Measurement of normal patellar ligament and anterior cruciate ligament by MRI and data analysis

  • Authors:
    • Hongpo Wang
    • Caihong Hua
    • Hongkai Cui
    • Yuxia Li
    • Haixia Qin
    • Dongming Han
    • Junyan Yue
    • Changhua Liang
    • Ruimin Yang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 17, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.906
  • Pages: 917-921
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain geometric data of in vivo patellar ligament (PL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) by MRI and to analyze the correlation of the two with body weight, height and gender. A total of 157 cases with normal sagittal images of bilateral PL and ACL were enrolled. The PL and ACL lengths in the images were measured using the Radworks 5.1 application. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the data measured independently by three doctors was 0.997‑1.000. In individuals aged 15-24 years, the values of PL and ACL length and the PL to ACL ratio were 43.95±4.25 mm, 38.45±4.62 mm and 1.15±1.09 in males and 42.03±0.94 mm, 36.00±1.06 mm and 1.18±0.1 in females, respectively. In individuals aged 25-64 years, the values in males were 40.99±4.45 mm, 36.06±3.74 mm and 1.14±0.09 and in females were 39.84±0.64 mm, 36.50±0.81 mm and 1.11±0.02, respectively. In individuals aged ≥65 years, the values in males were 41.43±3.08 mm, 36.62±3.44 mm and 1.15±0.09 and in females were 38.94±0.79 mm, 34.36±0.85 mm and 1.13±0.07, respectively. There was a significant difference between PL and ACL length on the same side (P<0.01). The data obtained was stable and repeatable. The present study established a database of PL and ACL length and the ratio of the two measured by MRI.

Introduction

The morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has been reported to be ∼1 per 3,000 per year in the US population (1). For those engaged in football the incidence of ACL injury is ∼60 per 100,000 per year and for skiing athletes it is 70 per 100,000 per year (2). ACL injury may lead to articularis genus instability. Reconstruction should take place within 3 months, but if it is not then osteoarthritis may occur after 4–6 months, resulting in joint replacement and a poor quality of life. Therefore, it is important to diagnose and treat the injury early.

Due to the poor self-healing of the ACL, it requires repair by allograft reconstruction, instead of a simple ACL suture. The autologous transplantation is currently the most widely used in clinical practice and achieves good clinical results. Using an arthroscope, ACL reconstruction using the central third patellar ligament (PL) has become the standard surgical treatment of ACL injury (3). Autologous tissue, including the semitendinosus and the tensor fascia latae muscles, are used to reconstruct the ACL; however, these tissues are not sufficiently strong and relax over time. Therefore, the prospective efficacy is poor. In these surgical methods, the ligament-tendon insertion is reconstructed into the bone; however, the connection of tendon to bone is not reliable, as it becomes loose or avulses. In ACL recovery using the central third PL, bone-patellar tendon-bone (B-P-B) reconstruction allows bone-bone direct healing. The tensile strength of B-P-B is significantly higher than that of other tissues and the bones on both sides of B-P-B provide fixed points of the reconstructed cruciate ligament. The surgical process achieves bone bio-fixation and is regarded as the best option for orthopedists with the clear advantages of safety, accessibility and high strength (4). In clinical practice, a number of factors may lead to surgery failure, including the shortness, injury or pathological changes of the PL, as well as fractures in the operative field or meniscus and articular cartilage injury. A graft that is too long without sufficient fixation may cause graft-tunnel mismatch (58); therefore, the geometric data of the ligaments directly affect the graft and reconstruction (8).

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides good tissue resolution and high spatial resolution, which allows the clear imaging of bones, including the patella, femur and tibia, as well as the ligamental structures of the patellar tendon and ACL, with a clear boundary from peripheral tissue. Rigorous data may be obtained from MRI images using an MRI workstation with a precision of 0.01 mm. This is helpful for obtaining geometric data and determining the state of the articularis genus and ligament of the affected limb prior to surgery.

At present, the samples examined in studies of ACL length measurement have mainly been adult cadaver articularis genus specimens and the values reported differ greatly. The Physical Investigation Committee of the Chinese Society for Anatomical Science provided only data for ACL length (9) and previous MRI studies were case reports of abnormal PL (1013), which are not useful for ACL repair surgery. The present study establishes the geometric data of PL and ACL in vivo and provides valuable imaging information for ACL reconstruction.

Materials and methods

Inclusion criteria of images

Clear MRI images of the PL and ACL were obtained throughout the whole process with intact continuity. There were low-band signals in sequences and faults of PL. The ACL fiber bundles had distinctly visible fiber directions and equal signals, while the dense fiber bundles presented low signals.

Enrollment of subjects

A total of 157 cases with PL and ACL images were enrolled from October 2004 to March 2007. All individuals were Han Chinese with bilateral articularis genus MRI results. There were 79 male cases, aged 15–71 years, with a mean body weight of 64.24±4.98 kg and height of 169.63±6.06 cm and 78 female cases, aged 15–73 years, with a mean body weight of 56.93±4.88 kg and height of 158.73±4.52 cm. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with approval from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Examination methods

The GE Signa 1.5 Tesla superconductive magnetic resonance and dedicated articularis genus surface coil were used in the present study. In the examination, the subject lay supine with their knees placed in a comfortable position and the center of the coil was set at the inferior margin of the patella. The scan parameters were as follows: echo time (TE), 10 msec; repetition time (TR), 575 msec; echo train length (ETL), 2; bandwidth (BW), 20.83; field of vision (FOV), 16; slice thickness (ST), 4 mm; S-interval, 1 mm; frequency coding (Freq), 384; phase encoding (Phase), 256 and excitation number (Nex), 2.

PL and ACL measurement

PL length in the oblique sagittal position (L1) was from the lower edge of the patella to the tibial tubercle. In the ACL length (L2) measurement, the starting point was the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment and the end was the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point (L2 line). We calculated the ratio of L1 and L2 (L1/L2; Fig. 1).

Features in the MRI images were measured using the Radworks 5.1 professional workstation. In order to ensure reliability, all data were obtained by doctor A first, then, after one month the length of the left patellar tendon was remeasured independently by doctors B and C.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The paired t-test was used in the common index of left and right knee ligaments and the independent samples t-test was applied in the comparison between males and females. Linear regression and linear correlation analyses were used in the dependablity statistics for PL data and body weight, body height and ACL length. The data reliability from the same software was identified by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of the PL length measured by doctors A, B and C. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

ICC in left patellar tendon length

The left patellar tendon lengths determined by the three doctors were almost entirely credible, with an ICC of 0.80–1.00. The ICC was not <0.997 (Table I).

Table I.

ICC for the measurements of left patellar tendon length from three doctors.

Table I.

ICC for the measurements of left patellar tendon length from three doctors.

Left L1 from doctor BLeft L1 from doctor C
Left L1 from doctor A1.0000.997
Left L1 from doctor B0.997

[i] ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; L1, patellar ligament length in the oblique sagittal position, from the lower edge of the patellar to the tibial tubercle; L2, anterior cruciate ligament measurement, from the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment to the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point.

L1 and L2 in 157 cases

In the 157 cases of MRI data, the L1 and L2 for the left side of the body were not significantly different from those of the right side (P>0.05; Table II).

Table II.

Comparison of left and right L1 and L2.

Table II.

Comparison of left and right L1 and L2.

Left (mm)Right (mm)
N157157
L141.15±4.2441.21±4.23a
L236.40±4.4436.38±4.45a

a P>0.05, compared with the left side. L1, patellar ligament length in the oblique sagittal position, from the lower edge of the patellar to the tibial tubercle; L2, anterior cruciate ligament measurement, from the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment to the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point.

PL and ACL

In the MRI measurements of the left and right knees, the lengths of the PL and ACL in males were significantly greater than those in females (P<0.05; Table III).

Table III.

Comparison of PL and ACL in males and females.

Table III.

Comparison of PL and ACL in males and females.

Males
Females
PositionNLength (mm)NLength (mm)
L1Left7942.19±4.227840.10±4.01a
Right7942.20±4.237840.20±4.02a
Average15842.20±4.2115640.15±4.00a
L2Left7936.99±4.127835.80±4.68
Right7936.96±4.147835.79±4.69
Average15836.98±4.1215635.80±4.67a

a P<0.05, compared with males. PL, patellar ligament; ALC, anterior cruciate ligament; L1, patellar ligament length in the oblique sagittal position, from the lower edge of the patellar to the tibial tubercle; L2, anterior cruciate ligament measurement, from the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment to the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point.

Ratio of L1 and L2 (L1/L2)

There was no significant difference in L1/L2 between the left and the right sides, by paired t-test (P>0.05, Table IV).

Table IV.

Comparison of L1/L2 ratio between males and females.

Table IV.

Comparison of L1/L2 ratio between males and females.

L1/L2MaleFemaleTotal
Left1.15±0.091.13±0.111.14±0.10a
Right1.15±0.091.13±0.121.14±0.10a

a P>0.05, compared with the opposite side. L1, patellar ligament length in the oblique sagittal position, from the lower edge of the patellar to the tibial tubercle; L2, anterior cruciate ligament measurement, from the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment to the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point.

L1, L2 and L1/L2 in different age ranges

The L1 of the young group (aged 15–24 years) was significantly different from those of the post-adolescent (aged 25–64) and senior (aged ≥65 years) groups in male and female cases (P<0.05). However, L2 and L1/L2 did not present a correlation with age (P>0.05; Table V).

Table V.

L1, L2 and L1/L2 in different age stages.

Table V.

L1, L2 and L1/L2 in different age stages.

Male
Female
Age (years)NL1L2L1/L2NL1L2L1/L2
15–24 (young)5843.95±4.25a38.45±4.621.15±1.093642.03±0.94a36.00±1.061.18±0.11
25–64 (post-adolescent)5840.99±4.4536.06±3.741.14±0.097839.84±0.6436.50±0.811.11±0.02
≥65 (senior)4241.43±3.0836.62±3.441.15±0.094238.94±0.7934.36±0.851.13±0.07

a P<0.05, young group compared with the post-adolescent and senior groups. L1, patellar ligament length in the oblique sagittal position, from the lower edge of the patellar to the tibial tubercle; L2, anterior cruciate ligament measurement, from the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment to the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point.

Correlation analysis of L1 with body height, body weight and L2 length

L1 had no significant correlation with body height or weight by linear correlation and regression analysis. However, L1 was significantly correlated with the L2 of the same side (Table VI).

Table VI.

Correlation analysis of L1 with body height, body weight and L2.

Table VI.

Correlation analysis of L1 with body height, body weight and L2.

r-value
Left L1 and height0.143
Right L1 and height0.137
Left L1 and body weight0.038
Right L1 and body weight0.031
Left L1 and Left L20.672a
Right L1 and Right L20.664a

a P<0.01. L1, patellar ligament length in the oblique sagittal position, from the lower edge of the patellar to the tibial tubercle; L2, anterior cruciate ligament measurement, from the top of the lateral intercondylar notch in the femoral attachment to the front facies ossea of the eminentia intercondylaris in the tibial attachment point.

Discussion

ACL reconstruction using the central third PL under an arthroscope has become the standard surgical treatment for ACL injury. In clinical practice, a number of factors lead to surgery failure, including the shortness, injury or pathological changes of the PL, fractures in the operating field or meniscus and articular cartilage injury. The MRI appearance varies according to the pathological and histological changes of the injury. Ligament data measured by MRI are helpful to detect these abnormalities prior to surgery.

MRI has good tissue resolution and spatial resolution. Chen et al(14) confirmed that the 0.2 Tesla field strength of MRI clearly shows the ligament route in a normal knee and a lamellar anatomical cross-section in the oblique coronal plane of a frozen knee ACL. He et al(15) verified the clinical value of 0.2 Tesla field strength MRI for PL data. In the present study, all images were achieved using 1.5 Tesla MRI with specific coils for the articularis genus. The Radworks 5.1 measuring tool was accurate to 0.01 mm; therefore, our study obtained rigorous data with clinical value.

In the 157 cases, the ICCs were ≥0.997 for the left PL length as measured by three doctors. Landis and Koch (16) suggested that an ICC of 0.00–0.20 is not credible, 0.21–0.40 is generally credible, 0.41–0.60 is averagely credible, 0.61–0.80 has good credibility and 0.80–1.00 is almost entirely credible. Our ACL length result was similar to the value (36.00±0.20 mm) provided by the Physical Investigation Committee of the Chinese Society for Anatomical Science (9), which demonstrates the credibility of the present measurements. We considered that measurement results from Radworks 5.1 did not differ significantly between users and data from a single once-repeated survey using these measuring tools was credible.

In a study of an ACL autograft, Hadjicostas et al(17) compared the PL, semitendinosus and gracilis tendon and identified that the latter two have potential advantages in organism remodeling and regeneration with significant high-density collagen fibers and fibroblasts. The gracilis and semitendinosus tendons also have good strength; however, they do not form the ligament attachment points with soft tissue-bone fixation. In clinical practice, there are no significant differences between the patellar tendon and the semitendinosus tendon (18). Previously, a multicenter study demonstrated that the recovery of knee stability in ACL reconstruction with the patellar tendon is higher (20%) than with the semitendinosus and semimembranosus tendons (19). Noyes et al(20) reported that the tensile strength of the ACL is 100%, the central third B-P-B is 175%, the semitendinosus tendon is 75% and the tensor fascia lata tendon is 35%, in biomechanics. Toumi et al(21) observed that the mechanical stress distribution is asymmetric in the proximal end of the PL and the inside section is stronger than the outside.

At present, adult cadaver articularis genus samples have been used in a number of internal studies of ACL length measurement and the values reported are different. The Physical Investigation Committee of the Chinese Society for Anatomical Science provided only the value of the ACL length and previous MRI studies were case reports of abnormal PL. Olszewski et al(22) observed that the PL length was 43.33±4.21 mm in certain cases and Huang et al(23) observed that the PL length was 31.4–47.3 mm in 18 fresh knee specimens. Yoo et al(24) discovered using MRI that the PL length was 40.2±4.2 mm from the lower margin of the patella to the tibial tubercle, the width was 30.3±2.7 mm from the PL to the lower margin of the patella and the thickness was 3.2±0.5 mm. The authors also determined that the width was 24.0±2.8 mm from the PL to the tibial tubercle and the thickness was 5.0±0.7 mm. In the present study, the MRI results of the female PL were similar to the results by Yoo et al and the MRI results of the male PL were higher than those of the female; however, they were slightly lower than the measurements made by Olszewski et al. A reason for these differences may be that different materials were used. The data in one study was measured by caliper rule with an inherent error. Our study revealed that the PL and ACL lengths of individuals aged 15–24 years were different from those of individuals aged 25–64 years and ≥65 years. This difference may be associated with the physical development of individuals aged 15–24 years, demonstrating the necessity for ligament data from different ages to provide information for ACL reconstruction with allografts. Brown et al(25) suggested that PL and ACL length has no significant correlation with body weight, height and gender and that the PL length is significantly correlated with ACL length. The present study discovered that PL and ACL length had no significant correlation with body weight and height and the PL length was significantly correlated with ACL length. However, we observed correlations between gender and PL and ACL length.

One study suggested an ideal ‘equidistance’ status between the tibia and femur attachment points in the graft, which means that the distance between the two points remains fixed during knee flexion and extension (26). However, this theory is controversial and while a number of scholars believe that there is such an isometric section in ACL (27,28), others suggest that the ACL has no absolute isometric fibers (29). If the graft is not isometric, the graft is likely to undergo elongation and relaxation with knee flexion and extension. Penner et al suggested that permanent deformation would occur if the elongation of the ligament was >5–6% (30). Therefore, ligament deformation would occur when the length change of the graft is >2 mm in ACL reconstruction. In order to ensure the graft length fit for ACL, obtaining geometric data of the PL and ACL in the same age range and the ratio of the two is necessary for clinicians to determine the surgical program. The present study has provided this information for clinical practice. There was no significant difference of L1/L2 ratio in different ages and genders, respectively.

According to the theory of ‘cruciate ligament as four-bar linkage’ in knee kinematics, the anterior or posterior cruciate ligament is always isometric regardless of the degree of flexion and extension in the physiological range of the articularis genus. Maintaining the isometric graft in knee flexion and extension is an important biomechanical principle in the ligament reconstruction and the isometric graft is determined by the tunnel position of the femur and tibia. The location of the bone tunnel is the key factor in ACL reconstruction. The present study identified that the ratio of PL and ACL had no significant differences between the left and right side of the body or between males and females. Under conditions of ACL breakage and knee instability, these data of normal PL and ACL length, and the ratio of PL and ACL in the same age range are helpful to calculate the tunnel length. The tunnel external aperture may be descended to increase the tunnel gradient if the PL is too long. Following the adjustment of the graft tension in the B-P-B, the epactal ligament is likely to be reserved in the tibial tunnel and the bone block will not go beyond the tunnel to affect the screw fixation, since the femoral tunnel length is fixed. As a result, isometric fixation and a stable joint may be achieved.

In summary, MRI was used to obtain geometric parameters of in vivo PL and ACL for non-invasive and accurate measurements. The database of PL and ACL lengths and the ratio of the two was established by MRI in Han Chinese subjects of different age ranges. In individuals aged 15–24 years, the values in males were 43.95±4.25 mm, 38.45±4.62 mm and 1.15±1.09 and in females were 42.03±0.94 mm, 36.00±1.06 mm and 1.18±0.11, respectively. In individuals aged 25–64 years, the values in males were 40.99±4.45 mm, 36.06±3.74 mm and 1.14±0.09 and in females were 39.84±0.64 mm, 36.50±0.81 mm and 1.11±0.02, respectively. In individuals aged ≥65 years, the values in males were 41.43±3.08 mm, 36.62±3.44 mm and 1.15±0.09 and in females were 38.94±0.79 mm, 34.36±0.85 mm and 1.13±0.07, respectively. Our study achieves non-invasive measurements in a large sample and supplies image data of the articularis genus for use in surgery and sports medicine.

Subjects aged <15 years were not enrolled in the present study due to insufficient numbers; therefore, further study is required to supply the measurement data for that age group.

References

1. 

Huston LJ, Greenfield ML and Wojtys EM: Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete. Potential risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 372:50–63. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM and Stone ML: The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J Knee Surg. 4:43–48. 1991.

3. 

Chen DY, Jiang Q and Xu ZH: Comparison of transverse and longitudinal incisions for B-T-B graft harvesting in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. Chinese Journal of Sports Medicine. 27:78–80. 2008.(In Chinese).

4. 

Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF and Hefzy MS: Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee ligament repairs and reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 66:344–352. 1984.PubMed/NCBI

5. 

Augé WK II and Yifan K: A technique for resolution of graft-tunnel length mismatch in central third bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 15:877–881. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

6. 

Barber FA: Flipped patellar tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 16:483–490. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7. 

Denti M, Bigoni M, Randelli P, et al: Graft-tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Intraoperative and cadaver measurement of the intra-articular graft length and the length of the patellar tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 6:165–168. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar

8. 

Mariani PP, Calvisi V and Margheritini F: A modified bone-tendon-bone harvesting technique for avoiding tibial tunnel-graft mismatch in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 19:E32003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9. 

Physical Investigation Committee of the Chinese Society for Anatomical Sciences: Anatomic Data for Chinese People. People’s Medical Publishing House; Beijing, China: pp. 115–116. 2002

10. 

McLoughlin RF, Raber EL, Vellet AD, Wiley JP and Bray RC: Patellar tendinitis: MR imaging features, with suggested pathogenesis and proposed classification. Radiology. 197:843–848. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

11. 

Bernicker JP, Haddad JL, Lintner DM, DiLiberti TC and Bocell JR: Patellar tendon defect during the first year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: appearance on serial magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy. 14:804–809. 1998.

12. 

Wakeley CJ, Johnson DP and Watt I: The value of MR imaging in the diagnosis of the os trigonum syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 25:133–136. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13. 

Shalaby M and Almekinders LC: Patellar tendinitis: the significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Sports Med. 27:345–349. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

14. 

Chen W, Lu M, Wang J, et al: The comparative study of the anterior cruciate ligament in oblique coronal thin anatomical section and MRI. Chin J Radiol. 42:80–83. 2008.

15. 

He CA, Lou LX, Guo Z, Liang W, Li XS and Cheng XG: Length ratio of patellar tendon and patella measured on MR images. Radiologic Practice. 6:670–672. 2008.

16. 

Landis JR and Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:159–174. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17. 

Hadjicostas PT, Soucacos PN, Paessler HH, Koleganova N and Berger I: Morphologic and histologic comparison between the patella and hamstring tendons grafts: a descriptive and anatomic study. Arthroscopy. 23:751–756. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18. 

Marder RA, Raskind JR and Carroll M: Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med. 19:478–484. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar

19. 

Yunes M, Richmond JC, Engels EA and Pinczewski LA: Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 17:248–257. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

20. 

Noyes FR, Butler DL, Paulos LE and Grood ES: Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 172:71–77. 1983.

21. 

Toumi H, Higashiyama I, Suzuki D, et al: Regional variations in human patellar trabecular architecture and the structure of the proximal patellar tendon enthesis. J Anat. 208:47–57. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22. 

Olszewski AD, Miller MD and Ritchie JR: Ideal tibial tunnel length for endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 14:9–14. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23. 

Huang HY and Liu JF: The length of transfer cruciate ligament from patellar ligament and its significance. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 18:19–20. 2000.(In Chinese).

24. 

Yoo JH, Yi SR and Kim JH: The geometry of patella and patellar tendon measured on knee MRI. Surg Radiol Anat. 29:623–628. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25. 

Brown JA, Brophy RH, Franco J, et al: Avoiding allograft length mismatch during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patient height as an indicator of appropriate graft length. Am J Sports Med. 35:986–989. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

26. 

Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL, Downey DJ and Matsen FA III: Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res. 6:593–610. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27. 

Sapega AA, Moyer RA, Schneck C and Komalahiranya N: Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72:259–267. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

28. 

Arms SW, Pope MH, Johnson RJ, Fischer RA, Arvidsson I and Eriksson E: The rehabilitation and biomechanics of anterior cruciate reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 12:8–18. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar

29. 

Zavras TD, Race A, Bull AM and Amis AA: A comparative study of ‘isometric’ points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 9:28–33. 2001.

30. 

Penner DA, Daniel DM, Wood P and Mishra D: An in vitro study of anterior cruciate ligament graft placement and isometry. Am J Sports Med. 16:238–243. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March 2013
Volume 5 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang H, Hua C, Cui H, Li Y, Qin H, Han D, Yue J, Liang C and Yang R: Measurement of normal patellar ligament and anterior cruciate ligament by MRI and data analysis. Exp Ther Med 5: 917-921, 2013
APA
Wang, H., Hua, C., Cui, H., Li, Y., Qin, H., Han, D. ... Yang, R. (2013). Measurement of normal patellar ligament and anterior cruciate ligament by MRI and data analysis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 5, 917-921. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.906
MLA
Wang, H., Hua, C., Cui, H., Li, Y., Qin, H., Han, D., Yue, J., Liang, C., Yang, R."Measurement of normal patellar ligament and anterior cruciate ligament by MRI and data analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 5.3 (2013): 917-921.
Chicago
Wang, H., Hua, C., Cui, H., Li, Y., Qin, H., Han, D., Yue, J., Liang, C., Yang, R."Measurement of normal patellar ligament and anterior cruciate ligament by MRI and data analysis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 5, no. 3 (2013): 917-921. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.906