Trophoblast glycoprotein promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell metastasis through Wnt/planar cell polarity signaling

  • Authors:
    • Ping He
    • Shuheng Jiang
    • Mingze Ma
    • Yang Wang
    • Rongkun Li
    • Fang Fang
    • Guangang Tian
    • Zhigang Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 4, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3412
  • Pages: 503-509
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Trophoblast glycoprotein (TPBG), a 72 kDa glycoprotein was identified using a monoclonal antibody, which specifically binds human trophoblast. The expression of TPBG in normal tissues is limited; however, it is upregulated in numerous types of cancer. When TPBG is expressed at a high level, this usually indicates a poor clinical outcome. In the present study, it was demonstrated that TPBG was more commonly observed in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared with normal pancreatic tissue. Immunohistochemical analysis of PDAC tissue microarrays indicated that the expression of TPBG in PDAC tissues was closely correlated with the tumor‑node‑metastasis stage of the tumor. Silencing of TPBG in PDAC cell lines resulted in a decreased ability of cancer cell migration and invasion. Further investigation demonstrated that the Wnt/planar cell polarity signaling pathway was suppressed, as the expression of Wnt5a and the activation of c‑Jun N‑terminal kinase was inhibited following TPBG knockdown. In conclusion, the present study provided evidence that TPBG is involved in PDAC metastasis, and that TPBG and its associated signaling pathways may be a suitable target for PDAC therapy.

Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), usually referred to as pancreatic cancer, is a highly aggressive malignant tumor. It is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality with an estimated 37,390 fatalities in the USA and 227,000 fatalities globally per year (1). Patients with PDAC usually present with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic disease and the majority of patients suffer significant pain (2). Despite the developments in the detection and management of PDAC, the five-year relative survival rate has not changed (3). Thus, further investigation into this malignant tumor is required.

Trophoblast glycoprotein (TPBG), also termed 5T4, is a 72 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein and an extensively investigated oncofetal antigen, which is limited in normal adult tissues, but highly expressed in various types of cancer in humans (4,5). This expression pattern renders it an attractive target for cancer therapy (6). Southall et al (5) observed that TPBG is highly expressed in tumor tissues, including carcinomas of the bladder, breast, ovaries, pancreas and stomach, as elucidated using immunohistochemical analysis, and was closely associated with poor clinical outcome in colorectal, ovarian and gastric cancer (79). The authors further demonstrated that TPBG not only disrupts cell-cell contacts and induces cellular motility in epithelial cells (10), but also interacts with GAIP-interacting protein C terminus 1, which has implications for tumor metastasis (11).

However, the roles of TPBG in PDAC progression remain to be elucidated. The present study aimed to explore the cellular functions of TPBG in PDAC, and to investigate the associated mechanisms.

Materials and methods

Immunohistochemical staining

The PDAC tissue microarray (OD-CT-DgPan01-006), which contains 81 PDAC tissues, 44 normal pancreatic tissues and 32 chronic pancreatitis tissues was purchased from Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described (12). Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinized gradually using 50% xylene (Meryer, Shanghai, China) and rehydrated. The sections were then incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide (Jianglaibio, Shanghai, China) for 30 min and blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sangon, Shanghai, China). The slides were initially incubated with an antibody targeting TPBG (cat. no. HPA010554; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 4°C overnight with optimal dilution (1:200). The slides were then incubated with a horsradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit secondary antibody (cat. no. 65-6120; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at room temperature for 1 hour. Subsequently, the slides were incubated with diaminobenizidine substrate liquid (Gene Tech Ltd., Shanghai, China), for 2 min and counterstained with hematoxylin (Beyotime Institue of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Then these sections were ehydrated sequentially using 50, 80, 90 and 100% ethanol (Meryer), and 50 and 100% xylene, and covered. The slides were subsequently visualized using Primostar FL2 microscope (CarlZeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Cell culture

The PANC-1 and BxPC-3 human PDAC cell lines were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), and the hTERT-HPNE normal pancreatic duct cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). PANC-1 cells were cultured with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), BxPC-3 cells were cultured with RMPI 1640 (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) and hTERT-HPNE cells were cultured with specific medium recommended by the ATCC [75% glucose-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 25% Medium M3 Base (Gibco Life Technologies)] supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 ng/ml human recombinant epidermal growth factor (PeproTech, New Jersey, NJ, USA), 5.5 mM D-glucose (Gibco Life Technologies) and 750 ng/ml puromycin (Sangon, Shanghai, China)]. All cells were supplemented with 10% FBS (v/v; Gibco Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 units penicillin (Gibco Life Technologies) and 100 μg streptomycin (Gibco Life Technologies) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

Construction of stably interfered TPBG cell lines

Short hairpin (sh)RNAs and control vector were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The packaging of lentiviral particles was performed in HEK293T cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA)following cotransfection with shRNAs with the following sequences: sh-1, 5′-CCGGGGATCACATGGAAGGGTATCACTCGAGTGATACCCTTCCA TGTGATCCTTTTTG-3′ and sh-2, 5′-CCGGGCACAGTCAAGTGCGTTAACCCTCGAGGGTTAACGCACTTGACTGTGCTTTTTG-3′. Control vectors were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The viruses were harvested at 24 and 48 h after transfection. The PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells (1×105) were seeded into 12-well plates and infected with lentivirus in the presence of 6 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich) on the following day. The infected PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells were then selected with medium containing 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sangon Biotech) for 7 days. The puromycin resistant cells were considered to be cells that had undergone stable knockdown of TPBG as verified using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blot analysis.

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan) and reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript RT-PCR kit (Takara Bio Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR analysis was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio Inc.) with the ViiA 7 Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), with the following program: 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 31 sec, and finally 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min an d 95°C for 15 sec. The primer sequences for TPBG and 18S RNA in the present study were as follows: forward: 5′-TGGGTATTGTTTTAGCCCTGAT-3′ and reverse: 5′-GTTGTCCTTGGTCTGTCCTCTA-3′ for TPBG, and forward: 5′-TGCGAGTACTCAACACCAACA-3′ and reverse: 5′-GCATATCTTCGGCCCACA-3′ for 18S RNA. The relative expression of TPBG was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method with 18S RNA as the reference gene.

Western blotting

Total proteins were extracted using an immunoprecipitation lysis buffer (P0013; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and proteins were then separated using reducing SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Subsequently, the membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co.) containing 5% BSA for 1 h. The membrane was incubated with primary antibodies against TPBG (1:500; cat. no. HPA010554; Sigma-Aldrich), Wnt5a (1:1,000; cat. no. 2392; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), ROR2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 4105; Cell Signaling Technology) c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; 1:1,000; cat. no. 9252; Cell Signaling Technology), phospho-JNK (1:1,000; cat. no. 4668; Cell Signaling Technology) and β-actin (1:5,000; cat. no. 20536-1-AP; Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA) overnight and then the membranes were incubated with species-specific secondary antibodies, IRDye 680 anti-mouse (1:20,000; cat. no. 926-68072; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) or IRDye 800 anti-rabbit (1:10,000; cat. no. 926-32213L; LI-COR) to probe the primary antibodies while signals were detected using the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR) as described previously (13).

In vitro cell migration and invasion assays

Transwell migration and invasion assays were performed. For the cell migration assay, 4×104 cells were seeded into the upper compartment of the Transwell inserts (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and the lower compartment was supplemented with 700 μl conditioned medium containing 5% FBS (v/v). The cells remaining in the top chambers or on the upper membrane of the inserts were carefully removed after incubation for 10 h. The cells that migrated to the lower membrane of the inserts were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Subsequently, migrated cells were counted by capturing images of six randomly selected fields through an IX71 inverted microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). A cell invasion assay was performed by adding 100 μl Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA) into the top chamber of the Transwell inserts and placing 4×104 primary cells onto the Matrigel. The cell invasion assay was allowed to continue for 14–20 h and was then terminated and treated according to the cell migration assay described above.

Luciferase reporter assay

Cells were seeded into the 96-well plates and transfected with a mixture of 100 ng ATF2 plasmid (Wnt/PCP signaling) and 10 ng Renilla plasmid according to the manufacturer’s instructions of the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection system. After 48 h of incubation, firefly and Renilla luciferase activity of cell lysates was measured using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The correlation between TPBG expression and the clinicopathological parameters was evaluated using the χ2 test. Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

TPBG is highly expressed in PDAC tissues and cell lines

To observe the change in expression occurring in PDAC, the expression of TPBG was initially identified in a tissue microarray, which contained 81 cases of PDAC. Through immunohistochemical staining, it was revealed that TPBG is highly expressed in cancer tissues compared with the normal pancreatic tissues (Fig. 1). In addition, a high expression of TPBG was closely correlated with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and the age of the patient (Table I). In addition, the expression of TPBG was detected in the hTERT-HPNE normal pancreatic duct cell line and the PANC-1 and BxPC-3 PDAC cell lines. The expression of TPBG was detected at extremely low levels in hTERT-HPNE, while it was highly expressed in the PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cell lines (Fig. 1B).

Table I

Statistical analysis of TPBG expression against clinicopathological parameters of the patient.

Table I

Statistical analysis of TPBG expression against clinicopathological parameters of the patient.

VariableTPBG, n (%)
P-value
HighLow
Sample
 Carcinoma49 (60.49)32 (39.51)
 Normal10 (22.73)34 (77.27)
 Pancreatitis19 (59.38)13 (40.62)0.913
Age (years)0.022
 ≤6028 (73.68)10 (26.32)
 >6021 (48.84)22 (51.16)
Gender0.062
 Female24 (72.73)9 (27.27)
 Male25 (52.08)23 (47.91)
Tumor size (cm)0.051
 ≤414 (46.67)16 (53.33)
 >435 (68.63)16 (31.37)
Tumor location0.45
 Pancreas head36 (84.00)21 (16.00)
 Pancreas body and tail13 (54.17)11 (45.83)
TNM stage0.005
 I18 (45.00)22 (55.00)
 II–III31 (75.61)10 (24.39)

[i] Data in bold indicate P-values with significant differences. TPBG, trophoblast glycoprotein; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.

Expression of TPBG in BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cell lines is significantly decreased following stable silencing

To further investigate the role of TPBG in PDAC carcinogenesis and progression, the BxPC-3 and PANC-1 PDAC cell lines were selected, which highly expressed TPBG, to construct cell lines exhibiting stable knockdown of TPBG. The silencing of TPBG by two shRNAs (sh-1 and sh-2) in the BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells resulted in significant decreases in the expression of TPBG (Fig. 2).

Silencing of TPBG inhibits PDAC cell migration and invasion

Given that TPBG is a gene that is associated with cell motility, a Transwell assay was performed. In the migration assay, it was observed that the motility of the cells was notably decreased following TPBG knockdown (Fig. 3A). In addition, to examine whether TPBG has an affect on the invasive ability of the cells, a cell invasion assay was performed and it was identified that number of cells that invaded through the membrane was also decreased significantly following silencing of TPBG (Fig. 3B).

Wnt/PCP pathway is suppressed following silencing of TPBG

To further investigate the underlying mechanism involved in cell migration and invasion in PDAC, Wnt/PCP signaling was examined, which has been observed to promote cell migration in cancer metastasis (14). Using a luciferase reporter assay, it was identified that Wnt/PCP signaling was inhibited in the cells subjected to TPBG knockdown compared with the control cells (Fig. 4A). Collectively, the present results suggested that TPBG may affect cell migration and invasion through the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway. To further confirm these results, several molecules associated with the Wnt/PCP pathway were investigated. It was identified that the expression of Wnt5a, an extensively investigated Wnt ligand of the Wnt/PCP pathway (15,16) was inhibited (Fig. 4B). The activation of JNK, a downstream molecule of the Wnt/PCP pathway, was also reduced markedly (Fig. 4B). Thus, the present data indicated that TPBG may affect cell migration and invasion through the Wnt/PCP pathway.

Discussion

In the present study, the aberrant expression of TPBG in PDAC was described and the potential effect of highly expressed TPBG in PDAC cell lines was investigated. In previous studies, immunohistochemical analysis has revealed that TPBG is overexpressed in numerous types of cancer (5). In addition, the expression of TPBG usually indicates a poor prognosis, with TPBG expression correlating with the likelihood of cancer metastasis (79,17). Consistent with these observations, the present results provide evidence that TPBG may be a critical factor that facilitates PDAC progression and metastasis. In the present study, immunohistochemical analysis of a PDAC tissue microarray revealed that TPBG is closely associated with the TNM stage of the tumor. The cell migration and invasion abilities were significantly decreased following TPBG knockdown. TPBG expression is, therefore, correlated with the aggressiveness of PDAC, including the metastatic properties of the malignancy.

However, how TPBG regulates PDAC cell migration remains to be fully elucidated. The Wnt/PCP signaling pathway has been revealed to be involved in cell movement through the activation of the RhoA, JNK and nemo-like kinase signaling cascades (18). In addition, accumulating evidence has suggested that Wnt/PCP signaling is closely associated with tumors and has diverse roles in tumorigenesis (18,19). Previous studies have demonstrated that TPBG activates the Wnt/PCP pathways by modifying the subcellular localization of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 during Zebrafish development (20). These findings imply that TPBG may affect Wnt/PCP signaling in PDAC, thus the correlation between TPBG and Wnt/PCP signaling was further investigated.

It was identified that Wnt/PCP signaling was inhibited significantly in the PDAC cell lines following TPBG knockdown via a luciferase reporter assay. Numerous studies have suggested that Wnt5a, a typical noncanonical Wnt ligand, promotes the metastasis of melanoma, gastric cancer and breast cancer by activating the Rac and JNK signaling pathways (14,21,22). The expression of Wnt5a, Ror2 (a receptor for Wnt5a) (23) and a change in phospho-JNK were also detected and it was observed that the expression of Wnt5a and the activation of phospho-JNK were decreased markedly in the cell lines in which TPBG expression was silenced. Collectively, the present results demonstrated that TPBG promotes cancer metastasis partly through Wnt/PCP signaling. However, numerous factors remain to be elucidated, including how TPBG regulates the expression of Wnt5a and how TPBG affects the downstream molecules of the Wnt/PCP pathway.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that TPBG expression is upregulated in human PDAC tissues and the highly expressed TPBG may regulate the Wnt/PCP signaling to enhance the abilities of cancer cell migration and invasion. The findings of the present study indicate that the distinctive expression pattern of TPBG may render it a suitable target for the treatment of PDAC.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program; grant no. 2014AA020609) and the State Key Laboratory Project (grant no. 91-14-08, 91-14-14).

References

1 

Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH and Goggins M: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 378:607–620. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Helm JF, Centeno BA, Coppola D, et al: Outcomes following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 20-year experience at a single institution. Cancer Control. 15:288–294. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:11–30. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hole N and Stern PL: A 72 kD trophoblast glycoprotein defined by a monoclonal antibody. Br J Cancer. 57:239–246. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Southall PJ, Boxer GM, Bagshawe KD, Hole N, Bromley M and Stern PL: Immunohistological distribution of 5T4 antigen in normal and malignant tissues. Br J Cancer. 61:89–95. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Harrop R, Drury N, Shingler W, et al: Vaccination of colorectal cancer patients with modified vaccinia ankara encoding the tumor antigen 5T4 (TroVax) given alongside chemotherapy induces potent immune responses. Clin Cancer Res. 13:4487–4494. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Starzynska T, Marsh PJ, Schofield PF, Roberts SA, Myers KA and Stern PL: Prognostic significance of 5T4 oncofetal antigen expression in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 69:899–902. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wrigley E, McGown AT, Rennison J, et al: 5T4 oncofetal antigen expression in ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 5:269–274. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Naganuma H, Kono K, Mori Y, et al: Oncofetal antigen 5T4 expression as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 22:1033–1038. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Carsberg CJ, Myers KA and Stern PL: Metastasis-associated 5T4 antigen disrupts cell-cell contacts and induces cellular motility in epithelial cells. Int J Cancer. 68:84–92. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Awan A, Lucic MR, Shaw DM, et al: 5T4 interacts with TIP-2/GIPC, a PDZ protein, with implications for metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 290:1030–1036. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ma M-Z, Zhuang C, Yang X-M, et al: CTHRC1 acts as a prognostic factor and promotes invasiveness of gastrointestinal stromal tumors by activating Wnt/PCP-Rho signaling. Neoplasia. 16:265–278. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Li J, Yang X-M, Wang Y-H, et al: Monoamine oxidase a suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by inhibiting the adrenergic system and its transactivation of EGFR signaling. J Hepatol. 60:1225–1234. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Weeraratna AT, Jiang Y, Hostetter G, et al: Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Cancer Cell. 1:279–288. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Yamamoto H, Oue N, Sato A, et al: Wnt5a signaling is involved in the aggressiveness of prostate cancer and expression of metal-loproteinase. Oncogene. 29:2036–2046. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Vuga LJ, Ben-Yehudah A, Kovkarova-Naumovski E, et al: WNT5A is a regulator of fibroblast proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 41:583–589. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Castro FV, McGinn OJ, Krishnan S, et al: 5T4 oncofetal antigen is expressed in high risk of relapse childhood pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is associated with a more invasive and chemotactic phenotype. Leukemia. 26:1487–1498. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Katoh M: WNT/PCP signaling pathway and human cancer (review). Oncol Rep. 14:1583–1588. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Wang Y: Wnt/Planar cell polarity signaling: a new paradigm for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 8:2103–2109. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Kagermeier-Schenk B, Wehner D, Özhan-Kizil G, et al: Waif1/5T4 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling and activates noncanonical Wnt pathways by modifying LRP6 subcellular localization. Dev Cell. 21:1129–1143. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kurayoshi M, Oue N, Yamamoto H, et al: Expression of Wnt-5a is correlated with aggressiveness of gastric cancer by stimulating cell migration and invasion. Cancer Res. 66:10439–10448. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Pukrop T, Klemm F, Hagemann T, et al: Wnt 5a signaling is critical for macrophage-induced invasion of breast cancer cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:5454–5459. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Oishi I, Suzuki H, Onishi N, et al: The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway. Genes Cells. 8:645–654. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2015
Volume 12 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
He P, Jiang S, Ma M, Wang Y, Li R, Fang F, Tian G and Zhang Z: Trophoblast glycoprotein promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell metastasis through Wnt/planar cell polarity signaling. Mol Med Rep 12: 503-509, 2015
APA
He, P., Jiang, S., Ma, M., Wang, Y., Li, R., Fang, F. ... Zhang, Z. (2015). Trophoblast glycoprotein promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell metastasis through Wnt/planar cell polarity signaling. Molecular Medicine Reports, 12, 503-509. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3412
MLA
He, P., Jiang, S., Ma, M., Wang, Y., Li, R., Fang, F., Tian, G., Zhang, Z."Trophoblast glycoprotein promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell metastasis through Wnt/planar cell polarity signaling". Molecular Medicine Reports 12.1 (2015): 503-509.
Chicago
He, P., Jiang, S., Ma, M., Wang, Y., Li, R., Fang, F., Tian, G., Zhang, Z."Trophoblast glycoprotein promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell metastasis through Wnt/planar cell polarity signaling". Molecular Medicine Reports 12, no. 1 (2015): 503-509. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3412