This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma of infancy with an incidence of approximately 4–7 cases per million children (1). As RMS can arise from any striated muscle in the body, the localization is very diverse. The most common site of origin is the head and neck region (35%), but also the genitourinary tract (24%) and the extremities (20%) are favoured afflicted spots (2). Histologically, RMS can be divided into two major subtypes. Embryonal RMS is the most common variant and is characterized by an early onset in children <10 years of age (3). Because of a fairly low tendency of metastasis, its prognosis, especially of the botryoid variant, is quite good (4). On the other hand, there is the alveolar RMS known as the second most common RMS subtype (3). Typical features of this subtype are a later onset, mainly in adolescence, the localization in extremities, and a worse prognosis, because of rapid metastasis and poor response to treatment (5). The RMS subtypes are also distinguishable on the molecular level. Embryonal RMS are commonly characterized by loss of heterozygosity of the chromosomal region 11p15, which affects the locus of the insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2) gene and leads to its overexpression (6). Alveolar RMS can bear two typical reciprocal translocations, one between chromosome 1 and 13 (t(1;13)(p36;q14)), the other between chromosome 2 and 13 (t(2;13)(p35;q14)). This can fuse the PAX3 or the PAX7 gene with the FKHR gene, which subsequently results in abnormal activation of target genes and oncogenic deregulation (7,8).

Currently, epigenetic alterations are discussed as an important element in the regulation of various factors implicated in tumor development. One of the most common molecular features of cancer cells is aberrant DNA methylation of usually unmethylated CpG islands located in the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes, which could lead to their transcriptional suppression (9). Although a whole plethora of epigenetically silenced genes has been described for most cancers, the methylation status of RMS is still fairly unknown. One of the few genes investigated in this tumor is Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 1 (RASSF1A) (10). The epigenetic downregulation of RASSF1A is a common phenomenon in a variety of childhood cancers and associated with poorer prognosis in some of them (11,12). Nevertheless, because of the important link between promoter methylation and the development and progression of cancer the identification of epigenetically regulated genes in RMS is of utmost importance.

A candidate gene for epigenetic regulation encodes the bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), which belongs to the transforming growth factor β superfamily. Although BMP2 was first described as an initiator of enchondral bone formation (13), its function is way more comprehensive playing important roles in embryonic development during the formation and differentiation of various organs (14–16). BMPs act via activation of transmembrane serine/threonine-kinase-receptors, which are composed of type I and type II subunits, namely BMPR1A, BMPR1B and BMPR2 (17). This heterodimerization leads to phosphorylation and grouping of SMAD proteins and their translocation to the nucleus. After binding to specific DNA-sequences, several target genes, such as ID1-3 (inhibitor of DNA binding protein 1-3) are either going to be activated or repressed (18). Besides these physiological mechanisms of action, BMP2 is also involved in tumorigenesis. There is growing evidence that suggests BMP2 as an important tumor suppressor gene. It was shown that different tumors often feature a genetic loss of BMP2 expression (19). Reconstitution of BMP2 function through recombinant BMP2 treatment resulted in a reduced growth and even partially increased apoptosis rate of tumor cells, as described for prostate carcinoma, medulloblastoma, and myeloma (20–22).

Here, we aimed at identifying epigenetically silenced genes in RMS in order to further the understanding of tumor development and progression. Our finding that BMP2 is heavily methylated and the gene thus transcriptionally inactive in RMS cell lines along with the anti-proliferative effect mediated by BMP2 reconstitution in vitro suggests a strong tumor suppressive role of this protein, which might be of use to develop future treatment options.

Materials and methods

Tumor cell lines

We used the three different RMS cell lines RD (embryonal RMS, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), RH30 (alveolar RMS, DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany), and RMS13 (alveolar RMS, ATCC). The embryonal RUCH2 as well as the alveolar RH4 and RH18 cell lines were generously provided by Dr Beat Schäfer. All cell lines were maintained as the suppliers recommended.

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from fresh-frozen healthy muscle tissue and RMS cell lines in TRI Reagent® RNA isolation reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). Total RNA was depleted from DNA and subsequently purified using RNeasy Mini Kit in combination with DNase set (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Reverse transcription of total RNA was performed using random hexamers (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) and SuperScript® II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). RT-PCR amplifications of the selected genes were carried out with 40 ng complementary DNA, 10 μM forward and reverse primer, and 2X iTaq SYBR-Green Supermix with ROX (Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, Germany) in a final volume of 20 μl. RT-PCR reactions started with a primary denaturation for 2 min at 95°C and thereupon were run for 40 cycles consisting of 15-sec denaturation at 95°C, primer annealing for 15 sec at 55°C, and extension for 20 sec at 68°C. We used the following primer pairs (5′→3′ orientation): BMP2, CAGCCAG CCGAGCCAA, AATCTCCGGGTTGTTTTCCC; BMPR1A, CTACCAAACTGTGCTAATGCGC, CAAATAGAGCTGAG TCCAGGAACC; BMPR1B, CCATTGTCCAGAAGACTC AGTCAA, CACAGGCAACCCAGAGTCATC; BMPR2, TGGACGCATGGAATATTTGC, GCTTACCCAGTCACTT GTGTGG; CDKN1A, AGGCTGAAGGGTCCCCAG, CGGC GTTTGGAGTGGTAGAA; CDKN2A, AGGCAGTAACCA TGCCCG, TTCCCGAGGTTTCTCAGAGC; CDKN2B, AGCTGAGCCCAGGTCTCCTAG, CACCGTTGGCCGTAA ACTTAAC; ID1, AACGGCTGTTACTCACGCCT, CGATGA CGTGCTGGAGAATCT; ID3, CCTGGACCCCCTGATGG, GGCAAAAGCTCCTTTTGTCGT; RASSF1A, GGCGTCG TGCGCAAA, GATCTTCTGCTCAATCTCAGCTTG; TBP, GCCCGAAACGCCGAATAT, CCGTGGTTCGTGGCTC TCT. Primer sequences of the 92-gene screening approach are available upon request. RT-PCR amplifications were performed on a Mastercycler ep realplex2 S (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and all experiments were performed in doublets. Amplification of the housekeeping gene TATA-box-binding-protein (TBP) was performed to standardize the amount of sample RNA. Relative quantification of gene expression was performed using the ΔΔct method as described earlier (23).

Methylation analyses

Genomic DNA of RMS cell lines was extracted with phenol and chloroform, ethanol precipitated and dissolved in TE buffer following standard procedures. In order to get fully methylated DNA as a positive control for methylation analyses, 10 μg genomic DNA extracted from blood of a healthy individual was incubated with CpG methyltransferase M. SssI (4 U/μl, New England Biolabs, Frankfurt, Germany) in 10X NE buffer 2 and SAM (1:20) for 4 h at 37°C. After enzyme inactivation at 65°C, DNA was precipitated with 0.3 μM sodium acetate and 100% ethanol. Genomic DNA was bisulfite-treated using EpiTect® Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen GmbH).

For bisulfite sequencing, we amplified bisulfite-modified genomic DNA by using primers not specific for methylation status (BMP2-BS-fw, CAAAGGGCACTTGGCCCCAGGG; BMP2-BS-rev, CAAGTTATTCTCCCTGCAAGTTCA). We cloned the PCR products into the pCR2.1 vector and transformed them into TOP10F’ (both from Invitrogen). After the preparation of plasmid DNA by the use of Qiagen plasmid mini kit (Qiagen), the clones were sent for sequencing (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany).

For methylation-specific-PCR (MSP), we used primer-pairs specific for either methylated or unmethylated CpGs that bind to two different regions of the BMP2 promoter (Fig. 2A). The following primer sets were used (5′→3′-orientation): BMP2 region 1 methylated, GTAGAGCGCGTTATAGCGTC, CATC GCGACGCTAAAAAT; BMP2 region 1 unmethylated, GGT AGAGTGTGTTATAGTGTTGTGG, ACATCACAACACTA AAAATCAACTC; BMP2 region 2 methylated, TGGTATCG AGATCGTCGTC, TCCGAAACTCGAAAATCG; BMP2 region 2 unmethylated, GTTTGGTATTGAGATTGTTGT TGT, AACTCCAAAACTCAAAAATCA. Primer design for MSP was accomplished using Methyl Primer Express (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) considering the following criteria: primers cover at least three CpG dinucleotides in its sequence, CpG percentage >55%, observed/expected CpG >65%, and CpG island length between 300–2,000 bp. The MSP reaction contained 225 ng DNA, 10 μM forward and reverse primer, 10 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, 25 mM MgCl2, 1 U Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase, and 10X Hot Start PCR buffer (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). Conditions for MSP were 95°C for 4 min, followed by 38 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C (BMP2 region 1) or 59°C (BMP2 region 2) for 30 sec and 72°C for 45 sec, with a final extension cycle of 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel.

Figure 2. Methylation analyses of the BMP2 promoter region. (A) Schematic drawing of the promoter region (−270 to +500 bp relative to the transcription start site) of the BMP2 gene showing the distribution of CpGs (vertical lines) within the CpG island, the location of the primers used for bisulfite sequencing, and the two methylation specific PCRs (MSP-1 and MSP-2). (B) A region of 493 bp including 50 CpG dinucleotides (represented by black and white dots for the methylated and unmethylated state, respectively) was analyzed for DNA methylation by bisulfite sequencing in RD, RMS13 and RH30 cells, with every line representing one single DNA clone. Genomic DNA and SssI-treated DNA served as a negative and positive control for methylated CpGs, respectively. (C) Representative images of MSP-1 and MSP-2 from bisulfite converted DNA of 5-Aza-dC treated and untreated RMS cell lines. M, methylation specific PCR; U, PCR specific for unmethylated CpGs.

For DNA demethylation experiments, cells were seeded in 5 or 25 cm2 cell flasks and incubated with 1 μM 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) for 5 days. Demethylating agent-containing media were changed every day.

Cell viability assay

For proliferation assays 5×103 cells/96-well plates were treated with recombinant human BMP2 (rhBMP2, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in concentrations of 50, 75, 100, and 200 ng/ml. The viability was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h using the Cell Proliferation Kit I (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Optical density was measured after the addition of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) labeling reagent on the GENios microplate reader (Tecan Deutschland GmbH, Crailsheim, Germany) at a wavelength of 595 nm.

Apoptosis analyses

For Annexin V-based apoptosis analysis, cells were seeded in 6-well plates (5×105 cells/well) and treated with 75 ng/ml rhBMP2 for 24, 48 and 72 h. Thereafter, the cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and suspended in 500 μl of calcium-containing binding buffer. Cy5-conjugated Annexin V (1:100; BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA) and 1 mM calcein AM (Invitrogen) were added to the cell suspension. Early apoptotic cells (Annexin V and calcein-positive) were detected using cell fluorescence assays on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means plus standard deviations and statistically subjected to Student’s unpaired t-test. A level of p<0.05 was considered significant. BMP2 expression values and clinical data of the Williamson and colleagues study (24) were retrieved from the ArrayExpress database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/ETABM-1202/) and analyzed with Mann-Whitney test and Spearman correlation using GraphPad Prism 5.0.

Results

Identification of BMP2 as an epigenetically silenced gene in RMS cell lines

In a first step, we performed an expression profiling analysis of three RMS tumor cell lines that were treated with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-dC, which should result in the re-expression of epigenetically silenced genes. By using an in-house developed RT-PCR-based assay that simultaneously measures 92 genes implicated in different embryonal signaling pathways, we found 11 genes to be upregulated ≥3-fold in two 5-Aza-dC treated RMS cell lines (GLI1, SHH, FOXA2, DKK1, TWIST1, DTX1, IGFBP3, CDH1, IHH, CDKN1C and IGF1). Importantly, strong increased mRNA expression levels of BMP2 (up to 20-fold) and RASSF1A (up to 100-fold) were detected in all treated RMS cell lines (Fig. 1A), the latter confirming earlier results (10). This suggests that BMP2 is epigenetically silenced in RMS.

Figure 1. Identification of BMP2 as an epigenetically silenced gene in RMS cell lines. (A) Schematic compilation of the results from the quantitative real-time RT-PCR-based screening assay that shows the fold-induction of the candidate genes in different RMS cell lines treated for 5 days with 5 μM 5-Aza-dC, as compared to untreated cells. Candidate genes with a mean induction of gene expression in all three RMS cell lines >3-fold are indicated. (B) Relative mRNA and (C) protein levels of BMP2 in healthy skeletal muscle tissue (SM) and the RMS tumor cell lines RD, RH30 and RMS13. Immunodetection of β-actin served as a standard for equal protein loading of the gel. Relative mRNA expression of the target genes (D) ID1 and (E) ID3 in SM and RMS cells in relation to the housekeeping gene TBP. (F) Representative image of the RT-PCR demonstrating the abundance of the BMP receptor genes BMPR1A, BMPR1B and BMPR2 in SM and RMS cells.

BMP2 signaling is inactive in RMS cell lines

BMP2 is known to activate a signalling cascade via binding to BMP receptor complexes, which leads to the transcription of the downstream target genes ID1 and ID3 (17). As expected from the demethylation experiments, all RMS cell lines expressed very low levels of BMP2 mRNA (Fig. 1B) and protein (Fig. 1C), as compared to normal skeletal muscle. In line with the absence of the BMP2 ligand, transcriptional activity of ID1 and ID3 was very low in the RMS cell lines (Fig. 1D and E). By measuring the expression of all three BMP receptor subtypes we could rule out that a lack of receptor expression might be the cause for pathway inactivity (Fig. 1F).

CpG island methylation is present in RMS tumor cell lines

To investigate whether the suppression of the BMP2 gene is caused by DNA hypermethylation, we first screened the BMP2 locus for the occurrence of CpG-islands. We found a CpG-rich region of approximately 500 bp in the 5′-untranslated region of the BMP2 gene, spanning 50 CpG-dinucleotides (Fig. 2A). Bisulfite sequencing of this region revealed extremely high methylation rates for the two alveolar RMS cell lines RH30 (97.2%) and RMS13 (98.0%) cells, whereas the embryonal RMS cell line RD was less methylated and featured a methylation rate of only 18.4% (Fig. 2B). In contrast, DNA isolated from peripheral blood displayed no methylation of the whole region under investigation (1.6%). In vitro methylated DNA (SssI-treated) served as an internal control for detecting full methylation (99.2%).

In a next step we analyzed if the increase in BMP2 expression upon 5-Aza-dC treatment is associated with DNA demethylation. We therefore performed methylation specific PCR (MSP) of two regions (Fig. 2A), one covering the central part of the CpG islands screened before by bisulfite sequencing (MSP-2), the other a CpG-rich region in the putative BMP2 promoter region (MSP-1). In untreated cells, MSP assays showed strong methylation of both regions in RH30 and RMS13 cells, whereas RD cells had a band only for the unmethylated state (Fig. 2C). Upon 5-Aza-dC treatment, RH30 and RMS13 cells exhibited bands for both the methylated and the unmethylated state, thereby suggesting demethylation of large proportions of the BMP2 locus. In contrast, the methylation status of 5-Aza-dC treated RD cells remained unchanged (Fig. 2C). As BMP2 promoter methylation was more pronounced in the two alveolar RMS cell lines we performed further MSP analysis before and after 5-Aza-dC treatment using additional RMS cell lines (embryonal, RUCH2; alveolar, RH4 and RH18) and detected a similar pattern (Fig. 2C).

BMP2 expression is preferentially downregulated in alveolar RMS

In order to see whether BMP2 expression differs between the RMS subtypes not only in tumor cell lines but also in primary tissue, we studied the BMP2 mRNA levels in a large cohort of human RMS samples that have previously been analyzed in a microarray-based expression profiling study (25). As expected, we found significantly decreased expression levels of BMP2 in alveolar RMS compared to embryonal RMS (Fig. 3A). However, there was no gross difference between translocation-positive and -negative alveolar RMS. In line with the increased age of RMS patients with the alveolar subtype we found a trend towards lower BMP2 expression levels in older patients (Fig. 3B). These data suggest that methylation-dependent BMP2 suppression predominantly occurs in alveolar RMS.

Figure 3. BMP2 expression in human RMS primary samples. (A) Normalized expression of the BMP2 gene in embryonal (ERMS) and translocation-positive and -negative alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS), as described in ref. 24. The mean expression values and statistical significances from the unpaired Mann-Whitney test are given. (B) Relative expression of BMP2 was correlated with the patient age. Statistical significance was calculated using Spearman correlation.

BMP2 reconstitution leads to reduced RMS cell viability

Having shown that BMP2 expression can be reactivated by demethylation, we determined the effects of BMP2 reconstitution in RMS cells by supplementation of recombinant human BMP2 (rhBMP2). Using cell viability as readout, we detected a complete block of proliferation in all three RMS cell lines at doses of 100 and 200 ng/ml rhBMP2, an effect that was already amenable after 24 h (Fig. 4A). In contrast, doses of ≤50 ng/ml rhBMP2 had no effect on RMS cell growth, even after 72 h of incubation. By choosing an intermediate concentration of 75 ng/ml rhBMP2 we found a significantly decreased cell viability of RD, RH30 and RMS13 cells after 72 h, with RH30 being the most sensitive cell line (Fig. 4B). To ensure BMP2 pathway induction by this rhBMP2 concentration, we checked transcriptional activation of the target genes ID1 and ID3 upon treatment. Indeed, significantly induced mRNA expression of at least one of the target genes was found in each cell line, which was most prominent in RH30 cells (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4. Functional analyses of BMP2 reconstitution. Viability assays of RMS cell lines were performed after treatment with (A) 0, 50, 100 and 200 ng/ml rhBMP2 for 0–72 h as well as (B) 75 ng/ml rhBMP2 for 72 h. (C) Relative mRNA expression levels of the target genes ID1 and ID3 in relation to the housekeeping gene TBP. (D) Early apoptotic cells were determined by Annexin V- and calcein-staining after 72 h of 75 ng/ml rhBMP2-treatment. (E) Relative mRNA expression levels of the cell cycle inhibitor genes CDKN1A, CDKN2A and CDKN2B with and without treatment of 75 ng/ml rhBMP2 for 72 h. Bars represent relative candidate gene expression in relation to the housekeeping gene TBP. Significant statistical difference versus untreated cells: *Significant with p<0.05 (unpaired Student’s t-test).

Next, we analyzed if reduced cell growth is associated with an enhanced apoptosis. Using 75 ng/ml rhBMP2 and Annexin V staining as readout for early apoptosis, we found no significant influence of rhBMP2 treatment on the apoptosis rate at 24 and 48 h in the three RMS cell lines (data not shown). After 72 h of treatment, only RH30 cells showed an increase in apoptosis, whereas RD and RMS13 showed no response (Fig. 4D).

To obtain insight into the mechanism of cell proliferation inhibition, we furthermore examined mRNA levels of the growth inhibitor genes CDKN1A, CDKN2A and CDKN2B. Treatment of RMS tumor cell lines with 75 ng/ml rhBMP2 led to significant upregulation of CDKN2A and CDKN2B mRNA levels in RD, but not in RH30 and RMS13 cells (Fig. 4E).

Taken together, these results suggest that reconstitution of BMP2 in RMS cells leads to the inhibition of cell proliferation, presumably caused by either the induction of apoptosis (RH30) or cell cycle arrest (RD).

Discussion

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes via CpG hypermethylation is a well-known phenomenon fostering tumor growth and progression in a variety of cancers (9,26). In RMS, however, very little is known about the epigenetic basis of tumor development. In order to detect epigenetically silenced genes in RMS, we performed an expression profiling analysis of three RMS cell lines treated with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-dC. Besides others, our approach identified two candidate genes, RASSF1A and BMP2, which displayed the most significant transcriptional upregulation in all three cell lines.

RASSF1A has already been shown to be epigenetically silenced in RMS (10). As RASSF1A is thought to act as a tumor suppressor in other tumors including lung, breast, kidney, bladder and ovarian cancer (27–31), it has been suggested that loss of RASSF1A through epigenetic silencing is also critical in RMS development (10). Although this has not yet been proven experimentally, the identification of RASSF1A in our approach at least underscores the reliability of our experimental setup to identify epigenetically silenced genes.

BMP2 has been suggested to be a negative regulator in the growth of skeletal muscle, which can be deduced from the finding that BMP2 overexpression inhibits injury-induced intimal hyperplasia (32). Furthermore, overexpression of the positive regulator of myogenesis follistatin leads to an exorbitant increase of skeletal muscle in mice by neutralizing the inhibitory action of activin, myostatin and BMP2 (33,34). In line with this, BMP2 expression was very high in fully differentiated normal muscle tissue, both on the mRNA and protein level, whereas the levels in all RMS cell lines were significantly low. Besides the impaired BMP2 expression it has been reported that the BMP2/SMAD pathway itself could be defective and contributes to tumor growth, as described for colon cancer (35,36). By detecting all three BMP-receptor components (BMPR1A, BMPR1B and BMPR2) in RMS and in normal muscle tissue as well as by revealing the induction of the target genes ID1 and ID3 after rhBMP2 treatment we could avert the suspicion that an impaired BMP2/SMAD pathway might be the reason for non-activated BMP2 signaling.

Interestingly, BMP2 expression in RMS was increased after 5-Aza-dC treatment to levels found in healthy muscle tissue. These results suggested that DNA methylation might be the major cause of BMP2 suppression in RMS cells, a scenario that has earlier been described in gastric cancer (37). Indeed, using bisulfite sequencing of a CpG-island located in the promoter region of BMP2, we found an almost complete methylation of all CpG-dinucleotides in the two investigated alveolar RMS cell lines, whereas the embryonal RMS cell line RD showed a distinct methylation of ∼20%. In clear contrast is the methylation pattern of DNA isolated from whole blood, which was completely unmethylated. These findings were verified by methylation specific PCR, also in additional RMS cell lines. Furthermore, significantly lower BMP2 expression levels in primary ARMS compared to ERMS together with the differential methylation patterns in alveolar compared to embryonal RMS cell lines strengthen previous findings of diverse methylation patterns in RMS subtypes (38). Therefore, the mechanism of gene silencing via promoter hypermethylation, which is well known from a variety of different cancers (9,26,39,40), can also be anticipated of being important in RMS. In view of only moderate methylation patterns in the embryonal RMS cell line, there may also be mechanisms other than promoter hypermethylation causing BMP2 silencing. Accordingly, it has been shown that the transcription of BMP2 in osteoblasts is regulated via enhancers, regulatory DNA elements located far upstream of the promoter (41,42). Thus, methylation of these elements or other unknown regions at the BMP2 locus not covered by our assays may be responsible for BMP2 silencing.

In order to illuminate whether demethylation is the cause of BMP2 reexpression after 5-Aza-dC treatment, we determined the methylation pattern in treated RMS cell lines. However, the assumed demethylating effect of 5-Aza-dC causing the re-expression was only obvious in the two RMS cell lines showing strong CpG methylation, although all three cell lines showed a significant reactivation of BMP2 gene expression after treatment. This discrepancy could be explained by the finding that 5-Aza-dC is known of being a relatively unspecific agent, which can also change histone modifications which might be important in the transcriptional regulation of BMP2 in RD cells. Furthermore, 5-Aza-dC leads to global demethylation and thereby transcriptional regulation of many different genes (43,44). In colon cancer it has been shown that 5-Aza-dC rather led to global demethylation than specific demethylation in CpG-rich promoter regions, which results in a strong gene re-expression (45). Similar results have been described for the CDH1 gene in malignant liver tumors (46). Thus, it can be suggested that not only strong demethylation in promoter regions can cause re-expression of genes, but also demethylation on distant parts of the gene. In addition, histone modifications or methylation of other parts of the BMP2 promoter, which were not included in our analysis, could be responsible for changes in BMP2 expression.

In a variety of tumors with loss of BMP2 expression, e.g., medulloblastoma (22), gastric, breast, colon and prostatic cancer (19,36,37,47–49), the reconstitution of BMP2 resulted in reduced tumor proliferation. In addition, research on smooth muscle cells, whose growth were restricted by rhBMP2 and BMP2 gene transfer (32,50), gave reason to expect a similar function in RMS. After having proved the induction of the BMP2 pathway in RMS cells upon rhBMP2 treatment by the transcriptional activation of the well-known BMP2 target genes ID1 and ID3 (18,51,52), we could show that rhBMP2 treatment significantly reduced RMS cell proliferation in all cell lines in a dose-dependent manner, thereby suggesting that BMP2 acts as a tumor suppressor gene by the inhibition of RMS tumor growth.

The ability of rhBMP2 to reduce proliferation has been already ascribed to a raised G1-arrest with consecutive apoptosis, as described for myeloma cells (21). Moreover, smooth muscle cells have been reported to react on BMP2 by reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis (53). Nevertheless, there are also reports of cell protective effects, such as a reduced apoptosis rate in neuroectodermal cells (54). Accordingly, the BMP2 function on apoptosis seems to be tissue- or at least cell type-dependent. Our apoptosis analysis on BMP2-treated RMS cells only detected an enhanced apoptosis rate in one of three cell lines (RH30), despite reduced proliferation in all RMS cell lines. In order to illuminate this divergence between proliferation and apoptosis, we examined mRNA levels of CDKN1A (p21), CDKN2A (p16) and CDKN2B (p15), important genes for the control of the cell cycle and the G1-phase (55). CDKN1A has been described earlier to be activated via rhBMP2 treatment in gastric cancer and smooth muscle leading to reduced cell proliferation (49,50). However, a significant increase of these genes after rhBMP2 treatment was only detected in one cell line (RD). Thus, we assume that the inhibition of proliferation through BMP2 is not due to a single mechanism, but rather that cell cycle-arrest and in addition the induction of apoptosis are relevant, which has to be addressed in future experiments.

Collectively, our study shows that BMP2 is silenced in RMS via promoter hypermethylation and that the reconstitution of BMP2 significantly decreases tumor cell proliferation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for the growth suppressive effect of BMP2 are not entirely clear, as the induction of apoptosis or cell cycle-inhibitory genes is not evident in all RMS cell lines. Nevertheless, our data warrant further investigations on the use of BMP2 reconstitution for therapeutic purposes in RMS.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Fatemeh Promoli, Anett Domokos, and Nicole Stadler for technical assistance. Dr Beat Schäfer (University of Zurich, Switzerland) provided the RMS cell lines. This study was supported by the FöFoLe program ‘Molecular Medicine’ of the Medical Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich.

References