Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Molecular and Clinical Oncology
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 2049-9450 Online ISSN: 2049-9469
Journal Cover
July-August 2013 Volume 1 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
July-August 2013 Volume 1 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article

Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey

  • Authors:
    • Mingying Yang
    • Haifeng Wang
    • Jiansong Wang
    • Minghui Ruan
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Urology, Kunming, Yunnan 650101, P.R. China, Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Urology, Kunming, Yunnan 650101, P.R. China
  • Pages: 758-762
    |
    Published online on: May 20, 2013
       https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.125
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Bladder cancer is a common type of genitourinary cancer, and radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is considered to be the most effective local treatment for invasive bladder cancer. In order to assess the functional results and health-related quality of life (QOL) in bladder cancer patients with an orthotopic neobladder, and to provide a reasonable basis for the evaluation of urinary diversion in situ, we conducted a study on 96 neobladder patients. In December, 2011, questionnaires were mailed to 96 patients that had undergone urinary diversion surgery between January, 2007 and December, 2009. The questionnaire included the validated health-related QOL questionnaire and the MOS 36-item Short‑Form Health Survey (SF-36). We compared the functional results between patients with an orthotopic neobladder and those with other types of urinary diversion at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Data from 82 patients (54 with orthotopic and 28 with non‑orthotopic urinary diversion) were included in the analysis. The SF-36 patient scores following orthotopic urinary diversion were significantly higher than those following non-orthotopic urinary diversion. The majority of patients with orthotopic urinary diversion considered themselves as healthy and their scores of total health were higher compared to those of patients with non-orthotopic urinary diversion. However, there were no differences in the scores of physical functioning between patients with orthotopic and those with non-orthotopic urinary diversion. Our findings regarding health-related QOL and the frequency of complications in the orthotopic and the non‑orthotopic urinary diversion groups were similar. However, the mental health of patients with orthotopic urinary diversion was more easily restored compared to that of patients with non‑orthotopic urinary diversion, which reduced their overall recovery time.

Introduction

Bladder cancer is a common type of genitourinary cancer. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is considered to be the most effective local treatment for invasive bladder cancer (1,2). As regards quality of life (QOL), including urinary, sexual and social functioning, daily living activities and body image satisfaction, orthotopic continent diversions are considered the ‘gold standard’ among reconstructive procedures (3–5). However, QOL has not been sufficiently assessed in non-metastatic bladder cancer patients (NMBC) (6). Therefore, available data on the comparison of the impact of different treatments on the QOL of NMBC patients are limited (7). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score is extensively used worldwide and is considered to be accurate (8–11). SF-36 has become a standard questionnaire and it may be applied to patients as well as to healthy subjects. In addition, the questions may be easily answered within a short time and they are limited to the evaluation of basic issues regarding overall health. In this study, we compared the functional results between patients with an orthotopic and those with a non-orthotopic neobladder at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, using the SF-36 method.

Patients and methods

Patients

Between January, 2007 and December, 2009, an orthotopic neobladder reconstruction was performed on 54 patients (experimental group). In addition, non-orthotopic neobladder surgery (cutaneous diversion), was performed in 28 patients (control group). The experimental group included 50 patients with transitional cell carcinoma (5 with T1, 31 with T2 and 14 with T3), 2 with squamous cell carcinoma, 1 with adenocarcinoma and 1 with neuroendocrine carcinoma (mean age of the 54 patients, 66.0 years). The control group included a total of 28 patients with a non-orthotopic neobladder, 27 of which had transitional cell carcinoma (14 had T2, 12 had T3 and 1 had T4) and 1 had adenocarcinoma (T2) (mean age of the 28 patients, 65.6 years). The 82 patient samples were all confirmed by pathological examination following surgery. This study complies with current ethical considerations. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kunming Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Methods

The functional results of the two groups were compared at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery, using the SF-36 survey method. Regarding the orthotopic reconstruction, most of the surgical techniques were based on Studer’s method. At a time point of >6 months after surgery, the SF-36 survey was conducted by mail to determine the QOL of patients with an orthotopic and that of patients with a non-orthotopic neobladder. The SF-36 survey consisted of 36 questions and the 2nd question was a self-evaluation of health status, which was not included in the score calculation. We assessed 8 aspects of health-related QOL: physical functioning, role-physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional functioning and mental health. The number of questions regarding each health concept ranged from 2 for social functioning and bodily pain to 10 for physical functioning and the number of response options per question ranged from 2 (yes or no) to 6 (none, very mild, mild, moderate, severe or very severe). The score per question was estimated for each health concept, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of an improved outcome. For the orthotopic neobladder patients, a detailed continence questionnaire (not validated) including voiding questions was examined on the same day as the SF-36 survey.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data were reported as the means ± SD. The differences in the mean values between the ileal neobladder and the cutaneous diversion patients were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Data regarding the percentage of patients with a neobladder, the number of males, the number of patients with a pathological stage T3 or higher and the current disease status were analysed by the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Comparison of data from the SF-36 survey between the experimental and control groups at the time point of 6 months

All 82 patients (100%) were available for assessment at the time point of 6 months. A total of 51 out of the 54 patients in the experimental group (94.4%) and 26 out of the 28 in the control group (92.9%) were available for assessment at the time point of 12 months. A total of 45 patients in the experimental group (83.3%) and 23 in the control group (82.1%) were available for assessment at the time point of 24 months. All questionnaires were qualified. At the time point of 6 months, the response rate was similar for the experimental group (54/54, 100%) and for the control group (28/28, 100%). The majority of patients (76/82, 92.7%) indicated that their physical condition was worse compared to 1 year before when were the questionnaires completed. Data from the SF-36 survey are provided in Table I and Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of data from the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 6 months (*P<0.05). TMH, total mental health; TPH, total physical health; MH, mental health; RE, role-emotional functioning; SF, social functioning; VT, vitality; GH, general health; BP, bodily pain; RP, role-physical functioning; RF, physical functioning.

Table I.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 6 months.

Table I.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 6 months.

ItemsExperimental group (n=54)Control group (n=28)P-value
Physical functioning22.13±5.4221.26±3.040.27
Role-physical functioning6.32±1.045.34±0.740.08
Bodily pain8.36±1.417.52±2.630.29
General health14.82±3.1912.26±4.270.14
Vitality15.49±2.8816.62±5.430.31
Social functioning7.83±1.154.49±1.290.01
Role-emotional functioning3.96±1.033.73±0.820.77
Mental health21.49±3.3716.20±4.330.02
Overall health105.80±18.4996.36±16.420.11
  Total physical health52.23±7.7449.76±6.200.32
  Total mental health51.93±6.9142.77±5.120.01
Comparison of data from the SF-36 survey between the experimental and control groups at the time point of 12 months

The social functioning and mental health scores in the experimental group were significantly higher compared to those in the control group (P<0.05) and the QOL score in the experimental group was higher compared to the control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). At the time point of 12 months, the response rates of the experimental group and the control group were 51/54 (94.4%) and 26/28 (92.9%), respectively. In the experimental group, 1 patient succumbed to multiple metastases of bladder cancer, 1 expired due to non-cancerous causes and 1 was lost to follow-up. In the experimental group, 22 patients (43.1%) indicated that their physical condition was worse compared to 1 year before, 27 (52.9%) indicated that their physical condition had improved compared to 1 year before and 2 (3.9%) observed no differences compared to 1 year before when they completed the questionnaires. In the control group, 16 patients (61.5%) indicated that their physical condition was worse compared to 1 year before and 10 (38.5%) indicated that their physical condition had improved compared to 1 year before when they completed the questionnaires. Data from the SF-36 survey are provided in Table II and Fig. 2. The general health, social functioning, role-emotional functioning and mental health scores in the experimental group were significantly higher compared to those in the control group (P<0.05). The QOL score in the experimental group was higher compared to that in the control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Figure 2.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental control groups at 12 months (*P<0.05). TMH, total mental health; TPH, total physical health; MH, mental health; RE, role-emotional functioning; SF, social functioning; VT, vitality; GH, general health; BP, bodily pain; RP, role-physical functioning; RF, physical functioning.

Table II.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 12 months.

Table II.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 12 months.

ItemsExperimental group (n=51)Control group (n=26)P-value
Physical functioning23.22±4.3722.14±2.030.17
Role-physical functioning6.46±1.186.07±1.240.26
Bodily pain10.47±2.4310.64±3.060.63
General health19.64±5.2316.18±5.010.03
Vitality17.38±3.2715.33±5.060.11
Social functioning8.72±0.963.47±1.040.01
Role-emotional functioning4.29±1.173.62±0.930.01
Mental health24.36±4.7414.71±3.890.01
Overall health114.7±17.3293.17±11.240.11
  Total physical health55.69±6.3448.17±5.470.08
  Total mental health57.49±4.9340.16±6.360.01
Comparison of data from the SF-36 survey between the experimental and control groups at the time point of 24 months

At the time point of 24 months, the response rates of the experimental and control groups were 45/54 (83.3%) and 23/28 (82.1%), respectively. In the experimental group, one patient succumbed to multiple metastases of bladder cancer and 5 patients died due to non-cancerous causes. In the control group, 2 patients succumbed to non-cancerous causes and 1 was lost to follow-up. In the experimental group, 8 patients (17.8%) indicated that their physical condition was worse compared to 1 year before, 11 (24.4%) indicated that their physical condition had improved compared to 1 year before and 26 (57.8%) observed no differences compared to 1 year before when they completed the questionnaires. In the control group, 14 patients (60.9%) indicated that their physical condition was worse compared to 1 year before, 7 (30.4%) indicated that their physical condition had improved compared to 1 year before and 2 (8.7%) observed no differences compared to 1 year before when they completed the questionnaires. Data from the SF-36 survey are provided in Table III and Fig. 3. The general health, social functioning, role-emotional functioning, mental health and QOL scores in the experimental group were significantly higher compared to those in the control group (P<0.05).

Figure 3.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental control groups at 24 months (*P<0.05). TMH, total mental health; TPH, total physical health; MH, mental health; RE, role-emotional functioning; SF, social functioning; VT, vitality; GH, general health; BP, bodily pain; RP, role-physical functioning; RF, physical functioning.

Table III.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 24 months.

Table III.

Comparison of data from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) between the experimental and control groups at 24 months.

ItemsExperimental group (n=45)Control group (n=23)P-value
Physical functioning23.07±3.4424.15±3.280.43
Role-physical functioning5.79±0.545.21±1.960.26
Bodily pain9.27±1.5410.33±2.170.56
General health19.63±7.2611.35±6.200.01
Vitality16.37±3.1914.28±5.170.06
Social functioning7.32±1.944.86±0.460.01
Role-emotional functioning3.92±0.813.12±0.420.01
Mental health23.17±3.0615.10±2.790.01
Overall health112.8±11.2395.41±9.860.01
  Total physical health56.13±5.3147.67±3.120.09
  Total mental health58.22±9.7141.47±4.290.01

Discussion

Urinary reconstruction is indispensable following radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer (5,12). In our institute (Yunnan Institute of Urology, China), orthotopic neobladder reconstruction procedures were performed when the patients had the appropriate indications for this type of surgery from the viewpoint of cancer control, as well as when the patients requested the surgery. However, we performed non-orthotopic neobladder procedures when the patients did not have the appropriate indications for the construction of an ileal neobladder. Due to the increasing number of patients receiving an orthotopic rather than a non-orthotopic neobladder following radical cystectomy, it is significant to accurately demonstrate the health-related QOL differences between the two procedures, in order to select the patient-appropriate type of urinary diversion, considering that they exhibit similar morbidity and mortality rates. Although QOL is increasingly recognized as an important outcome measure following treatment for urological malignancy, the QOL findings after a cystectomy remain a controversial subject.

The health-related QOL, as well as the micturition status and continence following a cystectomy, are important considerations in selecting the optimal treatment modality (13,14). Therefore, we investigated whether there were differences in QOL between the experimental and the control groups. Numerous questionnaires have been developed in order to evaluate the health-related QOL. The health-related QOL in patients with urinary reconstructions has been evaluated thus far using various types of questionnaires (15). The SF-36 score is extensively used worldwide and is considered to be accurate (16). Furthermore, it is a standard questionnaire that may be applied to patients as well as to healthy subjects. In addition, the questions may be easily answered within a short time and they are limited to the evaluation of basic issues regarding overall health.

Our data demonstrated that more patients perceived themselves as healthy following an orthotopic urinary diversion and their total health scores were higher compared to those of patients undergoing a non-orthotopic urinary diversion; however, there were no differences in the scores of physical functioning between the two groups. There were no statistical differences in the health-related QOL between the orthotopic and the non-orthotopic neobladder group; however, the functional results of orthotopic neobladder patients were satisfactory and consistent with those reported by other studies. In conclusion, the orthotopic neobladder reconstructive surgery may be performed on patients with the appropriate indications from the viewpoint of cancer control, particularly on patients concerned over a negative body image due to the presence of a urinary stoma. Our data may assist patients in the selection of the most appropriate treatment option. However, studies including larger patient samples may help elucidate the relative psychological benefits associated with various types of urinary tract reconstruction.

References

1. 

Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Pfeiffer C and Volkmer BG: Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: long-term results in 1100 patients. Eur Urol. 61:1039–1047. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Kübler H and Gschwend JE: Ileal neobladder in women with bladder cancer: cancer control and functional aspects. Curr Opin Urol. 21:478–482. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

3. 

Erber B, Schrader M, Miller K, et al: Morbidity and quality of life in bladder cancer patients following cystectomy and urinary diversion: a single-institution comparison of ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. ISRN Urol. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

4. 

Hashine K, Miura N, Numata K, Shirato A, Sumiyoshi Y and Kataoka M: Health-related quality of life after bladder preservation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int J Urol. 15:403–406. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5. 

Jeong IG, You D, Kim J, et al: Factors associated with nonorthotopic urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 30:815–820. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6. 

Philip J, Manikandan R, Venugopal S, Desouza J and Javle PM: Orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy - a quality-of-life based comparison. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 91:565–569. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7. 

Takenaka A, Hara I, Soga H, et al: Assessment of long-term quality of life in patients with orthotopic neobladder followed for more than 5 years. Int Urol Nephrol. 43:749–754. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

8. 

Cesarino CB, Beccaria LM, Aroni MM, Rodrigues LC and Pacheco Sda S: Quality of life of patients with implantable cardioverser-defibrillator: the usage of SF-36 questionnaire. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 26:238–243. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

9. 

Maurino J, Cordero L and Ballesteros J: The subjective well-being under neuroleptic scale - short version (SWN-K) and the SF-36 health survey as quality of life measures in patients with schizophrenia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 6:83–85. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10. 

McPherson A and Martin CR: A review of the measurement properties of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) to determine its suitability for use in an alcohol-dependent population. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. Mar 27–2012.(Epub ahead of print).

11. 

Wan C, Tu X, Messing S, et al: Development and validation of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases and its comparison with SF-36. J Pain Symptom Manage. 42:93–104. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12. 

Kang SG, Ko YH, Jang HA, et al: Initial experience of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal-urinary diversion: comparison with extracorporeal method. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 22:456–462. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

13. 

Goossens-Laan CA, Kil PJ, Ruud Bosch JL and De Vries J: Pre-diagnosis quality of life (QoL) in patients with hematuria: comparison of bladder cancer with other causes. Qual Life Res. Mar 30–2012.(Epub ahead of print).

14. 

Miyanaga N, Akaza H, Shinohara N, et al: Assessment of QOL and survival for patients undergoing radical cystectomy or bladder preservation for invasive bladder cancer. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 90:445–453. 1999.(In Japanese).

15. 

Ridolo E, Baiardini I, Meschi T, et al: Erratum to: HRQoL questionnaire evaluation in lactose intolerant patients with adverse reactions to foods. Intern Emerg Med. Feb 24–2012.(Epub ahead of print).

16. 

Velanovich V, Younga J, Bhandarkar V, et al: A single, global patient-centered measure from the SF-36 instrument to assess surgical outcomes and quality of life: a pilot study. World J Surg. 36:2045–2050. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Yang M, Wang H, Wang J and Ruan M: Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey. Mol Clin Oncol 1: 758-762, 2013.
APA
Yang, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., & Ruan, M. (2013). Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 1, 758-762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.125
MLA
Yang, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., Ruan, M."Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 1.4 (2013): 758-762.
Chicago
Yang, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., Ruan, M."Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 1, no. 4 (2013): 758-762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.125
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yang M, Wang H, Wang J and Ruan M: Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey. Mol Clin Oncol 1: 758-762, 2013.
APA
Yang, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., & Ruan, M. (2013). Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 1, 758-762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.125
MLA
Yang, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., Ruan, M."Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 1.4 (2013): 758-762.
Chicago
Yang, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., Ruan, M."Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 1, no. 4 (2013): 758-762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.125
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team