This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a common life-threatening inflammatory condition that is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in addition to high costs (1), with >3 million ARDS cases and 75,000 deaths annually worldwide (2,3). The pathogenesis of ALI is highly complex. A number of studies have suggested that pulmonary edema and the hyperactivation of the innate immune response are closely associated with the onset of ALI (4,5). Environmental and internal factors such as infection and sepsis (6), can mediate tissue inflammation and subsequent damage by inducing the secretion of inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Dysregulation of this process can eventually lead to alveolar-capillary barrier disruption and pulmonary edema (7,8). MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are a type of small, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs that are 17-24 nucleotides in length and can modulate the expression of target genes on a post-transcriptional level (9,10). It has been reported that miRs serve an important role in the occurrence and progression of ALI (11). Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is a member of the conserved type I transmembrane proteins, which was first identified in microbes in 1980(12). TLR4 mainly mediates the recognition of pathogens to initiate the inflammation signaling pathway (13). Several members of these proteins have since been found in mammals, including and humans (14,15). Among them, TLR4 is a receptor that can recognize lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and plays a pivotal role in mediating lung injury (16). Upon activation, this upregulated state can then be modulated by several miRs, including miR-140, miR-181a and miR-182, via a negative feedback mechanism to inhibit inflammation (17-19)

Ventilation therapy approaches, such as mechanical ventilation with the use of low tidal volumes, have been developed for treating ALI (19). This method is designed to protect the lungs from excessive mechanical burden (19). It has also been documented that intratracheal installation of primary rat alveolar type II (ATII) cells in a rat ALI model can attenuate lung injury (20). However, the mechanistic details underlying the pathogenesis of ALI has not been fully elucidated. It was previously found that upregulation miR-16 can inhibit the inflammatory response in a ALI model of mouse (21). Therefore, the present study was undertaken to investigate whether miR-16 upregulation can attenuate the ALI-induced inflammatory responses. The role of miR-16 was investigated in a LPS-induced rat model of ALI, which aimed to uncover its underlying mechanisms of action and determine whether it is a potential target for the clinical therapy of ALI.

Materials and methods

Bioinformatics analysis

TargetScan database (release no. 7.2; https://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) was used to calculate the prediction of targets of miR-16.

Animals

In total, 10 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 240±20 g were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd and were kept in 23±2˚C with a 12-h light/dark cycle, 55-60% humidity, with ad libitum access to food and water. All the animal protocols (approval no. 2019-KY-005) were approved by The Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University, with all animal experiments performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (GB/T 35892-2018).

Establishment of LPS-induced lung injury rat model

LPS (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was diluted in PBS to a final concentration of 10 mg/ml. Rats were randomly divided into two groups. Rats in the LPS group (n=5) were administered LPS (0.1 mg/kg) through tracheal intubation after anesthesia using isoflurane inhalation at a dose of 4 and 2% for induction and maintenance, respectively, at a gas flow rate of 0.25 l/min (22). Rats in the control group were treated with the same volume of PBS alone. At 6 h following the establishment of the LPS-induced lung injury model, all rats were euthanized with intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital followed by cervical dislocation. Subsequently, peripheral blood and the lung tissues were collected from all rats.

Cell culture and transfection

The NHBE (cat. no. PCS-300-010) normal human bronchial epithelial cell line and 293T cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Cells were cultured in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin at 37˚C in a humified atmosphere of 5% CO2. miR-16 expression was tested in NHBE cells which was treated with LPS (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 16 µg/ml) for 12 h at 37˚C by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In addition, miR-16 expression was tested in NHBE cells that were incubated with 2 µg/ml LPS for a range of indicated time durations (0, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h) at 37˚C by RT-qPCR.

The group method of NHBE cells as follows: i) miR-NC group; ii) miR-NC + LPS group, where the cells were transfected with miR-NC and then treated with 2 µg/ml LPS; iii) miR-16 mimic group, where cells were transfected with the miR-16 mimic; iv) miR-16 mimic + LPS group, where cells were transfected with the miR-16 mimic and then treated with 2 µg/ml LPS; v) si-NC group; vi) si-NC + LPS group, where the NHBE cells were transfected with si-NC and then treated with 2 µg/ml LPS; vii) si-TLR4 group; viii) si-TLR4 + LPS group, where NHBE cells were transfected with si-TLR4 and then treated with 2 µg/ml LPS; and ix) miR-16 mimic + pcDNA TLR4 + LPS group, where cells were transfected with miR-16 mimic and pcDNA-TLR4 and then treated with 2 µg/ml LPS. All transfection experiments lasted 48 h.

Specific small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting TLR4, miR-16 mimics and negative control (NC) mimics (50 nM; Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) were transfected into NHBE cells for 48 h using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The sequences were as follows: MiR-16 mimics sense, 5'-UAGCAGCACGUAAAUAUUGGCG-3' and antisense, 5'-CGCCAAUAUUUACGUGCUGCUA-3'; miR-NC sense, UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3' and antisense, 5'-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3'; TLR4 siRNA sense, 5'-GGACAGCUUAUAACCUUAATT-3' and antisense, 5'-UUAAGGUUAUAAGCUGUCCTT-3' and siRNA-NC sense, 5'-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3' and antisense, 5'-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3'. Total RNA was extracted from NHBE cells using the TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) before the cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription using the random primer (cat. no. B300818-0100; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) and 5X AMV RT Buffer (cat. no. B610020-0500; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.), using the temperature protocol of 42˚C for 60 min and 72˚C for 10 min. The TLR4 target was obtained by PCR (Direct PCR Kit; cat. no. B639289; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) using TLR4-specific primers (TLR4 forward, 5'-AAAAGCTTGCCACCATGATGTCTGCCTCGCGCCTGG-3' and reverse, 5'-AAGGATCCTCAGATAGATGTTGCTTCCTGC-3'). The temperature protocol was 95˚C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 5 sec and 60˚C for 34 sec. The whole sequence of TLR4 was then sub-cloned into the pcDNA.3.1 vector (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) via the HindⅢ and BamHⅠ restriction sites to construct the TLR4 overexpression plasmid, which was also transfected into NHBE cells using Lipofectamine 2000(17).

Histological analysis

For histological analysis, the lung tissues from PBS- or LPS-treated rats were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at room temperature and embedded with paraffin. Subsequently, 4-µm sections of the lung tissues were dehydrated in an ascending ethanol gradient and then xylene and were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (23). At room temperature, the samples were stained with hematoxylin for 5 min and eosin for 1 min. Each slide was observed under light microscopy at x200 magnification. Representative images for each group are shown.

ELISA

The secretion levels of TNF-α (cat. no. E-EL-R0019c), IL-1β (cat. no. E-EL-H0149c) and IL-6 (cat. no. E-EL-H0102c) were determined using the corresponding ELISA kits (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) in peripheral blood samples of rats and cell culture medium of NHBE cells. All procedures were performed independently in triplicate according to manufacturer's protocol.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from the lung tissues of rats or NHBE cells using the TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). For miRNA analysis, cDNA was synthesized by M-MLV reverse transcriptase with a special reverse transcription primer for miRNAs (PrimeScript™ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit; cat. no. 6110A; Takara Bio, Inc.) using the protocol of 30˚C 10 min, 42˚C 60 min and 95˚C for 5 min. For mRNA analysis, cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (cat. no. RR037A; Takara Bio, Inc.) using the protocol of 16˚C for 30 min, 42˚C for 30 min and 85˚C 10 min. For miRNAs, qPCR was performed using Hairpin-it™ miRNAs qPCR Quantitation Kit (cat. no. QPM-010, Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.). The primer sequences of miR-16 used were the following: Forward, 5'-CGCGCTAGCAGCACGTAAAT-3' and reverse, 5'-GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3'; U6 forward, 5'-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3' and reverse, 5'-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3'. For mRNA, qPCR was performed using the LightCycler® RNA Master SYBR Green I (cat. no. 3064760001; Roche Diagnostics). The sequences of the primers were as follows: TLR4 forward, 5'-GGCTCCTGATGCAAGATGCCCCT-3' and reverse, 5'-CTGCCTTGAATACCTTCACACGT-3'; TNF-α forward, 5'-CTGGGACAGTGACCTGGACT-3' and reverse, 5'-GCACCTCAGGGAAGAGTCTG-3'; IL-1β forward, 5'-CCTCCTTGCCTCTGATGG-3' and reverse, 5'-AGTGCTGCCTAATGTCCC-3'; IL-6 forward, 5'-AGTTGCCTTCTTGGGACTGA-3' and reverse, 5'-TCCACGATTTCCCAGAGAAC-3' and GAPDH forward, 5'-CTGAGCACCAGGTGGTCTC-3' and reverse, 5'-CATGACAAGGTGCGGCTCC-3'. The thermocycling conditions were 95˚C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 5 sec and 60˚C and 34 sec. qPCR was performed using an ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Relative expression of miR-16 was normalized to that of U6, whereas the relative mRNA expression was normalized to GAPDH, both using the 2-ΔΔCq method (24-26).

Luciferase reporter assay

293T cells (1x105 cells) were co-transfected with 10 pmol/ml miR-16 mimics or miR-NC and pmirGLO3-TLR4-3'UTR-wild-type (Wt) or pmirGLO3-TLR4-3'UTR-mutant (MUT) (0.2 pmol/ml all from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) by Lipofectamine 2000. Following incubation for 48 h at 37˚C, the luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The results of firefly luciferase activity were normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity.

Western blot analysis

Total proteins of NHBE cells were extracted using a protein extraction kit (NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents; Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and the protein concentration was measured using bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). A 10% SDS-PAGE gel was prepared with 20 µg protein samples loaded in each lane. The samples were mixed with the loading buffer and boiled at 100˚C for 5 min. The protein on the gel was then transferred to a nitrocellulose membranes and blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder at room temperature 1 h. GAPDH primary antibody (cat. no. ab70699; 1:5,000; Abcam) was chosen as the internal reference. The membranes were first probed with the anti-TLR4 mouse polyclonal antibody incubated at 4˚C overnight (cat. no. sc-293072; dilution 1:1,500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and then with a corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (cat. no. sc-525409; 1:5,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at room temperature for 1.5 h. An enhanced chemiluminescence kit (EMD Millipore) was used for visualization of the results and quantification of the bands was performed using the Image J software (v1.8.0; National Institutes of Health).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student's t-test for comparisons between two groups. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used for multiple group comparisons using the SPSS software (version 17.0; SPSS, Inc.) Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-16 expression is downregulated in the lung tissues of ALI rats and LPS-induced NHBE cells

An ALI rat model was established by LPS, whilst animals treated with PBS served as control. The lung tissues from the LPS group showed lung injury, including hemorrhage, interstitial edema and infiltration of inflammatory cells (Fig. 1A). Subsequent RT-qPCR analysis showed that the expression of miR-16 was significantly decreased in the lung tissues of rats treated with LPS compared with that in control tissues treated with PBS (Fig. 1B). ELISA results revealed that the secretion levels of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly increased in the peripheral blood of LPS-treated rats compared with those in the control PBS group (Fig. 1C-E).

Figure 1 Treatment of rats and NHBE cells with LPS downregulates miR-16 expression. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed histological differences between the lung tissues from rats in the LPS and control groups. The lung tissues from the LPS group showed lung injury, including hemorrhage (clear arrow), interstitial edema (red arrow) and infiltration of inflammatory cells (black arrow). Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Differences in miR-16 expression between rats in the LPS and control groups were assessed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. The levels of (C) TNF-α, (D) IL-1β and (E) IL-6 were measured in rats treated with LPS or PBS (control) using ELISA. *P<0.05 vs. Control. (F) miR-16 expression was decreased following treatment of NHBE cells with increasing concentrations of LPS (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 16 µg/ml) for 12 h as assessed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. *P<0.05 vs. 0 group. (G) miR-16 expression was gradually reduced in NHBE cells incubated with 2 µg/ml LPS for a range of indicated time durations (0, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h) as assessed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. *P<0.05 vs. 0 group. *P<0.05. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ALI, acute lung injury; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IL, interleukin; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial; NC, negative control; miR, microRNA.

In NHBE cells treated with different concentrations (Fig. 1F) of LPS for different time periods (Fig. 1G), the expression levels of miR-16 were markedly decreased compared with those in the 0 group. These data suggested a potential association between the expression of miR-16 and the LPS-induced inflammatory response in the lung.

miR-16 attenuates the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by LPS-induced NHBE cells

To investigate the role of miR-16 in ALI, NHBE cells were transfected with either miR-16 mimics or miR-NC, which significantly increased miR-16 expression compared with that in the miR-NC group (Fig. 2A). The secretion levels of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 were determined by ELISA in cell culture supernatant treated for 12 h with LPS (2 µg/ml) and control cells after transfection. The results demonstrated that the secretion levels of proinflammatory cytokines were markedly reduced in cells in the miR-16 mimic + LPS group compared with those in the miR-NC + LPS group (Fig. 2B-D). Additionally, mRNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 were also assessed by RT-qPCR in NHBE cells (Fig. 2E-G). Consistent with the ELISA data, the expression levels of the proinflammatory cytokines were also decreased in the miR-16 mimic + LPS group compared with those in the miR-NC + LPS group. These findings suggest that miR-16 can negatively regulate the expression of inflammatory factors. However, whether miR-16 can directly target these inflammatory cytokines requires further investigation.

Figure 2 miR-16 overexpression attenuates LPS-induced secretion of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6. NHBE cells were treated with 2 µg/ml LPS for 12 h after transfection 48 h. (A) Transfection of NHBE cells with miR-16 mimics sufficiently overexpressed miR-16. *P<0.05 vs. miR-NC. Secretion of (B) TNF-α, (C) IL-1β and (D) IL-6 by NHBE cells was determined following cell transfection with miR-16 mimics for 48 h using ELISA. mRNA expression levels of (E) TNF-α, (F) IL-1β and (G) IL-6 were measured in NHBE cells by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. *P<0.05. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IL-1β, interleukin 1β; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial; NC, negative control; miR, microRNA.

TLR4 is directly targeted by miR-16

A conserved binding region between the 3'-UTR of TLR4 mRNA and miR-16 was identified by TargetScan analysis (Fig. 3A). It was therefore hypothesized that miR-16 could directly target TLR4. Western blot analysis revealed that TLR4 was downregulated in NHBE cells transfected with miR-16 mimics compared with that in cells transfected with miR-NC (Fig. 3C). To verify if TLR4 can be directly targeted by miR-16 in vitro, a luciferase reporter assay was performed. The data revealed that the luciferase activity of the pmirGLO3-TLR4-3'-UTR-Wt reporter was significantly suppressed in the miR-16 mimics group compared with the that in miR-NC group (Fig. 3B). However, miR-16 mimic had no effect on the luciferase activity of the pmirGLO3-TLR4-3'-UTR-MUT construct (Fig. 3B). These findings indicated that miR-16 could directly target TLR4 3'-UTR to suppress its expression on the post-transcriptional level.

Figure 3 miR-16 directly targets TLR4. (A) A specific binding site of miR-16 was identified within the 3'-UTR of TLR4 using Targetscan bioinformatics analysis. (B) Luciferase reporter assay was used to verify if miR-16 could directly target the TLR4 3'-UTR in 293T cells. (C) Western blot analysis for TLR4 protein expression after miR-16 mimic transfection in NHBE cells. *P<0.05 (compare with wild NC group). 3'-UTR, 3'-untranslated region; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control.

TLR4 silencing alleviates LPS-induced inflammatory responses

To further evaluate the effect of TLR4 on LPS-induced inflammatory responses, cells were transfected with specific siRNAs targeting TLR4. A shown in Fig. 4A, transfection of cells with si-TLR4 significantly downregulated TLR4 protein expression compared with that in cells transfected with si-NC. TLR4 knockdown also significantly attenuated the LPS-induced secretion of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 by NHBE cells compared with those in LPS-treated cells transfected with si-NC (Fig. 4B-D). Therefore, these data suggested that TLR4 knockdown could reduce the production of proinflammatory cytokines.

Figure 4 TLR4 knockdown alleviates LPS-induced inflammatory factors secretion from NHBE cells. (A) Western blot analysis for TLR4 protein expression after transfection with si-TLR4. The secretion levels of (B) TNF-α, (C) IL-1β and (D) IL-6 were measured by ELISA following transfection of NHBE cells with si-TLR4 or si-NC for 48 h. *P<0.05. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IL, interleukin; si, small interfering; NC, negative control; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial.

miR-16 regulates inflammatory responses to LPS in NHBE cells by targeting TLR4

Subsequently, TLR4 was overexpressed in NHBE cells that were also transfected with miR-16 mimics to investigate whether miR-16 could regulate the inflammatory responses by targeting TLR4. Following transfection with miR-16 mimics and or pcDNA3.1-TLR4, cells were treated with LPS (2 µg/ml) before the levels of the proinflammatory cytokines were measured by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 5A-C, cell treatment with LPS increased the secretion levels of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 compared with those in the control, which were reversed by miR-16 overexpression compared with those in the LPS + miR-NC. However, the protective mechanism of miR-16 against this particular inflammatory response as reported by IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly negated following TLR4 overexpression. Strict transfection efficiency controls were also set up (Fig. S1). To conclude, these aforementioned findings suggested that miR-16 may suppress the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by targeting TLR4.

Figure 5 miR-16 exerts protective effects against ALI-induced inflammatory responses by modulating TLR4 expression. Secretion levels of (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-1β and (C) IL-6 were assessed by ELISA after co-transfection and LPS treatment. *P<0.05. ALI, acute lung injury; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IL-1β, interleukin 1β.

Discussion

ALI is an inflammatory pulmonary condition that is characterized by refractory hypoxemia and dyspnea, with substantial risk of mortality (3). However, the mechanism underlying ALI remains poorly understood (27). It has been previously reported that inflammatory disorders and alveolar barrier disruption are the main causes of ALI (28). Therefore, inhibiting inflammatory responses can be considered to effectively improve LPS-induced ALI (29). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is considered to be severe type of ALI (3,30). In 2003, a number of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) died from ARDS (31,32). In addition, since the end of 2019, a severe pneumonia caused coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. This disease is caused by the SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is similar to SARS-CoV (33). The majority of patients with COVID-19 suffer from a series of systemic symptoms, which may progress into ARDS (34). However, a number of studies have shown that the TLR4 signaling pathway can control the progress of ALI (32,35).

TLR4 serves an essential role in the immne and inflammatory response (36). TLR4 is not only involved in acquired immunity, but also in innate immunity (37). LPS is a component of the bacterial endotoxin that can activate TLR4 via the TLR4/myeloid differentiation primary response 88 or TLR4/TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β/tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 pathway to promote inflammation in the lungs (38). Therefore, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 may be produced and aggravate ALI (27). Additionally, suppression of TLR4 may be associated with the alleviation of inflammatory reactions in a mouse lung injury model induced by LPS (39). Consistent with this hypothesis, it was previously demonstrated that dioscin (40), 25-hydroxycholesterol (41) and antagonists of the TLR4 signaling may alleviate LPS-induced ALI (42).

miRNAs have become a popular topic of scientific research, due to reports of their involvement in several biological processes, including cell apoptosis, proliferation and tumorigenesis (43). Therefore, it has been suggested that miRNAs may act as regulatory factors that can reduce the risk of a various diseases and improve the efficacy of therapy by regulating the expression of target mRNAs (44). For example, a previous study revealed that miR-302b could inhibit alveolar macrophages and epithelial cell inflammatory responses against bacterial infections by providing negative feedback to TLRs-mediated immunity (45). Another study reported that miR-203 inhibited ovarian tumor metastasis by targeting the transforming growth factor-β pathway (46). Furthermore, miRNAs may be associated with the release of inflammatory cytokines. It has been documented that miR-182-5p (47), miR-106a (24) and miR-302b (45) upregulate the expression levels of inflammatory cytokines by targeting TLR4 to promote lung injury. miR-183-5p overexpression was previously reported to downregulate TLR4, which lead to the inhibition of inflammatory cytokine secretion (48). It has also been previously suggested that miR-16 may be used as a prognostic biomarker for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), since miR-16 downregulated bcl-2 expression to induce apoptosis in B-cell CLL (49). In addition, another study suggested that miR-16 may improve the prognosis of malignant mesothelioma, where after delivery of a miR-16 TargomiR, patients assessed by CT achieved disease control (50). Although some molecular mechanisms remain unknown, it is becoming well supported that miR-16 serves an significant role in the progression of several diseases. However, the role of miR-16 in LPS-induced ALI remains unclear.

A similar study has been recently published by Yang et al (21), which reported that upregulation of miR-16 can inhibit the expression of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 3(NPRP3) inflammasome via TLR4 in A549 cells and a ALI model (21). However, this previous study did not perform rescue experiments to prove that TLR4 is an essential component, where miR-16 may regulate the NLRP3 inflammasome via other pathways. The present study used pcDNA3.1-TLR4 to confirm that TLR4 overexpression can reverse the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines caused by miR-16 overexpression. Also in the present study the ELISA results demonstrated that LPS-induced NHBE cells secreted increased levels of the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6. However, miR-16 overexpression reduced the levels of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6, whilst this reduction in inflammatory cytokine secretion was negated when miR-16 and TLR4 were simultaneously overexpressed. RT-qPCR analysis revealed that miR-16 overexpression suppressed the expression of TLR4. Subsequently, the present study investigated the mechanism underlying the inhibitory effects of miR-16 on the inflammatory response. The results revealed that TLR4 downregulation downstream of miR-16 attenuated the inflammatory response in NHBE. Unfortunately, the protective effect of miR-16 was not verified in the animal experiments, which is a limitation of the present study. However, data from the present study appeared to be consistent with the data from the animal experiments previously performed by Yang et al (21), which provide support for the present findings.

To conclude, the present study demonstrated that miR-16 exerted its protective effects against ALI-induced inflammatory responses by modulating TLR4. The effective control of ALI remains challenging. miR-16 may provide reference for the clinical treatment of ALI, or even ARDS. Finally, although the present study demonstrated that miR-16 may play a key role in regulating LPS-induced ALI, further extensive scientific research is required before these findings will be applicable in clinical practice.

Supplementary Material

Transfection efficiency of miR-16 and TLR4 in NHBE cells. (A) Expression levels of miR-16: i) The levels of miR-16 was upregulated after cells were transfected with the miR-16 mimic compared with miR-NC; ii) miR-16 expression was downregulated in LPS-treated NHBE cells, which was reversed by transfection with the miR-16 mimic compared with the miR-NC + LPS group; and iii) transfection with pcDNA.3.1-TLR4 alone exerted no significant effects on the expression levels of miR-16 regardless of LPS presence. (B) Expression levels of TLR4: i) Without LPS treatment, the protein expression levels of TLR4 was significantly increased in NHBE following pcDNA-TLR4 transfection compared with the pcDNA3.1-NC group; ii) in the absence of LPS treatment, TLR4 expression was significantly downregulated by miR-16 mimic transfection in NHBE cells compared with the miR-NC group; iii) There was no significant effect on TLR4 expression after stimulation by LPS alone; iv) TLR4 protein expression was significantly increased in LPS-treated NHBE cells following pcDNA-TLR4 transfection compared with the pcDNA3.1-NC + LPS group; and v) TLR4 expression was decreased in LPS-treated NHBE cells following miR-16 mimic and pcDNA.3.1-TLR4 co-transfection compared with the pcDNA3.1-TLR4 + LPS group miR, microRNA; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial cells; LPS, lipopolysaccharide. *P<0.05. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study is supported by the project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81972182).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HW conceived and designed the experiments. XL and QC performed the experiments. XL and HW analyzed the data. XL and HW can authenticate the raw data in this study. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee Of The First Affiliated Hospital Of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) and all animal experiments were operated according to National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References