Open Access

Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy (Review)

  • Authors:
    • George Fotakopoulos
    • Vasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou
    • Ioannis G. Lempesis
    • Petros Papalexis
    • Pagona Sklapani
    • Nikolaos Trakas
    • Demetrios A. Spandidos
    • Konstantinos Faropoulos
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 25, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1666
  • Article Number: 84
  • Copyright: © Fotakopoulos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cervical myelopathy is a well‑described medulla spinalis syndrome characterized by sensory disorders, such as pain, numbness, or paresthesia in the limbs, and motor disorders, such as muscle weakness, gait difficulties, spasticity, or hyperreflexia. If left untreated, cervical myelopathy can significantly affect the quality of life of patients, while in severe cases, it can cause disability or even quadriplegia. Cervical myelopathy is the final stage of spinal cord insult and can result from transgene dysplasias of the spinal cord, and acute or chronic injuries. Spondylosis is a common, multifactor cause of cervical myelopathy and affects various elements of the spine. The development of spondylotic changes in the spine is gradual during the patient's life and the symptoms are presented at a late stage, when significant damage has already been inflicted on the spinal cord. Spondylosis is widely considered a condition affecting the middle aged and elderly. Given the fact that the population is gradually becoming older, in the near future, clinicians may have to face an increased number of patients with spondylotic myelopathy.

1. Morphology

The vertebral column is the structural base of the human body. It comprises complex bony elements (vertebrae) and soft fibrous elements (intervertebral discs and ligaments). The key anatomical parts of the vertebrae are the vertebral body, the pedicle, lamina, the spinous process and the transverse process in the thoracic and lumbar parts of the spine. The intervertebral disc is located between the vertebral bodies. The zygapophyseal and Luschka joints are the primary joints that contribute to the maintenance of the vertebral column's architecture during static position and motion. Finally, various fibrous ligaments, such as the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments and the ligamentum flavum, contribute to the maintenance of spinal cord structure. Each part of the vertebral column has unique biochemical and functional characteristics; however, they all articulate with each other in order to for the body to be able to make complex and delicate movements (1,2).

The intervertebral disc is the most critical and extensively investigated structure of the soft tissues of the vertebral column. It is placed between the un-elastic and non-compressed bodies of the vertebrae and sustains multi-direction compressive, bending, or shearing forces (1,2) during body motion or posture sustenance. However, the acting forces over the spine are not distributed equally over the intervertebral discs, leading to more significant wear of the most stressed parts of the disc. The reasons for that are some anatomical characteristics of intervertebral disc components (e.g., eccentric location of nucleus pulposus in the disc) and the fact that the spine sustains multi-direction loads (3).

The intervertebral disc is separated into two parts: The outer part is the annulus fibrosus, while the inner part is the nucleus pulposus. Furthermore, the annulus fibrosus is subdivided into an external zone consisting of complex collagen type I fibers and an internal area composed of soft collagen type II fibers (1,2). The external zone of the annulus fibrosus bridges two successive vertebral bodies. In addition, due to its architecture and biochemical characteristics, the annulus fibrosus functions similar to a diffusion filter that controls the crossing of fluids, ions and macromolecules between articular plates and intervertebral discs (4).

The nucleus pulposus is a gel-like formation composed mainly of glycosaminoglycans and water (1,2). It is located approximately in the middle of the distance between the central and posterior parts of the intervertebral disc (5). In the case that a static compressive load is forced on the intervertebral disc, the nucleus pulposus loses some of its water content and its height is reduced. When the pressure from this load is terminated, the nucleus pulposus retains the lost moisture and regains its original size. In the case that a shear load is inflicted on the intervertebral disc, the nucleus pulposus can move inside the annulus fibrosus, consuming the load. The nucleus pulposus retains its original location inside the disc when the pressure of the load is terminated.

This difference in the biochemical structure of the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus is fundamental to their unique functionality. Thus, the annulus fibrosus, with its high content of fibers, serves to stand tension, shear and torsion, while the nucleus pulposus, with its high content of proteoglycans, serves to stand compression forces (6-8). In conclusion, the intervertebral disc acts functions as an elastic jolt absorber under multi-axial loads.

Two continuous vertebrae are linked with a pair of joints known as the zygapophyseal. These are accurate joints containing articular plates, articular cartilage and synovial tissue, and bridge the faceting process of two continuous vertebrae. Apart from their connecting role, zygapophyseal joints participate in the motions of the spine and sustain a part of the loads that act over the spine. Similar to intervertebral discs, zygapophysial joints are designed to sustain multi-axial compressive (9) and shear (10,11) loads. Additionally, zygapophyseal joints stabilize other parts of the spine's soft tissues, particularly the upper vertebral column (12).

On the lateral side of the cervical intervertebral disc, the annulus fibrosus is subdivided by transverse clefts (13,14). These clefts are not anatomical formations that exist in the fetus, but develop later in the child's life and become more profound in adulthood (15,16). Later on in adult life, a joint pseudocapsule is formed inside the fissures (1,2), and the formed joint is known as the uncovertebral or Luschka joint (13,14). However, the exact formation mechanism of these fissures remains to be determined. In various models, it has been found that the clefts are formed in the intervertebral disc area, where the highest load pressure acts (12,17,18). On the contrary, the role of Luschka joints is well known. They cooperate with facet joints to perform lateral bending and axial spine rotation (19). Furthermore, Luschka joints restrict extreme movements of the spine (7,20), avoiding possible damage.

Finally, various fibrous ligaments connect two or more continuous elements of the vertebral column. These ligaments are generally high-percentage elastin and collagen structures and are designed to resist tensile and destructive loads (7). Their exact function depends on their biochemical characteristics and the spinal parts they connect. Ligaments with a high concentration of elastin have a more elastic function (21,22), whereas ligaments with a high percentage of collagen have a more stabilizing role. Furthermore, the complex entheses of spine ligaments render them capable of resisting multiple loads, although they are most effective when distracted along the direction of the fibers (23). The critical ligaments of the spine are described below:

The anterior longitudinal ligament is located on the ventral side of the spinal cord and binds the bodies of the vertebrae. Due to its location, the anterior longitudinal ligament limits the extension of the spine (23).

The posterior longitudinal ligament binds the dorsal part of the vertebral bodies. Due to its caudal location, it limits the flexion of the spine. On the other hand, as the posterior longitudinal ligament is located close to the center of rotation, it is not as effective against loads during rotation (12).

Interspinous ligaments connect the vertebral processes of the spine. Mainly, they are composed of collagen fibers, as 5-20% of them are comprised of collagen (24,25). Therefore, their main role is to limit the flexion of the vertebral column (25). Additionally, these ligaments cooperate with the anterior longitudinal ligament and resist the applied forces during rotation.

The ligamentum flavum is located in the posterior part of the laminae. It is the most elastic tissue of the body, with a collagen/elastin ratio of 1/4 (26,27). Its main role is to maintain the vertical posture of the spine and assist the vertebral column in resuming it after flexion.

Capsular ligaments connect the inferior articular process of a vertebra with the superior process of the lower vertebra (28). They serve as local stabilizers of the zygapophyseal joint (28,29), particularly during rotation (28).

2. Pathophysiology

Intervertebral discs, joints and ligaments have a poor or absent feeding vascular network. As a result, the nutrition of the intervertebral discs is covered mainly through a vascular network that penetrates only to the outer zone of the annulus fibrosus and through diffusion from vertebral end plates (30). Additionally, fluids and elements of nutrition enter the intervertebral disc during the movements of the spine. When the disc is compressed, it loses water through a mechanism which is discussed below. When the compression stops, the disc retains its original height, absorbing fluids and nutrients with a mechanism similar to a pump.

This lack of blood vessels inside the nucleus pulposus, the inner part of the annulus fibrosus and the articular cartilage does not only have negative effects. The architecture of the aforementioned structures appears to be more solid without penetrating vessels, rendering them more effective in resisting loads (31).

The harmonic cooperation of the vertebrae, the intervertebral discs, the small joints and the ligaments renders the vertebral column capable of sustaining multiple external forces, such as compression, shear and rotation during the static or dynamic posture of the body. Additionally, it contributes to maintaining the architectural integrity and functionality of the vertebral column during and after the force stops acting.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)

Cervical myelopathy is a well-described medulla spinalis syndrome characterized by sensory disorders, such as pain, numbness, or paresthesia in the limbs, as well as motor disorders, such as muscle weakness, gait difficulties, spasticity, or hyperreflexia. Pathologically, myelopathy is characterized by atrophy of the anterior horn (32) and loss of the neurons in the gray matter, with accompanying cavity formation within the gray matter. By contrast, in white matter, demyelination, necrosis (33), myelin pallor,and atrophy can be encountered (33,34). A summary of the underlying causes, mechanisms and consequences of this condition is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Cervical myelopathy can result from transgene dysplasias of the spinal cord, acute insults, such as trauma or ischemia, and chronic issues such as infections and age-related degeneration of the spinal cord. Spondylosis is a multifactorial (genetic deformation, aging deterioration and loading history) (35) cause of cervical myelopathy and affects various elements of the spine like vertebrae, intervertebral discs, joints and ligaments. Spondylosis is characterized by multi-type vertebral column deformations, such as the formation of bony spurs, the degeneration of facet and Luschka joints (32), the calcification of soft tissues and ligaments, and the degeneration of the intervertebral disc. The outcome of all these deformations is a profoundly narrow spinal canal (36,37), which causes direct pressure on the medulla spinalis. Additionally, it has been shown that the chronic degeneration of the spine causes the static compression of the spinal medulla. The dynamic compression that occurs during the movements of the spine can cause cervical myelopathy (38,39). Finally, ischemic deterioration appears to be induced during aging and contributes to the development of myelopathy (33,34).

Spondylosis is widely considered a condition affecting middle-aged individuals; 95% of asymptomatic males and 70% of asymptomatic males by the age of 60-65 years have signs of degeneration in cervical radiography (38), and 57% of asymptomatic individuals >40 years of age have disc degeneration, while 40% of the individuals in the same age group have bone spurs in a cervical MRI (40), whereas only 10% of individuals by the age of 25 have spondylotic deformations (41).

Age deterioration

During the first years of life, the vertebral column is at the peak of its morphological integrity and functionality. As the years progress, a number of age-related changes occur in the spine. These changes, along with spinal deformations which occur due to acting loads, disrupt the architecture of the vertebral column and deteriorate its functionality.

The intervertebral disc, as aforementioned, is an avascular structure that meets its needs for fluids and macromolecules through the vascular network of the outer annulus fibrosus and diffusion from the surrounding tissues. More specifically, when a load compresses the disc, water is drained out, increasing the osmotic pressure inside the disc and decreasing the height of the disc. When the load stops acting, the high osmotic pressure in the disc drives the lost amount of water back to the nucleus pulposus and the disc back to its original height. The disc of a young individual contains an increased number of proteoglycans and only a small amount of fiber, and thus it has an enhanced ability to absorb water. In summary, during youth, the biochemical structure and the proper function of the intervertebral disc, in combination with the integrity of the annulus fibrosus vascular network, guarantee the proper supplementation of the disc (31).

During aging, the biochemical composition (42) and the architecture of the intervertebral disc change significantly. The biochemical changes involve the shift of chondroitin-4-sulfate, chondroitin-6-sulfate and keratan sulfate, which are the main glycosaminoglycans in the intervertebral disc of a young individual, to dermatan sulfate (31). The changes which occur in the glycosaminoglycans, and amounts and quality of proteins I the disc during aging reduce the quantity of water inside the disc.

As a result, the disc height is reduced (1) and it becomes an unelastic and fibrous structure (41). Additionally, melanin-like molecules are collected inside the nucleus pulposus, and the disc thus acquires a dark brown shade (43). Architectural changes occur in the first years of adult life. They involve multiple tears and fissures that develop on the lateral surface of the annulus fibrosus and progressively extend to the nucleus pulposus (1,44). Due to its biochemical and structural changes, these gap formations result from the reduced capacity of the disc to carry loads (44).

Furthermore, nutrient supply to the avascular disc becomes less efficient in a spine from an older individual. As a result, the poorly supplied intervertebral disc has a low regeneration rate. This fact reduces the ability of the disc to repair the damage from mechanical loads (45).

The aging procedure affects the intervertebral disc and the surrounding cartilage formations. Namely, the amount of proteoglycans in cartilage is reduced over time (46), reducing the ability of the cartilage to maintain an adequate amount of water, and making it less elastic. Additionally, the connection between the collagen fibers alone (47) and the collagen and sugar molecules become tighter, increasing the inelasticity of the spine.

In summary, during the first years of adulthood, intervertebral discs and the surrounding cartilage domains become stiffer, the height of the disc decreases, and the amount of water inside the disc is reduced, rendering the poorly supplied disc unable to sustain multi-direction loads (35). The changes described above, which are early deteriorations observed over the spine, are known as intervertebral chondrosis (1).

In the following years of adult life, more deteriorated detriments accumulate over the spinal cord. During this stage, the percentage of intra-disc water is further reduced, causing a significant downside to the intervertebral disc compared with the stage of intervertebral chondrosis (1). In addition, the nucleus pulposus and the internal part of the annulus fibrosus are the most affected during this stage. By contrast, the outer part of the annulus fibrosus is less affected. As a result, internal part of the disc prolapses through the healthier outer part of the annulus fibrosus (1).

Apart from the intervertebral disc, cartilage and spongiosa are affected at this stage. The reason is that the degenerated disc does not function sufficiently, and some acting loads are forced onto the adjacent structures of the disc. This causes a disorder of the natural architecture of the cartilage endplates and the formation of ossification, while the vertebral spongiosa becomes sclerotic and thicker (1). This second stage of spinal degeneration is termed intervertebral osteochondrosis.

As aforementioned, the intervertebral disc is an avascular formation. Nonetheless, during the aging procedure, newly formed blood vessels penetrate the nucleus pulposus through the tears of the annulus fibrosus or the end plates of the vertebrae (48,49). The exact mechanism of the deployment of blood vessels remains to be determined. High-quantity glycosaminoglycan formations, such as intervertebral discs resist the deployment of new vessels. During aging, the quantity of glycosaminoglycans is reduced in the intervertebral disc, allowing them to penetrate new vessels. Angiogenesis may be a potential repair mechanism of the spine for age-related degeneration (31) or the outcome of reduced levels of glycosaminoglycans. The only confirmed fact is that the penetration of blood vessels inside the nucleus pulposus changes its structure. The expression of metalloproteinases near the newly developed vessels of the intervertebral disc can contribute to these changes (50).

All the age-related changes in the architecture of the vertebral column described above affect its stability and efficiency in resisting forces during standing or body movements. The degenerated intervertebral disc cannot stand the loads during acting, inflicting an increased load stress on the adjacent articular cartilage of vertebrae and their end plates (44). To reduce the instability of the spine, multiple bony particles (osteophytes) are formed (51) at the edge of the vertebrae. Lamellar bone covers osteophytes, which have spongiosa similar to that of the vertebrae (52). These osteophytes increase the area of the area that sustains the compression and make the arthrosis more stable. Spondylosis deformations enhance this effect, and osteophytes are common in the more mobile cranial part of the cervical spine. At the same time, they are uncommon in the caudal part (53,54).

While the formation of osteophytes is a well-known defense mechanism to stabilize degenerated arthrosis, the exact mechanism of osteophyte formation is controversial. Schmorl's first model postulates that the fissures and tears in the outer zone of the annulus fibrosus make the intervertebral disc complex, and the nearby vertebral bodies more unstable and susceptible to pathological movements. The outcome of these movements is that the anterior longitudinal ligament sustains an increasing load, which is transferred to ligament insertions on the surface of vertebral bodies. Additionally, the intervertebral disc presses the anterior longitudinal ligament during these movements, increasing the tension at the ligament insertions. The outcome of this continuous stress is the formation of osteophytes at the insertions of the anterior longitudinal ligament (55). The second model, described by Collins (56), proposes that the fissures and tears in the outer zone of the annulus fibrosus are the ports through which tissue from the degenerated disc penetrates out of the nucleus puplosus. During this time, the collected penetrating disc tissue near the vertebrae edges is ossified, resulting in the formation of vertebrae body osteophytes (56). In summary, both models propose that the anterior longitudinal ligament plays a key role in the formation of osteophytes. This is unusual, considering that the common location where osteophytes are formed is the ventral surface of the vertebrae just caudally to the vertebrae edges, a location where the anterior longitudinal ligament is not sufficiently strong (53).

The sum of all age-related spine deformations affects not only the intervertebral disc, but also the joints of the spinal cord. Osteochondrosis of the vertebral end plates and intervertebral discs alters the segmentation of the acting loads (44). In addition, the joint is forced to participate in a greater range of movements (57) due to the instability caused by the degeneration of the spine (51). These structural changes, combined with hypermobility, are believed to induce the formation of tears in cartilage and osteoarthritis-like deformation of the facet joints. Additionally, intense sclerosis is found in the subchondral formations, while the final step of degeneration is the hyalinization of the zygapophyseal joints and the formation of osteophytes (52).

Furthermore, due to the change in load segmentation, uncovertebral processes and Luschka joints are forced to resist higher forces (44), resulting in the flattening of uncovertebral processes (1,44). The load segmentation change, in combination with the flattening of uncovertebral processes, increasing the load on the articular cartilage and the adjacent end plate of the vertebrae (44), inflicting further damage to these structures. Additionally, the flatter uncovertebral processes are a potential place for osteophyte formation (52). These osteophytes can grow in the direction of the transverse foramen and compress the vertebral artery, particularly during extreme neck movements, causing severe hypoperfusion to the cervical part of the medulla spinalis (58).

Finally, the overgrowing osteophytes can compress the ligamentum flavum, bending it and making it harder (59). This bent ligamentum flavum can inflict direct pressure on the medulla spinalis and the vertebral artery, causing lesions to the spinal cord due to pressure or hypoperfusion.

Canal size

The medulla spinalis is a delicate neural formation inside a protective cage known as the spinal canal of the vertebral column. The size of the spinal canal differs along the spinal cord or among the sexes (males appear to have a wider canal in all the cervical segments compared with females) (60). The wider part is located in the lumbar spine, while the diameter of the spinal canal is reduced when during cranial movements. The anteroposterior diameter of the canal between C3 and C7 segments has been reported to be 17-18 mm (61,62), while other reports have demonstrated a decrease to the considered normal sagittal diameter of the canal to 14.1±1.6 and 13.73±1.37 mm (60,63).

Various researchers have reported that spinal canal stenosis is a key factor predisposing to the development of the direct compression of the medulla spinalis and cervical myelopathy (38,63,64). The fact that individuals with congenital canal stenosis are more susceptible to cervical myelopathy (65,66) supports this theory. Moreover, the size of the cervical canal is considerably reduced in patients with cervical myelopathy compared with healthy individuals (37,67). By contrast, myelopathy symptoms are more severe in patients with a considerably decreased canal size (63). Direct measurements in patients and cadavers have demonstrated that a compromise of the canal's acreage <60 mm2 (68) or the canal's sagittal diameter <13 mm (69) is associated with an increased possibility of developing cervical myelopathy (37,44). On the other hand, individuals with a canal diameter between 13 and 17 mm have a reduced possibility of developing myelopathy. However, they can still present signs of cervical spondylosis, and individuals with a canal diameter >17 mm will not develop cervical spondylosis (37).

Spondylosis, as aforementioned, is the spinal cord's normal aging procedure and includes a group of changes, such as the deterioration of the intravertebral disc, the hypertrophy and ossification of the spine's ligaments, and the formation of osteophytic spurs (32,70). These changes compromise the size of the spinal canal, inflicting direct pressure on the medulla. Chronic pressure is a predisposing factor for developing CSM (32,44,70). Moreover, when spondylosis and congenitally narrowed canals coexist, the possibility of developing CSM increases (44).

Dynamic compression

Although the model described above appears sufficient, it fails to explain the onset of myelopathy in patients with minimal compromise of the spinal canal and the absence of symptoms in healthy individuals with spinal canal stenosis (71,72). Moreover, cervical myelopathy increases in incidence in individuals with extreme or unphysiological neck movements (64,71,73-75). Subsequently, static compression of the medulla from spondylotic formations does not appear to be the unique pathophysiological model that describes spondylotic myelopathy.

To explain that paradox, the motion physiology of the spinal cord needs to be studied. During normal flexion and extension, the morphology of the spine is altered, affecting the diameter of the spinal canal (76,77). In flexion, the spinal canal is elongated, and the spinal cord is stretched, inducing axial tension (72,76). Typically, the cervical and lumbar spine are the most mobile parts of the spinal cord; thus, it is logical that the white and grey matter of these spine parts are stressed the most (78,79). In extension, the spinal canal is narrowed due to the shingling of the laminae and buckling of the ligamentum flavum, while the spinal cord itself becomes shorter and thicker (42,76). Additionally, during a shift from flexion to extension, the bulging of the intervertebral discs and ligamentum flavum decreases the diameter of the spinal canal (80). Moreover, the canal is compressed by intervertebral discs and ligamentum flavum bulging when a load is inflicted upon the spinal cord. These modifications of the architecture of the spine during motion inflict direct pressure on the cervical medulla (81), and are predisposing factors for the development of CSM. The observation advocates the theory that extreme cervical spine movements are associated with progressive CSM (73-75). An additional supporting argument is that surgical decompression and stabilization of the spine, which decrease the pressure over the cord and eliminate the abnormal motion, improve the clinical status of patients with CSM (82-85).

Of note, age-related degenerative changes in the spine exacerbate the dynamic compression of the cord. In flexion, the spinal cord can be farther stretched over anterior osteophytes or calcified herniated discs, while in extension, the buckling ligamentum flavum compresses the cord (69,86). As previously demonstrated in a clinical protocol, the cord's compression during motion by ventral osteophytes can induce chronic stretching and shear injury to the dorsal cord (87). This fact supports the theory that dynamic compression, in combination with spondylosis, is a predisposal factor for developing CSM. Moreover, age-related changes in the spine can induce cord pressure and, consequently, CSM through local tethering action. In individuals with no spondylosis, the strain during motion of the vertebral column is split over the entire spinal cord. By contrast, in individuals with spondylotic deformation, the strain is focused adjacent to age-related formations (72). A potential explanation is that spine ligaments induce tethering stress over the cord in areas near spondylotic deformations during flexion and extension (72).

Ischemia

The notion that ischemia contributes to the development of CSM is not a new one, but remains controversial. Numerous protocols support this theory. Specifically, the anterior spinal artery and parenchymal arterioles present pathological changes, such as vessel wall thickening and hyalinization (88,89). By contrast, radicular artery diameter is affected by the fibrosis of intervertebral foramina in patients with CSM (90). Additionally, histopathological clues of ischemic injury over the grey and white matter of the spine have been observed in patients with CSM (76,91).

A pathophysiologic explanation is that time-related degenerative formations of the cervical spine can compress major feeding arteries such as the vertebral arteries (33), the anterior spinal artery and its ventral branches, or the radicular arteries of the neuroforamina (73,89). As a result, the blood flow velocity within the vertebral artery can be abnormally reduced (92), while blood perfusion to vital parts of the spinal cord is compromised (93). Moreover, spondylotic deformities can compress the venous outflow of the spine, reducing blood drainage from the spine (73,89). Various studies on humans and animals support this hypothesis. The outcome of a canine study where terminal branches of the anterior spinal artery and penetrating branches of the lateral pial plexus are curved and stretched around degenerative formations of the spine was a decrease in blood flow to corticospinal tracts (94). Additionally, angiography studies on animal models suffering from CSM have revealed signs of ischemia (95,96). Other researchers have examined the simultaneous insult of direct compression and ischemia to the cord. In detail, ischemia appears to enhance the injury due to the anterior compression over the medulla (94), changing blood flow to the spinal cord (97). In this protocol, corticospinal tracts are the most affected part of the medulla (94), which has also been found in patients with CSM (69). In another experimental protocol, the direct compression of specific spine arteries causes a decrease in blood flow to the respective artery's feeding part of the spine (98).

On the other hand, there are some clinical and experimental protocols that fail to associate ischemia with CSM. In detail, patients or laboratory animals with moderate CSM have no (99) or only mild signs of ischemia (100,101). By contrast, pathological evidence of ischemia has only been found when severe canal stenosis coexists (102,103). Moreover, some experimental studies have only found minor changes in blood flow during compression and decompression (79,104).

3. Conclusion

Spondylosis is a multi-factor cause of cervical myelopathy. The onset of CSM-related symptoms is insidious and if left untreated, it can cause severe disability in affected patients. Given the fact that spondylotic changes take time to be developed and that the population is gradually becoming older, CSM will be one of the most common health issues among elderly patients in the future. A better understanding of the mechanism that drives to the formation of spondylotic changes will aid in the development of more effective treatment and preventive strategies.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

GF and KF conceptualized the study. IGL, VEG, PP, NT, PS, GF, KF and DAS made a substantial contribution to the interpretation and analysis of the literature data to be include in the review, and wrote and prepared the draft of the manuscript. GF and KF analyzed the data from the literature for inclusion in the review and provided critical revisions. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

DAS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Prescher A: Anatomy and pathology of the aging spine. Eur J Radiol. 27:181–195. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Nguyen C, Sanchez K, Roren A, Palazzo C, Falcou L, Drapé JL, Rannou F, Poiraudeau S and Lefèvre-Colau MM: Anatomical specificities of the degenerated cervical spine: A narrative review of clinical implications, with special focus on targeted spinal injections. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 59:276–281. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Maiman DJ and Yoganandan N: Biomechanics of cervical spine trauma. In: Clinical neurosurgery. Black P (ed). Vol 97. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp543-570, 1991.

4 

Neidlinger-Wilke C, Würtz K, Liedert A, Schmidt C, Börm W, Ignatius A, Wilke HJ and Claes L: A three-dimensional collagen matrix as a suitable culture system for the comparison of cyclic strain and hydrostatic pressure effects on intervertebral disc cells. J Neurosurg Spine. 2:457–465. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Seipelt H, Griefahn B and Wiersbitzky H: Calcinosis of intervertebral disks-relatively rare, heterogenous and mostly benign. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 81:603–605. 1987.PubMed/NCBI(In German).

6 

Yasuma T, Suzuki F, Koh S and Yamauchi Y: Pathological changes in the cartilaginous plates in relation to intervertebral disc lesions. Acta Pathol Jpn. 38:735–750. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

White AA and Panjabi MM: Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edition. J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA, 1990.

8 

Ratish S, Gao ZX, Prasad HM, Pei Z and Bijendra D: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar spine surgery for lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spine stenosis: Emphasizing on clinical outcomes of transforaminal technique. Surg Sci. 9:63–84. 2018.

9 

Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N and Pintar FA: Posterior complex contribution to the axial compressive and distraction behavior of the cervical spine. J Musculoskeletal Res. 2:257–265. 1998.

10 

Onan OA, Heggeness MH and Hipp JA: A motion analysis of the cervical facet joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 23:430–439. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Jonas R, Demmelmaier R and Wilke HJ: Influences of functional structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine. Spine J. 20:2014–2024. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Yoganandan N, Kumaresan S and Pintar FA: Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 16:1–27. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N and Pintar FA: Methodology to quantify the uncovertebral joint in the human cervical spine. J Musculoskeletal Res. 1:1–9. 1997.

14 

Sherk HH, Dunn EJ, Eismont FJ, Fielding JW, Long DM, Ono K, Penning L and Raynor R: The cervical spine, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1989.

15 

Bland JH: Luschka's Joint. Arch Intern Med. 116(635)1965.

16 

Hayashi K and Yabuki T: Origin of the uncus and of Luschka's joint in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 67:788–791. 1985.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Hattori S, Oda H and Kawai S: Cervical intradiscal pressure in movements and traction of the cervical spine. Z Orthop. 119:568–569. 1981.

18 

Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke HJ and Claes LE: Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery. 44:379–385. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Nagamoto Y, Ishii T, Iwasaki M, Sakaura H, Moritomo H, Fujimori T, Kashii M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H and Sugamoto K: Three-dimensional motion of the uncovertebral joint during head rotation. J Neurosurg Spine. 17:327–333. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Wolfla CE: Adult and child and neck anatomy. In: Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Larson SJ and Sances A (eds). Frontiers in head and neck trauma: Clinical and biomechanical. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp18-33, 1998.

21 

Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Butler J, Reinartz J, Sances A Jr and Larson SJ: Dynamic response of human cervical spine ligaments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 14:1102–1110. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Yoganandan N, Kumaresan S and Pintar FA: Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J Biomech Eng. 122:623–629. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Myklebust JB, Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Cusick JF, Maiman D, Myers TJ and Sances A Jr: Tensile strength of spinal ligaments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 13:526–531. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ohara Y: Ossification of the ligaments in the cervical spine, including ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 29:63–68. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Barros EMKP, Rodrigues CJ, Rodrigues NR, Oliveira RP, Barros TEP and Rodrigues AJ Jr: Aging of the elastic and collagen fibers in the human cervical interspinous ligaments. Spine J. 2:57–62. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Yahia LH, Garzon S, Strykowski H and Rivard CH: Ultrastructure of the human interspinous ligament and ligamentum flavum. A preliminary study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 15:262–268. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Yong-Hing K, Reilly J and Kirkaldy-Willis WH: The ligamentum flavum. Spine. 1:226–234. 1976.

28 

Goel VK, Clark CR, McGowan D and Goyal S: An in-vitro study of the kinematics of the normal, injured and stabilized cervical spine. J Biomech. 17:363–376. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Zdeblick TA, Abitbol JJ, Kunz DN, McCabe RP and Garfin S: Cervical stability after sequential capsule resection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 18:2005–2008. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

De Geer CM: Intervertebral disk nutrients and transport mechanisms in relation to disk degeneration: A narrative literature review. J Chiropr Med. 17:97–105. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Walsh DA: Angiogenesis in osteoarthritis and spondylosis: Successful repair with undesirable outcomes. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 16:609–615. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Tracy JA and Bartleson JD: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist. 16:176–187. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

McCormack BM and Weinstein PR: Cervical spondylosis. An update. West J Med. 165:43–51. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H, Takahashi HE and Ikuta F: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 21:827–833. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Adams MA and Dolan P: Spine biomechanics. J Biomech. 38:1972–1983. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M and Ito K: Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J. 14:27–35. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Morishita Y, Naito M, Hymanson H, Miyazaki M, Wu G and Wang JC: The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 18:877–883. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Gore DR: Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: A ten-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26:2463–2466. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Kuwazawa Y, Pope MH, Bashir W, Takahashi K and Smith FW: The length of the cervical cord: effects of postural changes in healthy volunteers using positional magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 31:E579–E583. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS and Wiesel S: Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72:1178–1184. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Shedid D and Benzel EC: Cervical spondylosis anatomy: Pathophysiology and biomechanics. Neurosurgery. 60 (1 Supp1 1):S7–S13. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Rao R: Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: Pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84:1872–1881. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Tang X, Jing L, Richardson WJ, Isaacs RE, Fitch RD, Brown CR, Erickson MM, Setton LA and Chen J: Identifying molecular phenotype of nucleus pulposus cells in human intervertebral disc with aging and degeneration. J Orthop Res. 34:1316–1326. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Baptiste DC and Fehlings MG: Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 6 (6 Suppl):190S–197S. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Horner HA and Urban JP: 2001 Volvo award winner in basic science studies: Effect of nutrient supply on the viability of cells from the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26:2543–2549. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Bayliss MT, Hutton S, Hayward J and Maciewicz RA: Distribution of aggrecanase (ADAMts 4/5) cleavage products in normal and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage: The influence of age, topography, and zone of tissue. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 9:553–560. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Duance VC, Crean JK, Sims TJ, Avery N, Smith S, Menage J, Eisenstein SM and Roberts S: Changes in collagen cross-linking in degenerative disc disease and scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 23:2545–2551. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Brown MF, Hukkanen MV, McCarthy ID, Redfern DR, Batten JJ, Crock HV, Hughes SP and Polak JM: Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the vertebral endplate in patients with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 79:147–153. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Freemont AJ, Watkins A, Le Maitre C, Baird P, Jeziorska M, Knight MT, Ross ER, O'Brien JP and Hoyland JA: Nerve growth factor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc. J Pathol. 197:286–292. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Roberts S, Caterson B, Menage J, Evans EH, Jaffray DC and Eisenstein SM: Matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase: Their role in disorders of the human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25:3005–3013. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Carette S and Fehlings MG: Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 353:392–399. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Llopis E, Belloch E, León JP, Higueras V and Piquer J: The degenerative cervical spine. Radiologia. 58 (Suppl 1):S13–S25. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In English, Spanish).

53 

Pesch HJ, Becker T, Bischoff W and Seibold H: ‘Physiological osteoporosis’ and ‘osteoblast insufficiency’ in old age. Comparative radiological-morphometric and statistical studies on the spongy bone of lumbar and cervical vertebral bodies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 110:1–14. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Ferrara LA: The biomechanics of cervical spondylosis. Adv Orthop. 2012(493605)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Palanca M, Ruspi ML, Cristofolini L, Liebsch C, Villa T, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F, Wilke HJ and La Barbera L: The strain distribution in the lumbar anterior longitudinal ligament is affected by the loading condition and bony features: An in vitro full-field analysis. PLoS One. 15(e0227210)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Collins DH: The pathology of the articular and spinal diseases. Edward Arnold, London, 1949.

57 

Arlet V and Aebi M: Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: Present understanding and future perspectives. Eur Spine J. 22 (Suppl 2):S276–S295. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Braun IF, Pinto RS, De Filipp GJ, Lieberman A, Pasternack P and Zimmerman RD: Brain stem infarction due to chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. South Med J. 76:1507–1510. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Muthukumar N: Ossification of the ligamentum flavum as a result of fluorosis causing myelopathy: Report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 56(E622)2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Lee MJ, Cassinelli EH and Riew KD: Prevalence of cervical spine stenosis. Anatomic study in cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89:376–380. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Matsunaga S, Nakamura K, Seichi A, Yokoyama T, Toh S, Ichimura S, Satomi K, Endo K, Yamamoto K, Kato Y, et al: Radiographic predictors for the development of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A multicenter cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33:2648–2650. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Bohlman HH: Cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Instr Course Lect. 44:81–97. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

63 

Edwards WC and LaRocca H: The developmental segmental sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 8:20–27. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Hayashi H, Okada K, Hamada M, Tada K and Ueno R: Etiologic factors of myelopathy. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 200–209. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

65 

Schmidt MH, Quinones-Hinojosa A and Rosenberg WS: Cervical myelopathy associated with degenerative spine disease and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Semin Neurol. 22:143–148. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Houten JK and Cooper PR: Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery. 52:1081–1078. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

67 

Miura J, Doita M, Miyata K, Marui T, Nishida K, Fujii M and Kurosaka M: Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 22:8–13. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Cooper PR and Epstein F: Radical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults. Recent experience in 29 patients. J Neurosurg. 63:492–499. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Fehlings MG and Skaf G: A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 23:2730–2737. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Debois V, Herz R, Berghmans D, Hermans B and Herregodts P: Soft cervical disc herniation. Influence of cervical spinal canal measurements on development of neurologic symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 24:1996–2002. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Albert TJ and Vacarro A: Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 23:2738–2745. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Henderson FC, Geddes JF, Vaccaro AR, Woodard E, Berry KJ and Benzel EC: Stretch-associated injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: New concept and review. Neurosurgery. 56:1101–1113. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

73 

Matz PG, Pritchard PR and Hadley MN: Anterior cervical approach for the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 60 (1 Supp1 1):S64–S70. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Ferguson RJ and Caplan LR: Cervical spondylitic myelopathy. Neurol Clin. 3:373–382. 1985.PubMed/NCBI

75 

Muhle C, Metzner J, Weinert D, Schön R, Rautenberg E, Falliner A, Brinkmann G, Mehdorn HM, Heller M and Resnick D: Kinematic MR imaging in surgical management of cervical disc disease, spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Radiol. 40:146–153. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Kimura M, Ito K, Onizuka J, Hirayama M and Kuriyama M: Cervical spinal cord infarction in a patient with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion and cervical spondylosis. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 37:927–929. 1997.(In Japanese).

77 

Otani K, Sato K, Yabuki S, Iwabuchi M and Kikuchi S: A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 34:268–273. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Polak-Kraśna K, Robak-Nawrocka S, Szotek S, Czyż M, Gheek D and Pezowicz C: The denticulate ligament-tensile characterisation and finite element micro-scale model of the structure stabilising spinal cord. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 91:10–17. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

79 

Ichihara K, Taguchi T, Sakuramoto I, Kawano S and Kawai S: Mechanism of the spinal cord injury and the cervical spondylotic myelopathy: New approach based on the mechanical features of the spinal cord white and gray matter. J Neurosurg. 99 (3 Suppl):278–285. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Zeng C, Xiong J, Wang JC, Inoue H, Tan Y, Tian H and Aghdasi B: The evaluation and observation of ‘Hidden’ hypertrophy of cervical ligamentum flavum, cervical canal, and related factors using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Global Spine J. 6:155–163. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Chen CJ, Hsu HL, Niu CC, Chen TY, Chen MC, Tseng YC, Wong YC and Wang LJ: Cervical degenerative disease at flexion-extension MR imaging: Prediction criteria. Radiology. 227:136–142. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

82 

Maurer PK, Ellenbogen RG, Ecklund J, Simonds GR, van Dam B and Ondra SL: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Treatment with posterior decompression and Luque rectangle bone fusion. Neurosurgery. 28:680–684. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

83 

Lau D, Winkler EA, Than KD, Chou D and Mummaneni PV: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Influence of cervical alignment on outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 27:508–517. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

84 

Park Y, Maeda T, Cho W and Riew KD: Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: Sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification. Spine J. 10:193–199. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

85 

Kim PK and Alexander JT: Indications for circumferential surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 6 (Suppl 6):299S–307S. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

86 

Panjabi M and White A III: Biomechanics of nonacute cervical spinal cord trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 13:838–842. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

87 

Smart KM, Blake C, Staines A, Thacker M and Doody C: Mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain: Part 2 of 3: Symptoms and signs of peripheral neuropathic pain in patients with low back (± leg) pain. Man Ther. 17:345–351. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

88 

Tu J, Vargas Castillo J, Das A and Diwan AD: Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Insights into its pathobiology and molecular mechanisms. J Clin Med. 10(1214)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

89 

Dohle E, Beardall S, Chang A, Mena KPC, Jovanović L, Nath U, Lee KS, Smith AH, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Touzet AY, et al: Human spinal cord tissue is an underutilised resource in degenerative cervical myelopathy: Findings from a systematic review of human autopsies. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 165:1121–1131. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

90 

Lestini WF and Wiesel SW: The pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 69–93. 1989.PubMed/NCBI

91 

Lee WH, Lee SU and Jung SH: Ischemic cervical myelopathy caused by vertebral artery dissection: The clinical utility of a motor-evoked potential study. Neurologist. 21:8–10. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

92 

Strek P, Reroń E, Maga P, Modrzejewski M and Szybist N: A possible correlation between vertebral artery insufficiency and degenerative changes in the cervical spine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 255:437–440. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

93 

Hashizume Y, Iijima S, Kishimoto H and Yanagi T: Pathology of spinal cord lesions caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Acta Neuropathol. 63:123–130. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

94 

Gooding MR, Wilson CB and Hoff JT: Experimental cervical myelopathy. Effects of ischemia and compression of the canine cervical spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 43:9–17. 1975.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Wilson CB, Bertan V, Norrell HA Jr and Hukuda S: Experimental cervical myelopathy. II. Acute ischemic myelopathy. Arch Neurol. 21:571–589. 1969.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

96 

Hukuda S and Wilson CB: Experimental cervical myelopathy: Effects of compression and ischemia on the canine cervical cord. J Neurosurg. 37:631–652. 1972.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

97 

Gooding MR, Wilson CB and Hoff JT: Experimental cervical myelopathy: Autoradiographic studies of spinal cord blood flow patterns. Surg Neurol. 5:233–239. 1976.PubMed/NCBI

98 

Pavlov PW: Anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 12 (Suppl 2):S188–S194. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

99 

Pranteda G, Magri F, Moliterni E, Pranteda G and Quaglino P: Sannino-barduagni-bottoni syndrome. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 154:732–734. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

100 

al-Mefty O, Harkey HL, Marawi I, Haines DE, Peeler DF, Wilner HI, Smith RR, Holaday HR, Haining JL, Russell WF, et al: Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 79:550–561. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

101 

Hoff JNM, Pitts L, Vilnis V, Tuerk K and Lagger R: The role of ischemia in the pathogenesis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A review and new microangiopathic evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2:100–108. 1977.

102 

Ono K, Ota H, Tada K and Yamamoto T: Cervical myelopathy secondary to multiple spondylotic protrusions; a clinicopathologic study. Spine. 2:109–125. 1977.

103 

Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K and Namiki H: Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 8:1–15. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

104 

Carlson GD, Warden KE, Barbeau JM, Bahniuk E, Kutina-Nelson KL, Biro CL, Bohlman HH and LaManna JC: Viscoelastic relaxation and regional blood flow response to spinal cord compression and decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 22:1285–1291. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2023
Volume 19 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Fotakopoulos G, Georgakopoulou VE, Lempesis IG, Papalexis P, Sklapani P, Trakas N, Spandidos DA and Faropoulos K: Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy (Review). Biomed Rep 19: 84, 2023
APA
Fotakopoulos, G., Georgakopoulou, V.E., Lempesis, I.G., Papalexis, P., Sklapani, P., Trakas, N. ... Faropoulos, K. (2023). Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy (Review). Biomedical Reports, 19, 84. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1666
MLA
Fotakopoulos, G., Georgakopoulou, V. E., Lempesis, I. G., Papalexis, P., Sklapani, P., Trakas, N., Spandidos, D. A., Faropoulos, K."Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy (Review)". Biomedical Reports 19.5 (2023): 84.
Chicago
Fotakopoulos, G., Georgakopoulou, V. E., Lempesis, I. G., Papalexis, P., Sklapani, P., Trakas, N., Spandidos, D. A., Faropoulos, K."Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy (Review)". Biomedical Reports 19, no. 5 (2023): 84. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1666