Activation of the phosphorylation of ATM contributes to radioresistance of glioma stem cells

Zhou,Wei; Sun,Mao; Li,Guang-Hui; Wu,Yong-Zhong; Wang,Ying; Jin,Fu; Zhang,Yun-Yun; Yang,Li; Wang,Dong-Lin

doi:10.3892/or.2013.2614

Activation of the phosphorylation of ATM contributes to radioresistance of glioma stem cells

Authors:
- Wei Zhou
- Mao Sun
- Guang-Hui Li
- Yong-Zhong Wu
- Ying Wang
- Fu Jin
- Yun-Yun Zhang
- Li Yang
- Dong-Lin Wang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing 400030, P.R. China, Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P.R. China, Department of Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research of the People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China, Department of Radiotherapy, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing 400030, P.R. China, School of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, P.R. China, Department of Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing 400030, P.R. China
Published online on: July 11, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2614
Pages: 1793-1801

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (IR) is currently the most efficient therapy available for malignant glioma. Unfortunately, this strategy is palliative due to the characteristics of radioresistance of malignant glioma. The aim of our study was to compare glioma stem cells (GSCs) with glioma cells (GCs) to determine whether GSCs are responsible for the radioresistance phenotype and to elucidate whether cell cycle checkpoint proteins are responsible for the radioresistance of GSCs. In this study, CD133 (a marker of brain cancer stem cells) and nestin were co-expressed in GSCs isolated from GCs. The percent of CD133+ cells in GSCs and GCs were >80 and <2%, respectively. Significantly more GSCs survived following 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy IR than GCs. IR kills cancer cells primarily through DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The neutral comet assay is often used to intuitively show the level of DSBs. Significantly fewer GSCs showed DNA damage than GCs following 2 Gy IR. This demonstrated that GSCs are more resistant to in vitro radiation than GCs. Furthermore, activated ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is essential for the activation of downstream effector kinases, such as checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) and p53 which mainly contribute to the proper regulation of IR-induced arrest in the G1 phase. DNA damage induced by IR potently initiated activation of phosphorylation of the ATM, p53 and Chk2 checkpoint proteins. Activation of the phosphorylation of these checkpoint proteins was significantly higher in the GSCs compared to GCs. We found that inhibition of ATM activation induced cell cycle checkpoint defects and increased the rate of apoptosis of GSCs following IR. Our results suggest that GSCs were more resistant to radiation compared to GCs due to high expression of phosphorylated cell cycle checkpoint proteins, and inhibition of ATM could significantly reduce the radioresistance of GSCs and GCs. ATM may represent a source of radioresistance in GSCs and a target of improved radiosensitivity of GSCs.

View Figures

View References

1	Grossman SA and Batara JF: Current management of glioblastoma multiforme. Semin Oncol. 31:635–644. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Nieder C, Andratschke N, Wiedenmann N, Busch R, Grosu AL and Molls M: Radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Does altered fractionation improve the outcome? Strahlenther Onkol. 180:401–407. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF and Weissman IL: Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 414:105–111. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Marx J: Cancer research. Mutant stem cells may seed cancer. Science. 301:1308–1310. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Clarke MF, Dick JE, Dirks PB, Eaves CJ, Jamieson CH, Jones DL, Visvader J, Weissman IL and Wahl GM: Cancer stem cells - perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 66:9339–9344. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
6	Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD and Rich JN: Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 444:756–760. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	McCord AM, Jamal M, Williams ES, Camphausen K and Tofilon PJ: CD133⁺ glioblastoma stem-like cells are radiosensitive with a defective DNA damage response compared with established cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 15:5145–5153. 2009.
8	Tichý A, Vávrová J, Pejchal J and Rezácová M: Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) as a central regulator of radiation-induced DNA damage response. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 53:13–17. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
9	Bower JJ, Zhou Y, Zhou T, Simpson DA, Arlander SJ, Paules RS, Cordeiro-Stone M and Kaufmann WK: Revised genetic requirements for the decatenation G2 checkpoint: the role of ATM. Cell Cycle. 9:1617–1628. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Banin S, Moyal L, Shieh S, Taya Y, Anderson CW, Chessa L, Smorodinsky NI, Prives C, Reiss Y, Shiloh Y and Ziv Y: Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage. Science. 281:1674–1677. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Matsuoka S, Huang M and Elledge SJ: Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science. 282:1893–1897. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Jiang H, Reinhardt HC, Bartkova J, Tommiska J, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H, Bartek J, Yaffe MB and Hemann MT: The combined status of ATM and p53 link tumor development with therapeutic response. Genes Dev. 23:1895–1909. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Ignatova TN, Kukekov VG, Laywell ED, Suslov ON, Vrionis FD and Steindler DA: Human cortical glial tumors contain neural stem-like cells expressing astroglial and neuronal markers in vitro. Glia. 39:193–206. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J and Dirks PB: Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 63:5821–5828. 2003.PubMed/NCBI
15	Kondo T, Setoguchi T and Taga T: Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:781–786. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Li G, Chen Z, Hu YD, Wei H, Li D, Ji H and Wang DL: Autocrine factors sustain glioblastoma stem cell self-renewal. Oncol Rep. 21:419–424. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
17	Li GH, Wei H, Lv SQ, Ji H and Wang DL: Knockdown of STAT3 expression by RNAi suppresses growth and induces apoptosis and differentiation in glioblastoma stem cells. Int J Oncol. 37:103–110. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
18	Blazek ER, Foutch JL and Maki G: Daoy medulloblastoma cells that express CD133 are radioresistant relative to CD133⁻ cells, and the CD133⁺ sector is enlarged by hypoxia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 67:1–5. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Diehn M and Clarke MF: Cancer stem cells and radiotherapy: new insights into tumor radioresistance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 98:1755–1757. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR and Schneider EL: A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 175:184–191. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar
21	Ng WL, Yan D, Zhang X, Mo YY and Wang Y: Over-expression of miR-100 is responsible for the low-expression of ATM in the human glioma cell line: M059J. DNA Repair. 9:1170–1175. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Allalunis-Turner MJ, Barron GM, Day RS III, Dobler KD and Mirzayans R: Isolation of two cell lines from a human malignant glioma specimen differing in sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs. Radiat Res. 134:349–354. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Choi S, Gamper AM, White JS and Bakkenist CJ: Inhibition of ATM kinase activity does not phenocopy ATM protein disruption: implications for the clinical utility of ATM kinase inhibitors. Cell Cycle. 9:4052–4057. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Kennedy RD and D’Andrea AD: DNA repair pathways in clinical practice: lessons from pediatric cancer susceptibility syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 24:3799–3808. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Shiloh Y: ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:155–168. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Canman CE, Wolff AC, Chen CY, Fornace AJ Jr and Kastan MB: The p53-dependent G1 cell cycle checkpoint pathway and ataxia-telangiectasia. Cancer Res. 54:5054–5058. 1994.PubMed/NCBI
27	Rainey MD, Charlton ME, Stanton RV and Kastan MB: Transient inhibition of ATM kinase is sufficient to enhance cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 68:7466–7474. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	White JS, Choi S and Bakkenist CJ: Transient ATM kinase inhibition disrupts DNA damage-induced sister chromatid exchange. Sci Signal. 3:ra442010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Kastan MB, Onyekwere O, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B and Craig RW: Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 51:6304–6311. 1991.PubMed/NCBI