Screening of targeted genes in extrahepatic bile ducts of mice with experimental biliary atresia

  • Authors:
    • Zhen You
    • Jing Wen
    • Liping Cheng
    • Hui Ye
    • Bei Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 9, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3903
  • Pages: 4326-4331
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Biliary atresia (BA) is an infantile disease resulting from a severe cholangiopathy, which can obstruct extrahepatic bile ducts, disrupt bile flow and lead to end‑stage cirrhosis. The current study aimed to develop a genetic method to investigate the pathogenesis of BA. The gene expression profile of BA (GSE46967) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and included 18 samples from newborn mice. These samples were collected at three time points following the induction of BA with rhesus rotavirus. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in mice with BA were identified using the limma package in R language, followed by hierarchical clustering analysis. Gene ontology functional analysis and Kyoto Enrichment of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of the selected common DEGs was conducted using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. In total, 306 DEGs were identified in the samples from the 3 day time point, 721 at 7 days and 370 at 14 days. A total of 74 common DEGs were identified in these three sample groups, which are reported to function in multiple immune biological processes, including the defense response, leukocyte migration, cell chemotaxis and leukocyte chemotaxis. In addition, ‘cytokine‑cytokine receptor interaction’ and ‘chemokine signaling pathway’ were observed to be significantly enriched in BA. A total of six common DEGs (CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL13, CXCR2, CCL5 and CCL6) were identified that were involved in the significantly enriched functions and the significantly enriched pathways. The data from the current study suggested that the immune response is a critical biological process in the development of BA. The six critical hub genes identified (CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL13, CXCR2, CCL5 and CCL6) may be used as specific target genes in the treatment of BA.

Introduction

Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare hepatobiliary disorder in infants with poor prognosis caused by an obstruction of the bile ducts, leading to a disruption in bile flow, which can rapidly progress to biliary cirrhosis (1,2). The incidence of BA in Asia is higher than in western countries, with reports indicating a rate of 1/9,600 to 1/16,700 of live births (3). BA is reported to occur in half of all cases of neonatal cholestasis with a greater incidence in females, and associated congenital malformations occur in 3–10% of cases of BA (4). Without treatment, BA progresses into liver cirrhosis, hepatic failure and mortality in <2 years following birth (5,6). Natural mortality of BA is 100%, therefore liver transplantation is a necessary requirement for late stage BA (7); however, current medical management of patients with BA is unsatisfactory, placing an economic burden on society and family members (5,7).

The etiology of BA remains to be fully elucidated; however, previous studies have identified three factors suggested to contribute to the formation of BA. One is congenital genetic abnormalities, for example, the mutation of INVS gene, which leads to abnormal functioning of inversin, and may terminate the development of biliary ducts during the embryonic period (8). Another factor identified by various studies is viral infection (9,10), with cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and human papilloma virus having all been isolated from the livers of infants with BA (1113). The third factor identified was immune disorders, which appeared following the viral infection (14). Previous studies have supported the hypothesis that the viral infection triggering host immune responses may be the basis for the pathogenesis of BA (15). Leonhardt et al (16) and Schreiber and Kleinman (17) additionally agreed that BA is a virus-induced, immune-mediated disease that occurs in genetically susceptible individuals. Previous studies have demonstrated that BA was associated with T helper cell response type I-mediated portal tract inflammation and that interleukin (IL)-2, interferon γ, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor α and macrophage activation all served important roles (18,19). The current study aimed to elucidate the pathogenesis of BA using biological information analysis in relation to immunology.

Microarray analysis has been reported as an effective method to monitor alterations in gene expression and identify genes that are associated with biological processes induced by BA. Leonhardt et al (16) identified several targeted genes that were implicated in the development of BA, including CCL2, CCL5, CCR5, CXCL9, CXCL10 and IL1F5 (20). The majority of these genes were associated with the immune system or with modulating inflammation.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression levels of cell signaling and transcription regulatory genes, such as CIT or ActRII were upregulated during BA progression (21), and BA was observed to be a necrotizing process caused by viral cholangitis at the embryonic stage and the expression level of the type II major histocompatibility complex was increased in the livers of patients (22). However, there is little evidence indicating the relevance between human leukocyte expression and BA. Thus, the cause and pathogenetic mechanism of BA remain largely unknown.

In the present study, microarray analysis was used to monitor differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in BA samples at different time points (3, 7 and 14 days) following induction with rhesus rotavirus (RRV) compared with sham-RRV-control. Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis was used, which combined gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Enrichment of Genes and Genome (KEGG) pathway information, in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the biological mechanisms of BA. The current study aimed to predict the hub genes that are most likely to be associated with BA, and to identify their molecular mechanisms in BA. This may aid in the development of novel therapeutic strategies for BA.

Materials and methods

Affymetrix microarray data

The microarray data were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, MD, USA) (23), which is the largest public database of its type. The gene expression profiles were extracted from the GEO database (ID: GSE46967) based on the GPL6246 Affymetrix Mouse Gene 1.0 ST array (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The experimental mice (18 tissue samples) were injected intraperitoneally with 1.5×106 units of rhesus rotavirus (RRV) or 0.9% normal saline (NS; control) within 24 h. The microarray data were collected from the experimental group and the control group at 3, 7 and 14 days after RRV or saline injection. Each experimental condition contained three sets of samples (three treated with RRV three with normal saline).

A total of 28,816 probes were mapped with the gene names labelled in the GPL6246 annotation platform, and a log2 transformation was performed on 25,299 genes (24). The limma package (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limma) in R language was used to select the DEGs of the case-group compared with the control-group (25). The P-values were adjusted by the Benjamin and Hochberg method, and the FDR-value based on the multtest package of 0.05 was used as the cut-off criterion (26).

Hiarchical clustering of DEGs

The expression values of DEGs in each group were selected according to the probe information from the downloaded file. The R language pheatmap package (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html) was used for hierarchical clustering analysis (27) of DEGs based on Euclidean distance (28), and the results were presented in heat maps. Genes with similar expression levels could be collected together by hierarchical clustering for a convenient search. Samples clustered based on the gene expression value can aid in determining whether the screening DEGs have sample specificity or not, which means the selected sample types (case or control) can be identified based on the differential gene expression information.

Common DEGs of three time points

The expression levels of selected genes from samples at 3, 7 and 14 days were compared, in order to identify the common DEGs (29).

GO analysis and pathway enrichment analysis

GO analysis has become a commonly used approach for functional studies of large-scale genomic or transcription data (30). The KEGG pathway database contains information of how molecules or genes are networked, which is complementary to the majority of the existing molecular biology databases containing the information of individual genes (31). The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) bioinformatics resources consist of an integrated biological knowledge base and analytical tools aimed at systematically extracting biological meaning from large gene or protein lists (32). DAVID was used to analyze the enriched functions and pathways of the common DEGs at the three time points with P<0.05.

In addition, the expression values of DEGs that participated in the most significant GO functions and KEGG pathways were compared.

Results

Screening and hierarchical clustering analysis

In order to investigate DEGs in mice with BA at 3, 7 and 14 days following viral induction, the publicly available microarray dataset GSE46967 from GEO was used. A total of 306 DEGs were selected in the 3 day samples, 721 DEGs in the 7 day samples and 370 DEGs in the 14 day samples (Fig. 1). From the heat maps (Fig. 2), the results of hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that the case- and control-groups can be separated by the selected DEGs in each group, which means the expression patterns of DEGs screened were significant, and they can be used to distinguish case and control samples. A total of 74 common DEGs were identified between the samples from the different time points (Fig. 3A), and the expression values of all of these common DEGs were upregulated, as compared with in the control samples(Fig. 3B).

Functional annotation analysis of common DEGs

To investigate the alterations in the function of selected common DEGs, DAVID was used to identify the significant GO categories in the biological process. A total of 12 GO terms were observed to be enriched among the 74 DEGs (Table I), of which several significantly enriched functions were associated with immune function, including the defense response, leukocyte migration, cell chemotaxis and leukocyte chemotaxis. C3AR1, CCL3, C5AR1, CXCL5, FPR1, CXCR2, CCL5, ITGAM, CCL6, CXCL13, CSF3R, IL1B and FCER1G were the genes enriched in the significant functions.

Table I

Function enrichment analysis of the common DEGs.

Table I

Function enrichment analysis of the common DEGs.

TermCountFDR
GO:0042330~taxis13 1.67×10−13
GO:0006935~chemotaxis14 1.67×10−13
GO:0006955~immune response21 1.67×10−13
GO:0007626~locomotory behavior14 4.38×10−09
GO:0006952~defense response17 5.54×10−09
GO:0007610~behavior14 3.07×10−06
GO:0030595~leukocyte chemotaxis6 6.90×10−05
GO:0060326~cell chemotaxis6 6.90×10−05
GO:0006954~inflammatory response10 1.98×10−04
GO:0030593~neutrophil chemotaxis5 6.03×10−04
GO:0009611~response to wounding11 7.79×10−04
GO:0050900~leukocyte migration6 7.86×10−04

[i] DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, gene ontology; FDR, false discovery rate.

Pathway analysis of common DEGs

To further understand the pathways of the DEGs screened in the current study, DAVID was used to identify the significant pathways. Two pathways (Table II), were identified to be enriched, the 'cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction' and 'chemokine signaling pathway'. The 'cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction' pathway was the most significant pathway with ten genes involved, as follows: IL1R2, CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL13, CCR1, IL1B, CSF3R, CXCR2, CCL5 and CCL6.

Table II

Pathways involved with common DEGs.

Table II

Pathways involved with common DEGs.

Kyoto enrichment of genes and genomesGene numberFDR
mmu04060: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction100.003256
mmu04062: Chemokine signaling pathway90.003469

[i] DEGs, differentially expressed genes; FDR, false discovery rate.

Expression values of DEGs participating in significant functions and pathways

A total of 13 DEGs were identified to be associated with the significant functions, and 10 DEGs with the significant pathways. Following the comparison of the two types of DEGs, the following 6 common DEGs were identified: CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL13, CXCR2, CCL5 and CCL6. The expression profile of these 6 DEGs in each of the three samples were analyzed (Fig. 4A). It is observed in the figure that all 6 of the DEGs in the three sample types were significantly overexpressed, and CXCL13 was identified to have a consistent overexpression from the 3rd day to the 14th day. CCL3, CCL5 and CCL6; however, demonstrated the highest overexpression on the 7th day, but were decreased on the 14th day. CXCL5 and CXCR2 presented the highest overexpression on the 3rd day (Fig. 4B).

Discussion

BA is an infantile disorder in which there is obliteration or discontinuity of the extrahepatic biliary tree. If left untreated, it progresses to cirrhosis, liver failure and eventually to mortality, and the current treatment strategies are unsatisfactory (2,5). Previous studies using histological sections of extrahepatic biliary tract tissue from patients, in addition to experimental studies using the BA mice model, have demonstrated that an inflammatory process appears to contribute to the pathogenesis of BA (18,33). Previous studies that further identify the relevant inflammatory cascade revealed an upregulation in pro-inflammatory cytokines (20). A total of 306 DEGs were identified in the 3 day samples, 721 in the 7 day samples and 370 in the 14 day samples in mice with BA following injection with rhesus rotavirus. In total, 74 common DEGs were selected from the three sample types at different time points, which function predominantly in the immune biological process, including the defense response, leukocyte migration, cell chemotaxis and leukocyte chemotaxis. The 'cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction' and 'chemokine signaling pathway' were identified as the most significantly enriched pathways. A total of six significantly overexpressed genes (CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL13, CXCR2, CCL5 and CCL6) associated with the immune response and cytokine pathways at the three time points were screened, which were investigated in the significant functions and pathways.

Chemokines are small proteins that are vital in immune and inflammatory reactions. Induction of leukocyte migration is the predominant function of the chemokines, which additionally affect angiogenesis, collagen production and the proliferation of hematopoietic precursors (34). CCL3 (MIP-1α) is a chemokine produced by activated T-cells, basophilic granulocytes and type 2 T helper cells (35). The chemokine CCL3 has several functions, including serving a role in cell lysis mediated by natural killer cells, participating in the inflammatory response associated with immunological processes, and mediating the release of the other cytokines (36). Seki et al (37) reported that MIP-1α had the ability to gather the hepatic stellate and inflammatory cells migrating to the site of injury, so as to function on the liver fibration. Zerfaoui et al (38) demonstrated that CCL3 was able to activate T cells thus producing CCL5 (RANTES). CCL3 and CCL5 have the ability to assemble and to activate eosinophilic granulocytes to release histamine and leukotrienes so as to induce inflammatory cell adherence to the vessel wall (38). Increased levels of CCL5 have been observed in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, and the therapeutic benefits of fibrates in this biliary disease may be due to the inhibition of this CCL5, with its resultant effects on inflammatory cell migration (39). From the results of the present study, it is suggested that the expression of CCL3 and CCL5 are elevated in a time-dependent manner until 7 days, indicating that these two molecules are critical for the pathogenesis of BA in mice. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that the two cytokines are associated with the migration and infiltration of monocytes, memory T lymphocytes and natural killer cells (4042), so it was speculated that they may be involved in the early recruitment of different subsets of leukocytes in the formation of BA.

The CXCR2 gene was first cloned by Murphy and Tiffany (43) and the chemokine CXCR2, which is produced on the surface of neutrophils and natural killer cells, is also a member of the G-protein superfamily. A previous study demonstrated that CXCR2 may combine with the chemokine CXCL5 in order to activate the downstream effector molecules, and may subsequently mediate signal transduction and cell migration via the allosteric G-protein (44). CXCL5 is a small-molecule type secretory protein, which has a direct chemotaxis for neutrophils and is able to mediate the infiltration of neutrophils, thus promoting the metastasis of liver cancer cells (45). Li et al (46) reported that CXCL5 contributed to the formation of tumor vessels by activating certain signaling pathways, such as the protein kinase B, signal transduction and activating transcription factor pathways (47). In the present study, the variation tendency of the CXCL5 expression level was similar with that of CXCR2 and their expression peaked at 3 days. This phenomenon may indicate that the chemokine receptor CXCR2 and CXCL5 may combine, in order to affect inflammation in mice with BA by collecting leukocytes.

CXCL13 is a chemokine produced by B-cells and is critical for targets seeking B-cell and B-cell zone formation in lymphatic tissue (48). A previous study indicated that modulation of the inflammatory signaling cascade, particularly cytokine secretion, may attenuate the severity of BA in the murine model. Shivakumar et al demonstrated that RRV-infected, interferon γ-deficient Bulb/c mice had a lower mortality rate than wild type animals (48). Anesl et al (49) demonstrated that the natural antibody production in mice deficient in CXCL13 was markedly reduced, and no response was triggered to a bacterial antigen by intraperitoneal injection in this case. In addition, the roles of CXCL13 have been observed in other immune system-associated diseases. Hjelmstrom et al (50) observed that CXCL13 was overexpressed in transgenic mice suffering from chronic inflammation induced by lymphotoxin-α (50). Based on the data from the current study, the expression levels of CXCL13 were increased until 14 days in mice with BA. Elevated levels of CXCL13 is not unique to active BA, but it may serve as a marker of disease activity or response to treatment in combination with other diagnostic markers.

Notably, low expression levels of CCL6 were observed in BA-positive mice. It was hypothesized that the chemokine CCL6 may serve an important function in the progression of BA, however further study is required in order to further elucidate the mechanisms.

In conclusion, CCL3, CCL5, CXCL5, CXCR2, CXCL13 and CCL6, are suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of BA, but serve different roles. The current study provided a basis for future experiments with the potential use of RRV-injected mice, which may enhance understanding of the pathogenesis of BA and lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

References

1 

Mack CL, Feldman AG and Sokol RJ: Clues to the etiology of bile duct injury in biliary atresia. Semin Liver Dis. 32:307–316. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Petersen C: Pathogenesis and treatment opportunities for biliary atresia. Clin Liver Dis. 10:73–88. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Jimenez-Rivera C, Jolin-Dahel KS, Fortinsky KJ, Gozdyra P and Benchimol EI: International incidence and outcomes of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 56:344–354. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Davenport M, Ong E, Sharif K, et al: Biliary atresia in England and Wales: results of centralization and new benchmark. J Pediatr Surg. 46:1689–1694. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Mendoza MM, Chiang JH, Lee SY, et al: Reappraise the effect of redo-Kasai for recurrent jaundice following Kasai operation for biliary atresia in the era of liver transplantation. Pediatr Surg Int. 28:861–864. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bijl EJ, Bharwani KD, Houwen RH and de Man RA: The long-term outcome of the Kasai operation in patients with biliary atresia: a systematic review. Neth J Med. 71:170–173. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Cronin DC, Squires J, Squires R, Mazariegos G and Lantos JD: Parental refusal of a liver transplant for a child with biliary atresia. Pediatrics. 131:141–146. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Shimadera S, Iwai N, Deguchi E, Kimura O, Fumino S and Yokoyama T: The inv mouse as an experimental model of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 42:1555–1560. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Mack CL, Falta MT, Sullivan AK, et al: Oligoclonal expansions of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in the target organ of patients with biliary atresia. Gastroenterology. 133:278–287. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

de Carvalho E, Ivantes CA and Bezerra JA: Extrahepatic biliary atresia: current concepts and future directions. J Pediatr (Rio J). 83:105–120. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Soomro GB, Abbas Z, Hassan M, Luck N, Memon Y and Khan AW: Is there any association of extra hepatic biliary atresia with cytomegalovirus or other infections. J Pak Med Assoc. 61:281–283. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Mahjoub F, Shahsiah R, Ardalan FA, et al: Detection of Epstein Barr virus by chromogenic in situ hybridization in cases of extra-hepatic biliary atresia. Diagn Pathol. 3:192008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Schaffer K, Hassan J, Staines A, et al: Surveillance of Epstein-Barr virus loads in adult liver transplantation: associations with age, sex, posttransplant times, and transplant indications. Liver Transpl. 17:1420–1426. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Whitington PF, Malladi P, Melin-Aldana H, Azzam R, Mack CL and Sahai A: Expression of osteopontin correlates with portal biliary proliferation and fibrosis in biliary atresia. Pediatr Res. 57:837–844. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Mack CL: The pathogenesis of biliary atresia: evidence for a virus-induced autoimmune disease. Semin Liver Dis. 27:233–242. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Leonhardt J, Stanulla M, Von Wasielewski R, et al: Gene expression profile of the infective murine model for biliary atresia. Pediatr Surg Int. 22:84–89. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Schreiber RA and Kleinman RE: Biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 35(Suppl 1): S11–S16. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Mack CL, Tucker RM, Sokol RJ, et al: Biliary atresia is associated with CD4+ Th1 cell-mediated portal tract inflammation. Pediatr Res. 56:79–87. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Lages CS, Simmons J, Chougnet CA and Miethke AG: Regulatory T cells control the CD8 adaptive immune response at the time of ductal obstruction in experimental biliary atresia. Hepatology. 56:219–227. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Bezerra JA, Tiao G, Ryckman FC, et al: Genetic induction of proinflammatory immunity in children with biliary atresia. Lancet. 360:1653–1659. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Nakamura K and Tanoue A: Etiology of biliary atresia as a developmental anomaly: recent advances. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 20:459–464. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Hirschfield GM, Liu X, Xu C, et al: Primary biliary cirrhosis associated with HLA, IL12A, and IL12RB2 variants. N Engl J Med. 360:2544–2555. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Barrett T, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, et al: NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles - database and tools update. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D760–D765. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Fujita A, Sato JR, Rodrigues Lde O, Ferreira CE and Sogayar MC: Evaluating different methods of microarray data normalization. BMC bioinformatics. 7:4692006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, et al: Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc. 8:1765–1786. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Benjamini Y and Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 57:289–300. 1995.

27 

Langfelder P and Horvath S: Fast R functions for robust correlations and hierarchical clustering. J Stat Softw. 46:112012.

28 

Mukherjee S, Chen Z and Gangopadhyay A: A privacy-preserving technique for Euclidean distance-based mining algorithms using Fourier-related transforms. VLDB J. 15:293–315. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Pirooznia M, Nagarajan V and Deng Y: GeneVenn - A web application for comparing gene lists using Venn diagrams. Bioinformation. 1:420–422. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hulsegge I, Kommadath A and Smits MA: Globaltest and GOEAST: two different approaches for Gene Ontology analysis. BMC Proc. 3(Suppl 4): S102009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kanehisa M and Goto S: KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:27–30. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Huang da W, Sherman BT and Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 4:44–57. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Mack CL, Tucker RM, Sokol RJ and Kotzin BL: Armed CD4+ Th1 effector cells and activated macrophages participate in bile duct injury in murine biliary atresia. Clin Immunol. 115:200–209. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Carmeliet P: Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med. 9:653–660. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Ramos CDL, Canetti C, Souto JT, et al: MIP-alpha[CCL3] acting on the CCR1 receptor mediates neutrophil migration in immune inflammation via sequential release of TNF-alpha and LTB4. J Leukoc Biol. 78:167–177. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ekman AK, Fransson M, Rydberg C, Adner M and Cardell LO: Nasal challenge with LPS stimulates the release of macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 149:154–160. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Seki E, De Minicis S, Gwak GY, et al: CCR1 and CCR5 promote hepatic fibrosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 119:1858–1870. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Zerfaoui M, Naura AS, Errami Y, et al: Effects of PARP-1 deficiency on airway inflammatory cell recruitment in response to LPS or TNF: differential effects on CXCR2 ligands and Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines. J Leukoc Biol. 86:1385–1392. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Hirano Y, Hirano F, Fujii H and Makino I: Fibrates suppress chenodeoxycholic acid-induced RANTES expression through inhibition of NF-kappaB activation. Eur J Pharmacol. 448:19–26. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Yamamoto S, Shimizu S, Kiyonaka S, et al: TRPM2-mediated Ca2+ influx induces chemokine production in monocytes that aggravates inflammatory neutrophil infiltration. Nat Med. 14:738–747. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Schlecker E, Stojanovic A, Eisen C, et al: Tumor-infiltrating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells mediate CCR5-dependent recruitment of regulatory T cells favoring tumor growth. J Immunol. 189:5602–5611. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Robertson MJ: Role of chemokines in the biology of natural killer cells. J Leukoc Biol. 71:173–183. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

43 

Murphy PM and Tiffany HL: Cloning of complementary DNA encoding a functional human interleukin-8 receptor. Science. 253:1280–1283. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Stillie R, Farooq SM, Gordon JR and Stadnyk AW: The functional significance behind expressing two IL-8 receptor types on PMN. J Leukoc Biol. 86:529–543. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Okabe H, Beppu T, Ueda M, et al: Identification of CXCL5/ENA-78 as a factor involved in the interaction between cholangiocarcinoma cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Int J Cancer. 131:2234–2241. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Li A, King J, Moro A, et al: Overexpression of CXCL5 is associated with poor survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Am J Pathol. 178:1340–1349. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

van de Pavert SA, Olivier BJ, Goverse G, et al: Chemokine CXCL13 is essential for lymph node initiation and is induced by retinoic acid and neuronal stimulation. Nat Immunol. 10:1193–1199. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Shivakumar P, Campbell KM, Sabla GE, et al: Obstruction of extrahepatic bile ducts by lymphocytes is regulated by IFN-γ in experimental biliary atresia. J Clin Invest. 114:322–329. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Ansel KM, Harris RB and Cyster JG: CXCL13 is required for B1 cell homing, natural antibody production, and body cavity immunity. Immunity. 16:67–76. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Hjelmström P, Fjell J, Nakagawa T, Sacca R, Cuff CA and Ruddle NH: Lymphoid tissue homing chemokines are expressed in chronic inflammation. Am J Pathol. 156:1133–1138. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2015
Volume 12 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
You Z, Wen J, Cheng L, Ye H and Li B: Screening of targeted genes in extrahepatic bile ducts of mice with experimental biliary atresia. Mol Med Rep 12: 4326-4331, 2015
APA
You, Z., Wen, J., Cheng, L., Ye, H., & Li, B. (2015). Screening of targeted genes in extrahepatic bile ducts of mice with experimental biliary atresia. Molecular Medicine Reports, 12, 4326-4331. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3903
MLA
You, Z., Wen, J., Cheng, L., Ye, H., Li, B."Screening of targeted genes in extrahepatic bile ducts of mice with experimental biliary atresia". Molecular Medicine Reports 12.3 (2015): 4326-4331.
Chicago
You, Z., Wen, J., Cheng, L., Ye, H., Li, B."Screening of targeted genes in extrahepatic bile ducts of mice with experimental biliary atresia". Molecular Medicine Reports 12, no. 3 (2015): 4326-4331. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3903