International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Adnexal torsion in female patients may present as isolated torsion of the ovary, the fallopian tube, or both structures concurrently (1-3). It is most commonly associated with functional ovarian cysts, ovarian tumors-including mature cystic teratomas, cystadenomas, and malignant masses, or hydrosalpinx, which increase the risk of torsion through their size and mass effect on the ovarian pedicle (1-6). Additionally, paraovarian or paratubal masses or cysts may function as mechanical lead points, further predisposing to torsion (1-3). Adnexal torsion accounts for ~2.7-3% of gynecological emergencies and can occur across all age groups, from premenarchal to postmenopausal, with the majority of cases occurring in women of reproductive age (7-9). Ovarian torsion around its vascular pedicle initially impairs venous and lymphatic outflow, causing congestion and stromal edema (10). If not treated promptly, it can progress to arterial obstruction, leading to ischemia and the possible loss of ovarian viability (10). Clinically, adnexal torsion most commonly presents with acute-onset, unilateral lower abdominal or pelvic pain, frequently accompanied by nausea and vomiting (11). In exceedingly rare circumstances, hemoperitoneum may develop, particularly when torsion involves a solid ovarian mass such as a dysgerminoma (12). This can result from passive venous congestion, leading to the rupture of a superficial tumoral vessel and spontaneous intra-abdominal hemorrhage (12). Despite these features, the clinical manifestations of adnexal torsion are often nonspecific and may mimic other acute abdominal or gynecologic conditions, leading to potential diagnostic delay (11). Consequently, this non-specific presentation underscores the importance of imaging for accurate diagnosis, particularly in settings where prompt surgical intervention is essential to preserve ovarian function (10,13,14).
Pelvic and transvaginal ultrasonography remains the first-line imaging modality for suspected adnexal torsion, owing to its accessibility, real-time evaluation and cost-effectiveness (15,16). Gray-scale ultrasound can identify features suggestive of torsion, including asymmetric ovarian enlargement, stromal edema with peripheral follicle displacement, adnexal masses and free pelvic fluid, whereas color or power Doppler ultrasound can identify alterations in vascular flow patterns (1,17). Nevertheless, these indirect signs may be inconsistent, particularly in partial, intermittent, or early torsion, where Doppler flow abnormalities may be absent (10,14). Normal or preserved blood flow does not exclude torsion and may reflect residual arterial perfusion, dual ovarian blood supply, or transient detorsion (10,14). To overcome these limitations, the whirlpool sign has emerged as a specific ultrasonographic marker that directly visualizes the twisted vascular pedicle. The whirlpool sign is identified when the transducer exhibits coiled ovarian vessels, including the utero-ovarian and infundibulopelvic ligaments, arranged concentrically (14). These structures appear to spiral toward the affected adnexa (14). On color Doppler imaging, this appears as concentric circular or spiral vascular flow patterns, representing a direct indicator of torsion (14).
The present case report aimed to highlight the diagnostic value of the whirlpool sign in the timely identification of adnexal torsion associated with a mature ovarian teratoma, a challenging yet clinically significant emergency. By documenting the characteristic gray-scale and color Doppler features of the whirlpool sign, the authors aimed to raise awareness among obstetrician-gynecologists, radiologists and sonographers. Early recognition facilitates prompt surgical intervention, which can preserve ovarian function and fertility in reproductive-aged women. Furthermore, the present case report underscores the importance of meticulous scanning technique and focused evaluation of the adnexal pedicle during ultrasound examination in patients presenting with acute pelvic pain. Ultimately, the case described herein reinforces the whirlpool sign as a critical component of the pre-operative diagnostic framework for adnexal torsion and advocates for its routine assessment in suspected cases.
A 36-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 2) with a history of two cesarean sections and one spontaneous abortion presented to the Emergency Department of the ‘Elena Venizelou’ General and Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece several hours following the sudden onset of right lower abdominal pain, initially accompanied by nausea, both of which had resolved by the time of evaluation. Upon examination, the patient was found to be in a moderate general condition, cooperative, oriented and hemodynamically stable. Upon a physical examination, the lower abdomen was found to be soft with mild tenderness in the right lower quadrant. Uterine tone was normal, and no vaginal bleeding was observed. A bimanual gynecological examination revealed a large, tender mass palpable in the posterior pouch of Douglas.
A transvaginal ultrasonography of the right ovary, which measured 6.13x5.20 cm, identified two masses highly suggestive of mature cystic teratomas. The first mass, measuring 3.01x2.75 cm, exhibited hyperechoic foci indicative of fat and hair, whereas the second mass, measuring 3.12x2.45 cm, displayed a hyperechoic region with cystic components. Both findings were characteristic of two cystic teratomas. The left ovary appeared normal in size and echotexture (Fig. 1). The characteristic whirlpool sign was observed on the right, indicating torsion of the right adnexal vessels, thereby confirming the diagnosis of adnexal torsion (Fig. 2). Doppler flow was detected within the twisted vascular pedicle (Fig. 3). The examination of the liver, spleen, appendix and bowel did not reveal any notable findings, and no free fluid was noted in the pelvic cavity.
Laboratory test results were as follows: White blood cell count, 6.90 K/µl; hematocrit, 32.6%; hemoglobin level, 10.3 g/dl; platelet count, 239 K/µl; neutrophils, 66.4%; serum glucose, 94 mg/dl; urea, 9 mg/dl; creatinine, 0.5 mg/dl; and C-reactive protein, 0.04 mg/dl (reference range, 0-0.5 mg/dl). Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (14 IU/l), serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (11 IU/l) and serum electrolyte levels (potassium, 3.6 mmol/l; sodium, 137 mmol/l) were within normal reference ranges. A complete urinalysis did not reveal any notable findings.
Given the acute presentation, the patient underwent an emergency laparoscopy under general anesthesia. Intraoperatively, a 6-cm right ovarian cyst was found to be quadruply twisted around its vascular pedicle (Fig. 4). The right adnexa appeared hyperemic, edematous, and bluish-black in color. The left ovary was noted to be normal. A right salpingo-oophorectomy was performed, as the patient had completed her family and did not wish to preserve fertility. No intraoperative complications occurred. The patient was monitored in the hospital for 2 days and subsequently discharged in stable condition. No complications or recurrences were observed during outpatient follow-up. Post-operative pathological examination confirmed torsion of mature ovarian teratomas with hemorrhagic necrosis.
Mature teratomas, commonly referred to as dermoid cysts, are among the most frequently encountered benign ovarian tumors and are bilateral in ~10-15% of cases (18). These lesions originate from totipotent germ cells and characteristically can contain tissues derived from all three embryonic germ layers (18). Their contents typically include sebaceous material and hair, while the cyst wall is partially lined by keratinized squamous epithelium containing hair follicles and sebaceous glands (18). Additional well-differentiated tissues, including teeth, bone, cartilage, thyroid tissue and respiratory-type epithelium, may be identified within these lesions (18). They have fatty components, with or without associated calcifications (18). Mature teratomas occur predominantly in younger patients (18). In addition, multiple synchronous ovarian teratomas may occur within the same ovary (18). The predisposition of ovarian teratomas to torsion is largely attributed to their size, weight and relative mobility within the adnexa (5,11). In particular, the presence of a large adnexal mass with heterogeneous internal contents, as is often the case with ovarian teratomas, increases the volume and mobility of the mass, thereby facilitating its rotation around its pedicle (5,11). This twisting may lead to sudden vascular compromise, resulting in acute, severe pain and often necessitating urgent surgical intervention (19). The spontaneous rupture of ovarian teratomas has been reported in ~3-7% of cases (18). Malignant transformation occurs in a small proportion of patients, with an estimated incidence of ~1.8% (18). Ovarian teratomas exhibit distinctive ultrasonographic features, most notably a markedly hyperechoic ovarian mass or a hyperechoic mural nodule, commonly referred to as a dermoid plug (20). Additional sonographic findings may include areas of calcification and fat-fluid levels, which together contribute to their characteristic imaging appearance (20). In the patient described herein, ultrasonographic findings revealed two ovarian masses highly characteristic of mature cystic teratomas within the right ovary measuring 6.13x5.20 cm. The first mass (3.01x2.75 cm) demonstrated hyperechoic foci consistent with fat and hair, while the second mass (3.12x2.45 cm) exhibited a hyperechoic area with cystic components. Both appearances are classic features of benign, complex germ cell tumors that often contain various tissues, such as hair and fat.
Ovarian torsion is defined as partial or complete rotation of the ovarian vascular pedicle around the ligamentous support structures, the infundibulopelvic and utero-ovarian ligaments (21). This rotation initially compromises venous and lymphatic outflow, leading to ovarian congestion and stromal edema (10). In more advanced cases, it may subsequently impair arterial inflow (10). If unrecognized or untreated, these vascular disturbances can progress to ischemia, infarction, and loss of ovarian viability (10). Ovarian torsion most frequently occurs in the presence of an adnexal mass, which increases the torque applied to the vascular pedicle and serves as a mechanical fulcrum for rotation on its supporting ligaments (22). Larger masses are particularly associated with this risk, amplifying the likelihood and severity of torsion (23). The clinical presentation of adnexal torsion is most commonly characterized by sudden-onset pelvic pain accompanied by nausea and vomiting. However, these features are non-specific and overlap with those of other acute conditions, such as appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease and non-torsed adnexal masses. Therefore, both transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography are routinely employed for diagnostic evaluation (23,24). Ultrasonographic findings suggestive of adnexal torsion include ovarian enlargement with stromal edema and peripheral displacement of follicles, as well as the presence of free pelvic fluid. An associated adnexal mass further supports the diagnosis, particularly when it is >5 cm in diameter and appears heterogeneous or demonstrates complex internal architecture, such as the ovarian teratomas (1,17). Color Doppler interrogation may show absent or reduced ovarian blood flow; however, this finding is not definitive, as preserved flow may be present due to the dual arterial supply of the ovary or in cases of partial or intermittent torsion (25). Consequently, early imaging guided by clinical suspicion is essential, and the identification of a large adnexal mass, particularly a mature cystic teratoma, should further heighten concern for ovarian torsion (10). Among the ultrasonographic indicators of ovarian torsion, the whirlpool sign is regarded as the most specific (26). This sign reflects the direct visualization of a twisted ovarian vascular pedicle comprising the ovarian artery and vein, appearing as a coiled or spiral structure on both gray-scale and color Doppler imaging. It has been observed in up to 90.8% of cases (11,26). In the case presented herein, a detailed ultrasonographic examination provided clear visualization of the whirlpool sign, observed as a twisted vascular pedicle adjacent to the thickened fallopian tube and the enlarged right ovary containing two mature cystic teratomas. This finding was critical in establishing the diagnosis of adnexal torsion pre-operatively, highlighting the increased torsion risk associated with multiple teratomas in a single ovary. The clear depiction of the twisted pedicle on both gray-scale and color Doppler imaging underscored the urgency of surgical intervention. The accurate identification of this sign requires careful tracing along the anticipated course of the vascular pedicle and precise transducer positioning (27). Subtle probe adjustments are also necessary to clearly delineate the twisted configuration (27). The meta-analysis by Adu-Bredi et al (28) reported that the whirlpool sign has a diagnostic sensitivity of 82% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.86] and a specificity of 81% (95% CI, 0.70-0.90), with a positive predictive value of 93.6% and a negative predictive value of 43.8%. Despite its high diagnostic value, the visualization of the whirlpool sign can be technically difficult and is highly dependent on sonographer expertise and familiarity with pelvic vascular anatomy (14). It also requires optimal transducer angulation and often a transvaginal approach to maximize spatial resolution (14). Although systematic scanning techniques that trace the vascular pedicle may improve detection rates, even experienced practitioners may fail to visualize the sign in some cases. Patient-related factors, such as body habitus and ovarian position, may further limit detection. Accordingly, standardized scanning protocols and focused training in acute gynecological ultrasound are essential. Notably, the absence of the whirlpool sign does not exclude torsion, particularly in early, partial, or intermittent cases. Imaging findings should always be interpreted in conjunction with clinical suspicion, as torsion remains a clinical diagnosis supported by imaging rather than defined by it alone. Absent ovarian Doppler flow is highly suggestive of adnexal torsion (29). However, relying on Doppler findings alone may be misleading, as arterial perfusion can persist via collateral circulation, and normal flow does not reliably exclude torsion (16,25). Therefore, a combined morphological and flow-based assessment is recommended (16,25). A standardized ultrasonographic protocol for tracing the adnexal vascular pedicle may help reduce operator dependency and improve the detection of the whirlpool sign, particularly among less experienced sonographers. The following stepwise approach can be incorporated into routine pelvic ultrasonography: The process should first begin with the systematic identification of the uterus and both ovaries using transvaginal ultrasonography, as this approach provides superior spatial resolution (10,30). Once the affected ovary is identified, typically enlarged and often associated with a mass, color or power Doppler with low velocity settings should be activated to optimize detection of slow venous flow (31,32). Subsequently, the utero-ovarian ligament should be located medially by placing the probe in the sagittal plane at the uterine cornu and gently sweeping laterally toward the ovary. This should be followed by the identification of the infundibulopelvic ligament laterally, near the pelvic sidewall, where the ovarian vessels originate. The vascular pedicle lies between these two landmarks (14,33). Using slow, deliberate probe movements (rocking, tilting and rotation), the vessels should be traced continuously from the uterus toward the adnexa, maintaining visualization of the vascular pathway rather than jumping between structures. If the pedicle is not immediately visualized, switching between transverse and oblique planes would be required, as the twisted configuration may only become apparent in specific angles (26,33). When a suspicious coiled structure is identified, color Doppler should be applied to confirm concentric or spiral flow, characteristic of the whirlpool sign (26,31). Gentle graded compression may help displace bowel loops and improve visualization (34). Finally, bilateral comparison should be performed and cine loops should be documented to capture dynamic vascular patterns. This structured tracing technique, emphasizing anatomical landmarks, continuous vessel tracking and multiplanar assessment, has been shown to improve diagnostic confidence and may increase the detection rates of adnexal torsion (14,24,26,27).
In younger patients and those desiring future fertility, the pre-operative identification of the whirlpool sign has critical implications for surgical decision-making, particularly in supporting a conservative approach with detorsion rather than oophorectomy. Visualization of the whirlpool sign confirms the presence of adnexal torsion at an early stage, often before irreversible ischemic damage has occurred (26,27,31). This early and specific diagnosis facilitates prompt surgical intervention, which is a critical determinant of ovarian salvage (30,35). Of note, multiple studies have demonstrated that even ovaries with a grossly ischemic or cyanotic appearance at laparoscopy may regain function following detorsion, supporting a paradigm shift toward ovarian conservation whenever feasible (36-38). In this context, the whirlpool sign serves as a direct imaging marker of mechanical torsion rather than tissue nonviability, thereby reinforcing the rationale for detorsion as the initial surgical step in women of reproductive age (32). Furthermore, its identification may reduce diagnostic uncertainty and avoid delays that could otherwise lead to infarction and necessitate oophorectomy (14). While the definitive intraoperative assessment of ovarian viability remains essential, the pre-operative detection of the whirlpool sign contributes to surgical planning, patient counseling and the prioritization of fertility-preserving strategies. Consequently, incorporating systematic evaluation for the whirlpool sign into ultrasound protocols may increase the likelihood of conservative management and improve reproductive outcomes in appropriate patients (35,37,39).
Recent advances in ultrasonographic technology, including three-dimensional (3D) volumetric imaging and advanced Doppler techniques, may help overcome several of the technical limitations associated with visualization of the whirlpool sign. Conventional two-dimensional ultrasonography is inherently operator-dependent and may fail to capture the complex spatial configuration of a twisted vascular pedicle, particularly when its orientation is oblique or obscured by adjacent structures. By contrast, 3D volumetric imaging enables the acquisition of a complete dataset of the adnexal region, allowing multi-planar reconstruction and post-processing analysis. This facilitates improved visualization of the spatial relationship between the ovary, fallopian tube and vascular pedicle, potentially enhancing the detection of the spiral configuration characteristic of torsion (13,40,41). Additionally, 3D power Doppler can provide a more comprehensive depiction of vascular architecture and flow distribution, even in low-flow states, thereby increasing sensitivity in early or partial torsion and enabling objective assessment of reperfusion following detorsion (40,42). Advanced Doppler modalities further improve diagnostic performance by addressing the limitations of conventional color Doppler. Research has demonstrated that abnormalities in ovarian venous flow may be detected even when arterial flow is preserved, highlighting the importance of sensitive Doppler techniques in early torsion (43). Moreover, combined gray-scale and Doppler assessment allows the stratification of torsion severity and may assist in predicting ovarian viability (42,17). These techniques may reduce false-negative findings in cases with preserved arterial flow by better characterizing venous congestion and microvascular compromise, which are early pathophysiologic events. Despite these advantages, current evidence suggests that ultrasound performance remains variable and dependent on technique, reinforcing the need for multimodal optimization and operator training (14,44). Although advanced technologies, such as high-definition flow and microvascular imaging are not yet universally available in emergency settings, they hold significant promise for improving diagnostic confidence, particularly in technically challenging or equivocal cases. Future prospective studies are required to validate their clinical utility and to establish standardized protocols for integrating 3D volumetric Doppler reconstruction and superb microvascular imaging into routine evaluation of suspected adnexal torsion (45-48). When ultrasonographic findings are atypical or inconclusive, adjunct cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide additional diagnostic information. A CT scan can demonstrate twisted vascular pedicles, adnexal displacement and secondary signs of ischemia, while an MRI provides superior soft-tissue contrast for delineating the twisted pedicle and associated features (49-57). However, these modalities should be regarded as complementary to, rather than replacements for, ultrasonography in the evaluation of suspected ovarian torsion (10). A comparison of the roles of ultrasonography, CT and MRI in cases of suspected ovarian torsion is presented in Table I.
In summary, the occurrence of two or more mature cystic teratomas within a single ovary is exceedingly rare and presents unique diagnostic and clinical considerations (18,58). However, the presence of multiple or complex masses increases the overall volume and mobility of the ovary, significantly raising the risk of torsion due to enhanced rotational potential around the vascular pedicle (59,60). In addition, ovarian torsion is more likely to occur with benign ovarian tumors, particularly cystic masses such as teratomas (61). The identification of a definitive whirlpool sign on ultrasonography should prompt urgent gynecological consultation and consideration for laparoscopy, which remains the gold standard for both definitive diagnosis and management. Timely surgical intervention is strongly associated with improved rates of ovarian salvage. Clinicians and sonographers need to maintain a high index of suspicion in such cases, as prompt diagnosis and timely intervention are essential to prevent irreversible ischemic damage and to preserve ovarian function, particularly in women desiring future fertility. Published surgical series indicate that ovarian salvage is highly time-dependent, with preservation rates >90% when detorsion is performed early following symptom onset, and declining substantially with diagnostic and therapeutic delay due to progressive ischemia and hemorrhagic infarction. In cases with prolonged torsion, salvage rates may decrease by almost half, reflecting the development of irreversible necrosis (30,33). Notably, evidence from pediatric and reproductive-age populations demonstrates that the intraoperative macroscopic appearance of the ovary is an unreliable indicator of viability (62-66). Even ovaries that appear dark, cyanotic, or necrotic at the time of surgery frequently recover function following detorsion, with reported recovery rates approaching 80-90% (62-66). Together, these findings underscore the importance of early intervention, while strongly supporting a conservative, ovary-sparing surgical approach whenever feasible, particularly in patients with future fertility considerations. Looking forward, the broader adoption of high-resolution ultrasonography, advanced Doppler techniques and three-dimensional volumetric imaging may further enhance visualization of twisted vascular pedicles. In parallel, large-scale prospective studies focusing specifically on teratoma-associated torsion and the whirlpool sign are warranted to refine imaging protocols and optimize clinical pathways for this time-sensitive gynecologic emergency.
In conclusion, the ultrasonographic whirlpool sign is a highly specific and clinically valuable marker for ovarian torsion, particularly in cases with multiple mature cystic teratomas within a single ovary. The clear identification of the whirlpool sign enables a rapid pre-operative diagnosis, guiding timely surgical intervention and minimizing ischemic injury. Although detection can be influenced by operator expertise and patient factors, focused assessment of the adnexal vascular pedicle during routine ultrasonography for acute pelvic pain significantly improves diagnostic accuracy. The early recognition of the whirlpool sign is essential for optimizing patient outcomes, preserving ovarian function, particularly in women seeking fertility preservation and reducing morbidity.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
MV conceptualized and supervised the study, interpreted the findings, and critically revised and reviewed the manuscript. FNV was involved in the study design, literature review, writing of the manuscript, preparation of the original draft, and table processing. VKV contributed to the study design, literature review, and manuscript writing. MV, AF, ES and OT contributed to the clinical management of the patient, assisted with data acquisition, and participated in the literature review and manuscript preparation. MV, AF, ES and OT confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval of this report were not required due to the retrospective nature of the report. The patient's information has been de-identified. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient for inclusion the present case report.
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish the study and any related images. Additionally, the patient's information has been de-identified.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
During the preparation of this work, AI tools were used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript or to generate images, and subsequently, the authors revised and edited the content produced by the AI tools as necessary, taking full responsibility for the ultimate content of the present manuscript.
|
Varras M, Tsikini A, Polyzos D, Samara Ch, Hadjopoulos G and Akrivis Ch: Uterine adnexal torsion: Pathologic and gray-scale ultrasonographic findings. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecolo. 31:34–38. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Antoniou N, Varras M, Akrivis C, Kitsiou E, Stefanaki S and Salamalekis E: Isolated torsion of the fallopian tube: A case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 31:235–238. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Varras M, Akrivis Ch, Polyzos D, Frakala S and Samara Ch: A voluminous twisted paraovarian cyst in a 74-year-old patient: case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 30:253–256. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fukui H, Tsuboyama T, Onishi H, Otai T, Nakamoto A, Hondai T, Kiso K, Matsumoto S, Kaketaka K, Tanigaki T, et al: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of adnexal and leiomyoma torsion: Correlation with laparoscopic findings. Jpn J Radiol. 44:242–264. 2026.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cong L, Wang S, Yeung SY, Lee JHS, Chung JPW and Chan DYL: Mature cystic teratoma: An integrated review. Int J Mol Sci. 24(6141)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Choi SH, Jeon HJ, Gil B, Won S, Lee N, Shim S, Kim MK, Jung YW, Seong SJ and Kim ML: Age-specific characteristics and malignancy risk of ovarian teratomas: A retrospective single-centre study. J Clin Med. 14(5872)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Balci O, Energin H, Görkemli H and Acar A: Management of adnexal torsion: A 13-year experience in single tertiary center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 29:293–297. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Verma M, Bhuria V, Chauhan M, Nanda S, Dahiya P and Singhal SR: Adnexal torsion: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary care teaching hospital in Northern India. Cureus. 13(e17792)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Di Serafino M, Iacobellis F, Schillirò ML, Verde F, Grimaldi D, Dell'Aversano Orabona G, Caruso M, Sabatino V, Rinaldo C, Cantisani V, et al: Pelvic pain in reproductive age: US findings. Diagnostics (Basel). 12(939)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chang-Patel EJ, Palacios-Helgeson LK and Gould CH: Adnexal torsion: A review of diagnosis and management strategies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 34:196–203. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bailey F, Moore G, De A and Holland T: Ovarian torsion: A modern approach to management. TOG. 7:221–230. 2025. | |
|
Varras M, Tsikini A, Polyzos D, Samara Ch and Akrivis Ch: Internal hemorrhage caused by a twisted malignant ovarian dysgerminoma: Ultrasonographic findings of a rare case and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 31:73–78. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dawood MT, Naik M, Bharwani N, Sudderuddin SA, Rockall AG and Stewart VR: Adnexal torsion: Review of radiologic appearances. Radiographics. 41:609–624. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Garde I, Paredes C, Ventura L, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Vara J, Linares M and Alcázar JL: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound signs for detecting adnexal torsion: systemic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 61:310–324. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ghulmiyyah L, Nassar A, Sassine D, Khoury S, Nassof J, Ramadan H, Najem E and Berjawi G: Accuracy of pelvic ultrasound in diagnosing adnexal torsion. Radiol Res Pract. 2019(1406291)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wattar B, Rimmer M, Rogozinska E, Macmillian M, Khan KS and Wattar BH: Accuracy of imaging modalities for adnexal torsion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 128:37–44. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Auslender R, Shen O, Kaufman Y, Goldberg Y, Bardicef M, Lissak A and Lavie O: Doppler and gray-scale sonographic classification of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 3:208–211. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bournas N, Varras M, Kassanos D, Chrelias Ch, Tzaida O and Salamalekis E: Multiple dermoid cysts within the same ovary: Our experience of a rare case with review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 31:305–308. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmed A and Lotfollahzadeh S: Cystic teratoma. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Teasure Island, FL, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564325/?utm_source=chatgpt.com. | |
|
Varras M: Benefits and limitations of ultrasonographic evaluation of uterine adnexal lesions in early detection of ovarian cancer. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 31:85–98. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baron SL and Mathai JK: Ovarian torsion. StatPearls Publishing;, Treasure Island, FL, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560675/. | |
|
Huang C, Hong MK and Ding DC: A review of ovary torsion. Tzu Chi Med J. 29:143–147. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rostamzadeh A, Mirfendereski S, Rezaie MJ and Rezai S: Diagnostic efficacy of sonography for diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Pak J Med Sci. 30:413–416. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Moro F, Bolomini G, Sibal M, Vijayaraghavan SB, Venkatesh P, Nardelli F, Pasciuto T, Mascilini F, Pozzati F, Leone FPG, et al: Imaging in gynecological disease (20): Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 56:934–943. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lourenco AP, Swenson D, Tubbs RJ and Lazarus E: Ovarian and tubal torsion: Imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI. Emerg Radiol. 21:179–187. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Vijayaraghavan SB: Sonographic whirlpool sign in ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med. 23:1643–1649. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Higashide R, Saito K, Hashido N, Ishikawa T and Miyasaka N: Step-by-step instructions for detecting whirlpool sign in adnexal torsion. J Rural Med. 18:189–193. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Adu-Bredi TK, Arkorful J, Appiah-Denkyira K and Wiafe YA: Diagnostic value of the sonographic whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Ultrasound. 49:746–753. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Higashide R, Tsukada T, Ichikawa M, Sakamoto M and Shimabukuro K: Ovarian torsion due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome diagnosed by sonographic whirlpool sign in the first trimester of pregnancy: A case report. Radiol Case Rep. 18:3386–3389. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Huchon C and Fauconnier A: Adnexal torsion: A literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 150:8–12. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lee EJ, Kwon HC, Joo HJ, Suh JH and Fleischer AC: Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with Doppler ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 17:83–89. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mashiach R, Melamed N, Gilad N, Ben-Shitrit G and Meizner I: Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: Accuracy and predictive factors. J Ultrasound Med. 30:1205–1210. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chang HC, Bhatt S and Dogra VS: Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics. 28:1355–1368. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rossi BV, Ference EH, Zurakowski D, Scholz S, Feins NR, Chow JS and Laufer MR: The clinical presentation and surgical management of adnexal torsion in the pediatric and adolescent population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 25:109–113. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Anders JF and Powell E: Urgency of evaluation and outcome of acute ovarian torsion in pediatric patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 159:532–535. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Oelsner G, Cohen SB, Soriano D, Admon D, Mashiach S and Carp H: Minimal surgery for the twisted ischaemic adnexa can preserve ovarian function. Hum Reprod. 18:2599–2602. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
White M and Stella J: Ovarian torsion: 10-year perspective. Emerg Med Australas. 17:231–237. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mandelbaum RS, Smith MB, Violette CJ, Matsuzaki S, Matsushima K, Klar M, Roman LD, Paulson RJ and Matsuo K: Conservative surgery for ovarian torsion in young women: Perioperative complications and national trends. BJOG. 127:957–965. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Valsky DV, Esh-Broder E, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M and Yagel S: Added value of the gray-scale whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 36:630–634. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kupesic S and Plavsic BM: Adnexal torsion: Color Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 35:602–606. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu Q, Song Z, Liu S, Dong Z, Zheng X, Leung TY and Chen X: 3D visualization of uterus and ovary: Tissue clearing techniques and biomedical applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 13(1610539)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zanforlin Filho SM, Araujo Júnior E, Serafini P, Guimarães Filho HA, Pires CR, Nardozza LM and Moron AF: Diagnosis of ovarian torsion by three-dimensional power Doppler in first trimester of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 34:266–270. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Nizar K, Deutsch M, Filmer S, Weizman B, Bellosesky R and Weiner Z: Doppler studies of the ovarian venous blood flow in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. J Clin Ultrasound. 37:436–439. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Aziz MU, Eisenbrey JR, Deganello A, Zahid M, Sharbidre K, Sidhu P and Robbin ML: Microvascular flow imaging: A state-of-the-art review of clinical use and promise. Radiology. 305:250–264. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Trinci M, Danti G, Di Maurizio M, Tursini S, Briganti V, Galluzzo M and Miele V: Can contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) be useful in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion in pediatric females? A preliminary monocentric experience. J Ultrasound. 24:505–514. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fijean AL, Manhertz D, Massicot L, Lecointre L, Mottet N, Raimond E, Simon E, Gabriele V, Morel O, Beaumont M, et al: Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of adnexal torsion (COVARIAN): Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 16(e110352)2026.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Özhan Oktar S, Cerit MN, Şendur HN and Karabörk Kılıç AC: Recent advances in vascular ultrasound imaging technology and their clinical implications. Diagn Interv Radiol. 32:47–56. 2026.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li M, Chen L, Yan J, Jayasena CN, Liu Z, Li J, Li A, Zhu J, Wang R, Li J, et al: Super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy for the non-invasive imaging of human testicular microcirculation and its differential diagnosis role in male infertility. View. 5(20230093)2024. | |
|
Duigenan S, Oliva E and Lee SI: Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198:W122–W131. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singh T, Prabhakar N, Singla V, Bagga R and Khandelwal N: Spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings in ovarian torsion. Pol J Radiol. 83:e588–e599. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wolfe C, Halsey-Nichols M, Ritter K and McCoin N: Abdominal pain in the emergency department: How to select the correct imaging for diagnosis. Open Access Emerg Med. 14:335–345. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gomes MM, Cavalcanti LS, Reis RL, Silva EJDCE, Dutra JB and de Melo-Leite AF: Twist and shout: Magnetic resonance imaging findings in ovarian torsion. Radiol Bras. 52:397–402. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Jung JI, Choi BG, Kim BS, Kim H and Lee JM: CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics. 22:283–294. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kimura I, Togashi K, Kawakami S, Takakura K, Mori T and Konishi J: Ovarian torsion: CT and MR imaging appearances. Radiology. 190:337–341. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Petkovska I, Duke E, Martin DR, Irani Z, Geffre CP, Cragun JM, Costello JR, Arif-Tiwari H, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Udayasankar U and Kalb B: MRI of ovarian torsion: Correlation of imaging features with the presence of perifollicular hemorrhage and ovarian viability. Eur J Radiol. 85:2064–2071. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Harringa JB, Bracken RL, Markhardt BK, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lubner M, Chiu A, Birstler J, Pickhartdt PJ, Reeer SB and Repplinger MD: Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of female pelvic pathology. Emerg Radiol. 28:789–796. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shukla R, Nash Z and Owens OJ: Ovarian torsion-diagnostic features on imaging. Clin Radiol. 70 (S1)(S4)2015. | |
|
Fayerz I, Khreisat B, Athamneh T, Omoosh R and Daibes MA: Multiple bilateral ovarian mature cystic teratomas with ovarian torsion: A case report. Oman Med J. 33:163–166. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lugata J, Lyamuya T, Nombi L, Maro E, Mchome B and Mremi A: Ovarian torsion of a large mature cystic teratoma complicating early pregnancy: A rare case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 138:245–249. 2026.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shams F, Ahmed S, Habib M and Anjum AS: Endometrioma coexisting with mature cystic teratoma in a single ovary: A rare presentation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 36:447–450. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Toba N, Takahashi T, Ota K, Takanashi A, Iizawa Y, Endo Y, Furukawa S, Soeda S, Watanabe T, Mizunuma H, et al: Malignant transformation arising from mature cystic teratoma of the ovary presenting as ovarian torsion: A case report and literature review. Fukushima J Med Sci. 66:44–52. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Oelsner G and Shashar D: Adnexal torsion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 49:459–463. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Spinelli C, Piscioneri J and Strambi S: Adnexal torsion in adolescents: Update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 27:320–325. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dasgupta R, Renaud E, Goldin AB, Baird R, Cameron DB, Arnold MA, Diefanbach KA, Gosain A, Grabowski J, Guner YS, et al: Ovarian torsion in pediatric and adolescent patients: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 53:1387–1391. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Geimamaite L and Trainavičius K: Ovarian torsion in children: Management and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 48:1946–1953. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Santos XM, Cass DL and Dietrich JE: Outcome following detorsion of torsed adnexa in children. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 28:136–138. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |