Open Access

A population‑based study of outcomes in patients with surgically resected non‑small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase‑rearranged mutations: A matched‑pair study

  • Authors:
    • Masaharu Inagaki
    • Hideo Ichimura
    • Shingo Usui
    • Kesato Iguchi
    • Osamu Ishibashi
    • Ryota Nakamura
    • Yoshihisa Inage
    • Hisashi Suzuki
    • Moriyuki Kiyoshima
    • Koichi Kamiyama
    • Masaki Kimura
    • Susumu Yoshida
    • Mitsuaki Sakai
    • Naohiro Kobayashi
    • Kinya Furukawa
    • Hiroaki Satoh
    • Nobuyuki Hizawa
    • Yukio Sato
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 19, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2173
  • Article Number: 11
  • Copyright: © Inagaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with surgically resected non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‑rearranged mutations. A matched‑pair analysis in completely resected ALK‑rearranged NSLC patients and those with neither ALK nor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations diagnosed at 11 institutes was performed between April 2008 and March 2019. A total of 51 patients with surgically resected ALK‑rearranged NSCLC were included. Women constituted 68.6%, and smokers 29.4%. The median age was 65 years. In matched‑pair analysis, disease‑free survival and overall survival did not differ between patients with ALK‑rearranged mutations and those without mutations. Post‑recurrence survival in patients with ALK mutations was longer than that of patients with neither ALK nor epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. ALK genetic testing should be performed, even in elderly patients with NSCLC. Favorable prognosis might be expected after appropriate treatment for patients with recurrent ALK‑mutated disease.

Introduction

Lung cancer is an important public health problem and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with more than 1.38 million deaths worldwide (1,2). The prognosis of lung cancer remains dismal in which 15% of patients have a 5-year survival rate regardless of stage (3). Mutational and proteomic profiling studies have led to the identification of molecular driver mutations in lung cancer (4). EGFR mutations, as the first driver mutation gene in lung cancer, has brought about a large paradigm shift in lung cancer treatment (5). With this as a breakthrough, the research of driver genes for lung cancer was greatly accelerated. Among the driver genes that are currently being confirmed, EGFR mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement are so far the most frequent and clinically important carcinogenic driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement mutations and the introduction of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) have dramatically changed the treatment of advanced or recurrent NSCLC patients with ALK rearranged mutations (6-8). The value of ALK-TKIs has been demonstrated in randomized trials (6-8), and they are currently first-choice drugs for patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC harboring ALK-rearranged mutations. In surgically-resected lung adenocarcinoma patients with ALK rearranged mutations, however, controversy persists as to whether the ALK-rearranged mutations is an unfavorable prognostic factor (9-23). Previous reports have variously indicated ALK-rearranged mutations was a favorable prognostic factor (9,10), an unfavorable factor (11-18), or a factor not associated with prognosis (19-23). Such different results might be related to the small number of patients with ALK rearranged mutations, and the large difference in the background between patients with and without ALK rearranged mutations. That is, the frequency of ALK rearranged mutations was higher among young patients, female patients and non-smokers (6,13-15,24-26). In addition, it is still unclear whether the presence or absence of the ALK mutations is associated with post-recurrence survival (PRS). Differences in patient background might also be related to the relationship between ALK mutations and PRS. Therefore, in order to clarify these two issues, it was necessary to match the patient backgrounds and compare the survival of patients with and without ALK mutations. There are several ways to match different patient backgrounds and compare different groups, including matched-pair analyses. In the present study, we compared disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and PRS in patients with surgically resected NSCLC with ALK mutations and those without the mutations. The primary aims of the present study were to elucidate whether ALK-rearranged mutations in patients with surgically resected disease was associated with OS, and to clarify whether patients with ALK mutations had a longer PRS.

Patients and methods

Patients

This was a retrospective study in which all medical institutions covering one prefecture in our country participated. We included patients who were diagnosed as having ALK-rearranged NSCLC between April 2008 and March 2019. Patients, who had undergone surgery before the diagnostic method of ALK fusion mutations was approved by medical insurance in our country in May 2012 and were diagnosed as having ALK-rearranged NSCLC during the study period, were included in the study. Controls were 232 patients who were diagnosed as having neither ALK rearrangement mutations nor epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutations and had had surgical resections during the study period at the Mito Medical Center and Mito Kyodo General Hospital. The control matched-pair patients were those among the 232 control patients whose main clinical characteristics were consistent with ALK-rearranged mutated patients, including age, sex, performance status, pathological stage, and smoking habit, which are known prognostic factors for NSCLC patients. Histopathological diagnoses were defined according to the World Health Organization classification system, and the patients were staged according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (8th edition). The patient characteristics, efficacy, safety, DFS, OS were evaluated using patient data extracted from the database of each institution. DFS was calculated from the date of surgery to the recurrence or any cause of death and OS was the interval from the date of surgery to the date of death, or latest follow-up contact. PRS was defined as the interval between the date of recurrence and to the date of death or latest follow-up contact.

The present non-interventional and observational retrospective study conformed to the Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Studies issued by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mito Kyodo General Hospital-Mito Medical Center, University of Tsukuba (no. 16-66, 18-15) or independent ethics committees associated with each study institute. Written comprehensive informed consent for reporting clinical course was obtained from each patient at the time of admission.

Measurement of ALK fusion gene

Analysis of ALK fusion mutations was performed by the respective assay method used by each institution, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), using biopsy specimens, cytology specimens and plasma specimens.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation). Differences in proportions between two independent groups were compared using the χ2 test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare two groups of sample data. The survival rate was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons performed using the log-rank test. The effects of clinicopathological factors on survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinicopathological features in patients with ALK-rearranged mutations

During the study period, 129 patients were diagnosed as having ALK-rearranged NSCLC. The analysis of ALK fusion mutation was examined using FISH in 78 patients, IHC in 30 patients, and both tests in 21 patients. Fifty-eight patients had surgical resection. Among them, 51 patients had curative complete resection. Seven patients were excluded from this study because they did not have no curative resection. Table I shows the clinicopathological features of the 51 with ALK mutations who had curative complete resection and 232 completely resected controls who had neither ALK-rearranged mutations nor EGFR mutations. Proportions of all the features in these two groups of patients except for performance status were different.

Table I

Clinicopathological characteristics of enrolled patients: 51 surgically resected patients with ALK mutation and 232 surgically resected controls who had neither ALK rearranged mutation nor EGFR mutations.

Table I

Clinicopathological characteristics of enrolled patients: 51 surgically resected patients with ALK mutation and 232 surgically resected controls who had neither ALK rearranged mutation nor EGFR mutations.

CharacteristicsResected patients with ALK mutationResected controls with neither ALK nor EGFRP-value
Age (year), median, range65, 32-8270, 39-89<0.001
Sex  <0.001
     Male16748 
     Female3584 
Performance status  0.078
     041149 
     1978 
     215 
Smoking status  0.516
     Never36151 
     Past or current1581 
P-stage  <0.001
     IA-IB21162 
     IIA-IIB1437 
     IIIA1633 
5-year survival (%)84.069.80.059

[i] ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

In 51 patients with ALK-rearranged mutations, the median age was 65 (range, 32-82) years. Presence of ALK fusion mutation was confirmed in FISH, IHC, and both tests in 27, 19 and 5 patients, respectively. There were 16 (31.4%) males and 35 females. Fifty (98.0%) patients had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1). Fifteen (29.4%) of them were non-smokers. All 51 patients had adenocarcinoma. The median maximum diameter of the primary lesion was 20 mm (range, 12-82 mm). At the time of initial diagnosis, 21 patients (41.2%) were diagnosed as having pathological stage IA-B, 14 (27.5%) patients with IIA-B, and 16 (31.4%) patients with IIIA. The average 5-year survival rate of the 51 patients who underwent complete resections was 84.0%.

Clinicopathological features and survival in matched-pair patients

Table II shows the clinicopathological characteristics of 38 ALK-rearranged mutated patients and 38 matched-pair control patients whose main clinical characteristics were matched to patients with ALK-rearrangements. In these two matched groups of patients, 11 and 12 patients experienced recurrence during the study period. DFS and OS from the surgery in these two groups of patients are shown in Fig. 1. There was no significant difference between these two groups in either DFS (P=0.303) or OS (P=0.820).

Table II

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients matched according to clinical characteristics: 38 patients with ALK-rearranged mutation and 38 patients with neither ALK nor EGFR mutation.

Table II

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients matched according to clinical characteristics: 38 patients with ALK-rearranged mutation and 38 patients with neither ALK nor EGFR mutation.

CharacteristicsResected patients with ALK mutationResected controls with neither ALK nor EGFRP-value
Age (year), median, range65, 40-8267, 46-820.763
Sex  0.807
     Male1312 
     Female2526 
Performance status  0.361
     03033 
     185 
Smoking status  0.622
     Never1311 
     Past or current2527 
P-stage  0.841
     IA-IB2022 
     IIA-IIB99 
     IIIA97 
Recurrence during the study period  0.803
     Present1112 
     Absent2726 
5-year survival77.571.50.820

[i] ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

Post-recurrence survival

Table III shows the time to recurrence, the administration of ALK-TKI after recurrence, and PRS in the two groups of patients. As for these, there were no differences between the two groups. As shown in Fig. 2, patients with ALK-rearranged mutations had longer PRS compared with those who had neither ALK nor EGFR mutations (P=0.042).

Table III

Clinicopathological characteristics of pair-matched recurrent patients: Patients with ALK-rearranged mutation and patients with neither ALK-rearranged mutation nor EGFR mutation.

Table III

Clinicopathological characteristics of pair-matched recurrent patients: Patients with ALK-rearranged mutation and patients with neither ALK-rearranged mutation nor EGFR mutation.

CharacteristicPatients with ALKPatients with neither ALK nor EGFRP-value
Number of patients1112 
ALK-TKI therapy after recurrence   
     Present90 
     Absent210 
Period until recurrence, median (range)4 (1-62) months17 (2-94) months0.104
Survival status  0.059
     Dead38 
     Alive84 
Survival from recurrence14 (1-91) months7 (1-72) months0.487

[i] ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

Discussion

It is well known that the proportion of patients with ALK-rearranged mutations is higher among young patients, female patients, and non-smokers (6,13-15,24-26). The characteristics of younger patients were comparable to previous studies (13-15,24,25). The percentage of non-smokers was higher among patients with ALK-rearranged mutations than among patients without ALK mutations (8,12-14,16,20,21,23). The high percentage of non-smokers was also comparable among patients with ALK mutations who underwent resections (13,14,16,21). Only a study by Blackhall et al reported a high percentage of smokers (9). In the present study, the proportion of female patients and non-smokers was 68.6 and 29.4%, respectively, consistent with previous studies (10,12-14,16,20,21,23). However, the median age in our patients was 65 years, which was older than that of patients in previous studies (13-15,24,25). Our data suggested that there might be more patients with surgically resectable ALK-rearranged NSCLC over the age of 60 years and those with a smoking habit. Therefore, evaluation of ALK fusion events might need to be proactively pursued in elderly NSCLC patients. It has been controversial whether the prognosis of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC is better than that of patients without ALK-rearranged mutations (9-23).

Previous studies on the survival of ALK-mutated patients focused on one of three groups: All ALK-mutated patients; patients with advanced or recurrent disease; and patients who underwent resections (9-23). Survival results in these studies were inconsistent among the three patient groups (9-23). Particularly among studies of patients who underwent resections (9,13-17,19,21,22), some reports indicated a good prognosis in patients with ALK-rearranged mutations (9) while other reports indicated poor prognosis (13-17). Yet other reports indicated that the ALK-rearranged mutations was not associated with prognosis (19,21,22). Except for a study Blackhall et al, all were small with up to 50 patients, and control patients in these studies were those without ALK-rearranged mutations resected at the same study period (9,13-17,19,21,22). As described above, the proportion of young, female, and non-smoking patients was higher in patients with ALK-rearranged mutations than in those without (6,13-17,24-26). As a result, it might be that patients with ALK-rearranged mutations and those without ALK mutations had significantly different backgrounds that might account for the different prognosis. Therefore, we consider a simple comparison of patient groups with different background factors an inappropriate methodology. Matched-pair analysis, which matches factors known to be important prognostic factors, was considered one of the suitable statistical analyses to be applied. However, there have been only two studies analyzed using this statistical method (9,23). One was a study of only 28 patients with clinical stages III and IV (23). Although this report showed that there was no difference in the survival of patients with and without ALK mutations, this result only applied to patients with advanced disease (23). Another report was by Blackhall et al in 80 patients who underwent resections with pathological stages I through III (9). They reported that patients with ALK-rearranged mutations were associated with better OS (9). Our matched-pair analysis, which matched some clinical characteristics, however, showed that DFS and OS in patients with ALK mutations were not significantly different from those with neither ALK nor EGFR mutations. EGFR mutations are the most frequent driver gene recognized at present (6,8). However, Blackhall et al did not mention the exclusion of patients with EGFR mutations (9). In addition, their cohort had a very high percentage of patients with a smoking history, with 81.7% of ALK-mutated patients being current or past smokers (9). In our study, 70.6% of ALK-mutated patients had a smoking history. The inconsistency between the study by Blackhall et al and ours might be related to a difference in the background of the ALK-rearranged patients studied.

In the present study, we obtained another important finding. PRS of patients with ALK-rearranged mutations was significantly longer than that of patients without the mutations. Clinical trials in ALK-TKIs included patients with advanced, as well as those with recurrent disease (6-8), and retrospective clinical studies also included these patients (6-8). However, there have been no reports comparing PRS of patients with ALK mutations and that of patients without the mutations. This was the first study to compare PRS of patients with or without ALK rearranged mutations using matched-pair analysis. We matched clinical factors considered as major prognostic factors. ALK-TKI treatment seemed to be the reason why the survival of patients with ALK-rearranged mutations was longer than that of patients without the mutations. Whether the presence of the ALK fusion gene itself is associated with prognosis, or whether administration of TKI is associated with prognosis, is not a major problem in actual practice. If the patient with the ALK fusion gene mutations relapses, administering TKI is a standard treatment. Clarification of these reasons should be left to future biological studies. Our findings were derived from a small number of patients treated with ALK-TKIs, and need to be confirmed by future studies.

In this research, we chose the matched-pair analysis because we wanted to make the clinical and pathological variables as even as possible in comparison the survival with ALK rearranged mutations. We matched background characteristics that were previously associated with prognosis, such as age, gender, performance status, pathological stage, and smoking habit. Regarding OS, no difference could be confirmed between the two patients with or without ALK rearrangement mutations. This might relate to the short observation period and the small number of patients. Alternatively, it might suggest that ‘curative resections’ had overwhelmingly larger impact on contributing to overall survival than ‘ALK rearrangement mutations and presence of ALK-TKI treatment’ did.

The present study had several limitations. Firstly, it was a retrospective study with patients from miscellaneous backgrounds. Secondly, the methods for examining ALK-fusion gene mutations were not unified. For ALK examination, FISH and immunostaining were performed. Patients who confirmed the presence of the ALK fusion gene by both examinations were also included. The effects of the difference in detection sensitivity of these measurements on our results could not be fully investigated. Comprehensive screening with next generation sequencer was not used in this study population. Thirdly, the limited number of patients and the short period of investigation were also limitations. Fourthly, it was a matched-pair study with a one-to-one patient ratio, but it would be favorable to include more control patients with matched clinical characteristics. Fifthly, as for the survival, our study could not analyze the presence of the ALK mutations and the use of ALK-TKI separately. At present, administration of ALK-TKI is the standard treatment in recurrent patients with ALK mutations, so it is not realistic to consider these separately in clinical practice. Despite these limitations, we suppose that our data from ALK-rearranged patients collected by multiple institutions will provide clinically meaningful information.

In summary, DFS and OS of patients with ALK-rearranged mutations were not significantly different from those with neither ALK nor EGFR mutations. PRS of patients with ALK-rearranged mutations was significantly longer than that of patients without the mutations. ALK-TKI treatment after recurrence might play an important role. It is important to treat patients with resected ALK-rearranged NSCLC with consideration of driver gene mutations. Successful treatment with ALK-TKI might be required, even for patients who experience recurrence after surgery. In order to fully elucidate these relationships, it is necessary to accumulate information obtained, not only by clinical trials, but also from clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

MI, NH, KF, HSa and YS designed the study. MI, HIc, SU, KI, OI, RN, YI, HS, MaK, KK, MoK, SY, MS, NK, KF collected the data. MI, KM and HSa analyzed the data and prepared the article. All authors approved the final version of the article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mito Kyodo General Hospital-Mito Medical Center, University of Tsukuba (approval no. 16-66, 18-15).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Daniels MG, Bowman RV, Yang IA, Govindan R and Fong KM: An emerging place for lung cancer genomics in 2013. J Thorac Dis. 5 (Suppl 5):S491–S497. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J and Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 59:225–249. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Singhal S, Miller D, Ramalingam S and Sun SY: Gene expression profiling of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 60:313–324. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Pao W and Girard N: New driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 12:175–180. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG, et al: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 350:2129–2139. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Bronte G, Rizzo S, La Paglia L, Adamo V, Siragusa S, Ficorella C, Santini D, Bazan V, Colucci G, Gebbia N and Russo A: Driver mutations and differential sensitivity to targeted therapies: A new approach to the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 36 (Suppl 3):S21–S29. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Delmonte A, Burgio MA, Verlicchi A, Bronte G, Cravero P, Ulivi P, Martinelli G and Crinò L: New generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 8 (Suppl 3):S280–S289. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Stinchcombe TE: Targeted therapies for lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 170:165–182. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Blackhall FH, Peters S, Bubendorf L, Dafni U, Kerr KM, Hager H, Soltermann A, O'Byrne KJ, Dooms C, Sejda A, et al: Prevalence and clinical outcomes for patients with ALK-positive resected stage I to III adenocarcinoma: Results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape Project. J Clin Oncol. 32:2780–2787. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Wu SG, Kuo YW, Chang YL, Shih JY, Chen YH, Tsai MF, Yu CJ, Yang CH and Yang PC: EML4-ALK translocation predicts better outcome in lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR. J Thorac Oncol. 7:98–104. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Kim HR, Shim HS, Chung JH, Lee YJ, Hong YK, Rha SY, Kim SH, Ha SJ, Kim SK, Chung KY, et al: Distinct clinical features and outcomes in never-smokers with nonsmall cell lung cancer who harbor EGFR or KRAS mutations or ALK rearrangement. Cancer. 118:729–739. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Zhou JX, Yang H, Deng Q, Gu X, He P, Lin Y, Zhao M, Jiang J, Chen H, Lin Y, et al: Oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer at various clinical stages. Ann Oncol. 24:1319–1325. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Gao Q, Li P, Jiang X, Zhan Z, Yan Q, Zhang B and Huang C: Worse disease-free, tumor-specific, and overall survival in surgically-resected lung adenocarcinoma patients with ALK rearrangement. Oncotarget. 8:86066–86081. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Shin SH, Lee H, Jeong BH, Choi YS, Shin MH, Kim S, Han J, Lee KS, Shim YM, Kwon OJ and Kim H: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement in surgically resected stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 10:3460–3467. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Kim MH, Shim HS, Kang DR, Jung JY, Lee CY, Kim DJ, Lee JG, Bae MK, Kim HR, Lim SM, et al: Clinical and prognostic implications of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 83:389–395. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Li P, Gao Q, Jiang X, Zhan Z, Yan Q, Li Z and Huang C: Comparison of clinicopathological features and prognosis between ALK rearrangements and EGFR mutations in surgically resected early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. J Cancer. 10:61–71. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Seto K, Kuroda H, Yoshida T, Sakata S, Mizuno T, Sakakura N, Hida T, Yatabe Y and Sakao Y: Higher frequency of occult lymph node metastasis in clinical N0 pulmonary adenocarcinoma with ALK rearrangement. Cancer Manag Res. 10:2117–2124. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Yang P, Kulig K, Boland JM, Erickson-Johnson MR, Oliveira AM, Wampfler J, Jatoi A, Deschamps C, Marks R, Fortner C, et al: Worse disease-free survival in never-smokers with ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 7:90–97. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Sun JM, Lira M, Pandya K, Choi YL, Ahn JS, Mao M, Han J, Park K, Ahn MJ and Kim J: Clinical characteristics associated with ALK rearrangements in never-smokers with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 83:259–264. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Fukui T, Yatabe Y, Kobayashi Y, Tomizawa K, Ito S, Hatooka S, Matsuo K and Mitsudomi T: Clinicoradiologic characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EML4-ALK fusion oncogene. Lung Cancer. 77:319–325. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Paik JH, Choi CM, Kim H, Jang SJ, Choe G, Kim DK, Kim HJ, Yoon H, Lee CT, Jheon S, et al: Clinicopathologic implication of ALK rearrangement in surgically resected lung cancer: A proposal of diagnostic algorithm for ALK rearranged adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 76:403–409. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Mizuno T, Arimura T, Kuroda H, Sakakura N, Yatabe Y and Sakao Y: Current outcomes of postrecurrence survival in patients after resection of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 10:1788–1796. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Lee JK, Park HS, Kim DW, Kulig K, Kim TM, Lee SH, Jeon YK, Chung DH, Heo DS, Kim WH and Bang YJ: Comparative analyses of overall survival in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive and matched wild-type advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 118:3579–3586. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Tantraworasin A, Lertprasertsuke N, Kongkarnka S, Euathrongchit J, Wannasopha Y and Saeteng S: Retrospective study of ALK rearrangement and clinicopathological implications in completely resected non- small cell lung cancer patients in Northern Thailand: Role of screening with D5F3 antibodies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 15:3057–3063. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Tao H, Cai Y, Shi L, Tang J and Liu Z, Wang Z, Bai L and Liu Z: Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive and surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Thorac Cancer. 8:8–15. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Jin Y, Chen Y, Yu X and Shi X: A real-world study of treatment patterns and survival outcome in advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 15:8703–8710. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2021
Volume 14 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Inagaki M, Ichimura H, Usui S, Iguchi K, Ishibashi O, Nakamura R, Inage Y, Suzuki H, Kiyoshima M, Kamiyama K, Kamiyama K, et al: A population‑based study of outcomes in patients with surgically resected non‑small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase‑rearranged mutations: A matched‑pair study. Mol Clin Oncol 14: 11, 2021
APA
Inagaki, M., Ichimura, H., Usui, S., Iguchi, K., Ishibashi, O., Nakamura, R. ... Sato, Y. (2021). A population‑based study of outcomes in patients with surgically resected non‑small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase‑rearranged mutations: A matched‑pair study. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 14, 11. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2173
MLA
Inagaki, M., Ichimura, H., Usui, S., Iguchi, K., Ishibashi, O., Nakamura, R., Inage, Y., Suzuki, H., Kiyoshima, M., Kamiyama, K., Kimura, M., Yoshida, S., Sakai, M., Kobayashi, N., Furukawa, K., Satoh, H., Hizawa, N., Sato, Y."A population‑based study of outcomes in patients with surgically resected non‑small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase‑rearranged mutations: A matched‑pair study". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 14.1 (2021): 11.
Chicago
Inagaki, M., Ichimura, H., Usui, S., Iguchi, K., Ishibashi, O., Nakamura, R., Inage, Y., Suzuki, H., Kiyoshima, M., Kamiyama, K., Kimura, M., Yoshida, S., Sakai, M., Kobayashi, N., Furukawa, K., Satoh, H., Hizawa, N., Sato, Y."A population‑based study of outcomes in patients with surgically resected non‑small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase‑rearranged mutations: A matched‑pair study". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 14, no. 1 (2021): 11. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2173