Open Access

Coronavirus disease‑2019 (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Ying Shu
    • Hui He
    • Xiang Shi
    • Yan Lei
    • Jingping Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 11, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.83
  • Article Number: 12
  • Copyright: © Shu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

From the end of 2019, an ongoing outbreak of a new type of unexplained pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2), was first identified in Wuhan, China. Since then, it has spread to most parts of China and worldwide, thus affecting the health of individuals worldwide. Until August 2020, >25 million cases of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection had been confirmed worldwide, causing >800,000 deaths. This disease was named by the World Health Organization as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19). Similar to SARS and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, which are also caused by coronavirus infections, COVID‑19 mainly causes severe respiratory system damage; however, it also causes damage to multiple organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, the cardiovascular system and the nervous system. The main aim of the present review article was to summarize the current knowledge of COVID‑19, such as the transmission process, diagnostic methods, pathological characteristics, potential pathogenic mechanisms and treatment measures.

1. Introduction

A large-scale novel type of pneumonia, caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), began in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, and it has affected numerous countries and regions worldwide as of early June, 2020. The outbreak of COVID-19 was caused by a coronavirus infection, similar to the prior infectious disease outbreaks Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) (1,2). According to the current epidemiological analysis, COVID-19 may be far more infectious compared with SARS-CoV, while it has been reported that this virus is transmitted by humans, albeit with weaker pathogenicity than SARS-CoV (3,4). To this end, governments worldwide have adopted strict measures for the isolation and control of the disease in order to prevent its further large-scale spread, including the lockdown of cities, the isolation of suspected populations and the establishment of new COVID-19 treatment hospitals (5). However, this virus still poses a serious threat to human health. Currently, in addition to numerous epidemiological studies gradually revealing the possible origin, transmission routes and characteristics of COVID-19, several preliminary studies have investigated the histopathological changes, potential pathogenesis and treatment approaches for COVID-19. The results of these studies may provide an important theoretical basis for the understanding and prevention of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, an in-depth study of COVID-19 by scientists of different specialties worldwide may gradually lead to the elucidation of the pathophysiology of the disease.

2. Transmission and origin

The World Health Organization (WHO) officially named the novel coronavirus pneumonia as COVID-19(6). On December 30, 2019, the Wuhan Health Commission of China issued an emergency notice stating that patients with pneumonia of unknown origin were admitted to various hospitals in the country, which immediately attracted the attention of the Chinese government, which in turn appointed relevant experts to investigate and analyze this newly identified type of pneumonia. It was finally confirmed that this type of pneumonia was caused by a virus. Based on information obtained from patients, it was initially considered that this virus could have originated from the Wuhan HuaNan Seafood Market. Chinese scholars gradually realized that the virus was rapidly spreading among humans (3). The number of infected individuals significantly increased within a short period of time, and pneumonia cases were first reported outside China in mid-January, 2020. At the end of January, 2020, the Chinese government imposed stricter measures in order to prevent the epidemic from spreading further, and organized the country's resources in the fight against this novel coronavirus-associated pneumonia. In mid-to-late February, 2020, the number of new pneumonia cases was gradually declining in China, while the number of patients discharged from hospital was gradually increasing. In early March, with the exception of Wuhan, the number of suspicious infections in China stabilized, and the epidemic was considered to be effectively controlled. However, the COVID-19 outbreak is significantly more severe compared with the previous SARS outbreak. By August, 2020, according to the report of the Health Commission (7), the total number of COVID-19 infection cases in China exceeded 90,000, with >4,700 deaths. Although this disease has had a relatively serious negative impact on the Chinese population, this was markedly restricted due to the successful strict measures imposed by the Chinese government.

As regards countries other than China, Thailand confirmed the first imported case of COVID-19 as early as January, 2020(8). By February, 2020, 24 countries globally had reported confirmed cases of COVID-19(9). Due to the initial lack of awareness regarding the novel coronavirus-mediated pneumonia, the number of cases in several countries rapidly increased. As of August, 2020, the United States of America was the country with the highest total number of confirmed cases (>6 million cases), while Brazil was the country with highest number of confirmed cases per day (>50,000 cases). As regards Asia, India had >3 million individuals diagnosed with COVID-19, while ~1 million cases were confirmed in Russia. Ιn the African continent, a total of 57 countries reported >1 million confirmed cases. At the time of the writing of the present review article, 13 countries in Africa had reported >10,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19, among which South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria were shown to have a markedly increased incidence of the disease (Fig. 1).

The similarity comparison and mutation site analysis of the COVID-19 genome, obtained from the 2019 novel coronavirus resource library released by the National Genomics Scientific Data Center, revealed that the sequence similarity between SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and SARS-CoV, responsible for the 2003 outbreak, was 80%, whereas it was ~50% for MERS-CoV. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 was clustered with SARS-CoVs in the phylogenetic tree of SARS-related coronaviruses (10-12). SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the ‘Coronavirus’ family, the ‘β-coronavirus’ genus, and the ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus’ species, which also includes SARS-CoV (13). Based on currently available analyses, the COVID-19 appears to be more infectious than SARS-CoV (3). In addition, it has been reported that COVID-19 exhibits the highest similarity (88%) with the genomic sequence of bat-isolated SARS-like coronavirus (bat-SL-CoVZC45). Bat-SL-CoVZC45 was first isolated from domestic bats in February, 2017 (14,15). Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 is also closely associated with a type of coronavirus isolated from bats, namely RaGT13-CoV, with a nucleotide identity of 96%, thus indicating that SARS-CoV-2 may have also originated from bats. However, whether SARS-CoV-2 was transmitted directly from bats to humans or through intermediate hosts remains unclear (16). Some studies have suggested that pangolins may also be the host of SARS-CoV-2. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 encompasses a unique peptide (PRRA) insertion; however, this element is lacking from the pangolin-carried coronavirus (17). Therefore, further in-depth research into the identification of the virus hosts may provide the necessary knowledge for preventing these diseases.

3. Diagnosis

In the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, accurate and rapid diagnostic tests are crucial for the detection of COVID-19 infection. With the identification of the COVID-19 virus sequence, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis and gene sequencing have been recommended for the diagnosis of COVID-19(18). However, due to the urgency of the epidemic and since gene sequencing is a time-consuming method, this approach is less frequently adopted. Currently, the most commonly used clinical diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are divided into 3 categories: Molecular testing for the detection of viral RNA (RT-qPCR); serological testing for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins; and computed tomography (CT). Several manufacturers have developed and produced different diagnostic kits for COVID-19, and have gradually optimized the detection efficiency and detection time. The virus is mainly detected in throat swabs, sputum, alveolar lavage fluid, serum and plasma (19).

RT-qPCR, used to detect viral RNA, is considered as the ‘standard diagnostic tool’. A disadvantage of RT-qPCR testing is the risk of false-negative and false-positive results. Emerging evidence has suggested that SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by genetic diversity and rapid evolution. Therefore, the results of RT-qPCR using primers for different genes may be affected by changes in the viral RNA sequence (20,21). Although RT-qPCR assays are designed to be as accurate as possible based on the conserved regions of the viral genome, genome variability may cause mismatches between the primer/probes and the target sequences may lead to decreased accuracy and potential false-negative results (22). The kinetics of the viral load may also lead to false-negative results to a large extent. Currently, rapid and efficient nasal and throat swabs are recommended for sample collection (23). The Coronavirus Standards Working Group (https://jimb.stanford.edu/covid-19-standards) led by the Joint Biometrics Project has developed a set of guidelines to ensure the accuracy of the diagnostic test results (24).

Compared with tests using nucleic acid, serological testing requires less technical knowledge and equipment, and is considered as an easy method to perform. The majority of serological assays are based on SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N), transmembrane spike protein (S) or S receptor-binding domain (RBD), due to their high antigenicity (25,26). The spike (S) protein on the surface of the virus mediates the adhesion of the virus to human respiratory cells through its RBD, which, in turn, promotes the fusion of the virus with the cell membrane. A previous study demonstrated that individuals who were not exposed to SARS-CoV-2 had no spike protein at all, and their serum samples showed little or no response in ELISA (27). In another study, the seroconversion of IgM and IgG occurred simultaneously or sequentially, and the median interval for seroconversion for both immunoglobulins was 13 days following the onset of COVID-19, and 19 days report the onset of symptoms (28). Additionally, the IgG seroconversion rate reached 100%, and the sensitivity test range for IgM and IgG was between 72.7 and 100%, while the specificity range was between 98.7 and 100%, respectively. When IgM/IgG ELISA was combined with PCR, the detection rate was significantly improved compared with PCR alone (98.6 vs. 51.9%) (29,30). However, serological tests are affected by several factors, such as specimens, reagents and operations; therefore, false-negative results may occur, affecting the clinical treatment and prevention of the infection.

CT examination is also an important method (31,32), which may help clarify the false-negative results in the detection of COVID-19 obtained by PCR and serological examinations. During or outside the COVID-19 incubation period, a CT scan of infected patients may reveal some characteristic lesions in their lungs that are indicative of infection. The most common chest CT manifestation is bilateral ground-glass opacity (GGO) (33). This is defined as a hazy area in the lung that exhibits a slight increase in density, without blurring of the edges of the bronchi and blood vessels, which is caused by the partial displacement of air promoted by the partial filling of the alveolar cavity or the thickening of the gap (34). The presence of GGO usually indicates pulmonary edema or hyaline membrane formation (33). In addition, the lung CT examination of patients with COVID-19 may also reveal a reticular pattern, crazy paving pattern and the air bubble sign (35-37). The pathological fluid covers the edges of the underlying blood vessels and airway walls and increases the density of the lung parenchyma, which is referred to as consolidation (38). In patients with COVID-19, consolidation may be associated with cellulose and mucus exudates in alveolar cells (39). It was recently reported that consolidation is considered a sign of disease progression, while GGO in a lung CT scan is considered as an early finding of SARS-CoV-2 infection (40). GGO may evolve into consolidation after 1-3 weeks (33). In patients with severe COVID-19 infection, multifocal or large-area sheet consolidation may appear in the lungs, which is characterized by large white areas on lung CT images, also referred to as ‘white lungs’ (41). All the aforementioned detection techniques are associated with shortcomings; therefore, in order to improve the detection rate of COVID-19, clinicians may opt to use a combination of these methods. Patients with ‘white lungs’ are usually infected within their familiar environment and, although they may not have been tested or tested negative for COVID-19 by RT-qPCR analysis, some researchers refer to such patients as ‘clinical diagnostic cases’. Although these patients are not really confirmed cases, they are recorded as confirmed or suspected cases, requiring high caution and immediate isolation (42).

4. Pathology and mechanisms

Understanding the pathological changes of the disease is a prerequisite for its treatment. A pathological examination of the lungs of patients with COVID-19 revealed that the lung tissue was grossly affected by diffuse congestion and partial necrosis, while the bronchi were lined with a large amount of mucus and exudate (43-47). Microscopic analysis also revealed extensive hemorrhage, infarction, pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, extensive type I alveolar epithelial cell damage and atypical proliferation of type II alveolar cells, hyaline membrane formation, exudation, pulmonary edema and consolidation. Additionally, a large number of inflammatory cells, including lymphocytes and plasma cells, infiltrated the lung tissue, while increased vascular proliferation was also observed. Several studies have also reported other characteristics of the lungs of patients with COVID-19, such as the loss and squamous metaplasia of alveolar epithelial cells and a large amount of cellulose-like exudate in the alveoli. Other pathological analyses demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 exhibited structural damage to the lung tissue and a large amount of mucus and exudate blocking the airway lumen and alveoli, thus leading to severe respiratory failure and insufficient spontaneous breathing. Therefore, for patients with severe COVID-19, even the use of extracorporeal assisted ventilation is ineffective. The primary function of the lungs is to rely on normal physiological movements to maintain the body's normal oxygen supply based on the inhalation and discharge of oxygen or carbon dioxide (43-47). Varga et al reported for the first time that patients with COVID-19 exhibited endothelial cell damage in multiple organs, including the heart, kidney, lung and small intestine, thus indicating that SARS-CoV-2 infection may facilitate the induction of endotheliitis, apoptosis and pyroptosis in several organs, as a direct consequence of the host's inflammatory response (48). Necrotic lymphocyte infiltration, interstitial edema and fibrosis have also been found in the gastrointestinal tract (49), kidneys (50) and liver (51) of patients, while axonal damage has been observed in brain nerve cells (52). Furthermore, in several patients, COVID-19 has been found to be accompanied by viral rashes and vascular endodermatitis of the skin and blood vessels, respectively (48,53). The aforementioned reports indicate that lung injury is the most common lesion of COVID-19; however, the damage is not limited to the lungs, suggesting that COVID-19 is a systemic disease characterized by multiorgan injury.

It has been reported that the cytokine storm (54) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) may be the potential mechanisms underlying the aforementioned pathological changes (5,55). The overactive immune responses of the host against the SARS-CoV-2-infection may lead to excessive and aggressive inflammatory responses, eventually leading to the release of a large amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines, a process referred to as cytokine storm (56). As regards the innate immune responses following virus infection, the pattern recognition receptor (PRR) recognizes the conserved molecular structures of the invading virus, namely the pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). The combination of PAMP and PRR triggers the activation of a variety of signaling pathways and transcription factors, which in turn induce the expression of several genes associated with the immune responses against viral infections, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines (56,57). Macrophages, dendritic cells, endothelial cells, natural killer cells and T and B lymphocytes are the main immune cell subtypes responsible for the secretion of cytokines. In addition, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, chemokines and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are mainly involved in the inflammatory responses (58). The normal and adequate release of cytokines is necessary for the human body to be able to resist against various pathogens. In patients with COVID-19, the balance of the secreted cytokines is disrupted. Therefore, the increased secretion of cytokines within a short period of time may cause damage to tissue endothelial cells, blood vessels and alveoli and, may eventually, lead to organ failure (15,56).

ACE-2 is expressed on bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells, and it is also widely distributed in the gastrointestinal tract, brain, heart and other organs (59). Recent studies have demonstrated that both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV have ACE-2 cell invasion receptors (5,11); therefore, it is likely to cause acute lung injury by binding to the ACE-2 like SARS-CoV. The S-protein of the coronavirus contains two functional units, namely S1 and S2. S1 contains the RBD, which directly binds to the coronavirus host receptor ACE-2. S2 is responsible for the fusion of the virus with the host cell membrane. When S1 binds to the host ACE-2 receptor, the cleavage site of S2 is exposed, producing lytic host protease (60). The expression of ACE-2 is downregulated in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells (59). ACE-2 is a known peptidase that regulates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, thereby controlling blood pressure. It has been reported that hypertension and cardiovascular diseases are the most common complications of COVID-19(61).

5. Clinical symptoms and treatment

According to the current epidemiological data, SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted through respiratory droplets and close human contact. Increased amounts of aerosols and human excreta are also considered as potential routes of transmission. The incubation period of COVID-19 is estimated to be 1-14 days, with an average of 3-7 days (15). Furthermore, infected patients are primarily characterized by symptoms of the upper respiratory tract, such as fever (highest incidence), cough and runny nose. In addition, diarrhea and nervous system abnormalities are often observed (62,63). Therefore, individuals with the aforementioned symptoms residing in areas with a high incidence of viral pneumonia are considered as high-risk individuals. The majority of adults or children infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop mild flu-like symptoms, while a small number of patients, particularly those with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, are prone to rapid acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure, multiple organ failure, or even death (64).

COVID-19 is a severe infectious disease, and active isolation measures are a prerequisite for all types of treatment. Therefore, the interruption of the transmission route, the protection of susceptible individuals and the active isolation of the virus carriers are crucial. At present, numerous countries worldwide, including China as well as countries first affected by the pandemic, are adopting strict quarantine measures, including the imposition of short-term lockdowns. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 are treated individually or collectively. Patients with COVID-19 are most commonly treated with the timely inhalation of effective hydrogen-oxygen mixture and antiviral therapy (65). Body temperature and oxygen saturation should be recorded regularly. In patients with severe COVID-19 infection, invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also be applied (66). In addition, treatment with plasma isolated from recovered patients is also considered an effective treatment approach (67). Among conventional drugs, antiviral agents, such as oseltamivir and acyclovir, and systemic glucocorticoids, such as methylprednisolone, have been also used in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. However, their effectiveness is questionable (68). Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, two antimalarial agents, can alter the pH of cells and are stored in lysosomes in a protonated form. It has been reported that these compounds weaken the ability of the virus to release its genetic material into the cell and replicate (69,70). Studies have demonstrated that the combination of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir and azithromycin has shown great promise in the treatment of COVID-19 (71,72). Another study revealed that the viral load was significantly reduced in patients treated with lopinavir and ritonavir (73). Based on the mechanism through which ACE2 mediates the invasion of the human body by SARS-CoV-2, captopril is considered an inhibitor of ACE2, which acts by attenuating the inflammatory reactions in severely ill patients (72). The immunopathology of COVID-19 is characterized by lymphopenia and lymphocyte dysfunction (74). In response to the immune characteristics of COVID-19, some researchers have proposed several immunotherapeutic strategies, such as enhancing the activity of lymphocytes or inhibiting inflammation. NK cell-based therapies and immunomodulators are used to enhance the activity of lymphocytes. To suppress inflammation, mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies, regulatory T-cell-based therapies and other strategies may be used (75).

The S protein on the surface of the coronavirus binds to the target protein that invades the surface of the receptor, thereby mediating the release of the viral genome into the host cell for replication (60). Therefore, S protein has been used as an immunogen for the development of antibodies (76). Compared with small-molecule drugs, monoclonal antibodies are relatively costly and more difficult to produce. However, they differ from other drugs, since they can engage the host immune system through the binding of their constant domains to the Fc gamma receptors on host immune cells. Antibodies are key components of most vaccines and will likely prove crucial for the development of an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. It has been reported that vaccines that selectively induce the production of antibodies targeting the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 may be particularly effective (25). Currently, >100 vaccines against COVID-19 are under research, including traditional live attenuated viral vaccines, inactivated viral vaccines, vector-based vaccines, as well as a new generation of safer recombinant-protein vaccines (77). Unfortunately, none of these has been approved for large-scale clinical application.

An important feature in the landscape of vaccine research and development for SARS-COV-2 is represented by the varied range of evaluated technological platforms, including nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), virus-like particles, peptides, viral vector (replicative and non-replicative), recombinant proteins, live attenuated viruses and inactivated viruses (78), potential vaccines must also pass the same clinical trial phase. This is especially important when it comes to safety issues, even during a pandemic.

6. Summary

SARS that erupted 17 years ago posed a threat to human health, and the current spread of COVID-19 has again brought feelings of fear. With the continuous research of scholars worldwide, a basic understanding of the transmission mode, pathological characteristics and potential pathogenesis of COVID-19 has now been acquired. Methods have also been developed to rapidly identify the virus, and various treatment measures have been systematically evaluated. This has strengthened the confidence of researchers and has provided hope that COVID-19 will be defeated. At present, some countries, including China, the United States, and the United Kingdom have increased the speed of vaccine research through open green channels, and some vaccines that have undergone clinical trials are beginning to be administered. However, judging by the current global pandemic trend, the threat of SARS-CoV-2 infection may continue for a long time to come.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

JL designed the theme of the present review. YS, XS, HH and YL retrieved the relevant literature. XS wrote and reviewed the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Meo SA, Alhowikan AM, Al-Khlaiwi T, Meo IM, Halepoto DM, Iqbal M, Usmani AM, Hajjar W and Ahmed N: Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV: Prevalence, biological and clinical characteristics comparison with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 24:2012–2019. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Hui DS, Memish ZA and Zumla A: Severe acute respiratory syndrome vs. the Middle East respiratory syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 20:233–241. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Chen J: Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV-A quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 22:69–71. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, et al: A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 382:727–733. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Kannan S, Shaik Syed Ali P, Sheeza A and Hemalatha K: COVID-19 (Novel Coronavirus 2019)-recent trends. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 24:2006–2011. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Wu YC, Chen CS and Chan YJ: The outbreak of COVID-19: An overview. J Chin Med Assoc. 83:217–220. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Xu W, Wu J and Cao L: COVID-19 pandemic in China: Context, experience and lessons. Health Policy Technol. 9:639–648. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Sookaromdee P and Wiwanitkit V: Imported cases of 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections in Thailand: Mathematical modelling of the outbreak. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 13(139)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Harapan H, Itoh N, Yufika A, Winardi W, Keam S, Te H, Megawati D, Hayati Z, Wagner AL and Mudatsir M: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review. J Infect Public Health. 13:667–673. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Benvenuto D, Giovanetti M, Salemi M, Prosperi M, De Flora C, Junior Alcantara LC, Angeletti S and Ciccozzi M: The global spread of 2019-nCoV: A molecular evolutionary analysis. Pathog Glob Health. 114:64–67. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, et al: A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 579:270–273. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 5:536–544. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Schoeman D and Fielding BC: Coronavirus envelope protein: Current knowledge. Virol J. 16(69)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, et al: Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 395:565–574. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ and Hsueh PR: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 55(105924)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

da Silva SJR, Silva CTAD, Guarines KM, Mendes RPG, Pardee K, Kohl A and Pena L: Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19. ACS Infect Dis. 6:2319–2336. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Li X, Zai J, Zhao Q, Nie Q, Li Y, Foley BT and Chaillon A: Evolutionary history, potential intermediate animal host, and cross-species analyses of SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol. 92:602–611. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Chan JF, Yip CC, To KK, Tang TH, Wong SC, Leung KH, Fung AY, Ng AC, Zou Z, Tsoi HW, et al: Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay validated in vitro and with clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 58:e00310–20. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Ling Y, Xu SB, Lin YX, Tian D, Zhu ZQ, Dai FH, Wu F, Song ZG, Huang W, Chen J, et al: Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 133:1039–1043. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Phan T: Genetic diversity and evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Infect Genet Evol. 81(104260)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Shen Z, Xiao Y, Kang L, Ma W, Shi L, Zhang L, Zhou Z, Yang J, Zhong J, Yang D, et al: Genomic diversity of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis. 71:713–720. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Tahamtan A and Ardebili A: Real-time RT-PCR in COVID-19 detection: Issues affecting the results. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 20:453–454. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Kim JY, Ko JH, Kim Y, Kim YJ, Kim JM, Chung YS, Kim HM, Han MG, Kim SY and Chin BS: Viral load kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in first two patients in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 35(e86)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Bustin SA and Nolan T: RT-qPCR testing of SARS-CoV-2: A primer. Int J Mol Sci. 21(3004)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Robbiani DF, Gaebler C, Muecksch F, Lorenzi JCC, Wang Z, Cho A, Agudelo M, Barnes CO, Gazumyan A, Finkin S, et al: Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature. 584:437–442. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Stadlbauer D, Amanat F, Chromikova V, Jiang K, Strohmeier S, Arunkumar GA, Tan J, Bhavsar D, Capuano C, Kirkpatrick E, et al: SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans: A detailed protocol for a serological assay, antigen production, and test setup. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 57(e100)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Amanat F, Stadlbauer D, Strohmeier S, Nguyen THO, Chromikova V, McMahon M, Jiang K, Arunkumar GA, Jurczyszak D, Polanco J, et al: A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat Med. 26:1033–1036. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Van Elslande J, Houben E, Depypere M, Brackenier A, Desmet S, André E, Van Ranst M, Lagrou K and Vermeersch P: Diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM antibody tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA in COVID-19 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 26:1082–1087. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Zainol Rashid Z, Othman SN, Abdul Samat MN, Ali UK and Wong KK: Diagnostic performance of COVID-19 serology assays. Malays J Pathol. 42:13–21. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Guo L, Ren L, Yang S, Xiao M, Chang D, Yang F, Dela Cruz CS, Wang Y, Wu C, Xiao Y, et al: Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis. 71:778–785. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Zhu Y, Liu YL, Li ZP, Kuang JY, Li XM, Yang YY and Feng ST: Clinical and CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). J Infect: Mar 3, 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.022 (Epub ahead of print).

32 

Xie C, Jiang L, Huang G, Pu H, Gong B, Lin H, Ma S, Chen X, Long B, Si G, et al: Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests. Int J Infect Dis. 93:264–267. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Ye Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Huang Z and Song B: Chest CT manifestations of new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A pictorial review. Eur Radiol. 30:4381–4389. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Franquet T: Imaging of pulmonary viral pneumonia. Radiology. 260:18–39. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Song F, Shi N, Shan F, Zhang Z, Shen J, Lu H, Ling Y, Jiang Y and Shi Y: Emerging 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia. Radiology. 295:210–217. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, Zheng D, Wang J, Hesketh RL, Yang L and Zheng C: Time course of lung changes at chest CT during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology. 295:715–721. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Yoon SH, Lee KH, Kim JY, Lee YK, Ko H, Kim KH, Park CM and Kim YH: Chest radiographic and CT findings of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Analysis of nine patients treated in Korea. Korean J Radiol. 21:494–500. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL and Remy J: Fleischner Society: Glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 246:697–722. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, et al: Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 8:420–422. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Zu ZY, Jiang MD, Xu PP, Chen W, Ni QQ, Lu GM and Zhang LJ: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A perspective from China. Radiology. 296:E15–E25. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Pan Y and Guan H: Imaging changes in patients with 2019-nCov. Eur Radiol. 30:3612–3613. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Xu YH, Dong JH, An WM, Lv XY, Yin XP, Zhang JZ, Dong L, Ma X, Zhang HJ and Gao BL: Clinical and computed tomographic imaging features of novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 80:394–400. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Liu J, Zheng X, Tong Q, Li W, Wang B, Sutter K, Trilling M, Lu M, Dittmer U and Yang D: Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol. 92:491–494. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H and Xiao SY: Pulmonary pathology of early phase 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia in two patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 15:700–704. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, Ping YF, Liu HW, Yu SC, Mou HM, Wang LH, Zhang HR, Fu WJ, et al: A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimal invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 49:411–417. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

46 

Wang C, Xie J, Zhao L, Fei X, Zhang H, Tan Y, Nie X, Zhou L, Liu Z, Ren Y, et al: Alveolar macrophage dysfunction and cytokine storm in the pathogenesis of two severe COVID-19 patients. EBioMedicine. 57(102833)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Calabrese F, Pezzuto F, Fortarezza F, Hofman P, Kern I, Panizo A, von der Thüsen J, Timofeev S, Gorkiewicz G and Lunardi F: Pulmonary pathology and COVID-19: Lessons from autopsy. The experience of European Pulmonary Pathologists. Virchows Arch. 477:359–372. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, Mehra MR, Schuepbach RA, Ruschitzka F and Moch H: Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 395:1417–1418. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Li X and Shan H: Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology. 158:1831–1833.e3. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Su H, Yang M, Wan C, Yi LX, Tang F, Zhu HY, Yi F, Yang HC, Fogo AB, Nie X and Zhang C: Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China. Kidney Int. 98:219–227. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Tabary M, Khanmohammadi S, Araghi F, Dadkhahfar S and Tavangar SM: Pathologic features of COVID-19: A concise review. Pathol Res Pract. 216(153097)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Briguglio M, Bona A, Porta M, Dell'Osso B, Pregliasco FE and Banfi G: Disentangling the hypothesis of host dysosmia and SARS-CoV-2: The bait symptom that hides neglected neurophysiological routes. Front Physiol. 11(671)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Suchonwanit P, Leerunyakul K and Kositkuljorn C: Cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19: Lessons learned from current evidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. 83:e57–e60. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Chen C, Zhang XR, Ju ZY and He WF: Advances in the research of cytokine storm mechanism induced by Corona Virus Disease 2019 and the corresponding immunotherapies. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 36(E005)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Nitulescu GM, Paunescu H, Moschos SA, Petrakis D, Nitulescu G, Ion GND, Spandidos DA, Nikolouzakis TK, Drakoulis N and Tsatsakis A: Comprehensive analysis of drugs to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection: Mechanistic insights into current COVID-19 therapies (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:467–488. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Ragab D, Salah Eldin H, Taeimah M, Khattab R and Salem R: The COVID-19 Cytokine Storm; What We Know So Far. Front Immunol. 11(1446)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Thompson MR, Kaminski JJ, Kurt-Jones EA and Fitzgerald KA: Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses. 3:920–940. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Coperchini F, Chiovato L, Croce L, Magri F and Rotondi M: The cytokine storm in COVID-19: An overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 53:25–32. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Zhang X, Li S and Niu S: ACE2 and COVID-19 and the resulting ARDS. Postgrad Med J. 96:403–407. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Tortorici MA and Veesler D: Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv Virus Res. 105:93–116. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Devaux CA, Rolain JM and Raoult D: ACE2 receptor polymorphism: Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, hypertension, multi-organ failure, and COVID-19 disease outcome. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 53:425–435. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Gu J, Han B and Wang J: COVID-19: Gastrointestinal manifestations and potential fecal-oral transmission. Gastroenterology. 158:1518–1519. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Li YC, Bai WZ and Hashikawa T: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may be at least partially responsible for the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol. 92:552–555. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al: Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 395:497–506. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Li H, Wang YM, Xu JY and Cao B: Potential antiviral therapeutics for 2019 Novel Coronavirus. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 43(E002)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

66 

MacLaren G, Fisher D and Brodie D: Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID-19: The potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. JAMA. 323:1245–1246. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Chen L, Xiong J, Bao L and Shi Y: Convalescent plasma as a potential therapy for COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 20:398–400. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Guo YR, Cao QD, Hong ZS, Tan YY, Chen SD, Jin HJ, Tan KS, Wang DY and Yan Y: The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak-an update on the status. Mil Med Res. 7(11)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Becker RC: Covid-19 treatment update: Follow the scientific evidence. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 50:43–53. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Dehelean CA, Lazureanu V, Coricovac D, Mioc M, Oancea R, Marcovici I, Pinzaru I, Soica C, Tsatsakis AM and Cretu O: SARS-CoV-2: Repurposed drugs and novel therapeutic approaches-insights into chemical structure-biological activity and toxicological screening. J Clin Med. 9(2084)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, et al: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 56(105949)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Serafin MB, Bottega A, Foletto VS, da Rosa TF, Hörner A and Hörner R: Drug repositioning is an alternative for the treatment of coronavirus COVID-19. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 55(105969)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Lim J, Jeon S, Shin HY, Kim MJ, Seong YM, Lee WJ, Choe KW, Kang YM, Lee B and Park SJ: Case of the index patient who caused tertiary transmission of COVID-19 Infection in Korea: The application of lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 infected pneumonia monitored by quantitative RT-PCR. J Korean Med Sci. 35(e79)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Lippi G and Plebani M: Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 58:1131–1134. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Yang L, Liu S, Liu J, Zhang Z, Wan X, Huang B, Chen Y and Zhang Y: COVID-19: Immunopathogenesis and Immunotherapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 5(128)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Casadevall A and Pirofski LA: The Ebola epidemic crystallizes the potential of passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. PLoS Pathogens. 11(e1004717)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

77 

Wang J, Peng Y, Xu H, Cui Z and Williams RO III: The COVID-19 vaccine race: Challenges and opportunities in vaccine formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 21(225)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Calina D, Docea AO, Petrakis D, Egorov AM, Ishmukhametov AA, Gabibov AG, Shtilman MI, Kostoff R, Carvalho F, Vinceti M, et al: Towards effective COVID-19 vaccines: Updates, perspectives and challenges (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:3–16. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-April 2021
Volume 3 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2632-2900
Online ISSN:2632-2919

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shu Y, He H, Shi X, Lei Y and Li J: Coronavirus disease‑2019 (Review). World Acad Sci J 3: 12, 2021
APA
Shu, Y., He, H., Shi, X., Lei, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Coronavirus disease‑2019 (Review). World Academy of Sciences Journal, 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.83
MLA
Shu, Y., He, H., Shi, X., Lei, Y., Li, J."Coronavirus disease‑2019 (Review)". World Academy of Sciences Journal 3.2 (2021): 12.
Chicago
Shu, Y., He, H., Shi, X., Lei, Y., Li, J."Coronavirus disease‑2019 (Review)". World Academy of Sciences Journal 3, no. 2 (2021): 12. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.83