Golgi phosphoprotein 3 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy

  • Authors:
    • Longyang Zhang
    • Feng Guo
    • Xinghua Gao
    • Yanlin Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 9, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3455
  • Pages: 1298-1304
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3) has recently been implicated as an oncogene involved in the development of carcinoma in a number of organs. The expression of GOLPH3 in prostate cancer (PCa) tissues was investigated in the present study. Human PC‑3 and LNCaP PCa cell lines were analyzed in order to assess whether silencing of GOLPH3 expression affects cell vitality, migration and invasion, in vitro. An immunohistochemistry analysis was performed in order to measure the expression of GOLPH3 in samples from 117 patients with PCa and from 50 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Associations between GOLPH3 expression and clinicopathological parameters, such as overall survival, were assessed. GOLPH3 expression was shown to be significantly greater in PCa tissues than in BPH tissues. GOLPH3 expression was positively correlated with Gleason score (P=0.031), tumor stage (T stage; P=0.020) and lymph node status (P=0.013), in patients with PCa. Biochemical recurrence‑free survival (serum prostate‑specific antigen‑based) and overall survival, were reduced in patients with GOLPH3‑positive PCa. A multivariate analysis indicated that GOLPH3 expression was an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence‑free survival [hazard ratio (HR), 2.943; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.190‑5.521; P=0.028], and of overall survival (HR, 4.371; 95% CI, 2.045‑7.109; P=0.014). Transfection with GOLPH3‑targeted small interfering RNA reduced the capability of PC‑3 and LNCaP cell lines to proliferate, migrate and invade in vitro, compared with the controls. The level of GOLPH3 expression in radical prostatectomy samples may be useful for predicting biochemical recurrence‑free survival and overall survival in patients with PCa.

Introduction

Each year, approximately 230,000 American males are diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) and nearly 30,000 die from this disease (1,2). However, for the majority of patients, the disease is detected at the local or regional stages, meaning that long-term prognosis is typically good (3). Radical prostatectomy is the selected treatment for 50% of patients with PCa, of which approximately 40% exhibit aggressive clinicopathological features, such as a high Gleason score, invasion of the seminal vesicles or lymph node involvement. These features are associated with an increased risk of metastatic disease (46). Approximately 15% of patients with PCa are at risk of death, many receive potentially unnecessary additional postoperative interventions, such as adjuvant radiation (7). Therefore, they often experience treatment-associated morbidity (8). Furthermore, PCa-associated mortality has been observed in patients who do not exhibit adverse clinical features. Current methods for predicting the risk of metastasis and mortality in patients with PCa are insufficient (9). Therefore, specific genetic markers are required in order to develop prognostic indicators for patients with PCa.

Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3), a member of the trans-golgi matrix family, has recently been demonstrated to act as an oncogene in carcinoma of the lung, ovary, breast, colon and prostate, and in melanoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and glioma (1013). GOLPH3 overexpression has been reported to promote cell proliferation and tumorigenesis via activation of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling, which enhances protein kinase B activity and decreases transcriptional activity of the forkhead box protein O gene (10,14,15). However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have investigated the association between GOLPH3 expression and the survival of patients with PCa. In the present study, immunohistochemical staining of PCa and control prostate tissues was performed, in order to evaluate the expression of GOLPH3, and to analyze the association between GOLPH3 expression and clinicopathological factors in patients with PCa.

Materials and methods

Patients and prostate specimens

PCa samples (117) were obtained from patients with an average age of 62.4 years and a range of 48–77 years between 1999 and 2012 at the Department of Urology, Jinan Central Hospital of Shandong University (Jinan, China). Patients had undergone radical prostatectomy between January 1999–2012. The control resections were obtained from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), comprising 50 age-matched patients examined during the same period. Samples were resected from areas of invasive adenocarcinoma, which had been pathologically identified according to a hematoxylin and eosin staining pattern. Tumor grade and clinical stage of the samples were assessed according to the 2002 TNM classification and the Gleason system (16).

Follow-up

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were evaluated postoperatively every three months during the first year, every six months from the second to the fifth year, and then annually from the sixth year. Follow-up data were obtained by consulting medical records held by the hospital and the departmental database of patients with PCa, and by contacting the patients or their family members. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a sustained elevation of the total serum PSA level (>0.2 ng/ml) on ≥2 occasions. The biochemical recurrence date was recorded as the time that the first value was >0.2 ng/ml. Follow-up time ranged from 6 to 171 months. Patients provided informed consent. The present study was approved by the Jinan Central Hospital of Shandong University Ethical Committee (Jinan, China).

Immunohistochemistry analysis

Tissue sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized, hydrated and incubated in water with 3% H2O2 (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for 30 min in order to destroy endogenous peroxidases. Antigen retrieval was performed by immersing sections in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0; Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) and heating in a microwave for 30 min at 95°C. Non-specific binding to sections was blocked with normal goat serum [5% (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) in phosphate-buffered saline (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.)] for 1 h. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with a polyclonal rabbit GOLPH3 antibody (1:100; ab91492; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight, at 4°C. For the negative control, 5% normal goat serum without a primary antibody was used. Staining was detected using a polyclonal secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit IgG antibody (1:2,000; ab6721; Abcam) followed by hematoxylin counter-staining. Positive staining was defined as brown oxidized 3,3′-diaminobenzidine in cellular compartments, without background signal. The stained sections were evaluated by two pathologists, unaware of patient clinical information, using light microscopy (SZ51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Immunostaining scores for GOLPH3 were determined using a numeric intensity score of 0–3: 0, no staining; 1 +, weak staining; 2 +, moderate staining and 3 +, strong staining. Staining was also dichotomized into negative and positive. Negative was scored if 0 or 1+ and positive was scored if 2+ or 3+.

Cell culture and small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection

PC-3 and LNCaP human PCa cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were cultured in an RPMI1640 medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT, USA) in 5% CO2, at 37°C. GOLPH3-siRNA and non-specific control siRNA (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were transfected into PC-3 and LNCaP cells using Lipofectamine 2000® (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blot analysis

Total protein was extracted from cultured cells. Equal amounts of protein (60 μg) were subjected to electrophoresis using a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, Inc.) then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Non-specific binding to membranes was blocked using 5% non-fat milk prior to incubation with polyclonal rabbit anti-GOLPH3 (1:1,000; ab91492; CA, Abcam) or monoclonal rabbit anti-GAPDH antibodies (1:2,000; ab181602; Abcam) overnight, at 4°C. The membranes were washed and incubated with specific peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Specific proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Cell vitality, migration and invasion assays

The effect of transfection on cell growth was determined by seeding 4,000 cells/well into a 96-well plate and counting cell numbers 5 days later using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide reagent (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cell migratory and invasive capability levels were measured using Transwell assays. Transfected cells (1×104; in fetal bovine serum-free medium) were plated in the upper chambers of a Transwell plate (Corning Life Sciences, Union City, CA, USA). Lower chambers were filled with a medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cell invasion assays were performed similar to the cell growth assays. However, the Transwell membranes were coated with Matrigel® (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), prior to adding the cells. At 24 h, cells were removed from the upper chambers by swabbing, and those that had moved into the lower chambers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet (both from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.). The number of cells in five independent fields of view for each well was recorded and photographed.

Statistical analysis

A χ2 test was performed in order to analyze the association between GOLPH3 expression and clinicopathological features of the patients with PCa. Survival data were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Clinical parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models in SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Associations between GOLPH3 expression and clinical parameters in patients with PCa

GOLPH3 protein expression was assessed immunohistochemically in 117 tissues from patients with PCa and in 50 BPH tissues from age-matched controls. As shown in Table I, 54 of the 117 PCa tissues (56%) were classified as GOLPH3-positive (Fig. 1).

Table I

Clinicopathological features of prostate cancer patients according to GOLPH3 status.

Table I

Clinicopathological features of prostate cancer patients according to GOLPH3 status.

FeaturesGOLPH3 positiveGOLPH3 negativeP-value
Patient (n)5463
Serum PSA level (ng/ml)0.779
 <102529
 ≥102934
Gleason score0.031
 ≤61938
 ≥73525
T stage0.020
 T1-T23554
 T3-T4199
Lymph node status0.013
  (−)3353
  (+)2110
Surgical margin status0.812
  (−)3543
  (+)1920

[i] GOLPH3, Golgi phosphoprotein 3; T stage, tumor stage; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.

Analyses of associations between GOLPH3 expression and clinical and prognostic parameters, shown in Table I, demonstrated that GOLPH3 expression was positively correlated with Gleason score (P=0.031), T stage (P=0.020) and lymph node status (P=0.013).

Association between GOLPH3 expression and patient survival

Results of the Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests suggested that GOLPH3-positive patients exhibited a shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival time compared with GOLPH3-negative patients (Fig. 2A). GOLPH3-positive patients also demonstrated significantly shorter overall survival rates (Fig. 2B).

Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that positive GOLPH3 expression was significantly correlated with poorer biochemical recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR), 2.943; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.190–5.521; P=0.028, Table II], and overall survival (HR, 4.371; 95% CI, 2.045–7.109; P=0.014, Table III). These results suggested that GOLPH3 expression may be useful as a prognostic indicator for patients with PCa.

Table II

Correlations of clinical variables and GOLPH3 expression with biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Table II

Correlations of clinical variables and GOLPH3 expression with biochemical recurrence-free survival.

VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P -value
Preoperative PSA
 <10 vs. ≥100.696 (0.462–1.189)0.496
Gleason score
 ≤6 vs. ≥71.917 (1.014–3.512)0.0211.037 (0.521–1.689)0.219
T stage
 ≤2 vs. ≥32.192 (1.334–4.328)0.0191.663 (0.752–2.436)0.097
Lymph node status
 + vs. −1.029 (0.570–1.968)0.837
Surgical margin status
 + vs. −1.251 (0.706–2.429)0.296
GOLPH3 expression
 + vs. −4.257 (1.985–7.235)<0.0012.943 (1.190–5.521)0.028

[i] GOLPH3, golgi phosphoprotein 3; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; T stage, tumor stage.

Table III

Correlations of clinical variables and GOLPH3 expression with overall survival.

Table III

Correlations of clinical variables and GOLPH3 expression with overall survival.

VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Preoperative PSA
 <10 vs. ≥100.814 (0.486–2.121)0.642
Gleason score
 ≤6 vs. ≥72.702 (1.209–4.910)0.0251.207 (0.603–2.917)0.389
T stage
 ≤2 vs. ≥3 2.154(1.002–3.506)0.0411.497 (0.477–2.098)0.745
Lymph node status
 + vs. −1.019 (0.414–2.708)0.401
Surgical margin status
 + vs. −1.544 (0.673–3.097)0.120
GOLPH3 expression
 + vs. −4.598 (2.042–12.109)0.0014.371 (2.045–7.109)0.014

[i] GOLPH3, golgi phosphoprotein 3;PSA, prostate-specific antigen; T stage, tumor stage.

Silencing of GOLPH3 reduces proliferation, migration and invasion of PCa cells in vitro

Western blot analysis demonstrated that transfection with GOLPH3-siRNA knocked down GOLPH3 protein expression (Fig. 3A), and MTT assays suggested that the increase in PC-3 and LNCaP cell numbers over five days were significantly reduced following transfection with GOLPH3-siRNA (Fig. 3B and C). Cell migration assays (Fig. 4A) demonstrated that GOLPH3-siRNA transfection significantly reduced the migratory capability of PC-3 and LNCaP cell lines, compared with that in cells transfected with the control siRNA. Furthermore, cell invasion was significantly lower in GOLPH3-siRNA-transfected cell, compared with that in the control siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 4B). These results indicated that GOLPH3 expression may induce PCa cell proliferation, migration and invasion.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the association between GOLPH3 and PCa progression has yet to be investigated. In the present study, positive GOLPH3 expression was observed in 56% of PCa tissues compared with 6% of BPH tissues. In addition, positive GOLPH3 was significantly correlated with impaired biochemical recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Further analysis indicated that GOLPH3 expression is a potential independent factor indicating a poor prognosis in patients with PCa.

The gene encoding GOLPH3 in humans is located on chromosome 5p13 and is expressed in several solid tumor types, including carcinoma of the lung, ovary, breast and skin (10). However, the association between GOLPH3 expression and PCa remains largely unknown. Recent studies have indicated that overexpression of GOLPH3 promotes tumorigenesis and progression in a number of types of malignancies, and is associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. GOLPH3 expression was shown to be present in >50% of the 76 patients with glioma who were studied, and GOLPH3 expression levels were associated with the severity of the tumor, with higher GOLPH3 expression levels observed in higher grade astrocytomas (12). GOLPH3 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in cN0 oral tongue cancer patients and may represent a novel and useful prognostic indicator for cN0 oral tongue cancer (17). The results of a study using cultured glioblastoma multiforme cell lines, suggested that the down-regulation of GOLPH3, using an siRNA, led to the suppression of cell proliferation and clonogenic growth. These observations are in accordance with the findings of an association between high levels of GOLPH3 expression and a poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (18). Markedly higher levels of mRNA and protein GOLPH3 expression were observed in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) cell lines and tissues, compared with control cells (19). Expression of GOLPH3 in patients with ESCC was found to be positively associated with clinical stage, TNM classification and histological differentiation. Furthermore, expression of GOLPH3 is an independent prognostic factor for patients with ESCC (20). In gastric cancer, expression levels of GOLPH3 were found to be positively associated with tumor size, histological grade, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and TNM stage. In a multivariate analysis the level of GOLPH3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer following radical resection (21). In accordance with these findings, the results of the present study suggested that increased positive GOLPH3 staining was observed in PCa tissues compared with that in non-PCa tissues. Furthermore, a positive GOLPH3 staining result was positively associated with Gleason score, T stage and lymph node status. Patients with positive GOLPH3 expression exhibited shorter biochemical recurrence-free, and overall survival. Furthermore, multivariate analyses suggested that GOLPH3 expression was an independent indicator of both biochemical recurrence-free and overall survival. Silencing of GOLPH3 expression inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion capabilities of PC-3 and LNCaP cell lines.

In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that GOLPH3 is involved in the proliferation, migration and invasion of PCa cells. Therefore, GOLPH3 may provide a novel prognostic marker for patients with PCa who have undergone radical prostatectomy.

References

1 

Denmeade SR and Isaacs JT: Development of prostate cancer treatment: the good news. Prostate. 58:211–224. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sarkar D, Lebedeva IV, Su ZZ, et al: Eradication of therapy-resistant human prostate tumors using a cancer terminator virus. Cancer Res. 67:5434–5442. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, Cooper D, Gansler T, Lerro C, et al: Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:220–241. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW and Scardino P: Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol. 167:528–534. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Patel AR and Stephenson AJ: Radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: adjuvant or salvage? Nat Rev Urol. 8:385–392. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Mishra MV, Champ CE, Den RB, Scher ED, Shen X, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD, Knudsen KE, Dicker AP and Showalter TN: Postprostatectomy radiation therapy: an evidence-based review. Future Oncol. 7:1429–1440. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Chang AJ, Autio KA, Roach M III and Scher HI: High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 11:308–323. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Swanson GP and Basler JW: Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy. J Cancer. 2:1–19. 2010.

9 

Crawford ED, Bennett CL, Andriole GL, Garnick MB and Petrylak DP: The utility of prostate-specific antigen in the management of advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int. 112:548–560. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Scott KL, Kabbarah O, Liang MC, Ivanova E, Anagnostou V, et al: GOLPH3 modulates mTOR signalling and rapamycin sensitivity in cancer. Nature. 459:1085–1090. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Kunigou O, Nagao H, Kawabata N, Ishidou Y, Nagano S, et al: Role of GOLPH3 and GOLPH3L in the proliferation of human rhabdomyosarcoma. Oncol Rep. 26:1337–1342. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Li XY, Liu W, Chen SF, Zhang LQ, Li XG and Wang LX: Expression of the Golgi phosphoprotein-3 gene in human gliomas: a pilot study. J Neurooncol. 105:159–163. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Romanuik TL, Wang G, Holt RA, Jones SJ, Marra MA and Sadar MD: Identification of novel androgen-responsive genes by sequencing of LongSAGE libraries. BMC Genomics. 10:4762009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Abraham RT: GOLPH3 links the Golgi network to mTOR signaling and human cancer. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 22:378–379. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Zeng Z, Lin H, Zhao X, Liu G, Wang X, Xu R, Chen K, Li J and Song L: Overexpression of GOLPH3 promotes proliferation and tumorigenicity in breast cancer via suppression of the FOXO1 transcription factor. Clin Cancer Res. 18:4059–4069. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Steuber T, Erbersdobler A, Graefen M, Haese A, Huland H and Karakiewicz PI: Comparative assessment of the 1992 and 2002 pathologic T3 substages for the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 106:775–782. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Li H, Guo L, Chen SW, Zhao XH, Zhuang SM, Wang LP, Song LB and Song M: GOLPH3 overexpression correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with clinically N0 oral tongue cancer. J Transl Med. 10:1682012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zhou J, Xu T, Qin R, et al: Overexpression of Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3) in glioblastoma multiforme is associated with worse prognosis. J Neurooncol. 110:195–203. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Hua X, Yu L, Pan W, Huang X, Liao Z, Xian Q, Fang L and Shen H: Increased expression of Golgi phosphoprotein 3 is associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis of prostate cancer. Diagn Pathol. 7:1272012. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Wang JH, Chen XT, Wen ZS, Zheng M, Deng JM, Wang MZ, Lin HX, Chen K, Li J, et al: High expression of GOLPH3 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with poor prognosis. PLoS One. 7:e456222012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Hu BS, Hu H, Zhu CY, Gu YL and Li JP: Overexpression of GOLPH3 is associated with poor clinical outcome in gastric cancer. Tumor Biol. 34:515–520. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2015
Volume 12 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang L, Guo F, Gao X and Wu Y: Golgi phosphoprotein 3 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Mol Med Rep 12: 1298-1304, 2015
APA
Zhang, L., Guo, F., Gao, X., & Wu, Y. (2015). Golgi phosphoprotein 3 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Molecular Medicine Reports, 12, 1298-1304. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3455
MLA
Zhang, L., Guo, F., Gao, X., Wu, Y."Golgi phosphoprotein 3 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy". Molecular Medicine Reports 12.1 (2015): 1298-1304.
Chicago
Zhang, L., Guo, F., Gao, X., Wu, Y."Golgi phosphoprotein 3 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy". Molecular Medicine Reports 12, no. 1 (2015): 1298-1304. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3455