This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disorder defined as a subgroup of myeloid malignancies consistent with disseminated infiltration and clonal proliferation of Langerhans cells, a specific type of immature CD1a-positive cells. These cells are named after Paul Langerhans, a 19th century young doctor who first identified them as epidermal cells of extracutaneous nerves using gold colloid staining technique. Actually, we now know that epidermal Langerhans cells are dendritic cells, a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic cells enriched in interface tissues throughout the body, mainly the skin, lungs, liver, bone marrow and lymphoid organs. These cells help regulate the immune system, presenting antigens to and activating antigen-specific T cells (1). LCH can appear at any age, but it is found usually during childhood, mainly between ages 2 and 3, with an annual incidence of 4.6 cases per 1 million children under 15 years of age. The estimated incidence among adults is 1 to 2 cases per million, though LCH is probably underdiagnosed in this population. Race and ethnic background appear to influence the risk of developing LCH, with a suspected higher risk among Caucasians, particularly in Northern Europe (2). LCH can present before, after, or along with other histologic cancers, frequently with shared mutations suggesting clonality, though it is not clear whether a history of LCH confers an increased risk of cancer (3).

The natural history of LCH consists of an insidious onset and intermittent remissive pattern, clinical manifestations of LCH vary from a self-limiting single bone disease to rapidly fatal multi-systemic one. The prognosis of LCH is closely related to age of onset (usually better outcome in adult patients), internal organs involvement and degree of functional impairment (3).

Case report

A 31-year-old woman was referred to Internal Medicine consultation because of a 2-month history of polydipsia (daily water intake around 8 liters per day) and polyuria, lately associated with exertional dyspnoea and episodic non-productive cough. She denied weight loss, anorexia and recent use of medication. She did not present emotional lability or other psychological distress. The patient was an active smoker, with familial history of multiple myeloma and Hodgkin disease. During physical examination, she had some fine crackles at pulmonary auscultation, with no other significant findings. Respiratory failure was excluded. During ambulatory investigation, the thoracic x-ray detected a diffuse a reticulonodular pattern (Fig. 1A) and further pulmonary assessment with thoracic CT scan was performed which showed bilateral bronchiectasis, interstitial fibrosis and bullous emphysema (Fig. 1B). Given these findings, a bronchofibroscopy was performed, which was eventually cancelled given her intolerance to fasting and her need to maintain water intake. Instead, it was decided for hospitalization in order to perform a surgical biopsy of the middle lobe and also to conclude the diagnostic workup related to her polydipsic and polyuric state. During hospitalization, the patient presented normal renal function (serum BUN of 54 mg/dl and serum creatinine of 0.94 mg/dl), normal levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) as well as serum eletrolytes (sodium 137 mmol/l, potassium 3.8 mmol/l and calcium 8.8 mg/dl). Her biochemical profile also included SACE levels (serum angiotensin converting enzyme) of 47 U/l (normal value <50 U/l and serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 20 mm/h (normal value <12 mm/h). She was submitted to a water deprivation test which lasted for 3 h and presented a serum sodium concentration (sNa) of 145 mmol/l with serum osmolality (SO) of 309 mOsm/kg and urine osmolality (UO) of 242 mOsm/kg). There was a significant clinical response after administration of 10 µg intra-nasal desmopressin (sNa of 138 mmol/l with SO of 272 mOsm/kg and UO of 831 mOsm/kg), compatible with central diabetes insipidus (CDI). A cranial MRI was also performed, which showed absence of posterior pituitary T1-weighted hypersignal and pituitary stalk thickening of 4 mm (normal value <3.5 mm) (Fig. 2).

Figure 1 (A) Thoracic x-ray showing diffuse reticulonodular pattern and (B) thoracic CT image showing bilateral bronchiectasis, interstitial fibrosis and bullous emphysema.

Figure 2 Brain MRI showing absence of posterior pituitary T1-weighted hypersignal and pituitary stalk thickening of 4 mm (normal value <3.5 mm).

Meanwhile, the histologic exam of lung biopsy revealed a centrilobular emphysema with intra-alveolar macrophage desquamation, lymphoplasmocytic infiltration and juxtapleural confluence of Langerhans cells-CD1a and protein S100 positivity (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 Lung histologic pattern: Langerhans cells-(A) CD1a and (B) protein S100 positivity.

It was assumed that the water balance disorder and the respiratory symptoms could be related to LCH affecting both brain and lungs. The patient was discharged maintaining treatment with desmopressin and underwent ambulatory staging PET-CT which confirmed pituitary and pulmonary uptake of 18FDG (Fig. 4). After multidisciplinary evaluation, the patient began combination therapy with prednisone and cytarabine. The patient quit smoking and showed complete resolution of polyuria and polydipsia within the first month of treatment (oral desmopressin plus cytarabine/prednisone); she also noticed significant improvements over her respiratory symptoms 6 months later.

Figure 4 Reconstructed positron emission tomography-CT images showing increased pituitary and pulmonary 18Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (yellow blur).

Discussion

The Histiocyte Society proposed a classification of different forms of histiocytosis, according to its cellular pattern, distinguishing 3 categories: (1) dendritic cells disorders (including LCH); (2) macrophage-related disorders; and (3) malignant histiocytosis (4). At present, LCH is classified as single-system (SS) and multisystem (MS) histiocytosis, the latter being divided in two groups depending on whether risk organs (RO) are involved (liver, lung, spleen and bone marrow) (5). The most important clinical LCH syndromes are eosinophilic granuloma (SS), Hand-Schüller-Christian disease (MS, RO-negative) and Letterer-Siwe disease (MS, RO-positive) (6). Some authors assume that histiocytic infiltration appears to be dominated by regulatory T-cell disfunction (which fail to neutralize the histiocytes), rather than an hyperproliferative process alone (7). There is still an active debate regarding LCH pathogenesis because it appears that this disease apparently presents features of both chronic inflammatory disease (presence of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IFN, IL-2, IL-12 and IL-17) (7) and neoplastic disease (presence of proto-oncogenic BRAF V600 and MEK-1 mutations) (8,9).

The biopsy of one of the affected organs and its immunohistochemical (IHC) findings are crucial to confirm the diagnosis of LCH. The main differences between LCH and other forms of histiocytosis are based on specific profile markers such as CD1a and CD207 positivity as well as presence of Birbeck granules (pathognomonic cytoplasmic inclusions viewed by electron microscopy up to 40% of cases). The major differential diagnosis of adult LCH is Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), a CD163 positive and CD1a negative polyostotic sclerosing form of histiocytosis, which often affects patients older than 40 years of age and could also develop CID (9).

In this article we present a rare case of LCH MS disease presenting with CDI before the beginning of the respiratory symptoms. Eventually, pulmonary assessment finally led to the diagnosis.

Despite being found in up to 30% of adult patients, it has been estimated that only 7% of pathologically-proven pulmonary LCH develop CDI and, in general, the latter is clinically evident afterwards (10,11). There are also some reports of pituitary hormone deficiency in most severe cases (12,13). The cranial MRI shows absence of physiologic high-T1 signal of neuro-hypophysis and thickening of pituitary stalk (>3,5 mm) (12,13). The diagnosis of CDI is made by water deprivation test or, if not tolerated, using hypersaline infusion (0,05 ml/kg/min for 2 h). Usually, CDI does not respond to any LCH-directed treatment and requires long-term replacement therapy with desmopressin (13). The respiratory symptoms described by the patient are usually seen in most cases of adult pulmonary LCH, mainly exertional dyspnoea, non-productive cough and pleuritic pain. High resolution thoracic CT scan typically shows interstitial, reticulonodular lesions and honeycombing pattern, which could contribute to mixed restrictive and obstructive patterns. In severe cases, pulmonary hypertension may develop (14,15).

Our patient also reported a history of active smoking, which is described as a potential risk factor of LCH. However, the role of cigarette smoke exposure in LCH pathogenesis and the impact of variable consumption in disease progression is yet to be fully understood. Smokers with LCH are also at high risk of developing recurrent pneumothorax (16). Some authors believe that smoking cessation appears to have significant prognostic impact in pulmonary LCH patients (16). Besides pulmonary and pituitary involvement, LCH is characterized by other important manifestations. Cutaneous and bone involvement are the most frequent signs of LCH, found in >50% of patients. This form of LCH could have the potential of spontaneous clinical remission, particularly in children (17). Bone damage seen in LCH is mainly related to osteolytic lesions, being the jaw most affected in adults (18). The osteolytic lesions seen in LCH are due to osteoclast-like activity of multinuclear giant cells (18,19) and different symptoms may develop depending on anatomic location. In fact, patients could develop conduction deafness (mastoid involvement), exophthalmia (retro-orbicular involvement) and paraplegia (vertebral involvement) (20,21). The PET-CT and axial MRI are most useful for further defining skeletal lesions and could also be used to evaluate treatment response (21).

There is no consensus regarding LCH management in adult patients. In general, the choice of therapeutic regimen is based on disease severity (22). Cutaneous form of LCH patients could even benefit from ultraviolet phototherapy (23,24). The Histiocyte Society and Japan LCH Study Group have been conducting several prospective, randomized control trials that studied the effect of several chemotherapy regimens for LCH (25,26). The LCH-III study was designed for establishment of a MS LCH treatment strategy, which consisted of oral prednisone daily and intravenous vimblastine weekly for 6 weeks and repeat the same treatment for another 6 weeks if disease remains active (27).

Patients in remission after 6-week of induction therapy should begin maintenance therapy with a 12-month triple regimen, composed by daily oral 6-mercaptopurine and oral prednisone associated with weekly intravenous vimblastine. Patients with multifocal bone disease and/or central nervous system lesions should be treated with oral prednisone daily and intravenous vimblastine weekly for 6 months. The addition of methotrexate in LCH treatment is not recommended in current practice (27). Despite these recommendations, our patient began combination therapy of cytarabine with oral prednisone, according to our clinical experience and treatment protocol developed in our department. This regimen has been studied in the last few years with promising results. Simko et al revised data of patients treated with cytarabine for both naïve and recurrent LCH at Texas Cancer Center from 2005-2013. They concluded that 88% of LCH achieved remission by the end of first year of treatment and 59% of patients with recurrent LCH showed significant improvement in the first three months of therapy (28).

In a retrospective study, there was a significant survival impact of cytarabine after the first year of remission, with less toxicity compared with classic regimen vinblastine/prednisone (29).

Thus, we present a case report that also reaffirms the therapeutic potential of this alternative treatment as a first contender to dethrone vinblastine/prednisone. There have been also some positive results of pulmonary LCH patients being treated with cladribine, in monotherapy or in association with systemic glucocorticoids (30). The ongoing LCH-IV study, a prospective international treatment protocol sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute will investigate the efficiency of second line treatment with cytosine arabinoside and cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) in patients who did not respond to standard first-line prednisone and vinblastine. In 2017, FDA approved vemurafenib for ECD with BRAF V600 mutations. There are some reports of LCH patients who presented this mutation that showed clinical improvement maintained after 4 months of treatment with vemurafenib, even though persistent disease activity was still observed. More clinical trials are needed to validate this treatment strategy in LCH patients presenting BRAF V600 mutations (31,32). Bone marrow transplantation or reduced-intensity condition stem cell transplantation has shown promise as effective salvage therapy in LCH patients with a very poor prognosis (rapid disease progression, refractory to conventional treatment, or with disseminated risk-organ involvement) (33,34).

In conclusion, the advances over basic knowledge on LCH poses a huge challenge in clinical practice particularly over patient care.

Given its low prevalence, there is still the need of further clinical trials regarding innovative and targeted therapies that could be used as an alternative to standard care.

There is quite expectations regarding LCH-IV results, which could consolidate LCH treatment recommendations for refractory disease.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors' contributions

JL concieved and designed the manuscript. JL,CF and DM acquired the data. CF and DM drafted the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

The patient provided written informed consent for the publication of any associated data and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References