Modulation of microRNA expression in human lung cancer cells by the G9a histone methyltransferase inhibitor BIX01294
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 4, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2034
- Pages: 1819-1825
Abstract
Introduction
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortalities worldwide (1). Among all cases, ~80% are classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the remaining 20% are identified as SCLC. In addition to genetic lesions, including gene mutation, genomic insertion/deletion and translocation, erroneous epigenetic modifications are often involved in the development and progression of cancer (2). Silencing of tumor suppressor genes owing to aberrant promoter DNA methylation (3) and faulty activation of oncogenes caused by genomic DNA hypomethylation (4) are common in cancer cells. Additionally, overexpression of histone deacetylases (HDACs), which induce transcriptional silencing by catalyzing the removal of acetyl moieties from histones, represents another modality of epigenetic defect that contributes to cancer development (5,6). The use of small-molecule chemical agents to reactivate the expression of tumor suppressor genes or to repress oncogenes epigenetically has emerged as a promising approach to eradicate cancer. Accordingly, inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTi) and HDACs (HDACi) represent the two major classes of epigenetic antitumor agents.
In addition to protein coding genes, the expression of non-coding RNA transcripts, including microRNAs (miRNAs), is often dysregulated at the epigenetic level in cancer cells (7,8). miRNAs are small RNAs (~22 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression by binding to the 3′-untranslated regions of target gene transcripts to induce translational repression or transcript degradation. Depending on the biological function of the target gene products, miRNAs are involved in diverse biological processes, including cell proliferation and differentiation. With regard to cancer development, miRNAs were shown to exhibit oncogenic (9–11) and tumor suppressive (12–14) properties, respectively. Treatment of cancer cells with HDACi and DNMTi separately or in combination was shown to modulate miRNA expression (15–21), indicating the possibility of suppressing cancer cell growth and spread by targeting miRNA expression.
In addition to DNA methylation and histone acetylation, histone lysine methylation is involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression and represents another target of dysregulation. Depending on the position of the lysine residues to be methylated, histone methylation is involved in transcriptional activation and repression. Notably, the mono- and di-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me1 and H3K9me2) are associated with transcriptional repression in euchromatin (22). The enzyme responsible for H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 formation is G9a histone methyltransferase (23). G9a expression is upregulated in various types of human cancer (24,25), which indicates that the enzymatic activity is oncogenic. Consistent with this, the promoter regions of the aberrantly silenced tumor suppressor genes are marked by an increased level of H3K9me2 in cancer cells (26), and H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 are erased from the promoters of reactivated tumor suppressor genes (27). Additionally, the silencing of G9a expression by RNA interference reduces the invasiveness and metastatic potential of human lung cancer cells (28) and inhibits the growth of prostate cancer cells (29). These observations indicate a functional association between G9a activity and cancer development. Treatment of cells with BIX01294, a chemical inhibitor specific to G9a, results in a decline of the cellular H3K9me2 content (30). The reduction of proliferation, motility and invasiveness of human neuroblastoma cells following BIX01294 treatment (31) further indicates the use of this chemical as an antitumor agent. To examine whether specific miRNAs are involved in the tumor suppressive effect of G9a inhibition, a microarray analysis was performed in the current study to probe the global change in miRNA expression levels in human NSCLC H1299 cells following BIX01294 treatment.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The human NSCLC cells, H1299 (CRL-5803) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% non heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (ATCC) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Corning Inc., Acton, MA, USA). Four hours prior to drug treatment, 5×104 proliferating H1299 cells were seeded into each well of a 12-well culture plate. BIX01294 (Stemgent, Cambridge, MA, USA) was reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and diluted 10 times in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) immediately prior to use. The working BIX01294 solution was added directly to the culture medium to a final concentration of 4 μM. For the cells that were receiving the mock treatment, an equal volume of PBS-diluted DMSO was added. The cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 48 h prior to sample collection.
Total RNA extraction
H1299 cells were lysed in TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies). The total RNA fraction was harvested following a chloroform extraction and further purified using the Direct-Zol purification kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA). RNA quantity and quality were analyzed using a a NanoVue spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, Pittsburg, PA, USA) and Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively.
miRNA microarray analysis
A genome-wide miRNA expression profiling experiment was performed by LC Sciences (Houston, TX, USA). The probes for a total of 2,019 unique mature human miRNAs (Sanger miRBase Release 19.0; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK) were printed on the microarray in quadruplicate. Equal quantities of total RNA from three independent preparations of each sample group (mock versus BIX01294 treatment) were pooled for the miRNA microarray experiment. Fluorescent signals were background subtracted and normalized using the locally weighted scatterplot smoothing method. A two-tailed t-test (P<0.01 was identified to indicate a statistically significant difference) was performed to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of miRNAs
qPCR analysis of the expression level of individual miRNAs was performed according to instructions from Life Technologies (User bulletin no. 4465407, Jan 2013 version C) with minor modifications. Briefly, reverse transcription (RT) was conducted using the Taqman microRNA Reverse Transcription kit. In each reaction, 50 ng total RNA was reverse transcribed in the presence of 6 μl 100-fold diluted RT primer stock solution, 2 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 3.8 units of RNase inhibitor and 150 units of MultiScribe reverse transcriptase. The RT product was diluted five times in nuclease-free water. In each subsequent PCR reaction, 8 μl of the diluted RT product was used with 1× Taqman microRNA assay and 1× Taqman Universal Master Mix (Life Technologies). Triplicate measurements for each miRNA were performed, and the analysis was performed with the three independent preparations of total RNA samples harvested from each sample group. The expression level of individual miRNAs was normalized to that of small nucleolar RNA, RNU24, and the change in expression level was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. A two-tailed t-test (P<0.05 was identified to indicate a statistically significant difference) was performed to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs. All Taqman miRNA assays for mature human miRNAs and RNU24 were purchased from Life Technologies.
miRNA target prediction
Potential target genes of miRNAs were predicted using the miRNA Target Prediction and Functional Study Database (www.mirdb.org) (32,33). Enrichment analysis for disease-associated genes was performed using the WEB-based Gene Set Analysis Toolkit (http://bioinfo.vanderbilt.edu/webgestalt/) (34). The functional annotation of the genes was further inquired from the Gene References Into Functions (GeneRIFs) on the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. P<0.01 and P<0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference in miRNA microarray and qPCR analysis, respectively.
Results
G9a regulates the expression of miRNAs in human lung cancer cells
To examine whether G9a regulates the expression of miRNAs in human lung cancer cells, a microarray analysis was performed to study the change in the global miRNA expression pattern in H1299 cells in the presence and absence of BIX01294. Among the 2,019 mature human miRNAs scrutinized, only 51 of them were found to be differentially expressed (Table I). To identify the miRNAs that showed a robust change in expression level, the focus was on the miRNAs that exhibited a signal intensity of 500 units in at least one of the sample groups (35). Of the 51 differentially expressed miRNAs, 10 passed this selection criterion. Among the 10 miRNAs, six showed downregulation and the remaining four showed upregulation, following BIX01294 treatment.
Table IHuman miRNAs that showed a differential expression in H1299 cells following BIX01294 treatment through microarray analysis. |
Subsequently, a qPCR experiment was performed to validate the differential expression patterns of the 10 miRNAs. At the time of the experiment, the Taqman miRNA assay for one of the miRNAs (hsa-miR-1229-5p) was not available; therefore, it was excluded from the analysis. In addition, hsa-miR-3613-3p was found to be undetectable in the sample groups in qPCR analysis. The normalized and averaged expression levels of the remaining eight miRNAs are shown in Fig. 1. Two of the miRNAs, hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p, exhibited a significant reduction (40 and 33%, respectively) in expression level that is consistent with the result that was obtained from the microarray analysis.
Certain target genes of hsa-miR-151a-3p are associated with cancerous diseases
A search was conducted for the genes whose expression may be regulated by these two miRNAs. A total of 14 and 182 genes were predicted to be the targets of hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p, respectively (Table II). The small number of genes identified for hsa-miR-106b-3p precluded the performance of a robust prediction of the associated biological functions or disorders. A gene ontology analysis of the 182 genes that were potentially regulated by hsa-miR-151a-3p revealed that the most significantly associated biological process was the negative regulation of branching that is involved in ureteric bud morphogenesis. To examine if there is an association of human diseases with the predicted target genes, an enrichment analysis for disease-associated genes was performed. A total of 10 classes of disease (neoplasm metastasis, neoplastic processes, syndrome, adhesion, carcinoma, fasciculation, eye abnormalities, brain injuries, schizophrenia, optic nerve diseases) were found to be associated with the 182 genes. Among these diseases neoplasm metastasis, neoplastic processes, adhesion and carcinoma are relevant to cancer development and propagation. The genes associated with these four diseases are listed in Table III.
Table IIIPutative target genes of hsa-miR-151a-3p that are associated with diseases relevant to cancer. |
Discussion
The involvement in cell growth and susceptibility to epigenetic dysregulation highlights the role of miRNAs in cancer development. For this reason, these small RNA species may serve as potential therapeutic targets against cancer. The role of H3K9 methylation in the regulation of miRNA expression in human lung cancer cells has not been established. In the present study, it was found that the blockade of G9a activity, and thus histone H3K9 methylation, modulated the expression of miRNAs in the invasive H1299 lung cancer cell line. By interrogating the change in miRNA expression pattern with microarray analysis, it was found that only a particularly small portion of the human miRNA collection (51 out of 2,019; 2.5%) exhibited differential expression following BIX01294 treatment. This observation indicates that the regulatory activity of G9a may be specific towards a subset of miRNAs in these cells. Coupled with qPCR analysis, the two miRNAs that were identified, hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p, were downregulated in H1299 cells following BIX01294 treatment.
The biological function of hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p in lung cancer development has not been characterized. Based on their genomic location, hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p are known to reside in chromosome 7q22.1 and 8q24.3, respectively. The two genomic loci are frequently amplified in various cancers and the overexpression of the embedded genes has been shown to promote malignancy (36–40). Furthermore, the amplified and overexpressed functional non-coding RNA species participate in cancer development (41). Therefore, the downregulation of hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p expression by BIX01294 treatment may exert a tumor suppressive effect, presumably through the derepression of their target gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. The silencing of G9a expression inhibits the migration and invasion potential of lung cancer cells by enhancing the transactivation of expression of the cell adhesion molecule, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (28). It is likely that specific target genes of these miRNAs may encode adhesion molecules, which promote cell-cell adhesion and limit cell motility.
The target genes of hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p were searched for, and their biological activities and associated human diseases were identified. The small number of genes identified for hsa-miR-106b-3p precluded the performance of a robust prediction of their associated biological functions or human diseases. For hsa-miR-151a-3p, it was found that a subset of its target genes is involved in the cell adhesion process. Notably, certain genes (PCDHB7, PTPN12, CHL1, PPF1A1 and THBS1) encode cell adhesion or cell junction molecules that have been demonstrated or indicated to inhibit cell invasion (42–45). In addition, the genes exhibiting a similar function (TFAP2C, PCDHB13 and MNT) (46,47) are also target genes of hsa-miR-106b-3p. As a result, the inhibition of G9a activity by BIX01294 treatment may suppress metastasis by downregulating the expression level of miRNAs that block the translation of genes encoding the cell adhesion molecules. By contrast, another subset of the target genes of hsa-miR-151a-3p were identified, which are involved in neoplasm formation and metastasis; however, their involvement in the action of BIX01294 on H1299 cells remains unclear. The extent of derepression of the individual target genes may determine the overall cellular response to the downregulation of hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p. Alternatively, the biological effect of BIX01294 on H1299 cells may involve the interplay among these gene products.
The change in expression level of specific miRNAs upon inhibition of G9a activity strongly indicates a role for miRNAs in the mediation of the malignancy-promoting effect of G9a. Since mono- and di-methylation of H3K9 are involved in transcriptional silencing (22), a blockade of G9a activity, and thus H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 formation, is expected to reactivate the transcription of genes, including miRNAs. By contrast, the mechanism of downregulation of miRNA expression by G9a suppression remains unclear and requires further investigation.
In conclusion, the findings of the present study indicate that the suppression of G9a activity by BIX01294 treatment modulates the expression of specific miRNAs in H1299 cells. Further studies are required to establish the functional role, and prognostic and diagnostic potential of hsa-miR-106b-3p and hsa-miR-151a-3p in lung cancer development.
Acknowledgements
The authors are supported by the Intramural Research Program of Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, USA.
References
American Cancer Society. Lung Cancer (Non-Small Cell). http://www.cancer.org/cancer/lungcancer-non-smallcell/detaile-dguide/non-small-cell-lung-cancer-key-statistics. Accessed August 16, 2013 | |
Geutjes EJ, Bajpe PK and Bernards R: Targeting the epigenome for treatment of cancer. Oncogene. 31:3827–3844. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zöchbauer-Müller S, Fong KM, Virmani AK, Geradts J, Gazdar AF and Minna JD: Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res. 61:249–255. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hur K, Cejas P, Feliu J, et al: Hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) leads to activation of proto-oncogenes in human colorectal cancer metastasis. Gut. 63:635–646. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jung KH, Noh JH, Kim JK, et al: HDAC2 overexpression confers oncogenic potential to human lung cancer cells by deregulating expression of apoptosis and cell cycle proteins. J Cell Biochem. 113:2167–2177. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hayashi A, Horiuchi A, Kikuchi N, et al: Type-specific roles of histone deacetylase (HDAC) overexpression in ovarian carcinoma: HDAC1 enhances cell proliferation and HDAC3 stimulates cell migration with downregulation of E-cadherin. Int J Cancer. 127:1332–1346. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lujambio A and Esteller M: How epigenetics can explain human metastasis: a new role for microRNAs. Cell Cycle. 8:377–382. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baer C, Claus R and Plass C: Genome-wide epigenetic regulation of miRNAs in cancer. Cancer Res. 73:473–477. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, et al: A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature. 435:828–833. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song SJ, Ito K, Ala U, et al: The oncogenic microRNA miR-22 targets the TET2 tumor suppressor to promote hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and transformation. Cell Stem Cell. 13:87–101. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen P, Price C, Li Z, et al: miR-9 is an essential oncogenic microRNA specifically overexpressed in mixed lineage leukemia-rearranged leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:11511–11516. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, et al: Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 64:3753–3756. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, et al: miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:13944–13949. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu YY, Wu HJ, Ma HD, Xu LP, Huo Y and Yin LR: MicroRNA-503 suppresses proliferation and cell-cycle progression of endometrioid endometrial cancer by negatively regulating cyclin D1. FEBS J. 280:3768–3779. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rhodes LV, Nitschke AM, Segar HC, et al: The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A alters microRNA expression profiles in apoptosis-resistant breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 27:10–16. 2012. | |
Scott GK, Mattie MD, Berger CE, Benz SC and Benz CC: Rapid alteration of microRNA levels by histone deacetylase inhibition. Cancer Res. 66:1277–1281. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chatterjee N, Wang WL, Conklin T, Chittur S and Tenniswood M: Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulate miRNA and mRNA expression, block metaphase and induce apoptosis in inflammatory breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 14:658–671. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bandres E, Agirre X, Bitarte N, et al: Epigenetic regulation of microRNA expression in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 125:2737–2743. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saito Y, Liang G, Egger G, et al: Specific activation of microRNA-127 with downregulation of the proto-oncogene BCL6 by chromatin-modifying drugs in human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 9:435–443. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee EM, Shin S, Cha HJ, et al: Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) changes microRNA expression profiles in A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Int J Mol Med. 24:45–50. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Heller G, Weinzierl M, Noll C, et al: Genome-wide miRNA expression profiling identifies miR-9–3 and miR-193a as targets for DNA methylation in non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 18:1619–1629. 2012. | |
Rice JC, Briggs SD, Ueberheide B, et al: Histone methyltransferases direct different degrees of methylation to define distinct chromatin domains. Mol Cell. 12:1591–1598. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tachibana M, Sugimoto K, Nozaki M, et al: G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 16:1779–1791. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang J, Dorsey J, Chuikov S, et al: G9a and Glp methylate lysine 373 in the tumor suppressor p53. J Biol Chem. 285:9636–9641. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kondo Y, Shen L, Suzuki S, et al: Alterations of DNA methylation and histone modifications contribute to gene silencing in hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatol Res. 37:974–983. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nguyen CT, Weisenberger DJ, Velicescu M, et al: Histone H3-lysine 9 methylation is associated with aberrant gene silencing in cancer cells and is rapidly reversed by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res. 62:6456–6461. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
McGarvey KM, Fahrner JA, Greene E, Martens J, Jenuwein T and Baylin SB: Silenced tumor suppressor genes reactivated by DNA demethylation do not return to a fully euchromatic chromatin state. Cancer Res. 66:3541–3549. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen MW, Hua KT, Kao HJ, et al: H3K9 histone methyltransferase G9a promotes lung cancer invasion and metastasis by silencing the cell adhesion molecule Ep-CAM. Cancer Res. 70:7830–7840. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kondo Y, Shen L, Ahmed S, et al: Downregulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferase G9a induces centrosome disruption and chromosome instability in cancer cells. PLoS One. 3:e20372008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kubicek S, O’Sullivan RJ, August EM, et al: Reversal of H3K9me2 by a small-molecule inhibitor for the G9a histone methyltransferase. Mol Cell. 25:473–481. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu Z, Tian Y, Salwen HR, et al: Histone-lysine methyltransferase EHMT2 is involved in proliferation, apoptosis, cell invasion, and DNA methylation of human neuroblastoma cells. Anticancer Drugs. 24:484–493. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X: miRDB: a microRNA target prediction and functional annotation database with a wiki interface. RNA. 14:1012–1017. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X and El Naqa IM: Prediction of both conserved and nonconserved microRNA targets in animals. Bioinformatics. 24:325–332. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Duncan D, Shi Z and Zhang B: WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:W77–W83. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Validation of miRNA Microarray Results with Real-Time qPCR. Technical Bulletin. LC Sciences; Houston, TX, USA: | |
Law FB, Chen YW, Wong KY, et al: Identification of a novel tumor transforming gene GAEC1 at 7q22 which encodes a nuclear protein and is frequently amplified and overexpressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 26:5877–5888. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nagel S, Leich E, Quentmeier H, et al: Amplification at 7q22 targets cyclin-dependent kinase 6 in T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 22:387–392. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kwei KA, Shain AH, Bair R, et al: SMURF1 amplification promotes invasiveness in pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 6:e239242011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mu D, Chen L, Zhang X, et al: Genomic amplification and oncogenic properties of the KCNK9 potassium channel gene. Cancer Cell. 3:297–302. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ho JC, Cheung ST, Patil M, Chen X and Fan ST: Increased expression of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor attachment protein 1 (GPAA1) is associated with gene amplification in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 119:1330–1337. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kan T, Sato F, Ito T, et al: The miR-106b-25 polycistron, activated by genomic amplification, functions as an oncogene by suppressing p21 and Bim. Gastroenterology. 136:1689–1700. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Long MJ, Wu FX, Li P, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MicroRNA-10a targets CHL1 and promotes cell growth, migration and invasion in human cervical cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 324:186–196. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
John AS, Hu X, Rothman VL and Tuszynski GP: Thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) up-regulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) production in human tumor cells: exploring the functional significance in tumor cell invasion. Exp Mol Pathol. 87:184–188. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Espejo R, Rengifo-Cam W, Schaller MD, Evers BM and Sastry SK: PTP-PEST controls motility, adherens junction assembly, and Rho GTPase activity in colon cancer cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 299:C454–C463. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tan KD, Zhu Y, Tan HK, et al: Amplification and overexpression of PPFIA1, a putative 11q13 invasion suppressor gene, in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 47:353–362. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou Q, Huang T, Wang YF, Zhang KS, Chen D and Peng BG: Identification of Max binding protein as a novel binding protein of Nck1 and characterization of its role in inhibiting human liver cancer SK-HEP-1 cells. Chin Med J (Engl). 125:3336–3339. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Penna E, Orso F, Cimino D, et al: microRNA-214 contributes to melanoma tumour progression through suppression of TFAP2C. EMBO J. 30:1990–2007. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |