A case of refractory multiple myeloma with proliferation of large granular lymphocytes by lenalidomide treatment and its association with clinical efficacy

  • Authors:
    • Michitoshi Hashiguchi
    • Takashi Okamura
    • Kei Nomura
    • Takayuki Nakamura
    • Kuniki Kawaguchi
    • Satoko Koteda
    • Satoshi Morishige
    • Eijirou Oku
    • Yuka Takata
    • Ritsuko Seki
    • Fumihiko Mouri
    • Koichi Osaki
    • Kohji Yoshimoto
    • Yutaka Imamura
    • Koji Nagafuji
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 27, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.747
  • Pages: 574-578
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

A 72-year-old Japanese male was diagnosed as having monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and was followed up without therapy. Three years later, the patient progressed to symptomatic multiple myeloma. Melphalan + prednisolone was administered as first‑line chemotherapy for ~6 years. Since the patient was judged to exhibit refractory multiple myeloma, he subsequently received radiation therapy on the lumbar spine. The patient was enrolled in a clinical trial and received lenalidomide + lowdose dexamethasone (Rd) therapy. The patient achieved very good partial remission following four cycles of Rd. At this time, large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) increased to 25‑40% of peripheral blood leukocytes, however, the LGLs were present in the blood (~8%) prior to lenalidomide treatment. By flow cytometry of surface antigens, it was revealed that the LGLs were positive for cluster of differnetiation (CD)2, 7, 8, 16, 56, and 57, and human leukocyte antigen‑D related, however, were negative for CD3, 4 and 5, suggesting that these LGLs predominantly exhibited an natural killer (NK) cell phenotype. T‑cell receptor β gene rearrangement was not detected by polymerase chain reaction. A 51Cr release assay was performed to investigate whether the NK cells actually possessed activity. A low level of M protein was sustained for ~15 months. This implied the enhancement of immune activation during lenalidomide treatment. The present case study suggested that LGL cells induced by lenalidomide may contribute to long‑term restraint of myeloma cells. This immune system component may contribute to disease control.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2016
Volume 4 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hashiguchi M, Okamura T, Nomura K, Nakamura T, Kawaguchi K, Koteda S, Morishige S, Oku E, Takata Y, Seki R, Seki R, et al: A case of refractory multiple myeloma with proliferation of large granular lymphocytes by lenalidomide treatment and its association with clinical efficacy. Mol Clin Oncol 4: 574-578, 2016
APA
Hashiguchi, M., Okamura, T., Nomura, K., Nakamura, T., Kawaguchi, K., Koteda, S. ... Nagafuji, K. (2016). A case of refractory multiple myeloma with proliferation of large granular lymphocytes by lenalidomide treatment and its association with clinical efficacy. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 4, 574-578. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.747
MLA
Hashiguchi, M., Okamura, T., Nomura, K., Nakamura, T., Kawaguchi, K., Koteda, S., Morishige, S., Oku, E., Takata, Y., Seki, R., Mouri, F., Osaki, K., Yoshimoto, K., Imamura, Y., Nagafuji, K."A case of refractory multiple myeloma with proliferation of large granular lymphocytes by lenalidomide treatment and its association with clinical efficacy". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 4.4 (2016): 574-578.
Chicago
Hashiguchi, M., Okamura, T., Nomura, K., Nakamura, T., Kawaguchi, K., Koteda, S., Morishige, S., Oku, E., Takata, Y., Seki, R., Mouri, F., Osaki, K., Yoshimoto, K., Imamura, Y., Nagafuji, K."A case of refractory multiple myeloma with proliferation of large granular lymphocytes by lenalidomide treatment and its association with clinical efficacy". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 4, no. 4 (2016): 574-578. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.747