Anti‑inflammatory drugs and uterine cervical cancer cells: Antineoplastic effect of meclofenamic acid

  • Authors:
    • Alejandro D. Soriano‑Hernandez
    • Daniela Madrigal‑Pérez
    • Hector R. Galvan‑Salazar
    • Margarita L. Martinez‑Fierro
    • Laura L. Valdez‑Velazquez
    • Francisco Espinoza‑Gómez
    • Oscar F. Vazquez‑Vuelvas
    • Bertha A. Olmedo‑Buenrostro
    • Jose Guzman‑Esquivel
    • Iram P. Rodriguez‑Sanchez
    • Agustin Lara‑Esqueda
    • Daniel A. Montes‑Galindo
    • Ivan Delgado‑Enciso
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 7, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3580
  • Pages: 2574-2578
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Uterine cervical cancer (UCC) is one of the main causes of cancer‑associated mortality in women. Inflammation has been identified as an important component of this neoplasia; in this context, anti‑inflammatory drugs represent possible prophylactic and/or therapeutic alternatives that require further investigation. Anti‑inflammatory drugs are common and each one may exhibit a different antineoplastic effect. As a result, the present study investigated different anti‑inflammatory models of UCC in vitro and in vivo. Celecoxib, sulindac, nimesulide, dexamethasone, meclofenamic acid, flufenamic acid and mefenamic acid were tested in UCC HeLa, VIPA, INBL and SiHa cell lines. The cytotoxicity of the drugs was evaluated in vitro. Celecoxib, sulindac, nimesulide, mefenamic acid and flufenamic acid presented with slight to moderate toxicity (10‑40% of cell death corresponding to 100 µM) in certain cell lines, while meclofenamic acid exhibited significant cytotoxicity in all essayed cell lines (50‑90% of cell death corresponding to 100 µM). The meclofenamic acid was tested in murine models (immunodeficient and immunocompetent) of UCC, which manifested a significant reduction in tumor growth and increased mouse survival. It was demonstrated that of the evaluated anti‑inflammatory drugs, meclofenamic acid was the most cytotoxic, with a significant antitumor effect in murine models. Subsequent studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical utility of this drug.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2015
Volume 10 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Soriano‑Hernandez AD, Madrigal‑Pérez D, Galvan‑Salazar HR, Martinez‑Fierro ML, Valdez‑Velazquez LL, Espinoza‑Gómez F, Vazquez‑Vuelvas OF, Olmedo‑Buenrostro BA, Guzman‑Esquivel J, Rodriguez‑Sanchez IP, Rodriguez‑Sanchez IP, et al: Anti‑inflammatory drugs and uterine cervical cancer cells: Antineoplastic effect of meclofenamic acid. Oncol Lett 10: 2574-2578, 2015
APA
Soriano‑Hernandez, A.D., Madrigal‑Pérez, D., Galvan‑Salazar, H.R., Martinez‑Fierro, M.L., Valdez‑Velazquez, L.L., Espinoza‑Gómez, F. ... Delgado‑Enciso, I. (2015). Anti‑inflammatory drugs and uterine cervical cancer cells: Antineoplastic effect of meclofenamic acid. Oncology Letters, 10, 2574-2578. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3580
MLA
Soriano‑Hernandez, A. D., Madrigal‑Pérez, D., Galvan‑Salazar, H. R., Martinez‑Fierro, M. L., Valdez‑Velazquez, L. L., Espinoza‑Gómez, F., Vazquez‑Vuelvas, O. F., Olmedo‑Buenrostro, B. A., Guzman‑Esquivel, J., Rodriguez‑Sanchez, I. P., Lara‑Esqueda, A., Montes‑Galindo, D. A., Delgado‑Enciso, I."Anti‑inflammatory drugs and uterine cervical cancer cells: Antineoplastic effect of meclofenamic acid". Oncology Letters 10.4 (2015): 2574-2578.
Chicago
Soriano‑Hernandez, A. D., Madrigal‑Pérez, D., Galvan‑Salazar, H. R., Martinez‑Fierro, M. L., Valdez‑Velazquez, L. L., Espinoza‑Gómez, F., Vazquez‑Vuelvas, O. F., Olmedo‑Buenrostro, B. A., Guzman‑Esquivel, J., Rodriguez‑Sanchez, I. P., Lara‑Esqueda, A., Montes‑Galindo, D. A., Delgado‑Enciso, I."Anti‑inflammatory drugs and uterine cervical cancer cells: Antineoplastic effect of meclofenamic acid". Oncology Letters 10, no. 4 (2015): 2574-2578. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3580