Open Access

Effectiveness and safety of immune response to SARS‑CoV‑2 vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease and dialysis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

  • Authors:
    • Kejia Li
    • Yang Xia
    • Hua Ye
    • Xian Sun
    • Bairu Shi
    • Jiajun Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 19, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1766
  • Article Number: 78
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) vaccination is the most effective way to prevent COVID‑19. However, for chronic kidney disease patients on long‑term dialysis, there is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the immune response to the vaccine. The present meta‑analysis explores the efficacy and safety of COVID‑19 vaccine in the immune response of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Data analysis was performed using REVMAN 5.1s and Stata14 software. Baseline data and endpoint events were extracted, mainly including age, sex, dialysis vintage, body mass index (BMI), vaccine type and dose, history of COVID‑19 infection, seropositivity rate, antibody titer, pain at injection site, headache and other safety events. The meta‑analysis included 33 trials involving 81,348 patients. The immune efficacy of patients with CKD and dialysis was 80% (95 CI, 73‑87%). The seropositivity rate of individuals without COVID‑19 infection was 76.48% (3,824/5,000), while the seropositivity rate of individuals with COVID‑19 infection was 80.82% (1,858/2,299). The standard mean difference of antibody titers in CKD and dialysis patients with or without COVID‑19 infection was 27.73 (95% CI, ‑19.58‑75.04). A total of nine studies reported the most common adverse events: Pain at the injection site, accounting for 18% (95 CI, 6‑29%), followed by fatigue and headache, accounting for 8 (95 CI, 4‑13%) and 6% (95 CI, 2‑9%), respectively. COVID‑19 vaccine benefitted patients with CKD undergoing dialysis with seropositivity rate ≥80%. Adverse events such as fatigue, headache, and pain at the injection site may occur after COVID‑19 vaccination but the incidence is low. 

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused social, economic, and political chaos worldwide (1). The effectiveness of antibody treatments varies depending on the variation of the virus strain (2). The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified α, β, γ, δ and ο as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus variants of concern (3). These variants notably decrease the effectiveness of vaccines, thus escalating the threat to global public health. Nevertheless, vaccines continue to demonstrate high efficacy in preventing severe illness, hospitalization and death against these variants (3,4). Without effective treatment, the virus can cause serious respiratory disease, similar to SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome. Some cases of COVID-19 involve acute respiratory distress syndrome or septic shock, which causes pressure and challenges to the global medical and health system and consumes limited medical resources (5). Countries worldwide are actively responding to the COVID-19 pandemic and have formulated policies, such as wearing masks in public, social distancing and quarantining communities and cities. Despite these measures, the COVID-19 pandemic continues. Certain studies suggest vaccination may be the most effective measure to prevent COVID-19 infection (6,7). At present, most COVID-19 vaccines are based on recombinant subunit proteins, virus-like particles, messenger RNA, DNA and viral vectors (8).

Although COVID-19 infection primarily causes respiratory symptoms, the virus may also damage other organs and the kidney is one of the main sites of complications (9). Studies have shown that coronavirus infection increases serum creatinine levels and acute tubular necrosis, which may lead to impaired renal function (10,11). Clinical studies have shown that patients with COVID-19 have acute renal injury (10,12). At the same time, studies have shown that chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for COVID-19 death (13,14). The mortality rate among patients with CKD and COVID-19 is significantly higher than that of non-nephrotic patients and non-dialysis CKD patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the severity of the disease is more pronounced in elderly patients (15-17). With the rapid mutation rate of the virus, there are still some doubts about the effectiveness and safety of existing vaccines (18-20). The present study aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of the immune response of patients with CKD receiving hemodialysis (HD) and COVID-19 vaccine.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

An electronic search was performed in PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/wos/), Science Direct (https://www.sciencedirect.com/), and Cochrane Library (cochranelibrary.com/) from January 2019 until December 31, 2022, to identify eligible trials without any publication status restrictions. Data S1 shows the detailed search strategy for each database. Of the 327 identified articles, 33 fulfilled our inclusion criteria (Fig. 1).

Study selection

Inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Prospective cohort study, randomized controlled trial or cross-sectional study; ii) reported the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine response and iii) studies reporting adverse events and COVID-19 vaccine safety.

Data extraction

A total of two investigators independently performed the literature search and data selection. Discrepancies were resolved by the third reviewer. Extracted data included number of participants, occurrence of endpoints of interest, mean age at baseline, percentage of male participants, body mass index (BMI), dialysis vintage and vaccine.

Quality assessment

The study used a Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for bias detection (21), which includes seven component (bias due to confounding, bias in selection of participants into the study, bias in classification of Interventions, bias due to deviations from intended interventions, bias due to missing data, bias in measurement of outcomes, and bias in selection of the reported result. Overall bias was identified as low, medium or serious bias.

Statistical analysis

The present study summarized the seropositivity rate and adverse events of patients with CKD undergoing dialysis who received the COVID-19 vaccine as outcome indicators. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic as follows: 0-40, no significant heterogeneity; 30-60, moderate heterogeneity; 50-90 substantial heterogeneity and 75-100%, considerable heterogeneity (22). If I2 statistic ≥50%, the random benefit model was used; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. Data reported as median and interquartile range were converted to mean and SD as previously described (23). Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.1 (revman.cochrane.org/info) and STATA 18.0 (stata.com/). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Study characteristics

A total of 327 studies were initially retrieved. Of these, 294 were excluded due to lack of relevant outcomes, patients who did not have CKD or receive dialysis or COVID-19 vaccine and articles published in a language other than English. Finally, 33 trials with a total of 81,348 patients were included in the meta-analysis (24-56) and mean dialysis vintage was 2.1 years. Details of age, BMI, dialysis vintage, and vaccine name included in the analysis are presented in Table I. At baseline, the mean age was 64.9 years and the mean percentage of male participants was 59.4%.

Table I

Characteristics of the baseline population included in trials.

Table I

Characteristics of the baseline population included in trials.

First author/sYearCountrySample sizePopulationPrior COVID infectionMean age, yearsMale, %Mean BMI, kg/m²Mean dialysis vintage, monthsVaccineDose(Refs.)
Agur et al2021Israel122HD/PDNo71.633.626.739.7BNT162b22(24)
Alkadi et al2022Switzerland782HDMixed57.064.1NRNR BNT162b2/mRNA-12733(43)
Ben-Dov et al2022Italian175HDMixed65.160.0NR32.0BNT162b22(44)
Bielopolski et al2022Israel67,861CKDNo76.048.029.0NRBNT162b22(45)
Broseta et al2021Spain78HDNo67.167.9NR94.3mRNA-12732(25)
Butt et al2022USA6,076HDNo69.096.727.8NR BNT162b2/mRNA-12732(46)
Clavero et al2022Switzerland81HDMixed62.658.3NRNRBNT162b2/Corona Vac2(56)
Cserep et al2021UK83HDNo73.060.029.527.0BNT162b22(36)
Davidovic et al2022Austria36HDNo66.966.7NR35.0 BNT162b2/Ad26COVS13(48)
Duarte et al2021Portugal67HD/PDNo67.859.5NRNRBNT162b22(47)
Ducloux et al2021France45HDMixedNRNRNRNRBNT162b22/3(51)
Espi et al2021France106HD/PDNo64.965.026.550.7BNT162b22(52)
Fernando et al2021India42HDNoNRNRNRNR ChAdOx1-nCoV-19/BBV1522(53)
Frantzen et al2021France326HDNo71.370.0NRNRBNT162b22(54)
Goupil et al2021Canada131HDMixed70.077.0NR45.6BNT162b21(55)
Labriola et al2021Belgium79HDMixed80.744.0NRNRBNT162b22(26)
Lesny et al2021Germany23HDNo69.355.627.929.7 BNT162b2/ChAdOx1-nCoV-191(27)
Longlune et al2021France82HDNo64.068.8NR39.0BNT162b22(28)
Quiroga et al2022Spain1,116HDMixed65.064.0NRNR BNT162b2/mRNA-1273/ChAdOx1-S/Ad26.COV.22(49)
Rincon-Arevalo et al2021Germany41HDNo71.370.0NR66.0BNT162b22(29)
Sattler et al2021Germany26HDNo67.465.4NR82.4BNT162b22(30)
Schrezenmeier et al2021Germany36HDNo74.069.4NR64.0BNT162b22(31)
Simon et al2021Austria81HDNo67.055NRNRBNT162b22(32)
Speer et al2021Germany30HDNo78.76025.337.3BNT162b22(33)
Speer et al2021Germany43HDNo83.06326.08.0BNT162b22(34)
Strengert et al2021Germany81HDNo69.058NRNRBNT162b22(35)
Stumpf et al2021Germany3,100HDNo67.665.127.568.4 mRNA-1273/BNT162b22(37)
Torreggiani et al2021France132HDNo68.959NR30.8BNT162b22(38)
Trakarnvanich et al2022Thailand12CKDNo63.17522.5NR ChAdOx1-nCoV-192(50)
Tylicki et al2021Poland91HDNo69.361.525.736.0BNT162b22(39)
Weigert et al2021Portugal156HDNo64.067.8NRNRBNT162b22(40)
Yanay et al2021Israel160HDNo69.763NR40.8BNT162b22(41)
Zitt et al2021Austria48HDNo67.668NRNRBNT162b22(42)

[i] HD, hemodialysis; PD, Peritoneal dialysis; CKD, Chronic kidney disease; NR, Not reported.

Quality assessment

ROBINS-I (21) was used by two independent authors to evaluate the quality of studies; the overall quality of was good. Of the 33 trials, 21 were considered low, 10 medium and two serious risk of bias (Table SI).

Endpoints

Seropositivity rate of patients with CKD and dialysis after vaccination was 80% (95 CI, 73-87%) and the heterogeneity was I2=98.9% (Fig. 2). After removing Bielopolski et al (45) and Stumpf et al (37) due to large sample size, the sensitivity analysis found that the seropositivity rate remained unchanged but the heterogeneity was reduced (I2=96.4%; Fig. S1). Seropositivity rate of patients without a history of COVID-19 infection was lower than that of patients with a history of infection [Fig. 3; 76.48% (3,824/5,000) of uninfected and 80.82% (1,858/2,299) of patients with a history of infection]. In addition, the antibody titers of patients with CKD and dialysis who had a history of COVID-19 infection were compared; SMD was 27.73 (95% CI, -19.58-75.04), indicating no significant difference (Fig. 4).

A total of nine trials reported adverse events. Safety outcomes assessed were as follows: Pain at injection site, redness, swelling, fatigue, headache and diarrhea (Table II). Pain at injection site was the most common adverse event, accounting for 18% (95 CI, 6-29%; Fig. 5). Other common adverse events were fatigue and headache, accounting for 8 (95 CI, 4-13%) and 6% (95 CI, 2-9%), respectively (Figs. S2 and S3).

Table II

Adverse events after vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis.

Table II

Adverse events after vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis.

First author/sYearSample sizeNew infection (%)Death (%)Pain at the injection site (%)Redness (%)Swelling (%)Fatigue (%)Headache (%)Diarrhea (%)(Refs.)
Cserep et al2021830 (0.0)0(0.0)NRNR2 (2.4)9 (10.8)7 (8.4)1 (1.2)(36)
Fernando et al2021382 (5.3)NRNRNRNRNRNRNR(53)
Longlune et al20211090 (0.0)NR15 (13.8)NRNR15 (13.8)NRNR(28)
Quiroga et al20221116NR8 (0.7)NRNRNRNRNRNR(49)
Simon et al202181NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR(32)
Speer et al202143NRNR4 (9.3)NRNR2 (4.6)2 (4.6)NR(34)
Strengert et al202181NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR(35)
Yanay et al20211606 (3.75)NRNRNRNRNRNRNR(41)
Zitt et al202148NRNR16 (33.4)NRNR2 (4.2)2 (4.2)1 (2.1)(42)

[i] NR, not reported.

Discussion

The present meta-analysis showed that the immune efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with CKD undergoing dialysis was good and the seropositivity rate was 80%. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had higher seropositivity rate. The primary adverse events were pain at the injection site and fatigue after vaccination but the overall safety was high. Therefore, administering the COVID-19 vaccine significantly enhances protection against severe outcomes.

In recent years, CKD has become an increasingly serious global health problem (57,58). It is defined as kidney injury or glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 for ≥3 months (59). When patients with end-stage renal disease develop uremia, they need regular dialysis to survive. Studies have shown that COVID-19 invasion of the kidney can impair renal function (60-62). Effective vaccination strategies are crucial for patients with CKD, as the decreased efficiency of the immune system impairs vaccine-induced immunization (63). The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted research on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with CKD and kidney transplant recipients with the aim of improving efficacy (64). In patients with CKD, the seroconversion rate is reduced after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and anti-spike antibody titers are lower than those in healthy individuals (65,66). According to Babel et al (67) in patients with CKD, immunological aging and persistent inflammation decreases the efficacy of vaccination. Patients with CKD, especially those who have renal failure, are at high risk of experiencing severe adverse effects of COVID-19(68). After receiving two doses of mRNA vaccine, most kidney transplant recipients do not establish humoral immunity despite seroconversion rates comparable to those of persons with normal renal function (69). However, some people continue to have a T cell response unique to the vaccination, which may protect against severe COVID-19. Studies have shown that elderly patients, especially men and those with cardiovascular or chronic liver disease, hypertension and CKD, are more likely to be infected with COVID-19, and the disease severity and death risk are also high (70,71). COVID-19 vaccine has a notable impact on the immune status of patients. Some studies have shown that patients undergoing renal dialysis patients may exhibit a weaker vaccine-induced immune response (72-74). According to studies, age and sex also affect immune response (75,76). Seropositivity rate of patients aged >60 years following vaccination is lower than that of those aged <60 years, which may be due to relatively strong immune system in young people leading to higher vaccine efficacy (77,78). Relevant studies have demonstrated out that sex affects seropositivity rate: The antibody response of female patients to virus infection and vaccines is usually higher than that of males (76,79,80). Studies have shown that patients who have been infected with COVID-19 have a higher seropositivity rate, indicating that history of infection can increase the concentration of antibodies (81,82). As the virus further, protective efficiency of vaccines also decrease. This can also explain why there is no significant difference between antibody levels of patients with a history of COVID-19 and those without a history of infection (83). In addition, when condition of patients with CKD is stable, COVID-19 vaccine is recommended. Studies have shown that the mRNA-1273 vaccine can induces higher antibody levels than the BNT162b2 vaccine, but the incidence of adverse events is also higher, requiring care in vaccine selection (84,85). Repeated doses of the COVID-19 vaccine improve the antibody levels and serum conversion rate of patients with kidney disease. Therefore, it is important to enhance vaccination programs, which is an important means of preventing COVID-19 infection (86-88). A recent investigation by Puspitasari et al (89) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in individuals with end-stage renal disease undergoing HD. The aforementioned study observed no noteworthy distinctions in all measures of immunogenicity between 75 patients receiving HD and 71 healthy controls: The findings revealed no significant variations in anti- receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) inhibition and seroconversion rates between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events also showed no significant difference. The study concluded that primary administration of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination generates an effective antibody response and can be safely administered to individuals undergoing HD. Moreover, a systematic review (90) examining the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with CKD undergoing maintenance HD revealed that two doses of COVID-19 vaccines were effective: Seroconversion rates for humoral response were 81-97% and T cell responses were observed in 67-100% of cases. COVID-19 vaccinations demonstrated no significant adverse effects and can be considered safe. In most HD studies, a single dose does not enhance the humoral immune response, but a double dose was improves seroconversion rates and humoral immune response (26,56). If the patient is in the stage of acute and chronic nephritis and takes hormone and immunosuppressive drugs for a long time, it is not recommended to administer the COVID-19 vaccine (91). In addition, the inactivated COVID-19 and recombinant protein vaccine are recommended for nephrotic patients; the vaccination should not be administered to patients allergic to the COVID-19 vaccine and its components (92).

Injection site pain and local injection site reactions are some of the most common reactions (93). Following COVID-19 vaccination, the body exhibits an immune response and the muscles at the injection site may become inflamed, leading to pain (94). In addition, some inactivated vaccines use aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant to strengthen immunity. Certain scholars believe that aluminum hydroxide is related to the pain at the injection site after inoculation (95,96). The present results show that there is a fatigue reaction following injection of the COVID-19 vaccine, which may be due to brain hypoxia caused by excessive tension, which leads to muscle weakness and fatigue. If the patient has headaches after COVID-19 vaccination, the first thing to consider is psychological factors such as fear, mistrust, and conspiracy beliefs. Usually, after a few hours, the headache disappears when the individual relaxes. This is consistent with previous studies on major adverse events following COVID-19 vaccine injection (97,98).

The present study has limitations. First, most of the studies included were inpatient cases, which may not fully represent all infected people in the region, especially asymptomatic cases. In addition, the included studies did not obtain information about the characteristics, onset time, duration and acute treatment response of side effects. Finally, further research is needed to determine the protection level of naturally acquired antibodies against mutant strains and the durability of protection. Therefore, further research with a larger sample size is required, considering the specific immune and physical conditions of patients.

In conclusion, immune response of patients with CKD undergoing dialysis was effective, which indicated that COVID-19 vaccine injection can reduce the incidence of COVID-19 in patients. In addition, there were few common adverse events and there were no potentially vaccine-related serious adverse events. Therefore, the COVID-19 vaccine should be administered, considering the individual immune levels of patients.

Supplementary Material

Search strategy of electronic database.
Seropositivity rate of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis and receiving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine after removing studies with large sample sizes. DL, DerSimonian-Laird.
Forest plot of fatigue after receiving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine. DL, DerSimonian-Laird method.
Forest plot of headache after receiving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine. DL, DerSimonian-Laird.
Risk of bias assessment according to Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article.

Authors' contributions

KJ, YX and HY conceived and designed the study. XS and BS designed the search strategy and performed quality assessment. XS and BS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data All authors analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Vallée A: Geoepidemiological perspective on COVID-19 pandemic review, an insight into the global impact. Front Public Health. 11(1242891)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Khoury DS, Docken SS, Subbarao K, Kent SJ, Davenport MP and Cromer D: Predicting the efficacy of variant-modified COVID-19 vaccine boosters. Nat Med. 29:574–578. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Carabelli AM, Peacock TP, Thorne LG, Harvey WT and Hughes J: COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium. Peacock SJ, Barclay WS, de Silva TI, Towers GJ and Robertson DL: SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: Immune escape, transmission and fitness. Nat Rev Microbiol. 21:162–177. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Bouhaddou M, Reuschl AK, Polacco BJ, Thorne LG, Ummadi MR, Ye C, Rosales R, Pelin A, Batra J, Jang GM, et al: SARS-CoV-2 variants evolve convergent strategies to remodel the host response. Cell. 186:4597–4614.e26. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Jiang S, Xia S, Ying T and Lu L: A novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing pneumonia-associated respiratory syndrome. Cell Mol Immunol. 17(554)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Qualls N, Levitt A, Kanade N, Wright-Jegede N, Dopson S, Biggerstaff M, Reed C and Uzicanin A: CDC Community Mitigation Guidelines Work Group. Community mitigation guidelines to prevent pandemic influenza-United States, 2017. MMWR Recomm Rep. 66:1–34. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Farsalinos K, Poulas K, Kouretas D, Vantarakis A, Leotsinidis M, Kouvelas D, Docea AO, Kostoff R, Gerotziafas GT, Antoniou MN, et al: Improved strategies to counter the COVID-19 pandemic: Lockdowns vs. primary and community healthcare. Toxicol Rep. 8:1–9. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Li H, Burm SW, Hong SH, Ghayda RA, Kronbichler A, Smith L, Koyanagi A, Jacob L, Lee KH and Shin JI: A comprehensive review of coronavirus disease 2019: Epidemiology, transmission, risk factors, and international responses. Yonsei Med J. 62:1–11. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Perico L, Benigni A, Casiraghi F, Ng LFP, Renia L and Remuzzi G: Immunity, endothelial injury and complement-induced coagulopathy in COVID-19. Nat Rev Nephrol. 17:46–64. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Wu VC, Hsueh PR, Lin WC, Huang JW, Tsai HB, Chen YM and Wu KD: SARS Research Group of the National Taiwan University College of Medicine and National University Hospital. Acute renal failure in SARS patients: More than rhabdomyolysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 19:3180–3182. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Cha RH, Joh JS, Jeong I, Lee JY, Shin HS, Kim G and Kim Y: Critical Care Team of National Medical Center. Renal complications and their prognosis in Korean patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus from the central MERS-CoV designated hospital. J Korean Med Sci. 30:1807–1814. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Chan JFW, Yuan S, Kok KH, To KK, Chu H, Yang J, Xing F, Liu J, Yip CC, Poon RW, et al: A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet. 395:514–523. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Gansevoort RT and Hilbrands LB: CKD is a key risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Nat Rev Nephrol. 16:705–706. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Pakhchanian H, Raiker R, Mukherjee A, Khan A, Singh S and Chatterjee A: Outcomes of COVID-19 in CKD patients: A multicenter electronic medical record cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 16:785–786. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

ERA-EDTA Council; ERACODA Working Group. Chronic kidney disease is a key risk factor for severe COVID-19: A call to action by the ERA-EDTA. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 36:87–94. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Bajwa H, Riaz Y, Ammar M, Farooq S and Yousaf A: The dilemma of renal involvement in COVID-19: A systematic review. Cureus. 12(e8632)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE and Hsu C: Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 351:1296–1305. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

O'Callaghan KP, Blatz AM and Offit PA: Developing a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at warp speed. JAMA. 324:437–438. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Calina D, Hartung T, Docea AO, Spandidos DA, Egorov AM, Shtilman MI, Carvalho F and Tsatsakis A: COVID-19 vaccines: Ethical framework concerning human challenge studies. Daru. 28:807–812. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Sharpe HR, Gilbride C, Allen E, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Bissett C, Ewer K and Lambe T: The early landscape of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine development in the UK and rest of the world. Immunology. 160:223–232. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, et al: ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 355(i4919)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP and Thomas J: Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: A new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10(ED000142)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J and Tong T: Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 14(135)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Agur T, Ben-Dor N, Goldman S, Lichtenberg S, Herman-Edelstein M, Yahav D, Rozen-Zvi B and Zingerman B: Antibody response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among dialysis patients-a prospectivecohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 11(gfab155)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Broseta JJ, Rodríguez-Espinosa D, Soruco E and Maduell F: Weekly seroconversion rate of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 36:1754–1755. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Labriola L, Scohy A, Van Regemorter E, Robert A, Clerbaux G, Gillerot G, Pochet JM, Biller P, De Schuiteneer M, Morelle J, et al: Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a multicenter cohort of nursing home residents receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 78:766–768. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Lesny P, Anderson M, Cloherty G, Stec M, Haase-Fielitz A, Haarhaus M, Santos C, Lucas C, Macario F and Haase M: Immunogenicity of a first dose of mRNA- or vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in dialysis patients: A multicenter prospective observational pilot study. J Nephrol. 34:975–983. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Longlune N, Nogier MB, Miedougé M, Gabilan C, Cartou C, Seigneuric B, Del Bello A, Marion O, Faguer S, Izopet J and Kamar N: High immunogenicity of a messenger RNA-based vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 36:1704–1709. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Rincon-Arevalo H, Choi M, Stefanski AL, Halleck F, Weber U, Szelinski F, Jahrsdörfer B, Schrezenmeier H, Ludwig C, Sattler A, et al: Impaired humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients and dialysis patients. Sci Immunol. 6(eabj1031)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Sattler A, Schrezenmeier E, Weber UA, Potekhin A, Bachmann F, Straub-Hohenbleicher H, Budde K, Storz E, Proß V, Bergmann Y, et al: Impaired humoral and cellular immunity after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 (tozinameran) prime-boost vaccination in kidney transplant recipients. J Clin Invest. 131(e150175)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Schrezenmeier E, Bergfeld L, Hillus D, Lippert JD, Weber U, Tober-Lau P, Landgraf I, Schwarz T, Kappert K, Stefanski AL, et al: Immunogenicity of COVID-19 tozinameran vaccination in patients on chronic dialysis. Front Immunol. 12(690698)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Simon B, Rubey H, Treipl A, Gromann M, Hemedi B, Zehetmayer S and Kirsch B: Haemodialysis patients show a highly diminished antibody response after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination compared with healthy controls. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 36:1709–1716. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Speer C, Benning L, Töllner M, Nusshag C, Kälble F, Reichel P, Schaier M, Bartenschlager M, Schnitzler P, Zeier M, et al: Neutralizing antibody response against variants of concern after vaccination of dialysis patients with BNT162b2. Kidney Int. 100:700–702. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Speer C, Morath C, Töllner M, Buylaert M, Göth D, Nusshag C, Kälble F, Schaier M, Grenz J, Kreysing M, et al: Humoral responses to single-dose BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in dialysis patients previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Front Med (Lausanne). 8(721286)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Strengert M, Becker M, Ramos GM, Dulovic A, Gruber J, Juengling J, Lürken K, Beigel A, Wrenger E, Lonnemann G, et al: Cellular and humoral immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in patients on haemodialysis. EBioMedicine. 70(103524)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Cserep G, Morrow D, Latchford K, Jesset R, Dosa A and Kirmizis D: The effect of a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine on the incidence of severe COVID-19 infection in patients on chronic hemodialysis: A single-centre study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 26:54–58. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Stumpf J, Siepmann T, Lindner T, Karger C, Schwöbel J, Anders L, Faulhaber-Walter R, Schewe J, Martin H, Schirutschke H, et al: Humoral and cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in renal transplant versus dialysis patients: A prospective, multicenter observational study using mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Lancet Reg Heal Eur. 9(100178)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Torreggiani M, Blanchi S, Fois A, Fessi H and Piccoli GB: Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in dialysis patients after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: The war is far from being won. Kidney Int. 99:1494–1496. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Tylicki L, Biedunkiewicz B, Dąbrowska M, Ślizień W, Tylicki P, Polewska K, Rosenberg I, Rodak S and Dębska-Ślizień A: Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination promises to improve the catastrophic prognosis of hemodialysis patients as a result of COVID-19: The COViNEPH project. Polish Arch Intern Med. 131:797–801. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Weigert A, Bergman ML, Gonçalves LA, Godinho I, Duarte N, Abrantes R, Borges P, Brennand A, Malheiro V, Matoso P, et al: Longitudinal analysis of antibody responses to the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: A 6-month follow-up. Front Med (Lausanne). 8(796676)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Yanay NB, Freiman S, Shapira M, Wishahi S, Hamze M, Elhaj M, Zaher M and Armaly Z: Experience with SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 99:1496–1498. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Zitt E, Davidovic T, Schimpf J, Abbassi-Nik A, Mutschlechner B, Ulmer H, Benda MA, Sprenger-Mähr H, Winder T and Lhotta K: The safety and immunogenicity of the mRNA-BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Hemodialysis patients. Front Immunol. 12(704773)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Alkadi MM, Hamad A, Ghazouani H, Elshirbeny M, Ali MY, Ghonimi T, Ibrahim R, Abuhelaiqa E, Abou-Samra AB, Al-Malki H and Butt AA: Effectiveness of messenger RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients: A case-control study. Vaccines (Basel). 11(49)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Ben-Dov IZ, Oster Y, Tzukert K, Alster T, Bader R, Israeli R, Asayag H, Aharon M, Burstein I, Pri-Chen H, et al: Impact of tozinameran (BNT162b2) mRNA vaccine on kidney transplant and chronic dialysis patients: 3-5 months follow-up. J Nephrol. 35:153–164. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Bielopolski D, Libresco G, Barda N, Dagan N, Steinmetz T, Yahav D, Charytan DM, Balicer RD and Rozen-Zvi B: BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness in chronic kidney disease patients-an observational study. Clin Kidney J. 15:1838–1846. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Butt AA, Talisa VB, Yan P, Shaikh OS, Omer SB and Mayr FB: Real-World effectiveness of the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccines in preventing confirmed infection in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Clin Infect Dis. 75:e617–e622. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Duarte R, Roldão M, Figueiredo C, Luz I, Ferrer F, Gonçalves H, Sofia F and Lopes K: Humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients: A comparative study. Ther Apher Dial. 26:790–796. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Davidovic T, Schimpf J, Abbassi-Nik A, Stockinger R, Sprenger-Mähr H, Lhotta K and Zitt E: Humoral and cellular immune response after a 3-dose heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using the mRNA-BNT162b2 and viral vector Ad26COVS1 vaccine in hemodialysis patients. Front Immunol. 13(907615)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, Vaquera SM, Mantecón CJ, Useche G, Márquez MG, Carnerero M, Rodríguez MT, Ramos PM, et al: Safety and immediate humoral response of COVID-19 vaccines in chronic kidney disease patients: The SENCOVAC study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 37:1868–1878. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Trakarnvanich T, Ngamvichchukorn T, Phumisantiphong U, Pholtawornkulchai K, Phochanasomboon K and Manomaipiboon A: Immune response after COVID-19 vaccination among patients with chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant. Vaccine. 40:6499–6511. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Ducloux D, Colladant M, Chabannes M, Yannaraki M and Courivaud C: Humoral response after 3 doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients on hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 100:702–704. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Espi M, Charmetant X, Barba T, Koppe L, Pelletier C, Kalbacher E, Chalencon E, Mathias V, Ovize A, Cart-Tanneur E, et al: The ROMANOV study found impaired humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in virus-unexposed patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 100:928–936. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Fernando E and Govindan S: Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibody response and protective effect of 2 Doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BBV152 vaccines in hemodialysis patients: A preliminary report. Kidney Int Rep. 6:2521–2522. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Frantzen L, Cavaille G, Thibeaut S and El-Haik Y: Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a hemodialysis cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 36:1756–1757. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Goupil R, Benlarbi M, Beaubien-Souligny W, Nadeau-Fredette AC, Chatterjee D, Goyette G, Gunaratnam L, Lamarche C, Tom A, Finzi A, et al: Short-term antibody response after 1 dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. CMAJ. 193:E793–E800. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Clavero R, Parra-Lucares A, Méndez-Valdés G, Villa E, Bravo K, Mondaca E, Aranda J, Brignardello R, Gajardo C, Ordenes A, et al: Humoral immune response of BNT162b2 and coronavac vaccinations in hemodialysis patients: A multicenter prospective cohort. Vaccines (Basel). 10(1542)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Liu W, Zhou L, Yin W, Wang J and Zuo X: Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease attributable to high sodium intake from 1990 to 2019. Front Nutr. 10(1078371)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Kovesdy CP: Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: An update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 12:7–11. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Locatelli F, Nissenson AR, Barrett BJ, Walker RG, Wheeler DC, Eckardt KU, Lameire NH and Eknoyan G: Clinical practice guidelines for Anemia in chronic kidney disease: Problems and solutions. A position statement from kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 74:1237–1240. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Zou X, Chen K, Zou J, Han P, Hao J and Han Z: Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med. 14:185–192. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Diao B, Wang C, Wang R, Feng Z, Zhang J, Yang H, Tan Y, Wang H, Wang C, Liu L, et al: Human kidney is a target for novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Nat Commun. 12(2506)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Martinez-Rojas MA, Vega-Vega O and Bobadilla NA: Is the kidney a target of SARS-CoV-2? Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 318:F1454–F1462. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Sanhueza ME, Martín PS, Brantes L, Caro S, Carrasco G and Machuca E: Efficacy of vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 19(2173904)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Hou YC, Lu KC and Kuo KL: The efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation patients: A narrative review. Vaccines (Basel). 9(885)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Rossi M, Pessolano G and Gambaro G: What has vaccination against COVID-19 in CKD patients taught us? J Nephrol. 36:1257–1266. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Martins MP and de Oliveira RB: COVID-19 and chronic kidney disease: A narrative review. COVID. 3:1092–1105. 2023.

67 

Babel N, Hugo C and Westhoff TH: Vaccination in patients with kidney failure: Lessons from COVID-19. Nat Rev Nephrol. 18:708–723. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Jiang Z, Liu J, Geng L, Zhong Z, Tan J, Wen D, Zhou L, Tang Y and Qin W: The influences of COVID-19 on patients with chronic kidney disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Front Psychiatry. 12(754310)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Rozen-Zvi B, Yahav D, Agur T, Zingerman B, Ben-Zvi H, Atamna A, Tau N, Mashraki T, Nesher E and Rahamimov R: Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine among kidney transplant recipients: A prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 27:1173.e1–1173.e4. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Kunutsor SK and Laukkanen JA: Markers of liver injury and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 82:159–198. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Bohn MK, Loh TP, Wang CB, Mueller R, Koch D, Sethi S, Rawlinson WD, Clementi M, Erasmus R, Leportier M, et al: IFCC interim guidelines on serological testing of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Clin Chem Lab Med. 58:2001–2008. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Ma BM, Tam AR, Chan KW, Ma MKM, Hung IFN, Yap DYH and Chan TM: Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 9(827859)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Javadinia SA, Alizadeh K, Mojadadi MS, Nikbakht F, Dashti F, Joudi M, Harati H, Welsh JS, Farahmand SA and Attarian F: COVID-19 vaccination in patients with malignancy; a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13(860238)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Joudi M, Binabaj MM, Porouhan P, PeyroShabany B, Tabasi M, Fazilat-Panah D, Khajeh M, Mehrabian A, Dehghani M, Welsh JS, et al: A cohort study on the immunogenicity and safety of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) in patients with breast cancer; does trastuzumab interfere with the outcome? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13(798975)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Ciarambino T, Para O and Giordano M: Immune system and COVID-19 by sex differences and age. Womens Health (Lond). 17(17455065211022262)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Ho JQ, Sepand MR, Bigdelou B, Shekarian T, Esfandyarpour R, Chauhan P, Serpooshan V, Beura LK, Hutter G and Zanganeh S: The immune response to COVID-19: Does sex matter? Immunology. 166:429–443. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

77 

Collier DA, Ferreira IATM, Kotagiri P, Datir RP, Lim EY, Touizer E, Meng B and Abdullahi A: CITIID-NIHR BioResource COVID-19 Collaboration. Elmer A, et al: Age-related immune response heterogeneity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2. Nature. 596:417–422. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Chen Q, Zhao H, Yao X, Lin Z, Li J, Lin B, Wang R, Huang Y, Su Y, Wu T, et al: Comparing immunogenicity of the Escherichia coli-produced bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in females of different ages. Vaccine. 38:6096–6102. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

79 

Fernandes M da CR, Vasconcelos GS, de Melo ACL, Matsui TC, Caetano LF, de Carvalho Araújo FM and Fonseca MHG: Influence of age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and pre-existing diseases in antibody response after COVID-19 vaccination: A review. Mol Immunol. 156:148–155. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY and Xie X: COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 17:259–260. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Barnes E, Goodyear CS, Willicombe M, Gaskell C, Siebert S, de Silva TI, Murray SM, Rea D, Snowden JA, Carroll M, et al: SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses and clinical outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-suppressive disease. Nat Med. 29:1760–1774. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

82 

Letizia AG, Ge Y, Vangeti S, Goforth C, Weir DL, Kuzmina NA, Balinsky CA, Chen HW, Ewing D, Soares-Schanoski A, et al: SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and subsequent infection risk in healthy young adults: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 9:712–720. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

83 

Brüssow H: COVID-19: Vaccination problems. Environ Microbiol. 23:2878–2890. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

84 

Sáez-Peñataro J, Torres F, Bartra J, Bascuas J, Vilella A, Tortajada M, Quesada S, González E, López-Suñé E, Castells A, et al: Tolerability and reactogenicity profile of mRNA SARS-Cov-2 vaccines from a mass vaccination campaign in a tertiary hospital: Between-vaccine and between-population prospective observational study (VigilVacCOVID Study). BioDrugs. 36:509–520. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

85 

Al-Sadeq DW, Shurrab FM, Ismail A, Amanullah FH, Thomas S, Aldewik N, Yassine HM, Rahim HF, Abu-Raddad L and Nasralla GK: Comparison of antibody immune responses between BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in naïve and previously infected individuals. J Travel Med. 28(taab190)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

86 

Kitagawa H, Kaiki Y, Sugiyama A, Nagashima S, Kurisu A, Nomura T, Omori K, Akita T, Shigemoto N, Tanaka J and Ohge H: Adverse reactions to the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 28:576–581. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

87 

Hulme WJ, Horne EMF, Parker EPK, Keogh RH, Williamson EJ, Walker V, Palmer TM, Curtis HJ, Walker AJ, Andrews CD, et al: Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: Matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP. BMJ. 380(e072808)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

88 

Ono S, Michihata N, Yamana H, Uemura K, Ono Y, Jo T and Yasunaga H: Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 booster dose after BNT162b2 primary vaccination against the omicron variants: A retrospective cohort study using large-scale population-based registries in Japan. Clin Infect Dis. 76:18–24. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

89 

Puspitasari M, Sattwika PD, Rahari DS, Wijaya W, Hidayat ARP, Kertia N, Purwanto B and Thobari JA: Immunogenicity and safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in haemodialysis patients: A prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 13(11557)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

90 

Mehta N, Shah S, Paudel K, Chamlagain R and Chhetri S: Safety and efficacy of coronavirus disease-19 vaccines in chronic kidney disease patients under maintenance hemodialysis: A systematic review. Heal Sci Rep. 5(e700)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

91 

Wang Y, Yang L and Xu G: New-onset acute interstitial nephritis Post-SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: A panoramic review. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 13:615–636. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

92 

Zhang S, He J, Tang B, Zhou Q, Hu Y, Yu Y, Chen J, Liu Y, Li C, Ren H and Liao X: Cellular and humoral responses to recombinant and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in CKD Patients: An observational study. J Clin Med. 12(1225)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

93 

Qaderi K, Golezar MH, Mardani A, Mallah MA, Moradi B, Kavoussi H, Shamsabadi A and Golezar S: Cutaneous adverse reactions of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review. Dermatol Ther. 35(e15391)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

94 

Tan SW, Tam YC and Pang SM: Cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: A review. JAAD Int. 7:178–186. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Sharif N, Alzahrani KJ, Ahmed SN and Dey SK: Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 12(714170)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

96 

Xia S, Duan K, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Zhang H, Xie Z, Li X, Peng C, Zhang Y, Zhang W, et al: Effect of an inactivated vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 on safety and immunogenicity outcomes: Interim analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 324:951–960. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

97 

Chen M, Yuan Y, Zhou Y, Deng Z, Zhao J, Feng F, Zou H and Sun C: Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Infect Dis Poverty. 10(94)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

98 

Wu Q, Dudley MZ, Chen X, Bai X, Dong K, Zhuang T, Salmon D and Yu H: Evaluation of the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid review. BMC Med. 19(173)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2024
Volume 20 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li K, Xia Y, Ye H, Sun X, Shi B and Wu J: Effectiveness and safety of immune response to SARS‑CoV‑2 vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease and dialysis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Biomed Rep 20: 78, 2024
APA
Li, K., Xia, Y., Ye, H., Sun, X., Shi, B., & Wu, J. (2024). Effectiveness and safety of immune response to SARS‑CoV‑2 vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease and dialysis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Biomedical Reports, 20, 78. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1766
MLA
Li, K., Xia, Y., Ye, H., Sun, X., Shi, B., Wu, J."Effectiveness and safety of immune response to SARS‑CoV‑2 vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease and dialysis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis". Biomedical Reports 20.5 (2024): 78.
Chicago
Li, K., Xia, Y., Ye, H., Sun, X., Shi, B., Wu, J."Effectiveness and safety of immune response to SARS‑CoV‑2 vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease and dialysis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis". Biomedical Reports 20, no. 5 (2024): 78. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1766