Open Access

Treating radiation‑related nasopharyngeal necrosis with endostar in patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A report of two cases and a literature review

  • Authors:
    • Jie Tang
    • Xiu-Wen Li
    • Yong Wu
    • Zhen Su
    • Yan He
    • Xue-Wen Sun
    • Xiao-Long Cao
    • Yi-Hua Li
    • Bi-Cheng Wang
    • Guo-Rong Zou
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 13, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2653
  • Article Number: 57
  • Copyright: © Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Radiation‑related nasopharyngeal necrosis (RRNN) is a rare and often fatal complication in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Currently, no standard treatments are recommended for RRNN. The effects of traditional conservative treatments are suboptimal, and surgery for RRNN cannot be performed by inexperienced doctors. In the present study, the use of Endostar in two patients with RRNN was evaluated. Two patients with RRNN were treated at the Department of Oncology, Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China). Endostar was administrated (15 mg/day from day 1 to day 7, every three weeks) intravenously for four and seven cycles in a male and a female patient, respectively. The effects of Endostar were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a nasopharyngoscope. The symptoms of RRNN in both patients were relieved after treatment with Endostar. MRI and nasopharyngoscope analysis revealed that necrosis of the nasopharynx was substantially decreased and nasopharyngeal ulcers were healed. Endostar has the potential to be a novel, effective therapy for the treatment of patients with RRNN. However, clinical trials are required to confirm the results of the present study.

Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is common in Southeast Asia and is less common in Europe and the United States. The incidence of NPC in endemic areas can reach 10-50 per 100,000 individuals (1). With the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate and overall survival rate are approximately 90 and 80%, respectively (2,3). However, the extension of survival time leads to the occurrence of late adverse effects (AEs) of radiotherapy, which are associated with poor quality of life in patients with NPC. The most common AEs in patients with NPC treated with radiotherapy include hearing loss, tinnitus, subcutaneous fibrosis, and xerostomia (4). Radiation-related nasopharyngeal necrosis (RRNN) is a rare AE of radiotherapy, with an incidence of 1-2% in patients with primary NPC (5,6). However, in patients with recurrent NPC treated with reirradiation, the incidence of RRNN is 30-40% (7,8). Predominant symptoms caused by RRNN include foul nasal odor, persistent headache, and nasal hemorrhage. Most patients with RRNN succumb, as a result of massive nasopharyngeal bleeding due to internal carotid artery rupture (9).

There are currently no effective treatments for RRNN due to a lack of knowledge surrounding its pathophysiology. Conservative management includes nasal irrigation, systemic or topical antibiotics, intravenous nutritional supplements, hyperbaric oxygen, and debridement guided by nasal endoscopy; however, outcomes with these treatments remain suboptimal (9). Endoscopic or open surgery have also been suggested to remove necrotic tissue, followed by flap covering; however, these approaches are associated with high costs and can only be performed by few skilled surgeons in China (10-12). As such, there is a need to identify effective, low cost therapies that can effectively treat RRNN in patients with NPC.

Endostar, as a recombinant form of endostatin, exerts antitumor effects via inhibition of the VEGF pathway, similar to bevacizumab (13-16). Endostar, in combination with chemotherapy, was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration as first-line therapy for stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (16). In addition to its anti-angiogenic effect, Endostar was also demonstrated to reduce radiation damage to normal tissues. Guan et al revealed that Endostar decreased the occruence of RRNN in patients with local recurrent NPC who were treated with radiotherapy (17). Xing et al also successfully treated patients with radiotherapy-induced brain necrosis, with Endostar (18). In addition, a pre-clinical study revealed that Endostar could reduce radiation-induced fibrosis (19).

Based on these studies, two patients with RRNN were treated with Endostar to determine its effectiveness. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of an anti-angiogenic approach for the treatment of RRNN.

Case report

The present study was approved (approval no. PYRC2023090) by the Ethics Committee of Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China). The patients agreed to participate in the present study and submitted written informed consent.

The first patient (case 1), was a 50-year-old man who in June 2019 presented to the Outpatient Department of Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China), with a headache and was diagnosed with undifferentiated non-keratinizing carcinoma of the nasopharynx [World Health Organization (WHO) type III], tumor stage III (T3N1M0) according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (20,21). From June 26, 2019, the patient received two cycles of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with IMRT, administered according to the following dosing schedule: Gross tumor volume (GTV), high risk area around primary tumor (CTV1), low risk area around tumor and bilateral cervical lymph node drainage area (CTV2), left positive lymph node and right positive lymph node were dosed with 70.4, 60, 54, 66 and 64 Gy, respectively. The fractionation number was 32. A complete response was revealed using MRI and a nasopharyngoscope on September 10, 2019. On July 3, 2020, the patient again presented to the hospital due to a refractory, severe headache. A nasopharyngoscope revealed a yellowish necrotic tissue on the left parietal-posterior wall of the nasopharynx, surrounded by purulent secretions (Fig. 1A). MRI revealed necrotic lesions on the left side of the nasopharynx (Fig. 1B). No tumor metastases were detected by contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen. The patient was negative for Epstein-Barr virus. Repetitive histological examination (10% formalin-fixed for 12 h at room temperature; embedded in paraffin; section thickness, 3 µm; staining, hematoxylin and eosin stain used for 15 min at room temperature; and visualized using a light microscope with a magnification of x100) of nasopharyngeal specimens showed no recurrent tumor (Fig. 1C). Initially, conservative treatments including nasal irrigations, systemic antibiotics and intravenous nutrition were used to treat the patient. However, the headache of the patient worsened one week later. The decision was made to use Endostar following approval (approval no. PYRC2023090) by the Ethics Committee of Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China). The headache of the patient was significantly relieved after one course of Endostar (15 mg per day, from day 1 to day 7, every three weeks), and oxycodone was not required for pain relief after four courses of treatment. MRI and a nasopharyngoscope revealed that the necrotic lesion had disappeared after two cycles of Endostar (Figs. 2 and 3). Due to financial constraints, the patient declined to return for examination and treatment after four cycles of Endostar. However, on August 20, 2022, the patient was revealed to be doing well without any discomfort such as headache, nasal odor, or nasal hemorrhage, upon examination at the Outpatient Department.

The second patient (case 2), was a 50-year-old woman who in November 2019 was diagnosed with undifferentiated non-keratinizing carcinoma of the nasopharynx (WHO type III), tumor stage IVA (T4N1M0) at Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China) according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The patient received three cycles of chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and sintilimab, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy as part of a randomized controlled trial for patients with local advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. IMRT was administered at 70, 60, 54, 66 and 64 Gy for the GTV, CTV1, CTV2, left positive lymph node and right positive lymph node, respectively. The fractionation number was 33. A total of six additional cycles of immunotherapy with sintilimab were administered after chemoradiotherapy and the last dose of sintilimab was administered on September 9, 2020. The patient was admitted to the Department of Oncology, Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China) on September 23, 2020 due to foul nasal odor and hearing loss. A nasopharyngoscope revealed a large amount of necrotic tissue and bone on the posterior wall of the nasopharynx (Fig. 4A). An endotoscope revealed bilateral middle ear effusion. MRI revealed osteonecrosis of the skull base and necrosis of the posterior wall of the nasopharyngx (Fig. 4B). No distant metastases were identified by CT scan of the chest and abdomen. The patient was negative for Epstein-Barr virus. Due to insufficient exposure of the nasopharynx with the use of the nasopharyngoscope, as well as severe necrosis and adhesion, a forceps biopsy was not permitted as there was a possibility of massive nasopharyngeal hemorrhage. The patient was eventually diagnosed with RRNN based on the results of MRI and the nasopharyngoscope and was treated with Endostar following approval (approval no. PYRC2023090) by the Ethics Committee of Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China). The patient received bilateral middle ear tube drainage and seven cycles of Endostar (15 mg per day, from day 1 to day 7, every three weeks) between September 30, 2020 and February 23, 2021. The symptoms of the patient were relieved after two courses of Endostar. The nasopharyngoscope and MRI showed that the nasopharyngeal necrotic lesions had disappeared and the nasopharyngx was filled with new tissue (Figs. 5 and 6). Pathological biopsy (10% formalin-fixed for 12 h at room temperature; embedded in paraffin; section thickness, 3 µm; staining, hematoxylin and eosin stain used for 15 min at room temperature; and visualized using a light microscope with a magnification of x100) of the posterior wall of the nasopharynx revealed that there was no tumor recurrence (Fig. 7).

Discussion

RRNN is defined as necrosis of the nasopharyngeal mucosa, adjacent muscles, or the skull base following exposure to high doses of radiation in patients with NPC (22). Reirradiation is the most important risk factor for the development of RRNN. Other risk factors include tumor stage, nutritional status during radiotherapy, and anemia (5). Patients with RRNN often present with headache, foul nasal odor, and recurrent epistaxis, which may occur alone or together (6,9,23). RRNN can significantly reduce the quality of life of the patient and is associated with mortality. The reported 2-year overall survival (OS) in patients with RRNN is 51.6% (11). In patients in whom necrosis or ulcers have eroded the skull base bone, survival rates are even worse (9). The diagnosis of RRNN can be achieved via a nasopharyngoscope and MRI of the nasopharynx; however, the gold standard of diagnosis is a pathological biopsy (11).

RRNN is challenging for physicians to treat. The mainstays of treatment include conservative and surgical management. The conservative approach consists of daily rinsing of the nasopharynx with 2% aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution or saline, hyperbaric oxygen, systemic antibiotics, intravenous nutrition and surgical debridement, which is associated with a cure rate of only 13.4% (9). In addition, a combination of pentoxifylline, tocopherol, and clodronate, or PENTOCLO, was revealed to be effective for treating refractory osteoradionecrosis, which is a serious complication of RRNN (24,25). However, a study by Huang et al (12) revealed that only 9.5% of patients with mucosal defects caused by RRNN could be effectively treated with PENTOCLO, which is lower than the 59% cure rate reported by Robard et al (25). Surgical management, including complete resection of necrotic nasopharyngeal tissue under endoscopy, and maxillary swing or mandibulotomy with free vastus lateralis flap for reconstruction, may be effective methods for the treatment of RRNN (11,12). However, surgery is a complex and risky procedure that can only be performed by specific experts. Additionally, only 32% of patients with osteoradionecrosis were eligible for surgery in a study by Chen et al (11).

In the present study, the successful treatment of two patients with RRNN using the anti-angiogenic drug, Endostar was reported. As of October 8, 2022, neither patient reported headache, nasal odor, nasal bleeding or other symptoms and both patients did not require analgesic drugs.

The main mechanism underlying the development of RRNN is radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) (26). This process can be divided into three phases; phase I involves the injury of endothelial cells by radiation leading to the generation of chemotactic cytokines that can trigger acute, non-specific inflammation. This inflammation is characterized by increased vascular permeability, local edema formation and local ischaemia. This process is very similar to the changes observed in the vasculature of the blood-spinal cord barrier following radiotherapy, which may be due to upregulation of VEGF expression induced by radiotherapy. Phase II is characterized by the activation of fibroblasts by cytokines that seep into tissue from the micro vasculature and become myofibroblasts, leading to the formation of RIF tissue in place of normal tissue. Among these cytokines, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) plays a predominant role. Finally, phase III involves the death of myofibroblasts in RIF tissue, which leads the tissue to become poorly vascularized, paucicellular, and unable to heal once it is subjected to trauma and is therefore prone to necrosis (26,27).

Endostatin was shown to exert antitumor effects by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis in xenografted mouse models (28-31). Endostar is a recombinant form of endostatin, which was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration in combination with vinorelbine and cisplatin, for the treatment of NSCLC in 2005(16). However, a phase II study showed that Endostar alone did not cause tumor regression in highly vascular neuroendocrine tumors (32). These results indicate that the antitumor activity of Endostar is more complex than previously considered. Another study in a xenografted mouse model of human NPC demonstrated that Endostar can restore normal vasculature. The tumor vasculature had fewer sprouts and branches in the Endostar group compared with controls. In addition, Endostar significantly increased the pericyte coverage, and the percentage of basement membrane in the blood vessels. By contrast, Endostar decreased the permeability of the tumor vasculature and improved hypoxia in tumor tissue compared with controls in a xenografted mouse model of human NPC (P<0.05). These effects are attributable to the antiangiogenic activity of Endostar (33). Wang et al demonstrated that Endostar could significantly increase the blood volume and blood flow velocity in the tumors of patients with NPC (34). Thus, Endostar may treat RRNN by downregulating the VEGF pathway, leading to decreased vascular permeability in irradiated tissue. Additionally, Endostar may also downregulate TGF-β1 to treat RRNN (19).

Guan et al demonstrated that treatment with Endostar decreased the incidence of RRNN in patients with recurrent NPC who received radiotherapy (17). In the present study, the effect of Endostar in the treatment of RRNN was investigated. In case 1, T1-enhanced imaging showed that the signal intensity of the skull base bone significantly decreased after treatment. This may be due to reduced vascular permeability following treatment with Endostar. In both cases, new tissue was observed in the nasopharynx, which presented with a high signal in T1-enhanced images. Pathological biopsy from the posterior wall of the nasopharynx in case 2 revealed that the tissue was full of squamous cells, which is in contrast to RIF tissue decribed in a previous study (26).

Endostar is generally dosed at 7.5 mg/m2/day for 14 consecutive days (13,16). However, clinical trials have evaluated different doses, including 15 mg/day for 14 days or 45 mg/day on days 1, 3, and 4 (35,36). In the present study, a treatment regimen of 15 mg daily for 7 days was evaluated. Total therapeutic dosage was determined based on the response of each patient to treatment. After each cycle of treatment, the patient was evaluated for symptoms, and underwent a nasopharyngoscope examination and MRI every two cycles. If the following criteria were met, treatment was discontinued: Resolution or significant improvement of symptoms; signs of ulcer repair with the use of the nasopharyngoscope; no infectious secretions in the nasopharynx; resolution of necrotic lesions observed with MRI. However, given the limited clinical experience of the authors, further studies are required to explore the optimal total dosage.

Previous clinical research has reported several AEs associated with Endostar including arrhythmia, prolonged or shortened Q-T interval, hematological adverse reactions such as anemia and prolonged thrombin time, and digestive adverse reactions such as transaminase elevation (37). In the present study, no Endostar-related AEs were observed. Morevover, previous pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the maximum total dose of Endostar in humans can reach 240 mg/m2/day for 168 days (38), which demonstrates the favorable safety profile of Endostar.

In conclusion, in the present study it was revealed that two patients with RRNN were cured with Endostar, suggesting that it may be a promising treatment for this intractable disease. However, large-scale, prospective, controlled trials are required to confirm the effectiveness of Endostar for the treatment of RRNN.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by the General Medical and Health Projects of Science and Technology Bureau of Panyu District (grant no. 2022-Z04-048 to JT), the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 2020CFB397 to BCW), and the Independent Innovation Foundation of Wuhan Union Hospital (grant no. 2019-109 to BCW).

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are included in the figures of this article.

Authors' contributions

JT, XWL and YW contributed to the design of the study. YHL, ZS and XLC contributed to the conception of the study. JT, XWL, GRZ, YHL, ZS, and XLC performed the extraction of images. JT, BCW, XWS, YH and XWL performed the analysis of the images. JT and BCW wrote the manuscript. GRZ, YW and JT edited the manuscript. JT and BCW confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved (approval no. PYRC2023090) by the Ethics Committee of Panyu Central Hospital (Guangzhou, China). The patients agreed to participate in the present study and submitted written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

The patients provided consent for their information to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Luo J, Chia KS, Chia SE, Reilly M, Tan CS and Ye W: Secular trends of nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence in Singapore, Hong Kong and Los Angeles Chinese populations, 1973-1997. Eur J Epidemiol. 22:513–521. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Xu M, Zang J, Luo S, Wang J and Li X: Long-term survival outcomes and adverse effects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT in a non-endemic region: A population-based retrospective study. BMJ Open. 11(e045417)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Zhang MX, Li J, Shen GP, Zou X, Xu JJ, Jiang R, You R, Hua YJ, Sun Y, Ma J, et al: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 51:2587–2595. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Zeng L, Tian YM, Sun XM, Chen CY, Han F, Xiao WW, Deng XW and Lu TX: Late toxicities after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Patient and treatment-related risk factors. Br J Cancer. 110:49–54. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Li XY, Sun XS, Liu SL, Chen QY, Guo SS, Liu LT, Yan JJ, Xie HJ, Tang QN, Liang YJ, et al: The development of a nomogram to predict post-radiation necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A large-scale cohort study. Cancer Manag Res. 11:6253–6263. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Han P, Wang X, Liang F, Liu Y, Qiu X, Xu Y, Chen R, Yu S and Huang X: Osteoradionecrosis of the Skull base in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Incidence and risk factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 102:552–555. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Kong F, Zhou J, Du C, He X, Kong L, Hu C and Ying H: Long-term survival and late complications of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 18(1139)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Han F, Zhao C, Huang SM, Lu LX, Huang Y, Deng XW, Mai WY, The BS, Butler EB and Lu TX: Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of re-irradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 24:569–576. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Chen MY, Mai HQ, Sun R, Guo X, Zhao C, Hong MH and Hua YJ: Clinical findings and imaging features of 67 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis. Chin J Cancer. 32:533–538. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Huang XM, Zheng YQ, Zhang XM, Mai HQ, Zeng L, Liu X, Liu W, Zou H and Xu G: Diagnosis and management of skull base osteoradionecrosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 116:1626–1631. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Yang Q, Zou X, You R, Liu YP, Han Y, Zhang YN, Guo L, Mai HQ, Xie CM, Li L, et al: Proposal for a new risk classification system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis. Oral Oncol. 67:83–88. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Huang WB, Wong STS and Chan JYW: Role of surgery in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis and its complications after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 40:369–376. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Chen J, Yao Q, Huang M, Wang B, Zhang J, Wang T, Ming Y, Zhou X, Jia Q, Huan Y, et al: A randomized Phase III trial of neoadjuvant recombinant human endostatin, docetaxel and epirubicin as first-line therapy for patients with breast cancer (CBCRT01). Int J Cancer. 142:2130–2138. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Bao Y, Peng F, Zhou QC, Yu ZH, Li JC, Cheng ZB, Chen L, Hu X, Chen YY, Wang J, et al: Phase II trial of recombinant human endostatin in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 114:161–166. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Han BH, Xiu QY, Wang HM, Shen J, Gu AQ, Luo Y, Bai CX, Guo SL, Liu WC, Zhuang ZX, et al: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety study to evaluate the clinical effects and quality of life of paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) alone or combined with endostar for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 33:854–859. 2011.PubMed/NCBI(In Chinese).

16 

Wang J, Sun Y, Liu Y, Yu Q, Zhang Y, Li K, Zhu Y, Zhou Q, Hou M, Guan Z, et al: (Results of randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase III trial of rh-endostatin (YH-16) in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients). Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 8:283–290. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

17 

Guan Y, Li A, Xiao W, Liu S, Chen B, Lu T, Zhao C and Han F: The efficacy and safety of Endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced, locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 6:33926–33934. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Xing S, Fan Z, Shi L, Yang Z and Bai Y: Successful treatment of brain radiation necrosis resulting from triple-negative breast cancer with Endostar and short-term hyperbaric oxygen therapy: A case report. Onco Targets Ther. 12:2729–2735. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Zhang K, Yang S, Zhu Y, Mo A, Zhang D and Liu L: Protection against acute radiation-induced lung injury: A novel role for the anti-angiogenic agent Endostar. Mol Med Rep. 6:309–315. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

He T, Yan RN, Chen HY, Zeng YY, Xiang ZZ, Liu F, Shao BF, Ma JC, Wang XR and Liu L: Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the IMRT era. BMC Cancer. 21(327)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Pan JJ, Ng WT, Zong JF, Chan LL, O'Sullivan B, Lin SJ, Sze HC, Chen YB, Choi HC, Guo QJ, et al: Proposal for the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer. 122:546–558. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Hua YJ, Chen MY, Qian CN, Hong MH, Zhao C, Guo L, Guo X and Cao KJ: Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 31:807–812. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Liu J, Ning X, Sun X, Lu H, Gu Y and Wang D: Endoscopic sequestrectomy for skull base osteoradionecrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A 10-year experience. Int J Clin Oncol. 24:248–255. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Delanian S, Chatel C, Porcher R, Depondt J and Lefaix JL: Complete restoration of refractory mandibular osteoradionecrosis by prolonged treatment with a pentoxifylline-tocopherol-clodronate combination (PENTOCLO): A phase II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 80:832–839. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Robard L, Louis MY, Blanchard D, Babin E and Delanian S: Medical treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible by PENTOCLO: Preliminary results. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 131:333–338. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Lyons A and Ghazali N: Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: Current understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 46:653–660. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Nordal RA, Nagy A, Pintilie M and Wong CS: Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 target genes in central nervous system radiation injury: A role for vascular endothelial growth factor. Clin Cancer Res. 10:3342–3353. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

O'Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, Fukai N, Vasios G, Lane WS, Flynn E, Birkhead JR, Olsen BR and Folkman J: Endostatin: An endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell. 88:277–285. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Perletti G, Concari P, Giardini R, Marras E, Piccinini F, Folkman J and Chen L: Antitumor activity of endostatin against carcinogen-induced rat primary mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 60:1793–1796. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Bergers G, Javaherian K, Lo KM, Folkman J and Hanahan D: Effects of angiogenesis inhibitors on multistage carcinogenesis in mice. Science. 284:808–812. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Boehm T, Folkman J, Browder T and O'Reilly MS: Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance. Nature. 390:404–407. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Kulke MH, Bergsland EK, Ryan DP, Enzinger PC, Lynch TJ, Zhu AX, Meyerhardt JA, Heymach JV, Fogler WE, Sidor C, et al: Phase II study of recombinant human endostatin in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol. 24:3555–3561. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Peng F, Xu Z, Wang J, Chen Y, Li Q, Zuo Y, Chen J, Hu X, Zhou Q, Wang Y, et al: Recombinant human endostatin normalizes tumor vasculature and enhances radiation response in xenografted human nasopharyngeal carcinoma models. PLoS One. 7(e34646)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Wang Y, Xuan Z, Zheng X, Han R, Zhou L, Liu H and Liu Y: Efficacy of endostar combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and analysis of vascular endothelial factor and C-reactive protein levels in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under contrast enhanced ultrasound. J BUON. 25:407–414. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Cheng YJ, Meng CT, Ying HY, Zhou JF, Yan XY, Gao X, Zhou N and Bai CM: Effect of Endostar combined with chemotherapy in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Medicine (Baltimore). 97(e12750)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Zhou ZT, Zhou FX, Wei Q, Zou LY, Qin BF and Peng XS: Phase II study of cisplatin/etoposide and endostar for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 68:1027–1032. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Wang X, Shi Y, Jia Y, Zhao W, Zhang L, Bai G, Ren Y, Chen YZ and Tong Z: Tolerance and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human endostatin administered as single-dose or multiple-dose infusions in patients with advanced solid tumors: A phase I clinical trial. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 20(15330338211064434)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Eder JP Jr, Supko JG, Clark JW, Puchalski TA, Garcia-Carbonero R, Ryan DP, Shulman LN, Proper J, Kirvan M, Rattner B, et al: Phase I clinical trial of recombinant human endostatin administered as a short intravenous infusion repeated daily. J Clin Oncol. 20:3772–3784. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2023
Volume 19 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tang J, Li X, Wu Y, Su Z, He Y, Sun X, Cao X, Li Y, Wang B, Zou G, Zou G, et al: Treating radiation‑related nasopharyngeal necrosis with endostar in patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A report of two cases and a literature review. Mol Clin Oncol 19: 57, 2023
APA
Tang, J., Li, X., Wu, Y., Su, Z., He, Y., Sun, X. ... Zou, G. (2023). Treating radiation‑related nasopharyngeal necrosis with endostar in patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A report of two cases and a literature review. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 19, 57. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2653
MLA
Tang, J., Li, X., Wu, Y., Su, Z., He, Y., Sun, X., Cao, X., Li, Y., Wang, B., Zou, G."Treating radiation‑related nasopharyngeal necrosis with endostar in patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A report of two cases and a literature review". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 19.1 (2023): 57.
Chicago
Tang, J., Li, X., Wu, Y., Su, Z., He, Y., Sun, X., Cao, X., Li, Y., Wang, B., Zou, G."Treating radiation‑related nasopharyngeal necrosis with endostar in patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A report of two cases and a literature review". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 19, no. 1 (2023): 57. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2653