Open Access

Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system invading and penetrating the skull: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Qiyan Lin
    • Jiabin Zhu
    • Xiaofeng Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 10, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13667
  • Article Number: 81
  • Copyright: © Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) of the central nervous system is a rare spindle cell tumor of mesenchymal origin. The present study reports the case of a 44‑year‑old male patient with SFT. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated that the majority of the intracranial tumors exhibited uneven low signals on T1‑weighted imaging (T1WI) and low mixed signals on T2WI, and there was an enhancement on enhanced scanning. Furthermore, the distal part of the left occipital lobe exhibited hypersignals on T1WI and T2WI, and this was significantly enhanced following enhanced scanning. The lower part of the scalp exhibited low signals on T1WI and high signals on T2WI, and there was no notable enhancement following enhanced scanning. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrated an elevated choline/creatine peak in the solid part of the tumor. Under the microscope, the tumor exhibited characteristic ‘staghorn‑shaped’ blood vessels. As SFT is difficult to differentially diagnose via imaging, immunohistochemical analysis of CD34, vimentin and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 was performed for the definitive diagnosis of SFT. Of note, surgical resection was the preferred treatment for SFT; however, due to the rarity of the tumor, subsequent adjuvant therapy and prognosis require further investigation.

Introduction

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare spindle cell tumor of mesenchymal origin, initially reported by Klempere and Rabin (1) in 1931. SFT is commonly found in the mediastinum and visceral pleura; however, it also occurs in the pleura external sites, such as the head and neck, pericardium, peritoneum, liver, thyroid, mesentery, and sinuses and orbits (2). Due to the lack of a true connective tissue component in the central nervous system (CNS), primary SFT of the CNS is rare, accounting for ~1% of all primary CNS tumors (3,4). Most CNS SFTs occur in the cranial cavity and just over one-fifth were intraspinal (57). Primary spinal SFT may occur at any age (5). The mean age of onset was 40.9 years for males and 35.0 years for females (5). There was no significant difference in morbidity between males and females (5). Primary spinal SFT usually occurs in the thoracic spinal cord, followed by the cervical and lumbar spinal cord, and the sacral spinal cord is rarely affected (5). Intracranial SFT occurs most commonly in adults aged 20–70 years, with similar incidence rates in males and females (8). When CNS SFTs occur intracranially, they are frequently extra-axially located (9,10). Hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) are also rare mesenchymal tumors that exhibit similar clinical, radiological and histological features to SFTs (11). The NGFI-A-binding protein (NAB2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) gene fusion was identified as a driver mutation of SFT (12,13). Previous pathological findings demonstrated that SFT and HPCs contain identical genetic abnormalities and these prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to classify the two tumor types as a new combined entity in 2016 (14). This classification described three grades of SFT/HPC, namely grade I, II and III. Of note, the distinction between the two types was no longer clinically significant due to the pronounced clinical and histopathological overlap. In the 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors, the term ‘hemangiopericytoma’ was removed and replaced with SFT (15).

A solid lesion located in the CNS distinct from fibrous meningioma, termed primary SFT, was initially reported by Carneiro et al (16) in 1996. Intracranially, SFT may occur at the cerebellopontine angle, spinal dura, parasagittal region, meninges and the intraventricular region (17). The present article reports on a 44-year-old male patient with SFT. The SFT originated from the superior sagittal sinus and not only penetrated through the skull, but also invaded the bilateral occipital lobes distally. This is the first case of SFT completely penetrating the skull, to the best of our knowledge. The imaging data, histopathological features and treatment of SFT were briefly reviewed and the imaging features of this case were discussed.

Case report

A 44-year-old male patient presented at the neurology outpatient clinic of Xiaolan People's Hospital of Zhongshan (Zhongshan, China) in August 2020 due to dizziness and blurred vision for one month. Neurological examination of the patient appeared normal; however, a visual field defect was observed below the central visual field of both eyes. Bone window computed tomography angiography (Ingenuity CT; Philips Medical Systems, Inc.; slice thickness, 0.8 mm; center, 450; width, 1,600) of the head demonstrated that the mass had invaded and penetrated the skull (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Preoperative and postoperative imaging profiles of the tumor. (A) The axial (left panel) and sagittal (right panel) images of the bone window of the head computed tomography angiogram demonstrated that the mass invaded and penetrated the skull. MRI on admission demonstrated a mass shadow near the occipital cerebral falx, with an irregular shape and unclear boundaries. The mass was ~64×44×64 mm in size. (B) The majority of the intracranial and subcutaneous tumors demonstrated uneven low signals on T1WI, while the tumors at the far end of the left occipital lobe demonstrated high signals on T1WI. (C) The majority of the intracranial tumors demonstrated low mixed signals on T2WI, while the tumors at the far end of the left occipital lobe and under the scalp demonstrated high signals on T2WI. (D) The axial (left panel) demonstrated that the tumor crossed both sides of the cerebral falx. There were unclear boundaries with the bilateral occipital lobe brain tissue. The majority of intracranial tumors and the tumors at the far end of the left occipital lobe were significantly enhanced following enhanced scanning, while the tumors under the scalp were not significantly enhanced following enhanced scanning. The sagittal (right panel) images of the contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated that tumors filled the posterior section of the superior sagittal sinus to form a filling defect, invading and penetrating the occipital bone. (E) The voxel (left panel) and corresponding magnetic resonance spectroscopy map (right panel) demonstrated no notable N-acetylaspartic acid peaks in the mass collected by multivoxel, elevated choline/creatine peaks in the solid area, and no notable abnormalities in the spectral lines of tissues around the mass. (F) Postoperative MRI demonstrated that the tumor was completely removed. The bilateral occipital lobes surrounding the surgical area demonstrated T1WI low signal (left panel) and T2WI high signal (second left panel), and the axial (second right panel) and sagittal (right panel) images of enhanced scanning demonstrated obvious enhancement along the edges of the surgical area. White arrows indicate the tumor. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; T1W1, T1-weighted imaging; T2W1, T2-weighted imaging.

Head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings demonstrated a mass shadow near the occipital cerebral falx, with an irregular shape and unclear boundaries. The mass was ~64×44×64 mm in size and stretched across both sides of the cerebral falx. The mass filled the posterior portion of the superior sagittal sinus to form a filling defect, invading and penetrating the occipital bone, and the boundary between the mass and bilateral occipital lobe brain tissue was unclear. Of note, the majority of the intracranial tumors exhibited uneven low signals on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and low mixed signals on T2WI, with notable enhancements following enhanced scanning. The distal part of the left occipital lobe demonstrated hypersignals on T1WI and T2WI, with significant enhancements following enhanced scanning. In addition, the lower part of the scalp exhibited low signals on T1WI and high signals on T2WI, and there were not notably enhanced following enhanced scanning (Fig. 1B-D).

Results of the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) demonstrated a multi voxel collection with no notable N-acetylaspartic acid peak in the mass. The choline/creatine peak in the solid area was increased; however, no notable abnormalities were found in the spectral lines of the tissues surrounding the mass (Fig. 1E).

A craniotomy was performed for tumor resection and follow-up MRI demonstrated complete tumor resection (Fig. 1F). During the operation, the tumor was gray and red in color with an abundant blood supply (Fig. S1A). Foci indicative of previous bleeding far from the origin occurred in the tumors in both the occipital lobe and the scalp. In addition, the tumor texture was uneven, with both soft and tough sections, with an incomplete capsule and lobulated invasive growth. The tumor broke through the brain tissue of the occipital lobe and the demarcation between the tumor and the brain tissue of the occipital lobe was unclear. The occipital pia mater was markedly edematous. The adjacent occipital skull demonstrated osteolytic bone destruction, the tumor penetrated the occipital bone to form a local mass under the scalp and the local scalp thickened reactively.

Pathological examination revealed that the tumor was composed of alternately distributed cell-rich areas and cell-sparse areas. The tumor cells in the cell-rich area were short-spindle or oval, with little cytoplasm and uniform nuclear chromatin. There was no notable atypia in the two areas. The frequency of mitotic figures was 1/10 high-power fields (HPF) and the tumor cells were arranged in sheets and striae. These were hemangiopericytoma-like, with abundant blood vessels in the tumor. Thus, these were labeled ‘staghorn-shaped blood vessels’ (Fig. 2A). Tumor cells presented with diffuse strong immunoreactivity to CD34, vimentin and STAT6 (Fig. 2B-D). The Ki-67 labeling index was ~10% with no signs of necrosis (Fig. 2E). The tumor cells presented as weakly positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and negativity for progesterone receptor (PR) (Fig. S1B and C). Grade I SFT cells are fusiform, with lower cell density and higher collagen content. Grade II SFT has more cells, less collagen, no specific cell arrangement and typical staghorn-shaped blood vessels. There are more than 4 mitotic figures per 10 HPF of grade III SFT (14). Intracranial SFT is mainly differentiated from meningioma because they are similar in clinical presentation and pathological diagnosis. The histopathological features of SFT are sparse and dense areas separated by fibrous stroma, with hemangiopericytoma branching vessels (18). The phenotype of SFT is characterized by a patternless architecture or a short fascicular pattern (14). SFT is histopathologically characterized by alternating low-cell and high-cell areas and thick collagen bands (14). Microscopically, the meningioma cells are nested, with abundant cytoplasm and unclear cells (syncytioid) (19). Pseudo-inclusions are common in meningioma nuclei, where cells have weakly defined cell boundaries (syncyti-like) (19). In SFT, STAT6 is positive in almost all patients, while CD34 is positive to varying degrees (2022). However, all forms of meningiomas characteristically expressed EMA and PR; CD34 reactivity was patchy and weak; STAT6 was not expressed (21,22). Histopathological examination confirmed WHO grade II SFT.

The protocols of the imaging examinations, histopathological staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are provided in the supplemental data.

Three-dimensional emphasis radiotherapy was performed 18 days after surgery [tumor absorbed dose: Planning target volume (PTV)1, 60.2 Gray/28 fractions; PTV2, 54.6 Gray/28 fractions]. At the follow-up 3 months after the surgery, the patient reported that the headache and dizziness symptoms had gradually disappeared after the surgery. The patient's visual field was examined using a Humphrey II 740 Visual Field (Carl Zeiss Meditec), indicating that the patient's visual field was significantly improved compared with that prior to surgery. During the two-year follow-up, the patient experienced no recurrence of SFT.

Discussion

The majority of intracranial SFTs are dural masses originating predominantly from thick collagen bands, which are produced by fibroblasts, most frequently occurring in the parasagittal sinus and spinal canal (3,2325). In the present study, the patient experienced SFT originating in the superior sagittal sinus, consistent with previous reports (3,2325).

Symptoms of SFT vary and patients may present with several non-specific symptoms associated with elevated intracranial pressure or tumor location. These include headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, gait disturbance, hemiplegia, hearing loss and memory disturbance (26).

Sugiyama et al (27) reported on an 86-year-old male with SFT, which was located in the right parietal lobe and invaded the parietal bone, who presented with sustained progressive motor weakness in the left lower extremity for 1 month. Another study reported on a 30-year-old male with SFT, which was located near the right temporal lobe and led to the thickening of the temporal bone of its neighbor; the patient developed left facial nerve paralysis and dysarthria, and decreased muscle strength of the left upper and lower limbs (28). SFT in the present case reported was located in the parietal occipital area and invaded and penetrated the skull and the patient presented with headache, dizziness and blurred vision. Headache and dizziness are mainly caused by increased intracranial pressure. Blurred vision is caused by a tumor pressing on the visual center. The patient of the present study had no symptoms of limb weakness, facial nerve paralysis or dysarthria.

The differential diagnosis of SFT via imaging is difficult due to its variable signal intensity on MRI scans (29). Differentiation from meningioma, schwannoma, neurofibroma, metastases and lymphoma was required (3033).

Computed tomography and MRI are important imaging techniques for the diagnosis of SFT. The medical imaging of intracranial SFT reveals numerous characteristics and previous imaging revealed that intracranial SFT is more likely to occur at the base of the skull (34), sagittal sinus (35), falx cerebri and peritentorium cerebelli (36), or near the venous sinus (37). In addition, intracranial SFT is characterized by extracranial tumors, which are lobular or irregular, and some may appear oval- or dumbbell-shaped (3840). Previous CT scans demonstrated high or equal density. The majority of boundaries were clear; however, a small number of the boundaries with the brain tissue were not clear (27,28,40,41). Cystic degeneration and necrosis in the tumor were common, but there was no calcification (27,28,40,41). The density of the tumor following necrosis and cystic degeneration was uneven and destruction of the skull adjacent to the tumor may occur (27,28,40,41). In general, SFT appears as isointense to slightly high on T1WI and isointense on T2WI, compared with gray matter. T1WI demonstrated isointense to slightly high signals (27,28,36) and isointense mixed signals (36) in the case of cystic degeneration and necrosis. In addition, T2WI demonstrated slightly high or isointense mixed signals (27,36), and isointense mixed signals in the case of cystic degeneration and necrosis (36). Following enhanced MRI scanning, the tumor appeared significantly strengthened, and those with cystic degeneration demonstrated heterogeneous enhancement (36,38,40,4244). Peritumoral edema is often mild (41,44,45).

The imaging findings of SFT were similar to those of meningioma and MRS may be used to distinguish SFT from meningioma. The relative ratios of choline and myo-inositol are increased in SFT compared with meningioma (40,46). Chen et al (47) also reported that the normalized apparent diffusion coefficient ratios and intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity are useful for differentiating SFT/HPC from meningioma. In the present case reported, SFT occurred near the cerebral falx. STF was irregular, exhibited unclear boundaries with the occipital lobe brain tissue, displayed notable enhancements in the intracranial section following enhanced scanning and exhibited an elevated choline peak in the MRS analysis, which was consistent with previous reports (40,46). SFT in the present case reported was located in the distal part of the left occipital lobe, demonstrated high signals on T1WI and T2WI, and was significantly enhanced following enhanced scanning. These results were also consistent with those previously reported (27,28,36,38,40,4244).

The majority of the intracranial tumors in the patient in the present report demonstrated uneven low signal intensity on T1WI and low mixed signal intensity on T2WI, which differed from the results obtained from previous reports. Due to the intraoperative situation, it was hypothesized that the tumor demonstrated low signal intensity on T1WI and T2WI due to intra-tumor hemorrhage. SFT may cause skull destruction when adjacent to the skull, which is manifested as hyperostosis, bone erosion or bone destruction (27,28,40,41,48). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SFT that completely penetrated the skull. The SFT signal penetrating the skull under the scalp demonstrated a low signal on T1WI and a high signal on T2WI, and no notable enhancements were observed following enhanced scanning. There was no notable enhancement of SFT under the scalp following enhanced scanning, which was also inconsistent with the results obtained from previous reports (36,38,40,4244). Thus, the tumor was considered heterogeneous. As tumor cells were dense, the interstitial components were relatively sparse with few vascular components. Of note, the sub-scalp tumor was not enhanced in the conventional enhancement time window. Thus, SFT under the scalp may require delayed enhancement for accurate development. In addition, for SFT located inside and outside the skull, and under the scalp, dynamic enhancement of multiple time windows is required in MRI to fully display the scope and nature of the tumor, and to avoid miscalculation.

The diagnosis of SFT mainly relies on pathological examination. Histological staining demonstrates that the tumor tissue is rich in spindle-shaped or polygonal cells. In typical cases, a large number of ‘staghorn-shaped’ blood vessels and collagen fibers may be observed. The tumor cells are arranged in concentric circles around the blood vessels, and these may form dense or sparse areas (49). IHC staining demonstrated that CD34, vimentin and STAT6 are positive in SFT tissues, and the Ki-67 proliferation index is frequently indicative of patient prognosis (50). Various studies recommended that high Ki-67 (>5%) should be included as an adverse prognostic parameter in assessing the prognosis of SFT of the CNS (7,51). At present, CD34 is considered the most consistent marker in SFT and positive staining is reported in 95–100% of patients; however, its absence does not rule out this tumor (52,53). STAT6 is positive in almost all patients with intracranial SFT (22,54). STAT6 may be associated with the fusion of the NAB2-STAT6 gene caused by 12q chromosome rearrangement (25). Thus, detection of STAT6 or the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene is recommended for the diagnosis of intracranial SFT (5456). NAB2 and STAT6 are neighbour genes localized on the long arm of chromosome 12 and transcribed in opposite directions (57). In SFT, an intrachromosomal inversion places the genes in the same orientation, which results in an in-frame fusion transcribed from the NAB2 promoter, leading to STAT6 nuclear expression that may be detected by IHC (14,57). The expression of STAT6 in intracranial SFT tissue was detected using IHC staining, and the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene was accurately detected with both high specificity and sensitivity (5456). STAT6 IHC is both a highly specific and sensitive surrogate for NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions, and the specificity and sensitivity of nuclear STAT6 for SFT/HPCs were 100 and 96.6%, respectively (20). In the present study, STAT6 expression was detected by IHC instead of detecting the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene. Different NAB2-STAT6 fusion variants may be related to clinical pathology and prognosis (12,5860). Therefore, the lack of NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene detection was a possible limitation of the present report. The SFT tissue of the patient described in the present study was positive for CD34, vimentin and STAT6, which was consistent with the results of previous reports (50,5254). The patient experienced no tumor recurrence following surgery.

SFT is characterized by high rates of local and extracranial metastases (61). Results of previous studies demonstrated that in patients with SFT for a prolonged period, there is a risk of recurrence, even after 10 years of the initial resection (6264). Therefore, patients with SFT require active treatment and long-term follow-up. As the tumor described in the present study is rare, treatment and prognosis require further investigation.

Yu et al (65) retrospectively studied patients treated for intracranial SFT between January 2009 and June 2019. Their results demonstrated reduced WHO grading, and patients who underwent gross total resection and adjuvant therapy, such as Gamma Knife surgery, exhibited prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (65). Of note, the aforementioned previous study was retrospective in nature, with a small sample size and selection bias, leading to biased results. Results of a multi-center study demonstrated that postoperative radiotherapy, including 2-dimensional conventional radiotherapy, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, may significantly improve the PFS of patients with SFT, irrespective of the surgical extent and grade (61). Of note, the present study did not investigate the effects of different radiotherapy techniques on SFT. At present, there are no standardized treatment guidelines for intracranial malignant SFT. Surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy are not effective in the treatment of intracranial malignant SFT. Anlotinib, a newly multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-neoplastic and anti-angiogenic activities, inhibits tumor angiogenesis and proliferation (66). Anti-angiogenesis may be a potential option for the treatment of SFT (6769). Surgery, radiotherapy and anlotinib alone are effective in the treatment of malignant intracranial SFT (13). However, the present article reports one case and further research and larger randomized controlled trials are required to verify its findings. Pazopanib, a multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent anti-angiogenic properties, is approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and certain subtypes of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (70). Of note, pazopanib is effective in treating patients with metastatic or unresectable SFT (69,71). The present study demonstrated that surgical resection is the optimal choice for the treatment of SFT, and postoperative radiotherapy may significantly improve PFS in patients. Molecular targeted therapy, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors anlotinib and pazopanib, is a promising approach for malignant, unresectable or metastatic SFT.

In conclusion, SFT is a rare tumor type. Due to the rarity and similarity to other more common brain tumors, SFTs exhibit a high rate of misdiagnosis following imaging. Of note, histopathological testing is critical for differentiating SFT from other CNS disorders. In addition, complete tumor resection is the preferred treatment option for SFT. The indications for adjuvant therapy following surgery remain to be elucidated. Due to the potential for recurrence, rigorous long-term follow-up, including periodic imaging surveillance, is recommended.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

QL and XZ designed the study and drafted the manuscript. JZ collected and analyzed the clinical data. XZ critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. QL and XZ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the present manuscript, including the medical data and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Klemperer P and Rabin CB: Primary neoplasms of the pleura. A report of five cases. Arch Pathol. 11:385–412. 1931.

2 

Goodlad JR and Fletcher CD: Solitary fibrous tumour arising at unusual sites: Analysis of a series. Histopathology. 19:515–522. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Wang Y and Zhang J, Liu Q, Liu F, Zhu X and Zhang J: Solitary fibrous tumor of the pineal region with delayed ectopic intracranial metastasis: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 98:e157372019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Shukla P, Gulwani HV, Kaur S and Shanmugasundaram D: Reappraisal of morphological and immunohistochemical spectrum of intracranial and spinal solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas with impact on long-term follow-up. Indian J Cancer. 55:214–221. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Wang L, Yu J, Shu D, Huang B, Wang Y and Zhang L: Primary endodermal hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor of the cervical spine: A case report and literature review. BMC Surg. 21:4052021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Apra C, El Arbi A, Montero AS, Parker F and Knafo S: Spinal solitary fibrous tumors: An original multicenter series and systematic review of presentation, management, and prognosis. Cancers (Basel). 14:28392022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bisceglia M, Galliani C, Giannatempo G, Lauriola W, Bianco M, D'angelo V, Pizzolitto S, Vita G, Pasquinelli G, Magro G and Dor DB: Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system: A 15-year literature survey of 220 cases (August 1996-July 2011). Adv Anat Pathol. 18:356–392. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Thway K, Ng W, Noujaim J, Jones RL and Fisher C: The current status of solitary fibrous tumor: Diagnostic features, variants, and genetics. Int J Surg Pathol. 24:281–292. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Marcó Del Pont F, Ries Centeno T, Villalonga JF, Giovannini SJM, Caffaratti G, Lorefice E and Cervio A: Results in the treatment of intracranial hemangiopericytomas. Case series. Neurocirugia (Astur: Engl Ed). 32:62–68. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Claus E, Seynaeve P, Ceuppens J, Vanneste A and Verstraete K: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor. J Belg Soc Radiol. 101:112017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zeng L, Wang Y, Wang Y, Han L, Niu H, Zhang M, Ke C, Chen J and Lei T: Analyses of prognosis-related factors of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors and hemangiopericytomas help understand the relationship between the two sorts of tumors. J Neurooncol. 131:153–161. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Barthelmeß S, Geddert H, Boltze C, Moskalev EA, Bieg M, Sirbu H, Brors B, Wiemann S, Hartmann A, Agaimy A and Haller F: Solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas with different variants of the NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion are characterized by specific histomorphology and distinct clinicopathological features. Am J Pathol. 184:1209–1218. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Zhang DY, Su L and Wang YW: Malignant solitary fibrous tumor in the central nervous system treated with surgery, radiotherapy and anlotinib: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 10:631–642. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P and Ellison DW: The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131:803–820. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins C, Ng HK, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G, et al: The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Neuro Oncol. 23:1231–1251. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Carneiro SS, Scheithauer BW, Nascimento AG, Hirose T and Davis DH: Solitary fibrous tumor of the meninges: A lesion distinct from fibrous meningioma. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Am J Clin Pathol. 106:217–224. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Hu SW, Tsai KB, Yang SF, Lee KS and Chai CY: Unusual solitary fibrous tumors in the central nervous system: A report of two cases. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 21:179–184. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Huang SC and Huang HY: Solitary fibrous tumor: An evolving and unifying entity with unsettled issues. Histol Histopathol. 34:313–334. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Buerki RA, Horbinski CM, Kruser T, Horowitz PM, James CD and Lukas RV: An overview of meningiomas. Future Oncol. 14:2161–2177. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Li Q, Zhang C and Li Z: Delayed pulmonary metastasis and recurrence of intracranial malignant solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: Case report and literature review. Oncol Lett. 24:2552022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Perry A, Scheithauer BW and Nascimento AG: The immunophenotypic spectrum of meningeal hemangiopericytoma: A comparison with fibrous meningioma and solitary fibrous tumor of meninges. Am J Surg Pathol. 21:1354–1360. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Macagno N, Figarella-Branger D, Mokthari K, Metellus P, Jouvet A, Vasiljevic A, Loundou A and Bouvier C: Differential diagnosis of meningeal SFT-HPC and meningioma: Which immunohistochemical markers should be used? Am J Surg Pathol. 40:270–278. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Bertero L, Anfossi V, Osella-Abate S, Disanto MG, Mantovani C, Zenga F, Rudà R, Garbossa D, Soffietti R, Ricardi U, et al: Pathological prognostic markers in central nervous system solitary fibrous tumour/hemangiopericytoma: Evidence from a small series. PLoS One. 13:e02035702018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Keraliya AR, Tirumani SH, Shinagare AB, Zaheer A and Ramaiya NH: Solitary fibrous tumors: 2016 Imaging update. Radiol Clin North Am. 54:565–579. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Kim BS, Kim Y, Kong DS, Nam DH, Lee JI, Suh YL and Seol HJ: Clinical outcomes of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor and hemangiopericytoma: Analysis according to the 2016 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors. J Neurosurg. 129:1384–1396. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wang XQ, Zhou Q, Li ST, Liao CL, Zhang H and Zhang BY: Solitary fibrous tumors of the central nervous system: Clinical features and imaging findings in 22 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 37:658–665. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Sugiyama H, Tsutsumi S, Hashizume A, Inaba T and Ishii H: Are bone erosion and peripheral feeding vessels hallmarks of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma? Radiol Case Rep. 17:2702–2707. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chikasue T, Uchiyama Y, Tanoue S, Komaki S, Sugita Y and Abe T: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma mimicking cystic meningioma: A case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep. 16:1637–1642. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kim JH, Yang KH, Yoon PH and Kie JH: Solitary fibrous tumor of central nervous system: A case report. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 3:127–131. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Liu X, Deng J, Sun Q, Xue C, Li S, Zhou Q, Huang X, Liu H and Zhou J: Differentiation of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from atypical meningioma using apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 45:2449–2456. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Yue X, Huang J, Zhu Y and Du Y: Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma in the cerebellopontine angle mimicking vestibular schwannoma: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 99:e196512020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Mondal SK, Mallick MG, Bandyopadhyay R and Mondal PK: Neurofibroma of kidney: An uncommon neoplasm and diagnostic dilemma with solitary fibrous tumor. J Cancer Res Ther. 6:388–390. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Smith AB, Horkanyne-Szakaly I, Schroeder JW and Rushing EJ: From the radiologic pathology archives: Mass lesions of the dura: Beyond meningioma-radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 34:295–312. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Peng Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Fang Y, Fan R, Zhang H and Jiang W: Hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor of the cranial base: A case series and literature review. BMC Surg. 22:2892022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Kalani MY, Martirosyan NL, Eschbacher JM, Nakaji P, Albuquerque FC and Spetzler RF: Large hemangiopericytoma associated with arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulae. World Neurosurg. 76:592.e7–e10. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Bai LC, Luo TY, Zhu H and Xu R: MRI features of intracranial anaplastic hemangiopericytoma. Oncol Lett. 13:2945–2948. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Chen Z, Ye N, Jiang N, Yang Q, Wanggou S and Li X: Deep learning model for intracranial hemangiopericytoma and meningioma classification. Front Oncol. 12:8395672022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ma L, Wang L, Fang X, Zhao CH and Sun L: Diagnosis and treatment of solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma of central nervous system. Retrospective report of 17 patients and literature review. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 39:88–94. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Yi X, Xiao D, He Y, Yin H, Gong G, Long X, Liao W, Li X, Sun L, Zhang Y and Zhang B: Spinal solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: A clinicopathologic and radiologic analysis of eleven cases. World Neurosurg. 104:318–329. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Clarençon F, Bonneville F, Rousseau A, Galanaud D, Kujas M, Naggara O, Cornu P and Chiras J: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor: Imaging findings. Eur J Radiol. 80:387–394. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Al Armashi AR, Alkrekshi A, Al Zubaidi A, Somoza-Cano FJ, Hammad F, Elantably D, Patell K and Ravakhah K: Grade III solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: An enthralling intracranial tumor-A case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep. 17:3792–3796. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Liu Y, Wang Q, Zhang T, Yang L and Liang WJ: MR imaging of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor: A retrospective study of 7 cases. Afr Health Sci. 18:799–806. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Zhang Z, Li Y, She L, Wang X, Yan Z, Sun S, Antony A and Zhang H: A footprint-like intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma with extracranial extension and acute intratumoral hemorrhage. J Craniofac Surg. 31:e682–e685. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Zhou JL, Liu JL, Zhang J and Zhang M: Thirty-nine cases of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and anaplastic hemangiopericytoma: A retrospective review of MRI features and pathological findings. Eur J Radiol. 81:3504–3510. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

He L, Li B, Song X and Yu S: Signal value difference between white matter and tumor parenchyma in T1- and T2-weighted images may help differentiating solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 198:1062212020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Ohba S, Murayama K, Nishiyama Y, Adachi K, Yamada S, Abe M, Hasegawa M and Hirose Y: Clinical and radiographic features for differentiating solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from meningioma. World Neurosurg. 130:e383–e392. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Chen T, Jiang B, Zheng Y, She D, Zhang H, Xing Z and Cao D: Differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology. 62:175–184. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Nagai Yamaki V, de Souza Godoy LF, Alencar Bandeira G, Tavares Lucato L, Correa Lordelo G, Fontoura Solla DJ, Santana Neville I, Jacobsen Teixeira M and Silva Paiva W: Dural-based lesions: Is it a meningioma? Neuroradiology. 63:1215–1225. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Sun LJ, Dong J, Gao F, Chen DM, Li K, Liu J, Zhang C, Tohti M and Yang XP: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor: Report of two cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 98:e153272019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Zuo Z, Zhou H, Sun Y, Mao Q, Zhang Y and Gao X: Rapidly growing solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura: A case report and review of the literature. Ann Transl Med. 8:8902020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Macagno N, Vogels R, Appay R, Colin C and Mokhtari K; French CNS SFT/HPC Consortium; Dutch CNS SFT/HPC Consortium, . Küsters B, Wesseling P, Figarella-Branger D, et al: Grading of meningeal solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas: analysis of the prognostic value of the marseille grading system in a cohort of 132 patients. Brain Pathol. 29:18–27. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Vogels RJ, Vlenterie M, Versleijen-Jonkers YM, Ruijter E, Bekers EM, Verdijk MA, Link MM, Bonenkamp JJ, van der Graaf WT, Slootweg PJ, et al: Solitary fibrous tumor-clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of 28 cases. Diagn Pathol. 9:2242014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Davanzo B, Emerson RE, Lisy M, Koniaris LG and Kays JK: Solitary fibrous tumor. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 3:942018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Yamashita D, Suehiro S, Kohno S, Ohue S, Nakamura Y, Kouno D, Ohtsuka Y, Nishikawa M, Matsumoto S, Bernstock JD, et al: Intracranial anaplastic solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: Immunohistochemical markers for definitive diagnosis. Neurosurg Rev. 44:1591–1600. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Chenhui Z, He G, Wu Z, Rong J, Ma F, Wang Z, Fang J, Gao W, Song H, Zhang F, et al: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytomas: A clinical analysis of a series of 17 patients. Br J Neurosurg. 1–8. 2021.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Sahoo N, Mohapatra D, Panigrahi S, Lenka A, Das P and Mohapatra SS: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: A clinicoradiological poorly recognized entity-an institutional experience. Turk Neurosurg. Nov 19–2020.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Georgiesh T, Namløs HM, Sharma N, Lorenz S, Myklebost O, Bjerkehagen B, Meza-Zepeda LA and Boye K: Clinical and molecular implications of NAB2-STAT6 fusion variants in solitary fibrous tumour. Pathology. 53:713–719. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Akaike K, Kurisaki-Arakawa A, Hara K, Suehara Y, Takagi T, Mitani K, Kaneko K, Yao T and Saito T: Distinct clinicopathological features of NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene variants in solitary fibrous tumor with emphasis on the acquisition of highly malignant potential. Hum Pathol. 46:347–356. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Huang SC, Li CF, Kao YC, Chuang IC, Tai HC, Tsai JW, Yu SC, Huang HY, Lan J, Yen SL, et al: The clinicopathological significance of NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in 52 cases of intrathoracic solitary fibrous tumors. Cancer Med. 5:159–168. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Tai HC, Chuang IC, Chen TC, Li CF, Huang SC, Kao YC, Lin PC, Tsai JW, Lan J, Yu SC, et al: NAB2-STAT6 fusion types account for clinicopathological variations in solitary fibrous tumors. Mod Pathol. 28:1324–1335. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Lee JH, Jeon SH, Park CK, Park SH, Yoon HI, Chang JH, Suh CO, Kang SJ, Lim DH, Kim IA, et al: The role of postoperative radiotherapy in intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study (KROG 18-11). Cancer Res Treat. 54:65–74. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Sonabend AM, Zacharia BE, Goldstein H, Bruce SS, Hershman D, Neugut AI and Bruce JN: The role for adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of hemangiopericytoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. J Neurosurg. 120:300–308. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Vuorinen V, Sallinen P, Haapasalo H, Visakorpi T, Kallio M and Jääskeläinen J: Outcome of 31 intracranial haemangiopericytomas: Poor predictive value of cell proliferation indices. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 138:1399–1408. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Guthrie BL, Ebersold MJ, Scheithauer BW and Shaw EG: Meningeal hemangiopericytoma: Histopathological features, treatment, and long-term follow-up of 44 cases. Neurosurgery. 25:514–522. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Yu Y, Hu Y, Lv L, Chen C, Yin S, Jiang S and Zhou P: Clinical outcomes in central nervous system solitary-fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: A STROBE-compliant single-center analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 20:1492022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Shen G, Zheng F, Ren D, Du F, Dong Q, Wang Z, Zhao F, Ahmad R and Zhao J: Anlotinib: A novel multi-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor in clinical development. J Hematol Oncol. 11:1202018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Maruzzo M, Martin-Liberal J, Messiou C, Miah A, Thway K, Alvarado R, Judson I and Benson C: Pazopanib as first line treatment for solitary fibrous tumours: The Royal Marsden Hospital experience. Clin Sarcoma Res. 5:52015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Ebata T, Shimoi T, Bun S, Miyake M, Yoshida A, Shimomura A, Noguchi E, Yonemori K, Shimizu C, Fujiwara Y, et al: Efficacy and safety of pazopanib for recurrent or metastatic solitary fibrous tumor. Oncology. 94:340–344. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Martin-Broto J, Stacchiotti S, Lopez-Pousa A, Redondo A, Bernabeu D, de Alava E, Casali PG, Italiano A, Gutierrez A, Moura DS, et al: Pazopanib for treatment of advanced malignant and dedifferentiated solitary fibrous tumour: A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20:134–144. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Schutz FA, Choueiri TK and Sternberg CN: Pazopanib: Clinical development of a potent anti-angiogenic drug. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 77:163–171. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Martin-Broto J, Cruz J, Penel N, Le Cesne A, Hindi N, Luna P, Moura DS, Bernabeu D, de Alava E, Lopez-Guerrero JA, et al: Pazopanib for treatment of typical solitary fibrous tumours: A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 21:456–466. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2023
Volume 25 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lin Q, Zhu J and Zhang X: Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system invading and penetrating the skull: A case report. Oncol Lett 25: 81, 2023
APA
Lin, Q., Zhu, J., & Zhang, X. (2023). Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system invading and penetrating the skull: A case report. Oncology Letters, 25, 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13667
MLA
Lin, Q., Zhu, J., Zhang, X."Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system invading and penetrating the skull: A case report". Oncology Letters 25.2 (2023): 81.
Chicago
Lin, Q., Zhu, J., Zhang, X."Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system invading and penetrating the skull: A case report". Oncology Letters 25, no. 2 (2023): 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13667