Open Access

Early metabolic alterations in the normal‑appearing grey and white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A proton MR spectroscopic study

  • Authors:
    • Dimitrios Tzanetakos
    • Andreas Kyrozis
    • Efstratios Karavasilis
    • Georgios Velonakis
    • John S. Tzartos
    • Panagiotis Toulas
    • Stefania Alexia Sotirli
    • Ioannis Evdokimidis
    • Georgios Tsivgoulis
    • Constantin Potagas
    • Costantinos Kilidireas
    • Elisabeth Andreadou
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 30, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12048
  • Article Number: 349
  • Copyright: © Tzanetakos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H‑MRS) is an advanced method of examining metabolic profiles. The present study aimed to assess in vivo metabolite levels in areas of normal‑appearing grey (thalamus) and white matter (centrum semiovale) using 1H‑MRS in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of multiple sclerosis and compare them to healthy controls (HCs). Data from 35 patients with CIS (CIS group), of which 23 were untreated (CIS‑untreated group) and 12 were treated (CIS‑treated group) with disease‑modifying‑therapies (DMTs) at the time of 1H‑MRS, and from 28 age‑ and sex‑matched HCs were collected using a 3.0 T MRI and single‑voxel 1H‑MRS (point resolved spectroscopy sequence; repetition time, 2,000 msec; time to echo, 35 msec). Concentrations and ratios of total N‑acetyl aspartate (tNAA), total creatine (tCr), total choline (tCho), myoinositol, glutamate (Glu), glutamine (Gln), Glu + Gln (Glx) and glutathione (Glth) were estimated in the thalamic‑voxel (th) and centrum semiovale‑voxel (cs). For the CIS group, the median duration from the first clinical attack to 1H‑MRS was 102 days (interquartile range, 89.5.‑131.5). Compared with HCs, significantly lower Glx(cs) (P=0.014) and ratios of tCho/tCr(th) (P=0.026), Glu/tCr(cs) (P=0.040), Glx/tCr(cs) (P=0.004), Glx/tNAA(th) (P=0.043) and Glx/tNAA(cs) (P=0.015) were observed in the CIS group. No differences in tNAA levels were observed between the CIS and the HC groups; however, tNAA(cs) was higher in the CIS‑treated than in the CIS‑untreated group (P=0.028). Compared with those in HC group, decreased Glu(cs) (P=0.019) and Glx(cs) levels (P=0.014) and lower ratios for tCho/tCr(th) (P=0.015), Gln/tCr(th) (P=0.004), Glu/tCr(cs) (P=0.021), Glx/tCr(th) (P=0.041), Glx/tCr(cs) (P=0.003), Glx/tNAA(th) (P=0.030) and Glx/tNAA(cs) (P=0.015) were found in the CIS‑untreated group. The present findings showed alterations in the normal‑appearing grey and white matter of patients with CIS; moreover, the present results suggested an early indirect treatment effect of DMTs on the brain metabolic profile of these patients.

Introduction

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in multiple sclerosis (MS) are oriented toward recognizing mainly structural abnormalities since they are focused on morphology and topographical changes of the MRI signal, thus failing to identify subtle and/or diffuse abnormalities in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and normal-appearing grey matter (NAGM) that are not visible with the use of conventional MRI (1). However, changes in NAWM and NAGM, including deep GM nuclei like the thalamus, have been described in neuropathological studies and can be present from the early stages of MS (2-4). In particular, the thalamus is frequently affected during the MS pathogenetic process, being a key site of demyelination and neurodegeneration (such as brain atrophy) (5,6). In studying the early clinical stage of MS, the clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), e.g. the first clinical episode with characteristics of inflammatory demyelination on the brain and/or spinal MRI suggestive of MS) (7), holds interest. Notably, the estimated risk for CIS to progress to MS has been estimated as 42-82% (8) depending on the follow-up duration.

The aforementioned limitations of conventional MRI in the study of normal-appearing (NA) tissue could be partially overcome with the use of other MRI techniques such as proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), a non-invasive advanced method that can be considered a ‘metabolic biopsy’. Specifically, 1H-MRS is capable of detecting certain metabolite peaks from a region of interest and quantifying the concentrations of these metabolites by measuring regional tissue metabolism (9-12). Particularly in MS, 1H-MRS enables examination of neurometabolic profiles that may be altered during the pathogenesis of the disease in the brain and spine; moreover, depending on the voxel placement it can examine not only regions with visible lesions on conventional MRI but also NA ones, thus assessing indirectly the degree of tissue damage based on the calculated biochemical changes (10,13-15).

A variety of metabolites of the central nervous system (CNS) can be detected and quantified with 1H-MRS including N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), choline (Cho), glutamine (Gln) and glutamate (Glu), myoinositol (mIns) and glutathione (Glth) (9,10,16,17). NAA is one of the most common compounds assessed by 1H-MRS; it is produced by mitochondria, localized in neuronal cell bodies and found in high concentrations in oligodendrocytes/myelin (18). It is considered a marker of neuronal viability. Reduced NAA levels are reported specifically in MS, which is usually interpreted as an indirect reflection of neuronal/axonal dysfunction or loss (19). The neurometabolite Cr was shown to be linked with cellular energy metabolism in metabolically active tissue such as the brain; the influence of the demyelinating process in Cr concentration is ambiguous since both diminished and increased levels were previously demonstrated (10). Another key molecule examined using 1H-MRS is Cho. Cho-containing compounds are considered precursors but also products of cellular membrane turnover, having been reported in different studies on patients with relapsing and/or progressive MS either as high (10,19,20) or as low (10) levels and possibly attributed to inflammation, demyelination and/or remyelination. Glu is one of the main excitatory neurotransmitters in the CNS, with a molecular structure similar to Gln, participating in the interplay of the Glu/Gln cycle between neurons and surrounding astrocytes (21). Data on Glu remain unclear in MS spectroscopy; both normal and increased levels have been reported in white matter lesions and NAWM (22), while also decreased levels in mixed grey and white matter (WM) tissue (23,24). The mIns is another peak on the 1H-MRS spectrum and is considered a marker of glia, a key molecule in cellular signaling systems, and also an organic osmolyte (14). The levels of mIns are increased in several 1H-MRS MS studies (10,25,26). Glth is considered a 'protective' metabolite against oxidative stress and is synthesized mainly by glia; Glth levels are reported to be higher in astrocytes than in neurons (27,28) At present, to the best of our knowledge, only a few 1H-MRS studies have estimated Glth in MS and decreased levels are observed in patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) (29,30).

To the best of our knowledge, the existing literature on 1H-MRS of patients with CIS is very limited, with only a few studies (31-35) reporting neurometabolic alterations compared with healthy controls (HCs). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the metabolic signatures of brain NAWM and NAGM in patients with CIS, focusing on possible underlying biochemical alterations that could be present in the NA areas on conventional MRI and also to identify possible markers of early cellular changes that may precede severe inflammation and degeneration by comparing metabolite concentrations of participants with CIS with those of HCs.

Materials and methods

Study population

The present study enrolled prospectively 38 consecutive female and male patients with CIS (CIS group), aged 18-50 years, diagnosed and recruited at the First Department of Neurology at Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece. In addition, 29 age- and sex-matched HCs with no past medical history were also recruited (HC group). Inclusion criteria for the CIS group were as follows: i) History of a single clinical attack within 6 months before 1H-MRS acquisition with objective clinical evidence of at least one lesion due to an acute inflammatory demyelinating event in the CNS with a duration ≥24 h in the absence of fever or infection (36,37); ii) baseline brain and spinal MRI scans at CIS onset demonstrating T2-weighted lesions in ≥1 of the four typical CNS locations for MS (periventricular, infratentorial, juxtacortical or spinal cord) according to the 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria (37); iii) absence of thalamic lesions on baseline brain MRI and iv) aged 18-50 years. Exclusion criteria were as follows: i) a clinical relapse or administration of oral or intravenous corticosteroids within 4 weeks preceding 1H-MRS acquisition; ii) history of other medical conditions associated with WM brain lesions (e.g. presence of multiple vascular risk factors, substance abuse) and iii) pregnancy. All differential diagnoses of CIS/MS, including other autoimmune inflammatory diseases of the CNS and infectious or vascular diseases were excluded by appropriate blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) laboratory tests.

The MRI/1H-MRS studies were performed from October 2015 to January 2017; moreover, on the date of the scan, all patients with CIS had a history of ≤6 months from the first clinical attack and all participants were evaluated by a neurologist at the Eginition Hospital (DT) including neurological examination. Assessment of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (38) was also performed for the CIS group. All participants provided written informed consent for participation in the study and publication of data. Written approval of the study protocol was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Eginition Hospital (approval no. 518/5.10.2015).

Imaging techniques and data analysis

All participants underwent brain MRI using a 3.0 T MRI Philips manufactured scanner (Achieva 3T TX; Philips Healthcare) equipped with an eight-channel head receive coil. The brain imaging protocol included a T2-weighted fluid-attenuation-inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequence in the axial plane [repetition time (TR), 11,000 msec; inversion time (TI), 2,800 msec; echo time (TE), 125 msec; voxel size, 0.45x0.45x4.00 mm; scanning time, 3 min 40 sec] for lesion detection and a high-resolution three dimensional (3D)-T1-weighted turbo field echo (3D-T1w) in the sagittal plane (TR, 9.9 msec; TE, 3.7 msec; voxel size: 1.0x1.00x1.00 mm; scanning time, 6 min) to obtain morphological images and also spectroscopic sequences.

1H-MRS protocol

Single voxel 1H-MRS spectroscopic data were acquired using point resolved spectroscopy sequence, receiving 1,024 samples with 2,000 Hz spectral bandwidth, 2,000 msec TR, 35 msec TE, 128 averages combined with excitation water suppression technique (scanning time, ~5 min). For each participant, two 1H-MRS-voxels were located, one in the left thalamus and the other in the left centrum semiovale (CS), adjusting their dimensions to maximize the volume while avoiding contamination from neighboring structures or lesions; thereby only NAGM and NAWM were included, respectively. In the CIS group, in case an increased lesion load was detected in the left CS on T2/FLAIR images, the voxel was located on the right CS provided that no lesions were included.

1H-MRS data analysis

The 1H-MRS spectroscopy data were processed with TARQUIN software (version no. 4.3.10; tarquin.sourceforge.net/index.php) following the standard procedure implemented in the toolbox (39,40) Briefly, preprocessing stages included: i) Subtraction of the post-acquisition residual water by applying a signal model that contained a range of frequencies (-fs/2,+45 Hz), where fs is the sampling frequency from the free induction decay nuclear medicine resonance signal; ii) phase adjustment applying a zero and first-order phase correction to the undergoing signal and iii) automatic referencing to optimal signal fitting. Subsequently, the TARQUIN algorithm using the basing simulated set of brain metabolites was applied to solve the non-linear least squares fitting problem providing metabolite concentrations. To gain reliable spectral data the following inclusion criteria were defined: Signal-to-noise ratio >5 (Q), fit quality <2.5 (index provided by TARQUIN) and absence of visually detected baseline abnormalities and artifacts. Specifically, the absolute concentrations of eight metabolites were estimated: i) total (t)NAA; ii) tCr; iii) tCho; iv) mIns; v) Gln; vi) Glu, vii) Gln + Glu (Glx) and viii) Glth.

Statistical analysis

Preliminary testing showed that metabolite concentrations and metabolite concentration ratios within groups were not normally distributed. Therefore, the non-parametric method of quantile regression was used to compare median values between the following groups: i) CIS vs. HC; ii) CIS-treated with disease modifying therapies (DMTs) at 1H-MRS acquisition vs. CIS-untreated and iii) CIS-untreated vs. HC. The STATA statistical software package (version no. 13; StataCorp LP) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics

Following the initial evaluation of the MRI data and 1H-MRS spectra, four participants were excluded from the analysis, of whom three were patients with CIS and artifacts were affecting spectral quality and one was a participant from the HC group with WM brain lesions detected οn FLAIR images. In the CIS group, no thalamic lesions were identified on FLAIR and 3D-T1w images, a finding in accordance with their baseline MRI scan. Accordingly, the analysis included 35 patients with CIS and 28 HCs; the CIS group included 23 females and 12 males with a median age of 32 years and an interquartile range (IQR) of 27.00-36.50 years, whereas the HC group contained 20 females and 8 males with a median age of 32 years and IQR of 28.75-36.25 years.

The clinical presentations at first clinical attack for the participants in the CIS group were typical for CNS demyelination (37): Unilateral optic neuritis (n=8); brainstem syndrome (n=3); myelitis (n=16); ataxic syndrome (n=1); isolated sensory symptoms due to a cerebral lesion (n=3); multifocal/polysymptomatic (n=2) and symptoms of undetermined location (n=2). A total of 30 patients fulfilled the criteria for dissemination in space (DIS), 15 for dissemination in time (DIT), and 14 for DIS and DIT according to 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria (37). In addition, lesions in the cervical and/or thoracic spine were identified in 27 patients with CIS on their baseline MRI scan before 1H-MRS examination. Regarding CSF findings, of 30 patients with CIS who underwent lumbar puncture, oligoclonal bands were detected in 26 and elevated IgG index (>0.65) in 21. At the 1H-MRS, the median duration from the CIS onset (first clinical attack) was 102 days and the median EDSS score date was 1 for the CIS group. DMTs were started in the majority of the patients with CIS that met the DIS and DIT criteria for MS. Specifically, 12 out of 14 patients fulfilling the DIS and DIT criteria were receiving DMTs at the time of the 1H-MRS acquisition; these included interferon β-1a (n=7); peginterferon β-1a (n=1); glatiramer acetate (n=2); natalizumab (n=1) and dimethyl fumarate (n=1). Treatment duration was short with a median of 23.50 days (IQR, 12.00-35.50). The demographic, clinical and laboratory features of the CIS group are summarized in Table I.

Table I

Demographic, clinical, and laboratory features of the CIS group.

Table I

Demographic, clinical, and laboratory features of the CIS group.

CharacteristicPatients (n=35)
Female/male ratio, (%)23/35 (65.70)
Caucasian (%)35(100)
Median (IQR) age at MRI/1H-MRS acquisition, years32 (27.00-36.50)
Median (IQR) duration from the CIS onset (first clinical attack) to 1H-MRS acquisition, days102 (89.50-131.50)
Median (IQR) EDSS score at 1H-MRS acquisition1 (1.00-1.50)
Number of patients with CIS and spinal cord lesions27
Number of patients with CSF-OCBs26
Number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIS30
Number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIT15
Number of patients fulfilling the criteria for DIS and DIT14
Number of patients treated with DMTs at the time of 1H-MRS acquisition12
Median (IQR) DMT duration, days23.50 (12.00-35.50)

[i] CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; IQR, interquartile range; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; CSF-OCBs, cerebrospinal fluid-oligoclonal bands; DIS, dissemination in space; DIT, dissemination in time; DMT, disease-modifying therapy.

1H-MRS

For the CIS group, the median 1H-MRS voxel size for the thalamus was 1.3 cm3 (IQR, 0.95-1.55) and for the CS 3.62 cm3 (IQR, 3.22-4.11). Similar values were noted for the HC group with thalamic-voxel (th) 1.29 cm3 (IQR, 1.08-1.64) and CS-voxel (cs) 3.88 cm3 (IQR, 2.99-4.45). Representative 1H-MRS voxels and spectra from two participants in the CIS group are shown in Fig. 1. The estimated concentrations of tNAA, tCr, tCho and mIns in 'th' and 'cs' did not differ significantly between the CIS and HC groups. Concentrations of Gln(th), Gln(cs), Glu(th), Glu(cs), Glx(th) and Glx(cs) were lower in the CIS group than the HC group, however, only Glx(cs) was significantly decreased. Additionally, the concentration of Glth was increased in the CIS group compared with that in HCs in both applied voxels, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The 1H-MRS metabolite concentrations in the CIS and HC groups are represented in Table II and Fig. 2A. Ratio of tNAA, tCho, mIns, Gln, Glu, Glx and Glth concentrations relative to tCr concentration and also the ratio of Glx and Glth concentrations relative to tNAA concentration were evaluated; significantly lower ratios of tCho/tCr(th), Glu/tCr(cs), Glx/tCr(cs), Glx/tNAA(th) and Glx/tNAA(cs) were observed in patients with CIS compared with those in the HC group (Table II; Fig. 2B).

Table II

1H-MRS metabolite concentrations and ratios in the CIS and HC groups.

Table II

1H-MRS metabolite concentrations and ratios in the CIS and HC groups.

A, Median concentration (IQR), mM
MetaboliteCIS group (n=35)HC group (n=28)P-value
tNAA(th)4.55 (2.60-5.36)5.23 (2.90-5.95)0.114
tNAA(cs)6.33 (5.46-7.11)6.08 (4.88-6.93)0.557
tCr(th)5.39 (4.02-6.52)5.49 (4.67-6.18)0.952
tCr(cs)5.03 (4.55-5.56)4.96 (4.67-5.38)0.724
tCho(th)1.53 (1.06-1.86)1.66 (1.29-1.88)0.535
tCho(cs)1.92 (1.80-2.09)1.91 (1.78-2.12)0.908
mIns(th)3.40 (1.79-4.93)2.56 (1.86-3.40)0.252
mIns(cs)2.90 (2.46-3.56)2.93 (2.57-3.48)0.853
Gln(th)2.47 (0.42-3.42)3.64 (2.31-4.67)0.156
Gln(cs)1.99 (0.42-3.48)2.74 (2.36-4.49)0.335
Glu(th)4.37 (1.13-6.10)4.69 (1.10-6.42)0.736
Glu(cs)3.41 (2.59-4.81)4.07 (3.59-5.64)0.129
Glx(th)6.58 (3.17-9.55)8.53 (4.55-11.10)0.292
Glx(cs)5.26 (3.17-8.737.59 (6.06-8.71)0.014a
Glth(th)0.68 (0.27-0.97)0.46 (0.00-1.14)0.100
Glth(cs)0.55 (0.36-0.72)0.44 (0.29-0.66)0.741
B, Median ratio (IQR)
MetaboliteCIS group (n=35)HC group (n=28)P-value
tNAA/tCr(th)0.79 (0.53-0.96)0.876 (0.52-1.08)0.283
tNAA/tCr(cs)1.29 (1.08-1.40)1.26 (1.03-1.46)0.675
tCho/tCr(th)0.26 (0.22-0.31)0.29 (0.27-0.33)0.026a
tCho/tCr(cs)0.38 (0.35-0.42)0.38 (0.36-0.40)0.431
mIns/tCr(th)0.57 (0.37-0.72)0.48 (0.35-0.73)0.505
mIns/tCr(cs)0.57 (0.46-0.69)0.58 (0.51-0.68)0.678
Gln/tCr(th)0.46 (0.09-0.65)0.62 (0.45-0.90)0.166
Gln/tCr(cs)0.41 (0.05-0.69)0.55 (0.47-0.91)0.387
Glu/tCr(th)0.59 (0.32-1.04)0.90 (0.10-1.36)0.399
Glu/tCr(cs)0.66 (0.55-0.86)0.87 (0.69-1.11)0.040a
Glx/tCr(th)1.14 (0.56-1.78)1.40 (0.89-2.01)0.573
Glx/tCr(cs)0.99 (0.67-1.54)1.52 (1.25-1.78)0.004a
Glth/tCr(th)0.12 (0.06-0.20)0.07 (0.00-0.20)0.197
Glth/tCr(cs)0.10 (0.07-0.14)0.09 (0.06-0.13)0.514
Glx/tNAA(th)1.23 (0.92-2.23)1.95 (1.28-2.74)0.043a
Glx/tNAA(cs)0.95 (0.65-1.23)1.35 (0.93-1.59)0.015a
Glth/tNAA(th)0.17 (0.06-0.25)0.07 (0.00-0.20)0.106
Glth/tNAA(cs)0.08 (0.06-0.12)0.07 (0.04-0.12)0.748

[i] aP<0.05. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; HC, healthy control; 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; IQR, interquartile range; (th), thalamic-voxel; (cs), centrum semiovale-voxel; tNAA, total N-acetyl aspartate; tCr, total creatine; tCho, total choline; mIns; myoinositol; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; Glx, glutamate + glutamine; Glth, glutathione.

The present study also investigated if the use of DMTs could have an early indirect impact on metabolic 1H-MRS profiles. Accordingly, the estimated metabolite concentrations and ratios in patients with CIS who received DMTs (CIS-treated group, n=12) were compared with patients with CIS who were DMT-naïve at the 1H-MRS acquisition (CIS-untreated group, n=23). In the CIS-treated-group tNAA(cs) was significantly higher and tCr(cs) was also elevated showing a trend toward significance (Table III, Fig. 3A). The comparisons between metabolic ratios indicated a non-significant trend for increased Gln/tCr(th) ratio in the CIS-treated group (Table III, Fig. 3B).

Table III

Metabolite concentrations and ratios in the CIS-untreated and CIS-treated groups at 1H-MRS acquisition.

Table III

Metabolite concentrations and ratios in the CIS-untreated and CIS-treated groups at 1H-MRS acquisition.

A, Median concentration (IQR), mM
MetaboliteCIS-untreated (n=23)CIS-treated (n=12)P-value
tNAA(th)4.57 (2.69-5.62)3.80 (2.40-5.06)0.558
tNAA (cs)5.87 (4.56-6.78)7.21 (6.31-8.20)0.028a
tCr(th)5.79 (4.14-8.07)5.11 (3.61-5.77)0.642
tCr(cs)4.78 (4.48-5.11)5.51 (5.01-5.72)0.073
tCho (th)1.61 (1.23-1.93)1.34 (0.94-1.61)0.432
tCho(cs)1.90 (1.75-2.05)2.12 (1.93-2.28)0.308
mIns(th)3.83 (2.06-4.93)2.43 (0.96-4.58)0.462
mIns(cs)2.84 (2.30-3.87)3.25 (2.67-3.40)0.817
Gln(th)1.94 (0.00-2.98)3.42 (2.20-4.30)0.383
Gln(cs)1.68 (0.00-3.28)3.05 (1.91-3.91)0.109
Glu(th)4.85 (1.01-6.60) 4.03(2.57-5.12)0.501
Glu(cs)2.93 (2.59-3.87)4.22 (3.64-5.04)0.113
Glx(th)6.06 (2.84-9.09)7.49 (3.96-10.49)0.406
Glx(cs)4.44 (3.05-7.11)6.59 (5.31-8.88)0.125
Glth(th)0.82 (0.38-0.99)0.60 (0.14-0.70)0.429
Glth(cs)0.54 (0.35-0.73)0.55 (0.39-0.69)0.850
B, Median ratio (IQR)
MetaboliteCIS-untreated (n=23)CIS-treated (n=12)P-value
tNAA/tCr(th)0.78 (0.53-0.96)0.84 (0.53-1.12)0.497
tNAA/tCr(cs)1.22 (0.92-1.39)1.31 (1.23-1.45)0.292
tCho/tCr(th)0.26 (0.21-0.30)0.27 (0.22-0.32)0.390
tCho/tCr(cs)0.38 (0.35-0.42)0.38 (0.36-0.42)0.819
mIns/tCr(th)0.58 (0.45-0.72)0.48 (0.22-0.79)0.609
mIns/tCr(cs)0.57 (0.41-0.76)0.59 (0.52-0.68)0.680
Gln/tCr(th)0.34 (0.00-0.56)0.54 (0.45-1.11)0.088
Gln/tCr(cs)0.40 (0.00-0.59)0.58 (0.34-0.72)0.122
Glu/tCr(th)0.56 (0.24-1.04)0.75 (0.32-1.24)0.986
Glu/tCr(cs)0.62 (0.54-0.78)0.82 (0.62-0.92)0.352
Glx/tCr(th)0.94 (0.54-1.78)1.24 (1.08-2.29)0.191
Glx/tCr(cs)0.85 (0.62-1.37)1.36 (0.94-1.67)0.770
Glth/tCr(th)0.14 (0.06-0.23)0.10 (0.00-0.14)0.542
Glth/tCr(cs)0.10 (0.07-0.14)0.11 (0.07-0.14)0.984
Glx/tNAA(th)1.12 (0.89-2.37)1.47 (0.95-2.23)0.566
Glx/tNAA(cs)0.87 (0.65-1.28)1.04 (0.64-1.19)0.497
Glth/tNAA(th)0.18 (0.07-0.28)0.11 (0.00-0.23)0.795
Glth/tNAA(cs)0.08 (0.06-0.13)0.07 (0.06-0.11)0.994

[i] aP<0.05. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; IQR, interquartile range; (th), thalamic-voxel; (cs), centrum semiovale-voxel; tNAA, total N-acetyl aspartate; tCr, total creatine; tCho, total choline; mIns; myoinositol; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; Glx, glutamate + glutamine; Glth, glutathione.

Compared between CIS-untreated and HC group, there were significant differences (Table IV). CIS-untreated-group showed significantly decreased Glu(cs) and Glx(cs) and lower Gln(th), however this was not significant (Fig. 4A). Comparisons between metabolite ratios revealed significantly decreased tCho/tCr(th), Gln/tCr(th), Glu/tCr(cs), Glx/tCr(th), Glx/tCr(cs), Glx/tNAA(th) and Glx/tNAA(cs) in the CIS-untreated group compared with those in the HC group. Additionally, increased Glth/tCr(th) and Glth/tNAA(th) were observed in the CIS-untreated group, however this was not significant (Table IV; Fig. 4B).

Table IV

Metabolite concentrations and ratios in the CIS-untreated and HC groups.

Table IV

Metabolite concentrations and ratios in the CIS-untreated and HC groups.

A, Median concentration (IQR), mM
MetaboliteCIS-untreated (n=23)HC (n=28)P-value
tNAA(th)4.57 (2.63-5.71)5.23 (2.56-5.96)0.543
tNAA(cs)5.87 (4.55-6.87)6.07 (4.86-6.99)0.639
tCr(th)5.79 (4.02-8.51)5.49 (4.59-6.20)0.611
tCr(cs)4.77 (4.46-5.11)4.96 (4.66-5.38)0.247
tCho(th)1.61 (1.22-1.95)1.66 (1.28-1.89)0.983
tCho(cs)1.90 (1.73-2.06)1.90 (1.77-2.12)0.797
mIns(th)3.83 (1.95-4.93)2.56 (1.85-3.40)0.244
mIns(cs)2.84 (2.30-4.03)2.92 (2.55-3.60)0.949
Gln(th)1.94 (0.00-3.06)3.64 (2.15-4.72)0.068
Gln(cs)1.68 (0.00-3.40)2.74 (2.35-4.62)0.404
Glu(th)4.85 (0.97-6.76)4.69 (0.95-6.46)0.561
Glu(cs)2.93 (2.59-4.01)4.06 (3.55-5.67)0.019a
Glx(th)6.05 (2.73-9.14)8.53 (4.52-11.10)0.199
Glx(cs)4.44 (3.04-7.40)7.59 (6.04-8.76)0.014a
Glth(th)0.82 (0.35-0.99)0.46 (0-1.20)0.113
Glth(cs)0.54 (0.34-0.76)0.44 (0.28-0.66)0.941
B, Median ratio (IQR)
MetaboliteCIS-untreated (n=23)HC (n=28)P-value
tNAA/tCr(th)0.78 (0.53-0.96)0.876 (0.52-1.08)0.513
tNAA/tCr(cs)1.22 (0.92-1.39)1.26 (1.03-1.46)0.840
tCho/tCr(th)0.26 (0.21-0.30)0.29 (0.27-0.33)0.015a
tCho/tCr(cs)0.38 (0.35-0.42)0.38 (0.36-0.40)0.875
mIns/tCr(th)0.58 (0.45-0.72)0.48 (0.35-0.73)0.456
mIns/tCr(cs)0.57 (0.41-0.76)0.58 (0.51-0.68)0.760
Gln/tCr(th)0.34 (0.00-0.56)0.62 (0.45-0.90)0.004a
Gln/tCr(cs)0.40 (0.00-0.59)0.55 (0.47-0.91)0.267
Glu/tCr(th)0.56 (0.24-1.04)0.90 (0.10-1.36)0.272
Glu/tCr(cs)0.62 (0.54-0.78)0.87 (0.69-1.11)0.021a
Glx/tCr(th)0.94 (0.54-1.78)1.40 (0.89-2.01)0.041a
Glx/tCr(cs)0.85 (0.62-1.37)1.52 (1.25-1.78)0.003a
Glth/tCr(th)0.14 (0.06-0.23)0.07 (0.00-0.20)0.064
Glth/tCr(cs)0.10 (0.07-0.14)0.09 (0.06-0.13)0.626
Glx/tNAA(th)1.12 (0.89-2.37)1.95 (1.28-2.74)0.030a
Glx/tNAA(cs)0.87 (0.65-1.28)1.35 (0.93-1.59)0.015a
Glth/tNAA(th)0.18 (0.07-0.28)0.08 (0.00-0.20)0.086
Glth/tNAA(cs)0.08 (0.06-0.13)0.07 (0.04-0.12)0.552

[i] aP<0.05. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; HC, healthy control; 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; IQR, interquartile range; (th), thalamic-voxel; (cs), centrum semiovale-voxel; tNAA, total N-acetyl aspartate; tCr, total creatine; tCho, total choline; mIns; myoinositol; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; Glx, glutamate + glutamine; Glth, glutathione.

Discussion

The present 1H-MRS study quantified and investigated brain metabolites in patients with CIS and HCs. The present results showed metabolic alterations in the thalamus and CS in otherwise NA brain tissue on conventional MRI. 1H-MRS protocol was designed to evaluate brain regions that did not show lesions on classic FLAIR/T2 MRI sequences. Accordingly, the voxels were placed strictly in the thalamus and CS areas without including any lesions. Additionally, the present results showed similar dimensions of the 'th' and 'cs' between the patients with CIS and the HCs. Use of short TE 1H-MRS was optimal for Glu and Gln peak detection (41,42).

The present analysis compared the 1H-MRS results of the CIS and HC group and concluded that Glu, its metabolic precursor Gln (43) and Glx were reduced in the thalamus and the CS, indicating possibly diminished glutaminergic activity; however, only the difference of Glx(cs) reached statistical significance. The mixture of Glu/Gln is involved in both excitatory and inhibitory neuronal pathways (9) and concentrations of Glu, Gln and Glx are affected by the interaction between Glu formation/degradation and neurotransmission in neurons and astrocytes (21,44). Zhang and Shen (44) observed higher Glu levels in GM than in WM on 1H-MRS of brain cortices in healthy individuals. Furthermore, a previous 3.0 T 1H-MRS study in young adults showed Glx concentration to be increased in GM (thalamus included) compared with that in WM (CS included). This may be because Glu/Gln is located close to the synapses (45); this observation was in line with the present results demonstrating absolute Glx(th) higher than Glx(cs) in both the CIS and HC groups. 1H-MRS studies in patients with MS also reported decreased Glu, Gln and/or Glx concentrations: Nantes et al (23) reported decreased Glu concentrations in the sensorimotor and parietal regions of the left cerebral hemisphere; Chard et al (46) reported lower levels of Glx in the cortical GM of clinically early relapsing-remitting (RR)MS compared with those in HCs and Muhlert et al (24) reported lower Glu and Glx levels in GM regions in patients with RRMS compared with those in controls at 3.0 T. Notably, another 1H-MRS study involving patients with primary progressive MS (47) demonstrated decreased Glu and Gln concentrations in cortical GM compared with those in healthy individuals; these correlated with increased EDSS scores. Additionally, the 1H-MRS study performed at 7.0 T by Swanberg et al (48) involving patients with progressive MS, RRMS and healthy controls demonstrated that only patients with progressive MS had lower frontal cortical Glu levels but not reduced Gln compared to healthy individuals; moreover, a negative correlation of Glu levels with MS duration was found, suggesting that these findings may reflect neuronal cell death (48). Even though the present study applied the voxel in deep GM (thalamus) and not in the cortex, it found no significant differences in Glu(th) levels between the CIS and the HC group. Conversely, other 1H-MRS studies estimating Glu or Glx levels in WM reported increased levels of these two markers: Srinivasan et al (22) reported an elevation of Glu in acute lesions (contrast-enhancing) and NAWM areas, but no significant elevation in chronic lesions. Moreover, Tisell et al (49) used 1.5 T 1H-MRS and observed that Glx concentration was higher in the NAWM of patients with MS compared with that in healthy individuals, showing a positive correlation with the MS severity score, therefore suggesting that Glx in the NAWM may be associated with disease progression. Another 3.0 T 1H-MRS study of NAWM in patients with SPMS revealed annual declines of Glu and Gln levels within a 2-year period follow-up, implying that these metabolic changes may be considered biomarkers of MS disease progression (50). Azevedo et al (51) used multi-voxel 1H-MRS of mixed tissue of NAWM plus GM and concluded that higher Glu concentrations increased the rate of NAA decline and a higher Glu/NAA ratio in the NAWM increased the rate of the decrease in brain volume. Although Fernando et al (35) and Wattjes et al (32) reported higher mIns in the NAWM of patients with CIS than in HCs, the present study did not confirm such a difference.

In the present study, several metabolite ratios were also calculated and showed heterogeneity between the CIS and the HC groups; significantly reduced ratios of tCho/tCr(th), Glu/tCr(cs), Glx/tCr(cs), Glx/tNAA(th) and Glx/tNAA(cs) were found in the CIS group. In in vivo 1H-MRS studies, Cr is commonly considered a relatively stable marker of intact brain energy metabolism; therefore it has been frequently used as the reference molecule for the 1H-MRS metabolite ratios (17,52). Moreover, Cho is considered a marker of cell wall integrity as it is a precursor of the cellular membranes (20). Therefore, decreased tCho/tCr(th) ratio that was found in the CIS group may be mainly attributed to the lower Cho levels in the thalamus. This could reflect increased uptake of Cho from the free phase for the building of cell membranes and therefore may be associated with the onset of healing of brain tissue (53). Mathiesen et al (54) reported reduced Cho/Cr ratio within the cortical GM in patients with MS compared with that in HCs. These results in the NAGM may also indicate reduced cellularity during MS pathogenesis. In further accordance with the present results, which demonstrated reduced Glu/tCr(cs) and Glx/tCr(cs) ratios, Wattjes et al (32) indicated that the Glx/Cr ratio decreased by 13.2% in the parietal NAWM of patients with CIS compared with that in the HC group.

Furthermore, the present results demonstrated that tNAA(cs) was not affected in the CIS-cohort, which was in accordance with Fernando et al (35) and Brex et al (33); this may be indicative of a chemical environment characterized by lack of severe impairment of axonal and neuronal integrity (55). Nevertheless, other 1H-MRS studies described lower tNAA in the parietal NAWM in patients with CIS than that in HCs (32,34). The present Glx/tNAA ratio was found to be decreased in the thalamus and CS of the CIS group compared with that in the HC group; this may suggest disruption of glutamate homeostasis rather than neuronal/axonal damage (56) and could be because the compensatory capacity of the CNS for axonal disruption is not significantly compromised at the early stages of the MS pathogenic process. Glx/NAA ratio of the hypothalamus in patients with RRMS was assessed by Polacek et al (57); the increased ratio is associated with an increase in the MS severity scale score and disease severity. Low Glx/tNAA was observed in the NAWM and NAGM of the present CIS group; this could be attributed to their mild disease severity, since all the participants in the CIS group were at the early clinical stage of MS, with <6 months from the first clinical episode and a low median EDSS score of 1 (IQR, 1.0-1.5).

The present analysis compared 1H-MRS results between the CIS-untreated and the HC group, thus excluding the CIS-treated participants to examine for potential early impact of DMTs on the biochemical brain content. Differences between the CIS-untreated and HC group yielded statistically stronger differences than testing between the CIS vs. the HC group for Glx(cs), tCho/tCr(th), Glu/tCr(cs) Glx/tCr(cs), Glx/tNAA(th) and Glx/tNAA(cs). These findings were in alignment with the hypothesis of glutaminergic impairment and altered glutamate homeostasis in early MS (58,59). Glu(cs), Gln/tCr(th) and Glx/tCr(th) were significantly decreased in the CIS-untreated group compared with HCs, reflecting the aforementioned imbalance of Glu and its metabolites in the NAWM and NAGM.

CNS demyelination is associated with increased energy demand; Witte et al (60) observed enhanced mitochondrial density in axons and astrocytes in active MS lesions. An elevated number of mitochondria is also reported in the NAGM of patients with MS (61). Additionally, mitochondrial dysfunction is observed in the NAWM of MS (62). Consequently, the 1H-MRS quantification of tNAA, which is located in neurons and axons, may provide not only information on axonal integrity but also on mitochondrial function (11,63). The present comparison between the CIS-treated and the CIS-untreated groups indicated a higher tNAA(cs) in the CIS-treated group; this could reflect an early protective treatment effect on the chemical environment of brain WM tissue as increased levels of NAA contribute to the enhancement of mitochondrial energy production and membrane lipid production and thus to the survival of neurons (56).

Glth, is hypothesized to be a key antioxidant in neuroprotection by interacting with the reactive oxygen species, which are increased during MS pathogenesis (64) and are generated by activated macrophages during inflammation (63), thus leading to cellular damage and tissue injury. Glth is involved in the Glu-Gln cycle in astrocytes and neurons of the brain (65), and its synthesis depends on extracellular Glu levels, hence possibly contributing to the minimization of Glu toxicity by the conversion of Glu to Glth (66,67). Here, Glth(cs) and Glth(th) were estimated to be higher in the CIS than in the HC group and also in the CIS-untreated group than in HCs; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Differences in Glth ratios were also observed. Increased Glth/tCr and Glth/tNAA were evidenced in the thalamus and CS of the CIS-untreated group compared with those in the HC group with the thalamic voxel ratios demonstrating a trend toward significance for both ratios. Considering the decrease in concentrations of Glx that was observed in the CIS group of the present study, which may be attributed to the inhibition of Glu synthesis or to its rapid transformation to other metabolites such as Glth, the higher levels of Glth could reflect an adequate compensatory mechanism for diminishing Glu levels in the neuronal environment in the early clinical stage of MS as the CIS.

In the present study, certain results demonstrated only a trend toward statistical significance; a larger sample size could lead to significant results. Comparison of the CIS treated and untreated groups decreased the number of patients per sub-group, however, it revealed additional multiple significant associations and hence indicated strong differences. Additionally, heterogeneity with the results of previous 1H-MRS MS studies may be attributed to the following factors: different technical and methodological approaches and discrepancies within various spectroscopy acquisition protocols; differences in the applied magnetic field strength (1.5, 3.0 or 7.0 T); use of different [short (35 msec) or intermediate (144 msec)] TEs; inhomogeneity of tissue selection during voxel placement (such as inclusion of mixed areas of NAWM with GM or ventricles, or inclusion of regions with demyelinating lesions); different methods for spectral processing and quantification; heterogeneity in the definition of the diagnosis of early or progressive MS, and treatment influence on the levels of neurometabolites. Consequently, 1H-MRS acquisition and data processing protocols must be standardized to achieve reliable results and expand its clinical utility in MS and other diseases affecting the CNS. Follow-up 1H-MRS measurements in both CIS and HC groups should be performed to evaluate changes in metabolite levels in the long term.

In conclusion, the current findings suggested that 3.0 T 1H-MRS may provide novel insights into the metabolic alterations that could occur during the pathogenesis of MS and at the very early clinical phase of the disease. It could be considered a useful and advanced method to non-invasively evaluate and quantify brain metabolite concentrations. 3.0 T 1H-MRS was capable of detecting early biochemical changes in NAWM and NAGM before lesion formation became evident on conventional MRI, reflecting an imbalance caused by the immunological mechanism of MS. Moreover, an early indirect therapeutic impact of DMTs on the biochemical profile of NAWM and NAGM in the CIS group was also observed, despite the relatively small number of patients in the sub-group comparisons. The observed therapeutic effect indicated the need for early initiation of immunotherapy, aiming for rapid disease control to ameliorate tissue damage, since a biochemical shift may be mediated even in a few weeks from treatment onset, as shown in the present study. Therefore, in the future, 1H-MRS might be incorporated both into the monitoring of treatment efficacy and therapeutic decision-making process in MS.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

DT, AK, EK, GV, CP, CK and EA conceived and designed the study. DT, AK, EK, GV, JST, SAS, PT, IE, GT, CP, CK and EA acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. DT and AK confirm the authenticity of the raw data. DT, AK, EK and EA drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Eginition Hospital (approval no. 518/5.10.2015). Informed written consent to participate was obtained from all the participants.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Bakshi R, Thompson AJ, Rocca MA, Pelletier D, Dousset V, Barkhof F, Inglese M, Guttmann CR, Horsfield MA and Filippi M: MRI in multiple sclerosis: Current status and future prospects. Lancet Neurol. 7:615–625. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Lassmann H: Targets of therapy in progressive MS. Mult Scler. 23:1593–1599. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Lassmann H: Pathogenic mechanisms associated with different clinical courses of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 9(3116)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Haider L, Simeonidou C, Steinberger G, Hametner S, Grigoriadis N, Deretzi G, Kovacs GG, Kutzelnigg A, Lassmann H and Frischer JM: Multiple sclerosis deep grey matter: The relation between demyelination, neurodegeneration, inflammation and iron. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 85:1386–1395. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Minagar A, Barnett MH, Benedict RHB, Pelletier D, Pirko I, Sahraian MA, Frohman E and Zivadinov R: The thalamus and multiple sclerosis: Modern views on pathologic, imaging, and clinical aspects. Neurology. 80:210–219. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Houtchens MK, Benedict RHB, Killiany R, Sharma J, Jaisani Z, Singh B, Weinstock-Guttman B, Guttmann CR and Bakshi R: Thalamic atrophy and cognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 69:1213–1223. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Miller DH, Chard DT and Ciccarelli O: Clinically isolated syndromes. Lancet Neurol. 11:157–169. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Brownlee WJ and Miller DH: Clinically isolated syndromes and the relationship to multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 21:2065–2071. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Lin A, Ross BD, Harris K and Wong W: Efficacy of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in neurological diagnosis and neurotherapeutic decision making. NeuroRx. 2:197–214. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Swanberg KM, Landheer K, Pitt D and Juchem C: Quantifying the metabolic signature of multiple sclerosis by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Current challenges and future outlook in the translation from proton signal to diagnostic biomarker. Front Neurol. 10(1173)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Oh J, Ontaneda D, Azevedo C, Klawiter EC, Absinta M, Arnold DL, Bakshi R, Calabresi PA, Crainiceanu C, Dewey B, et al: Imaging outcome measures of neuroprotection and repair in MS: A consensus statement from NAIMS. Neurology. 92:519–533. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Wilson M, Andronesi O, Barker PB, Bartha R, Bizzi A, Bolan PJ, Brindle KM, Choi IY, Cudalbu C, Dydak U, et al: Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations. Magn Reson Med. 82:527–550. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Bitsch A, Bruhn H, Vougioukas V, Stringaris A, Lassmann H, Frahm J and Brück W: Inflammatory CNS demyelination: Histopathologic correlation with in vivo quantitative proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 20:1619–1627. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Rae CD: A guide to the metabolic pathways and function of metabolites observed in human brain 1H magnetic resonance spectra. Neurochem Res. 39:1–36. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Geurts JJG, Reuling IEW, Vrenken H, Uitdehaag BMJ, Polman CH, Castelijns JA, Barkhof F and Pouwels PJW: MR spectroscopic evidence for thalamic and hippocampal, but not cortical, damage in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med. 55:478–483. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Zhu H and Barker PB: MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging of the brain. Methods Mol Biol. 711:203–226. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Buonocore MH and Maddock RJ: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain: A review of physical principles and technical methods. Rev Neurosci. 26:609–632. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Nordengen K, Heuser C, Rinholm JE, Matalon R and Gundersen V: Localisation of N-acetylaspartate in oligodendrocytes/myelin. Brain Struct Funct. 220:899–917. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Narayana PA: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the monitoring of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging. 15 (Suppl 4):46S–57S. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Scheau C, Preda EM, Popa GA, Ghergus AE, Capsa RA and Lupescu IG: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy-a non-invasive method in evaluating focal and diffuse central nervous system disease. J Med Life. 5:423–427. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Hertz L: Intercellular metabolic compartmentation in the brain: Past, present and future. Neurochem Int. 45:285–296. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Srinivasan R, Sailasuta N, Hurd R, Nelson S and Pelletier D: Evidence of elevated glutamate in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. Brain. 128:1016–1025. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Nantes JC, Proulx S, Zhong J, Holmes SA, Narayanan S, Brown RA, Hoge RD and Koski L: GABA and glutamate levels correlate with MTR and clinical disability: Insights from multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 157:705–715. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Muhlert N, Atzori M, De Vita E, Thomas DL, Samson RS, Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Geurts JJ, Miller DH, Thompson AJ and Ciccarelli O: Memory in multiple sclerosis is linked to glutamate concentration in grey matter regions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 85:834–840. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Mader I, Roser W, Kappos L, Hagberg G, Seelig J, Radue EW and Steinbrich W: Serial proton MR spectroscopy of contrast-enhancing multiple sclerosis plaques: Absolute metabolic values over 2 years during a clinical pharmacological study. Am J Neuroradiol. 21:1220–1227. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Vafaeyan H, Ebrahimzadeh SA, Rahimian N, Alavijeh SK, Madadi A, Faeghi F, Harirchian MH and Rad HS: Quantification of diagnostic biomarkers to detect multiple sclerosis lesions employing (1)H-MRSI at 3T. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 38:611–618. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Cooper AJL: Role of astrocytes in maintaining cerebral glutathione homeostasis and in protecting the brain against xenobiotics and oxidative stress. In: Glutathione in the Nervous System. CRC Press, pp91-115, 2020.

28 

Rice ME and Russo-Menna I: Differential compartmentalization of brain ascorbate and glutathione between neurons and glia. Neuroscience. 82:1213–1223. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Choi I, Lee P, Hughes AJ, Denney DR and Lynch SG: Longitudinal changes of cerebral glutathione (GSH) levels associated with the clinical course of disease progression in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 23:956–562. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Choi IY, Lee SP, Denney D and Lynch S: Lower levels of glutathione in the brains of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients measured by 1H magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging at 3 T. Mult Scler. 17:289–296. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Filippi M, Bozzali M, Rovaris M, Gonen O, Kesavadas C, Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Grossman RI, Scotti G, Comi G and Falini A: Evidence for widespread axonal damage at the earliest clinical stage of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 126:433–437. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Wattjes MP, Harzheim M, Lutterbey GG, Klotz L, Schild HH and Träber F: Axonal damage but no increased glial cell activity in the normal-appearing white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis using high-field magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol. 28:1517–1522. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Brex PA, Gomez-Anson B, Parker GJ, Molyneux PD, Miszkiel KA, Barker GJ, MacManus DG, Davie CA, Plant GT and Miller DH: Proton MR spectroscopy in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 166:16–22. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Wattjes MP, Harzheim M, Lutterbey GG, Bogdanow M, Schild HH and Träber F: High field MR imaging and 1H-MR spectroscopy in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: Correlation between metabolic alterations and diagnostic MR imaging criteria. J Neurol. 255:56–63. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Fernando KTM, McLean MA, Chard DT, MacManus DG, Dalton CM, Miszkiel KA, Gordon RM, Plant GT, Thompson AJ and Miller DH: Elevated white matter myo-inositol in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 127:1361–1369. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Miller DH, Weinshenker BG, Filippi M, Banwell BL, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, Galetta SL, Hutchinson M, Johnson RT, Kappos L, et al: Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: A consensus approach. Mult Scler. 14:1157–1174. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, et al: Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 69:292–302. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Kurtzke JF: Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 33:1444–1452. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Wilson M, Reynolds G, Kauppinen RA, Arvanitis TN and Peet AC: A constrained least-squares approach to the automated quantitation of in vivo ¹H magnetic resonance spectroscopy data. Magn Reson Med. 65:1–12. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Reynolds G, Wilson M, Peet A and Arvanitis TN: An algorithm for the automated quantitation of metabolites in in vitro NMR signals. Magn Reson Med. 56:1211–1219. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Ramadan S, Lin A and Stanwell P: Glutamate and glutamine: A review of in vivo MRS in the human brain. NMR Biomed. 26:1630–1646. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Hancu I: Optimized glutamate detection at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 30:1155–1162. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Walls AB, Waagepetersen HS, Bak LK, Schousboe A and Sonnewald U: The glutamine-glutamate/GABA cycle: Function, regional differences in glutamate and GABA production and effects of interference with GABA metabolism. Neurochem Res. 40:402–409. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Zhang Y and Shen J: Regional and tissue-specific differences in brain glutamate concentration measured by in vivo single voxel MRS. J Neurosci Methods. 239:94–99. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Baker EH, Basso G, Barker PB, Smith MA, Bonekamp D and Horská A: Regional apparent metabolite concentrations in young adult brain measured by (1)H MR spectroscopy at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 27:489–499. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Chard DT, Griffin CM, McLean MA, Kapeller P, Kapoor R, Thompson AJ and Miller DH: Brain metabolite changes in cortical grey and normal-appearing white matter in clinically early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Brain. 125:2342–2352. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Sastre-Garriga J, Ingle GT, Chard DT, Ramió-Torrentà L, McLean MA, Miller DH and Thompson AJ: Metabolite changes in normal-appearing gray and white matter are linked with disability in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 62:569–573. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Swanberg KM, Prinsen H, DeStefano K, Bailey M, Kurada AV, Pitt D, Fulbright RK and Juchem C: In vivo evidence of differential frontal cortex metabolic abnormalities in progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. NMR Biomed. 34(e4590)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Tisell A, Leinhard OD, Warntjes JBM, Aalto A, Smedby Ö, Landtblom AM and Lundberg P: Increased concentrations of glutamate and glutamine in normal-appearing white matter of patients with multiple sclerosis and normal MR imaging brain scans. PLoS One. 8(e61817)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Macmillan EL, Tam R, Zhao Y, Vavasour IM, Li DKB, Oger J, Freedman MS, Kolind SH and Traboulsee AL: Progressive multiple sclerosis exhibits decreasing glutamate and glutamine over two years. Mult Scler. 22:112–116. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Azevedo CJ, Kornak J, Chu P, Sampat M, Okuda DT, Cree BA, Nelson SJ, Hauser SL and Pelletier D: In vivo evidence of glutamate toxicity in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 76:269–278. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Cecil KM: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Technique for the Neuroradiologist. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 23:381–392. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Gustafsson MC, Dahlqvist O, Jaworski J, Lundberg P and Landtblom AME: Low choline concentrations in normal-appearing white matter of patients with multiple sclerosis and normal MR imaging brain scans. Am J Neuroradiol. 28:1306–1312. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Mathiesen HK, Tscherning T, Sorensen PS, Larsson HBW, Rostrup E, Paulson OB and Hanson LG: Multi-slice echo-planar spectroscopic MR imaging provides both global and local metabolite measures in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med. 53:750–759. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Su K, Bourdette D and Forte M: Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Front Physiol. 4(169)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Moffett JR, Ross B, Arun P, Madhavarao CN and Namboodiri AMA: N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: From neurodiagnostics to neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol. 81:89–131. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Polacek H, Kantorova E, Hnilicova P, Grendar M, Zelenak K and Kurca E: Increased glutamate and deep brain atrophy can predict the severity of multiple sclerosis. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 163:45–53. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Werner P, Pitt D and Raine CS: Multiple sclerosis: Altered glutamate homeostasis in lesions correlates with oligodendrocyte and axonal damage. Ann Neurol. 50:169–180. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Kostic M, Zivkovic N and Stojanovic I: Multiple sclerosis and glutamate excitotoxicity. Rev Neurosci. 24:71–88. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Witte ME, Bø L, Rodenburg RJ, Belien JA, Musters R, Hazes T, Wintjes LT, Smeitink JA, Geurts JJ, De Vries HE, et al: Enhanced number and activity of mitochondria in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Pathol. 219:193–204. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Blokhin A, Vyshkina T, Komoly S and Kalman B: Variations in mitochondrial DNA copy numbers in MS brains. J Mol Neurosci. 35:283–287. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Dutta R, McDonough J, Yin X, Peterson J, Chang A, Torres T, Gudz T, Macklin WB, Lewis DA, Fox RJ, et al: Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 59:478–489. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Paling D, Golay X, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Kapoor R and Miller D: Energy failure in multiple sclerosis and its investigation using MR techniques. J Neurol. 258:2113–2127. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Van Horssen J, Witte ME, Schreibelt G and de Vries HE: Radical changes in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1812:141–150. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

McKenna MC: The glutamate-glutamine cycle is not stoichiometric: Fates of glutamate in brain. J Neurosci Res. 85:3347–3358. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Koga M, Serritella AV, Messmer MM, Hayashi-Takagi A, Hester LD, Snyder SH, Sawa A and Sedlak TW: Glutathione is a physiologic reservoir of neuronal glutamate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 409:596–602. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Sedlak TW, Paul BD, Parker GM, Hester LD, Snowman AM, Taniguchi Y, Kamiya A, Snyder SH and Sawa A: The glutathione cycle shapes synaptic glutamate activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116:2701–2706. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2023
Volume 26 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tzanetakos D, Kyrozis A, Karavasilis E, Velonakis G, Tzartos JS, Toulas P, Sotirli S, Evdokimidis I, Tsivgoulis G, Potagas C, Potagas C, et al: Early metabolic alterations in the normal‑appearing grey and white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A proton MR spectroscopic study. Exp Ther Med 26: 349, 2023
APA
Tzanetakos, D., Kyrozis, A., Karavasilis, E., Velonakis, G., Tzartos, J.S., Toulas, P. ... Andreadou, E. (2023). Early metabolic alterations in the normal‑appearing grey and white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A proton MR spectroscopic study. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 26, 349. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12048
MLA
Tzanetakos, D., Kyrozis, A., Karavasilis, E., Velonakis, G., Tzartos, J. S., Toulas, P., Sotirli, S., Evdokimidis, I., Tsivgoulis, G., Potagas, C., Kilidireas, C., Andreadou, E."Early metabolic alterations in the normal‑appearing grey and white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A proton MR spectroscopic study". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 26.1 (2023): 349.
Chicago
Tzanetakos, D., Kyrozis, A., Karavasilis, E., Velonakis, G., Tzartos, J. S., Toulas, P., Sotirli, S., Evdokimidis, I., Tsivgoulis, G., Potagas, C., Kilidireas, C., Andreadou, E."Early metabolic alterations in the normal‑appearing grey and white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A proton MR spectroscopic study". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 26, no. 1 (2023): 349. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12048