Phase I study of docetaxel plus S-1 combination chemotherapy for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Japan, and other countries. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has shown that platinum-based chemotherapy prolongs survival time in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (1). However, the majority of patients with advanced NSCLC progress or relapse after receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. While advanced NSCLC has a poor prognosis, second-line chemotherapy remains a key component in the clinical management of NSCLC patients.

Docetaxel (DTX) is a taxane originally extracted from the needles of the European yew tree Taxus baccata. DTX exerts its antitumor activity through the acceleration of microtubule assembly from tubulin subunits and the inhibition of microtubule depolymerization. DTX has been shown to improve the survival and quality of life in patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based therapy compared to best supportive care (2). DTX is used as standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in a similar manner as other agents, such as pemetrexed and erlotinib.

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine comprising tegafur, 5-chloro- 2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate (OXO) (3). Tegafur is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). CDHP increases 5-FU concentration in serum and tumor tissue by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). OXO is included in S-1 in order to reduce tegafur-associated gastrointestinal toxicity (4). 5-FU is not effective for lung cancer, as NSCLC tissue generally has high DPD activity (5). By contrast, S-1 showed antitumor activity in NSCLC. In a phase II study, S-1 monotherapy resulted in a 22% response rate in patients with advanced chemotherapy-naïve NSCLC, with a median survival time of 10.2 months (6).

DTX and S-1 possess different antitumor mechanisms, and a synergistic effect between the two agents was demonstrated in human breast cancer xenograft models (7). Furthermore, phase I/II studies in advanced gastric cancer showed that this combination was active and well tolerated (8,9).

To further improve the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC, this phase I study was designed in order to evaluate DTX plus S-1 combination therapy.

Patients and methods

Eligibility

Patients with recurrent NSCLC were eligible for this study. The study was initiated following approval from the institutional review board. The inclusion criteria were: i) histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, ii) measurable or evaluable lesions, iii) prior administration of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without second-line gefitinib, and iv) an interval of at least 4 weeks following the last administration of prior chemotherapy. Patient characteristics included: i) age 20–74 years, ii) an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, iii) adequate hematopoietic function (white blood cells, ≥4,000/mm3; neutrocytes, ≥2,000/mm3; platelets, ≥10×104/mm3 and hemoglobin, ≥9.5 g/dl), iv) adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dl and transaminase ≤2 times institutional normal upper limit), v) serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dl, vi) adequate pulmonary function (PaO2 >60 Torr or SpO2 >90%), vii) adequate cardiac function without treatment, viii) anticipated survival ≥12 weeks, and ix) written informed consent prior to treatment. Exclusion criteria were: i) massive plural effusion or pericardial effusion, ii) superior vena cava syndrome, iii) serious concomitant systemic disorders, including active infection, uncontrollable diabetes mellitus, hypertension, uncontrollable angina, severe heart failure, active ulcer or another primary malignancy, iv) active interstitial pneumonia, v) coagulation system disorder, vi) history of drug allergy, including allergy to polysorbate 80, vii) pregnancy or breastfeeding, and viii) other concomitant anticancer drug administration, including flucytosine.

Treatment schedule and assessment

The patients received variable doses of DTX administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1 and S-1 administered orally on days 1–14 every 3 weeks. The dose-escalation levels of the two agents are shown in Table I. The starting dose of DTX (dose level 1) was 40 mg/m2. Subsequent dose levels were 50 mg/m2 (dose level 2) and 60 mg/m2 (dose levels 3 and 4). The starting dose of S-1 (dose levels 1–3) was 65 mg/m2, administered according to body surface area (BSA): BSA <1.25 m2, 50 mg/day; BSA ≥1.25 to <1.50 m2, 80 mg/day; BSA ≥1.50 m2, 100 mg/day). Subsequent dose levels were 85 mg/m2 (dose level 4), administered according to BSA: BSA <1.25 m2, 80 mg/day; BSA ≥1.25 to <1.50 m2, 100 mg/day; and BSA ≥1.50 m2, 120 mg/day).

Table I Dose escalation of the two agents.

Table I

Dose escalation of the two agents.

Level	Docetaxel (mg/m2)	S-1 (mg/m2)
1	40	65
2	50	65
3	60	65
4	60	80

Toxicity was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), version 2.0. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: i) grade 4 neutropenia during administration of S-1 or lasting longer than 4 days following S-1 administration, ii) grade 3 neutropenia with fever, iii) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, iv) grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicity other than nausea, vomiting or fatigue, or v) delay of second cycle within 2 weeks. DLT was determined during the first treatment cycle. At least 3 patients at each dose level were enrolled; the criteria were: i) the dose was defined as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) when all 3 patients developed DLT; ii) when 1–2 of 3 patients developed a DLT, 3 additional patients were enrolled; iii) when >3 of 6 patients developed a DLT, the dose was defined as the MTD; and iv) when <2 of 6 patients developed a DLT, the dose was increased to the following level. The recommended dose (RD) for the phase II study was defined as the dose preceding the MTD. Treatment continued unless the disease progressed, unacceptable toxicity occurred or the patient refused further treatment. The response to treatment was assessed according to the WHO criteria [response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)].

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 17 patients were enrolled. Patient characteristics are shown in Table II. The median age at entry was 61 years (range 50–72). A total of 13 patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 and 4 patients had a PS of 1. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma. All of the patients had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and 4 patients had also received gefitinib.

Table II Patient characteristics (n=17).

Table II

Patient characteristics (n=17).

Characteristics	No.
Age (years)
Median (range)	61 (50–72)
Gender
Male/Female	12/5
PS (ECOG)
0/1	13/4
Histology
Ad/Sq/La/unclassified	10/3/3/1
Prior chemotherapy
CBDCA + PTX	13
CDDP + VNR	3
CBDCA + VP-16	1
Gefitinib (additional)	4

[i] Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG; PS, performance status; Ad, adenocarcinoma; Sq, squamous cell carcinoma; La, large cell carcinoma; CBDCA, carboplatin; PTX, paclitaxel; CDDP, cisplatin; VNR, vinorelbine.

Dose escalation and determination of the maximum tolerated and recommended doses

A total of 3 patients were enrolled at dose levels 1 and 2 and completed the first cycle without DLTs. A total of 6 patients were enrolled at dose level 3, since 1 of the first 3 patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 oral mucositis occurred in 1 of the 3 added patients at dose level 3; thus, 4 of 6 patients experienced no DLTs, allowing progression to dose level 4. At dose level 4, 3 of 5 patients developed grade 4 neutropenia. The MTD was therefore defined as dose level 4, and dose level 3 was selected as the RD.

Toxicities and response to therapy

Hematological and non-hematological toxicities observed during the first cycle are shown in Tables III and IV. All the toxicities were mild. No grade 3/4 anemia or thrombocytopenia was observed in this study. With respect to non-hematological toxicity, grade 2 diarrhea and appetite loss were observed at dose level 3.

Table III Hematological toxicity.

Table III

Hematological toxicity.

NCI-CTC grade	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Level 4
	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
Leukopenia	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	3	1	0	0	2	3	0
Neutropenia	1	0	1	0	1	1	1	0	0	1	2	1	0	1	1	3
Anemia	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	2	2	0	0	1	1	0	0
Thrombocytopenia	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Blood bilirubin increased	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Hypoalbuminemia	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0

[i] NCI-CTC, National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.

Table IV Non-hematological toxicity.

Table IV

Non-hematological toxicity.

NCI-CTC grade	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Level 4
	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
Fatigue	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
Appetite loss	1	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	2	0	0	0
Nausea	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Diarrhea	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	1	0	0	0
Hiccup	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Mucositis	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Alopecia	1	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0
Hypersensitivity	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Muscle pain	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Arthlargia	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Skin pigmentation	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0

[i] NCI-CTC, National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.

The patients were able to be evaluated for response. A partial response was observed in 1 patient (5.9%), while stable disease was observed in 14 patients (82.4%) and progressive disease occurred in 2 patients (11.7%). Thus, the overall response rate was 5.9% (1 of 17 patients).

Discussion

In Japan, molecularly targeted therapies, such as gefitinib, erlotinib and bevacizumab, are used in the clinic and have gradually prolonged the survival of NSCLC patients. However, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Following first-line chemotherapy, the majority of patients with advanced NSCLC progress or relapse and their disease becomes resistant to the cytotoxic agents. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines published in 2003 (10), DTX is recommended as a second-line therapy for patients with recurrent NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based therapy. Currently, pemetrexed and erlotinib are also considered to be standard second-line therapies (11).

To improve the efficacy of chemotherapy for NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, certain studies have evaluated DTX-based combination therapy. DTX plus gemcitabine has been reported to yield a response rate of 7%, while DTX plus irinotecan results in a 10–20% response rate (12). However, no survival differences have been noted between combination chemotherapy and monotherapy in the second-line setting. In the present study, only 1 of 17 patients achieved a partial response, yielding a response rate of 5.9%. An additional 15 patients achieved stable disease.

Combination treatment with DTX and S-1 has been intensively investigated in gastric cancer. Studies have shown that no pharmacokinetic interactions occur between DTX and S-1 in patients with normal renal function. Impaired renal function often induces severe adverse reactions in patients treated with S-1, since elevated CDHP levels result in higher 5-FU concentrations (13). DTX and S-1 exhibit different antitumor mechanisms, and a synergistic effect between DTX and S-1 has been shown in human breast cancer xenograft models (7). Phase I/II studies in advanced gastric cancer showed that DTX and S-1 combination therapy is active and well tolerated (8,9). In the majority of studies, DTX is administered at 40 mg/m2. A few phase I/II studies have already been performed in relapsed NSCLC (14), in which an identical dosage of DTX was used. However, the present study identified a DTX dose of 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks as the RD, which is commonly used as standard monotherapy in Japan. Consequently, the RD of the present combination regimen appears to enhance the antitumor effects of S-1 when added to DTX monotherapy.

In the present study, the DLTs were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 mucositis. The major hematological toxicities were neutropenia and mild anemia, while the non-hematological toxicities were primarily gastrointestinal toxicities, including nausea, diarrhea and appetite loss. These toxicities were generally well tolerated.

Although other agents, such as EGFR-TKIs, are utilized depending on the EGFR mutation status, DTX monotherapy remains a crucial second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. Recent studies have shown that sequential or maintenance chemotherapy is useful as a second-line therapy for NSCLC patients who do not present with progressive disease (15). It is crucial to clarify the optimal duration and timing of second-line chemotherapy.

In conclusion, the present study has shown that the combination of DTX and S-1 may be useful and well tolerated as a second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC. Additional studies are required to confirm the objective response rate and survival benefit provided by this combination regimen at the RD determined in this study.

References