Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Biomedical Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 2049-9434 Online ISSN: 2049-9442
Journal Cover
December-2025 Volume 23 Issue 6

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
December-2025 Volume 23 Issue 6

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Review Open Access

Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Qiang Zhao
    • Guangxin Li
    • Kunpeng Du
  • View Affiliations

    Affiliations: Center for Precision Cancer Medicine and Translational Research, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, P.R. China, Department of Pathology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing 400042, P.R. China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510282, P.R. China
  • Published online on: October 15, 2025     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2070
  • Article Number: 192
  • Copyright: © Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

With the advancement of precision medicine, machine learning (ML) and deep learning have increasingly become a pivotal tool for driving medical innovation. Precision medicine, grounded in individual variability, aims to deliver personalized treatment interventions, with ML serving as a critical enabler for achieving this goal. Recent ML‑driven progress in genomic analysis, personalized treatment optimization and disease diagnostics have significantly elevated the accuracy and efficacy of medical decision‑making processes. However, the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence also faces multifaceted challenges, including data privacy frameworks, cybersecurity risks, ethical considerations and the integration of technology with clinical workflows. The present review seeks to analyze cutting‑edge applications of ML within precision medicine domains, examine its challenges, and project future evolutionary pathways, emphasizing the critical need for proactive attention to these issues to ensure tangible benefits for patients and healthcare systems.

1. Introduction

Precision medicine embodies a paradigm shift in healthcare delivery, centered on the development of personalized treatment strategies that integrate individual genomic profiles, environmental exposures and lifestyle factors. This paradigm shift signifies an evolution from traditional ‘one-size-fits-all’ protocols to more patient-specific and precise medical interventions. The exponential growth of ‘omics’ technologies, particularly genomics and metabolomics, highlights the substantial promise of precision medicine across disease prevention, diagnostic frameworks and therapeutic intervention strategies (1).

Machine learning (ML) and algorithms facilitate high-throughput analysis of biological and clinical datasets. Within this framework, the rapid advancement of ML technologies demonstrates strong capabilities for data processing in precision medicine contexts. ML systems can efficiently handle complex biological and medical data, thereby enabling clinicians to gain comprehensive insights into individual patient characteristics and develop more targeted treatment protocols. For instance, in oncology, ML algorithms predict tumor progression risk and therapeutic response by analyzing genomic profiles, supporting personalized treatment planning (2). Furthermore, ML contributes to accelerating drug discovery processes and optimizing clinical trial design, thereby enhancing both operational efficiency and therapeutic effectiveness in medical practice (3).

However, despite the significant potential of ML in precision medicine, multiple challenges remain. Data security remains a paramount concern, requiring robust safeguards to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of medical data. Additionally, ethical dilemmas are emerging as prominent concerns, particularly regarding patient trust in ML-driven decision-making processes and transparency in data usage (4). Furthermore, clinical integration of ML remains impeded by diverse technical barriers, underscoring the necessity to validate ML efficacy and reliability (5). To offer a clearer overview of real-world applications and constraints of ML in precision medicine, the present review introduces a comparative table. The table systematically compares three core domains-genomics, medical imaging and personalized treatment-along dimensions of data types, key ML methodologies, representative applications and major challenges (Table I).

Table I

ML applications in addressing precision medicine challenges.

Table I

ML applications in addressing precision medicine challenges.

FieldData typeMain ML methodsMain challenges
GenomicsGenomic sequences, gene expression profiles and other multi-omics numbersML, deep learningThe problem of imbalance between high-dimensional data and samples makes it difficult to integrate cross-omicsdata. Genetic data is highly sensitive, and there are challenges in data sharing and privacy protection
Medical imagingMedical imaging and pathological tissue sections, ultrasound imagesDeep learning, traditional image processing and radiomics analysis methodsThe demand for large-scale labeled data is high, and different devices and imaging protocols bring challenges to model generalization. Challenges in integrating regulatory approval and clinical processes
Precision medicineElectronic health records (medical records), clinical phenotypes, lifestyle data, multi-omics and drug response dataML, deep learning, reinforcement learning, network modelsThe fusion and standardization of heterogeneous data are highly challenging. The explainability of ML results is insufficient. Ethical compliance (such as obtaining consent) and clinical adoption barriers

[i] ML, machine learning.

In summary, while the integration of ML within precision medicine offers transformative potential, it is accompanied by multifaceted challenges. The current narrative review was executed through a systematic literature review framework. PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Web of Science (https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/) and IEEE Xplore (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp) were systematically queried for English-language articles published between 2015 and 2025. Search terms encompassed ‘artificial intelligence (AI)’, ‘ML’, ‘precision medicine’, ‘genomics’, ‘deep learning’, ‘clinical integration’ and ‘data privacy.’ Article selection prioritized relevance to ML applications in precision medicine, with emphasis on studies focusing on algorithm development, medical ethics and data interoperability. Editorials, opinion pieces and redundant publications were excluded. The present study aims to deliver a comprehensive review and critical analysis of the current landscape, opportunities and barriers associated with ML in precision medicine, thereby providing a foundational resource for future research and clinical implementation.

2. ML and precision medicine

Utilization of AI in genomic data analysis. Genomic data mining

Genomic data mining constitutes a critical component of contemporary medical research, particularly within the domain of large-scale data analysis leveraging ML. Advancements in high-throughput sequencing technology have led to an exponential increase in genomic data volume, surpassing the analytical capacity of traditional methods. ML technologies, notably ML, excel in processing and interpreting these complex genomic datasets, yielding critical insights. For instance, deep learning algorithms identify genomic patterns and variations potentially associated with specific diseases (6). Additionally, ML integrates heterogeneous literature-derived data through text mining approaches, enabling researchers to identify candidate biomarkers and therapeutic targets (7). This capacity to process and analyze data not only enhances research efficiency but also accelerates precision medicine progress, expanding genomic applications.

Association of genetic variations with diseases. Elucidating the relationship between genetic diversity and disease susceptibility represents a cornerstone of genomic research. The integration of ML has significantly enhanced both the depth and efficiency of analytical capabilities in this field. Leveraging ML algorithms, researchers can now analyze large-scale genomic datasets to identify genetic variations associated with specific diseases. For instance, ML enables the detection of distinct gene mutations linked to tumor mutation burden, which play pivotal roles in complex disease progression (8). Furthermore, ML demonstrates the capacity to integrate multi-omics data, including genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic information, thereby facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of disease mechanisms (9). This multi-layered analytical framework not only deepens insights into the genetic basis of diseases but also provides actionable insights for early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies within clinical settings.

ML and precision diagnosis. ML exhibits remarkable capabilities within precision diagnostics, particularly for complex diseases such as cancer and genetic disorders. ML enables researchers to rapidly and accurately assess disease risks through comprehensive analysis of patients' genomic data. For example, ML reliably identifies ovarian cancer by analyzing epigenomic modifications in circulating free DNA, thereby supporting the development of personalized treatment strategies for individuals (10). Furthermore, ML integration into image analysis enables innovative methodologies in pathology, exemplified by automated analysis of histopathological images, which significantly enhances diagnostic precision for conditions such as gastric cancer (11). Collectively, ML not only augments diagnostic efficiency but also facilitates improved prognostic outcomes and therapeutic responses for patients, marking a transformative era in medical diagnostics.

ML in personalized treatment. Models for predicting drug response

The integration of AI in predicting patient responses to pharmacological interventions is garnering increasing attention. Leveraging ML methodologies, researchers can develop sophisticated predictive models capable of analyzing patients' genomic data, clinical features and historical medication responses. These models play a pivotal role in identifying key factors influencing drug efficacy, thereby enabling healthcare providers to develop personalized treatment plans. For instance, multiple studies have shown that multilayer cell line drug response network models can reliably predict therapeutic responses in breast cancer patients (12). Additionally, predictive models for acute myeloid leukemia drug responses demonstrate significant promise, offering critical insights to inform clinical decision-making (13). By implementing these models, clinicians can gain deeper insights into interpatient variability, ultimately enhancing pharmacological treatment effectiveness. Within precision medicine, ML functions through four sequential processes: Patient data acquisition, ML-driven analysis, personalized treatment implementation and outcome feedback, collectively forming a closed-loop system (Fig. 1).

Four sequential processes of
generative ML in precision medicine are illustrated: Patient data
acquisition, ML-driven analysis, personalized treatment
implementation and outcome feedback, forming a closed-loop
optimization system. ML, machine learning.

Figure 1

Four sequential processes of generative ML in precision medicine are illustrated: Patient data acquisition, ML-driven analysis, personalized treatment implementation and outcome feedback, forming a closed-loop optimization system. ML, machine learning.

Precision medicine for oncology. Personalized cancer treatment, synonymous with precision medicine, represents a paradigm-shifting strategy that tailors therapeutic interventions to the unique characteristics of each patient. This approach integrates multidimensional factors-including genetic predisposition, environmental exposures and lifestyle determinants-that collectively influence cancer development and progression. By focusing on these individualized parameters, healthcare providers can identify optimal treatment modalities for specific patients (14). Through analysis of tumor-specific biomarkers and genetic mutations, clinicians can develop tailored therapeutic regimens that not only enhance therapeutic efficacy but also mitigate the risk of adverse effects (15). This patient-centric paradigm not only improves clinical outcomes but also fosters greater patient engagement and adherence to therapeutic regimens. Recent advancements in genomic sequencing and bioinformatics have significantly enhanced the feasibility of implementing personalized treatment protocols. Consequently, oncologists are now better equipped to make evidence-based decisions grounded in a comprehensive understanding of each patient's tumor molecular profile. Ultimately, precision medicine holds substantial promise for improving survival rates and quality of life, marking a transformative shift toward individualized and molecularly targeted therapeutic options in oncology.

Optimizing treatment outcomes and dynamic monitoring. ML plays a critical role in optimizing treatment outcomes and enabling dynamic monitoring. By integrating real-time data analytics with patient-reported feedback, ML demonstrates the capacity to iteratively adjust therapeutic protocols in response to changes in patient conditions. For instance, in diabetes management, the integration of continuous glucose monitoring with ML-driven algorithms allows clinicians to dynamically optimize medication dosing, thereby improving patients' quality of life (16-18). Furthermore, in psychiatry, ML enhances treatment adherence and efficacy through continuous oversight of pharmacotherapy regimens (19). As ML technologies continue to advance, an expanding array of ML-based tools is expected to emerge, enabling healthcare providers to refine treatment strategies and monitor patient health more effectively, ultimately delivering more precise and personalized medical care.

Promise of ML in disease prediction and early diagnosis. Application of advanced image recognition technology in disease screening

The integration of advanced image recognition technology within disease screening is advancing rapidly, particularly in medical imaging analysis. Leveraging deep learning and ML algorithms, ML demonstrates proficiency in extracting complex features from medical images, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. For example, in ophthalmology, ML has been applied to screen for diabetic retinopathy, with studies indicating that ML systems achieve diagnostic precision comparable to experienced ophthalmologists and, in certain cases, exceed the performance of specialists (20). Furthermore, ML exhibits significant potential in detecting hepatic pathologies, accurately identifying early-stage conditions such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through analysis of ultrasonography and computed tomography scans (21). This advanced image recognition technology not only enhances screening efficiency but also diminishes reliance on manual interpretation, thereby facilitating broader access to healthcare services.

Collaboration of biomarkers and ML models. The integration of biomarker identification with ML models has paved the way for novel approaches in early disease diagnosis. By leveraging multi-omics data-including genomics and proteomics-ML demonstrates proficiency in detecting biomarkers linked to specific disease states (22). For instance, in early-stage cancer screening, ML can evaluate individual cancer risk and develop tailored surveillance protocols through analysis of multiple serum biomarkers. Additionally, ML identifies potential biomarkers by analyzing large-scale datasets, providing critical insights for novel drug development and disease prediction (23). This synergy not only improves the accuracy of biomarker discovery but also establishes a robust foundation for advancing precision medicine.

Enhancing early intervention and prognostic assessment capabilities. ML demonstrates significant potential in enhancing early intervention and prognostic assessment capabilities. Through comprehensive analysis of patient data, ML can identify individuals at elevated risk and develop tailored intervention strategies. For instance, in the clinical management of cardiovascular diseases, ML predicts the probability of cardiac events by analyzing patients' historical data and physiological parameters, enabling timely interventions (24). Furthermore, ML supports prognostic evaluations; by integrating clinical data with imaging results, it provides personalized prognostic assessments, enabling healthcare professionals to develop more effective treatment plans (25). This progress not only enhances patient outcomes but also reduces medical resource waste, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency of healthcare services.

Challenges of ML in the security and privacy of medical data. Data encryption and access control

In the domain of medical data security, the implementation of data encryption and access control is recognized as a critical technical strategy. The rapid advancement of ML has driven transformative changes in the storage and transmission of medical data, thereby posing new challenges to traditional security practices. Data encryption serves as a formidable barrier to prevent unauthorized access and ensure patient confidentiality. For instance, the application of homomorphic encryption enables computations to be performed without necessitating data decryption, thereby effectively safeguarding data privacy (26). Homomorphic encryption is a cryptographic technique that enables data to be analyzed in its encrypted form, facilitating secure analysis without exposing raw patient information. Moreover, the Attribute-Based Access Control model has gained significant traction in the administration of medical big data sharing, enabling flexible governance of access permissions based on user-specific attributes, thereby strengthening data security and adaptability (27). However, despite the potential these technologies offer for protecting medical information, challenges such as implementation complexities must be mitigated. Thus, healthcare organizations are encouraged to perform thorough evaluations when choosing the most suitable technologies.

Regulations of data privacy and ethical compliance. Adherence to data privacy regulations and ethical compliance frameworks is paramount in the deployment of ML technologies. With the enactment of legislation such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), medical institutions are mandated to ensure that their data processing practices align with legal standards to protect patient privacy rights (28). Furthermore, ethical compliance transcends mere legal obligations, encompassing the imperative to respect and safeguard patient autonomy through informed consent. When leveraging ML for patient data processing, healthcare providers must guarantee transparent communication regarding data utilization purposes and obtain explicit patient consent (29). However, practical implementation reveals significant challenges for healthcare organizations, largely attributable to the complexity and ambiguity inherent in legal frameworks. A critical tension also persists between advancing technological innovation and preserving patient confidentiality (30).

Significance of patient informed consent. Patient informed consent constitutes a cornerstone of ethical practice in healthcare, particularly regarding ML applications. Patients must be granted the autonomy to understand how their personal health information will be utilized, including associated risks and benefits (31). In the context of ML implementation, informed consent transcends mere legal compliance-it serves as a critical mechanism for fostering patient trust and safeguarding rights (32). As ML systems increase in complexity, patients may struggle to comprehend underlying algorithms and data processing methodologies. Healthcare organizations are therefore advised to implement transparent communication strategies that effectively convey technical details in accessible language (33). Ensuring informed patient consent and adhering to data privacy regulations such as GDPR remain essential. Dynamic consent platforms enable patients to control data-sharing preferences; while addressing ML biases requires vigilance-imbalanced training datasets may perpetuate healthcare disparities. Homomorphic encryption and federated learning represent promising solutions for enabling secure, decentralized data analysis.

Limitations of ML applications. Algorithmic bias has emerged as a critical ethical challenge in the application of ML within healthcare. When ML models are trained on datasets lacking demographic diversity or featuring imbalanced representations, they may produce biased outputs, resulting in disparate healthcare outcomes across diverse patient populations. For instance, empirical studies indicate that predictive models frequently exhibit suboptimal performance for racial minority groups or patients with rare diseases, attributable to inadequate representation in training datasets. Such disparities raise significant ethical concerns, as they risk perpetuating existing inequities in care access and diagnostic precision. To address this challenge, developers are advised to implement fairness audits, integrate diverse datasets, and employ bias-detection frameworks throughout the model development and validation lifecycle.

Challenges in technology integration and implementation. Data compatibility among diverse systems

In the modern healthcare ecosystem, ensuring data compatibility across heterogeneous systems is critical for the provision of high-quality medical care. Currently, the healthcare sector faces a multiplicity of data formats and standards, creating significant barriers to information exchange between institutions. A persistent challenge in healthcare has been the standardization of electronic health record systems, with the lack of interoperable data standards impeding the exchange and utilization of critical clinical information (34). To address this challenge, researchers have proposed various strategies, including the adoption of structural and semantic interoperability frameworks to improve communication among healthcare information systems (33). Furthermore, given the increasing demand for cross-border medical data compatibility, the development of health data warehouse systems has emerged as a pivotal focus of research. This initiative not only enhances the efficiency of data sharing but also facilitates cross-border collaboration in healthcare initiatives (36). Nevertheless, despite continuous technological advancements, concerns regarding data privacy and security remain critical barriers to implementation. The lack of adherence to standardization protocols can give rise to data breaches and potential misuse (37). Consequently, advancing data compatibility across healthcare systems requires collaborative efforts from policymakers, technology developers and healthcare providers. Adopting international standards such as Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) facilitates data interoperability by defining standardized resource definitions and interfaces. FHIR structures patient, diagnosis and medication information into standardized resources, thereby enabling data exchange through JSON/XML formats and RESTful APIs. This eliminates system barriers, allowing applications across devices or platforms to access unified clinical data.

Recognition of ML by the healthcare insurance system. The integration of ML within the healthcare sector is progressing at a rapid pace; however, the current healthcare insurance system's recognition of these innovations poses a significant barrier to their widespread adoption. Presently, healthcare insurance frameworks often exhibit delays in adapting to the evolving demands of emerging technologies, thereby hindering the implementation of ML applications (38). For instance, many insurance providers maintain skepticism regarding the clinical efficacy and reliability of ML-driven diagnostic tools, creating significant financial burdens for healthcare organizations seeking to deploy ML solutions (39). To enable the scalable adoption of ML technologies, it is imperative to redesign current healthcare insurance frameworks and establish rigorous evaluation systems capable of comprehensively assessing the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of ML interventions (40). Furthermore, regulatory bodies should facilitate collaboration between healthcare providers and technology developers by launching pilot programs to generate empirical evidence of ML's effectiveness, thereby providing a foundation for necessary insurance system reforms (41). Only through enhancing the adaptability of healthcare insurance frameworks can the full potential of ML in medical practice be realized.

Training of medical personnel and acceptance of ML. The professional development of healthcare workers and their readiness to adopt technological innovations are critical factors influencing the success of technological integration. While the adoption of emerging technologies holds potential to enhance healthcare efficiency and quality, limited comprehension and trust among clinical staff regarding these tools frequently lead to implementation resistance (42). Consequently, training programs for healthcare professionals must extend beyond technical proficiency, emphasizing foundational principles to build confidence and foster acceptance of novel technologies (43). For instance, some institutions have implemented simulation-based training and virtual reality platforms to facilitate comprehensive understanding of technological applications, demonstrating significant improvements in staff technological readiness (44). Additionally, organizational leadership should provide enhanced support mechanisms to encourage healthcare professionals to contribute insights on technological implementations, thereby promoting engagement and ownership (45). Only through structured training and open communication can the effective adoption of innovative technologies in clinical practice be guaranteed.

3. Discussion

The integration of ML into precision medicine presents transformative opportunities while simultaneously posing substantial challenges. Across genomics, oncology and clinical integration, ML-driven approaches have demonstrated the capacity to accelerate biomarker discovery, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and enable dynamic, individualized treatment strategies. For instance, in genomics, deep learning models have improved the identification of pathogenic variants and disease-associated patterns beyond the capacity of traditional bioinformatics pipelines. Similarly, in oncology, predictive modeling has facilitated patient-specific drug response forecasting, thereby optimizing therapeutic regimens. However, despite these advances, several systemic limitations remain evident. The reliance on heterogeneous and often imbalanced training datasets heightens the risk of algorithmic bias, potentially exacerbating disparities in diagnostic precision and therapeutic outcomes among underrepresented populations. Furthermore, the limited interoperability of healthcare data infrastructure, coupled with the reluctance of insurance frameworks to reimburse ML-driven interventions, constrains large-scale clinical adoption. Ethical concerns, including patient informed consent and the transparency of decision-support algorithms, also demand continuous oversight. Addressing these limitations requires a multi-stakeholder framework involving clinicians, policymakers and developers to standardize data protocols, mandate bias audits, and ensure rigorous clinical validation. Such coordinated efforts are essential for translating ML-enabled precision medicine from a conceptual paradigm into a scalable, equitable component of clinical care.

4. Conclusion

The integration of ML into precision medicine offers transformative potential, optimizing genomic analysis workflows, enabling personalized treatment planning, and enhancing disease prediction accuracy. These technological advancements not only improve therapeutic outcomes but also provide patients with more tailored healthcare solutions. However, the rapid advancement of ML necessitates addressing several critical challenges.

Primarily, challenges related to data privacy and security have become increasingly prominent. The effectiveness of ML systems relies heavily on large-scale patient datasets; thus, protecting sensitive information from misuse or unauthorized access has emerged as an urgent priority. Additionally, the complexities of technology integration demand careful consideration, as interoperability between heterogeneous ML systems and legacy healthcare infrastructure remains a significant barrier to seamless implementation. Achieving interoperability between diverse ML platforms and their effective integration into legacy healthcare systems is essential for realizing the full potential of precision medicine. Furthermore, ethical dimensions require rigorous scrutiny, particularly concerning patient informed consent and transparency in algorithmic decision-making processes.

Looking ahead, conducting comprehensive assessments of both the capabilities and risks associated with ML applications in precision medicine is imperative. Balancing technological innovation with ethical practices necessitates multistakeholder collaboration among research institutions, healthcare providers and regulatory authorities. Standardizing data formats, ensuring algorithmic fairness, and engaging clinicians and patients in co-design processes will maximize ML's clinical impact. Through rigorous governance frameworks, ML can realize its potential to deliver personalized, equitable and efficient care. To accelerate clinical translation and equitable adoption, clinicians should strengthen ML literacy through training programs, policymakers should develop unified data standards and insurance reforms to facilitate ML integration, and developers must ensure transparency, fairness and multi-center validation of their models. Coordinated implementation of these measures will be essential for transforming ML from an emerging innovation into a sustainable, equitable and indispensable component of precision medicine.

In summary, while the integration of ML within precision medicine holds significant promise, addressing the introduced multifaceted challenges remains imperative. A multidimensional framework encompassing technological, ethical and security dimensions is essential to ensure the sustainable evolution of precision medicine, ultimately delivering equitable benefits to diverse patient populations.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by the Science and Technology Talent Cultivation Project (grant no. RC20189) from Tianjin Municipal Health Commission.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

QZ, GL and KD conceptualized the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Hamamoto R, Suvarna K, Yamada M, Kobayashi K, Shinkai N, Miyake M, Takahashi M, Jinnai S, Shimoyama R, Sakai A, et al: Application of artificial intelligence technology in oncology: Towards the establishment of precision medicine. Cancers (Basel). 12(3532)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Lin PC, Tsai YS, Yeh YM and Shen MR: Cutting-edge AI technologies meet precision medicine to improve cancer care. Biomolecules. 12(1133)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Naik K, Goyal RK, Foschini L, Choi WC, Thielscher C, Zhu H, Lu J, Lehár J, Pacanoswki MA, Terranova N, et al: Current status and future directions: The application of artificial intelligence/machine learning for precision medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 115:673–686. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Tsopra R, Fernandez X, Luchinat C, Alberghina L, Lehrach H, Vanoni M, Dreher F, Sezerman OU, Cuggia M, de Tayrac M, et al: A framework for validating AI in precision medicine: Considerations from the European ITFoC consortium. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 21(274)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Singh AV, Chandrasekar V, Paudel N, Laux P, Luch A, Gemmati D, Tisato V, Prabhu KS, Uddin S and Dakua SP: Integrative toxicogenomics: Advancing precision medicine and toxicology through artificial intelligence and OMICs technology. Biomed Pharmacother. 163(114784)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Wu J and Zhao Y: Machine learning technology in the application of genome analysis: A systematic review. Gene. 705:149–156. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Bose S, Banerjee S, Kumar S, Saha A, Nandy D and Hazra S: Review of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in crop research. J Appl Genet. 65:225–240. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Sun X, Xue A, Qi T, Chen D, Shi D, Wu Y, Zheng Z, Zeng J and Yang J: Tumor mutational burden is polygenic and genetically associated with complex traits and diseases. Cancer Res. 81:1230–1239. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Zhang Y, Pang D, Wang Z, Ma L, Chen Y, Yang L, Xiao W, Yuan H, Chang F and Ouyang H: An integrative analysis of genotype-phenotype correlation in Charcot Marie Tooth type 2A disease with MFN2 variants: A case and systematic review. Gene. 883(147684)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Bahado-Singh RO, Ibrahim A, Al-Wahab Z, Aydas B, Radhakrishna U, Yilmaz A and Vishweswaraiah S: Precision gynecologic oncology: Circulating cell free DNA epigenomic analysis, artificial intelligence and the accurate detection of ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 12(18625)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Choi S and Kim S: Artificial intelligence in the pathology of gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 23:410–427. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Huang S, Hu P and Lakowski TM: Predicting breast cancer drug response using a multiple-layer cell line drug response network model. BMC Cancer. 21(648)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Trac QT, Pawitan Y, Mou T, Erkers T, Östling P, Bohlin A, Österroos A, Vesterlund M, Jafari R, Siavelis I, et al: Prediction model for drug response of acute myeloid leukemia patients. NPJ Precis Oncol. 7(32)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Avci CB, Bagca BG, Shademan B, Takanlou LS, Takanlou MS and Nourazarian A: Machine learning in oncological pharmacogenomics: Advancing personalized chemotherapy. Funct Integr Genomics. 24(182)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Chiffelle J and Harari A: Personalized cancer T-cell therapy takes the stage, mirroring vaccine success. J Exp Med. 221(e20240854)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Horgan R, Hage Diab Y, Fishel Bartal M, Sibai BM and Saade G: Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 143:195–203. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Shi Y, Wang Y, Niu K, Zhang W, Lv Q and Zhang Y: How CLSPN could demystify its prognostic value and potential molecular mechanism for hepatocellular carcinoma: A crosstalk study. Comput Biol Med. 172(108260)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Zhu J, Shi Y, Lan S, Wang J, Jiang F, Tang C, Cai Y, Pan Z, Jian H, Fang H, et al: Dissection of pyroptosis-related prognostic signature and CASP6-mediated regulation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: New sights to clinical decision-making. Apoptosis. 28:769–782. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Biso L, Aringhieri S, Carli M, Scarselli M and Longoni B: Therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry: Enhancing treatment precision and patient outcomes. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 17(642)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Cheung CY, Tang F, Ting DSW, Tan GSW and Wong TY: Artificial intelligence in diabetic eye disease screening. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 8:158–164. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Li XH, Liu F and Rao HY: New advances of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 30:443–446. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

22 

Wang HY, Lin WY, Zhou C, Yang ZA, Kalpana S and Lebowitz MS: Integrating artificial intelligence for advancing multiple-cancer early detection via serum biomarkers: A narrative review. Cancers (Basel). 16(862)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Reitsam NG, Enke JS, Vu Trung K, Märkl B and Kather JN: Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer: From patient screening over tailoring treatment decisions to identification of novel biomarkers. Digestion. 105:331–344. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Huang JD, Wang J, Ramsey E, Leavey G, Chico TJA and Condell J: Applying artificial intelligence to wearable sensor data to diagnose and predict cardiovascular disease: A review. Sensors (Basel). 22(8002)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Tan YY, Kang HG, Lee CJ, Kim SS, Park S, Thakur S, Da Soh Z, Cho Y, Peng Q, Lee K, et al: Prognostic potentials of AI in ophthalmology: Systemic disease forecasting via retinal imaging. Eye Vis (Lond). 11(17)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Guo L, Gao W, Cao Y and Lai X: Research on medical data security sharing scheme based on homomorphic encryption. Math Biosci Eng. 20:2261–2279. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Gupta R, Kanungo P, Dagdee N, Madhu G, Sahoo KS, Jhanjhi NZ, Masud M, Almalki NS and AlZain MA: Secured and privacy-preserving multi-authority access control system for cloud-based healthcare data sharing. Sensors (Basel). 23(2617)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Bertolaccini L, Falcoz PE, Brunelli A, Batirel H, Furak J, Passani S and Szanto Z: The significance of general data protection regulation in the compliant data contribution to the European society of thoracic surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 64(ezad289)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Miller DC and Smith CC: Spine Intervention Society's Patient Safety Committee. Informed consent. Pain Med: pnaa112, 2020 (Epub ahead of print).

30 

Zhang J and Zhang ZM: Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 23(7)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Khatiwada P, Yang B, Lin JC and Blobel B: Patient-generated health data (PGHD): Understanding, requirements, challenges, and existing techniques for data security and privacy. J Pers Med. 14(282)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Antwi WK, Akudjedu TN and Botwe BO: Artificial intelligence in medical imaging practice in Africa: A qualitative content analysis study of radiographers' perspectives. Insights Imaging. 12(80)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Sheth S, Baker HP, Prescher H and Strelzow JA: Ethical considerations of artificial intelligence in health care: Examining the role of generative pretrained transformer-4. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 32:205–210. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Walker DM, Tarver WL, Jonnalagadda P, Ranbom L, Ford EW and Rahurkar S: Perspectives on challenges and opportunities for interoperability: Findings from key informant interviews with stakeholders in ohio. JMIR Med Inform. 11(e43848)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Pournik O, Ahmad B, Lim Choi Keung SN, Peake A, Rafid S, Tong C, Laleci Erturkmen GB, Gencturk M, Akpinar AE and Arvanitis TN: Interoperable E-health system using structural and semantic interoperability approaches in CAREPATH. Stud Health Technol Inform. 305:608–611. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Gavrilov G, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E and Trajkovik V: Healthcare data warehouse system supporting cross-border interoperability. Health Informatics J. 26:1321–1332. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Ishimoto K, Arafune T, Washio T, Haishima Y, Matsumoto K, Uematsu M, Nomura Y, Yokoi H, Sato H, Murakami M, et al: Japanese regulatory considerations for interoperability of medical devices. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 57:104–108. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Nitiéma P: Artificial intelligence in medicine: Text mining of health care workers' opinions. J Med Internet Res. 25(e41138)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Baric-Parker J and Anderson EE: Patient data-sharing for AI: Ethical challenges, catholic solutions. Linacre Q. 87:471–481. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Müller L, Kloeckner R, Mildenberger P and Pinto Dos Santos D: Validation and implementation of artificial intelligence in radiology: Quo vadis in 2022? Radiologie (Heidelb). 63:381–386. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In German).

41 

Shen TT, Liu CF and Wu MP: Implementation of a machine learning model in acute coronary syndrome and stroke risk assessment for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 63:518–526. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Barchielli C, Marullo C, Bonciani M and Vainieri M: Nurses and the acceptance of innovations in technology-intensive contexts: The need for tailored management strategies. BMC Health Serv Res. 21(639)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Le Duff M, Michinov E, Bracq MS, Mukae N, Eto M, Descamps J, Hashizume M and Jannin P: Virtual reality environments to train soft skills in medical and nursing education: A technical feasibility study between France and Japan. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 18:1355–1362. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Abril-Jiménez P, Merino-Barbancho B, Lombroni I, Villanueva-Mascato S, Mallo I, Vera-Muñoz C, Arredondo MT and Fico G: Design of a training model for remote management of patients hospitalized at home. J Med Biol Eng. 40:610–617. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Lafferty L, Smith K, Causer L, Andrewartha K, Whiley D, Badman SG, Donovan B, Anderson L, Tangey A, Mak D, et al: Scaling up sexually transmissible infections point-of-care testing in remote aboriginal and torres strait islander communities: Healthcare workers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators. Implement Sci Commun. 2(127)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Zhao Q, Li G and Du K: Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review). Biomed Rep 23: 192, 2025.
APA
Zhao, Q., Li, G., & Du, K. (2025). Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review). Biomedical Reports, 23, 192. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2070
MLA
Zhao, Q., Li, G., Du, K."Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review)". Biomedical Reports 23.6 (2025): 192.
Chicago
Zhao, Q., Li, G., Du, K."Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review)". Biomedical Reports 23, no. 6 (2025): 192. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2070
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhao Q, Li G and Du K: Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review). Biomed Rep 23: 192, 2025.
APA
Zhao, Q., Li, G., & Du, K. (2025). Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review). Biomedical Reports, 23, 192. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2070
MLA
Zhao, Q., Li, G., Du, K."Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review)". Biomedical Reports 23.6 (2025): 192.
Chicago
Zhao, Q., Li, G., Du, K."Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review)". Biomedical Reports 23, no. 6 (2025): 192. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2070
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team