
Hepatitis B envelope antigen increases Tregs by converting CD4+CD25‑ T cells into CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 6, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9107
- Pages: 3679-3686
-
Copyright: © Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a noncytopathic virus that can establish a lifelong chronic infection in humans. Currently, 3.5% of the global population suffers from chronic HBV infection, and therefore have a high risk of developing liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which cause nearly 1 million annual deaths (1,2). Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) exhibit a suppression of virus-specific immune responses that is closely associated with viral persistence and reduced responsiveness to interferon-based therapies (3-5). However, to the best of our knowledge, the underlying mechanisms for this antiviral immune hypo-responsiveness are not yet well defined.
HBV typically encodes four antigens, hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg), hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B X antigen (HBxAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Patients with CHB are known to have persistently high quantities of the viral antigens HBsAg and HBeAg in their peripheral blood (6,7). HBeAg, a secretory form of the nucleocapsid antigen, is not required for viral infection or replication (8-10). However, HBeAg clearance or seroconversion in CHB patients is closely related to the restoration of antiviral T cell function following effective treatment (11,12). Secreted HBeAg has been shown to suppress the HBV-specific immune response and promote HBV persistence (12,13).
Diverse suppressive pathways have been implicated in the dysfunctional antiviral responses in CHB (6). Among the proposed mechanisms, regulatory T cell (Treg) activation in CHB is a major concern. Tregs, an immunoregulatory T cell subpopulation, are characterized by high expression of CD25 and transcription factor forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) compared to conventional CD4+ T cells and capable of suppressing the immune functions of numerous cell types, including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, natural killer T cells and dendritic cells (14). Patients with CHB harbor an increased percentage of Tregs in their peripheral blood that is positively correlated with serum HBV DNA load, the reduction of antiviral and treatment responses and increased risk of HCC (15-19). Furthermore, patients with HBeAg-positive CHB exhibited a higher percentage of Tregs in peripheral blood than those with HBeAg-negative CHB (15,19,20). However, to the best of our knowledge, whether and how HBeAg manipulates the host immune system to induce the conversion of T cells to Tregs remains to be elucidated.
The present manuscript describes a preliminary study to investigate the involvement of HBeAg in the activation of Tregs using mouse model. In vitro and in vivo studies indicated that HBeAg may convert naive T cells into Tregs, potentially due to increased transforming growth factor (TGF)-β production induced by HBeAg. The results of the present study may provide further evidence of the effect of HBeAg on Tregs and of the benefit of the development of novel HBeAg-based immunotherapy for CHB.
Materials and methods
Animal studies
Animal experiments were conducted in strict accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (date issued, November 14th, 1988; http://en.pkulaw.cn). All efforts were made to minimize suffering, and all procedures for the use of laboratory animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nanjing Medical University (Permit Number: IACUC-1601123).
Specific pathogen-free 7-8-week-old female BALB/c mice (22~25 g body weight) were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing, China) and bred in a specific pathogen-free animal facility. At the end of the experiments, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation under isoflurane anesthesia (5% in oxygen).
MHC class II binding prediction
The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB 2.22; http://tools.iedb.org/mhcii/) was used to predict human and mouse MHC class II binding peptides in HBeAg (GenBank accession no. AUR80753.1) from the HLA-DRB1*03:01 and H2-IAb/H2-IAd MHC class II alleles. In the prediction, percentile ranks ranged from 0-100, and low percentile ranks were good MHC II binders. As predicted by IEDB, MHC class II epitopes with a percentile rank below 10 were considered good binders.
Cytokine assays
The amounts of total and active TGF-β in the supernatants of spleen cells were determined with commercial ELISA kits (cat. nos. 437707 and 436707; BioLegend, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cytokine concentration in each supernatant was extrapolated from a standard curve.
Cell isolation
Spleens from 7-8-week-old female BALB/c mice were pressed through nylon nets to prepare single-cell suspensions. Cells were washed with PBS containing 1% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 0.2 M EDTA, counted after lysing the red blood cells, and then used to isolate CD4+CD25– T cells by using a mouse regulatory T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) and a magnetic activated cell sorter (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) according to the manufacturer's instructions, achieving ~90% purity as determined by flow cytometry (FCM).
Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) were prepared from spleen cell suspensions by negative selection using CD90.2 magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) to deplete T cells. Isolated APCs were treated with mitomycin-C (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 50 µg/ml for 30 min and then washed thoroughly before incorporation into cocultures.
FCM analysis
To analyze CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs, the Mouse Regulatory T Cell Staining kit (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, cells from mice spleens or cell cultures were surface stained with anti-CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone 145-2C11), anti-CD4-FITC (clone RM4-5) and anti-CD25-APC (clone PC61.5) and subsequently permeabilized with cold Fix/Perm Buffer. The Fc receptors were then blocked with anti-CD16/32 for. A PE-labeled anti-Foxp3 (clone FJK16s) was then added. Following staining, the cells were examined using a FACS Verse flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using FlowJo (v10.0.7; FlowJo LLC).
In vitro cell cultures
To determine the in vitro activation of Tregs by HBeAg, spleen cells from normal BALB/c mice were cultured in 96-well round-bottom plates at a density of 5x105 cells/well in complete RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Corresponding concentrations of HBeAg (0.2, 1, 5 or 10 µg/ml; Shanghai Yuan Mu Biotechnology Co., Ltd) or Grade VII chicken egg ovalbumin (OVA; 1 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) were added to each culture in four wells per condition. An inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β type 1 receptor (TGF-βRI signaling; 20 µM; SB-431542; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added to a proportion of the wells. After 3 days, cells were harvested from cultures and washed twice by centrifugation (300xg, 10 min, 4˚C) in PBS. After counting, cells were stained for FCM analysis, and supernatants were collected for cytokine detection by ELISA.
To investigate the Treg conversion of naive T cells induced by HBeAg in vitro, MACS-isolated CD4+CD25- T cells (2x105 cells/well) were cocultured with mitomycin-C-treated APCs (1x105 cells/well) in triplicate in 96-well round-bottom culture plates and stimulated with HBeAg (1 µg/ml) or OVA (1 µg/ml). After 3 days, cells were collected for FCM analysis.
Immunization protocol
In each experiment, 10 normal BALB/c mice were randomly divided into two groups consisting of 5 mice per group. Mice were subcutaneously (inguinal region) injected with 100 µl of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of antigen (25 µg of HBeAg or PBS alone) and incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Each mouse was injected twice with a 14-d internal injection. Immunized mice were sacrificed under isoflurane anesthesia 10 days after the last injection and their spleens were collected for analysis.
Statistical methods
All statistical calculations were performed by using the SPSS program (v26 for Windows; IBM Corp.). The comparisons between more than two groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by an LSD post hoc test (n<4 groups) or a Tukey's post hoc test (n≥4 groups). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Prediction of potential CD4+ T cell epitopes in the HBeAg
The IEDB consensus binding prediction platform was employed to predict the potential CD4+ T cell epitopes of HBeAg. Putative epitopes with a percentile rank <10% were considered MHC class II binders. As recommended by IEDB, 38 human and 20 mouse potential CD4+ T cell epitopes were identified in HBeAg from the HLA-DRB1*03:01 and H2-IAb/H2-IAd MHC class II alleles, respectively (Table I and II). These data suggest that HBeAg has multiple high-affinity agonist peptides and may potentially induce CD4+ T cell activation.
HBeAg converts naive T cells to Tregs in spleen cells in vitro
HBeAg was further examined for its ability to induce the conversion of naive T cells into Tregs in spleen cells cultured for 3 days in vitro. FCM analysis suggested that there were no significant differences in the proportions of CD4+ T cells among all the groups (Fig. 1A and B). But notably, FCM analysis revealed that the percentage of CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs within the CD4+ T cell population of HBeAg-treated spleen cells increased over the 3-day period in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A and 1C). By contrast, no significant increase was observed within OVA-treated spleen cells (Fig. 1A and 1C). Different doses (0.2, 1, 5, and 10 µg/ml) were used to test the ability of HBeAg to induce spleen cell differentiation into Tregs in vitro. In these experiments, the medium doses (1 and 5 µg/ml) of HBeAg increased the population of Tregs, but the low dose (0.2 µg/ml) and the high dose (10 µg/ml) appeared unable to trigger this increase of Tregs (Fig. 1A and 1C).
HBeAg converts CD4+CD25- T cells to CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs in vitro
To determine whether the increase in Treg numbers induced by HBeAg could be due to de novo induction of Foxp3 expression in activated T cells, MACS-isolated CD4+CD25- T cells from spleens of normal BALB/c mice were cultured with HBeAg in the presence of APCs. The number of Tregs was determined 3 days later by FCM, and the results suggested that HBeAg significantly converted CD4+CD25- T cells to CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs when compared to the medium or OVA control groups (Fig. 2A and 2B).
HBeAg induces conversion of T cells to Tregs in spleen cells in vitro by triggering TGF-β production
As TGF-β plays a critical role in the conversion of peripheral T cells to Tregs by promoting Foxp3 expression (21,22), whether HBeAg could induce TGF-β production in murine spleen cells in vitro was analyzed. Indeed, HBeAg induced a two-fold increase in total TGF-β production by spleen cells compared with the OVA-treated control (Fig. 3A). The presence of biologically active TGF-β was also assessed and a 3-fold increase in active TGF-β release from HBeAg-treated spleen cells was observed when compared to OVA-treated cultures (Fig. 3B). To further investigate whether TGF-β was required for HBeAg to induce conversion to Tregs, studies with TGF-βRI inhibitor in spleen cell culture were performed. It was observed that blocking of TGF-β signaling almost completely abolished the ability of HBeAg to induce conversion of T cells to Tregs (Fig. 3C and 3D). Thus, TGF-β is required to enable HBeAg to convert T cells to Tregs.
HBeAg converts T cells to Tregs in vivo
Whether HBeAg had the capacity to convert peripheral T cells into Tregs in vivo was then examined. HBeAg was subcutaneously injected into normal BALB/c mice. As shown in Fig. 4A and 4B, OVA or HBeAg treatment in vivo did not significantly change the percentage of CD4+ T cells in total lymphocytes. HBeAg treatment in vivo induced a pronounced increase in the percentage of Tregs within the CD4+ T cell population when compared to either OVA- or PBS-treated control (Fig. 4A and 4C). In addition, absolute numbers of Tregs in the spleens of HBeAg-injected mice increased consistently (Fig. 4D).
Discussion
CHB is characterized by HBeAg positivity. HBeAg has been shown to regulate the host immune response to maintain a tolerant state and promote HBV persistence in natural infection (13,23), but the mechanism by which HBeAg induces immune tolerance remains unclear. The mouse is an appropriate animal model for immunological studies (24), and the present study does not involve the investigation of HBV pathogenesis; thus, we used a murine experimental system to explore immunoregulatory function of HBeAg.
Among immunoregulatory cell populations, Tregs remain paramount in CHB patients (14). CHB patients, especially those with HBeAg positivity, exhibit a higher percentage of Tregs in their peripheral blood than those with HBeAg-negative CHB (15,19,20). Therefore, it was initially hypothesized that HBeAg was involved in the conversion of T cells to Tregs in CHB patients. A combination of in vitro and in vivo assays appeared to validate the hypothesis that HBeAg induced a significant increase in the proportion of Tregs isolated from mouse spleens. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to provide preliminary evidence for the contribution of HBeAg to Treg generation in patients with CHB. In addition, previous studies have suggested that efficient Treg induction requires low doses of antigens, which is possibly related to weak T cell receptor signaling (25-27). Consistently, in in vitro study, a dose of 1 µg/ml HBeAg was found to be more effective in the conversion of T cells to Tregs than that of 5 µg/ml, although the difference between the two was not statistically significant. The high dose (10 µg/ml) of HBeAg was found unable to induce the increase the number of Tregs, probably due to the induction of a strong T cell receptor stimulation.
Peripheral Treg differentiation is induced upon T cell activation with high-affinity agonist antigens (28,29). Predictions indicated multiple high-affinity potential MHC class II-binding epitopes on HBeAg. However, currently it was not possible to verify the most immunogenic epitopes that are predicted to be potentially responsible for naive CD4+ T cell activation and subsequent peripheral Treg differentiation in the present study. The naive CD4+ T cell population expresses a huge repertoire of receptors that are highly diverse in their epitope-binding sites (30). Only few naive CD4+ T cells can be reactive to a single HBeAg epitope, so it is likely that very few CD4+ T cells could be induced to differentiate into Tregs by a single epitope. HBeAg-mediated differentiation of T cells into Tregs may require a combination of multiple epitopes, in a complex process which merits further study.
Previous studies have revealed that high amounts of TGF-β are required for foreign antigen-mediated induction of Foxp3 expression in peripheral naive CD4+ T cells (29,31). Considering these findings, the present data suggested that HBeAg was able to trigger TGF-β production and indeed required to enable HBeAg to induce T cell conversion into Tregs in mouse spleen. Previous research has demonstrated that patients with CHB exhibit significantly higher serum levels of TGF-β than healthy people (32) and HBeAg may contribute to the elevated serum levels of TGF-β in patients with CHB. Diverse varieties of immune cells, such as macrophages, monocytes, NK cells and CD4+ T cells, are involved in the production of TGF-β during chronic HBV infection (33). However, which cells in the spleen that are primarily responsible for HBeAg-increased TGF-β production requires further investigation. The present data suggest that HBV exploits immune cells to create an TGF-β-rich microenvironment for peripheral Treg differentiation and HBV persistence, and are consistent with the notion that HBeAg can condition innate immune cells into anti-inflammatory types (34,35).
Although HBeAg is not required for HBV assembly, replication or viral infection, various studies have shown that HBeAg is capable of impairing innate immune responses or inactivating HBeAg-specific T cells by clonal deletion or anergy (34,36). The present study demonstrated the additional ability of HBeAg to convert CD4+CD25- T cells to CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs in vitro and suggest a mechanistic explanation for HBeAg, as an immune tolerogen, to modulate the host immune response and promote HBV chronicity. However, current data in mice are preliminary, and further investigation is needed to validate the T cell differentiating capabilities of HBeAg in HBV transgenic mice and to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms in future works.
In summary, the present murine experimental data indicate that HBeAg is able to convert T cells into Tregs in mouse spleen and suggest this may be due to the increased TGF-β production induced by HBeAg.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20170105) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81971963) to Professor Sha Zhou and from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81871675) to Professor Chuan Su.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
SZ and CS conceived and designed the study. RT, ZL, XW, QQ, JH, DL, XW and YL performed the experiments. SZ, XC, JZ and CS analyzed the data. SZ and CS wrote the paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures for the use of laboratory animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nanjing Medical University (permit no. IACUC-1601123).
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Seto WK, Lo YR, Pawlotsky JM and Yuen MF: Chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet. 392:2313–2324. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yuen MF, Chen DS, Dusheiko GM, Janssen HLA, Lau DTY, Locarnini SA, Peters MG and Lai CL: Hepatitis B virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 4(18035)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Maini MK and Pallett LJ: Defective T-cell immunity in hepatitis B virus infection: Why therapeutic vaccination needs a helping hand. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 3:192–202. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Park JJ, Wong DK, Wahed AS, Lee WM, Feld JJ, Terrault N, Khalili M, Sterling RK, Kowdley KV, et al: Hepatitis B virus--specific and global T-cell dysfunction in chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 150:684–695.e5. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bertoletti A and Naoumov NV: Translation of immunological knowledge into better treatments of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 39:115–124. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bertoletti A and Ferrari C: Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: Towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut. 61:1754–1764. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bertoletti A and Ferrari C: Kinetics of the immune response during HBV and HCV infection. Hepatology. 38:4–13. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chang C, Enders G, Sprengel R, Peters N, Varmus HE and Ganem D: Expression of the precore region of an avian hepatitis B virus is not required for viral replication. J Virol. 61:3322–3325. 1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen HS, Kew MC, Hornbuckle WE, Tennant BC, Cote PJ, Gerin JL, Purcell RH and Miller RH: The precore gene of the woodchuck hepatitis virus genome is not essential for viral replication in the natural host. J Virol. 66:5682–5684. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schlicht HJ, Salfeld J and Schaller H: The duck hepatitis B virus pre-C region encodes a signal sequence which is essential for synthesis and secretion of processed core proteins but not for virus formation. J Virol. 61:3701–3709. 1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Boni C, Laccabue D, Lampertico P, Giuberti T, Viganò M, Schivazappa S, Alfieri A, Pesci M, Gaeta GB, et al: Restored function of HBV-specific T cells after long-term effective therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues. Gastroenterology. 143:963–973.e9. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen M, Sällberg M, Hughes J, Jones J, Guidotti LG, Chisari FV, Billaud JN and Milich DR: Immune tolerance split between hepatitis B virus precore and core proteins. J Virol. 79:3016–3027. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Milich D and Liang TJ: Exploring the biological basis of hepatitis B e antigen in hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 38:1075–1086. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Manigold T and Racanelli V: T-cell regulation by CD4 regulatory T cells during hepatitis B and C virus infections: Facts and controversies. Lancet Infect Dis. 7:804–813. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stoop JN, van der Molen RG, Baan CC, van der Laan LJ, Kuipers EJ, Kusters JG and Janssen HL: Regulatory T cells contribute to the impaired immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 41:771–778. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Aalaei-Andabili SH and Alavian SM: Regulatory T cells are the most important determinant factor of hepatitis B infection prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. 30:5595–5602. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lin CY, Tsai MC, Huang CT, Hsu CW, Tseng SC, Tsai IF, Chen YC, Yeh CT, Sheen IS and Chien RN: Liver injury is associated with enhanced regulatory T-cell activity in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 14:503–511. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stoop JN, van der Molen RG, Kuipers EJ, Kusters JG and Janssen HL: Inhibition of viral replication reduces regulatory T cells and enhances the antiviral immune response in chronic hepatitis B. Virology. 361:141–148. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
El-Badawy O, Sayed D, Badary MS, Abd-Alrahman ME, El-Feky MA and Thabit AG: Relations of regulatory T cells with hepatitis markers in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hum Immunol. 73:335–341. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Peng G, Li S, Wu W, Sun Z, Chen Y and Chen Z: Circulating CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells correlate with chronic hepatitis B infection. Immunology. 123:57–65. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen W, Jin W, Hardegen N, Lei KJ, Li L, Marinos N, McGrady G and Wahl SM: Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25- naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-beta induction of transcription factor Foxp3. J Exp Med. 198:1875–1886. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Peng Y, Laouar Y, Li MO, Green EA and Flavell RA: TGF-beta regulates in vivo expansion of Foxp3-expressing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells responsible for protection against diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:4572–4577. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Maruyama T, Iino S, Koike K, Yasuda K and Milich DR: Serology of acute exacerbation in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology. 105:1141–1151. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Masopust D, Sivula CP and Jameson SC: Of mice, dirty mice, and men: Using mice To understand human immunology. J Immunol. 199:383–388. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Turner MS, Kane LP and Morel PA: Dominant role of antigen dose in CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell induction and expansion. J Immunol. 183:4895–4903. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shevach EM: From vanilla to 28 flavors: Multiple varieties of T regulatory cells. Immunity. 25:195–201. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kang J, Huddleston SJ, Fraser JM and Khoruts A: De novo induction of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in vivo following systemic antigen administration accompanied by blockade of mTOR. J Leukoc Biol. 83:1230–1239. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gottschalk RA, Corse E and Allison JP: TCR ligand density and affinity determine peripheral induction of Foxp3 in vivo. J Exp Med. 207:1701–1711. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li MO and Rudensky AY: T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 16:220–233. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Moon JJ, Chu HH, Pepper M, McSorley SJ, Jameson SC, Kedl RM and Jenkins MK: Naive CD4(+) T cell frequency varies for different epitopes and predicts repertoire diversity and response magnitude. Immunity. 27:203–213. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF and Rudensky AY: Regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 30:531–564. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Khorramdelazad H, Hassanshahi G, Nasiri Ahmadabadi B and Kazemi Arababadi M: High serum levels of TGF-β in Iranians with chronic HBV infection. Hepat Mon. 12(e7581)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li H, Zhai N, Wang Z, Song H, Yang Y, Cui A, Li T, Wang G, Niu J, Crispe IN, et al: Regulatory NK cells mediated between immunosuppressive monocytes and dysfunctional T cells in chronic HBV infection. Gut. 67:2035–2044. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tsai KN, Kuo CF and Ou JJ: Mechanisms of hepatitis B virus persistence. Trends Microbiol. 26:33–42. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yang F, Yu X, Zhou C, Mao R, Zhu M, Zhu H, Ma Z, Mitra B, Zhao G, et al: Hepatitis B e antigen induces the expansion of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells to dampen T-cell function in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 15(e1007690)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ciupe SM: Modeling the dynamics of hepatitis B infection, immunity, and drug therapy. Immunol Rev. 285:38–54. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |