Prognostic value of cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and circulating tumor cells in lung cancer
- G. Pirozzi
- V. Tirino
- R. Camerlingo
- A. La Rocca
- N. Martucci
- G. Scognamiglio
- R. Franco
- M. Cantile
- N. Normanno
- G. Rocco
- Corresponding author:
- G. Pirozzi [ email@example.com ]
Published online on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
- Pages: 1763-1768 DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2294
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death in the world at present (1). Currently, the survival of lung cancer patients is poor with only 15% of patients surviving 5 years follosing diagnosis. Although new chemotherapy agents and radiotherapy have improved the survival and quality of life of patients, the overall effect in the last decade has been mainly on palliation rather than reduction in mortality. Two important hypotheses have been postulated to explain the genesis, formation, growth and metastasis of epithelial cancer: the role of cancer stem cells (CSCs) or tumor-initiating cells (TICs) and the involvement of ‘so called’ epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The CSC hypothesis asserts that only a small subset of cells within a tumor has the ability of both tumor initiation and sustaining tumor growth (2,3). These cells, that express stemness markers, are capable of forming floating spheres in serum-free medium, a property associated with stem cells and are able to differentiate into an aberrant cell phenotype constituting tumor heterogeneity (4). There are two basic concepts that support the hypothesis that CSCs originate from normal tissue stem cells. First of all, CSCs have normal stem cell features such as self-renewal, differentiation, drug resistance and migration capacity. Moreover, the longevity of stem cells makes them susceptible to accumulating genetic and epigenetic damages so as to make them a suitable candidate for the emergence of neoplastic transformation. CSCs are the only cells that are capable of generating tumors similar to the original patient specimens when transplanted into immunocompromised mice such as NOD/SCID mice. Finally, CSCs have been identified in a variety of solid tumors including glioblastomas (5), breast (6) and lung cancer (7,8).
During tumorigenesis, subsets of tumor cells localized within the primary tumor may acquire features of invasiveness and motility and enter blood or lymph vessels. Mechanisms involved in this process are still under investigation; however, they have been reported to be linked to variable interactions between tumor cells and their surrounding stroma, including response to hypoxia and metalloproteinase-dependent invasion into surrounding tissue, (neo-)vascularization of the tumor (9), as well as gain of a phenotype revealing signatures of EMT observed in at least a subpopulation of tumor cells with certain ‘stemness’ properties (10). EMT is a key program in embryonic development, often activated during cancer invasion and metastasis and by which cells undergo a morphological switch from the epithelial polarized phenotype to the mesenchymal fibroblastoid phenotype. As a result of EMT, epithelial cells lose their defined cell-cell/cell-substratum contacts and their structural/functional polarity, and they become spindle-shaped and morphologically similar to activated fibroblasts (11) by downregulation of epithelial differentiation markers including cytokeratins and E-cadherin and transcriptional induction of mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, fibronectin and N-cadherin. CTCs can infiltrate and survive in and colonize to distant organs (12). Recent advances in this field are supportive for the early dissemination model of metastasis, through the observation that disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) isolated from bone marrow or lymph nodes display disparate changes on all levels of genomic resolution as compared to primary tumor cells (13). Cancer cell dissemination may be followed by a dormancy period before relapse in one or more organs (14). Current research on DTCs and CTCs presents a challenge, as these cells are well-defined targets for understanding tumor biology and tumor cell dissemination in cancer patients (15), and may open new avenues for the early detection of metastatic spread and its successful treatment.
The aim of the present study was to correlate EMT markers, CTCs and CSCs with clinicopathological parameters and follow-up of patients with NSCLC to verify whether these markers contribute to accurate stratification of patients at risk for recurrent and metastatic disease.
Materials and methods
Patients and follow-up
Forty-five consecutive patients undergoing resection for primary NSCLC were enrolled. As previously described (16), in all cases, preoperative staging was performed in order to exclude patients with advanced disease. Generally, lung resection consisted of lobectomy or pneumonectomy with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Immediately after surgical resection, tumor-draining pulmonary vein stumps were punctured to obtain blood samples. Follow-up studies included physical examination, chest X-ray, and blood tests at a 3-month interval and an additional thoracic chest and abdomen (CT) scan, along with flexible bronchoscopy at a 6-month interval. Thus, relapses and deaths were recorded in our files. Ethics committee approval was provided in all instances (IRB approval no. 556).
Patient characteristics are documented in Table I. There were 14 female patients. The median age at the time of surgery was 74.2 years (range, 48–81). The median follow-up duration was 16.3 months (range, 1–26). Pathological stage I was recorded in 32 patients, stage II in 8 patients and stage III in 5 patients. Relapses were recorded in 11 cases, with a mean time of 14 months. At the end of the follow-up, death was observed in 6 cases, 32 patients were alive without disease and 7 patients were alive with disease.
Histology of primary tumors
All cases were reviewed according to WHO classification. In particular, pathological stage, histological type and when applicable cancer grade were determined.
Isolation of cancer cells from NSCLC biopsies and flow cytometry
Fresh NSCLC biopsies were minced with scissors, filtered through 40-mm nylon meshes and subsequently analyzed for EMT and CSC markers using flow cytometry. At least 200,000 cells were incubated with 1 μg/μl of fluorescent-labelled monoclonal antibodies or respective isotype controls at 4°C for 30 min in the dark. After incubation, the samples were washed and analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACSAria II (Becton-Dickinson, USA). The antibodies used were: CD133/2 PE (Miltenyi Biotec S.r.l., Calderara di Reno, Bologna, Italy), CSC marker CD326 PE (EpCAM, Miltenyi Biotec), CD90 FITC (BD Pharmingen, Buccinasco, Milan, Italy), mesenchymal marker CD45 CY (BD Pharmingen) and leukocyte marker. All data were analyzed using DIVA 6.6 software.
Isolation of mononuclear cells from pulmonary venous blood and CTC identification
The tumor-draining pulmonary vein was punctured subsequent to thoracotomy and prior to intrathoracal preparation for lung resection. Pulmonary venous blood (10 ml) was drawn into a sterile syringe. The obtained pulmonary venous blood, yielding between 5×106 and 6×107 (mean, 2.5×107) mononuclear cells, was centrifuged through 20 ml Ficoll-Hypaque for 30 min at 1,200 rpm. The interface layer, which contains mononuclear cells, was collected and brought to a final concentration of 106 cells/ml. The obtained cells were fixed with Cytolit™ solution and then processed according to the ThinPrep2000™ method (Cytyc Corp., Marlborough, MA).
Occult tumor cells of pulmonary venous blood were detected by immunohistochemical staining using pan-cytokeratins. Antigen retrieval was performed on all slides obtained by the ThinPrep2000 method. The first step of antigen retrieval lasted for 30 min at ~100°C with a citrate-based buffer (Leica Bond Epitope retrieval solution, pH 5.9–6.1). CK 8/18/19 (pan-CK) mouse monoclonal antibody (clone A45-B/B3, 1:100 dilution; Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Gladbach, Germany) was applied and incubation was carried out for 60 min, followed by a washing step to remove any excess antibody. The antibody was visualized using the peroxidase detection system (RE7120-K; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) and diaminobenzidine (DAB) as contrasting chromogen.
As previously described, a tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed using the most representative areas from each single case (16) using a semiautomated tissue arrayer (Galileo TMA CK 3500).
Primary antibodies included anti-human CD133 (AC133, dilution 1.150; Miltenyi Biotec), c-kit (polyclonal, diluition 1:500; Dako) and CD90 (EPR3132, dilution 1:150; Lifespan). Antigen retrieval was performed by microwave pretreatment in 0.01 M citrate buffer for 10 min. Sections were incubated with mouse anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary immunoglobulin (IgG) biotiny-lated secondary antibody for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized by means of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex kit reagents (Novocastra) as the chromogenic substrate. Finally, sections were weakly counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted. Appropriate inner cells were considered as controls. For each antibody, cytoplasmic and membranous staining was recorded. Tissues were scored semi-quantitatively by evaluating the proportion of positive tumor cells over the total number of tumor cells (percentage of positive tumor cells per tissue microarray punch). Negative, low expression and high expression cases were recorded when neoplastic cells expressing chemokine receptor were between 0 and 10%, <30% and >30%, respectively.
Total RNA was isolated from frozen biopsies from our Institutional Bio-Bank, using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were treated with RNase-free DNase (Qiagen GmbH) to prevent amplification of genomic DNA. A total of 1 μg RNA was subjected to cDNA synthesis for 1 h at 37°C using the Ready-To-Go You-Primer First-Strand Beads kit (code 27-9264-01; Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) in a reaction mixture containing 0.5 μg random hexamers (GeneAmp RNA PCR random hexamers set N808-0127; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a LightCycler system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) using TaqMan® analysis. In this system, all reactions were run in glass capillaries with LightCycler TaqMan Master Mix (code 04735536001; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 10 μl in a volume of 20 μl containing 2 μl of cDNA and 1 μl of specific TaqMan Gene Expression Assays for human CD133 (Real-Time Designer Assay code 05583055001; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), according to the manufacturer's instructions. All reactions were performed in triplicate. The thermal cycling conditions included a step of 20 sec at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 1 sec and 60°C for 20 sec. The comparative Ct method was employed to determine the human CD133 gene variation, using as reference gene TaqMan Endogenous Controls Human ACTB (β-actin) (Real-Time Designer Assay code 05532957001; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). We identified a calibrator cell line that represents the unitary amount of the target of interest. Consequently, the samples express n-fold mRNA relative to the calibrator. Final amounts of target were determined as follows: Target amount = 2 − Ct, where Ct = [Ct (CD133) − Ct (ACTB)]sample − [Ct (CD133) − Ct (ACTB)]calibrator.
The primary outcome variables were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences among groups were analyzed using the log-rank test. OS was calculated as the time from the date of surgical resection to death of any cause or until the date of the last follow-up at which point data were censored. DFS was defined as the time between surgical resection until signs of disease progression (PD), death (DCD) from any cause and last radiological assessment. Data on survivors were censored at the last follow-up. We used non-parametric tests to compare independent groups of numerical data (Mann-Whitney test) and categorical data (χ2-test and Fisher's exact test). The correlations among numerical variables were assessed by Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Multivariate analyses, with backward variable selection, were conducted using the Cox's proportional-hazard regression model. Variables at the 0.10 level in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. The level of significance was defined as P<0.05. All the statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Science 8.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Cytokeratin expression in CTCs in tumor-draining venous blood and TMA analyses
Cells positive for cytokeratins were detectable in 11 (23.9%) cases from tumor-draining pulmonary venous blood and were distributed as showed in Table I. The number of cells positive for cytokeratins ranged from 2 to 10 (Fig. 1).
Immunohistochemical analyses for cytokeratins. (A) CTCs positive for pan-cytokeratins (original magnification, ×400). (B) Detailed image of CTCs positive for pan-cytokeratins (original magnification, ×630).
Flow cytometric analysis and prognosis
Fresh surgical biopsies of NSCLC obtained from 45 patients undergoing tumor resection were mechanically disaggregated, and the resulting single-cell suspensions were analyzed by flow cytometry to identify both the cell population expressing the stemness marker CD133, and the cell population expressing EMT markers CD90 (mesenchymal marker) and CD326 (epithelial marker). The co-expression of CD90 and CD326 identifies the EMT subpopulation. The co-expression of CD90/CD326 markers was detectable in 42 of the 45 (93.3%) samples with a mean percentage of 10.41% (range, 0–55.2%) (Fig. 2). The expression of the CD133 marker was detectable in 40 of the 45 (88.8%) samples with a mean percentage of 1.6% (range, 0–9.22%).
Cytometric analyses of fresh biopsy samples demonstrating expression of CD133 marker and co-expression of CD90/CD326 markers in 2 samples tested.
TMA evaluation and RT-PCR
Prognostic TMA analyses showed a heterogeneous expression of c-kit as detected by immunohistochemistry. In particular, 12 of the 45 cases were positive. CD133 was observed as positive focal membrane expression in neoplastic cells (Fig. 3), and CD133 mRNA was overexpression as detected by qRT-PCR, in all cases documented as positive in cytofluorimetry.
TMA analyses showing (A) high expression of c-kit (original magnification, ×200), (B and C) low expression of c-kit (original magnification, ×200) and (D) focal expression of CD133 (original magnification, ×400).
Using cytometry, the CD133 antigen showed a high statistically significant correlation with deceased patients when compared with CD90/CD326 co-expression (32.5 vs. 9.5%, P=0.01). Additionally, CD133 expression exhibited a strong correlation, although not statistically significant, with patients with progression disease when compared to CD90/CD326 co-expression (15 vs. 7.1%, P=0.21) (Table II). A statistically significantly inverse correlation (P=0.04) was also noted between CD133 expression and that of c-kit. Moreover, no statistically significant relationship existed between the presence of CTCs and CD133 expression.
CD133 expression was significantly related to shorter DFS (P=0.001) (Fig. 4). A non-significant relationship was noted between OS and all of the analyzed markers.
Survival curve showing that patients with tumors positive for CD133 had poorer prognoses than patients with tumors negative for CD133.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Generally, the overall survival of lung cancer patients is low, due to late presentation, frequent tumor relapse and lack of effective systemic therapy. Recently, the CSC theory proposes that cancer maintenance is guaranteed by tumor cells that possess stem or progenitor cell features. Thus, CSCs are able to initiate tumor formation and differentiate along multi-potent pathways. In addition, they are relatively resistant to conventional chemotherapy (17). Various stem cell markers of normal tissues have been proposed to detect CSCs. In particular, the CD133 antigen appears to be the most frequently demonstrated marker in liver, brain, colon and lung cancers (5,7,18,19). Thus, recent studies using NSCLC cell lines and fresh lung tumor tissues suggest CD133 as a lung CSC marker (7,8,20,21–23). A biochemical study showed that CD133 plays a functional role in cell cycle regulation and proliferation but not in tumor initiation (24). Yet, numerous other markers have been identified in lung cancer CSCs, with conflicting results. Thus, the marker profile of lung CSCs remains to be explored. Studies performed on lung cancer cell lines by flow cytometry demonstrated no significant CD133 expression by either semi-quantitative RT-PCR, IHC, immunoblotting or flow cytometry analysis. For example, only 0.7% of cells with CD133 expression was noted in H1299 cells, while no expression was found in our study (20,25). Our data confirmed the relative low percentage of cells positive for CD133 as identified by flow cytofluorimetry in fresh lung cancer tissues.
The relationship between CD133 expression and patient prognosis has been documented in many tumor types. Thus, CD133 expression is related to poor prognosis in cancer of the colorectum (26–29), brain (30), liver (31), stomach (32), endometrium (33), ovary (34) and lung (35). The majority of these studies are small in sample size and are further limited by use of the immunohistochemistry method, which results generally in high background noise with the commercial antibody. Several of the studies utilized CD133 mRNA alone or in combination with other markers. In our study, we evaluated CD133 expression using three different methods, with substantial superimposable results. In fact, cases with CD133 expression by flow cytometry were confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis on paraffin-embedded tumor tissue and by real-time PCR. Although a small series was studied, the use of different methods reinforced the finding that CD133 expression is a significant predictor of lung cancer prognosis.
Other markers have been proposed as CSC biomarkers in lung cancer. Among these, c-kit receptors and embryonic markers have been suggested (36).
In particular, c-kit has been considered a stemness biomarker in many tumor histotypes, with conflicting results in term of prognosis in small and non-small cell lung cancer. In our series we observed no relationship between c-kit expression and patient prognosis, and a significantly inverse relation was noted between c-kit-expressing and CD133-expressing cases. The significance of stemness in cancer varies from one tumor to another, and research aimed to determine an accurate profile of CSCs for each tumor type appears to be the next frontier to elucidate the role of this biological feature in the clinical setting for each patient. In fact, in our series, CD133 was a strong predictor and c-kit was not. Moreover, using immunohistochemistry, these two markers did not identify the same neoplastic cells, probably due to the fact that c-kit expression in this context was not related to stemness properties but to other biological events, such as gene mutations that are described in other tumors.
It is well known that DTCs can be found in the circulation of patients with metastatic cancer, and it has been hypothesized that these DTCs may represent cancer stem cells or a cell population with high metastatic potential (37). In recent years, significant effort has been made to develop technologies that achieve specific and sensitive detection and capture of CTCs. In a recent study (16), we identified in the same set of patients CTCs by immunohistochemistry in pulmonary vein blood obtained after the surgical intervention. No association was found between the presence of CTCs and patient prognosis. Herein, we found that no statistical relationship exists between the presence of CTCs and CD133 expression. This is probably due to the fact that all CTCs have stemness properties, responsible for circulation and colonization to distant organs and recirculation, i.e. to propagate tumor progression. In fact, the majority of CTCs will either die in the bloodstream due to mechanical shear forces, immune surveillance, and/or other regulatory mechanisms; a few cells will successfully extravasate and form new colonies at distant sites. Based on this view, only CSCs are able to survive the difficulties of metastatic development. For this reason, clinical reports evaluating CTCs have provided contradictory results with various studies indicating that CTC detection may be associated with poor prognosis (38,39) whereas others have failed to show such an association (40).
In this context, it is important to consider the role of EMT in metastases. In the present study, we evaluated cells undergoing EMT using CD90 and CD326 markers from cells derived from fresh biopsy samples. CD90 is a main mesenchymal marker, while CD326 is an epithelial marker expressed both in normal and pathological epithelial tissues. Their co-expression indicates cells expressing both epithelial and mesenchymal markers; hence, cells undergoing EMT. Our results demonstrated that this cell subset existed, but in respect to CD133 expression, it was not correlated with patient prognosis. In conclusion, our data reinforce the role of CD133 expression in primary tumors in terms of prognosis, although a complete profile of CSCs in lung cancer is needed for correct patient stratification. In addition, the lack of association between the presence of CTCs and CD133 suggests that numerous factors are responsible, but only stemness favors tumor growth in distant sites and cancer maintenance.
The authors would like to thank Dr Alessandra Trocino, librarian of the National Cancer Institute, Naples, for providing excellent bibliographic services and assistance. This study was financially supported by the Italian Government. This study was presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, February, 2012.