Open Access

HER3 protein expression as a risk factor for post‑operative recurrence in patients with early‑stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix

  • Authors:
    • Takaaki Mizuno
    • Yuki Kojima
    • Kan Yonemori
    • Hiroshi Yoshida
    • Yukiko Sugiura
    • Yohei Ohtake
    • Hitomi S. Okuma
    • Tadaaki Nishikawa
    • Maki Tanioka
    • Kazuki Sudo
    • Akihiko Shimomura
    • Emi Noguchi
    • Tomoyasu Kato
    • Tatsunori Shimoi
    • Masaya Uno
    • Mitsuya Ishikawa
    • Yasuhiro Fujiwara
    • Yuichiro Ohe
    • Kenji Tamura
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 23, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11899
  • Article Number: 38
  • Copyright: © Mizuno et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) have a poorer prognosis than those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Erb‑b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (HER3) is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family and its expression is associated with unfavorable prognosis in several cancer types, including SCC of the cervix. As there is limited information on the prognostic value of HER3 for AC and ASC of the cervix, the present study aimed to evaluate the expression of HER3 and its impact on post‑operative recurrence in patients with AC and ASC of the cervix. This retrospective study included 39 patients with early‑stage AC and ASC who underwent primary surgery between January 1997 and December 2017. Immunohistochemical staining for HER3 was performed on formalin‑fixed paraffin‑embedded surgical specimens. The possible influence of HER3 expression on disease‑free survival (DFS) was studied by using multivariate Cox regression with adjustment for established risk factors of post‑operative recurrence. High expression of HER3 (HER3‑high) was detected in 85.1% of cases of AC (23/27) and in 58.3% of cases of ASC (7/12). The median follow‑up duration was 63.1 months and Kaplan‑Meier analysis indicated that the 5‑year DFS rates of patients with AC and ASC of the cervix were 56.7% in patients with HER3‑high and 77.8% in patients with HER3‑low (log rank, P=0.20). On multivariate analysis, HER3‑high [hazard ratio (HR)=6.32, 95% CI: 1.10‑36.26, P=0.039), pelvic lymph node metastasis (HR=7.61, 95% CI: 2.07‑28.00, P=0.002) and vascular invasion (HR=4.28, 95% CI: 1.12‑16.31, P=0.033) were indicated to be independent predictors of DFS. To date, the present study is the most comprehensive analysis to evaluate the expression of HER3 in patients with early‑stage AC and ASC of the cervix. The results suggested that HER3 overexpression may be an independent risk factor for post‑operative recurrence. However, these results and the prognostic value of HER3 should be confirmed in a larger sample.

Introduction

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer type among females worldwide, with >500,000 new cases diagnosed in 2018; 11,000 patients are diagnosed and ~3,000 patients die annually in Japan (1,2). Although squamous cell carcinoma continues to be the most frequent pathological type, the incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) has increased in several countries (35). AC and ASC of the uterine cervix accounted for 15–25% of all cases of cervical cancer (3,5) and the affected patients were younger than those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (5).

The prognosis of patients with AC and ASC has been evaluated in several studies, but the results remain controversial (618). Certain studies have indicated that the prognosis of AC and ASC is worse than that of SCC, while others reported a similar prognosis. In addition, AC and ASC are less radiosensitive than SCC (16,19). Hence, it remains elusive whether the treatment strategy used for SCC may be adopted for patients with AC and ASC. Therefore, the factors associated with the prognosis of AC and ASC and the biomarkers targetable with molecular targeted drugs require investigation.

Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (HER3) is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family and is a cell-surface receptor tyrosine kinase (20). HER3 overexpression is associated with unfavorable prognosis in several cancer types (21). Although the incidence of HER3 overexpression ranged from 55.6 to 74.4% among cases of SCC of the cervix and HER3 was indicated to be a poor prognostic factor, information regarding the expression of HER3 in cases of AC and ASC of the cervix and whether it is a prognostic factor remains limited (22,23). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the expression of HER3 and its significance in the post-operative recurrence in patients with AC and ASC of the cervix.

Patients and methods

Patients and specimens

The medical records of patients with cervical cancer who were diagnosed and treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan), between January 1997 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients included in the present study fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: i) Pathological diagnosis of AC and ASC of the cervix, ii) early-stage disease [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II] and iii) availability of sufficient formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens for immunohistochemical staining and analysis (24).

Specimens of 39 cases of AC (n=27) and ASC (n=12) of the cervix obtained via surgical resection were retrieved from the pathology database of the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). The histological type was based on the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the uterine cervix (4th edition) (25). The medical records of all the identified patients were evaluated to obtain the following information: Age, performance status at diagnosis, FIGO clinical stage, date of treatment initiation, date of surgery, date of radiotherapy, the administered chemotherapy regimen, date of progression, date of the last follow-up and survival status. The protocol for the human study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan; no. 2014-393). Written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants.

Immunohistochemical staining and analysis

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from each of the cases were reviewed to obtain representative sections. New 4-µm-thick sections were prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens and were immunohistochemically stained. After deparaffinization, the expression of HER3 was determined by immunohistochemistry using a rabbit monoclonal antibody against HER3 (1:59 dilution; clone D22C5; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). Antigen retrieval was achieved by using a PT Link machine (Dako) at high pH. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed using the Dako autostainer Link48 (Dako) and EnVision Flex Mini kit (Dako), according to the manufacturer's protocols. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.

HER3 expression was evaluated by an experienced pathologist in accordance with the HER2 testing guidelines for gastroesophageal cancer from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology and American Society of Clinical Oncology (26). High HER3 expression (HER3-high) was defined as a score of 2+ or 3+ and low HER3 expression (HER3-low) was defined as a score of 0 or 1+. Immunohistochemical staining of p16 (clone INK4, 1;10, BD Bioscience) was also performed for the representative tumor section of each case. The slides were evaluated by the pathologist with the cut-off for positivity >70%. The pathologist was blinded to the clinical data while evaluating the slides.

Statistical analysis

Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time between the date of initial surgery to the date of documentation of relapse, including locoregional recurrence and/or distant metastasis or death from any cause. The absence of relapse or death was treated as a censored observation. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of initial surgery to the date of death from any cause. Patients without such events were treated as censored observations. DFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. A possible influence of HER3 expression on survival was assessed by using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses with the forced entry method after adjustment for established risk factors of post-operative recurrence (2729). A two-sided P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University) (30), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 39 patients with stages Ib1-IIB included in the present study, 27 were histologically classified as AC and 12 as ASC. The demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table I. The study population included 39 patients with an age range of 32 to 67 years. The median age of the patients was 43 years. The clinical stage of the patients determined according to the FIGO staging system was stage IB1 in 25 patients, IB2 in 9 and IIB in 4 patients. Lymph node metastasis was present in 38.5% of patients. Expression of p16 was positive in 79.8% (31/39) of all cases, 70.4% (19/27) of cases of AC and 100.0% (12/12) of cases of ASC.

Table I.

Patient characteristics.

Table I.

Patient characteristics.

HER3 expression

ParameterHigh (n=30)Low (n=9)P-value
Age (years)42.5 (30–67)46.0 (40–64)0.384
FIGO stage (2014) 0.216
  IB120 (66.6)5 (55.5)
  IB28 (26.6)2 (22.2)
  IIB2 (6.6)2 (22.2)
Histological type 0.066
  Adenocarcinoma23 (76.6)4 (44.4)
  Adenosquamous carcinoma7 (23.3)5 (55.5)
Parametrial invasion 0.311
  Present8 (26.7)4 (44.4)
  Absent22 (73.3)5 (55.5)
Vascular invasion 0.134
  013 (43.3)3 (33.3)
  113 (43.3)5 (55.5)
  23 (10.0)1 (11.1)
  31 (3.3)0 (0.0)
Tumor size (cm) 0.379
  ≤415 (50.0)6 (66.6)
  >415 (50.0)3 (3.33)
Lymph node metastases 0.047
  Present21 (70.0)3 (33.3)
  Absent9 (30.0)6 (66.6)
Treatment 0.145
  Surgery alone15 (50.0)3 (33.3)
  Surgery + adjuvant radiation13 (43.3)5 (55.5)
Surgery + adjuvant chemoradiation2 (6.6)1 (11.1)

[i] Values are expressed as the median (range) or n (%). FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HER3, Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3.

Immunohistochemistry staining for HER3 expression in AC and ACC of the cervix

HER3 expression was determined in the surgical specimens from 39 patients with AC and ASC of the cervix using immunohistochemistry. Membranous HER3 overexpression was evaluated according to the criteria described above and representative images are provided in Fig. 1. High expression of HER3 (HER3-high) was determined in 85.1% (23/27) of cases of AC and in 58.3% (7/12) of cases of ASC (Table II).

Table II.

Expression score of HER3 in cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.

Table II.

Expression score of HER3 in cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.

Histological typeN01+2+3+2+/3+
Adenocarcinoma270 (0.0)4 (14.8)12 (44.4)11 (40.7)23 (85.1)
Adenosquamous carcinoma120 (0.0)5 (41.7)4 (33.3)3 (25.0)7 (58.3)
Total390 (0.0)9 (23.1)16 (41.0)14 (35.9)30 (76.9)

[i] Values are expressed as n (%). HER3, Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3.

Association of HER3 expression with outcomes

During the median follow-up of 63.1 months, the 5-year DFS rates in patients with AC and ASC of the cervix were 56.7% among patients with HER3-high and 77.8% among patients with HER3-low (log-rank P=0.20; Fig 2A). The 5-year OS rates were 83.3% among patients with HER3-high and 100.0% among patients with HER3-low (log-rank P=0.22; Fig 2B). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that HER3-high [hazard ratio (HR)=6.32, 95% CI: 1.10–36.26, P=0.039), pelvic lymph node metastasis (HR=7.61, 95% CI: 2.07–28.00, P=0.002) and vascular invasion (HR=4.28, 95% CI: 1.12–16.31, P=0.033) were independent prognostic factors regarding DFS (Table III).

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

Univariate Multivariate


FactorHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
HER3 (high vs. low)2.540.57–11.310.2206.321.10–36.260.039
Pelvic lymph node metastasis (present vs. absent)3.171.12–8.980.0307.612.07–28.000.002
Tumor size (≥4 vs. <4 cm)1.670.60–4.630.3221.050.30–3.690.942
Vascular invasion (present vs. absent)3.281.04–10.390.0434.281.12–16.310.033
Parametrial invasion (present vs. absent)1.620.58–4.570.3610.680.18–2.590.570

[i] HR, hazard ratio; HER3, Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3.

Discussion

The results of the present study suggested an association between the clinical outcomes of early-stage AC and ASC of the cervix and HER3 expression. Although HER3 expression did not exhibit any statistical significance on univariate Cox analysis for DFS, HER3 was a significant predictor on multivariate Cox analysis, indicating unfavorable DFS and OS prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was so far the largest to evaluate the expression of HER3 and its significance on post-operative recurrence in patients with early-stage AC and ASC of the cervix.

HER3 is overexpressed in several cancer types and is associated with poor prognosis (20,3138). HER3 promotes tumor initiation and progression, mainly through heterodimerization with receptor tyrosine kinases, to activate oncogenic signaling via the PI3K/AKT pathway. In addition, HER3 expression and downstream PI3K/AKT signaling are major causes of treatment failure in cancer therapy due to their implication in therapeutic resistance (39). In the present study, HER3 expression was not a prognostic factor in the univariate Cox regression for DFS, on the other hand, HER3 overexpression appeared to be a poor prognostic factor for DFS in the multivariate Cox regression, along with pelvic lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion. This discrepancy between univariate and multivariate results can be attributed to the small number of cases and the resulting instability of the prognostic model. These results are still consistent with those of previous studies on patients with cervical cancer with SCC, in which HER3 was overexpressed in 74.4% (58/78) of patients and was associated with poor prognosis (22). In a study by Lee et al (23), 55 patients with FIGO IB-IVA cervical cancer, including 5 patients with AC and 2 with ASC, were evaluated for the expression of HER and phosphorylated AKT. However, the incidence of HER3 overexpression and its influence on survival among those populations were not presented, thereby remaining elusive. Therefore, the present study was the first to demonstrate the prognostic value of HER3 overexpression among patients with cervical AC and ASC. Due to the aforementioned discrepancy between the univariate and multivariate Cox regression model, the prognostic value of HER3 should be further verified in future studies. Combining the results of the present study with those obtained in previous studies, the incidence of HER3 overexpression was 55.6–74.4% in patients with SCC, 85.1% in patients with AC and 58.3% in patients with ASC (22,23). Whole-exome sequencing of primary frozen tumor tissues and the blood of patients with cervical cancer who did not receive any prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy indicated that the incidence of HER3 alterations was higher in patients with AC than in those with SCC (40). Several targeted therapies have been developed for HER3 and relevant studies indicate a possible therapeutic strategy for patients with cervical cancer expressing HER3 (41,42).

Surgery and/or radiotherapy are highly effective for early-stage cervical cancer. However, patients with AC and ASC of the cervix are more resistant to radiotherapy than those with SCC (16,19); therefore, novel therapies are required for patients with AC and ASC of the cervix. Recently, combination therapy with a dual antibody targeting both EGFR and HER3 and enhanced ionizing radiation was reported to be effective (43). An additive effect was observed when the dual antibody, radiation and cisplatin were combined, leading to improved patient outcomes by increasing tumor control and by activating the immune response.

The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a carcinogenic virus in humans and has been implicated in cervical cancer (44). Among head and neck cancers, HER3 was overexpressed and highly bound to PI3K in HPV-positive tumors (45). In addition, a preclinical study by Brand et al (46) reported an association between HPV infection and HER3 in head and neck cancers, indicating that HPV-positive cancers were sensitive to HER3 targeting. By contrast, no association has been detected between HPV infection and HER in patients with cervical cancer. In the population included in the present study, the incidence of both HER3 and p16 expression was high and the correlation was not significant (data not shown). Accordingly, further studies are required to evaluate the etiology of HPV infection and HER3 expression in patients with cervical cancer.

The present study has several limitations; it was a retrospective study in a single institution and included a small number of patients with AC and ASC in the cervix. In addition, as the enrollement period was long, the treatment strategy varied over the decades. Hence, further study is required to evaluate the role of HER3 in the current era of precision medicine, during which several HER3-targeting drugs are being developed (4749). In the present study, the DFS of patients who underwent surgery was evaluated, which is an important factor for such patients; however, the influence of HER3 on OS remains undetermined due to the small number of patients who died. Furthermore, even though most of the study population was positive for p16, no significant correlation between p16 and HER3 was determined. Accordingly, future studies are required to determine the etiology of HPV infection and HER3 expression in patients with cervical cancer.

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that the expression of HER3 was associated with poor DFS in patients with early-stage AC and ASC of the cervix; therefore, HER3 expression may be a novel prognostic biomarker. However, further studies are required to confirm these results and the prognostic value of HER3.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Nao Nakamura and Ms. Kotone Shoji, Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) for their secretarial assistance.

Funding

The National Cancer Center Biobank is supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, Japan.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

TM, YK, KY, HY, YS, YoO, HSO, TN, MT, KS, AS, EN, TK, TS, MU, MI, YF, YuO and KT were responsible for the conception and design of the present study, drafted the manuscript, were responsible for the collection and assembly of the data, performed the data analysis and interpretation, and read, revised and approved the final manuscript. All authors are in agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan; approval no. 2014-393). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, . Cancer Registry and Statistics. March 11–2016

3 

Castanon A, Landy R and Sasieni PD: Is cervical screening preventing adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix? Int J Cancer. 139:1040–1045. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Sasieni P and Adams J: Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England. Lancet. 357:1490–1493. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Galic V, Herzog TJ, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Burke WM, Lu YS, Hershman DL and Wright JD: Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma histology in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 125:287–291. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT and Nam JH: Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Br J Cancer. 102:1692–1698. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Lee YY, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH and Bae DS: A comparison of pure adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA. Gynecol Oncol. 120:439–443. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Matsuo K, Kawano M, Suzuki O, Miyatake T, Enomoto T, Kamiura S, Ogawa K and Kimura T: Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically-treated stage IA2-IIB cervical cancer: Adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 127:114–20. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Shingleton HM, Bell MC, Fremgen A, Chmiel JS, Russell AH, Jones WB, Winchester DP and Clive RE: Is there really a difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer. 76 (10 Suppl):1948–1955. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Farley JH, Hickey KW, Carlson JW, Rose GS, Kost ER and Harrison TA: Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 97:2196–2202. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Lea JS, Coleman RL, Garner EO, Duska LR, Miller DS and Schorge JO: Adenosquamous histology predicts poor outcome in low-risk stage IB1 cervical adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 91:558–562. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

dos Reis R, Frumovitz M, Milam MR, Capp E, Sun CC, Coleman RL and Ramirez PT: Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: An outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 107:458–463. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Kinose Y, Matsuo K, Fujiwara M, Suzuki O, Morii E, Kamiura S, Ogawa K and Kimura T: Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 22:1389–1397. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Noh JM, Park W, Kim YS, Kim JY, Kim HJ, Kim J, Kim JH, Yoon MS, Choi JH, Yoon WS, et al: Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13-10). Gynecol Oncol. 132:618–623. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Huang YT, Wang CC, Tsai CS, Lai CH, Chang TC, Chou HH, Lee SP and Hong JH: Clinical behaviors and outcomes for adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix treated by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 84:420–427. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Rose PG, Java JJ, Whitney CW, Stehman FB, Lanciano R and Thomas GM: Locally advanced adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix in gynecologic oncology group trials of cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 135:208–212. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Winer I, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Hassan O, Ahmed QF, Alosh B, Bandyopadhyay S, Thomas S, Albayrak S, Talukdar S, Al-Wahab Z, et al: The prognostic significance of histologic type in early stage cervical cancer-A multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol. 137:474–478. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Cao L, Wen H, Feng Z, Han X and Wu X: Distinctive clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for different histologic subtypes of early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 29:1244–1251. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Chen JL, Huang CY, Huang YS, Chen RJ, Wang CW, Chen YH, Cheng JC, Cheng AL and Kuo SH: Differential clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 93:661–668. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Plowman GD, Whitney GS, Neubauer MG, Green JM, McDonald VL, Todaro GJ and Shoyab M: Molecular cloning and expression of an additional epidermal growth factor receptor-related gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:4905–4909. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Li Q, Zhang R, Yan H, Zhao P, Wu L, Wang H, Li T and Cao B: Prognostic significance of HER3 in patients with malignant solid tumors. Oncotarget. 8:67140–67151. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Fuchs I, Vorsteher N, Buhler H, Evers K, Sehouli J, Schaller G and Kümmel S: The prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor correlations in squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 27:959–963. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Lee CM, Shrieve DC, Zempolich KA, Lee RJ, Hammond E, Handrahan DL and Gaffney DK: Correlation between human epidermal growth factor receptor family (EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4), phosphorylated Akt (P-Akt), and clinical outcomes after radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 99:415–421. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, . FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 125:97–98. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Bartley AN, Washington MK, Colasacco C, Ventura CB, Ismaila N, Benson AB III, Carrato A, Gulley ML, Jain D, Kakar S, et al: HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 140:1345–1363. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML and Herrington CS: World Health Organization classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th. Geneva: WHO Press; 2014

27 

Ryu SY, Kim MH, Nam BH, Lee TS, Song ES, Park CY, Kim JW, Kim YB, Ryu HS, Park SY, et al: Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy: A Korean gynecologic oncology group study. Br J Cancer. 110:278–285. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kim MK, Jo H, Kong HJ, Kim HC, Kim JW, Kim YM, Song YS, Kang SB, Mok JE and Lee HP: Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 20:1581–1386. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Wang H, Zhu L, Lu W, Xu H, Yu Y and Yang Y: Clinicopathological risk factors for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 11:3012013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 48:452–458. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Tanner B, Hasenclever D, Stern K, Schormann W, Bezler M, Hermes M, Brulport M, Bauer A, Schiffer IB, Gebhard S, et al: ErbB-3 predicts survival in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 24:4317–4323. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Witton CJ, Reeves JR, Going JJ, Cooke TG and Bartlett JM: Expression of the HER1-4 family of receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. J Pathol. 200:290–297. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Yi ES, Harclerode D, Gondo M, Stephenson M, Brown RW, Younes M and Cagle PT: High c-erbB-3 protein expression is associated with shorter survival in advanced non-small cell lung carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 10:142–148. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Reschke M, Mihic-Probst D, van der Horst EH, Knyazev P, Wild PJ, Hutterer M, Meyer S, Dummer R, Moch H and Ullrich A: HER3 is a determinant for poor prognosis in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 14:5188–5197. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Bae SY, La Choi Y, Kim S, Kim M, Kim J, Jung SP, Choi MY, Lee SK, Kil WH, Lee JE and Nam SJ: HER3 status by immunohistochemistry is correlated with poor prognosis in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 139:741–750. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ledel F, Hallstrom M, Ragnhammar P, Ohrling K and Edler D: HER3 expression in patients with primary colorectal cancer and corresponding lymph node metastases related to clinical outcome. Eur J Cancer. 50:656–662. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Qian G, Jiang N, Wang D, Newman S, Kim S, Chen Z, Garcia G, MacBeath G, Shin DM, Khuri FR, et al: Heregulin and HER3 are prognostic biomarkers in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 121:3600–3611. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ema A, Yamashita K, Ushiku H, Kojo K, Minatani N, Kikuchi M, Mieno H, Moriya H, Hosoda K, Katada N, et al: Immunohistochemical analysis of RTKs expression identified HER3 as a prognostic indicator of gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 105:1591–1600. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Amin DN, Campbell MR and Moasser MM: The role of HER3, the unpretentious member of the HER family, in cancer biology and cancer therapeutics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 21:944–950. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, . Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature. 543:378–384. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Jaiswal BS, Kljavin NM, Stawiski EW, Chan E, Parikh C, Durinck S, Chaudhuri S, Pujara K, Guillory J, Edgar KA, et al: Oncogenic ERBB3 mutations in human cancers. Cancer Cell. 23:603–617. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Karachaliou N, Lazzari C, Verlicchi A, Sosa AE and Rosell R: HER3 as a therapeutic target in cancer. BioDrugs. 31:63–73. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Bourillon L, Demontoy S, Lenglet A, Zampieri A, Fraisse J, Jarlier M, Boissière-Michot F, Perrochia H, Rathat G, Garambois V, et al: Higher anti-tumor efficacy of the dual HER3-EGFR Antibody MEHD7945a combined with ionizing irradiation in cervical cancer cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 106:1039–1051. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Crosbie EJ, Einstein MH, Franceschi S and Kitchener HC: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 382:889–899. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Pollock NI, Wang L, Wallweber G, Gooding WE, Huang W, Chenna A, Winslow J, Sen M, DeGrave KA, Li H, et al: Increased expression of HER2, HER3, and HER2:HER3 heterodimers in HPV-Positive HNSCC using a novel proximity-based assay: implications for targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res. 21:4597–4606. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Brand TM, Hartmann S, Bhola NE, Peyser ND, Li H, Zeng Y, Isaacson Wechsler E, Ranall MV, Bandyopadhyay S, Duvvuri U, et al: Human papillomavirus regulates HER3 expression in head and neck cancer: Implications for targeted HER3 therapy in HPV(+) Patients. Clin Cancer Res. 23:3072–3083. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Liu JF, Ray-Coquard I, Selle F, Poveda AM, Cibula D, Hirte H, Hilpert F, Raspagliesi F, Gladieff L, Harter P, et al: Randomized phase II trial of seribantumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced platinum-resistant or -refractory ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 34:4345–4353. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Kogawa T, Yonemori K, Masuda N, Takahashi S, Takahashi M, Iwase H, Nakayama T, Saeki T, Toyama T, Takano T, et al: Single agent activity of U3-1402, a HER3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, in breast cancer patients: Phase 1 dose escalation study. J Clin Oncol. 36 (Suppl 15):25122018. View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Janne PA, Yu HA, Johnson ML, Steuer CE, Vigliotti M, Iacobucci C, Chen S, Yu C and Dalila B. Sellami DB; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Sarah Cannon Research Institute; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University; Daiichi Sankyo Inc., : Safety and preliminary antitumor activity of U3-1402: A HER3-targeted antibody drug conjugate in EGFR TKI-resistant, EGFRm NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 37 (Suppl 15):90102019. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2020
Volume 20 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Mizuno T, Kojima Y, Yonemori K, Yoshida H, Sugiura Y, Ohtake Y, Okuma HS, Nishikawa T, Tanioka M, Sudo K, Sudo K, et al: HER3 protein expression as a risk factor for post‑operative recurrence in patients with early‑stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix. Oncol Lett 20: 38, 2020
APA
Mizuno, T., Kojima, Y., Yonemori, K., Yoshida, H., Sugiura, Y., Ohtake, Y. ... Tamura, K. (2020). HER3 protein expression as a risk factor for post‑operative recurrence in patients with early‑stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix. Oncology Letters, 20, 38. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11899
MLA
Mizuno, T., Kojima, Y., Yonemori, K., Yoshida, H., Sugiura, Y., Ohtake, Y., Okuma, H. S., Nishikawa, T., Tanioka, M., Sudo, K., Shimomura, A., Noguchi, E., Kato, T., Shimoi, T., Uno, M., Ishikawa, M., Fujiwara, Y., Ohe, Y., Tamura, K."HER3 protein expression as a risk factor for post‑operative recurrence in patients with early‑stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix". Oncology Letters 20.4 (2020): 38.
Chicago
Mizuno, T., Kojima, Y., Yonemori, K., Yoshida, H., Sugiura, Y., Ohtake, Y., Okuma, H. S., Nishikawa, T., Tanioka, M., Sudo, K., Shimomura, A., Noguchi, E., Kato, T., Shimoi, T., Uno, M., Ishikawa, M., Fujiwara, Y., Ohe, Y., Tamura, K."HER3 protein expression as a risk factor for post‑operative recurrence in patients with early‑stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix". Oncology Letters 20, no. 4 (2020): 38. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11899