Anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis

  • Authors:
    • Minoru Tomizawa
    • Fuminobu Shinozaki
    • Kazunori Fugo
    • Yasufumi Motoyoshi
    • Takao Sugiyama
    • Shigenori Yamamoto
    • Takashi Kishimoto
    • Naoki Ishige
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 20, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2694
  • Pages: 1419-1422
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody (AMA-M2) is specific to primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but can also be found in certain patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Effective methods of differentiating between PBC and AIH are required, as their clinical course and management are different. Titers of AMA‑M2 were analyzed before and after follow‑up in patients with PBC or AIH. Patients who underwent liver biopsy and were diagnosed with either AIH (10 patients) or PBC (3 patients) were enrolled in the study. The AMA‑M2 antibody titers of these patients were analyzed upon hospital admission. AMA‑M2 reacted with the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex‑E2, branched‑chain 2‑oxo acid dehydrogenase complex and 2‑oxoglutaric acid dehydrogenase complex in the assay utilized for this study. The cut‑off value for AMA‑M2 was 5. Six AIH patients were AMA‑M2(‑) and 4 were AMA‑M2(+). The titer for the AIH patients who were AMA‑M2(+) was 24.8±14.8, compared with 324±174 in the patients with PBC (P=0.0138). Three AMA‑M2(+) AIH patients were followed‑up after liver biopsy. The AMA‑M2 levels had decreased in all 3 patients, becoming undetectable in 2 of them. In conclusion, certain patients with AIH in this study were found to be AMA‑M2(+), but the titers were significantly lower than those in the patients with PBC. At follow-up, the AIH patients exhibited decreased AMA-M2 titers.

Introduction

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is caused by an immune attack on the hepatocytes (1). Patients with AIH are positive for auto-antibodies, such as anti-nuclear, anti-smooth muscle and liver-kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies (2). Chronic inflammation in the liver can progress to liver cirrhosis (3). One major problem of AIH is that an acute presentation or exacerbation of the disease can progress to liver failure (4,5). Furthermore, patients with AIH can be susceptible to hepatocellular carcinoma (6); therefore, patients should be followed-up for exacerbation and hepatocellular carcinoma (7). Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is characterized by nonsuppurative cholangitis and autoimmune-mediated destruction of the small or medium-sized bile ducts (8). Inflammation causes cholestasis and the liver develops cirrhosis (9). AIH is treated with immunosuppressive drugs, such as prednisolone or azathioprine (10,11), while PBC is treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (10). It is important to differentiate AIH from PBC due to the differences in the clinical course and management of the two diseases.

Anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) can be tested via indirect immunofluorescence (12). In this technique, unfixed sections of the kidney and stomach of Wistar rats are used. AMA is used for the diagnosis of PBC (13), as 90–95% of patients with PBC are positive for AMA (14); however, the use of AMA as a differential test is problematic, as 5% of patients with AIH are positive for AMA (15), and the interpretation of a positive AMA result in AIH is difficult.

The auto-antigens of AMA have been identified as pyruvate dehydrogenase complex-E2 (PDC-E2), branched-chain 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complex and 2-oxoglutaric acid dehydrogenase complex (16,17). The antibody to these antigens is known as AMA-M2 (18). AMA-M2 is more specific to PBC than AMA, and the determination of its titer is feasible (19). It is widely accepted that AMA-M2 is useful for the diagnosis of PBC, and a scoring system for PBC that uses the antibody has been generated (20); however, patients with AIH can still test positive for AMA-M2 (21).

The present study investigates AIH patients who are AMA-M2(+). Titers of AMA-M2 are compared between AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and PBC patients, and the changes in AMA-M2 during the follow-up of the patients with AIH are reported.

Patients and methods

Patients

The records of patients who underwent liver biopsy between April 2009 and March 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were selected, as this study was retrospective. Patents were included only when they were diagnosed as AIH or PBC with liver biopsy, and their AMA-M2 was subsequently analyzed. Liver biopsies were crucial for the histological confirmation of the diagnosis. The liver biopsy was performed during hospitalization with an automatic liver biopsy needle, which measured 14 G in diameter and 150 mm in length (ACE-141501; TSK Laboratory, Tochigi, Japan) (22). Ten patients were diagnosed with AIH (2 men and 8 women), and 4 patients were diagnosed with PBC (all women). No patients were diagnosed with the PBC-AIH overlap syndrome. This study was reviewed by the ethics committee of the National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital (Yotsukaido, Japan) and was not considered to be a clinical trial, as it was performed as a part of routine clinical practice. The committee waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study. Patient anonymity was preserved.

Diagnosis of AIH

The diagnosis of AIH was based on a scoring system proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (23). AIH was diagnosed when the pre-treatment score was >10 or the post-treatment score was >12 and the pathological findings were consistent with AIH.

Diagnosis of PBC

The diagnosis of PBC was based on guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (13). Patients were diagnosed with PBC when alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were elevated, the AMA test was positive and there was evidence of nonsuppurative cholangitis and the destruction of small or medium-sized bile ducts. The diagnosis of PBC-AIH overlap syndrome was based on the Paris criteria (24).

Laboratory data

The laboratory data analyzed in the present study were ALP, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and AMA-M2. The data were collected upon admission of the patients to the hospital. Detection of AMA-M2 was outsourced to the LSI Medience Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). AMA-M2 reacted with the PDC-E2, the branched-chain 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complex and the 2-oxoglutaric acid dehydrogenase complex (16). The cut-off value for AMA-M2 was 5. Patients with values <5 were considered negative for AMA-M2; patients with values >5 were considered positive.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was performed for the analysis of the laboratory data using the statistical software JMP 10.0.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Comparison of AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and PBC patients

The laboratory data of the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and PBC patients were compared to confirm that the patients had different diseases (Table I). ALP levels tended to be higher in the patients with PBC than those in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients. AST and ALT levels were higher in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients than those in the PBC patients. No significant differences were found between the groups (P>0.05). Higher levels of ALP indicate bile duct obstruction, a characteristic of PBC (13). The higher AST and ALT levels in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients were due to the acute presentation.

Table I.

Blood analysis comparison between AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and PBC patients.

Table I.

Blood analysis comparison between AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and PBC patients.

ParameterAMA-M2(+) AIH patientsPBC patientsP-value
Age (years) 59.3±14.8 61.8±19.90.8467
ALP (IU/l) 457±126 780±3490.1312
AST (IU/l) 631±212 59±220.1044
ALT (IU/l) 663±777 66±220.1752
γ-GTP (IU/l) 258±135 298±3390.8340

[i] One-way analysis of variance was applied to the results. AMA-M2, anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase.

Titers of AMA-M2 were compared between the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and the patients with PBC (Fig. 1). Titers of AMA-M2 were 24.8±14.8 in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and 324±174 in the PBC patients. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.0138).

Comparison of AMA-M2(-) and AMA-M2(+) AIH patients

Next, the laboratory data of the AMA-M2(-) and AMA-M2(+) AIH patients were compared to assess any differences (Table II). AST and ALT levels were higher in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients than those in the AMA-M2(-) AIH patients, but the difference was not significant.

Table II.

Comparison between AMA-M2(-) and AMA-M2(+) AIH patients.

Table II.

Comparison between AMA-M2(-) and AMA-M2(+) AIH patients.

ParameterAMA-M2(-) AIH patientsAMA-M2(+) AIH patientsP-value
Males:females2:40:4NA
Age (years) 52.3±15.2 59.3±14.80.4974
ALP (IU/l) 367±140 457±1260.3304
AST (IU/l) 198±103 631±2120.1115
ALT (IU/l) 271±144 663±7770.2500
γ-GTP (IU/l) 235±116 258±1350.7800

[i] One-way analysis of variance was applied to the results. AMA-M2, anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; NA, not applicable; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase.

Follow-up

Three AMA-M2(+) AIH patients were followed-up after liver biopsy (Table III). The levels of AMA-M2, AST, ALT and γ-GTP had decreased in all the patients. Two patients became negative for AMA-M2.

Table III.

Follow-up of AMA-M2(+) patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

Table III.

Follow-up of AMA-M2(+) patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

ParameterPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3
GenderFemaleFemaleFemale
Age (years)     38     65     72
ALP (IU/l)
  0 months  589  542  531
  Follow-upa  202  395  158
AST (IU/l)
  0 months1,460  107  662
  Follow-upa     14     62     18
ALT (IU/l)
  0 months1,780     55   585
  Follow-upa     12     37     15
γ-GTP (IU/l)
  0 months   264     70   387
  Follow-upa     32     53     65
AMA-M2
  0 months         21.2     9.4         44.9
  Follow-upa(-)(-)         13.1

a Follow-up time-points were 50, 38 and 9 months after admission for patients 1, 2 and 3, respectively. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; AMA-M2: anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody.

Discussion

It is established that AMA-M2 is more specific to PBC than to AIH (13); therefore, the AMA-M2 titer is a common test for PBC (25,26). A problem with this is that patients with AIH can still test positive for AMA-M2 (21). In a study by Yanagawa et al (27), 9 out of 55 patients with AIH were found to be positive for AMA-M2. In the present study, 4 AIH patients were found to be positive for AMA-M2 on admission. The difference in the percentage of patients positive for AMA-M2 may have been dependent on the antigens with which AMA-M2 reacted. The method used by Yanagawa et al (27) detected PDC-E2, whereas the method used in the present study detected branched-chain 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complex and 2-oxoglutaric acid dehydrogenase complex, in addition to PDC-E2. Another reason for the difference may have been the method utilized to detect positivity. Yanagawa et al used western blot analysis, while the outsourced laboratory in the present study used a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). The CLEIA is more sensitive than western blot analysis (28).

The titers of AMA-M2 in AIH patients have not been previously reported, to the best of our knowledge. In the present study, the titers of AMA-M2 were significantly lower in the AIH patients than those in the PBC patients, suggesting that a higher AMA-M2 titer is specific to PBC (26). AMA-M2 has been found to persist or disappear after long-term follow-up in AIH patients (29). In the present study, titers of AMA-M2 decreased in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients.

One major limitation of the present study was that it included a small number of patients. Lower ALP and higher AST/ALT values are characteristics of AIH as compared with PBC (21). The same tendency was found in this study, but the differences were not statistically significant. Despite the small number of patients, the titers of AMA-M2 were found to be significantly higher in the patients with PBC than those in the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients; however, a larger sample of patients is required to confirm these results. Fig. 1 shows a gap in the AMA-M2 titers between the AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and the PBC patients, which indicates that threshold values may exist to differentiate between AMA-M2(+) AIH patients and patients with PBC. A study with a larger sample size is required to investigate this further.

In conclusion, certain patients with AIH were found to be positive for AMA-M2 in the present study, but the titers were significantly lower than those in the PBC patients. AMA-M2 titers were decreased in the AIH patients at follow-up. Future studies should include a larger sample size and investigate liver biopsies, focusing on bile duct lesions.

References

1 

Liberal R, Grant CR, Mieli-Vergani G and Vergani D: Autoimmune hepatitis: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun. 41:126–139. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Liberal R, Mieli-Vergani G and Vergani D: Clinical significance of autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis. J Autoimmun. 46:17–24. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Krawitt EL: Autoimmune hepatitis. N Engl J Med. 354:54–66. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Oketani M, Ido A, Nakayama N, Takikawa Y, Naiki T, Yamagishi Y, Ichida T, Mochida S, Onishi S and Tsubouchi H: Intractable Hepato-Biliary Diseases Study Group Of Japan: Etiology and prognosis of fulminant hepatitis and late-onset hepatic failure in Japan: Summary of the annual nationwide survey between 2004 and 2009. Hepatol Res. 43:97–105. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Czaja AJ: Acute and acute severe (fulminant) autoimmune hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 58:897–914. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Montano Loza, Carpenter HA and Czaja AJ: Predictive factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 103:1944–1951. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Yoshizawa K, Matsumoto A, Ichijo T, Umemura T, Joshita S, Komatsu M, Tanaka N, Tanaka E, Ota M, Katsuyama Y, et al: Long-term outcome of Japanese patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 56:668–676. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Bowlus CL and Gershwin ME: The diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis. Autoimmun Rev. 13:441–444. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Kakuda Y, Harada K, Sawada-Kitamura S, Ikeda H, Sato Y, Sasaki M, Okafuji H, Mizukoshi E, Terasaki S, Ohta H, et al: Evaluation of a new histologic staging and grading system for primary biliary cirrhosis in comparison with classical systems. Hum Pathol. 44:1107–1117. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Manns MP, Czaja AJ, Gorham JD, Krawitt EL, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D and Vierling JM: American Association For The Study Of Liver Diseases: Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 51:2193–2213. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Verslype C, George C, Buchel E, Nevens F, van Steenbergen W and Fevery J: Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis at age 65 and older. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 21:695–699. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Chantran Y, Ballot É and Johanet C: Autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis: Antimitochondrial autoantibodies. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 37:431–433. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lindor KD, Gershwin ME, Poupon R, Kaplan M, Bergasa NV and Heathcote EJ: American Association For Study Of Liver Diseases: Primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 50:291–308. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Gershwin ME, Mackay IR, Sturgess A and Coppel RL: Identification and specificity of a cDNA encoding the 70 kd mitochondrial antigen recognized in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Immunol. 138:3525–3531. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA, Santrach PJ, Moore SB and Homburger HA: The nature and prognosis of severe cryptogenic chronic active hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 104:1755–1761. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Moteki S, Leung PS, Dickson ER, Van Thiel DH, Galperin C, Buch T, Alarcon-Segovia D, Kershenobich D, Kawano K, Coppel RL, et al: Epitope mapping and reactivity of autoantibodies to the E2 component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in primary biliary cirrhosis using recombinant 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex. Hepatology. 23:436–444. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Gershwin ME, Rowley M, Davis PA, Leung P, Coppel R and Mackay IR: Molecular biology of the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complexes and anti-mitochondrial antibodies. Prog Liver Dis. 10:47–61. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Leung PS, Chuang DT, Wynn RM, Cha S, Danner DJ, Ansari A, Coppel RL and Gershwin ME: Autoantibodies to BCOADC-E2 in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis recognize a conformational epitope. Hepatology. 22:505–513. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Yamagiwa S, Kamimura H, Takamura M and Aoyagi Y: Autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis: Recent progress in research on the pathogenetic and clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol. 20:2606–2612. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Yamamoto K, Terada R, Okamoto R, Hiasa Y, Abe M, Onji M and Tsuji T: A scoring system for primary biliary cirrhosis and its application for variant forms of autoimmune liver disease. J Gastroenterol. 38:52–59. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Farias AQ, Gonçalves LL, Bittencourt PL, De Melo ES, Abrantes-Lemos CP, Porta G, Nakhle MC, Carrilho FJ and Cancado EL: Applicability of the IAIHG scoring system to the diagnosis of antimitochondrial/anti-M2 seropositive variant form of autoimmune hepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 21:887–893. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Suzuki A, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Miquel R, Smyrk TC, Andrade RJ, Lucena MI, Castiella A, Lindor K and Björnsson E: The use of liver biopsy evaluation in discrimination of idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis versus drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology. 54:931–939. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, Bianchi L, Burroughs AK, Cancado EL, Chapman RW, Cooksley WG, Czaja AJ, Desmet VJ, et al: International autoimmune hepatitis group report: Review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 31:929–938. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Chazouilleres O, Wendum D, Serfaty L, Montembault S, Rosmorduc O and Poupon R: Primary biliary cirrhosis-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome: Clinical features and response to therapy. Hepatology. 28:296–301. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Dellavance A, Cancado EL, Abrantes-Lemos CP, Harriz M, Marvulle V and Andrade LE: Humoral autoimmune response heterogeneity in the spectrum of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatol Int. 7:775–784. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Miyakawa H, Kitazawa E, Fujikawa H, Kikuchi K, Abe K, Kawaguchi N and Kako M: Analysis of two major anti-M2 antibodies (anti-PDC-E2/anti-BCOADC-E2) in primary biliary cirrhosis: Relationship to titers of immunofluorescent anti-mitochondrial antibody. Hepatol Res. 18:1–9. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Yanagawa T, Miyakawa H, Shibata M, Kawaguchi N, Ishibashi M, Goto N and Mitamura K: Immunoreactivity to pyruvate dehydrogenase complex-E2 in well-defined patients with autoimmune hepatitis: Western blot analysis. Hepatol Res. 26:81–86. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Roda A, Pasini P, Guardigli M, Baraldini M, Musiani M and Mirasoli M: Bio- and chemiluminescence in bioanalysis. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 366:752–759. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

O'Brien C, Joshi S, Feld JJ, Guindi M, Dienes HP and Heathcote EJ: Long-term follow-up of antimitochondrial antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 48:550–556. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2015
Volume 10 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Fugo K, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S, Kishimoto T and Ishige N: Anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis. Exp Ther Med 10: 1419-1422, 2015
APA
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Fugo, K., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S. ... Ishige, N. (2015). Anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 10, 1419-1422. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2694
MLA
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Fugo, K., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S., Kishimoto, T., Ishige, N."Anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 10.4 (2015): 1419-1422.
Chicago
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Fugo, K., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S., Kishimoto, T., Ishige, N."Anti-mitochondrial M2 antibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 10, no. 4 (2015): 1419-1422. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2694