Open Access

High expression of TOP2A in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis

  • Authors:
    • Hongyu Cai
    • Bingfeng Shao
    • Yuan Zhou
    • Zhong Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 11, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12095
  • Article Number: 232
  • Copyright: © Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor in the clinic. Although there are increasing numbers of available treatment methods, their therapeutic effects are not satisfactory. The clinical indicators commonly used to predict the prognosis of HCC include tumor size, degree of cirrhosis, degree of tumor differentiation and tumor microvascular invasion; however, there are currently no molecular indicators that can predict the prognosis of HCC. Due to the differences in the progression of liver cancer among individuals, there is a growing need for prognostic biomarkers to accurately stratify patients for appropriate risk‑adaptive treatment. The DNA topoisomerase 2‑α (TOP2A) gene, which is located on human chromosome 17, encodes DNA topoisomerase IIα. Previous studies have demonstrated that TOP2A indicates a poor prognosis in patients with various types of tumors, but no such studies are currently available on HCC. By analyzing the differential expression of TOP2A in 50 pairs of tumor and paracancerous tissue samples in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, the present study revealed that the expression of TOP2A was significantly higher in tumor tissue compared with that in paracancerous tissue (P=6.319x10‑16). In the collected clinical samples, the mRNA expression levels of TOP2A were significantly upregulated in HCC tumor tissues compared with those in the paracancerous tissues (P=6.40x10‑3), suggesting that TOP2A was associated with the occurrence and development of liver cancer. In addition, the associations between TOP2A expression, clinicopathological features and prognosis were analyzed using a multi‑center large sample dataset from TCGA database, and the results demonstrated that high expression of TOP2A was associated with a higher T stage, poorer clinical stage and higher histological grade compared with those in patients with low TOP2A expression. High expression of TOP2A was also identified to be associated with a poor prognosis of HCC, particularly in Asian populations. These results suggested that high expression of TOP2A in HCC tissues may be closely associated with tumor progression and metastasis, which may be used as a biological indicator to predict tumor prognosis in clinical practice.

Introduction

According to the WHO data released in May 2019, the number of new liver cancer cases was 841080 worldwide in 2018 ranked sixth, and the number of deaths was 781631, the death rate ranked third among all known types of cancer. In Asia, liver cancer ranks fourth in morbidity and third in mortality (1). The main treatment methods of primary liver cancer include surgical resection, local ablation, transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization (TACE), molecular targeting and immunotherapy under exploration (2). However, the treatment outcomes remain still unsatisfactory. As an important indicator for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), compared to healthy subjects, the serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) is increased to varying degrees in ≤70% of HCC cases. However, it has been demonstrated that AFP levels do not predict the tumor stage or prognosis (3). The clinical indicators commonly used to predict the prognosis of HCC include tumor size, degree of cirrhosis, tumor differentiation and microvascular invasion (4,5). Due to the differences in the progression of liver cancer among individuals, there is a growing need for prognostic biomarkers to accurately stratify patients for appropriate risk-adaptive treatment.

DNA topoisomerase is an enzyme that catalyzes the transformation of DNA topologies; it is present in the nucleus of living organisms and not only serves a catalytic role in the breaking and binding of DNA strands, but also affects the three-dimensional structure of DNA (6). DNA topoisomerase type I (TOP1) breaks the single strand, whereas DNA topoisomerase II (TOP2) cuts off the double chain (7). Although the two TOPs are highly homologous in structure, their distribution in the organism is significantly different, and they are not produced by the same transportation process (8). TOP2 is divided into two subtypes, of which the 1,531 amino acid 170 kDa subtype encoded by the TOP2A gene is topoisomerase IIα, and the 1,621 amino acid 180 kDa subtype encoded by the TOP2B gene is topoisomerase IIβ (9). TOP2A serves an important role in DNA synthesis and transcription, as well as chromosome segregation during mitosis (10). The location of the human TOP2A gene is on chromosome 17, and its expression is associated with cell proliferation and the cell cycle; its production and degradation are regulated by the cell cycle, and it decreases rapidly after completing mitosis (11,12). Previous studies have reported that the accumulation of the TOP2A protein occurs due to the stable upregulation of TOP2A transcription (13,14).

In addition to its physiological function, TOP2A has been reported to be a sensitive and specific marker of active proliferating cells in the late S, G and M phases of the cell cycle, indicating its importance in cancer research (15). Increased cell proliferation is a hallmark of malignant tumors, and the expression of TOP2A in proliferating cells is significantly increased; therefore, its expression levels reflect the tumor proliferation level to a certain extent and indicates invasive behavior and poor prognosis (16). In colorectal (17), liver (18), esophageal (19) and gastric cancer (20), the expression levels of TOP2A are higher compared with those in the adjacent normal tissues. TOP2A can be used as a potential biomarker to predict the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors and screen out high-risk cases in order to enable individualized treatment (21). In a study on triple-negative breast cancer, a significant association was observed between the TOP2A gene and chromosome 17 polysomy (CEP17) status, and TOP2A has a certain predictive effect on the therapeutic effect of anthracycline drugs (22). Wittmann et al (23) confirmed that the high expression of TOP2A was associated with tumor metastasis and death outcome by analyzing 102 cases of nephroblastoma. A large-scale retrospective study has demonstrated that TOP2A high expression is associated with poor differentiation and neural invasion of esophageal cancer, and is also an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of esophageal cancer (24). De Resende et al (25) have reported that high expression of TOP2A protein is associated with severe lymphatic vascular invasion and a low relapse-free survival rate in prostate cancer. In addition, in breast cancer, TOP2A expression is associated with Ki67 expression, mitotic count, tumor grade and nipple infiltration, and high expression of TOP2A adversely affects prognosis (26). High expression of TOP2A in tumors, such as pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer is also associated with regional lymph node metastasis and metastasis to other organs, and these behaviors lead to a poor prognosis (2729). In studies on endometrial (30) and adrenal gland (31) cancer, high expression of TOP2A has been demonstrated to indicate a poor prognosis. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies on TOP2A expression and prognosis in primary liver cancer are currently available.

The present study aimed to investigate the association between TOP2A expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with liver cancer, and to conduct survival analysis on the prognosis of the entire liver cancer cohort and the Asian cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to explore the feasibility of TOP2A as a prognostic indicator.

Materials and methods

Patients and samples

The study protocol and acquisition of tissue specimens were approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University (approval no. 2018-024). The patients provided informed consent for participation and publication of the present study. The inclusion criteria were patients who were clinically diagnosed with HCC and were about to undergo surgical resection, regardless of tumor size, sex and age. All specimens were verified as HCC by pathological analysis and non-HCC patients will be excluded. A total of 15 HCC and paired paracancerous liver tissue specimens were collected during hepatectomy at The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University between March and August 2018. Among the 15 cases, 7 were males and 8 were females, age range, 47–77 years old with a mean age of 63 years. The liver tissues within 2 cm from the edge of the tumor was obtained as paracancerous tissues. The specimens were immediately stored in liquid nitrogen until further experiments. These same specimens have been used in a previous study (32).

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
RNA preparation

Total RNA was extracted from 15 pairs of HCC and paired paracancerous tissues by TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Synthesis of cDNA chain 1

Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA, and Beacon Designer 8.14 (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/molecular_beacons/index.html) was used to design the RT-PCR primers. Total RNA was extracted from tumor or paracanerous tissue using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc). The RNA was subsequently treated with RNase-free DNase I (Roche Applied Science, Inc). Reverse transcription was performed using the BcaBest® RNA PCR kit (Takara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd) with a temperature protocol of 30°C for 5 min, followed by 65°C for 30 min and 98°C for 5 min. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction was conducted using the StepOnePlus® Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The primer sequences were as follows: TOP2A forward, 5′-CATTGAAGACGCTTCGTTATGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CAGAAGAGAGGGCCAGTTGTG-3′; and β-actin forward, 5′-ATAGCACAGCCTGGATAGCAACGTAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-CACCTTCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTG-3′. The qPCR mix comprised the following: 10 µl SYBR® Green I (BioRuler, Inc.), 0.8 µl (10 µmol/l) qPCR upstream and downstream primers, 2 µl cDNA, 0.4 µl 50X ROX reference dye and deionized water to 20 µl. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 1 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec and 60°C for 40 sec. All experiments were repeated three times. The relative quantitative was used by 2−ΔΔCq method (33). The results were analyzed by paired Student's t-test.

Gene expression data and clinical data from TCGA database

Gene expression and clinical data from patients with HCC were obtained from TCGA-liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) dataset (https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga). A total of 371 cases and 424 samples of gene expression data were downloaded. Among them, 50 tumor tissue samples were paired with paracancerous tissues, and the rest of the 374 samples were tumor tissue. A total of 377 cases of clinical data files were obtained, 371 cases retained after matching with tissue specimen data when analyzing the prognostic factors. Among the 371 cases, 252 were from male and 119 were from female patients, with a mean age of 59.44 years (age range, 16–90 years). Among the 371 cases, one case provided 2 tumor tissue specimens, another case provided 3 tumor tissue specimens, and the remaining 369 cases each provided one tumor tissue specimen. The total number of specimens was 374. Of the 371 cases, there was one case provided 3 tumor samples, and another case provided 2 tumor samples, so the total number of tumor samples was 374. Among these 374 tumor specimens, some clinical information was missing. Seven cases lacked T stage, 17 lacked clinical stage and 2 lacked histological grade. These cases were deleted accordingly during analysis.

Differential TOP2A expression analysis

Perl language (www.perl.org) was used to organize the downloaded data, and R (version 3.6.0) (34) was used to analyze the differences in TOP2A expression between paracancerous and tumor tissues. ‘Limma’ (35) and ‘beeswarm’ (36) packages were used to analyze the differences in the expression of TOP2A between paracancerous and tumor tissues, and Perl was used to pair the tumor tissues with paracancerous tissues for analysis.

Associations between TOP2A expression, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis

To study the associations between TOP2A expression and pathological grade, clinical and T stage, logistic regression analysis was performed using R. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for age, sex, pathological grade, clinical staging, T stage and TOP2A expression levels using the ‘survival’ package, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to compare the survival of patients stratified into high and low TOP2A expression groups.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data are presented as the mean ± SD, and the qualitative data are presented as counts or percentages. R (version 3.6.0) was used for statistical analysis. The median TOP2A expression was used as the cut-off value to determine the high and low expression groups. The exact median expression value was assigned to the low expression group. Paired t-test was used to analyze the differences in TOP2A mRNA expression in 15 pairs of fresh tumors and paracancerous tissues. When analyzing TOP2A expression data downloaded from TCGA, all 374 tumor samples were compared with 50 paracancerous tissues using unpaired Student's t-test, and 50 pairs of tumors and paracancerous tissues from the same patients were compared using paired Student's t-test. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to determine the associations between TOP2A expression and clinicopathological characteristics. Cox multivariate regression was used to ascertain the expression of TOP2A in tumor and adjacent tissues, and Renyi test was used for survival analysis.

Results

TOP2A mRNA expression in tumor and paracancerous tissues

To determine the differences in TOP2A expression between tumor and paracancerous tissues, RNA was extracted from 15 pairs of tumor and paracancerous tissues and analyzed by RT-qPCR. The mRNA expression levels of TOP2A in tumor tissues was significantly higher compared with those in paracancerous tissues normalized to β-actin (P=0.0064; Fig. 1).

TOP2A expression and clinicopathological features in TCGA-liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) dataset

In the TCGA-LIHC dataset, the expression of TOP2A in 374 tumor tissue specimens was higher compared with that in 50 paracancerous tissues (P=1.85×10−27; Fig. 2A). In 50 paired samples of tumor and paracancerous tissues, the expression levels of TOP2A in tumor tissues were higher compared with those in the paired paracancerous tissues (P=6.319×10−16; Fig. 2B).

The association between the expression of TOP2A and T stage, clinical stage and histological grade were analyzed by logistic regression. The expression levels of TOP2A in stages T3-T4 were higher compared with those in stages T1-T2 (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16–3.02; P=0.011; Table I). The expression of TOP2A in clinical stage II tumors was higher compared those in with stage I (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.11–3.17; P=0.012); the expression of TOP2A in stage III–IV was higher compared with that in stage I (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.59–4.69; P=2.90×10−4); and the expression of TOP2A in histological grade G3-G4 was higher compared with that in grade G1-G2 (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 2.07–5.07; P=3.12×10−7; Table I). Kruskal-Wallis test identified significant differences in the expression of TOP2A among different histological grades, clinical stages and T stages (Fig. 3).

Table I.

Logistic regression of TOP2A expression and patient clinicopathological characteristics.

Table I.

Logistic regression of TOP2A expression and patient clinicopathological characteristics.

CharacteristicnTotal, nOdds ratio (95% CI)P-value
T stage, T3-T4 vs. T1-T293 vs. 2743671.86 (1.16–3.02) 1.10×10−2a
Clinical stage 347
  Stage II vs. stage I86 vs. 1712571.88 (1.11–3.17) 1.20×10−2a
  Stage III–IV vs. stage I90 vs. 861762.71 (1.59–4.69) 2.90×10−4a
Histological grade, G3-G4 vs. G1-G2137 vs. 2353723.22 (2.07–5.07) 3.12×10−7a

a P<0.05. All the patients were from the TCGA cohort. TOP2A, DNA topoisomerase IIα; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

High expression of TOP2A is associated with a poor prognosis

To determine the association between TOP2A expression and prognosis, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed in data subsets stratified by clinicopathological factors. As presented in Fig. 4, the overall survival of patients with low expression of TOP2A was higher compared those with high expression (P=2.20×10−4; Fig. 4A). The 5-year survival rate of the TOP2A high expression group was 48.7%, whereas that of the low expression group was 55.4%. Among different clinical stages, the overall survival of the high expression group does not present with improved survival in any of the presented groups. Clinical stage I–III (P=1.90×10−4; Fig. 4B), stage II–III (P=5.74×10−4; Fig. 4D), stage III (P=5.99×10−3; Fig. 4F) and stage III–IV (P=2.31×10−2; Fig. 4G) exhibited significant differences between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the high and low TOP2A expression groups in the overall survival of patients at stage I and stage II (P=0.17; Fig. 4C and P=0.13; Fig. 4E), and no independent survival analysis was performed for patients at stage IV as the number of patients was low.

In the multivariate analysis, high expression of TOP2A was the only independent factor for poor prognosis of HCC (HR, 1.240; 95% CI, 1.071–1.435; P=2.23×10−6; Fig. 5A).

Effects of TOP2A expression on survival in different ethnic groups

Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed using data from Asian and non-Asian patients (all ethnic groups) in the dataset to identify whether differences in ethnicity were associated with the effects of TOP2A on patient survival in HCC. As presented in Fig. 6, the overall survival of Asian patients in the high and low TOP2A expression groups was significantly different (P=5.03×10−5), whereas among the non-Asian groups, the overall survival differences due to abnormal TOP2A expression were not significant (P=0.212). Multivariate analysis results indicated that high expression of TOP2A was an independent prognostic factor in the Asian population (HR, 2.005; 95% CI, 1.493–2.692; P=3.74×10−6; Fig. 5B).

Discussion

HCC is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide (37). After years of development, the treatment methods for HCC have gradually evolved from early surgical resection, liver transplantation, TACE, chemotherapy and radiotherapy to molecular targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy (38). AFP was previously recommended by the guidelines as a serum marker for monitoring HCC (39). A study by Agopian et al (40) reported that among 665 patients with HCC, 31.3% had AFP levels within the normal range. Although AFP is still used in the clinic, it cannot be used to monitor patients who present with normal levels of AFP (41). The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommends that in addition to AFP, vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2 can also be used as prognostic markers (42). In addition, efforts to identify new effective prognostic biomarkers for HCC are ongoing. According to previous reports, high expression levels of collagen type XXIV alpha 1 chain (43), ubiquilin 2 (44), sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain containing 1 (45), acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 4 (46) and YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 1 (47) are associated with the progression of HCC. Another study has demonstrated that in addition to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, a long non-coding RNA-based risk score is another important factor affecting the overall survival of patients with HCC (48). However, none of the above methods are currently widely used in the clinic. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new prognostic markers for HCC.

TOP2A serves an important role in various biological behaviors of cells, including DNA replication, chromosome separation, chromatin concentration and gene expression (49). As a DNA replication- and cell division-regulating enzyme, TOP2A is the main target of several anticancer drugs, such as doxorubicin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone (50). High expression levels of TOP2A in various types of tumors, such as lung adenocarcinoma, bladder urothelial carcinoma, breast, prostate and colon cancer, indicates a poor prognosis (5155), although this has not been previously reported in HCC. However, Panvichian et al (56) have demonstrated that the high expression of TOP2A in HCC is associated with the high expression of Ki67, and Ki-67 expression has been found to correlate with tumor growth rate and poor prognosis in HCC (57), which indicates that TOP2A is a potential target for the treatment of HCC. In the present study, TOP2A was selected as a potential prognostic marker of HCC for further study. Analysis of the differential expression of TOP2A in 50 pairs of tumor and paracancerous tissue specimens in TCGA database revealed that the expression of TOP2A in tumor tissue was significantly higher compared with that in paracancerous tissue. In fresh clinical samples, the mRNA levels in HCC and paired samples confirmed that TOP2A was significantly highly expressed in tumor tissues, consistent with a previous study (56), suggesting that TOP2A may be associated with the occurrence and development of liver cancer. These results suggested that the high expression levels of TOP2A in HCC may be associated with tumor growth and metastasis, and that TOP2A may be used as a biomarker to predict tumor prognosis in clinical practice.

In the present study, a high T stage, poor differentiation degree and a high clinical stage were associated with high expression levels of TOP2A. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, high expression of TOP2A was identified as an independent predictor of HCC prognosis. Zhang et al (53) have reported that TOP2A promotes colon cancer progression by regulating ERK and AKT. The ERK and AKT pathways are two key signaling pathways involved in various tumor processes associated with the malignant proliferation of cancer (58,59). Therefore, in HCC, TOP2A may also promote the proliferation of HCC by regulating these two pathways.

The results of the present study demonstrated that the cumulative survival rate of patients with high expression of TOP2A was higher compared with that of patients with low expression of TOP2A. Due to ethnic differences, the role of TOP2A expression in predicting tumor prognosis in different ethnic groups was also different (60). The association between high expression of TOP2A and poor prognosis was more significant in the Asian population compared with that the white population in the present study. The etiology of Asian HCC is mostly associated with viral hepatitis (37), which may be due to the effects of the hepatitis virus on DNA replication. Thus, the predictive effect of TOP2A on HCC may be different between the Asian and non-Asian populations.

However, there were certain limitations to the present study. First, the present study determined that high expression of TOP2A may lead to a poor prognosis of HCC using TCGA; while TCGA is a useful resource for obtaining research clues, this result needs to be verified in clinical samples, which will be performed in future studies. Second, since the present study was preliminary, the difference in the expression of TOP2A in 15 pairs of tumors and paracancerous tissues was only verified at the mRNA level, and these differences will be verified at the protein level in more cases in the future study. Third, in the survival analysis between the high and low TOP2A expression groups, a number of survival curves reversed in the late follow-up period. As Rocha-Singh (61) has reported, retrospective and observational studies present inherent potential moderate and strong bias, which may obscure, overestimate and even reverse the real effects. The appearance of this reversal may mean that beyond this time point, the value of TOP2A as a risk factor for poor prognosis of HCC began to decrease. On the other hand, cases in the TCGA database are followed up for ≤10 years. With the extension of survival time, a number of patients may succumb to other diseases than HCC, which may lead to bias in the results at the later stage of follow-up. In addition, further studies will be required in the future to establish the prediction model, in vitro and in vivo functions, signal transduction pathways and molecular mechanisms that affect the expression of TOP2A in HCC.

In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that high expression of TOP2A in HCC was associated with an advanced clinical stage, a low tumor differentiation grade and a high T stage. The expression of TOP2A may be an important biomarker for predicting the prognosis of HCC, especially in the Asian population.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Nantong Science and Technology Plan (grant no. MSZ18223), the Nantong Youth Medical Talent Fund (grant no. Youth 088) and the Youth Fund of Nantong Health Commission (grant no. WKZL2018045).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

ZC and HC were responsible for the conceptualization of the study, drafting and revision of the manuscript. BS and YZ performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol and acquisition of tissue specimens were approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University (Nantong, China) (approval no. 2018-024) and all patients provided signed informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

WHO: Cancer today. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/homeJune 24–2019

2 

Daher S, Massarwa M, Benson AA and Khoury T: Current and future treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated comprehensive review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 6:69–78. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Park SJ, Jang JY, Jeong SW, Cho YK, Lee SH, Kim SG, Cha SW, Kim YS, Cho YD, Kim HS, et al: Usefulness of AFP, AFP-L3, and PIVKA-II, and their combinations in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e58112017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Sharma SA, Kowgier M, Hansen BE, Brouwer WP, Maan R, Wong D, Shah H, Khalili K, Yim C, Heathcote EJ, et al: Toronto HCC risk index: A validated scoring system to predict 10-year risk of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. Aug 24–2017.(Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.033.

5 

Shen J, He L, Li C, Wen T, Chen W, Lu C, Yan L, Li B and Yang J: Nomograms to predict the individual survival of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Gut Liver. 11:684–692. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Visone V, Vettone A, Serpe M, Valenti A, Perugino G, Rossi M and Ciaramella M: Chromatin structure and dynamics in hot environments: Architectural proteins and DNA topoisomerases of thermophilic archaea. Int J Mol Sci. 15:17162–17187. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Choi IY, Chung IK and Muller MT: Eukaryotic topoisomerase II cleavage is independent of duplex DNA conformation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1264:209–214. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Austin CA, Lee KC, Swan RL, Khazeem MM, Manville CM, Cridland P, Treumann A, Porter A, Morris NJ and Cowell IG: TOP2B: The first thirty years. Int J Mol Sci. 19:27652018. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Bush NG, Evans-Roberts K and Maxwell A: DNA topoisomerases. EcoSal Plus. 6:2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Antoniou-Kourounioti M, Mimmack ML, Porter ACG and Farr CJ: The impact of the C-terminal region on the interaction of topoisomerase II alpha with mitotic chromatin. Int J Mol Sci. 20:12382019. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Demoulin B, Hermant M, Castrogiovanni C, Staudt C and Dumont P: Resveratrol induces DNA damage in colon cancer cells by poisoning topoisomerase II and activates the ATM kinase to trigger p53-dependent apoptosis. Toxicol In Vitro. 29:1156–1165. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Sudan S and Rupasinghe HPV: Flavonoid-enriched apple fraction AF4 induces cell cycle arrest, DNA topoisomerase II inhibition, and apoptosis in human liver cancer HepG2 cells. Nutr Cancer. 66:1237–1246. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kania EE, Carvajal-Moreno J, Hernandez VA, English A, Papa JL, Shkolnikov N, Ozer HG, Yilmaz AS, Yalowich JC and Elton TS: hsa-miR-9-3p and hsa-miR-9-5p as post-transcriptional modulators of DNA topoisomerase IIα in human leukemia K562 cells with acquired resistance to etoposide. Mol Pharmacol. 97:159–170. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kanagasabai R, Karmahapatra S, Kientz CA, Yu Y, Hernandez VA, Kania EE, Yalowich JC and Elton TS: The novel c-terminal truncated 90-kDa isoform of topoisomerase IIα (TOP2α/90) is a determinant of etoposide resistance in K562 leukemia cells via heterodimerization with the TOP2α/170 isoform. Mol Pharmacol. 93:515–525. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

D Arcy N and Gabrielli B: Topoisomerase II inhibitors and poisons, and the influence of cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Med Chem. 24:1504–1519. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Wang JC: Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: A molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 3:430–440. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Jain CK, Roychoudhury S and Majumder HK: Selective killing of G2 decatenation checkpoint defective colon cancer cells by catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1853:1195–1204. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Deng SP and Guo WL: Identifying key genes of liver cancer by networking of multiple data sets. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 16:792–800. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Yu Y, Ding S, Liang Y, Zheng Y, Li W, Yang L, Zheng X and Jiang J: Expression of ERCC1, TYMS, TUBB3, RRM1 and TOP2A in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A hierarchical clustering analysis. Exp Ther Med. 7:1578–1582. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Xing C, Cai Z, Gong J, Zhou J, Xu J and Guo F: Identification of potential biomarkers involved in gastric cancer through integrated analysis of non-coding RNA associated competing endogenous RNAs network. Clin Lab. 64:1661–1669. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Liu LM, Xiong DD, Lin P, Yang H, Dang YW and Chen G: DNA topoisomerase 1 and 2A function as oncogenes in liver cancer and may be direct targets of nitidine chloride. Int J Oncol. 53:1897–1912. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Eltohamy MI, Badawy OM, El kinaai N, Loay I, Nassar HR, Allam RM and Ali Sakr M: Topoisomerase II α gene alteration in triple negative breast cancer and its predictive role for anthracycline-based chemotherapy (Egyptian NCI Patients). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 19:3581–3589. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Wittmann S, Wunder C, Zirn B, Furtwängler R, Wegert J, Graf N and Gessler M: New prognostic markers revealed by evaluation of genes correlated with clinical parameters in wilms tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 47:386–395. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Xu XL, Zheng WH, Fu ZX, Li ZP, Xie HX, Li XX, Jiang LH, Wang Y, Zhu SM and Mao WM: Topo2A as a prognostic biomarker for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Med Oncol. 32:3962015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

de Resende MF, Vieira S, Chinen LT, Chiappelli F, da Fonseca FP, Guimarães GC, Soares FA, Neves I, Pagotty S, Pellionisz PA, et al: Prognostication of prostate cancer based on TOP2A protein and gene assessment: TOP2A in prostate cancer. J Transl Med. 11:362013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Şahin S, Gönül II, Çakır A, Seçkin S and Uluoğlu O: Clinicopathological significance of the proliferation markers Ki67, RacGAP1, and topoisomerase 2 alpha in breast cancer. Int J Surg Pathol. 24:607–613. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Pei YF, Yin XM and Liu XQ: TOP2A induces malignant character of pancreatic cancer through activating β-catenin signaling pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1864:197–207. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Labbe DP, Sweeney CJ, Brown M, Galbo P, Rosario S, Wadosky KM, Ku SY, Sjöström M, Alshalalfa M, Erho N, et al: TOP2A and EZH2 provide early detection of an aggressive prostate cancer subgroup. Clin Cancer Res. 23:7072–7083. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Villman K, Sjöström J, Heikkilä R, Hultborn R, Malmström P, Bengtsson NO, Söderberg M, Saksela E and Blomqvist C: TOP2A and HER2 gene amplification as predictors of response to anthracycline treatment in breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 45:590–596. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Ito F, Furukawa N and Nakai T: Evaluation of TOP2A as a predictive marker for endometrial cancer with taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 26:325–330. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Roca E, Berruti A, Sbiera S, Rapa I, Oneda E, Sperone P, Ronchi CL, Ferrari L, Grisanti S, Germano A, et al: Topoisomerase 2α and thymidylate synthase expression in adrenocortical cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 24:319–327. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Cai HY, Zhu XH, Qian F, Shao B, Zhou Y, Zhang Y and Chen Z: High expression of TOP2A gene predicted poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy. Transl Cancer Res. 9:983–992. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

R Core Team (2014): R, . A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: http://www.R-project.org/

35 

Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W and Smyth GK: limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:e472015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ecklund A: beeswarm: The Bee Swarm Plot, an Alternative to Stripchart. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=beeswarm

37 

Kulik L and El-Serag HB: Epidemiology and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 156:477–491 e471. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Yau T, Hsu C, Kim TY, Choo SP, Kang YK, Hou MM, Numata K, Yeo W, Chopra A, Ikeda M, et al: Nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib-experienced Asian cohort analysis. J Hepatol. 71:543–552. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Di Bisceglie AM and Hoofnagle JH: Elevations in serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Cancer. 64:2117–2120. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Agopian VG, Harlander-Locke MP, Markovic D, Zarrinpar A, Kaldas FM, Cheng EY, Yersiz H, Farmer DG, Hiatt JR and Busuttil RW: Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas that do not produce α-fetoprotein. JAMA Surg. 152:55–64. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Luo P, Wu S, Yu Y, Ming X, Li S, Zuo X and Tu J: Current status and perspective biomarkers in AFP negative HCC: Towards screening for and diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma at an earlier stage. Pathol Oncol Res. 26:599–603. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

European Association For The Study Of The Liver; European Organisation For Research and Treatment Of Cancer, . EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 56:908–943. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Yan L, Xu F and Dai C: Overexpression of COL24A1 in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts poor prognosis: A study based on multiple databases, clinical samples and cell lines. Onco Targets Ther. 13:2819–2832. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Luo YD, Yu HQ, Liu XY, Huang D, Dai HS, Fang L, Zhang YJ, Lai JJ, Jiang Y, Shuai L, et al: Prognostic and predicted significance of Ubqln2 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. 9:4083–4094. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Chen L, Liu D, Yi X, Qi L, Tian X, Sun B, Dong Q, Han Z, Li Q, Song T, et al: The novel miR-1269b-regulated protein SVEP1 induces hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation and metastasis likely through the PI3K/Akt pathway. Cell Death Dis. 11:3202020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Chen J, Ding C, Chen Y, Hu W, Lu Y, Wu W, Zhang Y, Yang B, Wu H, Peng C, et al: ACSL4 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via c-Myc stability mediated by ERK/FBW7/c-Myc axis. Oncogenesis. 9:422020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Zhao X, Chen Y, Mao Q, Jiang X, Jiang W, Chen J, Xu W, Zhong L and Sun X: Overexpression of YTHDF1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 21:859–868. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Li F, Bai L, Li S, Chen Y, Xue X and Yu Z: Construction and evaluation of a prognosis lncRNA model for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. Apr 29–2020.(Epub ahead of print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.29608.

49 

Kou F, Sun H, Wu L, Li B, Zhang B, Wang X and Yang L: TOP2A promotes lung adenocarcinoma cells' malignant progression and predicts poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. J Cancer. 11:2496–2508. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Liu T, Zhang H, Yi S, Gu L and Zhou M: Mutual regulation of MDM4 and TOP2A in cancer cell proliferation. Mol Oncol. 13:1047–1058. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Zeng S, Liu A, Dai L, Yu X, Zhang Z, Xiong Q, Yang J, Liu F, Xu J, Xue Y, et al: Prognostic value of TOP2A in bladder urothelial carcinoma and potential molecular mechanisms. BMC Cancer. 19:6042019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Badawy OM and Loay I: FISH analysis of TOP2A and HER-2 aberrations in female breast carcinoma on archived material: Egyptian NCI experience. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 27:216–222. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Zhang R, Xu J, Zhao J and Bai JH: Proliferation and invasion of colon cancer cells are suppressed by knockdown of TOP2A. J Cell Biochem. 119:7256–7263. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Xiong Y, Yuan L, Chen L, Zhu Y, Zhang S, Liu X, Xiao Y and Wang X: Identifying a novel biomarker TOP2A of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) associated with smoking by co-expression network analysis. J Cancer. 9:3912–3922. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Nelson WG, Haffner MC and Yegnasubramanian S: The structure of the nucleus in normal and neoplastic prostate cells: Untangling the role of type 2 DNA topoisomerases. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 6:107–113. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

56 

Panvichian R, Tantiwetrueangdet A, Angkathunyakul N and Leelaudomlipi S: TOP2A amplification and overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues. Biomed Res Int. 2015:3816022015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Ng IO, Na J, Lai EC, Fan ST and Ng M: Ki-67 antigen expression in hepatocellular carcinoma using monoclonal antibody MIB1. A comparison with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Am J Clin Pathol. 104:313–318. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Kempf RC, Long J, Laidler P, Mijatovic S, Maksimovic-Ivanic D, Stivala F, Mazzarino MC, et al: Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR pathways in controlling growth and sensitivity to therapy-implications for cancer and aging. Aging (Albany NY). 3:192–222. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Zhao J, Ou B, Han D, Wang P, Zong Y, Zhu C, Liu D, Zheng M, Sun J, Feng H and Lu A: Tumor-derived CXCL5 promotes human colorectal cancer metastasis through activation of the ERK/Elk-1/Snail and AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin pathways. Mol Cancer. 16:702017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Echevarria MI, Awasthi S, Cheng CH, Berglund AE, Rounbehler RJ, Gerke TA, Takhar M, Davicioni E, Klein EA, Freedland SJ, et al: African American specific gene panel predictive of poor prostate cancer outcome. J Urol. 202:247–255. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Rocha-Singh KJ: Retrospective real-world studies of paclitaxel and mortality: Defining the many faces of bias. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. May 14–2020.(Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2020
Volume 20 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Cai H, Shao B, Zhou Y and Chen Z: High expression of TOP2A in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. Oncol Lett 20: 232, 2020
APA
Cai, H., Shao, B., Zhou, Y., & Chen, Z. (2020). High expression of TOP2A in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. Oncology Letters, 20, 232. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12095
MLA
Cai, H., Shao, B., Zhou, Y., Chen, Z."High expression of TOP2A in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis". Oncology Letters 20.5 (2020): 232.
Chicago
Cai, H., Shao, B., Zhou, Y., Chen, Z."High expression of TOP2A in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis". Oncology Letters 20, no. 5 (2020): 232. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12095