Neurological and systemic effects of cocaine toxicity: A case report and review of the literature
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 8, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.196
- Article Number: 72
-
Copyright : © Hong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
Abstract
Introduction
Historically, cocaine was utilized as a topical anesthetic and active ingredient in a variety of tonics, beverages and cure-alls (1). At present, it is a commonly abused illicit substance. The United Nations estimates the global prevalence of cocaine use to be ~0.4% (2). Cocaine abuse results in several visits to emergency departments and hospitalizations, and is responsible for a variety of neurological and system complications. The present study reports the case of a patient presenting with systemic complications and significant neurological impairment secondary to cocaine use, who made a good recovery.
Case report
A 23-year-old female presented with coma to a tertiary hospital in Canada. She last been seen in a normal condition 12-h prior and was subsequently found in bed. Collateral history revealed no preceding headache, psychiatric nor cognitive changes, focal neurological deficits, seizures, fever, neck discomfort, or any other systemic symptoms. There was no history of contact with any ill individuals, viral illness, travel, or vaccination. Her medical history disclosed no comorbidities and no prescribed medications. Her social history was significant for polysubstance use and subsequent information revealed she had recently attended a ‘pill party’.
Upon arrival to the emergency department, the patient had a temperature of 36.5˚C, a heart rate of 151 beats/min, a respiratory rate of 28 breaths/min, a blood pressure of 101/65, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4 and a glucose level of 6 mmol/l. Central painful stimuli produced extensor posturing, no verbal response and her eyes remained closed. The eyes were mid-position with no vertical eye movements on command, roving, bobbing/dipping, or gaze deviation. Her pupils were 2-3 mm and were reactive bilaterally with no hippus. A fundoscopy did not reveal any notable findings and there were no signs indicating papilledema. The remaining brainstem reflexes were intact. A more detailed motor examination revealed a normal tone throughout, 4+ reflexes symmetrically, bilateral clonus and an upgoing and equivocal plantar response on the right and left respectively. A detailed systemic examination revealed nuchal rigidity, normal otoscopy, no atypical odours and tachypnea with no irregular pattern; the respiratory examination yielded normal results; a cardiovascular examination also revealed normal results, including no murmurs; an abdominal examination did not reveal any notable findings and there were no extrahepatic signs of liver disease; there were also no concerning dermatological findings.
Simultaneous with the assessment were resuscitative measures, including the administration of 2 mg naloxone with no effect; rapid sequence induction and endotracheal intubation; fluid resuscitation with normal saline; and the use of empiric acyclovir (10 mg/kg IV q8h), ceftriaxone (2 g IV q12h) and vancomycin (20 mg/kg IV load followed by 15 mg/kg IV q12h). Investigations (Table I) included a computed tomography (CT) scan of the head that revealed bilateral hypodensities in the globus pallidus, and the loss of gray-white differentiation in both cerebellar hemispheres (Fig. 1A and B). CT angiography revealed no venous or arterial abnormalities. While optic nerve sheath diameters on point of care ultrasound and CT head were <5 mm, the concern of mass effect within the posterior fossa precluded a lumbar puncture. Initial systemic investigations revealed acute kidney injury (AKI) with myoglobinuria and granular casts, transaminitis with preserved liver function, mild rhabdomyolysis and hypokinetic apex with mildly reduced left ventricle function (Table I).
The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit. For her systemic issues, fluid resuscitation continued, and the use of N-acetylcysteine was initiated with a bolus of 150 mg/kg followed by an infusion (50 mg/kg IV over 4 h followed by 100 mg/kg over 16 h). Ampicillin (2 g IV q4h) was added for possible rhombencephalitis. As dexamethasone was not administered prior to or with antibiotics, it was not initiated. High-dose thiamine (500 mg IV q8h) was initiated. Neuroprotective measures were maintained, including fever avoidance; mean arterial pressure augmentation with norepinephrine to 80 mmHg given the posterior fossa mass effect; the avoidance of hyponatremia; the maintenance of euglycemia; and the maintenance of the partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide at 80-120 mmHg and 35-40 mmHg, respectively. An electroencephalography (EEG) revealed no seizures.
Once stabilized, efforts were directed at identifying an underlying etiology. An enhanced MRI of the brain at day 1 demonstrated restricted diffusion involving bilateral cerebellar hemispheres with posterior fossa mass effect and distended optic nerve sheaths, as well as restricted diffusion involving the bilateral hippocampus, globus pallidus, caudate nuclei, occipital lobes, periventricular region, the splenium of the corpus callosum, centrum semiovale and perirolandic area. Petechial hemorrhage was noted in the occipital lobes and globus pallidus (Fig. 2).
The urine toxicology was positive for cocaine, dextromethorphan, trazadone and zopiclone. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry yielded positive results for: Benzoylecgonine, noroxycodone, morphine and hydromorphone. Tests for other substances, including levamisole, heroin, amphetamines, barbiturates, acetaminophen and salicylate yielded negative results. The ethanol level was negative and no osmolar or anion gaps were observed to suggest a toxic alcohol ingestion.
While a lumbar puncture was not able to be performed, given the high suspicion for a toxic-metabolic encephalopathy and unremarkable systemic work-up for concerning infectious etiologies (Table I), a central nervous system (CNS) infection was considered unlikely, and antivirals and antibiotics were discontinued with cautious monitoring. This also precluded cerebrospinal fluid analysis for possible inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, as well as systemic tests, the results of which were reassuring (Table I).
A follow-up enhanced MRI of the brain and cervical spine on day 3 revealed the complete regression of the restricted diffusion, although increasing FLAIR hyperintensities and subtle enhancement in the previously affected regions were observed with no new lesions within the brain or cervical spine (Fig. 2).
As a result of the aforementioned clinical assessment and investigations, cocaine toxicity was considered to explain both her neurological presentation and associated rhabdomyolysis, AKI, hepatitis and takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
With ongoing care, the systemic disturbances of the patient rapidly improved. Neurologically, the condition of the patient remained unaltered for 10 days until she began to spontaneously open her eyes and weakly withdraw. A follow-up CT scan of the head on day 13 revealed expected evolution (Fig. 1C and D). She began to localize with questionable tracking of visual stimuli on day 14 and obeyed simple motor commands shortly thereafter. Extensive discussions and shared decision-making with family members were performed regarding her diagnosis, uncertain prognosis and ongoing care. Due to ongoing somnolence, weakness and a resulting ineffective cough, a tracheostomy was required for safe liberation from mechanical ventilation to facilitate more time for possible recovery. At the time of transfer from the intensive care unit on day 16, she could obey simple commands, but had profound spasticity in all four extremities and left hemiparesis. More detailed assessments while recovering in the ward revealed severe cognitive impairment and aphasia.
She underwent intensive rehabilitation with occupational therapy and speech language pathology focused. Her spasticity was managed with baclofen and botox, and she underwent physical therapy to regain her strength. At 3 months following her presentation, a weakness of the left iliopsoas, quadricep and tibialis anterior muscles was observed, in addition to sensory disturbances involving the anteromedial thigh. Nerve conduction analyses and electromyography testing indicated a left lumbar plexus injury with extensive denervation. After a period of 3 months, she underwent surgery to reinnervate the left femoral neve using the obturator nerve, followed by progressive improvement in strength and mobility.
The patient returned home with support at 38 weeks following her presentation and continued with outpatient rehabilitation. At 1 year from her presentation, she was able to return to university part-time to work toward an engineering degree.
Discussion
As regards the presentation of patients with coma (absent arousal and awareness), coma is the most severe syndrome on the disorders of consciousness spectrum and when presenting acutely must be regarded as a neurological emergency. Patients often lack overt signs of ongoing secondary injury and neurological decline that may only be detected with nuanced neurological exams or specialized non-invasive and invasive monitoring. This is in contrast to other medical emergencies and may give care providers a false sense of security. The approach to coma should be efficient, yet systematic and comprehensive. There are three parallel streams of thought and corresponding actions are required, including: i) Stabilization and supportive care; ii) diagnosis; and iii) management (Fig. 3).
Initial resuscitation should be focused on securing the airway (3). Cervical spine precautions should be maintained when trauma is a concern. When no anatomic airway difficulties are predicted, rapid sequence induction is preferred to avoid negative effects of the procedure on intracranial pressure. When time permits, a focused neurological examination should be performed prior, as it will be temporarily confounded by sedatives and paralytics. Hemodynamic stability must be ensured throughout intubation and thereafter to ensure adequate cerebral perfusion, while avoiding excessive hypertension. As demonstrated by the case described herein, patients may have concomitant cardiovascular issues potentially due to neurogenic stunned myocardium, a direct result of the causative disorder, or an unrelated comorbidity. Specific blood pressure parameters will depend on the clinical circumstances. Neuroprotective measures are a crucial and sometimes overlooked element of supportive care that are necessary to minimize secondary injury (4).
The differential diagnosis for causes of coma is broad (Fig. 3). These can be categorized into structural/primary neurological disorders and systemic/secondary neurological disorders and suggest that the former will often have focal signs, while the latter will not. There are exceptions to this rule, however. Patients with systemic/secondary neurological disorders may have focal deficits from prior diagnoses. Other systemic disorders have been reported to cause focal deficits (e.g., hypoglycemia). Given the relative limitations of the neurologic examination in coma, one may not detect subtle findings suggestive of structural disorders. This may also be confounded by medications utilized during resuscitation. As such, urgent neuroimaging should be obtained, unless there is an overt systemic cause.
Once neuroimaging excludes an acute vascular cause, empiric management for meningoencephalitis with acyclovir, antibiotics and dexamethasone may be prudent. Thiamine administration is also reasonable with a history of polysubstance abuse when little is known regarding the alcohol consumption of the patient. Antiseizure medications should only be administered in the case that seizures are confirmed either clinically or via EEG.
Following stabilization, extensive investigations and ongoing empiric and supportive care, the presumed cause for the coma in the patient in the present study was cocaine-induced CNS injury. Cocaine induced CNS injury occurs via three categories of pathophysiologic mechanisms. Vascular-mediated CNS damage occurs due to vasospasms, vasculitis, platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, cardioembolism and/or hypertension (5,6). Metabolic damage due to mitochondrial dysfunction causes demyelination, vacuolar degeneration, and axonal injury (5). Immune-mediated responses occur with or without levamisole. While levamisole can cause inflammation via the activation of dendritic cells, cocaine disrupts the endothelium, permitting migration of immune cells into the CNS and promotes increased levels of inflammatory cytokines (7).
Cocaine-induced CNS injury presents via a variety of mechanisms. With intoxication, patients can present with mydriasis, tics, fasciculations, vertigo, nausea and vomiting (8). Furthermore, the excessive stimulation of adrenergic and dopaminergic pathways can contribute to other neuropsychiatric sequelae, such as agitation, akathisia, formication and other hallucinations (8). Depending on the severity of symptoms, antipsychotic treatment may be indicated. Via vascular mechanisms, patients can experience isolated thunderclap headaches, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), and seizures and/or focal deficits in isolation (8,9). Cocaine-induced leukoencephalopathy resulting from metabolic and immune-mediated mechanisms often presents with cognitive impairments, and an altered level of consciousness including coma, impaired vision, and spasticity (5,10,11). The patient described herein presented predominantly with a leukoencephalopathy phenotype comprised of an altered level of consciousness, subsequent cognitive deficits and spasticity. While the initial coma could have been confounded by other medications (e.g., zopiclone, trazadone, narcotics) the lack of response to naloxone, neuroimaging, and delayed awakening suggests otherwise.
Imaging modalities are helpful in excluding other potential causes, assessing the degree of involvement, and for provide insight into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Vascular mediated damage will result in infarctions, hemorrhage, arterial inflammation, occlusions and/or segmental vasoconstriction, in addition to patterns associated with PRES. Metabolic injury causes bihemispheric white matter (FLAIR and T2) hyperintensities, often with absent restricted diffusion, and absent gadolinium enhancement on MR brain (5). Subcortical U-fibers, the brainstem and cerebellum are often spared (5). MR spectroscopy demonstrates increased lactate and/or decreased N-acetylaspartate peaks (5). Immune-mediated pathology presents with subcortical and periventricular white matter (T2/FLAIR) hyperintensities, although with variable, diffusion-weighted signal abnormality, gadolinium enhancement and surrounding edema. However, case reports of brainstem, cerebellar and globus pallidus involvement have been noted (12,13). In the present study, the CNS injury of the patient appeared to be driven by all three pathophysiologic mechanisms, including immune mediated/inflammatory despite the absence of levamisole. This was evidenced by the following: The petechial hemorrhages in the occipital lobe; both vasogenic and cytotoxic edema; the involvement of regions highly susceptible to metabolic injury including the corpus callosum and globus pallidus; in addition to the subtle gadolinium enhancement.
In addition to the CNS effects, cocaine has been shown to be associated with a multitude of systemic complications (Table II) (4,14-17). The treating physician should consider the importance of managing the systemic issues of a patient, as further systemic decline will only predispose to worsening secondary neurological injury and outcomes.
Cocaine causes increased sympathetic tone and circulating catecholamines. This simultaneously increases oxygen demand via increased chronotropy, inotropy and afterload, while decreasing supply via coronary vasoconstriction, platelet adherence and thrombus formation. Local anesthetic effects and reduced sodium transport causes conduction abnormalities and reduced ventricular function (14). A number of these mechanisms may have been in effect in the patient described herein and/or neurogenic stunned myocardium. While the patient did demonstrate evidence of a type II myocardial infarction, therapies incorporated into proposed treatment algorithms (14), such as antiplatelets/anticoagulation and nitrates were not employed due to concerns regarding intracranial hemorrhage and posterior fossa mass effect and potential intracranial hypertension respectively.
The most common hepatic presentation is hepatic necrosis, accompanied by elevated serum aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase levels, as was managed in this patient. AKI most often results from rhabdomyolysis-induced acute tubular necrosis, but can also occur due to hypertension, vasoconstriction, thrombosis, infarctions and vasculitis (15). The AKI of the patient in the present study likely resulted from several of these mechanisms as her rhabdomyolysis was mild with no myoglobinuria and a downtime of 12-h without hyperthermia would not cause significant hypovolemia.
Rhabdomyolysis results from direct muscle toxicity, seizures and muscle ischemia due to arterial vasoconstriction, and compression in situations involving prolonged downtime. When severe, one must be vigilant to monitor for resulting complications, including compartment syndrome, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcaemia in addition to AKI. Cocaine can also cause peripheral mononeuropathies, as became apparent in the course of the patient described herein. Mechanisms for this include arterial vasoconstriction, direct toxicity and/or compression (16,17).
There are also several direct and indirect drug-drug interactions with possible clinical implications in cocaine-users that physicians need to be aware of. These can occur due to changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, or due to genetic or epigenetic factors (18). The most important of which is the potential interaction with β-blockers. Cocaine promotes the release of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Τhe subsequent stimulation of β-1 receptors increases the heart rate and cardiac contractility, and β-2 receptors promote smooth muscle relaxation. α1 receptors, on the other hand, induce vasoconstriction. It has been suggested that in the context of stimulant use, β-blockers may lead to unopposed α-receptor stimulation, which can result in unopposed vasoconstriction, which in turn could cause coronary ischemia, hypertension and subsequent cardiovascular complications (18). However, this association has been recently called into question (19). Cocaine also induces an increase in serotonin synaptic activity, which may lead to the development of serotonin syndrome in the event that other serotonergic drugs are administered concurrently (e.g., fentanyl, linezolid, serotonin reuptake inhibitors). While cocaine is largely metabolized by serum esterases to inactive metabolites benzoylecgonine and ecgonine, a small portion undergoes hepatic N-demethylation by CYP3A4 to the active metabolite norcocaine, which is responsible for some of the toxic effects of cocaine. Several commonly prescribed medications are known inducers of CYP3A4 (e.g., phenytoin, carbamazepine) and may lead to increased levels of the toxic metabolite when used concurrently with cocaine (18). Additionally, the use of cocaine with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, may lead to reduction of serum esterases and shunt cocaine metabolism toward the hepatic pathway, thus increasing norcocaine formation (18).
There is no consensus available to date on the treatment for cocaine-induced CNS injury. Treatment with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis has been reported (5,11). The response to these therapies has been inconsistent. The patient in the present study received supportive care with early attention focused on preventing secondary brain injury and the management of complicating systemic factors. Later in the course, the focus shifted toward symptomatic management and rehabilitation.
Disorders of consciousness comprise a spectrum including delirium, minimally conscious state, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and coma. While bedside clinical examinations are crucial, in patients with impaired consciousness, these are relatively basic, lack sensitivity and may have inter-examiner differences. Even careful standardized neurological assessments may misclassify conscious patients as unresponsive. Research regarding the detection of covert consciousness is emerging (20).
Impaired levels of consciousness may influence the decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapies in patients with acute brain injury, such as this when prognosis is uncertain. The potential to augment the accuracy of prognostication by various tests has been researched over the years and is perhaps best established within patients post-arrest. Often, however, evidence is limited in less common disorders (21) and research regarding covert consciousness that identify patients with better prognoses has yet to be translated into clinical practice (20). It is imperative that healthcare teams remain humble regarding their own knowledge; open regarding limitations in evidence; avoid personal biases that may cause inappropriate nihilism or optimism; and be vigilant of the self-fulfilling prophecy for the neuroprognostication of patients (22). Quality of life is subjective and multifactorial and shared decision-making with families is imperative. The patient in the present study subsequently obtained a good functional neurological outcome despite the profound acute presentation.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
ZMH and JAK contributed to the conception and design of the present case report, as well as to the acquisition and interpretation of the patient's data, and in the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. ZMH and JAK confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The patient provided informed consent to participate in the present study.
Patient consent for publication
The patient provided informed consent for the publication of the present case report and any related images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Middleton RM and Kirkpatrick MB: Clinical use of cocaine. A review of the risks and benefits. Drug Saf. 9:212–217. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Annual Reports Questionnaire: Annual prevalence of drug use: Amphetamines (Internet). https://public.tableau.com/views/Prevalence-general/Prevalence-general-heatmap?:showVizHome=no. Accessed August 23, 2024. | |
Rajajee V, Riggs B and Seder DB: Emergency neurological life support: Airway, ventilation, and sedation. Neurocrit Care. 27 (Suppl 1):S4–S28. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stocchetti N, Taccone FS, Citerio G, Pepe PE, Le Roux PD, Oddo M, Polderman KH, Stevens RD, Barsan W, Maas AI, et al: Neuroprotection in acute brain injury: An up-to-date review. Crit Care. 19(186)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vosoughi R and Schmidt BJ: Multifocal leukoencephalopathy in cocaine users: A report of two cases and review of the literature. BMC Neurol. 15(208)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brewer JD, Meves A, Bostwick JM, Hamacher KL and Pittelkow MR: Cocaine abuse: Dermatologic manifestations and therapeutic approaches. J Am Acad Dermatol. 59:483–487. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Núñez MJ, Balboa J, Rey-Méndez M, Brenlla J, González-Peteiro M, Rodrigo E and Freire-Garabal M: Effects of amphetamine and cocaine on the development of acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. 26:637–643. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Richards JR and Le JK: Cocaine toxicity. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430976/. Updated June 8, 2023. | |
Farooque U, Okorie N, Kataria S, Shah SF and Bollampally VC: Cocaine-induced headache: A review of pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis, and management. Cureus. 12(e10128)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kondziella D, Danielsen ER and Arlien-Soeborg P: Fatal encephalopathy after an isolated overdose of cocaine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 78:437–438. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vitt JR, Brown EG, Chow DS and Josephson SA: Confirmed case of levamisole-associated multifocal inflammatory leukoencephalopathy in a cocaine user. J Neuroimmunol. 305:128–130. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cisneros O, Garcia de de Jesus K, Then EO and Rehmani R: Bilateral basal ganglia infarction after intranasal use of cocaine: A case report. Cureus. 11(e4405)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Renard D, Brunel H and Gaillard N: Bilateral haemorrhagic infarction of the globus pallidus after cocaine and alcohol intoxication. Acta Neurol Belg. 109:159–161. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Schwartz BG, Rezkalla S and Kloner RA: Cardiovascular effects of cocaine. Circulation. 122:2558–2569. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Glauser J and Queen JR: An overview of non-cardiac cocaine toxicity. J Emerg Med. 32:181–186. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
de Souza A, Desai PK and de Souza RJ: Acute multifocal neuropathy following cocaine inhalation. J Clin Neurosci. 36:134–136. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Beniczky S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Fabricius M and Andersen KV: Multiple mononeuropathy following cocaine abuse. BMJ Case Rep. 2009(bcr07.2008.0446)2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gallelli L, Gratteri S, Siniscalchi A, Cione E, Sirico S, Seminara P, Caroleo MC and De Sarro G: Drug-drug interactions in cocaine-users and their clinical implications. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 10:25–30. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wilson T, Pitcher I and Bach P: Avoidance of β-blockers in patients who use stimulants is not supported by good evidence. CMAJ. 194:E127–E128. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rohaut B, Eliseyev A and Claassen J: Uncovering consciousness in unresponsive ICU patients: Technical, medical and ethical considerations. Crit Care. 23(78)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wijdicks EFM: Predicting the outcome of a comatose patient at the bedside. Pract Neurol. 20:26–33. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wijdicks EFM and Hwang DY: Predicting coma trajectories: The impact of bias and noise on shared decisions. Neurocritical Care. 35:291–296. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |