Open Access

A phase I clinical trial of dTCApFs, a derivative of a novel human hormone peptide, for the treatment of advanced/metastatic solid tumors

  • Authors:
    • Salomon M. Stemmer
    • Ofer Benjaminov
    • Michael H. Silverman
    • Uziel Sandler
    • Ofer Purim
    • Naomi Sender
    • Chen Meir
    • Pnina Oren‑Apoteker
    • Joel Ohana
    • Yoram Devary
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 15, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1505
  • Pages:22-29
  • Copyright: © Stemmer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: HTML 0 views | PDF 0 views     Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of the present phase I first‑in‑human study was to investigate the safety/efficacy of dTCApFs (a novel hormone peptide that enters cells through the T1/ST2 receptor), in advanced/metastatic solid tumors. The primary objective of this open‑label dose‑escalation study was to determine the safety profile of dTCApFs. The study enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with pathologically confirmed locally advanced/metastatic solid malignancies, who experienced treatment failure or were unable to tolerate previous standard therapy. The study included 17 patients (64% male; median age, 65 years; 47% colorectal cancer, 29% pancreatic cancer). The patients received 1‑3 cycles of escalating dTCApFs doses (6‑96 mg/m2). The mean number ± standard deviation of treatment cycles/patient was 3.2±1.4; no dose‑limiting toxicities were observed up to a dose of 96 mg/m2, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Half‑life, maximal plasma concentration, and dTCApFs exposure were found to be linearly correlated with dose. Five patients were treated for ≥3 months (12, 24, 48 mg/m2) and experienced stable disease throughout the treatment period, and 1 experienced pathological complete response. Analysis of serum biomarkers revealed decreased levels of angiogenic factors at dTCApFs concentrations of 12‑48 mg/m2, increased levels of anticancer cytokines, and induction of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress biomarker GRP78/BiP. Efficacy and biomarker data suggest that patients whose tumors were T1/ST2‑positive exhibited a better response to dTCApFs. In conclusion, dTCApFs was found to be safe/well‑tolerated, and potentially efficacious, with linear pharmacokinetics. Consistent with preclinical studies, the mechanism through which dTCApFs exerts anticancer effects appears to involve induction of ER stress, suppression of angiogenesis, and activation of the innate immune response. However, further studies are warranted.

Introduction

dTCApFs (Nerofe™, Immune System Key Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) is a novel hormone peptide (14 amino acids) with a demonstrated anticancer activity in the preclinical setting (personal communication with Dr Devary's laboratory, ISK Ltd.). dTCApFs is a derivative of the tumor cell apoptosis factor (TCApF), a 84-amino acid hormone peptide naturally expressed in the thymus, colon and frontal lobe of the brain (1).

Studies in pancreatic, breast and ovarian cell lines investigating the mechanism of action (MOA) through which dTCApFs exerts its anticancer effects, revealed that dTCApFs enters the cells through the T1/ST2 receptor (a member of the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor superfamily), and leads to apoptosis of cancer cells through a novel MOA involving induction of two opposing effects: Induction of structural changes in the Golgi apparatus, loss of Golgi function and induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, along with downregulation of the ER stress repair mechanism (personal communication).

We herein report the results of the first-in-human study investigating the safety and efficacy of dTCApFs for the treatment of advanced/metastatic solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Patients

The present study included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with pathologically confirmed locally advanced and/or metastatic solid malignancies, who experienced treatment failure or were unable to tolerate previous standard therapy. The key inclusion criteria included evaluable/measurable disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients with liver cancer/hepatic metastases were considered eligible if liver function met certain criteria, and patients with brain metastases were considered eligible if radiation therapy was completed ≥4 weeks prior to enrollment and the patient received ≤4 mg/day of dexamethasone. The key exclusion criteria included receiving anticancer treatment 14 days prior to the initiation of the study drug, and a life expectancy of <16 weeks.

Study design

This was a formal open-label phase I dose-escalation study. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of dTCApFs. Assessments included drug exposure, adverse events (AEs) graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5×7.pdf), and characterization of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Other objectives included assessment of serum levels of angiogenic factors following dTCApFs administration, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) analyses, as well as assessment of receptor staining and tumor response.

The dose escalation study followed a traditional ‘3+3’ scheme and included doses of 6, 12, 24, 48 and 96 mg/m2 of intravenous (IV) dTCApFs, 3 times/week in consecutive 28-day cycles. The patient's allocation is presented in Fig. 1. In all 3-patient cohorts, there was an interval of 2 weeks between the first dose for the first and second patients, and ≥1 week for the third patient. New dose levels started after a follow-up of ≥28 days for the 3 patients at the previous level. MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which ≥1 of the 3 subjects experienced a DLT during their first cycle of treatment. Patients who did not complete their first cycle of treatment for reasons unrelated to AEs were replaced. In addition, PK parameters, including area under the curve (AUC), maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and plasma half-life (t1/2) were determined. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental models.

The clinical activity of dTCApFs was assessed every 8 weeks by physical examination, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging techniques (for evaluable disease only), using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1 (https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/docs/recist_guideline.pdf); where appropriate, informative tumor markers were measured in every cycle.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Rabin Medical Center and the Ministry of Health of Israel, and was conducted at the Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All the patients signed an informed consent prior to enrollment. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01690741).

Biomarker analysis

Blood samples were collected from patients and placed on ice for 10 min. Serum samples were collected by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, kept in separate vials at ≤-20°C, and shipped to Immune System Key Ltd. at −20°C, where they were thawed, aliquoted, and stored at ≤-20°C. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles were avoided.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed for T1/ST2 receptor using a full-length anti-ST2 antibody (GenMed, Plymouth, MN, USA). Serum levels of various factors were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The measured factors included vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-D, epidermal growth factor, angiopoietin-1, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-1, FGF-2, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, PDGF-BB, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (all using ELISA kits by R&D systems, Abingdon, UK); granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin (IL)-2, IL-12p70, IL-21 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA); and glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78)/BiP (Enzo, New York, NY, USA).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used for all analyses and were performed with SAS® software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Regression analysis was used to study 2-way correlation between tumor change per month, administered doses of dTCApF, and levels of the ER-stress biomarker (BiP). The statistical significance of the correlation was validated using F-statistics.

Results

Patients

A total of 39 patients were screened, of whom were 17 enrolled and completed the study. The majority of the patients (64%) were male, and the median age (range) was 65 (51–94) years. Almost half of the patients (47%) had colorectal cancer and 29% had pancreatic cancer. Apart from 1 patient, all other patients had received several lines of anticancer therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy and biological therapy) prior to enrolment (Table I). The patients received 1–3 cycles of escalating dTCApFs doses (6, 12, 24, 48 and 96 mg/m2), as detailed in Fig. 1.

Table I.

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.

Table I.

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.

dTCApFs dose, mg/m2

Characteristics6 (n=3)12 (n=3)24 (n=3)48 (n=3)96 (n=5)
Age, years
  Median (range)63 (62–77)61 (58–62)65 (57–67)72 (51–94)64 (55–77)
  Mean (SE)68 (5)67 (4)67 (2)72 (8)64 (9)
  Sex, n (male/female)3/02/11/22/13/2
Tumor type, n
  Colorectal32021
  Pancreatic00104
  Othera01210
Prior therapies, n
  Chemotherapy34413
  Radiotherapy12110
  Surgery22112
  Treatment with biological agents00100
  Treatment with small molecules, such as TKIs.00010

a Includes neoplasms in the small intestine, lung, liver, and spinal cord. SE, standard error; TKIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Safety and tolerability

The mean number of treatment cycles per patient was 3.2±1.4. No DLTs were observed in any patient up to cohort 5. The AEs are summarized in Table II. None were related to the study drug. Hypertension, anemia, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain were the most frequently reported grade 2 AEs, and hypertension was the most frequently reported grade 3 AE. Vomiting was the only grade 4 AE, reported in 1 patient. The majority of the AEs were self-resolving. Overall, treatment with dTCApFs was well-tolerated, with no cumulative toxicity. MTD was not reached.

Table II.

Summary of adverse events by dTCApFs dose group.

Table II.

Summary of adverse events by dTCApFs dose group.

dTCApFs dose, mg/m2

Adverse events6 (n=3)12 (n=3)24 (n=3)48 (n=3)96 (n=5)
Grade 1
  Blood disorders
    Anemia30000
    Increased INR00010
  GI disorders
    Abdominal pain01200
    Bowel obstruction10000
    Diarrhea02002
    GI hemorrhage10000
    Vomiting20001
  General disorders
    Dehydration00001
    Fatigue01010
    Hypertension31101
  Nervous system disorders
    Neuropathy01100
Grade 2
  Pain
    Pain, leg02000
    Pain, upper back00001
  Respiratory system disorders
    Cough01000
  Skin disorders
    Pruritus00001
    Urticaria00001
  Hepatic and urinary disorders
    ALT increase00001
    AST increase00001
    Bilirubin increase00011
    Liver dysfunction00001
    Urinary tract infection01000
Grade 3
  Blood disorders
    Increased INR00010
  General disorders
    Hypertension21102
  Hepatic and urinary disorders
    Bilirubin increase00011
  GI disorders
    Bowel obstruction10000
    Diarrhea01001
    GI hemorrhage10000
Grade 4
  GI disorders
    Vomiting00001

[i] ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GI, gastrointestinal; INR, international normalized ratio.

PK results

The PK results for the first day of cycles 1 and 2 are summarized in Table III; t1/2, Cmax and AUC0 were found to be linearly correlated with dose. Dose-dependent plasma concentrations of dTCApFs were observed (Fig. 2).

Table III.

Pharmacokinetics of dTCApFs on the first day of cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle was 28 days).

Table III.

Pharmacokinetics of dTCApFs on the first day of cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle was 28 days).

Cycle 1, day 1Cycle 2, day 1


dTCApFs dose, mg/m26 (n=3)12 (n=4)24 (n=4)48 (n=4)96 (n=3)6 (n=3)12 (n=4)24 (n=4)48 (n=4)96 (n=3)
AUC0, ng·h/ml3,81312,90549,63079,935206,7429,71911,45257,069100,093294,682
Cmax, ng/ml1,2096,04814,60918,26732,9641,5366,04814,60922,11332,016
t1/2, h2.32.13.24.96.02.82.03.74.68.5

[i] AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximal plasma concentration; t1/2, plasma half-life.

Efficacy

Of the 17 patients who were treated for ≥3 months (12, 24 and 48 mg/m2), 5 experienced stable disease (SD) throughout the treatment period. Notably, 1 patient was suffering from lower back pain, weakness and referred pain in the left extremity, due to a spinal cord neoplasia compressing the spinal cord (Ki-67, 30%; ST2-positive staining). Treatment with painkillers (e.g., tramadol, oxycodone/naloxone, morphine and pregabalin) was unsuccessful, and the patient used a walker. After 6 months of treatment (12, 24 and 48 mg/m2), the patient's walking improved without the need for any painkiller medication. Surgery was performed after 11 months of treatment. At surgery, no malignancy was observed; however, scar tissue and bleeding were noted, and the histopathological analysis revealed strong presence of natural killer (NK) cells and dendritic cells. A second patient who entered the study with progressive disease after receiving 4 prior lines of chemotherapy treatment, maintained SD through 6 cycles of dTCApFs (6 and 12 mg/m2).

Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis revealed that 6 patients experienced a longer PFS on dTCApFs compared with their prior regimen, and 1 patient had a PFS that was comparable to that on his prior regimen; 1 patient who had not receive prior treatments was able to remain on the study drug for 330 days (Table IV). A regression analysis [robust regression model (2,3)] computing F statistics P-values revealed a statistically significant correlation between changes in tumor size and the administered dTCApFs doses (Fig. 3).

Table IV.

PFS on the last regimen before enrolling the study and on dTCApFs.

Table IV.

PFS on the last regimen before enrolling the study and on dTCApFs.

Patient no.PFS on the last regimen pre-enrollment, daysPFS on dTCApFs, days
  1   480  53
  2   134  25
  3   110   170
  4       0330
  5     52   51
  6   384110
  7     54   90
  8     80  52
  9   375  60
101,800  14
11     41   52
12     42   50
13     96  42
14   365  40
15       1   80
16   105  45
17   564  41

[i] Rows with bold print represent patients who experienced PFS on dTCApFs, which was comparable with or exceeded that of their last regimen pre-enrollment. PFS, progression-free survival.

Biomarker analysis

Treatment with dTCApFs at a dose of 6 mg/m2 led to an increase in serum levels of angiopoietin-1, FGF-1, FGF-2, PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, VEGF-D, TGF-β and VEGF. At doses of 12–48 mg/m2, a decrease in the serum levels of these factors was observed, and at 96 mg/m2, an increase in all factors, except for VEGF-D, was noted. In addition, the serum levels of all anticancer cytokines, such as GM-CSF, IL2, IL-12p70, IL-21 and TNF-α, increased with dTCApFs administration in all dose levels (Table V).

Table V.

Mean change (%) in serum levels of angiogenic factors and cytokines pre- to post- treatment with dTCApFs.

Table V.

Mean change (%) in serum levels of angiogenic factors and cytokines pre- to post- treatment with dTCApFs.

dTCApFs dose, mg/m2

Factors6 (n=3)12 (n=3)24 (n=3)48 (n=3)96 (n=5)
Angiogenic factors
  Angiopoietin-1+960−80−77−50+70
  FGF-1+120−62−20−27+457
  FGF-2+199−74−34−13+44
  PDGF-AA+1,379−92−79−73+57
  PDGF-BB+2,271−95−82−78+185
  VEGF-A+265−47−62−72−2
  TGF-β1+18−80−59−20No data
  VEGF-D+117−40−54−63+3
Cytokines
  GM-CSF+2,173−97+11+5,613+974
  IL-12-p70+469−76+83+477+332
  IL-2No data−100No data+242+577
  IL-21+100−61+84+1,326+29
  TNF-α+4−5+31+74+97

[i] FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL, interleukin; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

To assess the MOA of dTCApFs, patients were examined by their T1/ST2 status, as dTCApFs has been shown to enter the cells through this receptor (personal communication). A total of 14 patients underwent CT at 8 weeks and were evaluable for this analysis. We observed that patients whose tumors were T1/ST2-positive (by IHC) remained in the trial longer compared with those whose tumors were T1/ST2-negative (Fig. 4A) and experienced SD on dTCApFs treatment. Therefore, the patient population was re-analyzed (changes in tumor size vs. administered dTCApFs dose), after excluding T1/ST2-positive patients (n=9). In this re-analysis, the correlation coefficient increased from 0.56 to 0.76, and the standard deviation for tumor size decreased from 4.6 to 2.6 (P=0.02). A separate statistically valid regression analysis for the subpopulation of T1/ST2-positive patients could not be performed due to the small sample size (n=4). The serum levels of the GRP78/BiP protein (ER stress biomarker) were also measured prior to the initiation of dTCApFs treatment and after 29 days of treatment. A statistically significant correlation was observed between administered dTCApFs doses and change in serum GRP78/BiP levels (P≤0.05), as well as between changes in tumor size and change in serum GRP78/BiP levels (P≤0.002), suggesting that dTCApFs induced ER stress (Fig. 4B and C). These correlation analyses were then repeated after excluding T1/ST2-negative patients, and an increase in the correlation coefficients (for dTCApFs vs. change in GRP78/BiP levels, from 0.57 to 0.75; for change in GRP78/BiP levels vs. changes in tumor size, from 0.79 to 0.83) were observed, along with a decrease in the standard deviation for GRP78/BiP changes (from 184 to 67 and from 148 to 36, respectively). These changes were statistically significant (P≤0.01).

Discussion

The aim of the present phase I dose-escalation study was to investigate dTCApFs, a novel hormone peptide, whose activity is driven by its interaction with the T1/ST2 receptor and its anticancer activity is exerted through several MOAs, including a unique MOA involving ER stress induction and downregulation of the ER stress repair mechanism. Intravenous dTCApFs was found to be safe, well-tolerated and potentially efficacious in treating advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Furthermore, the PK examinations revealed that t1/2, Cmax, AUC0 and plasma concentrations of dTCApFs were linearly correlated with dose. In addition, that dTCApFs was found to have anti-angiogenic activity, as well as the ability to induce ER stress and expression of anticancer cytokines.

The present phase I study provides insight into the MOA by which dTCApFs exerts its anticancer effects. dTCApFs enters the cells through the T1/ST2 receptor (personal communication). T1/ST2 is a member of the IL-1 receptor family and IL-33, which regulate the Th1/Th2 immune responses in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Lipopolysaccharides have been shown to stimulate T1/ST2 expression in monocytes, muscle cells and splenocytes, both in vitro and in vivo (4). The T1/ST2 receptor is expressed in macrophages, dendritic cells, as well as in mast cells. This receptor is a stable marker of Th2 polarized thymocytes (but not of Th1 polarized thymocytes) and is important in the response of Th2 to viral antigens and allergens (57). T1/ST2 has been shown to play an important role in various diseases, including cancer, Alzheimer's disease, inflammatory diseases, trauma, sepsis, cardiovascular diseases and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (614). Knocking out this receptor in BALB/c mice bearing mammary carcinoma attenuated tumor growth and metastasis. In these knockout mice (compared with wild-type mice), the serum levels of IL-17, interferon-γ and TNF-α increased, along with higher ex vivo cytotoxic activity of splenocytes, NK cells and CD8+ T cells (1). In the present study, dTCApFs treatment led to increased serum levels of anticancer cytokines (e.g., GM-CSF, IL-12p70, IL-2, IL-21 and TNF-α), likely due to the downregulation of the T1/ST2 receptor. In addition, a correlation between the antitumor activity of dTCApFs and T1/ST2 expression status in the tumors was observed. A direct correlation was found between T1/ST2 positivity, tumor size changes and induction of ER stress. These findings are consistent with preclinical studies, where treating ST2 gene knockout OV-90 cells with dTCApFs did not result in ER stress. Taken together, these observations suggest that the T1/ST2 receptor may serve as a biomarker to select T1/ST2-positive patients who are more likely to respond to dTCApFs. Additionally, the biomarker analysis revealed that dTCApFs treatment increased the levels of IL-21 and IL12p70, which are known activators of NK cells (15,16), as well as the levels of GM-CSF and IL-2, which are known activators of dendritic cells (17,18). Furthermore, histopathological analysis of a post-treatment surgical specimen from a patient who achieved a complete response revealed strong presence of NK and dendritic cells. These findings suggest that dTCApFs may activate the innate immune response, consistent with prior studies showing such response with ST2 activation (19,20). Drugs with MOAs involving ST2 activation are currently being investigated (21,22). dTCApFs was also found to have broad anti-angiogenic properties (it reduced the expression of multiple angiogenic factors at levels of 12–48 mg/m2). Targeting angiogenesis is a well-established MOA in anticancer drugs, with commercially available and investigational drugs targeting factors such as VEGF and FGF receptors (5,2325). It should be noted that, despite an observed increase in the levels of angiogenic factors with dTCApFs treatment at the highest investigated dose (96 mg/m2), the cytotoxic activity of dTCApFs was, in fact, enhanced at this dose level, possibly due to another MOA of dTCApFs.

Notably, the findings of dTCApFs-induced ER stress are consistent with our preclinical studies showing a novel mechanism involving two opposing effects of dTCApFs that together result in apoptosis: ER stress induction, and downregulation of the ER stress repair mechanism. Specifically, dTCApFs molecules enter the cells through the ST2 receptor. Subsequently, they bind to the sST2 soluble T1/ST2 receptor, enter the Golgi apparatus, and induce structural changes that lead to destruction of the Golgi apparatus and loss of Golgi function. This, in turn, leads to accumulation of proteins in the ER, resulting in ER stress. dTCApFs also downregulates sXBP1 and, thus, inhibits the ER stress repair mechanism, leading to apoptosis. Interestingly, over the last decade, the interaction between ER stress and tissue vascularization has been intensively investigated and a clear interaction between the stress-response mechanism and VEGF was observed in cancer, diabetic retinopathy, atherosclerosis and ischaemic renal disease (26). GRP78/BiP is as an ER stress marker, and its upregulation following anti-angiogenic therapy has been demonstrated in multiple studies. For example, Han et al, demonstrated that sunitinib treatment, which inhibits PDGF and vascular VEGFR receptors, induced hypoxia in Caki-1 xenografts, that was followed by elevated expression of GRP78/BiP in the treated group compared with the control group (27). It may be hypothesized that dTCApFS interrupts angiogenesis, thereby causing accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER of the cancer cells, resulting in ER stress, leading to apoptosis.

In conclusion, treatment with intravenous dTCApFs (6–96 mg/m2, 3 times/week, in consecutive 28-day cycles) in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors was found to be safe and well-tolerated, with a dose-dependent, linear PK. dTCApFs suppressed angiogenic factors, induced anticancer cytokine production and ER stress, which likely led to the clinical outcome observed in some of our patients. Positive T1/ST2 staining may serve as a predictive marker for response to dTCApFs. Further studies on the efficacy of dTCApFs in advanced malignancies expressing high levels of T1/ST2 are warranted.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by ISK and Israel Chief Scientist grants (grant no. 54811). Silverman MH, Sandler U, Oren-Apoteker P, Ohana J and Devary Y are employed by ISK.

References

1 

Sandler U, Devary O, Braitbard O, Ohana J, Kass G, Rubinstein AM, Friedman ZY and Devary Y: NEROFE-a novel human hormone-peptide with anti-cancer activity. J Exp Ther Oncol. 8:327–339. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Marazzi A: Algorithms, routines and S functions for robust statistics: The FORTRAN library ROBETH with an interface to S-PLUS. Chapman and Hall; New York City, NY: 1993

3 

Fox J: Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods. Sage Publications, Inc.; London, England: 1997

4 

Saccani S, Polentarutti N, Penton-Rol G, Sims JE and Mantovani A: Divergent effects of LPS on expression of IL-1 receptor family members in mononuclear phagocytes in vitro and in vivo. Cytokine. 10:773–780. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Gutheil JC, Campbell TN, Pierce PR, Watkins JD, Huse WD, Bodkin DJ and Cheresh DA: Targeted antiangiogenic therapy for cancer using Vitaxin: A humanized monoclonal antibody to the integrin alphavbeta3. Clin Cancer Res. 6:3056–3061. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Lu DP, Zhou XY, Yao LT, Liu CG, Ma W, Jin F and Wu YF: Serum soluble ST2 is associated with ER-positive breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 14:1982014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

O'Donnell C, Mahmoud A, Keane J, Murphy C, White D, Carey S, O'Riordain M, Bennett MW, Brint E and Houston A: An antitumorigenic role for the IL-33 receptor, ST2L, in colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 114:37–43. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Lambrecht BN, De Veerman M, Coyle AJ, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Thielemans K and Pauwels RA: Myeloid dendritic cells induce Th2 responses to inhaled antigen, leading to eosinophilic airway inflammation. J Clin Invest. 106:551–559. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Walzl G, Matthews S, Kendall S, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Coyle AJ, Openshaw PJ and Hussell T: Inhibition of T1/ST2 during respiratory syncytial virus infection prevents T helper cell type 2 (Th2)- but not Th1-driven immunopathology. J Exp Med. 193:785–792. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Coyle AJ, Lloyd C, Tian J, Nguyen T, Erikkson C, Wang L, Ottoson P, Persson P, Delaney T, Lehar S, et al: Crucial role of the interleukin 1 receptor family member T1/ST2 in T helper cell type 2-mediated lung mucosal immune responses. J Exp Med. 190:895–902. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Meisel C, Bonhagen K, Löhning M, Coyle AJ, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Radbruch A and Kamradt T: Regulation and function of T1/ST2 expression on CD4+ T cells: Induction of type 2 cytokine production by T1/ST2 cross-linking. J Immunol. 166:3143–3150. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Xu D, Chan WL, Leung BP, Huang FP, Wheeler R, Piedrafita D, Robinson JH and Liew FY: Selective expression of a stable cell surface molecule on type 2 but not type 1 helper T cells. J Exp Med. 187:787–794. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Townsend MJ, Fallon PG, Matthews DJ, Jolin HE and McKenzie AN: T1/ST2-deficient mice demonstrate the importance of T1/ST2 in developing primary T helper cell type 2 responses. J Exp Med. 191:1069–1076. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Xiong Z, Thangavel R, Kempuraj D, Yang E, Zaheer S and Zaheer A: Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for the expression of interleukin-33 and its receptor ST2 in the brain. J Alzheimers Dis. 40:297–308. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Van Elssen CH, Vanderlocht J, Frings PW, Senden-Gijsbers BL, Schnijderberg MC, van Gelder M, Meek B, Libon C, Ferlazzo G, Germeraad WT and Bos GM: Klebsiella pneumoniae-triggered DC recruit human NK cells in a CCR5-dependent manner leading to increased CCL19-responsiveness and activation of NK cells. Eur J Immunol. 40:3138–3149. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Frederiksen KS, Lundsgaard D, Freeman JA, Hughes SD, Holm TL, Skrumsager BK, Petri A, Hansen LT, McArthur GA, Davis ID and Skak K: IL-21 induces in vivo immune activation of NK cells and CD8(+) T cells in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 57:1439–1449. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wuest SC, Edwan JH, Martin JF, Han S, Perry JS, Cartagena CM, Matsuura E, Maric D, Waldmann TA and Bielekova B: A role for interleukin-2 trans-presentation in dendritic cell-mediated T cell activation in humans, as revealed by daclizumab therapy. Nat Med. 17:604–609. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

van de Laar L, Coffer PJ and Woltman AM: Regulation of dendritic cell development by GM-CSF: Molecular control and implications for immune homeostasis and therapy. Blood. 119:3383–3393. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Rank MA, Kobayashi T, Kozaki H, Bartemes KR, Squillace DL and Kita H: IL-33-activated dendritic cells induce an atypical TH2-type response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 123:1047–1054. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Nabekura T, Girard JP and Lanier LL: IL-33 receptor ST2 amplifies the expansion of NK cells and enhances host defense during mouse cytomegalovirus infection. J Immunol. 194:5948–5952. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

ClinicalTrials.gov, . Description of a trial investigating Interleukin-12 in ovarian epithelial cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. simplehttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00016289?term=IL12p70&rank=7January 11–2017

22 

ClinicalTrials.gov, . Description of the recombinant interleukin-21 in metastatic melanoma and kidney cancer. simplehttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00095108?term=IL-21&rank=7January 11–2017

23 

Vasudev NS and Reynolds AR: Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: Current progress, unresolved questions and future directions. Angiogenesis. 17:471–494. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Boehm T, Folkman J, Browder T and O'Reilly MS: Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance. Nature. 390:404–407. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Jain RK: Antiangiogenic therapy for cancer: Current and emerging concepts. Oncology (Williston Park). 19 4 Suppl 3:S7–S16. 2005.

26 

Tahergorabi Z and Khazaei M: Imbalance of angiogenesis in diabetic complications: The mechanisms. Int J Prev Med. 3:827–838. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Han KS, Li N, Raven PA, Fazli L, Frees S, Ettinger S, Park KC, Hong SJ, Gleave ME and So AI: Inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein glucose-regulated protein 78 potentiates anti-angiogenic therapy in renal cell carcinoma through inactivation of the PERK/eIF2α pathway. Oncotarget. 6:34818–34830. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2018
Volume 8 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Stemmer, S.M., Benjaminov, O., Silverman, M.H., Sandler, U., Purim, O., Sender, N. ... Devary, Y. (2018). A phase I clinical trial of dTCApFs, a derivative of a novel human hormone peptide, for the treatment of advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 8, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1505
MLA
Stemmer, S. M., Benjaminov, O., Silverman, M. H., Sandler, U., Purim, O., Sender, N., Meir, C., Oren‑Apoteker, P., Ohana, J., Devary, Y."A phase I clinical trial of dTCApFs, a derivative of a novel human hormone peptide, for the treatment of advanced/metastatic solid tumors". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 8.1 (2018): 22-29.
Chicago
Stemmer, S. M., Benjaminov, O., Silverman, M. H., Sandler, U., Purim, O., Sender, N., Meir, C., Oren‑Apoteker, P., Ohana, J., Devary, Y."A phase I clinical trial of dTCApFs, a derivative of a novel human hormone peptide, for the treatment of advanced/metastatic solid tumors". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 8, no. 1 (2018): 22-29. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1505