTGTGAC16758
α-SMA-R CAATCTCACGCTCGGCAGTA
GAPDH (mouse)-F AACTTTGGCATTGTGGAAGG13258/59
GAPDH (mouse)-R GGATGCAGGGATGATGTTCT

[i] TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; α-SMA; α-smooth muscle actin; bp, base pairs.

Fibroblast total RNA was isolated by the single-step method using TRIzol (15596-026; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RiboLock™ Ribonuclease Inhibitor (EO0381; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) was used to remove genomic DNA. The reverse transcription reaction was performed using the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (K1631; Thermo Fisher Scientific). SYBR® Green master mix (4309155; Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for the RT-qPCR assay of target genes.

Fibroblast cell surface AR types were identified under hypoxia (1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2) by TaqMan probe-based analysis using JumpStart Taq Ready Mix kit (P2893; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Primer and probe sequences of A1R, A2AR, A2BR, A3R and β-actin mRNA are shown in Table II (1012).

Table II

AR primer and probe sequences.

Table II

AR primer and probe sequences.

GenePrimer sequence (5′ to 3′)Annealing temperature (°C)
A1R F-GTTTGGCTGGAACAACCTGA
R-ACACTTGATCACGGGCTCC
Probe: FAM-AACAAGCCTGGATAGCCAACGGCA
57
A2AR F-CCCCTTCATCTACGCCTACAG
R-GTGGGTTCGGATGATCTTCC
Probe: FAM-TCCGGGAGTTCCGCCAGACCT
56
A2BR F-GCGAGAGGGATCATTGCTG
R-CAGGAACGGAGTCAATCCAA
Probe: FAM-CCTCTGGGTCCTTGCCTTTGGC
56
A3R F-ATACCAGATGTCGCAATGTGC
R-GCAGGCGTAGACAATAGGGTT
Probe: FAM-CATGGAGTTCGCGTGGGACAACAG
56
β-actin F-GCTCTGGCTCCTAGCACCAT
R-CCACCGATCCACACAGAGTAC
Probe: FAM-ATCAAGATCATTGCTCCTCCTGAGCGC
60

[i] AR, adenosine receptor.

The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 40 cycles of 94°C (20 sec), 58°C (20 sec) and 72°C (30 sec), using an ABI Prism® 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies). PCR quantification was conducted as previously described (13).

Cell proliferation assay

The 3-(4,5-dimethylthi-azol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (MTT Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Detection kit; Keygen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was performed to determine the cell growth curve. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate with 1×104 cells/well and were subjected to hypoxia (1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2) for 24 h. Following incubation with the drugs described above, MTT and dimethyl sulfoxide were added sequentially and the optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm (DNM-9606 Enzyme Mark Analyzer; Perlong Medical, Beijing, China).

Cell-survival rate calculation: Cell-survival rate (%) = (ODsample − ODblank)/(ODcontrol − ODblank) × 100. ODblank refers to the value of culture medium mixed with MTT without cells. In addition, the cells were visualized microscopically (GX51; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and all data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. To analyze the differences between groups, Student’s t-test for two groups, analysis of variance for multiple group comparisons, and Tukey’s test for repeated measures were conducted. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

AR expression under hypoxia

The TaqMan probe-based assay demonstrated that the predominantly expressed AR on mouse renal fibroblasts under conditions of hypoxia was the A2BR subtype (Fig. 1).

Expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), procollagen α1 (I) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)
TGF-β1 mRNA expression

Fig. 2A demonstrates that a significant increase in the levels of TGF-β1 mRNA was observed in fibroblasts under hypoxia in the NECA group (P<0.01). However, the PT and MRS groups were identified to have significantly lower expression levels than the NECA group (P<0.05) at days 2 and 3. No significant differences were observed between the PT and MRS treatment groups (P>0.05).

Procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression

Fig. 2B demonstrates that NECA significantly increased the levels of procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression (P<0.01). Compared with NECA, procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression was significantly reduced following PT or MRS treatment on days 2 and 3 (P<0.05). PT and MRS however, were not identified to significantly influence procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression levels (P>0.05), and no differences were observed between the PT and MRS groups (P>0.05).

α-SMA mRNA expression

As presented in Fig. 2C, the stimulation of NECA significantly induced the expression of α-SMA (P<0.01). Compared with the control group, there was no effect of PT or MRS on α-SMA mRNA expression levels (P>0.05), which were significantly lower than in the NECA group (P<0.05). No significant differences were identified between the PT and MRS treatment groups (P>0.05). Proliferation of fibroblasts. Proliferation of renal fibroblasts was measured following 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h of hypoxia in triplicate (Fig. 3).

The cell survival rates of each group are presented in Fig. 4. Compared with the control group, NECA significantly induced renal fibroblast proliferation at 48 and 72 h (P<0.001). The addition of 8-PT or MRS 1754 was able to reverse the NECA-induced increase in renal fibroblast proliferation at 24, 48 and 72 h (P<0.01).

Discussion

Fibroblast proliferation and activation are closely associated with RIF development. Fibroblasts embedded within the renal interstitium synthesize various components of the ECM, including type I collagen, type III collagen and fibronectin (14). The majority of fibroblasts exist in a quiescent state and a small proportion remain active in order to repair damaged tissues (15). However, in pathological conditions, including hypoxic ischemia, inflammation and tissue damage, the excretion of cytokines and ECM results in excessive fibroblast proliferation and transdifferentiation to activated myofibroblasts. As a result of the enhanced collagen production by myofibroblasts, the ECM accumulation hinders normal renal function and results in the development of RIF. In this pathological process, fibroblast proliferation and activation are key to the development of RIF.

ADO is a chemical that is naturally present in all cells and an increase in the cytoplasmic ADO concentration under hypoxic ischemia is considered as a response to stress (1618). There are two key sources of cellular ADO: The degradation of ADO triphosphate, and the dephosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate, which is produced by the extracellular adenine nucleotide metabolism (19). Extracellular ADO exerts its biological effects by binding with AR on the cell surface. Three types and four subtypes of AR have been identified, including A1R, A2AR, A2BR and A3R (20). ADO has been reported to have vasodilatory effects in the majority of organs (21), and protects against tissue damage during acute ischemic injury in the heart (22), brain (23), liver (24) and kidney (25). However, extended exposure to a high concentration of ADO has been demonstrated to lead to tissue damage and increased organ dysfunction (26). In previous studies, it has been identified that extracellular ADO continually increases during RIF, and ADO serves an important function in RIF development and kidney dysfunction (9,27). AR inhibitors, such as PT, have been demonstrated to protect kidney function in UUO mice (9,27,28). In order to further understand the function of the AR in RIF development, a hypoxia mouse renal fibroblast model was generated in the current study, in order to dynamically investigate the function of ADO and the associated AR. In the present study, it was observed that A2BR was the predominant receptor type on the surface of the fibroblasts under hypoxia. The specific A2BR inhibitor MRS1754 produced similar effects to the global AR inhibitor 8-PT in renal fibroblast proliferation inhibition (P>0.05), indicating that A2BR was the predominant AR type during hypoxia and ADO increased fibroblast proliferation by binding with A2BR.

During the development of RIF, fibroblasts exhibit smooth muscle cell-like characteristics following a specific transformation, producing myofibroblasts (29). In addition, α-SMA is a known marker of this fibroblast phenotypic transformation (30). Data obtained from animals and humans have clarified the common process of phenotypic transformation of fibroblasts expressing α-SMA into myofibroblasts during CKD development (3135). As the active form, myofibroblast are important in the progression of fibrosis, by inducing excessive ECM accumulation (36,37). The data from the current study demonstrated that compared with the control group, NECA significantly increased α-SMA mRNA expression levels (P<0.01). Compared with the NECA group, NECA combined with 8-PT or MRS1754 reversed the NECA-induced upregulation of α-SMA mRNA (P<0.05). The inhibition of global AR or A2BR was able to reduce transformation of the fibroblast phenotype, leading to the delay of RIF development and protection of kidney function. No significant differences were observed between 8-PT and MRS1754 in α-SMA expression, indicating that A2BR was the predominant AR type responsible for fibroblast transdifferentiation during hypoxia.

A previous study investigated the involvement of the cytokine regulation network in the development of RIF (38). Under hypoxic ischemia, large quantities of cytokines and chemotactic factors are excreted from stressed cells, resulting in structural alterations and dysfunction of the renal tissue. In the current study, two verified profibrotic cytokines, TGF-β1 and procollagen α1 (I), were investigated. The results demonstrated that compared with the control group, NECA significantly increased TGF-β1 mRNA expression levels (P<0.01), while 8-PT and MRS1754 were able to reverse NECA-induced upregulation of TGF-β1 mRNA (P<0.05). Similar results were observed in the evaluation of procollagen α1 (I) levels. The results suggested that under hypoxia, ADO may accelerate RIF development by inducing the excretion of pro-fibrotic cytokines. However, the inhibition of global AR or A2BR was only able to effectively alleviate disease by inhibiting cytokine synthesis. No significant differences were observed between 8-PT and MRS1754 treatment in the levels of TGF-β1 and procollagen α1 (I) regulation, indicating that A2BR was the predominant receptor type for fibroblast profibrotic cytokine excretion under hypoxia.

In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that ADO was important in the regulation of biological behavior in fibroblasts, and A2BR was identified as the predominant receptor type on the surface of fibroblasts under conditions of hypoxia. The inhibition of A2BR significantly reduced the proliferation and activation of fibroblasts, and reduced the excretion of profibrotic cytokines, thus preventing RIF development. The current study suggests that A2BR may be a novel target in the treatment of RIF.

Acknowledgments

The current study was supported by the Science and Technology program of Hunan Scientific Committee (grant no. 2012FJ3134) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81470925).

References

1 

Noronha IL, Fujihara CK and Zatz R: The inflammatory component in progressive renal disease - are interventions possible? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 17:363–368. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Badid C, Vincent M, Fouque D, Laville M and Desmoulière A: Myofibroblast: A prognostic marker and target cell in progressive renal disease. Ren Fail. 23:543–549. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Roberts IS, Burrows C, Shanks JH, Venning M and McWilliam LJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts: Predictors of progression in membranous nephropathy. J Clin Pathol. 50:123–127. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Razzaque MS and Taguchi T: Cellular and molecular events leading to renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Med Electron Microsc. 35:68–80. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zeisberg M, Strutz F and Müller GA: Renal fibrosis: An update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 10:315–320. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Eddy AA: Molecular basis of renal fibrosis. Pediatr Nephrol. 15:290–301. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Fredholm BB: Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repair. Cell Death Differ. 14:1315–1323. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Eltzschig HK, Thompson LF, Karhausen J, Cotta RJ, Ibla JC, Robson SC and Colgan SP: Endogenous adenosine produced during hypoxia attenuates neutrophil accumulation: Coordination by extracellular nucleotide metabolism. Blood. 104:3986–3992. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Tang J, Jiang X, Zhou Y, Xia B and Dai Y: Increased adenosine levels contribute to ischemic kidney fibrosis in the unilateral ureteral obstruction model. Exp Ther Med. 9:737–743. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Chunn JL, Mohsenin A, Young HW, Lee CG, Elias JA, Kellems RE and Blackburn MR: Partially adenosine deaminase-deficient mice develop pulmonary fibrosis in association with adenosine elevations. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 290:L579–L587. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Chunn JL, Molina JG, Mi T, Xia Y, Kellems RE and Blackburn MR: Adenosine-dependent pulmonary fibrosis in adenosine deaminase-deficient mice. J Immunol. 175:1937–1946. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Chunn JL, Young HW, Banerjee SK, Colasurdo GN and Blackburn MR: Adenosine-dependent airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in partially adenosine deaminase-deficient mice. J Immunol. 167:4676–4685. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Strutz F and Zeisberg M: Renal fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 17:2992–2998. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Chen CZ and Raghunath M: Focus on collagen: in vitro systems to study fibrogenesis and antifibrosis state of the art. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2:72007. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Blackburn MR, Volmer JB, Thrasher JL, Zhong H, Crosby JR, Lee JJ and Kellems RE: Metabolic consequences of adenosine deaminase deficiency in mice are associated with defects in alveogenesis, pulmonary inflammation, and airway obstruction. J Exp Med. 192:159–170. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Linden J: Adenosine in tissue protection and tissue regeneration. Mol Pharmacol. 67:1385–1387. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Van Belle H, Goossens F and Wynants J: Formation and release of purine catabolites during hypoperfusion, anoxia, and ischemia. Am J Physiol. 252:H886–H893. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Rego AC, Santos MS and Oliveira CR: Adenosine triphosphate degradation products after oxidative stress and metabolic dysfunction in cultured retinal cells. J Neurochem. 69:1228–1235. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wei CJ, Li W and Chen JF: Normal and abnormal functions of adenosine receptors in the central nervous system revealed by genetic knockout studies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1808:1358–1379. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Mi T, Abbasi S, Zhang H, et al: Excess adenosine in murine penile erectile tissues contributes to priapism via A2B adenosine receptor signaling. J Clin Invest. 118:1491–1501. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Rudolphi KA, Schubert P, Parkinson FE and Fredholm BB: Adenosine and brain ischemia. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 4:346–369. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Schubert P, Rudolphi KA, Fredholm BB and Nakamura Y: Modulation of nerve and glial function by adenosine - role in the development of ischemic damage. Int J Biochem. 26:1227–1236. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zhu JF, Tang LM and Li DC: Activation of adenosine 2A receptor attenuating oxidative stress on small-for-size liver transplantation. Chin J Bases And Clin In Gen Surg. 17:243–247. 2010.

25 

Grenz A, Osswald H, Eckle T, Yang D, Zhang H, Tran ZV, Klingel K, Ravid K and Eltzschig HK: The reno-vascular A2B adenosine receptor protects the kidney from ischemia. PLoS Med. 5:e1372008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Lu Q, Sakhatskyy P, Newton J, et al: Sustained adenosine exposure causes lung endothelial apoptosis: a possible contributor to cigarette smoke-induced endothelial apoptosis and lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 304:L361–L370. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Yap SC and Lee HT: Adenosine and protection from acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 21:24–32. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

28 

Mubagwa K and Flameng W: Adenosine, adenosine receptors and myocardial protection: an updated overview. Cardiovasc Res. 52:25–39. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Leask A: Towards an anti-fibrotic therapy for scleroderma: targeting myofibroblast differentiation and recruitment. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 3:82010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Malmström J, Lindberg H, Lindberg C, et al: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 specifically induce proteins involved in the myofibroblast contractile apparatus. Mol Cell Proteomics. 3:466–477. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Ohtaka A, Ootaka T, Sato H and Ito S: Phenotypic change of glomerular podocytes in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: Developmental paradigm. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 17(Suppl 9): 11–15. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Jinde K, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Huang XR, Sakai H, Kurokawa K, Atkins RC and Lan HY: Tubular phenotypic change in progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis in human glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 38:761–769. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Johnson RJ, Iida H, Alpers CE, Majesky MW, Schwartz SM, Pritzi P, Gordon K and Gown AM: Expression of smooth muscle cell phenotype by rat mesangial cells in immune complex nephritis. Alpha-smooth muscle actin is a marker of mesangial cell proliferation. J Clin Invest. 87:847–858. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Ng YY, Fan JM, Mu W, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Yang WC, Huang TP, Atkins RC and Lan HY: Glomerular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the evolution of glomerular crescent formation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 14:2860–2872. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Eddy AA: Molecular insights into renal interstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 7:2495–2508. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

36 

Zhang G, Moorhead PJ and el Nahas AM: Myofibroblasts and the progression of experimental glomerulonephritis. Exp Nephrol. 3:308–318. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Hewitson TD, Wu HL and Becker GJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts in experimental renal infection and scarring. Am J Nephrol. 15:411–417. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ling H, Li X, Jha S, Wang W, Karetskaya L, Pratt B and Ledbetter S: Therapeutic role of TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody in mouse cyclosporin A nephropathy: Morphologic improvement associated with functional preservation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 14:377–388. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2015
Volume 11 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tang J, Jiang X, Zhou Y and Dai Y: Effects of A2BR on the biological behavior of mouse renal fibroblasts during hypoxia. Mol Med Rep 11: 4397-4402, 2015
APA
Tang, J., Jiang, X., Zhou, Y., & Dai, Y. (2015). Effects of A2BR on the biological behavior of mouse renal fibroblasts during hypoxia. Molecular Medicine Reports, 11, 4397-4402. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3320
MLA
Tang, J., Jiang, X., Zhou, Y., Dai, Y."Effects of A2BR on the biological behavior of mouse renal fibroblasts during hypoxia". Molecular Medicine Reports 11.6 (2015): 4397-4402.
Chicago
Tang, J., Jiang, X., Zhou, Y., Dai, Y."Effects of A2BR on the biological behavior of mouse renal fibroblasts during hypoxia". Molecular Medicine Reports 11, no. 6 (2015): 4397-4402. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3320