Recurrent vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia successfully treated with topical imiquimod: A case report

Introduction

Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a rare disease associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The incidence of VAIN has been reported at approximately 0.2-0.3 per 100,000 women and is considered to be a precursor of vaginal carcinoma (1). In the World Health Organization (WHO) 2014 classification, VAIN lesions are graded as vaginal low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL and HSIL, respectively) with LSIL including VAIN 1 and HSIL including VAIN 2 and VAIN 3. VAIN 1 can also be considered a form of productive HPV infection, which can be expectantly managed with a spontaneous regression rate of over 50% (2). VAIN 2 and 3 are considered precancerous lesions, so treatment is required for high-grade VAIN. Especially, VAIN 3 owes to the high risk of progression to carcinoma in approximately 11-13% of cases (3). However, current treatment recommendations vary, and there is no universally accepted standard of care as the best treatment modality (4).

High-grade VAIN is usually treated with either excisional or ablative therapy, however recurrent VAIN lesions are common and require repeat treatments which may be mutilating and cause vaginal scarring (3). Imiquimod is a toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist which modulates an immune response by inducing secretion of interferon-α and interferon-γ, and is used for the treatment of condylomas and other HPV-related neoplasias including VAIN (5). Recently some studies have reported that 5% imiquimod is an effective treatment for VAIN (5,6).

We here report a case of a woman who was diagnosed with recurrent VAIN 3 and treated with 5% topical imiquimod cream after surgical treatment and achieved a complete response. This case thus provides further evidence for the clinical efficacy and safety of 5% topical imiquimod in the treatment of recurrent VAIN.

Case report

A 53-year-old, gravida 5, para 2 postmenopausal woman with no past medical history was diagnosed with papillary squamous cell carcinoma by biopsy (Fig. 1) and underwent conization, resulting in a pathological diagnosis of grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed and a histological examination revealed CIN 3 with free surgical margins.

Figure 1 Biopsy of the cervical tumor. Papillary squamous cell carcinoma was observed. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining. Magnification, x4. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining. Magnification, x10.

Eight months after the hysterectomy, a vaginal smear revealed atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H). Because no abnormal mitosis was observed in the biopsy, p16 was negative and Mib-1 index was 0.1-1%, atrophy or maturation arrest of squamous epithelia was suspected. Cytology further revealed ASC-H in succession with no apparent finding related to invasive carcinoma; therefore, careful follow-up was decided with no further treatment.

Three years after the hysterectomy, a follow-up vaginal smear revealed ASC-H, and vaginoscopy after the application of acetic acid showed increased vascularity; therefore, biopsy was performed. On microscopic examination, atypia was observed in all layers of the epithelium with no interstitial infiltration, leading to a pathological diagnosis of VAIN 3. No lesion was detected on contrast magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 Sagittal T2-weighted MRI imaging of the pelvis. No lesion was identified.

Partial vaginectomy with a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) was performed under spinal anesthesia. However, it was difficult to perform the appropriate peeling operation on the right and left sides of the stump, and a lesion at the 3-o'clock position remained. The lesion was additionally peeled. The resected specimen was 5.4x3.8 cm in size. Microscopic examination demonstrated a VAIN 3 lesion measuring 3.5x2.5 cm within the specimen. Neoplastic cells were confined to the epithelium, but the surgical margin was positive. There were also neoplastic cells in the additionally resected specimen. Neither postoperative radiation therapy nor chemotherapy was planned, opting instead for careful follow-up.

Four months after the vaginectomy, a vaginal smear revealed HSIL. Vaginal biopsy was performed 1 month later on the lesion at the 8-o'clock position during colposcopy, resulting in a pathological diagnosis of VAIN 3 (Fig. 3). Eight months after the vaginectomy, CO2 laser vaporization was performed under spinal anesthesia. A small mass at the 7 o'clock position of the vaginal wall was resected using a scalpel. Microscopic examination demonstrated atypia in almost all layers of the epithelium, and the pathological diagnosis was VAIN 3 with a positive margin.

Figure 3 Vaginal biopsy revealing atypical cells of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 3. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining in a low magnification image. Scale bar, 500 µm. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining in a high magnification image. Scale bar, 100 µm.

Three months after CO2 laser excision, the vaginal smear revealed HSIL with suspected recurrence. Imiquimod treatment was then initiated by placing a sachet of 5% imiquimod cream (0.25 g) in the entire vagina three times weekly. The institutional review board approved the use of imiquimod for VAIN (SGHIRB#2019049). As imiquimod is not a standard treatment for VAIN, follow-up vaginal smear was conducted monthly after the start of imiquimod treatment to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. At 53 days and 74 days after the treatment, the vaginal smear revealed ASC-H and was negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM). A vaginal smear 1 month later further confirmed the NILM status (Table I). The treatment was continued for 14 weeks with no apparent complication. As of 3 years after the treatment, there has been no recurrence.

Table I Results of pathological examination.

Table I

Results of pathological examination.

Months post-operation	Intervention/specimen	Result
0	TAH+BSO	CIN 3, cut end negative
2	Cytology	NILM
4	Cytology	ASC-US
6	Cytology	NILM
8	Cytology	ASC-H
10	Vaginal biopsy	Atypical squamous epitheliaa
12,15,18	Cytology	ASC-H
22	Cytology	NILM
25,29,33	Cytology	ASC-H
36	Biopsy	VAIN 3
39	Partial vaginectomy by LEEP	VAIN 3, cut end positive
40	Cytology	NILM
41	Cytology	SCC
43	Cytology	HSIL
45	Vaginal biopsy	VAIN 3
47	CO2 laser vaporization, resection	VAIN 3, cut end positive
48	Cytology	NILM
48	Cytology	ASC-H
50	Cytology	HSIL
51	Administration of 5% imiquimod cream
51	Cytology	ASC-H
52-90	Cytology	NILM

[i] ^aNo abnormal mitosis was observed. ASC-H, atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL; ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TAH + BSO, total abdominal hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Discussion

Surgical treatment modalities for high-grade VAIN include partial vaginectomy, wide local excision, a LEEP, and CO2 laser vaporization. High-grade VAIN is typically treated with either excisional or ablative therapy; however, the VAIN lesions often recur, requiring repeated treatments that may cause severe damage to the tissue and vaginal scarring (3). Moreover, surgical treatments require anesthesia and can cause complications such as bleeding, infection, scarring, and injury of neighboring anatomical structures as well as high recurrence rates (4). Therefore, alternative treatments are desired.

Non-surgical treatment modalities include imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, and vaginal estrogens as well as radiotherapy (4). Imiquimod is a TLR7 agonist, which is used for the treatment of condylomas and other HPV-related neoplasias, including VAIN. Imiquimod triggers the innate immune response via TLR7-Myd88-dependent signaling by interacting with TLR7 that is expressed by myeloid dendritic cells (DCs), plasmacytoid DCs, monocytes, and macrophages. Subsequently, TLR7 activation induces the secretion of various pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon-α and interferon-γ, to in turn induce a Th1 response leading to the apoptosis of cancer cells (4,7). Imiquimod has been shown to promote histological clearance of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in clinical studies and is approved for the treatment of BCC by Food and Drug Administration (8,9). Moreover, imiquimod has been used in combination with chemotherapy to treat breast cancer patients in a phase II clinical trial (10). Several studies reported promising results with the use of imiquimod for the treatment of patients with vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (VIN), CIN, and VAIN (5,6,11-14). A meta-analysis including 94 patients with VAIN treated with 5% imiquimod showed a complete response, HPV clearance, and non-recurrence in 76.5, 52.5, and 94.3% of patients, respectively (4).

Imiquimod has emerged as a potentially useful treatment for CIN, VIN, and VAIN; however, further clinical data are required to evaluate the safety profile. Some physicians reported systemic and local adverse effects after imiquimod treatment for CIN, including headache, fever, fatigue, myalgia, vaginal discharge, vaginal bleeding, vulvar pruritus, vulvar pain, and vaginal edema (15). Wouters et al (16) reported serious adverse events in three patients who received imiquimod intravaginally for CIN: Two of the patients were hospitalized with headache, nausea, diarrhea, malaise, leukopenia, and hyponatremia, and the other patient exhibited systemic symptoms and erosion of the cornea. Although none of these adverse effects was directly proven to be caused by imiquimod, all of the symptoms disappeared after discontinuation of imiquimod. Such systemic adverse effects could be caused by the imiquimod-induced peripheral Th1 immune response (15). Tainio et al (3) reported that all 10 patients with VAIN, who received imiquimod in a randomized control study developed side effects such as flu-like symptoms, local irritation in the vagina and vulva, and lower abdominal pain. In one patient, the dosage was reduced by half, but no patient required discontinuation of the treatment. Moreover, one study concluded that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can safely be used to reduce side effects in usual type VIN (17). The same could apply to VAIN. Overall, the side effects of imiquimod are considered to be well-tolerated, and patients can be treated through outpatient management. However, clinicians prescribing this treatment should monitor patients closely for potential severe side effects.

In the present case, a patient with recurrence of VAIN after surgical treatments received imiquimod with no apparent adverse events, and the lesion ultimately disappeared. This case therefore provides further support that topical imiquimod with careful follow-up is effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of recurrent VAIN. Nevertheless, more studies should be accumulated on the clinical experience with imiquimod in patients with VAIN. In conclusion, imiquimod can be considered as one of the options for treatment of refractory VAIN.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

NS, KK and YI interpreted the case and reviewed the patient's clinical information, and drafted the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. YS and KI were responsible for the patient's treatment and management decisions. JA, KY, RG, AK, MY and YY revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. MS and KA were responsible for the pathological diagnosis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of Shizuoka General Hospital approved the use of imiquimod for VAIN (SGHIRB#2019049).

Patient consent for publication

Informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References