Wilms' tumor in a 51‑year‑old patient: An extremely rare case and review of the literature

  • Authors:
    • Jia Hu
    • Lu Jin
    • Tao He
    • Yifan Li
    • Yang Zhao
    • Yu Ding
    • Xianxin Li
    • Yunchu Liu
    • Yaoting Gui
    • Xiangming Mao
    • Yongqing Lai
    • Liangchao Ni
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 30, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.839
  • Pages: 1013-1016
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Wilms' tumor or nephroblastoma is a common kidney malignant tumor in childhood, accounting for ~5% of all pediatric tumors. At present, reports on Wilms' tumor occurring in adults, particularly at ages >30 years, are extremely rare. The majority of the cases of adult Wilms' tumor are closely associated with chemotherapy. Furthermore, in rare cases, Wilms' tumor is characterized by three classic types of cells, namely blastemal, stromal and epithelial cells. we herein report a case of Wilms' tumor with three classic types of cells on histological examination in a 51 year‑old male patient who had received prior chemotherapy. The patient promptly underwent radical nephrectomy and remains alive. A review of previously presented cases of adult Wilms' tumor from pubmed database was also performed.

Introduction

Wilms' tumor or nephroblastoma, named by the German surgeon Carl Max Wilhelm Wilms' in the 19th century, is the second most common intra-abdominal tumor in young children, with a peak incidence between 2 and 5 years. The incidence of Wilms' tumor in adults is extremely low, and the total cases presented to date account for <1% (1). However, the precise number of cases of Wilms' tumor in adults remains unknown, as a significant number of cases are either insufficiently documented or misdiagnosed. The stage-for-stage prognosis in adults is poorer compared with that in children. Due to the improved practicable treatments, the survival of adult patients has improved significantly from <30 to >90% (2). To the best of our knowledge, 9 cases of adult Wilms' tumor were previously published (Table I) and our patient, aged 51 years, is the second oldest patient reported to date. A radical nephrectomy was performed with subsequent chemotherapy. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Shenzhen, China) and written informed consent was obtained from the patient regarding the publication of his clinicopathological data.

Table I.

Reported cases of adult Wilms tumor.

Table I.

Reported cases of adult Wilms tumor.

CaseFirst author/Refs.YearAge (years), genderMain complaintSize (cm)LocalizationMicroscopic characteristicsImmunohistochemical staining
1Huang/(3)201520, femaleLeft flank pain and back pain6.4×6.2Left kidney, lower poleTriphasic pattern of blastemal, epithelial and stromal componentsVimentin+, CD99+, CD117+, WT1+
2Varma/(4)200648, maleFlank pain and hematuria11×10Right kidney, upper poleHighly cellular, comprising epithelial, blastemal and stromal elementsNo description
3Thevendran/(5)201037, femaleLeft flank mass9.5×14.2Right kidney, upper poleTriphasic tumor composed of epithelial, blastematous and stromal elementsWT1+
4Morabito/(6)201438, maleAbominal pain and macroscopic hematuria10Right kidneyTriphasic cellular pattern with undifferentiated blastemal cells and cells differentiating toward epithelial and stromal lineagesVimentin+, desmin+, WT1+
5Patnayak/(7)201219, maleLow backache and colicky left loin pain15×10Right kidneyMonomorphous tumor cells presenting as nests, islands and sheets, with intervening necrosis and lymphoid collectionsS-100+, CD117+, NSE+
6Guo/(8)201154, maleLow backache and colicky left loin pain2.5×2.3Right kidneyTriphasic pattern of blastemal, epithelial, and stromal componentsWT1+
7Masuda/(9)200422, maleRight flank pain4.2×1.8Right kidney, upper polePredominantly epithelial histologyNo description
8Seifert/(10)201226, femaleFever12Left kidney,Primarily undifferentiated blastemal cellsPAN-CK+, vimentin+,
9Present case201551, maleIdentified on checkup examination4.0×4.5Left kidney, upper poleUndifferentiated blastemal cells differentiating to various degrees and epithelial and stromal lineages in different proportionsWT1+

[i] WT1, Wilms' tumor 1 antibody; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; PAN-CK, pancytokeratin.

Case report

A 51 year-old man was diagnosed with a left kidney tumor on routine examination and was admitted to the Department of Urology of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Shenzhen, China) for further evaluation. The patient had no urinary or respiratory symptoms and had not undergone previous surgery. The general examination revealed no significant findings. The patient had a heart rate of 88 beats/min, a blood pressure of 118/67 mmHg, a temperature of 36.8°C and a respiratory rate of 22 breaths/min.

Laboratory examination revealed a haemoglobin level of 11.3 g/dl, and a white blood cell count of 6.86×109/l, with 59.8% granulocytes. The glucose level was 4.98 mmol/l, the blood urea nitrogen was 7.95 mmol/l and the serum creatinine was 79.2 µmol/l. The liver function tests and serum electrolyte levels were normal. Urine examination revealed several erythrocytes per high-power field. The chest X-ray, renal function tests, cardiovascular and neurological investigations were largely normal. The non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan of the kidneys revealed a 4.0×4.0×4.5-cm round hypodense mass [39 Hounsfield units (HU)] arising from the upper pole of the left kidney (Fig. 1A). The contrast-enhanced CT revealed a heterogeneously enhanced lesion (51 HU) (Fig. 1B).

The patient underwent left radical nephrectomy and macroscopically the tumor was a well-encapsulated mass that did not appear to invade neighboring tissue. The microscopic examination identified blastemal cells, undifferentiated or differentiated to various degrees, and epithelial and stromal lineages in different proportions (Fig. 2A). However, the most typical characteristic was the presence of undifferentiated blastemal cells. On immunohistochemical staining, Wilms' tumor 1 antibody (WT1) was found to be positive (Fig. 2B) and the renal neoplasm was confirmed as Wilms' tumor. Positron emission tomography-CT revealed no metastases. Chemotherapy was performed regularly and there was no evidence of cancer on medical examination at the 2-year follow-up (11).

Discussion

Nephroblastoma, also referred to as Wilms' tumor, is a embryonal neoplasm originating from nephrogenic blastemal cells, which replicates the histology of the kidneys and usually exhibits various patterns of differentiation (12). Approximately one in every 7,000 children suffer from this disease (12). There are no gender differences and Wilms' tumor occurs in equal frequency in both kidneys. The mean age is 35 and 45 months for males and females, respectively, and 98% of the cases occur at ages <10 years (12). Wilms' tumor has also been reported in adults, but it is extremely rare (13). The most common main complaints are local pain and painless hematuria, but in children a palpable mass is more common (14). The tumor is often detected by abdominal palpation, CT and ultrasound scan (15). Compared with pediatric counterparts, adult patients with advanced clinical stage exhibit metastatic manifestations more frequently (10 vs. 29%, respectively) (12). The prognosis of adult Wilms' tumor is worse compared with that in the pediatric population, and there is no detailed explanation for that phenomenon to date. Approximately 5% of Wilms' tumors are associated with an unfavorable outcome and are recognized pathologically as having unfavourable histology, mainly due to the presence of nuclear anaplasia (12).

In pediatric patients as well as in adults, Wilms' tumors present as triphasic embryonic kidney tumors, and their histological appearance has the characteristics of marked structural diversity (5). Although, classic Wilms' tumor consists of three types of cells (blastemal, stromal and epithelial), the presence of all three types is uncommon in the same case (16). The presence of blastemal cells is the predominant histological component of Wilms' tumors, and it appears in distinctive patterns. Blastemal cells exhibit scant cytoplasm and are very small, mitotically active, with rotund and overlapping nuclei containing coarsely distributed chromatin and evenly small nucleoli (17). An epithelial component is present in several Wilms' tumors, and this feature may be represented by primitive structures merely recognizable as tubular formations. Other Wilms' tumors are composed of papillary and tubular elements that are easily recognized, recapitulating normal stages of nephrogenesis (18). Various stromal patterns may occur and cause diagnostic difficulties when there is lack of blastemal and epithelial differentitation. The common undifferentiated RCC has been divided into clear-cell and non-clear-cell categories, with papillary RCC forming the most common subtype of non-clear-cell RCC (19,20). To the best of our knowledge, various undifferentiated tumors in adults should be considered in the differential diagnosis, particularly when the carcinoma is predominantly monophasic.

From a genetics aspect, ~10% of Wilms' tumors develop in association with one of several well-characterized dysmorphic syndromes. The molecular events of adult Wilms' tumorigenesis have not been fully elucidated (21). However, similar to other tumor genes, the location of Wilms' tumor may be detected by cytogenetic analysis of DNA from the patients whose abnormalities were genetically determined, enabling the prediction of a number of chromosomal disruptions significantly associated with phenotypic abnormalities. The constitutional loss of band 13 of the short arm of chromosome 11 (11p13 or WT1) was significantly associated with adult Wilms' tumors (22). The deletion of genetic material from chromosome 11p13 was clearly associated with tumorigenesis, indicating that some critical deletions may involve the tumor suppressor genes. The candidate genes were entirely selected from the deleted regions of chromosome 11p13 and the target gene WT1 or 11p13 was isolated and cloned (23). The sequence analysis demonstrated that 11p13 acts as a transcriptional regulator whose protein product significantly affects specific DNA motifs (23). However, the accurate function of the WT1 protein remains unknown. Recent research suggests that patterns of WT1 expression may play an extremely significant role in cell differentiation of the metanephric stem, which may explain the finding of associated genitourinary abnormalities. The gene for Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome has been localized to the chromosome 11p15 and named WT2, but the precise genetic mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated (24). Efforts to identify the precise genetic event at this locus have identified the presence of clusters of imprinted genes. At the locus, a preferential deletion of its maternal allele in several cases of Wilms' tumor reveals that genomic imprinting is associated with the pathogenesis of certain neoplasms (24). Furthermore, additional genetic loci are involved in familial Wilms' tumor in patients carrying WT1 and WT2. A proportion of patients with nephroblastoma usually have a positive family history of identical tumors. It remains unclear whether the aberration of genes results in Wilms' tumor or other tumors. Therefore, this issue requires further investigation.

There are currently no adequate treatment guidelines for adult Wilms' tumor (25). The pediatric regimen, which includes radical nephrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, is recommended for the treatment of the adult counterpart. However, there is limited information available for adult Wilms' tumor treatment if the initial chemotherapy fails or if the tumor recurs (25).

In the present case, our patient is the second oldest reported to date and he had received no prior chemotherapy. Furthermore, all three types of cells were histopathologically identified in the tumor. Therefore, we consider this to be an extremely rare case of adult Wilms' tumor.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81101922), the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation of China (no. S2012010008365), the Science and Technology Development Fund Project of Shenzhen (nos. JCYJ20130402114702124 and JCYJ20150403091443329) and the fund of Guangdong Key Medical Subject.

References

1 

Özyörük D, Demir HA, Emir S, Karakuş E and Tunç B: Occurrence of Wilms' tumor in a child with hereditary spherocytosis. Turk J Pediatr. 57:206–209. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sakai K, Shimodaira S, Maejima S, et al: Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy targeting Wilms' tumor 1 in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurosurg. 123:989–97. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Huang JL, Liao Y, An Y and Qiu MX: Spontaneous rupture of adult Wilms' tumor: A case report and review of the literature. Can Urol Assoc J. 9:E531–E534. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Varma AV, Malukani K, Rihal P and Nandedkar SS: Adult Wilms' tumor: A case report with review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 11:934–936. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Thevendran G, Farne HA and Kaisary AV: Wilms' tumor in a 37-yeal-old. J Clin Med Res. 2:194–197. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Morabito V, Guglielmo N, Melandro F, Mazzesi G, Alesini F, Bosco S and Berloco PB: Adult Wilms tumor: Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 6:273–276. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Patnayak R, Rambabu DV, Jena A, Vijaylaxmi B, et al: Rare case of blastemal predominant adult Wilms' tumor with skeletal metastasis case report and brief review of literature. Indian J Urol. 28:447–449. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

The reference of case 6: Guo A, Wei L, Song X and Liu A: Adult wilms tumor with intracaval and intracardiac extension: report of a case and review of literature. J Cancer. 2:132–135. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Masuda H, Azuma H, Nakajima F, Watsuji T and Katsuoka Y: Adult Wilms' tumor with calcification untreated for 5 years-a case report. BMC Urol. 4:52004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Seifert RP, McNab P, Sexton WJ, Sawczyn KK, Smith P, Coppola D and Bui MM: Rhabdomyomatous differentiation in Wilms tumor pulmonary metastases: a case report and literature review. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 42:409–416. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Huszno J, Starzyczny-Słota D, Jaworska M and Nowara E: Adult Wilms tumor-diagnosis and current therapy. Cent European J Urol. 66:39–44. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

PDQ Pediatric Treatment Editorial Board: Wilms' tumor and other childhood kidney tumors treatment (PDQ®). Bethesda MD: 2002.

13 

Ali EM and Elnashar AT: Adult Wilms' tumor: Review of literature. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 18:148–151. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Yadav SC, Sathe PA, Ghodke RK and Fernandes GC: Giant untreated Wilms' tumor with intracardiac extension: A rare case. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 56:68–69. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Wu J, Zhu Q, Zhu W and Chen W: CT and MRI imaging features and long-term follow-up of adult Wilms tumor. Acta Radiol. Oct 8–2015.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Shukrun R, Pode-Shakked N, Pleniceanu O, Omer D, Vax E, Peer E, Pri-Chen S, Jacob J, Hu Q, Harari-Steinberg O, et al: Wilms tumor blastemal stem cells dedifferentiate to propagate the tumor bulk. Stem Cell Reports. 3:24–33. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Patnaik N, Mishra K, Saini P and Agarwal N: Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney in a young male: Case report and review of literature. Urol Ann. 7:236–239. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Hussong JW, Perkins SL, Huff V, McDonald JM, Pysher TJ, Beckwith JB and Coffin CM: Familial Wilms tumor with neural elements: Characterization by histology, immunohistochemistry and genetic analysis. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 3:561–567. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Sircar K, Rao P, Jonasch E, Monzon FA and Tamboli P: Contemporary approach to diagnosis and classification of renal cell carcinoma with mixed histologic features. Chin J Cancer. 32:303–311. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Ehrlich PF, Anderson JR, Ritchey ML, et al: Clinicopathologic findings predictive of relapse in children with stage III favorable-histology Wilms tumor. J Clin Oncol. 31:1196–1201. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kohler B, Biebermann H, Friedsam V, Gellermann J, Maier RF, Pohl M, Wieacker P, Hiort O, Grüters A and Krude H: Analysis of the Wilms tumor suppressor gene (WT1) in patients 46,XY disorders of sex development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96:E1131–E1136. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Akpa MM, Iglesias DM, Chu LL, Cybulsky M, Bravi C and Goodyer PR: Wilms' tumor suppressor, WT1, suppresses epigenetic silencing of the β-catenin gene. J Biol Chem. 290:2279–2288. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Wagner KD, Cherfils-Vicini J, Hosen N, Hohenstein P, Gilson E, Hastie ND, Michiels JF and Wagner N: The Wilms tumour suppressor Wt1 is a major regulator of tumour angiogenesis and progression. Nat Commun. 5:58522014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Park M, Choi Y, Choi H and Roh J: Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (WT1) suppresses apoptosis by transcriptionally downregulating BAX expression in immature rat granulosa cells. J Ovarian Res. 7:1182014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Provenzi M, Saettini F, Conter V, Chinaglia D, Vai P, Bruno A, Cavalleri L, Foglia C, Giraldi E, Collini P and Spreafico F: Is there a role for FDG-PET for the assessment of treatment efficacy in Wilms tumor? A case report and literature review. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 30:633–639. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2016
Volume 4 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hu J, Jin L, He T, Li Y, Zhao Y, Ding Y, Li X, Liu Y, Gui Y, Mao X, Mao X, et al: Wilms' tumor in a 51‑year‑old patient: An extremely rare case and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 4: 1013-1016, 2016
APA
Hu, J., Jin, L., He, T., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Ding, Y. ... Ni, L. (2016). Wilms' tumor in a 51‑year‑old patient: An extremely rare case and review of the literature. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 4, 1013-1016. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.839
MLA
Hu, J., Jin, L., He, T., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Li, X., Liu, Y., Gui, Y., Mao, X., Lai, Y., Ni, L."Wilms' tumor in a 51‑year‑old patient: An extremely rare case and review of the literature". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 4.6 (2016): 1013-1016.
Chicago
Hu, J., Jin, L., He, T., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Li, X., Liu, Y., Gui, Y., Mao, X., Lai, Y., Ni, L."Wilms' tumor in a 51‑year‑old patient: An extremely rare case and review of the literature". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 4, no. 6 (2016): 1013-1016. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.839