Association of the interleukin-18 receptor 1 and interleukin-18 receptor accessory protein polymorphisms with the risk of esophageal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Jingfeng Zhu
    • Chao Liu
    • Xiao Teng
    • Jun Yin
    • Liang Zheng
    • Liming Wang
    • Weifeng Tang
    • Haiyong Gu
    • Bing Gu
    • Liang Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 7, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.552
  • Pages: 227-235
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated fatalities and the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer. In addition to environmental risk factors, genetic factors may have a significant role in esophageal cancer carcinogenesis. A hospital‑based case‑control study was conducted to evaluate the genetic effects of functional single‑nucleotide polymorphisms in the interleukin‑18 (IL‑18), IL‑18 receptor 1 protein (IL‑18R1), IL‑18 receptor accessory protein (IL‑18RAP) and IL‑28B on the development of esophageal cancer. In total, 380 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cases and 380 controls were recruited for the present study. The IL‑18 rs360719 A>G, IL‑18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL‑18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL‑28B rs8099917 T>G genotypes were determined. No association was observed between the IL‑18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL‑18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL‑28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of ESCC. However, in stratification analyses, a significantly decreased risk of ESCC associated with the IL‑18R1 rs13015714 G>T polymorphism and a significantly increased risk of ESCC associated with the IL‑18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphism was evident among male patients and patients who smoked or consumed alcohol. These findings highlighted that functional polymorphisms IL‑18R1 rs13015714 G>T and IL‑18RAP rs917997 C>T may contribute to ESCC susceptibility among these subgroups. However, the present results were obtained with a limited sample size and further epidemiological studies are warranted to clarify the role of IL-18R1 and IL-18RAP variants in the development of ESCC.

Introduction

Esophageal carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated fatalities and the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer in China in 2010 (1). For esophageal cancer patients, the prior study reported that the 5-year survival rate is extremely poor and accounts for only 12.3% (2). In the highest-risk area, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for >90% of esophageal cancers (3,4). ESCC carcinogenesis is multifactorial, and in addition to the established environmental risk factors, such as heavy drinking and smoking (5), genetic aberrations, such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), may have significant roles (6).

Interleukin-18 (IL-18), an interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-inducing factor, upregulates several cytokines, including IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α, and IFN-γ promotes T helper cell type 1 (Th1) differentiation (7). IL-18 is also one of the main cytokines of the inflammasomes and has been confirmed to effect carcinogenesis and tumor progression significantly (8). The IL-18 receptor is comprised of IL-18 receptor accessory protein (IL-18RAP) and IL-18 receptor 1 (IL-18R1) protein (9,10). Upon binding to its receptor, IL-18R1 protein, IL-18 triggers the recruitment of IL-18RAP, which initiates signaling. IL-18 has a critical role in MyD88-mediated signaling to prevent colon adenocarcinoma development (11). IL-18RAP forms the signaling chain of this receptor complex and has been shown to be crucial for signaling of IL-18, resulting in the production of IFN-γ (12). These two subunits of the IL-18R are mainly expressed on Th1 cells in response to IL-12 and/or IFN-α (13). IL-18RAP was also correlated with inflammatory bowel disease (14). A previous study reported that the IL-18R1 and IL-18RAP genes were associated with atherosclerosis and its cardiovascular complications (15).

IL-18 is located at the 11q22.2–22.3 chromosome and its promoter region is relatively unique and is comprised of several transcription initiation sites. The IL-18 rs360719 polymorphism (A→G mutation) leads to loss of the octamer transcription factor-1 (OCT-1) transcription factor binding site. OCT-1 is identified as a ubiquitously expressed factor and has an important role in the regulation of certain genes. OCT-1 can also downregulate the expression of specific cytokines (16). Allele A of rs917997, an SNP that is 1.5 kb downstream of IL-18RAP, was strongly associated with coeliac disease susceptibility (17). This allele is also correlated with lower mRNA levels of IL-18RAP in whole blood. Furthermore, the IL-18RAP GA haplotype of rs13015714 and rs917997 showed the strongest association with coeliac disease (17).

The IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphism has been demonstrated with the response to IFN-γ-based antiviral therapy in the natural course of hepatitis C and following liver transplantation (18,19).

The biological and pathological significance of IL-18, IL-18R1, IL-18RAP and IL-28B suggested that the functional genetic variations in these genes may contribute to the development of ESCC. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the association between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G genotypes and ESCC susceptibility in a hospital-based case-control study. Genotyping analyses were performed for these 4 SNPs with 380 ESCC cases and 380 cancer-free controls in a Chinese Han population.

Patients and methods

Ethical approval of the study protocol

The study was approved by the Review Board of Jiangsu University (Zhenjiang, China). The study complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects and/or animals. All the subjects provided written informed consent for inclusion in the study.

Study subjects

A total of 380 subjects with esophageal cancer were consecutively recruited from the Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (Zhenjiang, China) between October 2008 and November 2009. By pathological analysis, all the esophageal cancer cases were diagnosed as ESCC. The exclusion criteria were patients who previously had: Cancer; any metastasized cancer; radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Frequency-matched to the cases with regards to age (±5 years) and gender, the controls were patients without cancer that were recruited from the two hospitals during the same time period. The majority of the control subjects were admitted to these two hospitals for the treatment of trauma.

Using a pre-tested questionnaire, demographic data (such as age and gender) and the associated ESCC risk factors were collected by trained interviewers. The definition of ‘smokers’ was individuals who smoked one cigarette per day for >1 year. The definition of ‘alcohol drinkers’ was subjects who consumed ≥3 alcoholic drinks a week for >6 months.

Isolation of DNA and genotyping by a custom-by-design 48-Plex SNPscan™ kit

In total, 2-ml blood samples were collected from each subject using vacutainers and transferred to tubes lined with ethylenediamime-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen, Berlin, Germany). Sample DNA (10 ng) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction according to the manufacturer's instructions. For IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G SNPs, genotyping was performed using a custom-by-design 48-Plex SNPscan™ kit (Genesky Biotechnologies Inc., Shanghai, China), as previously described (20). For quality control, repeated analyses were conducted for 4% of randomly selected samples with high DNA quality.

Statistical analysis

Differences in the distributions of demographic characteristics, selected variables and genotypes of the IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G variants between the cases and controls were evaluated using the χ2 test. The associations between the 4 SNPs and risk of ESCC were estimated by computing the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses for crude and adjusted ORs when adjusting for age, gender, smoking and drinking status. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested by a goodness-of-fit χ2 test to compare the observed genotype frequencies to the expected ones among the control subjects. All the statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Characteristics of cases and controls included in the study are provided in Table I. The cases and controls appeared to be adequately matched on age and gender, as suggested by the χ2 tests (P=0.056 and P=0.346, respectively). As shown in Table I, no significant difference was detected on drinking status between the cases and the controls (P=0.183), however, smoking rate was higher in ESCC patients compared with the control subjects (P=0.014). In Table II, the primary information for these 4 genotyped SNPs is listed. The genotyping success rate was 96.97% for IL-18 rs360719 A>G, 96.45% for IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, 96.32% for IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and 97.11% for IL-28B rs8099917 T>G in all 760 samples. For all the SNPs, the concordance rates of repeated analyses were 100%. Minor allele frequency (MAF) in the controls was similar to MAF for Chinese subjects in a database for all 4 SNPs (Table II). The observed genotype frequencies for IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms in the controls were in HWE (P=0.774, P=0.249, P=0.465 and P=0.325, respectively) (Table II).

Table I.

Distribution of the selected demographic variables and risk factors in ESCC cases and controls.

Table I.

Distribution of the selected demographic variables and risk factors in ESCC cases and controls.

VariablesCases (n=380), n (%)Controls (n=380), n (%) P-valuea
Age, years
  <60142 (37.4)117 (30.8)0.056
  ≥60238 (62.6)263 (69.2)
Gender
  Male269 (70.8)257 (67.6)0.346
  Female111 (29.2)123 (32.4)
Tobacco use
  Never220 (57.9)253 (66.6)0.014
Ever160 (42.1)127 (33.4)
Alcohol use
  Never253 (66.6)270 (71.1)0.183
  Ever127 (33.4)110 (28.9)

a Two-sided χ2 test. ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Table II.

Primary information for IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms.

Table II.

Primary information for IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms.

Genotyped SNPsIL-18 rs360719 A>GIL-18R1 rs13015714 G>TIL-18RAP rs917997 C>T IL-28Brs8099917 T>G
Chromosome112219
Location5′-Flanking5′-Flanking3′-Flanking5′-Flanking
Chr Pos (genome build 36.3)11154135910233829710243700044435005
Regulome DB scorea2b6No data4
TFBSbY
MAFc for Chinese population0.1420.5470.4880.035
MAF in the controls (n=380)0.1340.5110.4960.049
P-value for HWEd test in our controls0.7740.2490.4650.325
Genotyping value, %96.9796.4596.3297.11

b TFBS, transcription factor binding site (http://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/snpfunc.htm);

c MAF, minor allele frequency; IL-18 rs360719 A>G MAF information was available for the Chinese Han and Japanese populations;

d HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-18R1, IL-18 receptor 1; IL-18RAP, IL-18 receptor accessory protein; Chr Pos, chromosome position; Y, yes.

Associations between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of ESCC

The genotype distributions of IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G in the cases and the controls are shown in Table III. In the single locus analyses, the genotype frequencies of IL-18 rs360719 A>G were 72.6 (AA), 26.4 (AG) and 1.1% (GG) in the case patients and 74.8 (AA), 23.6 (AG) and 1.6% (GG) in the control subjects, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.579). When the IL-18 rs360719 AA was used as the reference, the AG genotype was not associated with the risk for ESCC (AG vs. AA: Adjusted OR=1.15; 95% CI, 0.82–1.62; P=0.411); the GG genotype was not associated with the risk for ESCC (GG vs. AA: Adjusted OR=0.68; 95% CI, 0.19–2.46; P=0.553). In the dominant model, the IL-18 rs360719 AG/GG variants were not associated with the risk for ESCC, compared with the IL-18 rs360719 AA genotype (adjusted OR=1.12; 95% CI, 0.81–1.56; P=0.498). In the recessive model, when the IL-18R1 rs13015714 AA/AG genotypes were used as the reference group, the GG homozygote genotype was not associated with the risk for ESCC (adjusted OR=0.65; 95% CI, 0.18–2.37; P=0.517) (Table III).

Table III.

Logistic regression analyses of the associations between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of ESCC.

Table III.

Logistic regression analyses of the associations between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of ESCC.

GenotypeCasesn (n=380), (%)Controls (n=380), n (%)Crude OR (95% CI)P-valueAdjusted ORa (95% CI)P-value
IL-18 rs360719 A>G
  AA267 (72.6)276 (74.8)1.00 1.00
  AG97 (26.4)87 (23.6)1.15 (0.83–1.61)0.4061.15 (0.82–1.62)0.411
  GG4 (1.1)6 (1.6)0.69 (0.19–2.47)0.5680.68 (0.19–2.46)0.553
GG vs. AG vs. AA 0.579
  AG+GG101 (27.4)93 (25.2)1.12 (0.81–1.56)0.4901.12 (0.81–1.56)0.498
  AA+AG364 (98.9)363 (98.4)1.00 1.00
  GG4 (1.1)6 (1.6)0.67 (0.19–2.38)0.5300.65 (0.18–2.37)0.517
  G allele105 (14.3)99 (13.4)
IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T
  GG100 (27.5)83 (22.4)1.00 1.00
  GT173 (47.7)196 (53.0)0.73 (0.51–1.05)0.0860.71 (0.49–1.02)0.060
  TT90 (24.8)91 (24.6)0.82 (0.54–1.24)0.3480.83 (0.54–1.25)0.364
TT vs. GT vs. GG 0.229
  GT+TT263 (72.5)287 (77.6)0.76 (0.54–1.06)0.1100.75 (0.53–1.05)0.089
  GG+GT273 (75.2)279 (75.4)1.00 1.00
  TT90 (24.8)91 (24.6)1.01 (0.72–1.41)0.9501.04 (0.74–1.46)0.829
  T allele353 (48.6)378 (51.1)
IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T
  CC91 (25.0)90 (24.5)1.00 1.00
  CT167 (45.9)191 (51.9)0.87 (0.61–1.24)0.4260.84 (0.58–1.20)0.334
  TT106 (29.1)87 (23.6)1.21 (0.80–1.81)0.3691.19 (0.79–1.80)0.404
TT vs. CT vs. CC 0.177
  CT+TT273 (75.0)278 (75.5)0.97 (0.69–1.36)0.8650.95 (0.67–1.33)0.753
  CC+CT258 (70.9)281 (76.4)1.00 1.00
  TT106 (29.1)87 (23.6)1.33 (0.95–1.85)0.0931.34 (0.96–1.87)0.085
  T allele379 (52.1)365 (49.6)
IL-28B rs8099917 T>G
  TT335 (91.0)334 (90.3)1.00 1.00
  TG31 (8.4)36 (9.7)0.86 (0.52–1.42)0.5530.87 (0.52–1.44)0.585
  GG2 (0.5)0 (0.0)0.9800.980
GG vs. TG vs. TT 0.306
  TG+GG33 (9.0)36 (9.7)0.91 (0.56–1.50)0.7220.92 (0.56–1.52)0.741
  TT+TG366 (99.5)370 (100)1.00 1.00
  GG2 (0.5)0 (0.0)0.9800.980
  G allele35 (4.8)36 (4.9)

a Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status and alcohol consumption. IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-18R1, IL-18 receptor 1; IL-18RAP, IL-18 receptor accessory protein; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

No association was observed between IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of ESCC (Table III).

Stratification analyses of IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of ESCC

To evaluate the effects of IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G genotypes on ESCC risk according to different age, gender, smoking and alcohol drinking status, the stratification analyses were performed. A significantly decreased risk of ESCC associated with the IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T polymorphism was evident among male patients (GT+TT vs. GG: Adjusted OR=0.65; 95% CI, 0.43–0.98; P=0.040), patients who smoked (GT+TT vs. GG: Adjusted OR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.23–0.79; P=0.007) or were alcohol drinkers (GT+TT vs. GG: Adjusted OR=0.38; 95% CI, 0.19–0.76; P=0.006) (Table IV). A significantly increased risk of ESCC associated with the IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphism was evident among male patients (TT vs. CT+CC: Adjusted OR=1.58; 95% CI, 1.05–2.38; P=0.029), patients who smoked (TT vs. CT+CC: Adjusted OR=2.36; 95% CI, 1.29–4.30; P=0.005) or were alcohol drinkers (TT vs. CT+CC: Adjusted OR=3.01; 95% CI, 1.52–5.97; P=0.002) (Table V). For IL-18 rs360719 A>G and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms, no association was observed following stratification (data not shown).

Table IV.

Stratified analyses between the IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T polymorphism and ESCC risk by gender, age, smoking status and alcohol consumption.

Table IV.

Stratified analyses between the IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T polymorphism and ESCC risk by gender, age, smoking status and alcohol consumption.

IL18R1 rs13015714 G>T, case/controlaAdjusted ORb (95% CI); P-value


VariablesGGGTTTGT+TTGGGTTTGT+TTTT vs. (GT+GG)
Gender
  Male72/52124/13662/65186/2011.000.63 (0.40–0.97);0.69 (0.42–1.15);0.65 (0.43–0.98);0.95 (0.63–1.43);
  0.037c0.157   0.040c0.816
  Female28/3149/6028/2677/861.000.90 (0.48–1.71);1.26 (0.60–2.65);1.01 (0.55–1.83);1.34 (0.72–2.50);
0.7530.5460.9830.350
Age, years
  <6034/2265/6537/26102/911.000.57 (0.29–1.11);0.91 (0.42–1.96);0.66 (0.35–1.25);1.34 (0.73–2.47);
0.3490.2040.8030.098
  ≥6066/61108/13153/65161/1961.000.77 (0.50–1.19);0.75 (0.45–1.24);0.77 (0.51–1.15);0.88 (0.58–1.35);
0.2450.2610.1980.566
Smoking status
  Never53/6296/12258/62154/1841.000.98 (0.62–1.56);1.16 (0.69–1.95);1.04 (0.68–1.61);1.17 (0.77–1.79);
0.9380.5830.8570.464
  Ever47/2177/7432/29109/1031.000.42 (0.22–0.80);0.45 (0.21–0.95);0.43 (0.23–0.79);0.81 (0.45–1.48);
  0.008c   0.036c   0.007c0.499
Alcohol
consumption
  Never62/66113/13063/66176/1961.000.96 (0.62–1.48);1.08 (0.66–1.78);1.00 (0.66–1.51);1.16 (0.74–1.68);
0.8460.7530.9980.601
  Ever38/1760/6627/2587/911.000.38 (0.18–0.78);0.39 (0.17–0.93);0.38 (0.19–0.76);0.79 (0.40–1.54);
  0.008c   0.033c   0.006c0.485

a Genotyping was successful in 363 (95.5%) ESCC cases and 370 (97.4%) controls for IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T;

b adjusted for age, gender, smoking status and alcohol consumption (in addition to stratified factors accordingly) in a logistic regression model;

c statistically significant (P<0.05). ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; IL-18R1, interleukin-18 receptor 1; OR, odds ratio.

Table V.

Stratified analyses between the IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphism and ESCC risk by gender, age, smoking status and alcohol consumption.

Table V.

Stratified analyses between the IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphism and ESCC risk by gender, age, smoking status and alcohol consumption.

IL18RAP rs917997 C>T, case/controlaAdjusted ORb (95% CI); P-value


VariablesCCCTTTCT+TTCCCTTTCT+TTTT vs. (CT+CC)
Gender
  Male61/65120/13277/54197/1861.000.92 (0.59–1.42);1.49 (0.90–2.46);1.08 (0.72–1.63);1.58 (1.05–2.38);
0.7030.1190.701   0.029c
  Female30/2547/5929/3376/921.000.63 (0.32–1.21);0.69 (0.33–1.44);0.65 (0.35–1.21);0.94 (0.52–1.70);
0.1660.3270.1720.848
Age, years
  <6037/2562/6237/2499/861.000.59 (0.31–1.15);1.01 (0.47–2.16);0.71 (0.38–1.32);1.43 (0.77–2.65);
0.1220.9840.2770.262
  ≥6054/65105/12969/63174/1921.001.01 (0.64–1.57);1.34 (0.81–2.20);1.12 (0.73–1.70);1.33 (0.89–1.99);
0.9780.2570.6090.166
Smoking status
  Never59/61   94/12055/65149/1851.000.80 (0.51–1.25);0.82 (0.49–1.37);0.80 (0.53–1.23);0.94 (0.62–1.45);
0.3260.4410.3120.791
  Ever32/2973/7151/22124/931.000.94 (0.50–1.76);2.25 (1.07–4.74);1.24 (0.68–2.26);2.36 (1.29–4.30);
0.835   0.033c0.479   0.005c
Alcohol
consumption
  Never65/65110/12664/70174/1961.000.85 (0.55–1.31);0.85 (0.52–1.39);0.85 (0.57–1.28);0.95 (0.63–1.42);
0.4620.5230.4340.790
  Ever26/2557/6542/1799/821.000.90 (0.44–1.83);2.79 (1.19–6.54);1.27 (0.64–2.50);3.01 (1.52–5.97);
0.766   0.019c0.493   0.002c

a Genotyping was successful in 364 (95.8%) ESCC cases and 368 (96.8%) controls for IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T;

b adjusted for age, gender, smoking status and alcohol consumption (in addition to stratified factors accordingly) in a logistic regression model;

c statistically significant (P<0.05). ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; IL-18RAP, interleukin-18 receptor accessory protein; OR, odds ratio.

Associations between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and the risk of esophageal cancer lymph node metastasis

Analyses between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and risk of esophageal cancer lymph node metastasis were further conducted. No association was observed between the 4 polymorphisms and lymph node metastasis (Table VI).

Table VI.

Logistic regression analyses of associations between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and risk of esophageal cancer lymph node metastasis.

Table VI.

Logistic regression analyses of associations between IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G polymorphisms and risk of esophageal cancer lymph node metastasis.

GenotypeLN meta (+) (n=85), n (%)LN meta (−) (n=270), n (%)Crude OR (95% CI)P-valueAdjusted ORa (95% CI)P-value
IL-18 rs360719 A>G
  AA63 (75.9)185 (70.9)1.00 1.00
  AG18 (21.7)74 (28.4)0.71 (0.40–1.29)0.2630.70 (0.39–1.27)0.241
  GG2 (2.4)2 (0.8)2.94 (0.41–21.28)0.2872.66 (0.35–20.11)0.343
GG vs. AG vs. AA 0.255
  AG+GG20 (24.1)76 (29.1)0.77 (0.44–1.37)0.3750.76 (0.43–1.34)0.339
  AA+AG81 (97.6)259 (99.2)1.00 1.00
  GG2 (2.4)2 (0.8)3.20 (0.44–23.06)0.2492.91 (0.39–21.86)0.299
  G allele22 (13.3)78 (14.9)
IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T
  GG22 (26.8)73 (28.4)1.00 1.00
  GT41 (50.0)123 (47.9)1.11 (0.61–2.00)0.7391.09 (0.60–1.98)0.782
  TT19 (23.2)61 (23.7)1.03 (0.51–2.09)0.9271.04 (0.51–2.11)0.917
TT vs. GT vs. GG 0.941
  GT+TT60 (73.2)184 (71.6)1.08 (0.62–1.89)0.7821.07 (0.61–1.88)0.809
  GG+GT63 (76.8)196 (76.3)1.00 1.00
  TT19 (23.2)61 (23.7)0.97 (0.54–1.75)0.9170.98 (0.54–1.78)0.957
  T allele79 (48.2)245 (47.7)
IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T
  CC20 (24.4)61 (23.6)1.00 1.00
  CT40 (48.8)120 (46.3)1.02 (0.55–1.89)0.9580.99 (0.53–1.86)0.984
  TT22 (26.8)78 (30.1)0.86 (0.43–1.72)0.6700.84 (0.42–1.70)0.635
TT vs. CT vs. CC 0.849
  CT+TT62 (75.6)198 (76.4)0.96 (0.54–1.71)0.8760.94 (0.52–1.68)0.824
  CC+CT60 (73.2)181 (69.9)1.00 1.00
  TT22 (26.8)78 (30.1)0.85 (0.49–1.48)0.5690.85 (0.48–1.49)0.563
  T allele84 (51.2)276 (53.3)
IL-28B rs8099917 T>G
  TT75 (90.4)238 (91.2)1.00 1.00
  TG8 (9.6)21 (8.0)1.21 (0.51–2.84)0.6641.20 (0.51–2.84)0.680
  GG0 (0.0)2 (0.8)0.9900.990
GG vs. TG vs. TT 0.660
  TG+GG8 (9.6)23 (8.8)1.10 (0.47–2.57)0.8191.07 (0.46–2.51)0.872
  TT+TG83 (100)259 (99.2)1.00 1.00
  GG0 (0.0)2 (0.8)0.9900.990
  G allele8 (4.8)25 (4.8)

a Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status and alcohol consumption. LN meta, lymph node metastasis; IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-18R1, IL-18 receptor 1; IL-18RAP, IL-18 receptor accessory protein; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

In the present hospital-based case-control study of ESCC, the associations of IL-18 rs360719 A>G, IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T, IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T and IL-28B rs8099917 T>G were associated with the risk of ESCC in a high-risk Chinese population. The multivariable logistic analysis revealed that a significantly decreased risk of ESCC associated with the IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T polymorphism was evident among male patients and patients who were smokers or alcohol drinkers. In addition, a significantly increased risk of ESCC associated with the IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphism was evident among male patients and patients who were smokers or alcohol drinkers.

IL-18R is comprised of IL-18RAP and IL-18R1. Allele A of IL-18RAP rs917997 was strongly correlated with coeliac disease susceptibility (17). The IL-18RAP rs917997 A allele has a significant effect on the level of IL-18RAP mRNA expression. The IL-18RAP rs917997 C allele is strongly associated with a protective effect in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma (21). The CC genotype at the IL-18RAP locus rs917997 was associated with a protective effect against esophageal disease, which is in accordance with the present findings in the stratification analyses (21).

The frequencies of genetic polymorphisms often vary between different ethnic groups (22). In the present study, the MAF of IL-18R1 rs13015714 T was 0.511 among 380 control subjects, which is consistent with that of the Chinese Han population (0.547); however, this was significantly lower than that of the European population (0.796) and sub-Saharan African population (0.894) in the SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP). Similarly, the MAF of IL-18RAP rs917997 T was 0.496 among 380 control subjects, which is consistent with that of the Chinese Han population (0.488); however, this was significantly higher than that of the European population (0.208) and sub-Saharan African population (0.049) in the SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP).

Considering IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T mutant alleles in the control group, OR, ESCC samples and control samples, the power of the present analysis (α=0.05) was 0.679 in 258 ESCC cases and 253 controls with adjusted OR=0.65 for IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T in the male subgroup. The power of the analysis (α=0.05) was 0.932 in 156 ESCC cases and 124 controls with adjusted OR=0.43 in the smoking subgroup and 0.950 in 125 ESCC cases and 108 controls with adjusted OR=0.38 in the drinking subgroup.

For IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T, the power of the analysis (α=0.05) was 0.728 in 258 ESCC cases and 251 controls with adjusted OR=1.58 in the male subgroup, 0.937 in 156 ESCC cases and 122 controls with adjusted OR=2.36 in the smoking subgroup and 0.983 in 125 ESCC cases and 107 controls with adjusted OR=3.01 in the drinking subgroup.

Several weaknesses should be addressed in the case-control study. Firstly, all the subjects were selected from hospitals, which may have led to a bias and consequently affected the validity of the findings. Secondly, the relatively small sample size restricted the statistical power of the study, particularly in the stratification analyses. Further larger sample size studies with a well-designed two-stage fine-mapping strategy are warranted to confirm the present findings. Thirdly, due to the lack of detailed information on cancer metastasis and survival, further investigations on the potential role of IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T and IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphisms in ESCC progression and prognosis were not performed.

In conclusion, the present study provides evidence that functional IL-18R1 rs13015714 G>T and IL-18RAP rs917997 C>T polymorphisms may contribute to the development of ESCC. However, the power of the present analysis was relatively low with a limited sample size, particularly in the subgroup analyses. Therefore, only preliminary conclusions were drawn. Larger studies with other ethnic populations are required to confirm the present findings.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81101889 and 81000028), Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation (grant nos. BK2010333 and BK2011481), Social Development Foundation of Zhenjiang (grant no. SH2010017) and Changzhou Young Talents and Science-Technology Foundation of Health Bureau (grant no. QN201102). The authors would like to thank Dr Da Ding and Dr Yan Liu (Genesky Biotechnologies Inc., Shanghai, China) for the technical support.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

CI

confidence interval

IL-18

interleukin-18

OR

odds ratio

SNP

single-nucleotide polymorphism

References

1 

Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, et al: Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2010. Chin J Cancer Res. 26:48–58. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M, Rosso S, Bielska-Lasota M, Coebergh JW and Santaquilani M: EUROCARE Working group Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: Results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol. 8:773–783. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Macfarlane GJ and Boyle P: The epidemiology of oesophageal cancer in the UK and other European countries. J R Soc Med. 87:334–337. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Enzinger PC and Mayer RJ: Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 349:2241–2252. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Sun JM, Li Q, Gu HY, Chen YJ, Wei JS, Zhu Q and Chen L: Interleukin 10 rs1800872 T>G polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer in a Chinese population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:3443–3447. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Yoshimoto T, Tsutsui H, Tominaga K, Hoshino K, Okamura H, Akira S, Paul WE and Nakanishi K: IL-18, although antiallergic when administered with IL-12, stimulates IL-4 and histamine release by basophils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:13962–13966. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Galluzzi L and Kroemer G: Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses. Nat Immunol. 13:343–351. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Born TL, Thomassen E, Bird TA and Sims JE: Cloning of a novel receptor subunit, AcPL, required for interleukin-18 signaling. J Biol Chem. 273:29445–29450. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Torigoe K, Ushio S, Okura T, Kobayashi S, Taniai M, Kunikata T, Murakami T, Sanou O, Kojima H, Fujii M, et al: Purification and characterization of the human interleukin-18 receptor. J Biol Chem. 272:25737–25742. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Salcedo R, Worschech A, Cardone M, et al: MyD88-mediated signaling prevents development of adenocarcinomas of the colon: Role of interleukin 18. J Exp Med. 207:1625–1636. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Cheung H, Chen NJ, Cao Z, Ono N, Ohashi PS and Yeh WC: Accessory protein-like is essential for IL-18-mediated signaling. J Immunol. 174:5351–5357. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Sareneva T, Julkunen I and Matikainen S: IFN-alpha and IL-12 induce IL-18 receptor gene expression in human NK and T cells. J Immunol. 165:1933–1938. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zhernakova A, Festen EM, Franke L, et al: Genetic analysis of innate immunity in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis identifies two susceptibility loci harboring CARD9 and IL18RAP. Am J Hum Genet. 82:1202–1210. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Thompson SR and Humphries SE: Interleukin-18 genetics and inflammatory disease susceptibility. Genes Immun. 8:91–99. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Sánchez E, Palomino-Morales RJ, Ortego-Centeno N, Jiménez-Alonso J, González-Gay MA, López-Nevot MA, Sánchez-Román J, de Ramón E, González-Escribano MF, Pons-Estel BA, et al: Italian collaborative group: Identification of a new putative functional IL18 gene variant through an association study in systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum Mol Genet. 18:3739–3748. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Koskinen LL, Einarsdottir E, Dukes E, Heap GA, Dubois P, Korponay-Szabo IR, Kaukinen K, Kurppa K, Ziberna F, Vatta S, et al: Association study of the IL18RAP locus in three European populations with coeliac disease. Hum Mol Genet. 18:1148–1155. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Suppiah V, Moldovan M, Ahlenstiel G, Berg T, Weltman M, Abate ML, Bassendine M, Spengler U, Dore GJ, Powell E, et al: IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy. Nat Genet. 41:1100–1104. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Eurich D, Boas-Knoop S, Ruehl M, Schulz M, Carrillo ED, Berg T, Neuhaus R, Neuhaus P, Neumann UP and Bahra M: Relationship between the interleukin-28b gene polymorphism and the histological severity of hepatitis C virus-induced graft inflammation and the response to antiviral therapy after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 17:289–298. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Chen X, Li S, Yang Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Liu Y, Hu W, Jin L and Wang X: Genome-wide association study validation identifies novel loci for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Thromb Haemost. 10:1508–1514. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Babar M, Ryan AW, Anderson LA, Segurado R, Turner G, Murray LJ, Murphy SJ, Johnston BT, Comber H, Reynolds JV, et al: Genes of the interleukin-18 pathway are associated with susceptibility to Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 107:1331–1341. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Spielman RS, Bastone LA, Burdick JT, Morley M, Ewens WJ and Cheung VG: Common genetic variants account for differences in gene expression among ethnic groups. Nat Genet. 39:226–231. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2016
Volume 4 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhu J, Liu C, Teng X, Yin J, Zheng L, Wang L, Tang W, Gu H, Gu B, Chen L, Chen L, et al: Association of the interleukin-18 receptor 1 and interleukin-18 receptor accessory protein polymorphisms with the risk of esophageal cancer. Biomed Rep 4: 227-235, 2016
APA
Zhu, J., Liu, C., Teng, X., Yin, J., Zheng, L., Wang, L. ... Chen, L. (2016). Association of the interleukin-18 receptor 1 and interleukin-18 receptor accessory protein polymorphisms with the risk of esophageal cancer. Biomedical Reports, 4, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.552
MLA
Zhu, J., Liu, C., Teng, X., Yin, J., Zheng, L., Wang, L., Tang, W., Gu, H., Gu, B., Chen, L."Association of the interleukin-18 receptor 1 and interleukin-18 receptor accessory protein polymorphisms with the risk of esophageal cancer". Biomedical Reports 4.2 (2016): 227-235.
Chicago
Zhu, J., Liu, C., Teng, X., Yin, J., Zheng, L., Wang, L., Tang, W., Gu, H., Gu, B., Chen, L."Association of the interleukin-18 receptor 1 and interleukin-18 receptor accessory protein polymorphisms with the risk of esophageal cancer". Biomedical Reports 4, no. 2 (2016): 227-235. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.552