
Factors related to morbidity and mortality of meningiomas resection‑associated venous thromboembolism (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 19, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2666
- Article Number: 70
-
Copyright: © Georgakopoulou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
1. Introduction
Meningiomas account for the second most frequent primary central nervous system tumor in adults (1). Despite considerable progress in current therapies, microsurgical resection is considered the treatment of choice for a number of patients with meningiomas (2-6).
Patients undergoing intracranial meningioma removal have been reported to have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), when compared with other intracranial tumors (7-9).
The published data on patients with postoperative VTE after meningiomas resection range from 3-72% (7,9,10-12). The precise mechanism for this result is unknown, but some hypotheses have included the following: Brain thromboplastin proliferation during surgical intervention, incited coagulation of the meningeal surface, steroid therapy and a quantity of tumor-released hormonal and inflammatory factors (1). Consequently, given the clinical effects of postoperative VTE in this patient population, reducing the occurrence of VTE would considerably improve mortality. In addition, new pre- and postoperative management procedures that contain chemical prophylaxis, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), have poorer effects on VTE compared with patients who do not receive LMWH (13,14).
However, the benefit of anticoagulants is debatable, and they are linked to a higher likelihood of intracranial hemorrhage, making it even more crucial to identify which patients with meningioma have the greatest risk of postoperative VTE in order to improve decision-making concerning the risk-benefit ratio of assertive prophylactic measures (15,16).
The present study performed a meta-analysis for meningioma operations to ascertain rates of postoperative VTE more closely and to ascertain the associated parameters with VTE-related morbidity and mortality in meningioma patients following resection.
2. Sources and data extraction
Search strategy
The present study searched the comparative articles involving meningiomas surgery and postoperative VTE (thromboembolic complications: DVT and PE) through electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, Medline (January 1980-January 2021), PubMed (January 1980-January 2021) and EMBASE (January 1980-January 2021). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) were applied for establishing protocol and manuscript design (17). The present study used the keywords ‘meningioma’, ‘thrombosis’, and ‘risk of thrombosis’ in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) list.
Selection of studies
Two of the reviewers (GF and VEG) independently extracted data from the included articles, following the guidelines of the epidemiology of meta-analysis. The information captured included the following essentials: The main authors, year of publication, total case number in the meningiomas surgery (control) and postoperative VET groups, study type and outcome indicator. The extracted data was entered into a designed, standardized table according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions (v5.1.0) (18). Fig. 1 depicts a flow chart of the study selection process. If there was disagreement, another of the authors had the final say.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Studies were included in the meta-analysis if the article met the following criteria, as determined by PICOS: i) Population: Limited to patients with intracranial meningiomas and postoperative VTE; ii) intervention: Use of surgical treatment for intracranial meningiomas; iii) comparison: Compared the outcomes and iv) outcome measures: One of the primary outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality, was involved. Tables I and II contain detailed data on these studies. To avoid publication bias, the final aim was to collect a homogenous pool of studies, including articles that compare only two modalities: Intracranial meningioma surgery and postoperative VTE.
The present study included all prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated at least one of the two modalities. Excluded were editorials, reviews, case reports, articles focusing on the pediatric population, unrelated outcomes, co-morbidities, experimental techniques, or one of the two modalities from the article pool. In addition, all that had mixed or unclear results were put into either the meningioma surgery group (the control group) or the VTE group.
Definition of outcomes
The primary outcomes involved in the present study included VTE-related mortality and morbidity. In addition, to find out the association between meningioma surgery and VTE, outcome measurements such as surgical duration, body mass index (BMI), location and the proliferation marker for human tumor cells, Ki-67 were collected. The outcomes reported by the included articles were assessed at least 30 days after the surgical treatment of meningiomas.
Patient morbidity was scored Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) <80(19); dependent ambulatory (indicating walking with a mobility aid, such as a cane or walking frame), wheel-chair bound, or bedridden. VTE-related mortality was defined as mortality within 30 days following surgery registered with VTE.
The mean surgical duration, defined as the time from anesthesia induction to skin closure, was >310 min. A board-certified neuroradiologist's pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging review described the mean tumor size (mean volume in cm3) and location (supratentorial, infratentorial and skull base). Tumor grade and Ki-67 indices were retrieved from operative pathology reports based on the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (III) assigned by board-certified neuropathologists (20).
Additionally, to decrease the risk of bias in poor articles, a quality assessment tool [the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS)] was used (Table II) (21).
Evaluation of the risk of bias
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool to assess the risk of bias (ROB) was used by two reviewers (GF and VEG) for each study (22). The evaluation includes random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and assessors, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting and other biases. The assessment results were classified into three levels: Low risk, high risk and unclear risk. A third reviewer arbitrated any disagreements.
Data synthesis and assessment of heterogeneity
All analyses were carried out using Review Manager Software (RevMan), version 5.4 (https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software/revman). Heterogeneity across trials was identified using I2 statistics; I2>50% was considered as high heterogeneity. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0) (19). When the model parameters were fixed or non-random quantities the fixed-effect model was used. The continuous outcomes were expressed as a weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For discontinuous variables, odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs were applied for the assessment. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
3. Data on parameters associated with VTE-related morbidity and mortality in meningioma patients following resection
Eligibility criteria were met by five articles (1,9,23-25). The total number of patients was 6,505 who underwent surgery for meningiomas and 299 (4.5%) revealed postoperative VTE. The study sample was based on five studies (Table II). All reports were retrospective observational studies.
Epidemiological and clinical features
The mean age of patients was 56.9 (60.1 years for the VTE sample) and ranged from 18-77 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1:3.07 (1:1.24 for the VTE group). A total of 1,277 (21.1%) of 6,038/6,505 patients with morbidity data had a KPS of 80 and 191 (63.8%) of 287/299 VTE patients had a poor outcome.
Surgical duration
Information on surgical duration was available in four of the five articles (1,9,23,25) with a total of 1,469 patients and 129 with VTE presented with a mean surgical time of 380/429 min for total patients and VTE demonstrated a statistically significant result (OR 0.35, CI 95% 0.14-0.56 and P<0.05) with no heterogeneity (P=0.57 and I2=0%). A very low publication bias was found (Fig. 2).
BMI
Information regarding BMI was available in five articles (1,9,23-25) with a total of 6,505 patients and 299 with VTE presented with a mean BMI of 27.9/29.1 (kg/m2) for total patients and VTE demonstrated statistically significant results (OR 2.48, CI 95% 1.58-3.38 and P<0.05) with no heterogeneity (P=0.32 and I2=0%) with no heterogeneity (P=0.32 and I2=0%). A very low publication bias was found (Fig. 3).
Location
Information regarding location was available in three of five articles (1,9,25).
Supratentorial
Supratentorial location was reported in 390 (38.9%) of the 1,002 patients in the total sample and in 81 (69.2%) of the 117 patients in the VTE group. The results of the analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference (OR 2.13, CI 95% 0.98-4.63 and P=0.06) with heterogeneity (P=0.02 and I2=75%; (Fig. S1).
Infratentorial
As regards the infratentorial location, the total number of patients was 124 (12.3%) from 1,002 in the total sample and 15 (12.8%) from 1,117 in the VTE group. The statistical analysis demonstrated no potentially significant difference [OR 0.83, CI 95% (0.47-1.48), P=0.54], providing no heterogeneity (P=0.91 and I2=0%) (Fig. S2). A very low publication bias was found.
Skull base
In total, 259 (24.8%) of 1,002 patients had skull base location and 18 (15.3%) of 117 had VTE. The results of the analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference (OR 0.58, CI 95% 0.23-1.46 and P=0.25), with low heterogeneity (P=0.23 and I2=33%; Fig. S3).
Ki-67 is a proliferation marker for human tumor cells. Ki-67 <2%
Information regarding Ki-67 <2% was available in four of five articles (1,9,23,25) and demonstrated no statistical significance (OR 0.98, CI 95% 0.72-1.31 and P=0.87) with no heterogeneity (P=0.76 and I2=0%; Fig. S4). Ki-67 <2% was found in 1,053 of 1,469 (71.6%) patients in the total group, compared with the VTE group, where Ki-67 <2% was diagnosed in 89 of 129 (68.9%) patients.
Ki-67 2-10%
There were 282 (19.1%) of the 1,469 patients with Ki-67 (2-10%) and 31 (24.0%) of the 129 patients with VTE in the total group of patients. The results of the analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference (OR 1.30, CI 95% 0.84-2.01 and P=0.24), with no heterogeneity (P=0.45 and I2=0%; Fig. S5).
Ki-67 >10%
As regards the Ki-67 >10%, the total number of patients was 93 (6.3%) from 1,469 patients and 9 (6.9%) from 129 in the VTE group. The statistical analysis demonstrated no potentially significant difference (OR 1.37, CI 95% (0.43-2.80), P=0.38), providing no heterogeneity (P=0.86 and I2=0%; Fig. S6). A very low publication bias was found.
Morbidity
Morbidity data were available in four of the five articles (1,23-25) with a total of 1,277 (21.1%) patients; poor KPS in 191 (66.5%) of 287 VTE patients, a statistically significant difference (OR 2.58, CI 95% 1.11-5.99 and P=0.03) and heterogeneity (P=0.05 and I2=92%; Fig. 4). Testing the sensitivity, the present study used the ‘leave out one’ model and removed one study at a time (Table III). After removing the article by Safaee et al (23), a statistically significant difference result was found (OR 4.19, CI 95% 3.30-5.31 and P<0.05), with no heterogeneity (P=0.37 and I2=0%; Fig. 4B). It was found that the study results without the Safaee et al (23) displayed superior dispersion, with very low publication bias.
Mortality
As regards the mortality rate, information was available in four of the five articles (1,9,23,25). In the total group of patients, there were 129 (8.7%) from 1,469 patients diagnosed and 12 (17.9%) from 67 in the VTE group. The pooled results demonstrated a statistically significant result (OR 29.12, CI 95% 7.89-107.38 and P<0.05) with no heterogeneity (P=0.92 and I2=0%; Fig. 5).
4. Discussion
The present study suggested that open surgery for meningiomas was associated with postoperative VTE in 4.5% of patients. More precisely, a mean surgical duration time >380 min and a mean BMI >27.9 kg/m2 were statistically significant VTE-related parameters in patients who underwent meningiomas surgery, showing an association with VTE-related morbidity and mortality. The findings of the present meta-analysis study suggested that surgical duration and BMI are related to a high risk of VTE and, thus, an increased risk of postoperative morbidity (KPS <80) and mortality.
The 4.5% postoperative VTE rate taken out of these data is certainly lower than rates accounted for in other studies, which have reported up to 72% of patients with meningiomas developing VTE (26). However, this approximation relies on how VTE is defined. Thus, the literature on symptomatic postoperative VTE mentions a much lower percentage, with rates between 3.09 and 7.2% (9,11), which fits the results of the present study.
A number of the risk factors identified in the present study have been previously reported (24). A mean surgical duration has not been correlated with patients with meningioma but is a known risk factor for VTE (27,28). A mean surgical duration of more than 310 min, defined as the time from anesthesia induction to skin closure, appears to be associated with poor outcome and a high risk of mortality and morbidity in patients with postoperative VTE after meningiomas resection in the present study.
In addition, obesity, defined by BMI, has not been correlated with patients with meningioma but is known as another risk factor for VTE (10). The present study included BMI as one of the main parameters associated with postoperative meningiomas and VTE-related morbidity and mortality.
Although a number of risk factors have been found significant for the development of VTE, such as larger tumor size and skull base location (8,29), the present study found no statistically significant results. Additionally, the Ki-67 proliferation marker for human tumor cells does not relate to VTE-related mortality and morbidity in patients who underwent surgical resection for meningiomas.
In the present study, the mortality rate of patients with postoperative VTE was found to be 17.9%, which is almost double the 5.88% derived from the literature (9,24). This inconsistency may be due to measuring the mortality rate in the different postoperative periods.
Study limitations
There are several limitations to the present study. First, all eligible reports that were included were retrospective. These retrospective studies, by definition, rely on imprecision and can suffer from data loss. Additionally, the methods of the included studies differed significantly. Among these differences were the operative technique (e.g., anterior/lateral approach) and length of follow-up (e.g., 30-90 days). Finally, limitations of the other studies were the small sample size and that there was not among the included studies in the current paper a clearly separated information about receiving LMWH. Thus the identification of VTE risk in patients receiving LMWH compared with those not receiving LMWH or other VTE prophylaxis measures could be indicate the aim of a possible future study.
5. Conclusions
The present study investigated the clinical outcomes of patients who had postoperative VTE following intracranial meningioma resection. The findings demonstrated that open surgery for meningiomas was associated with postoperative VTE. Furthermore, surgical duration and BMI were statistically significant VTE-related parameters in patients who underwent meningioma surgery, showing an association with VTE-related morbidity and mortality. The findings of the present meta-analysis study highlighted that surgical duration and BMI are related to a high risk of VTE and, thus, an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Supplementary Material
Supratentorial location. (A) OR forest plot supratentorial location: Results demonstrated no statistically significant results (OR 2.13, CI 95% 0.98-4.63 and P=0.06). (B) Funnel plot of the supratentorial location in the group of patients with surgical management of intracranial meningiomas, demonstrated very high heterogeneity (P=0.02 and I2=75%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value; I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; SE, standard error.
Infratentorial location. (A) OR forest plot infratentorial location: Results demonstrated no statistically significant results [OR 0.83, CI 95% (0.47-1.48), P=0.54]. (B) Funnel plot of the infratentorial location in the group of patients with surgical management of intracranial meningiomas, providing no heterogeneity (P=0.91 and I2=0%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value; I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; SE, standard error.
Skull base location. (A) OR Forest plot skull base location: Results demonstrated no statistically significant results (OR 0.58, CI 95% 0.23-1.46 and P=0.25). (B) Funnel plot of the skull base location in the group of patients with surgical management of intracranial meningiomas, providing low heterogeneity (P=0.23 and I2=33%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value; I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; SE, standard error.
Ki-67 <2%. (A) OR Forest plot Ki-67 <2%: Results demonstrated no statistically significant results (OR 0.98, CI 95% 0.72-1.31 and P=0.87); (B) Funnel plot of the Ki-67 <2% in the group of patients with surgical management of intracranial meningiomas, providing no heterogeneity (P=0.76 and I2=0%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value; I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; SE, standard error.
Ki-67 2-10%. (A) Forest plot Ki-67 2-10%: Results demonstrated no statistically significant result (OR 1.30, CI 95% 0.84-2.01 and P=0.24). (B) Funnel plot, testing the sensitivity with funnel plot for Ki-67 2-10% there was no heterogeneity and thus low publication bias (P=0.45 and I2=0%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value; I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; SE, standard error.
Ki-67 >10%. (A) Forest plot Ki-67 >10%: Results demonstrated no statistically significant result [OR 1.37, CI 95% (0.43-2.80), P=0.38]. (B) Funnel plot, testing the sensitivity with funnel plot for Ki-67 >10% there was no heterogeneity and thus low publication bias (P=0.86 and I2=0%). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P, P-value; I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; SE, standard error.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Authors' contributions
GF and VEG conceived the study. VEG, AAF, KT, PS, DAS, GF and NT analyzed the data and wrote and prepared the draft of the manuscript. VEG and GF provided critical revisions. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
DAS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. The other authors have no competing interests.
References
Gerber DE, Segal JB, Salhotra A, Olivi A, Grossman SA and Streiff MB: Venous thromboembolism occurs infrequently in meningioma patients receiving combined modality prophylaxis. Cancer. 109:300–305. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fotakopoulos G, Tsianaka E, Panagiotopoulos V and Fountas K: New Developments in Management of Meningioma. J Integr Oncol. 4(1000135)2015. | |
Fotakopoulos G, Tsolaki V, Aravantinou-Fatorou A, Georgakopoulou VE, Spandidos DA, Papalexis P, Tarantinos K, Trakas N, Sklapani P, Mathioudakis N, et al: Uncommon and atypical meningiomas and imaging variants: A report of 7 cases. Med Int (Lond). 2(35)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Alexiou GA, Vartholomatos E, Goussia A, Dova L, Karamoutsios A, Fotakopoulos G, Kyritsis AP and Voulgaris S: DNA content is associated with malignancy of intracranial neoplasms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115:1784–1787. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Black PM, Morokoff AP and Zauberman J: Surgery for extra-axial tumors of the cerebral convexity and midline. Neurosurgery. 62 (6 Suppl 3):S1115–S1123. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ekşi MŞ, Canbolat Ç, Akbaş A, Özmen BB, Akpınar E, Usseli Mİ, Güngör A, Güdük M, Hacıhanefioğlu M, Erşen Danyeli A, et al: Elderly patients with intracranial meningioma: surgical considerations in 228 patients with a comprehensive analysis of the literature. World Neurosurg. 132:e350–e365. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Carrabba G, Riva M, Conte V, Di Cristofori A, Caroli M, Locatelli M, Castellani M, Bucciarelli P, Artoni A, Stocchetti N, et al: Risk of post-operative venous thromboembolism in patients with meningioma. J Neurooncol. 138:401–406. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eisenring CV, Neidert MC, Sabanés Bové D, Held L, Sarnthein J and Krayenbühl N: Reduction of thromboembolic events in meningioma surgery: A cohort study of 724 consecutive patients. PLoS One. 8(e79170)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hoefnagel D, Kwee LE, van Putten EH, Kros JM, Dirven CM and Dammers R: The incidence of postoperative thromboembolic complications following surgical resection of intracranial meningioma. A retrospective study of a large single center patient cohort. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 123:150–154. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Karhade AV, Fandino L, Gupta S, Cote DJ, Iorgulescu JB, Broekman ML, Aglio LS, Dunn IF and Smith TR: Impact of operative length on post-operative complications in meningioma surgery: A NSQIP analysis. J Neurooncol. 131:59–67. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Levi AD, Wallace MC, Bernstein M and Walters BC: Venous thromboembolism after brain tumor surgery: A retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 28:859–863. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sawaya R and Glas-Greenwalt P: Postoperative venous thromboembolism and brain tumors: Part II. Hemostatic profile. J Neurooncol. 14:127–134. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Iorio A and Agnelli G: Low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgery: A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 160:2327–2332. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Khan NR, Patel PG, Sharpe JP, Lee SL and Sorenson J: Chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 129:906–915. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hart RG, Boop BS and Anderson DC: Oral anticoagulants and intracranial hemorrhage. Facts and hypotheses. Stroke. 26:1471–1477. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Flaherty ML: Anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Semin Neurol. 30:565–572. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Foster RL: Reporting guidelines: Consort, prisma, and squire. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 17:1–2. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Higgins JPT and Green S (eds): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Updated March 2011. | |
Schag CC, Heinrich RL and Ganz PA: Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2:187–193. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW and Kleihues P: The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 114:97–109. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M and Tugwell P: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institut, Ottawa, ON, 2014. http://www.ohri.ca/ programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. | |
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, et al: The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 343(d5928)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Safaee M, Sun MZ, Oh T, Aghi MK, Berger MS, McDermott MW, Parsa AT and Bloch O: Use of thrombin-based hemostatic matrix during meningioma resection: A potential risk factor for perioperative thromboembolic events. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 119:116–120. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nunno A, Li Y, Pieters TA, Towner JE, Schmidt T, Shi M, Walter K and Li YM: Risk factors and associated complications of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with craniotomy for meningioma. World Neurosurg. 122:e1505–e1510. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fluss R, Kobets AJ, Inocencio JF, Hamad M, Feigen C, Altschul DJ and Lasala P: The incidence of venous thromboembolism following surgical resection of intracranial and intraspinal meningioma. A systematic review and retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 201(106460)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sawaya R, Zuccarello M, Elkalliny M and Nishiyama H: Postoperative venous thromboembolism and brain tumors: Part I. Clinical profile. J Neurooncol. 14:119–125. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kim JY, Khavanin N, Rambachan A, McCarthy RJ, Mlodinow AS, De Oliveria GS Jr, Stock MC, Gust MJ and Mahvi DM: Surgical duration and risk of venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg. 150:110–117. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Anderson FA Jr and Spencer FA: Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 107 (23 Suppl 1):I9–I16. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Moussa WMM and Mohamed MAA: Prophylactic use of anticoagulation and hemodilution for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events following meningioma surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 144:1–6. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |