Efficacies of minimally invasive puncture and small bone window craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, evaluation of motor‑evoked potentials and comparison of postoperative rehemorrhage between the two methods

Luan,Lei; Li,Maolei; Sui,Hang; Li,Guoliang; Pan,Wenyong

doi:10.3892/etm.2018.7094

Efficacies of minimally invasive puncture and small bone window craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, evaluation of motor‑evoked potentials and comparison of postoperative rehemorrhage between the two methods

Authors:
- Lei Luan
- Maolei Li
- Hang Sui
- Guoliang Li
- Wenyong Pan
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Neurosurgery, Chengyang People's Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266109, P.R. China
Published online on: December 13, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.7094
Pages: 1256-1261
Copyright: © Luan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Application value of the minimally invasive puncture and small bone window craniotomy in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage was investigated to explore the effects of the above treatment methods on motor‑evoked potentials (MEPs) and postoperative rehemorrhage. Patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who were admitted to Chengyang People's Hospital from March 2016 to December 2017 were selected and randomly divided into the minimally invasive group (n=40) and the craniotomy group (n=40). The minimally invasive group was treated with minimally invasive puncture and drainage for hematomas, while the craniotomy group received small bone window craniotomy for evacuation of hematomas. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. At 28 days after operation, the Chinese scale of clinical neurological deficit of stroke patients (CSS) score in the minimally invasive group was lower than that in the craniotomy group (p<0.05). At 28 days after operation, the S‑100β level in the minimally invasive group was lower than that in the craniotomy group (p<0.05). At 1 week after operation, 35 patients in the minimally invasive group were able to elicit MEP waveforms, and only 7 patients in the craniotomy group were able to elicit positive waveforms. At 2 weeks after operation, 40 patients in the minimally invasive group and 20 patients in the craniotomy group could elicit MEP waveforms, and the incubation period, central motor conduction time and amplitude in the former were significantly better than those in the latter (p<0.05). The operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter with more total expenses of hospitalization in the minimally invasive group compared to those in the craniotomy group (p<0.05). Compared with small bone window craniotomy, minimally invasive puncture can reduce serum S‑100β level. Its advantages are obvious, so it is worthy of promotion and application.

View Figures

View References

1	Chen G, Ping L, Zhou S, Liu W, Liu L, Zhang D, Li Z, Tian Y and Chen Z: Early prediction of death in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Exp Ther Med. 11:83–88. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Doden T, Sato H, Sasahara E, Murata T, Yako T, Kitazawa K, Higuchi K, Kobayashi S and Hashimoto T: Clinico-radiological characteristics and pathological diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 25:1736–1745. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Fouda AY, Artham S, El-Remessy AB and Fagan SC: Renin-angiotensin system as a potential therapeutic target in stroke and retinopathy: Experimental and clinical evidence. Clin Sci (Lond). 130:221–238. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Hu R and Feng H: Lenticulostriate artery and lenticulostriate-artery neural complex: New concept for intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Pharm Des. 23:2206–2211. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Matsumoto K, Sakaki S, Abekura M and Yoshimine T: Co-existence of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 146:1085–1089; discussion 1089. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Tian X, Shu H, Zhang H, Wang H and Guo L: Intracranial hemorrhage due to rupture of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm in a patient with pituitary adenoma. J Craniofac Surg. 26:e154–e155. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Yiannakopoulos CK: Carpal ligament decompression under local anaesthesia: The effect of lidocaine warming and alkalinisation on infiltration pain. J Hand Surg Br. 29:32–34. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Zhang Y, Liu B, Liu Z, Wang Y, Zhao H, Zi M, Wang L, Liu H, Chen Z and Xie Y: Development of a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with post-stroke spasticity. J Tradit Chin Med. 32:674–678. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Lue YJ, Lin RF, Chen SS and Lu YM: Measurement of the functional status of patients with different types of muscular dystrophy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 25:325–333. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Kenning TJ, Dalfino JC, German JW, Drazin D and Adamo MA: Analysis of the subdural evacuating port system for the treatment of subacute and chronic subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg. 113:1004–1010. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Southwell DG, Hervey-Jumper SL, Perry DW and Berger MS: Intraoperative mapping during repeat awake craniotomy reveals the functional plasticity of adult cortex. J Neurosurg. 124:1460–1469. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Velnar T and Bunc G: Iatrogenic metastasis of a benign meningioma to the periosteum at the site of previous craniotomy: A case report. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 120:766–769. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Chi FL, Lang TC, Sun SJ, Tang XJ, Xu SY, Zheng HB and Zhao HS: Relationship between different surgical methods, hemorrhage position, hemorrhage volume, surgical timing, and treatment outcome of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. World J Emerg Med. 5:203–208. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Morotti A, Paciaroni M, Zini A, Silvestrelli G, Del Zotto E, Caso V, Dell'Acqua ML, Simone AM, Lanari A, Costa P, et al: Risk profile of symptomatic lacunar stroke versus nonlobar intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 47:2141–2143. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Han WY, Tao YQ, Xu F, Zhang YQ, Li ZY and Liang GB: The short- and long-term efficacy analysis of stereotactic surgery combined external ventricular drainage in the treatment of the secondary intraventricular hemorrhage. Brain Behav. 7:e008642017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Guldberg-Kjär T and Johansson B: ADHD symptoms across the lifespan: A comparison of symptoms captured by the Wender and Barkley Scales and DSM-IV criteria in a population-based Swedish sample aged 65 to 80. J Atten Disord. 19:390–404. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Sonni S, Lioutas VA and Selim MH: New avenues for treatment of intracranial hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 16:2772014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Wang WZ, Jiang B, Liu HM, Li D, Lu CZ, Zhao YD and Sander JW: Minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs. conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Results from a randomized clinical trial in China. Int J Stroke. 4:11–16. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	James ML, Blessing R, Phillips-Bute BG, Bennett E and Laskowitz DT: S100B and brain natriuretic peptide predict functional neurological outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage. Biomarkers. 14:388–394. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Ikedo T, Nakamura K, Sano N, Nagata M, Okada Y, Terakawa Y and Murata T: Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potentials predict motor function outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage surgery. World Neurosurg. 90:518–523. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Voulgaris S, Karagiorgiadis D, Alexiou GA, Mihos E, Zigouris A, Fotakopoulos G, Drosos D and Pahaturidis D: Continuous intraoperative electromyographic and transcranial motor evoked potential recordings in spinal stenosis surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 17:274–276. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Bestmann S and Krakauer JW: The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour. Exp Brain Res. 233:679–689. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI