Risk factors in non‑surviving patients with infection with carbapenemase‑producing Enterobacterales strains in an intensive care unit
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 14, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2023.90
- Article Number: 30
-
Copyright : © Vlad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
Abstract
Introduction
As early as 2010, there were concerns about the spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in healthcare facilities in Europe; therefore, the European Union (EU) member states proposed an assessment of the risks of spreading CPE from one patient to another (1).
Although the prevalence of CPE within the EU community is not well known, it is acknowledged that these strains are endemic to certain countries, including Romania (1). Carbapenemases are β-lactamases that efficiently hydrolyze most β-lactams, including carbapenems (1). CPE and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) strains usually include Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (1,2).
The European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) claims that CRE is associated with a high mortality rate; thus, it is considered that patients infected with CPE also have a high risk of mortality. The ECDC also affirms that the causes of death are due to the limitations of treatment options or due to delays (1).
The risk factors associated with CPE infection are similar to those associated with other multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) (1,2). The risk factors for acquiring CPE are prior antimicrobial use, previous hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), the severity of illness, a duration of hospitalization >20 days, the use of antibiotics for >10 days, pneumonia or chronic pulmonary disease, and the previous use of nasogastric tubes (1,3-5).
CPE infections represent a threat to patient safety owing to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), increased morbidity and mortality, and very high hospital costs (1). The ECDC claims that in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), 33,000 individuals succumb each year as a direct consequence of MDRO infections, and >670,000 infections are caused by these organisms (6). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the USA, it has been estimated that the direct healthcare costs associated with AMR is up to 20 billion dollars (7). Otter et al (8) published an article on 40 patients from five hospitals and found that CPE outbreaks were associated with high costs. A study from 2003 to 2017 carried out in Scotland, in which 290 CPE strains from clinical and long-term healthcare surveillance cultures were detected, supported the fact that an age >60 years, systemic infection or organ failure, and the presence of non-fermenters were independently associated with 30-day mortality (9).
In another study published by Pintado et al (10), patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were observed to have an increased risk of CPE infections and were associated with a high risk of mortality. Following a systematic literature review performed by searching the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases, Hu et al (11) found that the risk factors most frequently associated with CRE mortality were antibiotic use, comorbidities and hospital-related factors (11).
The available data on the mortality of patients with CPE and the associated risk factors in Romania are not sufficient. International data identified through the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS Net) support the fact that in Romania, the rates of CRE are increased, and the levels of AMR in Romania are a matter of concern (6,12).
The present study aimed to identify CPE strains and assess the risk factors for mortality in patients with CPE strains who were hospitalized in the ICU.
Patients and methods
Study design
A retrospective, case-control study was conducted in a single center, which included patients confirmed to be infected wiht CPE between September, 2017 and October, 2021, who were admitted to the ICU of the Infectious Diseases Hospital of Constanta, Romania. The inclusion criterion was an ICU admission >24 h associated with CPE infection or colonization. The exclusion criteria were non-admission to the ICU and an ICU admission of <24 h. CPE strains were detected upon admission to the ICU or throughout the course of admission. Bacteriological screening for bacterial colonization with CPE was performed upon admission to the ICU and every 7 days after hospitalization. CPE strains were found in rectal swabs, urine cultures, sputum, blood cultures and skin swabs. Demographic, epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and treatment data were analyzed. The cause of hospitalization in the ICU was predominantly the severity of COVID-19 infection, and to a lesser extent, the CPE infection. It should be reported that CPE colonization was detected only in the ICU, which is the only department in the hospital where bacteriological screening was performed to detect these organisms.
The study population was divided into cases (patients with CPE who succumbed) and controls (patients with CPE who survived). The ICU of the Infectious Diseases Hospital of Constanta included 10 beds for critical patients with infections. The data were collected from the IT system of the hospital. Demographic, epidemiological, clinical and paraclinical data, and patient treatment data were analyzed. These data included variables such as sex, age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, admission with COVID-19 or bacterial infection, previous hospitalization or previous antibiotic therapy, leukopenia upon admission, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels >5 mg/l upon admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, CPE colonization or CPE infection, and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU. The inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data used for analysis are presented in Fig. 1.
Microbiology
In the Infectious Diseases Hospital of Constanta ICU, 73 CPE strains were detected in patients hospitalized for >24 h. There were 52 cases of CPE colonization and 21 cases of CPE infection in 64 patients. CPE colonization strains were detected by bacteriological screening using carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae chromogenic media and the Modified Hodge test. CPE strains were detected using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux) or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rosco discs and the Modified Hodge test confirmed carbapenemase production. Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was detected using the RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test. The strains were identified in the blood, sputum, urine and rectal swab tests or skin swabs. CPE strains, including Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli were identified. Colonization was distinguished from infection by an infectious disease doctor according to the patient's clinical and paraclinical criteria. A total of 27 CPE infections were detected according to the clinical and paraclinical data interpreted by the infectious disease physician. All strains detected in the rectal swab through the bacteriological screening program carried out in the ICU of the hospital were bacterial colonization and not infections. Other cultures performed at the time of admission or during hospitalization at the indication of the attending physician were interpreted as colonization or infection. Patients with colonization did not meet the criteria for inflammation and had no signs or symptoms, whereas patients with an infection had multiple signs and symptoms that were specific to an infectious disease. The antibiogram was performed only for the isolates detected in the urinary tract, sputum and blood samples, and it was not performed for the rectal swab cultures, as recommended by the hospital in terms of costs. The antibiogram was interpreted according to the guidelines of the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).
Ethical review and approval
The present study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (13). All patients provided written informed consent for the use of their personal data upon hospital admission. Patient anonymity was guaranteed during the whole process of data analysis and reporting of results. The Infectious Diseases Hospital of Constanta considered ethical review and approval unnecessary due to the retrospective nature of the study (NR 1/20/01.2023; CODE F.05.PO.17.00-ACFOCG). This study conformed to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (14).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20.0 (IBM Corp.), and the data collected were imported into Microsoft Excel. The study was divided into two groups as follows: Cases (patients with CPE strains who succumbed) and controls (patients with CPE strains who survived). The variables associated with mortality with values of P≤0.05 in the univariate analysis were evaluated using the χ2 test. Variables with values of P≤0.05 in the univariate analysis were selected for logistic regression analysis as a multivariate statistical method. The hypothesis testing was two-tailed, and a value of P≤0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 64 patients with CPE were admitted to the ICU, including 34 cases (patients with CPE who succumbed) and 30 controls (patients with CPE who survived). As demonstrated in to Table I, it was found that Klebsiella spp. strains were predominant, totaling 53 strains of which 31 were identified in patients who succumbed (with a 91.2% prevalence, out of 34 strains). Escherichia coli was detected in 3 patients (8.8%) who succumbed and in 8 patients (26.7%) who survived. In the univariate analysis, this strain in the patients did not exhibit a statistically significant difference (P>0.05). As regards the isolates detected in patients with CPE who succumbed, 27 strains (79.4%) were identified in rectal swab samples, two strains (5.9%) were identified in urine culture, eight strains (23.5%) were identified in sputum and three strains (8.8%) were identified in blood samples. Univariate analysis revealed that the source of the CPE strains was not statistically significant (P>0.05) (Table I).
As demonstrated in Fig. 2, it was observed that the majority of patients with bacterial colonies were detected in the ICU. Of the 64 patients, 53 (82.8%) were with Klebsiella spp. Of the 53 patients with Klebsiella spp., 44 (83.01%) had only carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella spp., of which 33 (75%) had colonization and 11 (25%) had bacterial infections. Of the 53 patients with Klebsiella spp., 9 patients (17%) had bacterial colonization and infection with the same carbapenenase-producing Klebsiella spp. strain.
It was also observed that the majority of patients passed away in 2021, while in 2017, all the patients with CPE strains survived (Fig. 3).
The medical history and demographic, clinical and paraclinical data of the patients are presented in Table II. Of the total number of patients who succumbed in the ICU, 24 were male (70.6%), while of those who survived, 21 were male (70%). The median age of the deceased patients was 63.88, while the median age of those who survived was 64.67. Among those who succumbed, 19 patients (55.9%) were >65 years of age. As regards comorbidities, considering a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥4, the findings were similar in both groups, with 18 patients (52.9%) in the case group and 16 (53.3%) in the control group.
Other possible predictors for mortality may be admission with COVID-19 or admission with a bacterial infection. It was determined that the number of patients with COVID-19 was 30 (88.2%) in the deceased group, and 8 (26.7%) in the control group. Admission with bacterial infection was predominant in the control group, with 17 cases (56.7%) among the patients who survived, compared to 5 cases (14.7%) among the patients who succumbed. Upon univariate analysis, a statistically significant positive association was noted between admission with COVID-19 and mortality [odds ratio (OR), 20.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.50-77.23; P=0.001].
As regards the epidemiological data, there were 7 patients (20.6%) with previous hospitalization who succumbed and 13 patients with previous hospitalization (43.3%) in the group of patients who survived. Another observation was that there were 22 patients (64.7%) who had received previous antibiotic therapy among the group of patients who succumbed during hospitalization in the ICU and 14 patients (46.7%) who had received previous antibiotic treatment among those who survived.
For the paraclinical data, 26 patients (76.5%) with leukopenia upon admission to the ICU succumbed, whereas 20 patients (66.7%) had leukopenia in the group of patients who survived. A CRP level >5 mg/l upon admission to the ICU was identified in 33 patients (97.1%) who succumbed compared to 26 patients (86.7%) who survived. It should be specified that the patients who were mechanically ventilated had a high mortality rate, compared to the patients who were not mechanically ventilated. Specifically, 13 patients (38.2%) who were mechanically ventilated succumbed, whereas among the surviving patients, only 1 patient (3.3%) was mechanically ventilated. Furthermore, univariate analysis confirmed a statistically significant positive association between invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality (OR,17.95; 95% CI, 2.17-148.08; P=0.001).
As regard the LOS in the ICU, as shown in Table II, it was found that there were 29 patients (85.3%) who had a LOS in the ICU >3 days after the CPE diagnosis among those who succumbed, while the number of patients with a LOS >3 days in the ICU among the group of patients who survived was 24 (80%). The univariate analysis of LOS >3 days after the diagnosis of CPE revealed no significant association with mortality (P>0.05).
No statistically significant differences were observed for the patient mortality and survival rates in patients with CPE colonization on the one hand, and patients with CPE infection on the other hand.
As regards the treatment prescribed to patients who were admitted to the ICU, it was observed that all patients who succumbed had received antibiotic treatment, and 26 (76.5%) of them had received reserve antibiotics. Of the 6 patients who received ceftazidime-avibactam treatment, 2 (5.9%) were in the group of patients who succumbed, and 4 (13.3%) were in the group of patients who survived. For treatment with other new antibiotics, 1 patient from the group who succumbed (2.94%) received ceftolozane-tazobactam, and 1 patient from the control group (3.3%) received imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam. Colistin was administered to 5 patients (14.7%) who succumbed and to 2 patients (6.7%) who survived. Carbapenem treatment was administered to 17 patients (50%) who died and eight patients (26.7%) survived. Other treatments, such as oral vancomycin were predominantly administered to patients who survived (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.01-0.97; P=0.025), while corticosteroid treatment was administered predominantly to patients who succumbed (OR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.49-14.52; P=0.006). The treatment data of the patients are presented in Table III.
Multivariate analysis revealed that admission with COVID-19 and invasive mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with CPE. The statistical data are presented in Table IV.
Discussion
In the present study, as in other studies, SARS-CoV-2 infection and invasive mechanical ventilation were determined to increase the risk of mortality in patients admitted to the ICU (10,15,16). Contou et al (17) claimed that patients with COVID-19 had a high mortality rate, particularly if they were intubated. In their study, they referred to a large multicenter study in which it was reported that 14% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were in critical condition experienced cardiac arrest (17). In another study, multivariate analysis revealed that the APACHE II score, age, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, increased creatinine levels, and decreased serum albumin levels were independent risk factors for mortality (18). In their study, Zhao et al (9) reported that an age >60 years, the presence of non-fermenters and systemic infection or organ failure were independently associated with 30-day mortality in patients with CPE infection.
Although there are studies that have reported an increased risk of mortality in patients with CPE infection (19,20), this was not demonstrated in the present study. In previous research, multivariate analysis revealed that mechanical ventilation and the presence of indwelling medical devices were significant risk factors for mortality in patients with CPE infection (21).
As regards LOS in the ICU, some studies have supported the fact that the majority of in-hospital deaths occurred during the first days of ICU admission, while a greater risk of mortality at a later stage was associated with discharge from the hospital, despite the need for mechanical ventilation (22,23). In the present study, it was not demonstrated that LOS in the ICU was a risk factor for mortality.
In a previous study that compared the mortality and survival rates of patients with COVID-19, paraclinical data such as lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and neutrophilia on admission were the most frequent laboratory findings in the deceased group (24). In the present study, infection with SARS-CoV-2 was positively associated with mortality in the univariate and multivariate analysis.
As regards the prescription of antibiotics, some studies have confirmed that hospitalized patients are administered irrational amounts of antibiotics, and in these cases, a higher mortality rate was documented (25,26). Despite this, in the present study, there was no association between antibiotic prescription and the mortality or survival rates of patients in the ICU, although all patients received antibiotic treatment. The only observation was that orally administered vancomycin was negatively associated with mortality in patients with CPE infection; this treatment was also administered to patients who had an associated Clostridioides difficile infection. Nevertheless, from a statistical point of view, further investigations are necessary to determine whether this treatment is a protective factor in the present study group.
Consistent with the results of other studies, it was observed that the predominant CPE strains included the Klebsiella spp. group and not Escherichia coli (27,28). The ECDC states that In Europe, on average, 1.3 patients per 10.000 hospital admissions had a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae or Escherichia coli infection, with the highest incidence found in Southern and Southeastern Europe (29), where Romania is also located.
In Romania, only a limited number of studies have been conducted on CPE strains (5,30). In a previous study conducted in the authors' hospital, the predominance of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase was documented (5) and a multicenter study conducted in eight hospitals in Romania revealed that OXA-48 carbapenemase was the most prevalent carbapenemase during the study period (30).
The present study has some limitations, in that not all the risk factors for mortality in hospitalized patients with CPE infection were investigated, and the fact that although the data were gathered from records spanning over a period of over a period of 4 years (September, 2017 to October, 2021), the number of patients was low.
In conclusion, in the present study, it was observed that the majority of CPE strains were detected in 2021, with most patients presenting bacterial colonization, with no difference in mortality regarding CPE colonization and CPE infection. The LOS in patients who acquired CPE did not influence mortality, while infection with SARS-CoV-2 increased the risk of mortality 16.16-fold, and invasive mechanical ventilation increased the risk of mortality by 14.98-fold.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from the Clinical Infection Diseases Hospital, Constanta (NR 1/20/01.2023. CODE F.05.PO.17.00-ACFOCG).
Authors' contributions
NDV and IMD conceptualized the study. ED, CSC and AD were involved in the study methodology. NDV was involved in the formal analysis, in the preparation of the original draft of the manuscript, and in the reviewing and editing of the manuscript. CGP was involved in the investigative aspects of the study. NDV BA, CI and RVM were involved in data curation. IMD and ED supervised the study. NDV and IMD confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The ethical review and approval were waived for the present study as per the requirements of the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital. Patients provided written consent to use their personal data upon admission to the hospital. Patient anonymity was guaranteed during the whole process of data analysis and reporting of results.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
|
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Risk assessment on the spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) through patient transfer between healthcare facilities, with special emphasis on cross-border transfer. Stockholm, 2011. | |
|
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, second update-26 September 2019. Stockholm, 2019. | |
|
Segagni Lusignani L, Presterl E, Zatorska B, Van den Nest M and Diab-Elschahawi M: Infection control and risk factors for acquisition of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. A 5 year (2011-2016) case-control study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 9(18)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kim YA, Lee SJ, Park YS, Lee YJ, Yeon JH, Seo YH and Lee K: Risk factors for carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales infection or colonization in a korean intensive care unit: A case-control study. Antibiotics (Basel). 9(680)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dumitru IM, Dumitrascu M, Vlad ND, Cernat RC, Ilie-Serban C, Hangan A, Slujitoru RE, Gherghina A, Mitroi-Maxim C, Curtali L, et al: Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Associated with COVID-19. Antibiotics (Basel). 10(561)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
WHO Regional Office for Europe/European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2022-2020 data. Copenhagen, 2022. | |
|
van Duin D and Doi Y: The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 8:460–469. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Otter JA, Burgess P, Davies F, Mookerjee S, Singleton J, Gilchrist M, Parsons D, Brannigan ET, Robotham J and Holmes AH: Counting the cost of an outbreak of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: An economic evaluation from a hospital perspective. Clin Microbiol Infect. 23:188–196. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhao S, Kennedy S, Perry MR, Wilson J, Chase-Topping M, Anderson E, Woolhouse MEJ and Lockhart M: Epidemiology of and risk factors for mortality due to carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect. 110:184–193. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pintado V, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Escudero-Sanchez R, Gioia F, Herrera S, Vizcarra P, Fortún J, Cobo J, Martín-Dávila P, Morosini MI, et al: Carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales infections in COVID-19 patients. Infect Dis (Lond). 54:36–45. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hu Q, Chen J, Sun S and Deng S: Mortality-related risk factors and novel antimicrobial regimens for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: A systematic review. Infect Drug Resist. 15:6907–6926. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). ECDC country visit to Romania to discuss antimicrobial resistance issues. Stockholm, 2018. | |
|
World Medical Association. World medical association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 310:2191–2194. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC and Vandenbroucke JP: STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 147:573–577. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, Bos LD, Amorim P, Pereira SM, Cazati DC, Cordioli RL, Correa TD, Pollard TJ, et al: Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: An analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med. 44:1914–1922. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pascale R, Bussini L, Gaibani P, Bovo F, Fornaro G, Lombardo D, Ambretti S, Pensalfine G, Appolloni L, Bartoletti M, et al: Carbapenem-resistant bacteria in an intensive care unit during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A multicenter before-and-after cross-sectional study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 43:461–466. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Contou D, Cally R, Sarfati F, Desaint P, Fraissé M and Plantefève G: Causes and timing of death in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 25(79)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kalın BS, Özçaylak S, Solmaz İ and Kılıç J: Assessment of risk factors for mortality in patients in medical intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med. 26:49–52. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hughes LD, Aljawadi A and Pillai A: An overview of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in trauma and orthopaedics. J Orthop. 16:455–458. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tzouvelekis LS, Markogiannakis A, Piperaki E, Souli M and Daikos GL: Treating infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Infect. 20:862–872. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mariappan S, Sekar U and Kamalanathan A: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 7:32–39. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Moitra VK, Guerra C, Linde-Zwirble WT and Wunsch H: Relationship between ICU length of stay and long-term mortality for elderly ICU survivors. Crit Care Med. 44:655–662. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Williams TA, Ho KM, Dobb GJ, Finn JC, Knuiman M and Webb SA: Royal Perth Hospital ICU Data Linkage Group. Effect of length of stay in intensive care unit on hospital and long-term mortality of critically ill adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 104:459–464. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rokni M, Ahmadikia K, Asghari S, Mashaei S and Hassanali F: Comparison of clinical, para-clinical and laboratory findings in survived and deceased patients with COVID-19: Diagnostic role of inflammatory indications in determining the severity of illness. BMC Infect Dis. 20(869)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ali M, Naureen H, Tariq MH, Farrukh MJ, Usman A, Khattak S and Ahsan H: Rational use of antibiotics in an intensive care unit: A retrospective study of the impact on clinical outcomes and mortality rate. Infect Drug Resist. 12:493–499. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pinte L, Ceasovschih A, Niculae CM, Stoichitoiu LE, Ionescu RA, Balea MI, Cernat RC, Vlad N, Padureanu V, Purcarea A, et al: Antibiotic prescription and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19: A prospective multicentre cohort study. J Pers Med. 12(877)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tzouvelekis LS, Markogiannakis A, Psichogiou M, Tassios PT and Daikos GL: Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: An evolving crisis of global dimensions. Clin Microbiol Rev. 25:682–707. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sherry NL, Lane CR, Kwong JC, Schultz M, Sait M, Stevens K, Ballard S, Gonçalves da Silva A, Seemann T, Gorrie CL, et al: Genomics for molecular epidemiology and detecting transmission of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Victoria, Australia, 2012 to 2016. J Clin Microbiol. 57:e00573–19. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Grundmann H, Glasner C, Albiger B, Aanensen DM, Tomlinson CT, Andrasević AT, Cantón R, Carmeli Y, Friedrich AW, Giske CG, et al: Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): A prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 17:153–163. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lixandru BE, Cotar AI, Straut M, Usein CR, Cristea D, Ciontea S, Tatu-Chitoiu D, Codita I, Rafila A, Nica M, et al: Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Romania: A six-month survey. PLoS One. 10(e0143214)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
