or
www.spandidos-publications.com
Home  | About  | Contact
Spandidos Logo
Advanced Search
Login  | Register

congress_banner

main_table_top_image
   Current Issue Forthcoming Archive Manuscript Submission About Editor and Editorial Board Sitemap
Lactoferrin immunoexpression in endometrial carcinomas: relationships with sex steroid hormone receptors (ER and PR), proliferation indices (Ki-67 and AgNOR) and survival

Authors:
Giuseppe Giuffrè, Francesco Arena, Rosa Scarfì, Angela Simone, Paolo Todaro, Giovanni Tuccari

Affiliations:
Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico G. Martino’, I-98125 Messina, Italy

Pages:
257-263

Abstract:

We have investigated Lf immunoexpression as well as its biological meaning in 71 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgical samples of endometrial carcinomas (EC); 64 EC were endometrioid type, whereas 7 were non-endometrioid carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry was performed by primary antibodies against Lactoferrin (Lf), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki-67 antigen. Quantification of Lf immunoreactivity was performed using an intensity-distribution (ID) score. Moreover, the AgNOR technique according to guidelines of the Committee on AgNOR Quantification was used to assess the proliferation rate (NORA). A variable expression of Lf was revealed in 43 cases (61%) of EC. Endometrioid type carcinoma showed a significant higher Lf ID-score than non-endometrioid type; in contrast, no relationships were demonstrated between Lf immunoexpression and histologic grade, stage, clinical course as well as proliferative activity of EC. Moreover, a significantly higher Lf ID-score was encountered in ER-positive carcinomas. Survival analysis in EC indicated the architectural, nuclear and combined histologic grades as well as the stage, PR, Ki-67 and NORA as significant parameters. The utilization of Lf as a prognostic marker, able to identify patients at different risk of death, or alternatively, its clinical application as therapeutic agent, must be considered with great caution.

Oncology Reports

August 2006
Volume 16 Number 2


Viewing options: Share this article:



main_table_bottom_image