Open Access

Inositol 1,4,5‑trisphosphate receptor type 3 is involved in resistance to apoptosis and maintenance of human hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Marcone Loiola Dos Santos
    • Andressa França
    • Antônio Carlos Melo Lima Filho
    • Rodrigo M. Florentino
    • Paulo Henrique Diniz
    • Fernanda Oliveira Lemos
    • Carlos Alberto Xavier Gonçalves
    • Vitor Lima Coelho
    • Cristiano Xavier Lima
    • Giselle Foureaux
    • Michael H. Nathanson
    • Paula Vieira Teixeira Vidigal
    • M. Fátima Leite
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 25, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13150
  • Article Number: 32
  • Copyright: © Dos Santos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The expression of the inositol 1,4,5‑trisphosphate receptor type 3 (ITRP3) in hepatocytes is a common event in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), regardless of the type of underlying liver disease. However, it is not known whether ITPR3 expression in hepatocytes is involved in tumor maintenance. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is an association between ITPR3 expression and clinical and morphological parameters using HCC samples obtained from liver explants from patients (n=53) with different etiologies of underlying chronic liver disease (CLD). ITPR3 expression, mitosis and apoptosis were analyzed in human liver samples by immunohistochemistry. Clinical and event‑free survival data were combined to assess the relationship between ITPR3 and liver cancer growth in patients. RNA sequencing analysis was performed to identify apoptotic genes altered by ITPR3 expression in a liver tumor cell line. ITPR3 was highly expressed in HCC tumor cells relative to adjacent CLD tissue and healthy livers. There was an inverse correlation between ITPR3 expression and mitotic and apoptotic indices in HCC, suggesting that ITPR3 contributed to the maintenance of HCC by promoting resistance to apoptosis. This was confirmed by the upregulation of CTSB, CHOP and GADD45, genes involved in the apoptotic pathway in HCC. The expression of ITPR3 in the liver may be a promising prognostic marker of HCC.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the commonest primary liver malignancy and its incidence is increasing worldwide (1). According to the GLOBOCAN database, in 2020, including intrahepatic bile ducts, there were 905,677 new cases of liver cancer around the world, accompanied by 830,180 new deaths (2). Liver cirrhosis is a major risk factor for HCC (3). Although liver transplantation is the primary long term curative treatment, HCC still has a recurrence rate of 10–15% in transplant patients (4). Since biopsy is not mandatory for HCC diagnosis (5), the availability of tumor specimens for analysis is limited, which in turn has limited our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis.

The calcium ion (Ca2+) is an intracellular second messenger involved in energy metabolism, cell cycle control, gene expression, cell proliferation, cell migration, necrosis and apoptosis in nearly every cell type, including hepatocytes (6). The inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (ITPR) is the only intracellular Ca2+ release channel expressed in the liver, with all three isoforms described in humans and rodents (7,8). The expression of each ITPR varies among cell type, having distinct subcellular distribution and biophysical properties (9). For instance, under physiological conditions type 1 (ITPR1) and 2 (ITPR2) are the predominant isoforms in hepatocytes (10,11), while isoform 3 (ITPR3) is absent or minimally expressed (12). However, ITPR3 becomes significantly expressed in hepatocytes in acute (13,14) and chronic liver diseases, as well as in HCC and in liver cancer cell lines (15,16). ITPR3 expression is also increased in other malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma (17), colon cancer (18), melanoma (19), mesothelioma and prostate cancer (20).

Epigenetic events have been associated with the expression of ITPR3 in HCC, with hypomethylation of the promoter region of the ITPR3 gene upregulating its expression (16). In contrast, the promoter regions of ITPR1 and ITPR2 are already demethylated in normal hepatocytes (16), consistent with the observation that ITPR1 and ITPR2 are constitutively expressed in this cell type (10).

To understand the biological role of ITPR3 in HCC, the present study compared ITPR3 expression in HCC and adjacent cirrhotic parenchyma in patients with different types of underlying chronic liver disease. It also correlated ITPR3 expression with clinical and morphological parameters in order to investigate whether ITPR3 could serve as a prognostic marker.

Materials and methods

Sample characterization

A total of 53 liver explants from patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG; Federal University of Minas Gerais), Brazil, between January 2002 and December 2017, were retrospectively reviewed after the study was approval by the local Ethics Committee, COEP-UFMG, in the city of Belo Horizonte, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil (CAAE 71206617.8.0000.5149) and written informed consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives. Histologically normal tissues were obtained from liver resections of patients with metastatic colon cancer between 2010 and 2017 at Hospital das Clínicas (UFMG), after rigorous examination by an experienced pathologist.

A representative slide of each case was selected and analyzed after staining with conventional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry. Formalin-fixed (concentration 10%; duration 12 h at room temperature) and paraffin-embedded samples were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (10 mM) containing 0.6% peroxide of hydrogen (heating temperature, 65°C for 8 h in the thermal oven), followed by four immersions in xylene (the first for 20 min and the others with 1 min duration) and three immersions in absolute alcohol (the first for 5 min and the others with 1 min duration). Afterwards, the slides were immersed in running water for 3 min. The Novolink Polymer Detection System (cat. no. RE7200-CE; Leica Microsystems, Inc.) was used in the subsequent steps as described previously (21). Primary antibodies against ITPR3 (anti-ITPR3; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA; cat. no. HPA003915) and ssDNA labeling (anti-Single Stranded DNA; cat. no. 18731; Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Co., Ltd.) were incubated overnight at room temperature in a 1:100 dilution, followed by incubation with detection polymer for 40 min at room temperature. DAB was used for signal detection.

Clinical pre-OLT data and histopathological parameters of the explanted liver were retrospectively collected from the medical records, including sex, age, etiology of the underlying chronic liver disease (CLD), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and CHILD-Pugh scores (CHILD); prognostic models that estimate the severity of underlying liver condition, pre-OLT serum levels of α fetoprotein (AFP), number of nodules, size of the greatest nodules, microvascular invasion and histological grade. The medians of MELD, AFP, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and serum albumin were obtained from the sum of the values of each of these clinical data for each patient. Therefore, the medians reflect the mean of the total sum of the 53 patients in this study, between the minimum and maximum values.

Outcomes, such as death from any cause or tumor recurrence since OLT and event-free survival (EFS), defined as the time interval between the OLT date and the occurrence of the event or ending of the follow-up period (December 20, 2017), were analyzed.

Analysis of ITPR3 expression intensity and ssDNA labeling index

To evaluate ITPR3 expression, images of immunohistochemistry slides stained for ITPR3 from 10 different fields (magnification, ×40) were captured in tumor and adjacent cirrhotic parenchyma through an optical microscope (Zeiss GmbH). The intensity of ITPR3 staining was evaluated by delimiting 10 cytoplasmic regions, excluding the nucleus, using ImageJ 1.50i software (National Institutes of Health). The software performed this analysis through a histogram, which expressed the intensity of the pixels in each selected region on a scale between 0–255. ITPR3 expression intensity was expressed as the mean of 10 analyzed cells in each of the 10 imaged fields.

Mitotic index evaluation

A total of two experienced liver pathologists identified areas of interest and counted the number of mitotic cells in 10 high-power fields (HPF) of H&E stained slides (magnification, ×20) in order to identify areas containing mitotic figures, in metaphase or anaphase. Following Baak (22), the mitotic cells were counted only with a complete agreement between the two pathologists through a multi-head microscope. The delineation between low mitotic index in samples with >5 mitotic figures at 10 HPF and high mitotic index in samples with ≥5 mitotic figures at 10 HPF was based on previous studies (2327).

Pre-processing of raw RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data

Raw read sequences were pre-processed by filtering out read sequences with less than 36 bp, removing low quality or N bases from the read ends, trimming Illumina adapters, scanning the read with a 4-base wide sliding window and cutting when the average quality per base dropped below 15 (LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:36) by Trimmomatic v0.39 (28).

The raw RNA-seq data were obtained in our previous publication, through experiments with HepG2 (16), considered a cell line of liver cancer. A commercially available CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to eliminate ITPR3 in HepG2 liver cancer cells (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (cat. no. 11320033) supplemented with L-glutamine (1 mM; cat. no. 25030149), fetal bovine serum (10% v/v; cat. no. A4766801) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/ml and 100 mg/ml; cat. no. 15140122) at 37°C in a humid environment with an artificial atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Quantification and differential gene expression analysis

Quantification of the gene expression (−g) was performed by Salmon v1.2.1 (29). The transcriptome index was built using the cDNA sequences of the Homo sapiens assembly version GRCh38 downloaded from Ensembl release 104 (30). The estimated number of reads were used for the differential gene expression analysis. Genes with low expression levels were removed; genes with counts scaled by total mapped reads per million >1 in at ≥9 samples were retained for differential gene expression analysis. DESeq2 (31) was applied to evaluate the differential gene expression using DEBrowser v1.16.1 (32). Genes were considered differentially expressed when they had an adjusted P-value <0.05; fold-change ≤-1.5 (downregulated or more enriched in control condition).

Identification of differentially expressed genes associated with apoptosis

Genes participating in the human apoptosis route were extracted from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathways (33) Apoptosis map (hsa04210) was obtained using the rest application programming interface of KEGG. Genes on the apoptosis pathway were mapped to their corresponding UniProt identifiers by UniProt's idmapping (The Uniprot Consortium 2021) (34). The same was done for the ensemble gene IDs of differentially expressed genes. An in-house custom python script was used to compare both lists and identify differentially expressed genes participating on the apoptosis pathway. A custom colorized version of the apoptosis pathway, containing upregulated genes in green, downregulated genes in red and non-differentially expressed genes in white was generated using KEGG Mapper (35).

Heatmap

Heatmaps of the top 50 differentially expressed genes sorted by the average Reads per Kilobase per Million of mapped reads were generated for each condition by Heatmapper (36) using average linkage clustering and Euclidean measurement methods.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics summarized the data, which were expressed as numbers and percentages (categorical) and as median and interquartile range (continuous). A normality test (Shapiro-Wilk) was performed for each continuous variable. For comparison between the etiological groups, χ2 or the Fisher's exact test was applied in categorical variables and Mann Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test in continuous data. In multiple comparisons, Dunn's test was applied after the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariate COX regression model with covariance structure was performed to determine the model for EFS. Moreover, to evaluate the correlation between the clinicopathological parameter and ITPR3 expression, Spearman's coefficient was used. SPSS software, v20 (IBM Corp.), was used for statistical analysis. Three technical replicates were used per sample in the analyses. Final results were expressed as the mean of the three values. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The etiologies of the underlying chronic liver diseases among the explanted livers were distributed as follows: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (n=31; 58.5%), alcoholic liver disease (ALD; n=16; 30.2%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC; n=6; 11.3%). Multiple etiologies or coexistence of other liver pathologies were considered exclusion criteria.

Among all etiological groups, the median age of the patients was 57.09 years (range, 41.11-74.03). The median MELD score was 15.0 (range, 6.0-32.0) and the median AFP was 123.78 (range, 1.00-2883.00). The median total bilirubin was 2.65 (range, 0.50-8.70), the median international normalized ratio was 1.045 (range, 0.990-2.690) and the median creatinine was 1.02 (range, 0.14-3.00). The median alanine aminotransferase was 91.3 (range, 24.0-325.0), the median aspartate aminotransferase was 85.54 (range, 25.00-267.00) and the median serum albumin was 3.20 (range, 2.00-4.80). All clinical and laboratory data are summarized in Table I.

Table I.

Clinical and laboratory data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table I.

Clinical and laboratory data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

ParameterMinimumMedianMaximum
Age (years)41.1157.0974.03
MELD6.015.032.0
AFP (ng/ml)1.00123.782883.00
TBIL (mg/dl)0.502.658.70
INR0.9901.0452.690
Creatinine (mg/dl)0.141.023.00
ALT (U/l)24.091.3325.0
AST (U/l)25.0085.54267.00
ALB (g/dl)2.003.204.80

[i] MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; AFP α fetoprotein; TBIL, total bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALB, albumin.

Morphological descriptions of the livers from HCC patients are presented in Table II. The number of nodules was categorized into two groups: ≤3 nodules and >3 nodules. Vascular invasion was categorized as present or absent. Differentiation grade, according to Edmondson and Steiner (37), was classified into I and II (Low grade; well differentiated) and III and IV (high grade; poorly differentiated). The non-categorical data (mitosis and nodule size) are expressed as median values.

Table II.

Anatomopathological characteristics of liver from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table II.

Anatomopathological characteristics of liver from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clinical parametersValue
Nodules numbera
  ≤326 (55.3%)
  >321 (44.7%)
Vascular invasiona
  Present23 (54.8%)
  Absent19 (45.2%)
Differentiation degreea
  Low degree (I–II)35 (72.9%)
  High degree (III–IV)13 (27.1%)
Histological typea
  Pseudo-acinar6 (12.8%)
  Solid3 (6.4%)
  Trabecular22 (46.8%)
  Pseudo-acinar/trabecular16 (34.0%)
Mitosis (10 HPF)b5.0 (0-22.0)
Nodule size (cm)b3.0 (1-10.5)

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-ol-23-01-13150'] } Data are expressed as

a absolute numbers (percentage) or

b median (interquartile range). HPF, high-power fields.

As ITPR3 expression is a common event in HCC development (16), the presence and distribution of this Ca2+ channel was evaluated in HCC samples from different etiologies. ITPR3 staining of cholangiocytes was used as an internal positive control, as this liver cell type constitutively expresses ITPR3 (29). There was greater ITPR3 labeling, both in the non-tumor regions of the explants (Fig. 1A) and the tumor regions (Fig. 1B), relative to hepatocytes from healthy control livers. ITPR3 labeling in the tumor region of patients with HCC caused by HCV (Fig. 1C) or ALD (Fig. 1D) were higher in comparison with the adjacent non-tumor region, while no difference was observed between these two regions in CC patients (Fig. 1E). Although the level of ITPR3 staining was similar among the etiologic groups in both the cirrhotic parenchyma and the tumor regions (Fig. 1F), the pattern of labelling varied among groups. In the tumor regions and in the underlying cirrhotic parenchyma, homogeneous staining of ITPR3 was observed, with ITPR3 dispersed throughout the hepatocyte cytoplasm (Fig. 1A and B; blue arrows). In some cases, as observed in CC, a predominant perinuclear region of ITPR3 staining (Fig. 1A and B; black arrows) was present.

Figure 1.

Representative images of ITPR3 labeling in HCC, underlying cirrhotic parenchyma and non-tumor livers (controls). (A) ITPR3 labeling in cirrhosis in patients diagnosed with HCV (n=31), ALD (n=16), CC (n=6) and healthy (control; n=2). Scale bar=200 µm (magnification, ×5), 50 µm (magnification, × 20) and 25 µm (magnification, ×40). Black arrows indicate ITPR3 perinuclear localization in hepatocytes. Blue arrows indicate ITPR3 cytoplasmatic localization in hepatocytes. (B) ITPR3 labeling in tumor (HCC) region of patients diagnosed with HCV (n=31), ALD (n=16), CC (n=6) and healthy (control; n=3). Black arrows indicate ITPR3 perinuclear localization in hepatocytes. Blue arrows indicate ITPR3 cytoplasmatic localization in hepatocytes. (C) Representative graph of the intensity of ITPR3 marking in HCC regions and cirrhotic parenchyma of patients with HCV compared with non-tumor livers (control; n=31; ****P<0.0001; ***P<0.0001). (D) Representative graph the intensity of ITPR3 marking in HCC regions and cirrhotic parenchyma of patients with ALD compared with non-tumor livers (control; n=16; **P<0.0057; ***P<0.0001). (E) Representative graph the intensity of ITPR3 marking in HCC regions and cirrhotic parenchyma of patients with CC compared with non-tumor livers (control; n=06; ****P<0.0001). (F) Representative graph the ITPR3 labeling intensity in tumor samples and cirrhotic parenchyma comparing the three etiologies (****P<0.0001). ITPR3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate type 3 receptor; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; ALD, alcoholic liver disease; CC, cryptogenic cirrhosis; ALD, alcoholic liver disease.

As in other malignancies, ITPR3 expression is an early event in HCC carcinogenesis (16,18) which may then relate to morphological aspects as well as clinical outcomes of patients affected by the disease. Thus, the correlation between ITPR3 expression and clinicopathological parameters was investigated. Table III showed that serum AST levels positively correlated with the intensity of the tumor ITPR3 labeling profile (P<0.02), a correlation that was not observed in the adjacent parenchyma (P>0.4; using Spearman's statistical test).

Table III.

Correlation between ITPR3 labeling intensity with anatomopathological and clinical data parameters.

Table III.

Correlation between ITPR3 labeling intensity with anatomopathological and clinical data parameters.

Clinical parametersCirrhosis P-valueTumor P-value
Number nodules0.1200.296
Vascular invasion0.6370.746
Necrosis0.1140.461
Fibrosis0.7520.456
Tumor inflammation0.3830.552
Intracellular characteristics0.9270.825
Differentiation degree0.6770.668
Histological pattern0.6010.941
MELD0.3950.393
AFP (ng/ml)0.7030.781
TBIL (mg/dl)0.4960.694
INR0.4030.344
Creatinine (mg/dl)0.2160.248
ALT (U/l)0.4100.281
AST (U/l)0.4970.018a
Mitosis (10 HPF)-0.0098b

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn2-ol-23-01-13150'] } MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; AFP, α fetoprotein; TBIL, total bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase

a (P<0.098. Spearman post hoc test); AST, aspartate transaminase; ALB, albumin; HPF, high-power fields

b (P<0.098; Student t-test).

A high mitotic index (≥5/10 HPF) is a poor prognostic factor in HCC, as well as with intrahepatic metastasis, larger tumor size, higher AFP levels, advanced tumor stage (24,28), vascular invasion, poor histological differentiation and recurrence rate (26). Therefore, the mitotic index was correlated with the intensity of ITPR3 labeling. Mitotic index was categorized as either low (<5) or high (>5). The majority of cases (62.8%) had a low mitotic index (n=22), while 37.2% (n=13) exhibited high mitotic index. In addition, patients with greater ITPR3 staining exhibited a lower mitotic index, while patients with less ITPR3 labeling intensity exhibited a higher mitotic index (Fig. 2A). The mitotic index was inversely associated with ITPR3 expression in the tumor region (P<0.01; using unpaired Student's t-test). These results suggest that cell proliferation is not the process by which ITPR3 regulates liver tumor maintenance. Therefore it was investigated whether Ca2+ may instead modulate apoptosis.

Apoptosis is involved in both cancer growth (19) and liver regeneration (30). Our group has previously demonstrated that ITPR3 expression can induce resistance to cell death in HCC (16). Thus, the correlation between the apoptotic marker ssDNA labelling and ITPR3 expression was investigated. In the HCC samples, 69.7% (n=23) had a low apoptotic index (≤50%), whereas 30.3% (n=10) exhibited a high apoptotic percentage (>50%) (Fig. 2B). Patients with higher intensity of ITPR3 staining exhibited a low apoptotic percentage, while patients with lower intensity of ITPR3 displayed a higher apoptotic percentage (P<0.0005; Fig. 2C). These findings suggested that upregulation of ITPR3 correlates with higher apoptosis resistance, which could contribute to tumor maintenance.

As the mitotic index and apoptotic percentage were both inversely associated with the intensity of tumor ITPR3 staining, whether these two parameters correlated with each other in HCC was evaluated. In the specimens of the present study, the degree of apoptosis and mitosis were directly related (P<0.05 by unpaired Student's t-test; Fig. 2D), indicating that these events were closely related in the context of the role of ITPR3 in the modulation of the cell cycle and tumoral maintenance in HCC.

To improved understanding of the mechanism by which ITPR3 expression in hepatocytes is protective, rather than permissive, of cell death by apoptosis, RNA-seq was analyzed comparing global gene expression patterns between wild-type and ITPR3 knockout HepG2 cells. The apoptotic genes CTSB, CHOP and GADD45 were found to be upregulated in the ITPR3 KO cells (Figs. 3 and S1). CTSB is a protease whose overexpression indicates poor prognosis of patients with HCC, facilitating tumor migration and invasion (38). CHOP is a potential pro-apoptotic oncogene in HCC, participating in the promotion of hepatic carcinogenesis through pathways involved in crosstalk with ATF6 (39). The GADD45 family of proteins responds to physiological and environmental cellular stress (40) through apoptosis (41), with a specific under-expression in HCC that correlates with worse prognosis (41). These results suggest that chronic ITPR3 expression may promote an anti-apoptotic response pathway in liver cancer through modulation of gene expression and proteasome activity.

In the survival analysis, the median event-free survival (EFS) was 113.2 months (range, 93.1-133.2), considering all etiologies together. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed a significant difference comparing the EFS among etiologic groups (Renyi test=0.015; Fig. 4). This difference was identified between CC and HCV etiologies (P=0.001). However, neither ITPR3 expression in the tumor nor in the cirrhotic region was associated with EFS outcome. Together, the results suggested that ITPR3 expression in transformed hepatocytes is implicated in evasion of apoptosis, which contributes to the maintenance of HCC.

Discussion

Hepatocarcinogenesis is a process that involves multiple steps and in which several pathways can interact (42). Among them, regulators of cell proliferation and survival are prominent (43). Although different types of underlying CLD can lead to tumorigenesis through different mechanisms (44,45), de novo expression of the ITPR3 Ca2+ channel was noted as a common molecular signaling pathway that occurs in all HCC-related etiologies (16). The present study confirmed the involvement of ITPR3 in HCC of patients with HCV, ALD and CC.

Together, two main molecular classes of HCC can be identified (46). The proliferation class, characterized by a higher availability of signals involved in cell cycle proliferation and cell cycle progression, as well as progenitor cell markers, is associated with a more aggressive clinical course. Such tumors have higher AFP levels, less cell differentiation and more frequent vascular invasion (47,48). These characteristics are in turn associated with greater chances of recurrence after initial treatment and lower survival rates (48,49). HCC from hepatitis B virus infection is mostly in this class (50). The non-proliferative class of HCC possesses at least two central molecular characteristics: A predominance of Wnt signaling in ≤25% of cases and an immune response in the remainder of cases; in the physiological context, the tumor transcriptome of this class is similar to normal liver physiology (50). From a clinical perspective, tumors in this class exhibit less aggressive characteristics, such as higher cell differentiation index and lower AFP levels. Regarding the underlying etiology, HCV and ALD-related HCC are more frequent in this class (48).

In the sample of the present study, the main CLD etiologies were HCV and ALD, with average AFP serum levels of 123.8 ng/ml, which is relatively low, as only levels above 400 ng/ml are considered as a threshold in the diagnosis of HCC (51). Regarding morphology, the tumor was well differentiated (grade I or II of Edmondson and Steiner score) in 72.9% of patients, the median nodule size was <3.0 cm and 62.8% of tumors had a low mitotic index. Taken together, these data indicated that the majority of the tumors in the present study would be classified as non-proliferative. Moreover, the tumor stage was not as advanced, which is compatible with some methods of treatment received; OLT is considered for patients fulfilling the Milan Criteria, as in our hospital: Hospital das Clínicas of the Federal University of Minas Gerais.

The prognostic importance of the mitotic index and tumor stage is appreciated in a number of malignancies (52,53). In addition, its value is similar to that of techniques such as nuclear antigen of cell proliferation (54) or DNA analysis (55,56). In the context of HCC, there is evidence that a high mitotic index is an unfavorable prognostic indicator (24,25,57,58), as well as an independent predictor of short-term survival in patients who undergo hepatectomy with curative intent (23). In addition, a high mitotic index (≥5/10 HPF is associated with intrahepatic metastasis, larger tumor size, higher AFP levels and advanced tumor stage (23,27), as well as vascular invasion (26), poor histological differentiation and high recurrence rate (23). In the samples in the present study, most patients (62.8%) had a low mitotic index (<5/10 HPF). This corroborated in vivo and in vitro studies which demonstrated that both HCV and ALD negatively affect cell cycle, promoting a G2/M phase arrest in HCC cell lines (59,60).

Demethylation of the promoter of the ITPR3 gene is necessary for its expression in hepatocytes and has been associated with cell proliferation in mouse livers after partial hepatectomy (PH) (16). The data of the present study showed that the higher the expression of ITPR3, the lower the mitotic index. These apparent discrepancies can be explained, in part, by the methodologies used in these studies (PCNA vs. mitotic index), as well as the type of samples analyzed (animal PH model vs. human HCC specimen). PCNA, used in the previous study, is known to serve an important role in the metabolism of nucleic acids and its main function is associated with DNA replication (61). However, PCNA may also be present in repair by DNA excision, cell cycle control, chromatin assembly and RNA transcription (61). Therefore, PCNA staining might also reflect cells in phases preceding mitosis. Another important factor is the type of sample used, either the PH model, in which hepatocytes are prompted to proliferate as a physiological process of the liver (62), or the liver with already established HCC. So, while previous work showed that ITPR3 stimulates hepatocyte proliferation and that its sustained expression in hepatocytes might lead to liver cancer (16), the findings of the current study supported a role for ITPR3 in the maintenance of the liver tumor by preventing cell death, rather than through enhanced hepatocyte proliferation.

It is known that liver growth involves apoptosis, both in physiological conditions, such as in regeneration (29) and in pathological situations, such as in HCC (16). Additionally, Ca2+ signaling through ITPR3 is part of apoptotic cell death (30) and the role of ITPR3 in carcinogenesis has been recently reviewed (63). ITPR3 can participate in both inhibiting and promoting apoptosis, depending on the type of tumor (16). The present study demonstrated an inverse correlation between apoptosis and liver tumor ITPR3 expression. This is consistent with a previous finding that ITPR3 triggers anti-apoptotic gene expression in HCC cell lines (16). Similarities occur in colon cancer cells, in which ITPR3 overexpression is associated with decreased apoptosis (18) and in hepatocytes infected with yellow fever virus, in which higher ITPR3 hepatocyte expression prevents cell death through apoptosis (14).

ITPR3 expression can induce resistance to cell death in liver cancer by increasing the expression of POU4F1 and decreasing SIAH2 in WT cells compared with HepG2 ITPR3KO (16). The present study extended these previous observations using RNA-seq and observed that more genes have their expression profile altered in relation to ITPR3 and, also, it is suggested that the signaling pathways associated with apoptosis resistance were altered in HepG2 ITPR3 KO cells (Fig. S1). In particular, a significant upregulation of CTSB, CHOP and GADD45 was observed, genes associated with either cell survival or apoptosis.

In the context of HCC, CHOP is pro-apoptotic (39), performing a pro-tumorigenic function, being an oncogene in hepatic carcinogenesis (39). CHOP is ubiquitously expressed at very low levels normally, but is strongly expressed in cells subjected to severe stress (64). However, activation of this gene is not universally observed in human HCC, which leads to the suggestion that there are other oncogenic pathways that promote hepatocarcinogenesis independently of CHOP. Thus, this gene may participate more in the progression of HCC rather than in its induction (39). The data from the present study suggested that the action of ITPR3 on CHOP expression was associated with the apoptotic signaling pathway by promoting maintenance of liver cancer development.

Growth arrest and damage to DNA 45 (GADD45) is a family composed of three homologous acidic proteins (α, β and γ) (65), which respond to cellular stresses of environmental and physiological origin (41). GADD45 proteins are also involved in hepatic tumorigenesis, in both carcinogenesis and established HCC (65). In the context of HCC, GADD45β has a pro-apoptotic action and occurs at a low or absent expression level in neoplastic cells, a specific characteristic of this type of tumor (41). This is critically correlated with fundamental clinical-pathological characteristics of tumor development (41). The synergistic effect of aspirin and sorafenib treatment induces an increase in GADD45β in HCC, promoting apoptosis and control of tumor growth (66), an opposite effect of growth in the non-neoplastic liver (65), reflecting the opposing effects of this gene depending on the biological context. GADD45β responses reflect its dynamics in rapid adaptations (65), being a possible diagnostic and selection biomarker for the treatment of HCC (66). These data suggest that the appearance of ITPR3 in liver cancer may promote tumor maintenance through the suppressive effect of GADD45 expression, especially of the β isoform.

The present study demonstrated the upregulation of important genes involved in the apoptotic pathway in liver cancer, such as GADD45 and CHOP. However, high-throughput technology would add stronger evidence. Thus, the absence of microarray experiments is a limitation of the present study.

In other types of neoplasms or liver diseases, ITPR3 can assume several roles. In prostate cancer, the mechanisms that promote the degradation of ITPR3 and prevent apoptosis have been elucidated (19). In ischemia-reperfusion injury, ITPR3 serves a protective role in which expression of the protein serves to change the mechanism of hepatocyte death from necrosis to apoptosis (15). This demonstrates the versatility that ITPR3 assumes within the varied contexts of different diseases and organs, but all associated with apoptotic events. It has been demonstrated that ITPR3 serves a role in proliferative stimulation and apoptosis block in liver cell lines and normal mouse liver (16). The current study provided evidence in human HCC samples that ITPR3 serves a role in hepatocarcinogenesis by modulating apoptosis. Additional work will be needed to better understand the mechanism by which de novo expression of ITPR3 correlates with mitosis and apoptosis in the pathogenesis of HCC, as well as whether this represents a potential target for therapy.

In conclusion, ITPR3 was highly expressed in HCC tumor cells relative to its expression level in the underlying CLD and healthy livers. ITPR3 expression was inversely correlated with apoptotic and mitotic indices in HCC, suggesting that ITPR3 contributed to the maintenance of HCC, promoting resistance to apoptosis. This resistance to apoptosis and alteration of tumor cell survival occurred, at least in part, through an intracellular signaling pathway in which ITPR3 demonstrated a negative effect on the expression of CHOP and GADD45, providing a reduction in apoptotic cell death. The expression of ITPR3 in the liver may be a promising prognostic marker of HCC and other types of liver cancer.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by grants from CNPq, FAPEMIG and NIH (grant nos. P01-DK57751, P30-DK34989, R01-DK114041 and R01-DK112797).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the Accession code PRJNA758563 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA758563). All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

The entire project was conducted, written and analyzed by MLDS, including carrying out the experiments. AF contributed in all aspects, mainly in the analysis and interpretation of data. RMF contributed with the assistance in carrying out the experiments, analysis and discussion of data and with the preparation of graphics and images. ACMLF contributed with the assistance in carrying out the experiments, analysis and discussion of data and with the preparation of graphics and images. PHD contributed to the statistical analysis and in the organization of the survival data. CAXG and VLC elaborated all the bioinformatics data, analysis and RNA-seq results. PVTV performed the mitotic cell count on the HCC samples in the tumor mitotic index experiment. In addition, PVTV helped to analyse and interpret the data in conjunction with the literature already published and was involved in the writing of the manuscript and in the critical review of important intellectual content. PVTV also helped with the construction of the data discussion. MFL participated in carrying out the experiments and articulating the data obtained from the works previously published by the group. FOL was involved in the writing of the manuscript and critical review of important intellectual content, and also contributed to the analysis of some of the data presented. MHN contributed to the analysis and discussion of the data in this study, in addition to approving the final version submitted for publication. GF participated in the orientation and design of the study, particularly in the contribution of immunohistochemical staining image analysis. CXL participated in the acquisition of clinical data from patients and in the interpretation of these data in conjunction with the results. MLDS and PVTV confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais (approval number CAAE 71206617.8.0000.5149) and written informed consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives, including for use of their tissue in the research.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

AFP

α fetoprotein

ALD

alcoholic liver disease

CAAE

Certificado de Apresentação de Apreciação Ética (Certificate of Presentation of Ethical Appreciation)

CC

cryptogenic cirrhosis

CHILD

CHILD-Pugh scores

CHOP

C/EBP homologous protein

CLD

chronic liver disease

CTSB

cathepsin B

EFS

event-free survival

H&E

hematoxylin and eosin

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV

hepatitis C virus

HepG2

immortalized liver cancer cell line

HPF

high-power fields

INR

international normalized ratio

ITPR

inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor

ITPR1

inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate type 1 receptor

ITPR2

inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate type 2 receptor

ITPR3

inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate type 3 receptor

MELD

model for end-stage liver disease

OLT

orthotopic liver transplantation

PH

partial hepactomy

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing

TBIL

total bilirubin

References

1 

Agni RM: Diagnostic histopathology of hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-based review. Semin Diagn Pathol. 34:126–137. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Forner A, Reig M and Bruix J: Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 391:1301–1314. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Bodzin AS, Lunsford KE, Markovic D, Harlander-Locke MP, Busuttil RW and Agopian VG: Predicting mortality in patients developing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: Impact of treatment modality and recurrence characteristics. Ann Surg. 266:118–125. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Villanueva A: Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 380:1450–1462. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Amaya MJ and Nathanson MH: Calcium signaling in the liver. Compr Physiol. 3:515–539. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Patel S, Joseph SK and Thomas AP: Molecular properties of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Cell Calcium. 25:247–264. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wojcikiewicz RJ: Type I, II, and III inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors are unequally susceptible to down-regulation and are expressed in markedly different proportions in different cell types. J Biol Chem. 270:11678–11683. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Yule DI, Ernst SA, Ohnishi H and Wojcikiewicz RJ: Evidence that zymogen granules are not a physiologically relevant calcium pool. Defining the distribution of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in pancreatic acinar cells. J Biol Chem. 272:9093–9098. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Cruz LN, Guerra MT, Kruglov E, Mennone A, Garcia CR, Chen J and Nathanson MH: Regulation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 by calcium signaling in mouse liver. Hepatology. 52:327–337. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Hirata K, Pusl T, O'Neill AF, Dranoff JA and Nathanson MH: The type II inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor can trigger Ca2+ waves in rat hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 122:1088–1100. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Dufour JF, Lüthi M, Forestier M and Magnino F: Expression of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms in rat cirrhosis. Hepatology. 30:1018–1026. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lemos FO, França A, Lima Filho ACM, Florentino RM, Santos ML, Missiaggia DG, Rodrigues GOL, Dias FF, Souza Passos IB, Teixeira MM, et al: Molecular mechanism for protection against liver failure in human yellow fever infection. Hepatol Commun. 4:657–669. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Lima Filho ACM, França A, Florentino RM, Dos Santos ML, de Oliveira Lemos F, Missiaggia DG, Fonseca RC, Gustavo Oliveira A, Ananthanarayanan M, Guerra MT, et al: Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3 plays a protective role in hepatocytes during hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cell Calcium. 91:1022642020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Leite MF, Thrower EC, Echevarria W, Koulen P, Hirata K, Bennett AM, Ehrlich BE and Nathanson MH: Nuclear and cytosolic calcium are regulated independently. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:2975–2980. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Guerra MT, Florentino RM, França A, Lima Filho AC, Dos Santos ML, Fonseca RC, Lemos FO, Fonseca MC, Kruglov E, Mennone A, et al: Expression of the type 3 InsP3 receptor is a final common event in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 68:1676–1687. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Ueasilamongkol P, Khamphaya T, Guerra MT, Rodrigues MA, Gomes DA, Kong Y, Wei W, Jain D, Trampert DC, Ananthanarayanan M, et al: Type 3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor is increased and enhances malignant properties in cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 71:583–599. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Shibao K, Fiedler MJ, Nagata J, Minagawa N, Hirata K, Nakayama Y, Iwakiri Y, Nathanson MH and Yamaguchi K: The type III inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor is associated with aggressiveness of colorectal carcinoma. Cell Calcium. 48:315–323. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kuchay S, Giorgi C, Simoneschi D, Pagan J, Missiroli S, Saraf A, Florens L, Washburn MP, Collazo-Lorduy A, Castillo-Martin M, et al: PTEN counteracts FBXL2 to promote IP3R3- and Ca2+-mediated apoptosis limiting tumour growth. Nature. 546:554–558. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Bononi A, Giorgi C, Patergnani S, Larson D, Verbruggen K, Tanji M, Pellegrini L, Signorato V, Olivetto F, Pastorino S, et al: BAP1 regulates IP3R3-mediated Ca2+ flux to mitochondria suppressing cell transformation. Nature. 546:549–553. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Fonseca MC, França A, Florentino RM, Fonseca RC, Lima Filho AC, Vidigal PT, Oliveira AG, Dubuquoy L, Nathanson MH and Leite MF: Cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains are needed for insulin signaling and proliferation in hepatic cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 315:G80–G94. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Baak JP: Mitosis counting in tumors. Hum Pathol. 21:683–685. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Ha SY, Choi M, Lee T and Park CK: The prognostic role of mitotic index in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy. Cancer Res Treat. 48:180–189. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Haratake J, Takeda S, Kasai T, Nakano S and Tokui N: Predictable factors for estimating prognosis of patients after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 72:1178–1183. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Nanashima A, Tanaka K, Yamaguchi H, Shibasaki S, Morino S, Yoshinaga M, Sawai T, Nakagoe T and Ayabe H: Fibrosis and inflammatory activity in noncancerous tissue and mitotic index of cancer tissue in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Relationship to clinicopathological factors and prognosis after hepatic resection. Dig Dis Sci. 48:1517–1522. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Osório FM, Vidigal PV, Ferrari TC, Lima AS, Lauar GM and Couto CA: Histologic grade and mitotic index as predictors of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Clin Transplant. 13:421–425. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Ouchi K, Sugawara T, Ono H, Fujiya T, Kamiyama Y, Kakugawa Y, Mikuni J, Yamanami H, Komatsu S and Horikoshi A: Mitotic index is the best predictive factor for survival of patients with resected hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Surg. 17:42–48. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Bolger AM, Lohse M and Usadel B: Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30:2114–2120. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA and Kingsford C: Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 14:417–419. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Howe KL, Achuthan P, Allen J, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Amode MR, Armean IM, Azov AG, Bennett R, Bhai J, et al: Ensembl 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49D:D884–D891. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Love MI, Huber W and Anders S: Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15:5502014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Kucukural A, Yukselen O, Ozata DM, Moore MJ and Garber M: DEBrowser: Interactive differential expression analysis and visualization tool for count data. BMC Genomics. 20:62019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Kanehisa M and Goto S: KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:27–30. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

UniProt Consortium: UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Resy. 49D:D480–D489. 2021.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Kanehisa M and Sato Y: KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci. 29:28–35. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Babicki S, Arndt D, Marcu A, Liang Y, Grant JR, Maciejewski A and Wishart DS: Heatmapper: Web-enabled heat mapping for all. Nucleic Acids Res. 44W:W147–W153. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Edmondson HA and Steiner PE: Primary carcinoma of the liver: A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer. 7:462–503. 1954. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ruan J, Zheng H, Rong X, Rong X, Zhang J, Fang W, Zhao P and Luo R: Over-expression of cathepsin B in hepatocellular carcinomas predicts poor prognosis of HCC patients. Mol Cancer. 15:172016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Scaiewicz V, Nahmias A, Chung RT, Mueller T, Tirosh B and Shibolet O: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous (CHOP) protein promotes carcinogenesis in the DEN-induced Hepatocellular carcinoma model. PLoS One. 8:e810652013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Liebermann DA and Hoffman B: Gadd45 in stress signaling. J Mol Signal. 3:152008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Qiu W, David D, Zhou B, Chu PG, Zhang B, Wu M, Xiao J, Han T, Zhu Z, Wang T, et al: Down-regulation of growth arrest DNA damage-inducible gene 45beta expression is associated with human hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 162:1961–1974. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Llovet JM, Peña CE, Lathia CD, Shan M, Meinhardt G and Bruix J; SHARP Investigators Study Group, : Plasma biomarkers as predictors of outcome in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 18:2290–2300. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Alves RC, Alves D, Guz B, Matos C, Viana M, Harriz M, Terrabuio D, Kondo M, Gampel O and Polletti P: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Review of targeted molecular drugs. Ann Hepatol. 10:21–27. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Ho DW, Lo RC, Chan LK and Ng IO: Molecular pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 5:290–302. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Lu LC, Hsu CH, Hsu C and Cheng AL: Tumor heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma: Facing the challenges. Liver Cancer. 5:128–138. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Hoshida Y, Nijman SM, Kobayashi M, Chan JA, Brunet JP, Chiang DY, Villanueva A, Newell P, Ikeda K, Hashimoto M, et al: Integrative transcriptome analysis reveals common molecular subclasses of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 69:7385–7392. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Chiang DY, Villanueva A, Hoshida Y, Peix J, Newell P, Minguez B, LeBlanc AC, Donovan DJ, Thung SN, Solé M, et al: Focal gains of VEGFA and molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 68:6779–6788. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Villanueva A, Hoshida Y, Battiston C, Tovar V, Sia D, Alsinet C, Cornella H, Liberzon A, Kobayashi M, Kumada H, et al: Combining clinical, pathology, and gene expression data to predict recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 140:1501–1512.e2. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Lee JS, Chu IS, Heo J, Calvisi DF, Sun Z, Roskams T, Durnez A, Demetris AJ and Thorgeirsson SS: Classification and prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling. Hepatology. 40:667–676. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Zucman-Rossi J, Villanueva A, Nault JC and Llovet JM: Genetic landscape and biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 149:1226–1239.e4. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Masuzaki R and Omata M: Screening program in high-risk populations. In: Hepatocellular Carcinoma. (2nd edition). Mcmasters KM and Vauthey JN: Springer. (New York, NY). 55–68. 2011.

52 

Bloom HJ and Richardson WW: Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer. 11:359–377. 1957. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Vang R, Shih IM and Kurman RJ: Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: Pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems. Adv Anat Patht. 16:267–282. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Suehiro T, Matsumata T, Itasaka H, Yamamoto K, Kawahara N and Sugimachi K: Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of resected hepatocellular carcinomas of varied sizes with special reference to proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Cancer. 76:399–405. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Okada S, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Yamasaki S, Sakamoto M and Hirohashi S: Predictive factors for postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 106:1618–1624. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Ruà S, Comino A, Fruttero A, Torchio P, Bouzari H, Taraglio S, Torchio B and Capussotti L: Flow cytometric DNA analysis of cirrhotic liver cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can provide a new prognostic factor. Cancer. 78:1195–1202. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Soini Y, Virkajärvi N, Lehto VP and Pääkkö P: Hepatocellular carcinomas with a high proliferation index and a low degree of apoptosis and necrosis are associated with a shortened survival. Br J Cancer. 73:1025–1030. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Tannapfel A, Geissler F, Köckerling F, Katalinic A, Hauss J and Wittekind C: Apoptosis and proliferation in relation to histopathological variables and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Pathol. 187:439–445. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Alisi A, Mele R, Spaziani A, Tavolaro S, Palescandolo E and Balsano C: Thr 446 phosphorylation of PKR by HCV core protein deregulates G2/M phase in HCC cells. J Cell Physiol. 205:25–31. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Clemens DL, Calisto LE, Sorrell MF and Tuma DJ: Ethanol metabolism results in a G2/M cell-cycle arrest in recombinant Hep G2 cells. Hepatology. 38:385–393. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Juríková M, Danihel L, Polák Š and Varga I: Ki67, PCNA, and MCM proteins: Markers of proliferation in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acta Histochem. 118:544–552. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Michalopoulos GK: Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Critical analysis of mechanistic dilemmas. Am J Pathol. 176:2–13. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Mangla A, Guerra MT and Nathanson MH: Type 3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor: A calcium channel for all seasons. Cell Calcium. 85:1021322020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Chikka MR, McCabe DD, Tyra HM and Rutkowski DT: C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) contributes to suppression of metabolic genes during endoplasmic reticulum stress in the liver. J Biol Chem. 288:4405–4415. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Tian J and Locker J: Gadd45 in the liver: Signal transduction and transcriptional mechanisms. In: Gadd45 Stress Sensor Genes. Liebermann DA and Hoffman B: Springer. (New York, NY). 69–80. 2013.

66 

Xia H, Lee KW, Chen J, Kong SN, Sekar K, Deivasigamani A, Seshachalam VP, Goh BKP, Ooi LL and Hui KM: Simultaneous silencing of ACSL4 and induction of GADD45B in hepatocellular carcinoma cells amplifies the synergistic therapeutic effect of aspirin and sorafenib. Cell Death Discov. 3:170582017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2022
Volume 23 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Dos Santos ML, França A, Lima Filho AC, Florentino RM, Diniz PH, Lemos FO, Gonçalves CA, Coelho VL, Lima CX, Foureaux G, Foureaux G, et al: Inositol 1,4,5‑trisphosphate receptor type 3 is involved in resistance to apoptosis and maintenance of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett 23: 32, 2022
APA
Dos Santos, M.L., França, A., Lima Filho, A.C., Florentino, R.M., Diniz, P.H., Lemos, F.O. ... Leite, M.F. (2022). Inositol 1,4,5‑trisphosphate receptor type 3 is involved in resistance to apoptosis and maintenance of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 23, 32. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13150
MLA
Dos Santos, M. L., França, A., Lima Filho, A. C., Florentino, R. M., Diniz, P. H., Lemos, F. O., Gonçalves, C. A., Coelho, V. L., Lima, C. X., Foureaux, G., Nathanson, M. H., Vidigal, P. V., Leite, M. F."Inositol 1,4,5‑trisphosphate receptor type 3 is involved in resistance to apoptosis and maintenance of human hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Letters 23.1 (2022): 32.
Chicago
Dos Santos, M. L., França, A., Lima Filho, A. C., Florentino, R. M., Diniz, P. H., Lemos, F. O., Gonçalves, C. A., Coelho, V. L., Lima, C. X., Foureaux, G., Nathanson, M. H., Vidigal, P. V., Leite, M. F."Inositol 1,4,5‑trisphosphate receptor type 3 is involved in resistance to apoptosis and maintenance of human hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Letters 23, no. 1 (2022): 32. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13150