Open Access

Association between fatty acid synthase and adipophilin expression in triple‑negative breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Katsuhiro Yoshikawa
    • Mitsuaki Ishida
    • Hirotsugu Yanai
    • Koji Tsuta
    • Mitsugu Sekimoto
    • Tomoharu Sugie
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 9, 2022     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2513
  • Article Number: 80
  • Copyright: © Yoshikawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

It is well known that cancer cells produce energy via anaerobic glycolysis. Lipid metabolism is often upregulated in numerous types of cancer. Our previous study demonstrated that adipophilin (ADP), a lipid‑associated protein, was a poor prognostic indicator in patients with triple‑negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the mechanism of ADP expression in TNBC remains unclear. Fatty acid synthase (FASN) is a crucial enzyme in 7 fatty acid synthesis, and its upregulation has been reported in several types of carcinomas; however, to the best of our knowledge, the association of FASN and ADP in TNBC remains unclear. The present study analysed the association between FASN and ADP expression and the prognostic significance of FASN in TNBC. Using immunohistochemical methods and tissue microarrays, the present study examined FASN expression in 61 patients with TNBC. Overall and relapse‑free survival and their risk factors were analysed for FASN expression and compared with ADP expression. A total of 40 (65.6%) patients were classified as FASN‑high (score ≥120), and this was significantly associated with a lower Ki‑67 labelling index (P=0.011). FASN expression was not associated with relapse‑free survival and overall survival. FASN‑high was negatively associated with ADP expression (P=0.041). The results of the present study revealed that FASN‑high was associated with a lack of ADP expression and a lower Ki‑67 labelling index. These results indicated that de novo fatty acid synthesis by FASN is not the main pathway of lipogenesis and the source of energy in cancer cells of ADP‑positive highly proliferative TNBC.

Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), characterised by the lack of oestrogen and progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, occurs in approximately 12-17% of breast cancer patients (1,2). It shows an aggressive clinical behaviour and a high rate of local and distant relapse after treatment compared to other subtypes of breast cancer (2-4). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new treatments and biomarkers for TNBC. While normal cells mainly produce energy by aerobic phosphorylation through the tricarboxylic acid cycle, cancer cells produce energy via anaerobic glycolysis and other metabolic pathways. Oncogenic metabolic pathways differ depending on the tumour type; therefore, developing therapies against tumour metabolism is not straightforward (5). Lipid metabolism is a crucial pathway in tumour progression, and cancer cells typically accumulate lipids (6,7).

Adipophilin (ADP) is a lipid-associated protein that coats the surface of intracytoplasmic lipid droplets (8,9) ADP expression in tumour cells is correlated with a poor prognosis in some types of carcinomas, including lung adenocarcinoma (10) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (11). Recently, we demonstrated via multivariate analysis that ADP expression is an independent indicator of a poor prognosis for patients with TNBC, while widely used prognostic factors, such as the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) and the Nottingham Prognostic Index, and tumor size were not independent (12). Fatty acid synthase (FASN) is a critical lipogenic enzyme overexpressed in various human cancers, including salivary gland tumours (13,14). FASN expression has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in several types of tumours (15,16); thus, ADP expression in carcinoma cells might be related and occur via overexpression of FASN. In addition, FASN expression has been reported to correlate with the frequency of lymph node metastasis but is uncorrelated with prognosis in TNBC (17). Although an inverse correlation between FASN and ADP expression has been reported in salivary duct carcinomas (18), the relationship between FASN and ADP in TNBC remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of FASN expression and assess the correlation between FASN and ADP expression in TNBC patients.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

We selected 165 consecutive patients with TNBC who underwent surgical resection at the Department of Surgery of the Kansai Medical University Hospital between January 2006 and December 2018. Patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type according to the recent World Health Organization Classification of Breast Tumors (19) were selected. The exclusion criteria of the present study were as follows: patients who were administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who had a particular type of invasive carcinoma, such as apocrine carcinoma. The study cohort comprised 61 TNBC patients.

The patient cohort in the present study overlaps with that of our previous studies (12,20,21). Our previous study analysed the prognostic significance of ADP expression in tissue microarrays using operative specimens from patients with TNBC (12). The present study included information regarding the ADP expression status of operative specimens from the previous study (12). Moreover, we previously examined the relationship between clinicopathological features and PD-L1-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts (20) or CD155, an immune-checkpoint protein (21), in patients with TNBC using tissue microarrays from operative specimens. The contents of the present study do not overlap with those of these two studies (20,21).

This retrospective single-institution study was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Kansai Medical University Hospital (Approval #2019234). All the data were anonymised. The institutional review board waived the requirement for informed consent because of the retrospective design of the study using medical records and archival samples, with no risk to the participants. Moreover, the present study does not include minors. Information regarding this study, such as the inclusion criteria and opportunity to opt out, was provided through the institutional website (https://www.kmu.ac.jp/hirakata/hospital/2671t800000136cd-att/a1582783269511.pdf).

Histopathological analysis

Surgically resected specimens were fixed with formalin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. More than two experienced pathologists independently evaluated histopathological features. We used the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Eighth edition. The histopathological grading was based on the Nottingham histological grade (22). The Ki-67 labelling index (LI) was considered high when ≥40% of neoplastic cells were labelled (23).

Tissue microarray

Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were used to select the most morphologically representative carcinoma regions; three tissue cores of 2 mm in diameter were punched out from the paraffin-embedded blocks for each patient. Tissue cores were arrayed in the recipient paraffin blocks. These specimens were also used in our previous study (12,20,21).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical analyses were performed using an autostainer (Discovery Ultra System; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's instructions [OptiView DAB Universal Kit (cat. no. 518-111427; Roche)]. Primary mouse monoclonal antibody against FASN (clone 23: BD Biosciences; diluted 1:200) was used. Secondary antibody was pre-diluted [OptiView DAB Universal Kit (cat. no. 518-111427; Roche)]. At least two researchers independently evaluated immunohistochemical staining.

FASN was analysed using a combined scoring system based on the proportion of positive tumour cells (0-100%) and the predominant staining intensity in the tumour (18,24). The FASN staining intensity was scored as follows: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong (Fig. 1). The FASN score (0-300) was calculated by multiplying the percentage by the staining intensity. FASN was classified into two groups based on the FASN score: low (<120) and high (≥120), according to a previous report (18).

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 27.0 (IBM, Inc.). Correlations between two groups were determined using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. The rates of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests were used to compare the groups. The statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

Table I summarises the clinicopathological features of the present cohort. The cohort of this study is fundamentally identical to that previously reported regarding ADP expression in TNBC (12). This study included 61 women with TNBC. The median age at the time of initial diagnosis was 58 years (range, 31-93 years). All patients were diagnosed with TNBC based on biopsy results. All samples were invasive carcinomas of no special type. No discrepancy was found in the pathological diagnosis and molecular subtype between the preoperative biopsy and operative specimens. The median observation period was 61 months (range: 11-173 months). Eleven (18.0%) patients experienced relapse (all had distant metastasis, and none experienced local recurrence), and nine (14.3%) patients died of the disease.

Table I

Clinical characteristics of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Table I

Clinical characteristics of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

FactorsValue
Total, n61
Median age, years (range)68 (31-93)
Menopausal status, n (%) 
     Premenopausal9 (14.8)
     Postmenopausal51 (83.6)
     Unknown1 (1.6)
Median BMI (range)23.3 (16.2-32.2)
Median tumor size, mm (range)20 (2-55)
Pathological stage, n (%) 
     I25 (41.0)
     IIA23 (37.7)
     IIB5 (8.2)
     IIIA4 (6.6)
     IIIB3 (4.9)
     IIIC1 (1.6)
Lymph node status, n (%) 
     Positive14 (23.0)
     Negative33 (54.1)
     Not tested14 (23.0)
Lymphatic invasion, n (%) 
     Positive53 (86.9)
     Negative8 (13.1)
Venous invasion, n (%) 
     Positive37 (60.7)
     Negative24 (39.3)
Nottingham histological grade, n (%) 
     12 (3.3)
     227 (44.3)
     332 (52.5)
Ki-67 labeling index, n (%) 
     High37 (60.7)
     Low21 (34.4)
     Not tested3 (4.9)
Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) 
     Performed35 (57.4)
     Not performed23 (37.7)
     Undetermined3 (4.9)
Correlation between clinicopathological factors and FASN expression

Table II shows the correlation between FASN expression and the clinicopathological factors in the study cohort. Forty patients (65.6%) were FASN-positive and 21 (34.4%) were FASN-negative. Typically, FASN expression was observed in the cytoplasm of neoplastic cells (Fig. 1).

Table II

Association between clinicopathological factors and FASN expression.

Table II

Association between clinicopathological factors and FASN expression.

FactorsFASN-high (n=40)FASN-low (n=21)P-value
Age, years (median ± SD)64±1566±150.773
Body mass index, kg/m2 (median ± SD)23.5±3.523.3±4.10.820
Menopausal status, n   
     Premenopausal63>0.999
     Postmenopausal3417 
     Unknown01 
Tumor size, n   
     ≤20 mm16130.104
     >20 mm248 
Pathological stage, n   
     I+II34190.703
     III62 
Lymph node status, n   
     Positive1130.321
     Negative2013 
     Not tested95 
Lymphatic invasion, n   
     Positive33200.243
     Negative71 
Venous invasion, n   
     Positive25120.684
     Negative159 
Nottingham histological grade, n   
     1+219100.993
     32111 
Ki-67 labeling index, n   
     High19180.011
     Low183 
     Not tested30 
Adjuvant chemotherapy, n   
     Performed24110.546
     Not performed149 
     Undetermined21 

[i] FASN, fatty acid synthase.

FASN expression did not correlate with any clinical factors, including age, menopausal status, body mass index, or adjuvant chemotherapy. A lower Ki-67 LI was significantly correlated with FASN expression (P=0.011), but not with other factors, such as tumour diameter, pathological stage, histological grade, lymphatic and venous invasion, or lymph node status.

Correlation between FASN expression and prognosis

The median RFS of FASN-high and -low patients was 53 and 64 months, respectively, and the median OS of FASN-high and -low patients was 59 and 64 months, respectively. FASN expression was not correlated with RFS or OS (Fig. 2, P=0.611 and P=0.727, respectively).

Correlation between ADP and FASN expression

As previously reported, ADP expression was positive in 14 patients (23%) and negative in 47 patients (77%) (12). The correlations between ADP and FASN expression are shown in Table III. A significant negative correlation was observed between ADP and FASN expression (P=0.041).

Table III

Association between adipophilin and fatty acid synthase expression.

Table III

Association between adipophilin and fatty acid synthase expression.

 Fatty acid synthase 
AdipophilinHigh, nLow, nP-value
Positive68 
Negative34130.041

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that FASN-high was significantly negatively correlated with ADP expression and a lower Ki-67 LI. FASN expression was not correlated with RFS and OS in patients with TNBC.

Fatty acids are essential components of all cells as they constitute the lipid membrane and are important substrates for energy metabolism. FASN synthesises long-chain fatty acids using acetyl-CoA as a primer, malonyl-CoA as a two-carbon donor, and the predominant product of this enzyme is a 16-carbon fatty acid, palmitate (13). Under normal conditions, FASN converts excess carbohydrates into fatty acids, leading to esterification to store triacylglycerols. In non-neoplastic tissues, FASN expression is observed in the high lipid metabolic tissues, including adipocytes, hepatocytes, sebaceous glands, and hormone-sensitive tissues, such as the endometrium, prostate, and adrenal cortex, and its expression is low in other non-neoplastic cells (24). It is well known that lactic acid synthesis via anaerobic glycolysis is highly upregulated in cancer cells (Warburg effect), and excess pyruvate is synthesised for de novo fatty acid synthesis via acetyl-CoA to maintain cell membrane production in proliferative cancer cells (13). Therefore, upregulation of FASN has been reported in some types of carcinomas (25,26), including non-small cell lung cancer (27), oral squamous cell carcinoma (28), colon cancer (15), bladder cancer (16), salivary gland tumour (18) and malignant melanoma (29).

In breast cancer, FASN expression has been addressed in some studies. FASN expression was significantly higher in the HER2 subtype and lower in the luminal subtype and TNBC (30). In one report, high FASN was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis but not with pathological stage, tumour cell proliferative activity (Ki-67), and disease-free and OS in patients with TNBC (17). In another report, FASN expression was significantly correlated with pathological stage and lymph node metastasis in patients with TNBC (31). In the present cohort, FASN-high was significantly correlated with a lower Ki-67 LI and was not correlated with patient prognosis.

Interestingly, ADP expression was significantly negatively correlated with FASN expression. A previous study demonstrated that ADP expression was significantly correlated with a higher Ki-67 LI (12); therefore, lower FASN expression was significantly correlated with ADP expression and a higher Ki-67 LI. The correlation between ADP and FASN has only been evaluated in salivary duct carcinoma, a highly aggressive type of salivary gland carcinoma (18), and the present study is the first to address this correlation in TNBC. In salivary duct carcinoma, ADP expression was also a significantly poor prognostic marker of progression-free and OS by multivariate analysis and was negatively correlated with FASN expression, which is consistent with the results of our present and previous studies in patients with TNBC (12). These results suggest that de novo fatty acid synthesis by FASN is not the main pathway of lipogenesis and a source of energy for cancer cells in ADP-positive highly proliferative TNBC and salivary duct carcinoma.

ADP expression reflects the intracellular lipid accumulation in cancer cells (10-12,18). ADP expression was significantly associated with higher proliferative activity in cancer cells in breast cancer, including TNBC (12,32) and salivary duct carcinoma (18). Thus, ADP expression might be associated with higher proliferative activity, leading to a poor prognosis. Although the detailed mechanism of ADP expression in cancer cells remains unclear, ADP expression in cancer cells might reflect upregulation of lipid metabolism correlating with a higher proliferative capacity and production of cell membranes of cancer cells in a hypoxic tumour microenvironment (12). As described earlier, FASN is well known to be a central enzyme complex in de novo fatty acid synthesis, and both ADP and FASN have been known to be activated under hypoxic conditions (13,33,34). ADP expression was significantly negatively correlated with FASN expression in TNBC and salivary duct carcinoma (18). Therefore, lipid accumulation in TNBC and salivary duct carcinoma was not correlated with upregulation of de novo fatty acid synthesis. Lipid acumination can be derived from lipid uptake and neutral lipid synthesis (35). Thus, the mechanism of ADP expression in TNBC other than the FASN pathway must be clarified to address the new therapeutic strategy in ADP-positive TNBC patients with a poorer prognosis.

Although the prognostic significance of FASN expression in TNBC remains controversial, FASN is considered a potential therapeutic target (36). It has been shown that blocking FASN has anticancer effect via the apoptotic pathway in vitro and in vivo (37-39). Moreover, the effectiveness of simultaneous blocking of FASN and epidermal growth factor receptors has also been reported in preclinical models of chemoresistant TNBC (40). The usefulness of orlistat, an anti-obesity drug, in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer has also been reported (28). Accordingly, FASN can be a potential therapeutic target for patients with TNBC, and the detailed mechanism of FASN expression and correlation of ADP expression in TNBC using both experimental animal model and human cultured cells must be clarified.

There are some limitations to the present study. First, this was a retrospective single-institution study with a small sample size, which could have led to selection bias. Second, tissue microarray cores of 2 mm diameter were used to determine FASN and ADP expression. Hence, there could have been a heterogeneous expression in the cancer tissues, despite our selection of regions that were morphologically most representative of cancer. Third, since chemotherapy may affect FASN expression, this study excluded patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, additional studies with larger patient populations are needed to clarify these issues.

In conclusion, FASN expression was significantly negatively correlated with ADP expression in TNBC. ADP expression reflects lipid acumination in cancer cells; however, its mechanism other than de novo lipogenesis synthesised by FASN via acetyl-CoA might be present. Thus, additional studies are needed to analyse the mechanism of ADP expression, a significantly poor prognostic marker, leading to a new therapeutic strategy for patients with ADP-positive TNBC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported in part by Japan Agency for Medical research and Development (grant no. JP21lm0203006), the Osaka Community Foundation 2020, and research grants D1 and D2 from Kansai Medical University.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

KY and MI conceived and designed the study. KY and MI performed immunohistochemical analyses. KY, MI, HY, KT, MS and TS acquired and analyzed data. KY and MI confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. KY and MI drafted the manuscript and prepared tables and figures. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Kansai Medical University Hospital (protocol no. 2019234; Hirakata, Osaka, Japan). The institutional review board waived the requirement for informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Cleator S, Heller W and Coombes RC: Triple-negative breast cancer: Therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 8:235–244. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P and Narod SA: Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 13:4429–4434. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, et al: Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the carolina breast cancer study. JAMA. 295:2492–2502. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Metzger-Filho O, Tutt A, De Azambuja E, Saini KS, Viale G, Loi S, Bradbury I, Bliss JM, Azim HA Jr, Ellis P, et al: Dissecting the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 30:1879–1887. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Moreno-Sánchez R, Rodríguez-Enríquez S, Marín-Hernández A and Saavedra E: Energy metabolism in tumor cells. FEBS J. 274:1393–1418. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Porporato PE, Payen VL, Baselet B and Sonveaux P: Metabolic changes associated with tumor metastasis, part 2: Mitochondria, lipid and amino acid metabolism. Cell Mol Life Sci. 73:1349–1363. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Straub BK, Gyoengyoesi B, Koenig M, Hashani M, Pawella LM, Herpel E, Mueller W, Macher-Goeppinger S, Heid H and Schirmacher P: Adipophilin/perilipin-2 as a lipid droplet-specific marker for metabolically active cells and diseases associated with metabolic dysregulation. Histopathology. 62:617–631. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Bickel PE, Tansey JT and Welte MA: PAT proteins, an ancient family of lipid droplet proteins that regulate cellular lipid stores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1791:419–440. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Sztalryd C and Kimmel AR: Perilipins: Lipid droplet coat proteins adapted for tissue-specific energy storage and utilization, and lipid cytoprotection. Biochimie. 96:96–101. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Fujimoto M, Yoshizawa A, Sumiyoshi S, Sonobe M, Menju T, Hirata M, Momose M, Date H and Haga H: Adipophilin expression in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with apocrine-like features and poor clinical prognosis: An immunohistochemical study of 328 cases. Histopathology. 70:232–241. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Hashimoto Y, Ishida M, Ryota H, Yamamoto T, Kosaka H, Hirooka S, Yamaki S, Kotsuka M, Matsui Y, Yanagimoto H, et al: Adipophilin expression is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: An immunohistochemical analysis. Pancreatology. 19:443–448. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Yoshikawa K, Ishida M, Yanai H, Tsuta K, Sekimoto M and Sugie T: Adipophilin expression is an independent marker for poor prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer: An immunohistochemical study. PLoS One. 15(e0242563)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Menendez JA and Lupu R: Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:763–777. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Díaz KP, Gondak R, Martins LL, de Almeida OP, León JE, Mariano FV, Altemani A and Vargas PA: Fatty acid synthase and Ki-67 immunoexpression can be useful for the identification of malignant component in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 48:232–238. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Ogino S, Nosho K, Meyerhardt JA, Kirkner GJ, Chan AT, Kawasaki T, Giovannucci EL, Loda M and Fuchs CS: Cohort study of fatty acid synthase expression and patient survival in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:5713–5720. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Abdelrahman AE, Rashed HE, Elkady E, Elsebai EA, El-Azony A and Matar I: Fatty acid synthase, Her2/neu, and E2F1 as prognostic markers of progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol. 39:42–52. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Giró-Perafita A, Sarrats A, Pérez-Bueno F, Oliveras G, Buxó M, Brunet J, Viñas G and Miquel TP: Fatty acid synthase expression and its association with clinico-histopathological features in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget. 8:74391–74405. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Hirai H, Tada Y, Nakaguro M, Kawakita D, Sato Y, Shimura T, Tsukahara K, Kano S, Ozawa H, Okami K, et al: The clinicopathological significance of the adipophilin and fatty acid synthase expression in salivary duct carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 477:291–299. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Rakha EA, Allison KH, Bu H, Ellis IO, Foschini MP, Horii R, et al: Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type. In: WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th edition. Breast Tumours IARC, Lyon, pp102-109, 2019.

20 

Yoshikawa K, Ishida M, Yanai H, Tsuta K, Sekimoto M and Sugie T: Prognostic significance of PD-L1-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 21(239)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Yoshikawa K, Ishida M, Yanai H, Tsuta K, Sekimoto M and Sugie T: Immunohistochemical analysis of CD155 expression in triple-negative breast cancer patients. PLoS One. 16(e0253176)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Elston CW and Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 19:403–410. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Wu Q, Ma G, Deng Y, Luo W, Zhao Y, Li W and Zhou Q: Prognostic value of Ki-67 in patients with resected triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 9(1068)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Kusakabe T, Maeda M, Hoshi N, Sugino T, Watanabe K, Fukuda T and Suzuki T: Fatty acid synthase is expressed mainly in adult hormone-sensitive cells or cells with high lipid metabolism and in proliferating fetal cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 48:613–622. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Khan W, Augustine D, Rao RS, Patil S, Awan KH, Sowmya SV, Haragannavar VC and Prasad K: Lipid metabolism in cancer: A systematic review. J Carcinog. 20(4)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Zhang J, Song Y, Shi Q and Fu L: Research progress on FASN and MGLL in the regulation of abnormal lipid metabolism and the relationship between tumor invasion and metastasis. Front Med. 15:649–656. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Ali A, Levantini E, Teo JT, Goggi J, Clohessy JG, Wu CS, Chen L, Yang H, Krishnan I, Kocher O, et al: Fatty acid synthase mediates EGFR palmitoylation in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 10(e8313)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Aquino IG, Bastos DC, Cuadra-Zelaya FJM, Teixeira IF, Salo T, Coletta RD and Graner E: Anticancer properties of the fatty acid synthase inhibitor TVB-3166 on oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Arch Oral Biol. 113(104707)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

de Andrade BA, León JE, Carlos R, Delgado-Azañero W, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Graner E and de Almeida OP: Expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN) in oral nevi and melanoma. Oral Dis. 17:808–812. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Jung YY, Kim HM and Koo JS: Expression of lipid metabolism-related proteins in metastatic breast cancer. PLoS One. 10(e0137204)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Jiang W, Xing XL, Zhang C, Yi L, Xu W, Ou J and Zhu N: MET and FASN as prognostic biomarkers of triple negative breast cancer: A systematic evidence landscape of clinical study. Front Oncol. 11(604801)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Kuniyoshi S, Miki Y, Sasaki A, Iwabuchi E, Ono K, Onodera Y, Hirakawa H, Ishida T, Yoshimi N and Sasano H: The significance of lipid accumulation in breast carcinoma cells through perilipin 2 and its clinicopathological significance. Pathol Int. 69:463–471. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Saarikoski ST, Rivera SP and Hankinson O: Mitogen-inducible gene 6 (MIG-6), adipophilin and tuftelin are inducible by hypoxia. FEBS Lett. 530:186–190. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Ni T, He Z, Dai Y, Yao J, Guo Q and Wei L: Oroxylin A suppresses the development and growth of colorectal cancer through reprogram of HIF1α-modulated fatty acid metabolism. Cell Death Dis. 8(e2865)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Chang R, Chou MC, Hung LY, Wang ME, Hsu MC and Chiu CH: Study of valproic acid-enhanced hepatocyte steatosis. BioMed Res Int. 2016(9576503)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Menendez JA and Lupu R: Fatty acid synthase (FASN) as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 21:1001–1016. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Puig T, Turrado C, Benhamú B, Aguilar H, Relat J, Ortega-Gutiérrez S, Casals G, Marrero PF, Urruticoechea A, Haro D, et al: Novel inhibitors of fatty acid synthase with anticancer activity. Clin Cancer Res. 15:7608–7615. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Blancafort A, Giró-Perafita A, Oliveras G, Palomeras S, Turrado C, Campuzano Ò, Carrion-Salip D, Massaguer i Vall-llovera A, Brugada R, Palafox Sánchez M, et al: Dual fatty acid synthase and HER2 signaling blockade shows marked antitumor activity against breast cancer models resistant to anti-HER2 drugs. PLoS One. 10(e0131241)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Qu H, Shan K, Tang C, Cui G, Fu G, Qi Y, Cui J, Li J, Wang R, Feng N, et al: A novel small-molecule fatty acid synthase inhibitor with antitumor activity by cell cycle arrest and cell division inhibition. Eur J Med Chem. 219(113407)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Giró-Perafita A, Palomeras S, Lum DH, Blancafort A, Viñas G, Oliveras G, Pérez-Bueno F, Sarrats A, Welm AL and Puig T: Preclinical evaluation of fatty acid synthase and EGFR inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 22:4687–4697. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2022
Volume 16 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yoshikawa K, Ishida M, Yanai H, Tsuta K, Sekimoto M and Sugie T: Association between fatty acid synthase and adipophilin expression in triple‑negative breast cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 16: 80, 2022
APA
Yoshikawa, K., Ishida, M., Yanai, H., Tsuta, K., Sekimoto, M., & Sugie, T. (2022). Association between fatty acid synthase and adipophilin expression in triple‑negative breast cancer. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 16, 80. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2513
MLA
Yoshikawa, K., Ishida, M., Yanai, H., Tsuta, K., Sekimoto, M., Sugie, T."Association between fatty acid synthase and adipophilin expression in triple‑negative breast cancer". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 16.4 (2022): 80.
Chicago
Yoshikawa, K., Ishida, M., Yanai, H., Tsuta, K., Sekimoto, M., Sugie, T."Association between fatty acid synthase and adipophilin expression in triple‑negative breast cancer". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 16, no. 4 (2022): 80. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2513