Open Access

Imaging findings of NTRK‑rearranged spindle cell neoplasms: A case series

  • Authors:
    • Hiroshi Kobayashi
    • Yasuyo Teramura
    • Kyoko Yamashita
    • Naohiro Makise
    • Keisuke Ae
    • Sakae Tanaka
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 23, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2610
  • Article Number: 14
  • Copyright: © Kobayashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

NTRK‑rearranged spindle cell neoplasms (NTRK‑RSCNs) are a new category of soft tissue tumors with NTRK gene fusions. The present study aimed to investigate the radiological features of NTRK‑RSCNs and their association with histopathological findings. The present study included six patients with NTRK‑RSCNs, whose fusion genes were confirmed using next‑generation sequencing. All patients underwent surgery, and their diagnosis and clinical outcomes were investigated. In addition, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of all tumors and histopathological findings of the resected specimens were assessed. The present study included three women and three men, with a mean age of 22 years (range, 2‑43 years). The NTRK gene fusions included four NTRK1 and two NTRK3 fusions. Three patients were preoperatively diagnosed with solitary fibrous tumors. One patient with NTRK3 fusion experienced local recurrence and distant metastases, whereas the other five patients had no local recurrence or metastasis. MRI revealed that all tumors were highly vascular with intra‑ and peritumoral flow voids of differing degrees. Furthermore, a partially ill‑defined border, suggesting infiltration of tumors into the surrounding tissues, particularly fat tissue, was observed in five patients, which was confirmed by histopathological findings. In conclusion, NTRK‑RSCNs are highly vascular tumors that can infiltrate the surrounding tissues. These findings suggested that NTRK‑RSCNs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of highly vascular‑rich mesenchymal tumors, including solitary fibrous tumors and alveolar soft part sarcomas. Furthermore, wide resection may be preferred to completely resect this type of tumor, considering its invasive nature.

Introduction

NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms (NTRK-RSCNs) are soft tissue tumors that harbor mainly NTRK1 or NTRK3 fusion genes, other than infantile fibrosarcoma (1). NTRK-RSCNs comprise a broad range of tumors, including morphological heterogeneity and histological grade. Histologically, NTRK-RSCNs resemble inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (2,3). Recently, lipofibromatosis-like neural tumors were described, characterized by local aggressiveness and co-expression of Pan-TRK, CD34, and S100(4), which are involved in NTRK-RSCNs in the presence of the NTRK1 fusion gene. Regarding histological grade, NTRK-RSCNs range from benign to low- and high-grade lesions (1).

The frequency of NTRK-RSCNs is reported to be 0.68% in sarcoma cases, analyzing 1915 cases at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (5). Assays commonly performed to identify NTRK fusions include Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA sequencing using targeted cancer panels, and RNA sequencing. In clinical settings, Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing are commonly used; however, these assays can miss the detection of NTRK fusions at a frequency of approximately 20% (5). These methods tend to miss the detection of NTRK3 fusions, and the specificity and staining of Pan-TRK are reported to be low and faint in sarcoma cases (5). NTRK3 fusion-positive mesenchymal tumors are more aggressive than NTRK1 fusion-positive mesenchymal tumors (2). Therefore, the clinical features and characteristics of imaging findings are important to assess NTRK-RSCNs and treat patients with advanced NTRK-RSCNs, because NTRK inhibitors have shown dramatic and durable activity against NTRK fusion-positive tumors (6).

Several histopathological studies have focused on gene fusion and prognosis, but no previous case series has reported the radiological features of NTRK-RSCNs. Therefore, the present study aimed to clarify the radiological features of NTRK-RSCNs to improve the diagnostic rate of this rare tumor and compare them with histopathological features.

Patients and methods

Patients

A retrospective review of spindle cell tumors morphologically resembling NTRK-RSCNs treated in our institutions The University of Tokyo Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) and The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (Tokyo, Japan) between January 2003 and December 2019 revealed that six patients were diagnosed with NTRK-RSCNs and had NTRK gene fusions, which was confirmed using next-generation sequencing. One case has been published previously (Case 1) (7); we have included it here to enhance our evidence of radiological and histopathological features. We examined the patients' clinical information, including patient age, sex, location of the tumor, clinical follow-up, and features of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared the histopathological features. This study was approved by the institutional review board of The University of Tokyo Hospital (approval number 11019). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or the parents of patients for all of the participants. All procedures described in this study were performed according to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2000, and the national law.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and analysis

MRI examinations were performed using 1.5-Tesla magnets from different two centers. MRI evaluations included T1-weighted fast spin-echo, short tau inversion recovery, and T2-weighted fast spin-echo images in at least two planes (usually the axial and coronal planes). All six patients were also studied using dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences.

All MRI scans were reviewed by a senior radiologist (YT) and orthopedist (HK) to assess inter-observer reproducibility. Tumor location, size, local invasion, vascularity, MRI signal intensities, and presence of necrosis, fatty or fibroblastic component (defined as low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted image and possible subtle enhancement by gadolinium administration), and peritumoral edema were noted. When there was disagreement between observers, they re-evaluated and discussed the images to determine the existence of each characteristic. Tumor growth patterns were classified into three types, as previously reported (8) pushing type, entirely well-defined tumor; focal type, tumor with irregular borders and infiltration of surrounding tissues representing <25% of tumor circumference; and diffuse type, tumor with irregular borders and infiltration of surrounding tissues representing 25% of tumor circumference.

Histopathological analysis

Surgical specimens stained with hematoxylin and eosin were retrospectively reviewed by expert pathologists. Mitotic count/10 high-power fields, cellularity, presence of necrosis, infiltration into surrounding tissues, and surgical margin were evaluated. Surgical margins were classified into three categories-R0, microscopically negative margin; R1, macroscopically complete with positive microscopic margin; and R2, macroscopically incomplete margin. Immunohistochemistry of CD34, S100, and MIB1 was also analyzed.

Results

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics are presented in Table I. This study included three women and three men, with a mean age of 22 (range, 2-43) years. The tumors were in the knee (n=3), lower leg (n=1), buttock (n=1), and perineum (n=1). One patient (Case 5) had a recurrent tumor after treatment at another hospital, and the other five patients had primary tumors. One patient was diagnosed with NTRK-RSCN because the patient was treated in 2019, and the entity of NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal tumors was suggested. However, three patients were diagnosed with SFTs, one patient had dedifferentiated liposarcoma because of the positivity of MDM2 immunohistochemical staining and fatty component, and one patient had sarcoma with intermediate malignancy. Four and two tumors harbored NTRK1 and NTRK3 fusions, respectively. All patients underwent surgery, and no recurrence was observed, except in one patient. Five patients were disease free or had no evidence of disease, and one patient with recurrence and distant metastasis (Case 3) was treated with chemotherapy; however, the patient did not survive.

Table I

Patients' clinical characteristics, fusion gene and prognosis.

Table I

Patients' clinical characteristics, fusion gene and prognosis.

CaseAge, yearsSexLocation of primary tumorDiagnosis by resected tumorFusion geneTreatmentFollow- up duration, monthsPrognosis
123FLower legNTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasmLMNA-NTRK1Surgery16CDF
22MKneeSarcoma, intermediate malignancyTPM3-NTRK1Surgery125CDF
316FButtockSFT, grade 3YWHAE-NTRK3Surgery, chemotherapy39DOD
413MKneeSFT, grade 1TPR-NTRK1Surgery146CDF
543FKneeSFT, grade 2PPFIBP-NTRK3Surgery125NED
635MPerinealDedifferentiated liposarcoma, grade 2LMNA-NTRK1Surgery31CDF

[i] F, female; M, male; SFT, solitary fibrous tumor; CDF, complete disease free; DOD, dead of disease; NED, no evidence of disease.

MRI findings

The imaging characteristics, including the location, size, and properties of the tumors, are summarized in Tables II and III. Four tumors were located in the deep area, and two were located in the subcutaneous tissue. The mean diameter was 9.4 (range, 4-11.3) cm. These tumors were isointense or slightly high in intensity compared to the skeletal muscle on T1-weighted images and high intensity on T2-weighted images. All tumors were intensely enhanced by gadolinium (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5), and peritumoral enhancement was observed in two patients. Regarding intratumoral features, one tumor had a fatty component (Fig. 5), two fibrotic component, three central necrosis (Fig. 4), and one lobular architecture.

Table II

Imaging findings of the tumor.

Table II

Imaging findings of the tumor.

CaseDepthMaximal diameter, cmT1T2Degree of contrast enhancementPattern of enhancementPeritumoral enhancementFatty componentFibroblastic componentCentral necrosisLobular architecture
1Deep11HighHighIntenseHomogeneousYesNoYesNoNo
2Deep11.3IsoHighIntenseHeterogeneousNoNoNoYesYes
3Deep8.6IsoHighIntenseHeterogeneousNoNoNoYesNo
4Deep4IsoHighIntenseHomogeneousYesNoYesNoNo
5Superficial11IsoHighIntenseHeterogeneousNoNoNoYesNo
6Superficial10.5IsoHighIntenseHomogeneousNoYesNoNoNo

Table III

Imaging findings of the tumor growth pattern and flow-voids.

Table III

Imaging findings of the tumor growth pattern and flow-voids.

CaseGrowth patternEdemaInfiltration into fatty tissueTail signDistribution of flow-voidsNumber of flow-voidsMaximal diameter of flow-void, mm
1Focal-typeLimitedYesNoIntra and peripheral≥58
2Diffuse-typeLimitedYesNoIntra and peripheral≥54
3Pushing-typeAbsentNoNoPeripheral≤51.5
4Focal-typeAbsentYesYesNoneNANA
5Focal-typeLimitedYesNoPeripheral≤51
6Focal-typeAbsentYesNoIntra and peripheral≥54

The growth pattern of these tumors was focally and globally infiltrative in five patients, especially infiltration into the surrounding fat tissue (Figs. 1, 3, 4 and 5), and one tumor had distinct tumor margin (Fig. 2). Five tumors had flow voids (Figs. 1, 2 and 5)-three cases at the intra- and peripheries (Figs. 1 and 5) and two cases at the periphery (Fig. 2). Three tumors had more than five flow voids, and these tumors had a relatively large diameter of the flow voids.

Histopathology and correlation with imaging characteristics

Representative histopathological findings and surgical margin are presented in Tables IV and V. Five patients were both CD34 and S100 positive, and one patient was CD34 positive. Mitotic counts equal to or greater than 10 were observed in two patients, whereas others had few mitoses. Cellularity was high in all four patients. In all patients, invasion of the surrounding tissues was observed, especially in fat tissue compatible with MRI findings. Invasion into the surrounding tissues from the main nodule was also observed in histological evaluation (Figs. 1, 3, 4 and 5). Local recurrence was observed in one patient (Case 3) after R1 resection, and no local recurrence was observed with marginal or wide margin resection. Vascular invasion was observed in one patient (Case 3) with distant metastasis.

Table IV

Histopathological findings.

Table IV

Histopathological findings.

CaseMitosisCellularityNecrosisInfiltration into fat tissueVascular invasion
10-1HighNo+-
210HighNo+-
310-15High<50%++
40-2 Intermediate-highNo+-
55-10Intermediate<50%+-
60-5HighNo+-

Table V

Surgical margin.

Table V

Surgical margin.

CaseIntended surgical marginInvasion from the main noduleMicroscopic surgical margin
1WideFat tissue, muscleR0
2WideFat tissueR1
3MarginalFat tissue, muscle, intermuscular fat tissueR1
4WideFat tissueR0
5WideFat tissueR0
6WideFat tissue, muscle, intermuscular fat tissueR0

Discussion

NTRK-RSCNs are extremely rare tumors, and identification of these tumors is important because NTRK inhibitors are highly effective and durable (6). NTRK-RSCNs include various fusion types, and their histological features and grades vary (1). According to a recent report, DNA-sequencing target panel and Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry, commonly available methods, could overlook these tumors (5); therefore, it is important to understand the clinical features of these tumors. There are only two case reports describing the imaging characteristics of these tumors (7,9). In this study, we characterized the MRI appearance of NTRK-RSCNs, which suggested that NTRK-RSCNs could be one of the differential diagnoses of highly vascular-rich mesenchymal tumors, such as SFT and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS). Furthermore, we observed that NTRK-RSCNs can infiltrate the surrounding tissues, especially fat tissues, by comparing imaging characteristics and histopathological features. These findings could help surgeons plan the extent of resection of these tumors.

Imaging features of NTRK-RSCNs have been mentioned so far in only two case reports (7,9). This case series of six patients with NTRK-RSCNs reveals that these tumors have a highly vascular nature, presence of intra- or peritumoral vessels is characteristic feature of these tumors, and the findings are compatible with that of a previous case report (7,9). The number of flow voids and the diameter of flow-void vessels were different in each patient, and five out of the six patients showed intra- or peritumoral flow voids. As for other mesenchymal tumors with a highly vascular nature, SFTs and ASPS have been reported. McCarville et al reported that ASPS imaged with MRI in 19 patients had flow voids in all patients and that 95% (18/19 patients) of patients had both intra- and peripheral flow voids (10). Compared to the results of this report, NTRK-RSCNs could be less vascular than ASPS, although they tend to be highly vascular tumors. Crombé et al reported that ASPS had eight characteristic imaging features-deep location, high signal intensities on T1-weighted imaging, central area of necrosis, absence of fibrotic component, infiltrative growth pattern, absence of tail sign, presence of intra- and peritumoral flow voids, and number of flow voids ≥5. Moreover, 80% of ASPS pose at least seven out of the eight features (11). In our patients, the scores for these eight characteristics were 6, 7, 4, 3, 5, and 6 points in Cases 1-6, respectively. These results indicate that NTRK-RSCNs resemble ASPS in terms of highly vascular tumors, but NTRK-RSCNs tend to be less vascular than ASPS and have different imaging characteristics. SFT is an important differential diagnosis for NTRK-RSCNs because it shows monotonous spindle cell tumors and vascular-rich lesions with a hemangiopericytomatous appearance, which is also observed in NTRK-RSCNs (12). In our cases, three patients were first diagnosed with SFTs. Garcia-Bennett et al reported imaging findings of SFTs in nine patients and revealed that the common findings were well-defined polylobulated masses and the presence of vascular pedicles. However, invasion into adjacent structures was reported to be only 22% (13), and other reports of imaging findings of SFTs demonstrated that the ratio was 9% (14). In contrast, NTRK-RSCNs in our cases showed infiltration into the adjacent tissues on MRI, and infiltration into the surrounding tissues was confirmed by histopathological analysis. The finding of infiltration into adjacent tissues was consistent with previous reports (2,4,15). This infiltrative feature can be a differential point of imaging between SFTs and NTRK-RSCNs. SFT is histologically diagnosed using its specific molecular marker, STAT6, because of the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene (16). In cases where imaging findings show a highly vascular mass and histological findings show spindle cell tumor without STAT6 immunostaining, the screening of NTRK gene fusion, including Pan-TRK, fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA-sequencing targeted panel, and RNA sequencing, should be considered to discover NTRK-RSCNs. Recently, spindle cell tumors with CD34 or S100 immunostaining positive could pose other RTK-related fusions, including ALK, BRAF, ROS1, and RET (14,17). It is unknown whether these tumors are vascular-rich lesions; therefore, further investigation should be performed.

We recognized the clinically important feature, that is, focal infiltration of the tumor into adjacent structures, in imaging and histopathological findings, which was recently observed in previous case reports (7,9). In five of the six patients, infiltration into fatty tissue was observed on MRI, which was confirmed by histological findings. In Case 3, histological infiltration of the surrounding tissue, including fat tissue, intermuscular fat, and muscle, was observed despite imaging findings with the pushing type and no invasive pattern into fat tissue. This patient had metastasis after surgery, with relatively higher mitosis compared with other patients, and vascular invasion was observed histologically. Although it is difficult to conclude from our findings, due to limited cases, that imaging findings could not predict the malignant potential of this tumor, NTRK-RSCNs could have malignant potential although the imaging findings were well circumscribed. Furthermore, histological findings with high mitotic count should be considered a sign of malignant potential of this tumor, as described by previous reports (2,17), and vascular invasion should be carefully investigated, which could be a poor prognostic factor, similar to other soft tissue sarcomas (18). Intended wide resection with negative histological margins resulted in no recurrence in four patients, although one patient with a marginal margin had no recurrence. Considering the infiltrative nature of this tumor, wide resection is recommended. Effective chemotherapeutic NTRK inhibitors, including entrectinib and larotrectinib, are usually used in advanced cases, whereas the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant larotrectinib treatment have been reported in the management of children with locally advanced TRK fusion sarcomas (19). To reduce the loss of function after extended tumor resection, neoadjuvant treatment with NTRK inhibitors for NTRK-RSCNs is promising, and further analysis is required.

The present study has some limitations. The has a retrospective design and analyzed a small number of patients. The entity of NTRK-RSCNs includes a broad range of histological features and grades, and local aggressiveness and metastatic potential differ depending on the tumor. However, our imaging findings of highly vascular tumors might be a common feature of this tumor driven by the same driver NTRK gene fusions. Despite these limitations, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting the MRI findings of NTRK-RSCN lesions in soft tissues.

In conclusion, this study mainly presented two important imaging findings of NTRK-RSCNs-high vascularity and focal invasiveness into the surrounding tissues, especially fat tissue. NTRK-RSCNs could be candidates for the differential diagnosis of highly vascular mesenchymal tumors, including SFT and ASPS. Furthermore, the focal invasiveness of the tumor shown by MRI was confirmed by histopathological analysis, and NTRK-RSCNs could be resected with wide margin to avoid local recurrence. These findings provide useful information for the diagnosis and treatment of NTRK-RSCNs and would aid in improving the detection and curative rates of these tumors.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author's contributions

HK wrote the paper and performed the literature review. HK and KA confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. HK, YT, KA, KY, NM and ST contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board of The University of Tokyo Hospital (approval no. 11019). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or the parents of patients for all individual participants included in the study at The University of Tokyo Hospital and The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours: WHO Classification of Tumors. 5th edition. IARC Press, Lyon, pp403-409, 2020.

2 

Suurmeijer AJ, Dickson BC, Swanson D, Zhang L, Sung YS, Huang HY, Fletcher CD and Antonescu CR: The histologic spectrum of soft tissue spindle cell tumors with NTRK3 gene rearrangements. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 58:739–746. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Baranov E and Hornick JL: Soft tissue special issue: Fibroblastic and myofibroblastic neoplasms of the head and neck. Head Neck Pathol. 14:43–58. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Agaram NP, Zhang L, Sung YS, Chen CL, Chung CT, Antonescu CR and Fletcher CD: Recurrent NTRK1 gene fusions define a novel subset of locally aggressive lipofibromatosis-like neural tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 40:1407–1416. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Solomon JP, Linkov I, Rosado A, Mullaney K, Rosen EY, Frosina D, Jungbluth AA, Zehir A, Benayed R, Drilon A, et al: NTRK fusion detection across multiple assays and 33,997 cases: Diagnostic implications and pitfalls. Mod Pathol. 33:38–46. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Cocco E, Scaltriti M and Drilon A: NTRK fusion-positive cancers and TRK inhibitor therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 15:731–747. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Nakamura T, Matsumine A, Matsubara T, Asanuma K, Yada Y, Hagi T and Sudo A: Infiltrative tumor growth patterns on magnetic resonance imaging associated with systemic inflammation and oncological outcome in patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. PLoS One. 12(e0181787)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Takamiya A, Ishibashi Y, Makise N, Hirata M, Ushiku T, Tanaka S and Kobayashi H: Imaging characteristics of NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm of the soft tissue: A case report. J Orthop Sci. S0949-2658(00367-5)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (Epub ahead of print).

9 

Overfield CJ, Edgar MA, Wessell DE, Wilke BK and Garner HW: NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm of the lower extremity: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 51:1707–1713. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

McCarville MB, Muzzafar S, Kao SC, Coffin CM, Parham DM, Anderson JR and Spunt SL: Imaging features of alveolar soft-part sarcoma: A report from children's oncology group study ARST0332. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 203:1345–1352. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Crombé A, Brisse HJ, Ledoux P, Haddag-Miliani L, Bouhamama A, Taieb S, Le Loarer F and Kind M: Alveolar soft-part sarcoma: Can MRI help discriminating from other soft-tissue tumors? A study of the French Sarcoma Group. Eur Radiol. 29:3170–3182. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Haller F, Knopf J, Ackermann A, Bieg M, Kleinheinz K, Schlesner M, Moskalev EA, Will R, Satir AA, Abdelmagid IE, et al: Paediatric and adult soft tissue sarcomas with NTRK1 gene fusions: A subset of spindle cell sarcomas unified by a prominent myopericytic/haemangiopericytic pattern. J Pathol. 238:700–710. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Garcia-Bennett J, Olivé CS, Rivas A, Domínguez-Oronoz R and Huguet P: Soft tissue solitary fibrous tumor. Imaging findings in a series of nine cases. Skelet Radiol. 41:1427–1433. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Wignall OJ, Moskovic EC, Thway K and Thomas JM: Solitary fibrous tumors of the soft tissues: Review of the imaging and clinical features with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195:W55–W62. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Kao YC, Suurmeijer AJH, Argani P, Dickson BC, Zhang L, Sung YS, Agaram NP, Fletcher CDM and Antonescu CR: Soft tissue tumors characterized by a wide spectrum of kinase fusions share a lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor pattern. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 59:575–583. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Doyle LA, Vivero M, Fletcher CD, Mertens F and Hornick JL: Nuclear expression of STAT6 distinguishes solitary fibrous tumor from histologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 27:390–395. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Suurmeijer AJH, Dickson BC, Swanson D, Zhang L, Sung YS, Cotzia P, Fletcher CDM and Antonescu CR: A novel group of spindle cell tumors defined by S100 and CD34 co-expression shows recurrent fusions involving RAF1, BRAF, and NTRK1/2 genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 57:611–621. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Gustafson P, Akerman M, Alvegård TA, Coindre JM, Fletcher CD, Rydholm A and Willén H: Prognostic information in soft tissue sarcoma using tumour size, vascular invasion and microscopic tumour necrosis-the SIN-system. Eur J Cancer. 39:1568–1576. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

DuBois SG, Laetsch TW, Federman N, Turpin BK, Albert CM, Nagasubramanian R, Anderson ME, Davis JL, Qamoos HE, Reynolds ME, et al: The use of neoadjuvant larotrectinib in the management of children with locally advanced TRK fusion sarcomas. Cancer. 124:4241–4247. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2023
Volume 18 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kobayashi H, Teramura Y, Yamashita K, Makise N, Ae K and Tanaka S: Imaging findings of NTRK‑rearranged spindle cell neoplasms: A case series. Mol Clin Oncol 18: 14, 2023
APA
Kobayashi, H., Teramura, Y., Yamashita, K., Makise, N., Ae, K., & Tanaka, S. (2023). Imaging findings of NTRK‑rearranged spindle cell neoplasms: A case series. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 18, 14. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2610
MLA
Kobayashi, H., Teramura, Y., Yamashita, K., Makise, N., Ae, K., Tanaka, S."Imaging findings of NTRK‑rearranged spindle cell neoplasms: A case series". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 18.3 (2023): 14.
Chicago
Kobayashi, H., Teramura, Y., Yamashita, K., Makise, N., Ae, K., Tanaka, S."Imaging findings of NTRK‑rearranged spindle cell neoplasms: A case series". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 18, no. 3 (2023): 14. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2610