Expression of Topoisomerase II‑α protein in salivary gland tumors

  • Authors:
    • Asaf Shvero
    • Ohad Hilly
    • Golan Bubis
    • Yaniv Hamzany
    • Rumelia Koren
    • Lea Rath‑Wolfson
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 20, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1463
  • Pages:1064-1068
Metrics: HTML 0 views | PDF 0 views     Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations

Abstract

Salivary glands give rise to approximately 30 histological distinct tumor types, which results in a diagnostic challenge for the pathologist. The present retrospective, immunohistochemical study aimed to evaluate the expression of Topoisomerase II‑α, a nuclear enzyme, as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in benign and malignant salivary gland tumors, including leomorphic adenoma, muco­epidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma and carcinoma ex‑pleomorphic adenoma. A total of 59 cases of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors were included in the present study. Representative paraffin-embedded sections were immunostained for Topoisomerase II‑α (Topo II‑α). The expression level was semi‑quantified for each case and then correlated with the histological diagnosis using hematoxylin and eosin‑stained slides, grade of tumor and total survival. Significant differences were revealed between the expression level of Topo II‑α in pleomorphic adenoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (P<0.001), carcinoma ex‑pleomorphic adenoma (P<0.001), acinic cell carcinoma (P=0.005) and a group composed of all the malignant tumors (P<0.001). Cancer‑specific survival rates were insignificantly increased in tumors expressing low levels of Topo II‑α (P=0.464). Thus, the present study demonstrated different expression levels of Topo II‑α in benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. These differing expression levels may act as valuable biomarkers for the correct histological diagnosis. Further studies conducted on a larger scale may lead to even more conclusive results.

Introduction

Salivary glands give rise to no fewer than 30 histologically distinct tumor types. Over the years there has been some progress in clarifying specific causes of salivary gland cancer. The best known risk factor is that of radiation exposure as is evident in the increased risk of post-atomic bomb survivors and in patients who received therapeutic radiation (1). In the second half of the 20th century a considerable number of new entities of salivary gland tumor were added. These neoplasms are relatively uncommon, comprising <2% of all tumors in humans. Approximately 65–80% arise within the parotid gland, 10% within the submandibular gland and the remainder in the minor salivary glands (25).

In the present study we investigated pleomorphic adenoma (benign tumor), mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma. The histological diagnosis of salivary gland tumors was performed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides. The results showed different expression levels of Topo II-α in benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. These differing expression levels may act as valuable biomarkers for the correct histological diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Topoisomerase II-α

Topoisomerase is a nuclear enzyme important for DNA replication, transcription, recombination, and mitosis. Topoisomerases introduce supercoils that release the strain caused by over winding. Type I Topoisomerases relax supercoiled structures while type II Topoisomerase (also known as DNA gyrase) can introduce negative supercoiling through coupling of ATP hydrolysis. Therefore, negative supercoiling is introduced by Topoisomerase II and relaxed by Topoisomerase I (6). Topoisomerase II has two isoenzymes, isoenzyme α exists only in proliferating cells and has been shown to be a marker for cell proliferation in normal and neoplastic cells (68). In addition, it is involved in different signaling pathways related to the cell cycle and apoptosis, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK2) (9), NF-κB (10), and others. Topoisomerase II-α (Topo II-α) has been extensively researched for its role as a molecular target of chemotherapy agents. Several studies have suggested that Topo II-α expression is related to response to anthracycline treatment for breast cancer (1113), renal medullary carcinoma (14), ovarian carcinoma (15), salivary gland tumors (16,17), acute myeloid leukemia (18), Hodgkin's lymphoma (19), colorectal cancer (20), hepatocellular carcinoma (21), gallbladder carcinoma (22), prostate carcinoma (23), and other malignant tumors (24). Thus, these cancer types benefit from using Topo II-α as a prognostic marker, and also for individual tailored therapy.

Few articles available regarding the expression of Topo II-α in salivary gland tumors. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether the expression of Topo II-α can be used as a marker to differentiate between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors, and as a prognostic marker. To the best of our knowledge, our research is the most extensive one to examine the expression of Topo II-α in salivary gland tumors.

Patients

A total of 59 consecutive cases of salivary gland tumors, 34 women and 25 men (median age, 57 years), diagnosed at ‘Rabin Medical Center’ during the years 1991–2010, were examined. All the tumors were diagnosed following a superficial or radical parotidectomy, except one which was diagnosed after a base of tongue biopsy. Surgical specimens were obtained directly from the operation room, fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin for examination in conventional H&E staining. The specimens were reviewed in order to confirm the diagnosis.

Immunohistochemistry

The representative paraffin embedded blocks were cut into 3–5 µm sections. Immunostaining was carried out using an antibody commercial kit (cat. no. NCL-TOPOIIAp; Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, England), containing a mouse anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody against a recombinant protein corresponding to the C-terminal region of the Topo II-α molecule. The procedure was performed with an automated immunohistochemistry system (Ventana medical systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. High-grade colon carcinoma specimens were used as control for stain adequacy. Sections of positive and negative control tissues and non-malignant tissue of the resected salivary gland specimen were also included.

Microscopy and staining evaluation

To assess the level of Topo II-α expression, five representative high power fields (×400) were examined. For each field, the percentage of positively stained nuclei was registered along with the intensity of the stain. The intensity was rated 0–3 (0, for no nuclear stain; 1, for the weakest nuclear stain; and 3, for the strongest nuclear stain) in comparison with the control stain. A score was calculated by multiplying the intensity of each field with the percentage of positively stained cells and then by a factor of 100 (i.e., if 20% of the nuclei in the slide was stained with an intensity of 2 the slide got a score of 40) (25). The mean score of five fields was named ‘Topo II-α index’ of the specimen. This was conducted by two independent observers (L.R.W and R.K.), and inter-observer concordance was >95%.

Statistical analysis

Our main aim was to assess Topo II-α expression as a diagnostic and prognostic marker. Sensitivity and specificity of the method in diagnosing malignant tumors were calculated, using the pathologic diagnosis as the ‘gold standard’.

Survival curves were calculated for two groups divided by a cut-off Topo II-α index. One group comprised malignant tumors with an index above the cut-off index, while the second group comprised cases of malignant tumors with an index below the cut-off index. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method and the log rank test was used to test the difference between them to find the most significant cut-off index. Comparisons between the Topo II-α index of the two different groups (malignant vs. benign) were carried out using the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine clinicopathological characteristics associated with a high expression of Topo II-α. Data were arranged and analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 16 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results are presented as a mean and standard deviation. The statistical significance level was set to 0.05 (two-tailed).

Ethics approval

The present study was approved by the local Ethics Committee in Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel (ministry of health approval no. 920100120). Procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For retrospective studies formal consent is not required.

Results

Patients

Clinicopathological data from 59 patients (34 men and 25 women) with salivary gland tumors were included in the present study, and the corresponding specimens were investigated for Topo II-α expression. The median age of the overall patient group was 57 years (interquartile range, 44–68 years) (Table I).

Table I.

Clinicopathological data of the study cohort.

Table I.

Clinicopathological data of the study cohort.

Histological typeNo. of casesSex (% male)Age, years (median, IQR)Tumor size, cm (mean ± SD)Positive surgical margins (%)
Pleomorphic adenoma184456, 42–65.32.8±1.20
Acinic cell carcinoma133359, 43.5–693.1±0.750
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma152352, 33.5–61.52.1±1.525
Carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma136962, 54–693.0±1.0100
Total594257, 44–682.8±1.225

[i] SD, standard deviation; IQR, intra-quartile range.

Histology

Of the total 59 tumors, 18 (30%) were pleomorphic adenoma, 15 (24%) were mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 13 (22%) were acinic cell carcinoma, and 13 (22%) were carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma. All the tumors were stained for Topo II-α. Nuclear stain was considered positive (Figs. 1 and 2).

Topo II-α expression

The mean expression levels of Topo II-α, presented as the Topo II-α index, are provided in Table II. The highest expression of Topo II-α was in the carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma tumors, with a range of 0.4–38.0. A significant difference (P<0.05) was found between the mean expression of Topo II-α in the normal salivary gland tissue and pleomorphic adenoma (Fig. 1) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (P<0.001) (Fig. 2), acinic cell carcinoma (P<0.005), carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (P<0.001), and a group comprising all the malignant tumors (P<0.001). A Topo II-α index of 0.4 yielded a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 94% in differentiating the pleomorphic adenoma group from the group comprising all the malignant tumors.

Table II.

Topo II-α index according to the histological type.

Table II.

Topo II-α index according to the histological type.

Histological typenTopo II-α index (mean ± SD)
Normal salivary gland160.50±0.30
Pleomorphic adenoma180.13±0.20
Acinic cell carcinoma131.81±2.58
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma156.41±10.91
Carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma138.16±12.55

Association between tumor grade and Topo II-α index. Table III shows the association between tumor grade and Topo II-α index. As the acinic cell carcinoma grading was not uniformly accepted, this tumor was excluded from this part of the analysis.

Table III.

Grade and Topo II-α index summation in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma.

Table III.

Grade and Topo II-α index summation in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma.

Histological typeGradeNo. of casesMean topo II-α index
MucoepidermoidLow62.13
CarcinomaIntermediate and high98.91
Carcinoma ex-pleomorphicLow21.1
adenomaHigh119.45
Survival

The mean follow-up for the entire cohort with malignant tumors was 9.1 years (range, 1.5–15). A total of 13 patients with malignant tumors died of their disease after an average of 4.5 years (range, 0.7–12.8). We searched for the most significant cut-off Topo II-α index to yield prognostic significance but we were limited by the relatively small study group and by other confounding clinic-pathological parameters known to have prognostic significance (like age and tumor size). Serial calculations were performed in order to find the most significant cut-off index thich was 2.0. Between the two groups (above and below the cut-off index) there was no significant difference in all tested clinicopathologic parameters (Table IV). The 5-year cancer-specific survival among the patients with an index ≥2.0 was 68% (20 patients), compared with 85% for those with an index <2.0 (21 patients) (Fig. 3). This difference was not statistically significant (log rank test, P=0.464).

Table IV.

Clinicopathological data of low and high Topo II-α index among malignant tumors.

Table IV.

Clinicopathological data of low and high Topo II-α index among malignant tumors.

Topo II- α index

<2.0≥2.0P-value
Number of patientsa2120
Age (average in years)52.159.50.164
Topo II-α index (average ± SD)0.62±0.5210.6±12.3<0.001
Tumor size (average in cm ± SD)2.5±0.942.9±1.20.241
Positive surgical margins61%61%0.981

a 5-year cancer-specific survival.

Discussion

In this research, we set out to study the expression of Topo II-α, in several salivary gland tumors. We found a statistically significant higher expression of Topo II-α in the malignant tumors group compared with the benign tumor pleomorphic adenoma, with an index of 0.4 having high sensitivity (76%) and specificity (94%) for malignancy. In a study by Maruya et al (17), a higher expression of the enzyme was demonstrated in malignant salivary gland tumors in comparison to common benign tumors, but the difference was not statistically significant due to a small study group (up to 7 cases of each malignant tumor).

Our results show that the enzyme is expressed at different levels in each type of malignant salivary gland tumor, the highest expression was observed in the carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma group. This tumor is considered aggressive among salivary gland tumors, while the other two tumors we assessed are considered low grade tumors (2), and showed lower indices of the enzyme. Carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma originates from the benign tumor Pleomorphic Adenoma, and can develop after decades in which the benign tumor was steady. And so, proper and efficient follow-up of patients suffering from pleomorphic adenoma, can lead to early diagnosis of the malignant transformation. Furthermore, in most cases, the malignant tumor presents with advanced disease stage III/IV, which gives us further motivation to early detection. These findings lead us to the conclusion that Topo II-α expression may be used as a clinical tool for early detection of malignant transformation, similar to previous researches conducted on p53 (26).

In addition, in the carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma group (13 cases), we found 2 cases of low grade tumors, in which Topo II-α index was relatively low (1.1 in average) in comparison with the other 11 cases, which were of high grade, and showed much higher average index of 9.45. In the research of Maryua et al (17) their 3 cases of Carcinoma Ex-Pleomorphic Adenoma, had all very high Topo II-α expression. The expression of the enzyme in these tumors can imply on its biological behavior, and help us understand the nature of the tumor. In the future, it may lead to tailored treatment plans according to the tumor's immunohistochemical profile, and encourage research on targeted therapy, as is already carried out in other malignancies such as breast, colon, and lung cancer.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, being the most common malignant salivary gland tumor, is a subject of vast research. Many studies were conducted in order to clarify its genetic and morphologic heterogeneity and several immunohistochemical and genetic markers have been offered as prognostic and diagnostic markers (27,28). Our results suggest Topo II-α as a differentiation marker between this tumor and pleomorphic adenoma. Furthermore, its expression may help us shed light on the biological behavior of the tumor. In addition, we found Topo II-α variable expressions in the different grades, similar to those results published by Maruya et al. In light of these results, it is possible that the role of Topo II-α in this type of tumor is complex.

The expression of Topo II-α in acinic cell carcinoma was the lowest among all malignant tumors we tested. In general, this tumor is considered to be of low grade, with slow and indolent course. Therefore, the relatively low level of Topo II-α expression matches the biological behavior of the tumor. Maruya et al (17) also found low levels of expression in this tumor type.

Survival rates were found to be higher in malignant tumors expressing low levels of Topo II-α (index less than 2.0), though not statistically significant. Higher cut-off values yielded significantly different survival rates, but also created groups with significant differences in other clinico-pathologic parameters known to affect prognosis (like age and tumor size). It is possible that with more homogeneous, larger studies, the level of Topo II-α expression may be proven to be of prognostic significance.

In the adjacent normal salivary gland, we found low levels of Topo II-α expression, with 93% of samples exhibiting some level of positive staining. These levels were higher than the ones measured in pleomorphic adenoma. We did not find other comparative studies regarding these data, and we cannot suggest any conclusions for this finding.

The present study is limited by its retrospective nature, its relatively small study group and by lack of homogeneity in the study group.

To conclude, in salivary gland tumors, Topo II-α is expressed in different levels at different histological types. It may be used in the histological analysis of these tumors for differentiating benign from malignant tumors. A Topo II-α index ≥2.0 is insignificantly associated with lower 5-year cancer specific survival rates. Salivary gland tumors with high Topo II-α index may warrant more aggressive modalities of therapy. Further studies need to be conducted for more conclusive results.

References

1 

Zarbo RJ: Salivary gland neoplasia: A review for the practicing pathologist. Mod Pathol. 15:298–323. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Cheuk W and Chan JKC: Salivary Gland TumorsFletcher CDM: Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; pp. 239–326. 2007

3 

Lingen MW: Diseases of organ systems, salivary glandsKumar V, Abbas AK and Fausto N: Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; pp. 790–795. 2005

4 

Rosai J: Major and Minor Salivary GlandsRosai J: Surgical Pathology. 9th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; pp. 873–915. 2004

5 

Shvero A and Hadar T: Pathology of selected tumors of salivary gland. Med Connect. 6:29–34. 2011.

6 

Berg JM, Tymoczko JL and Stryer L: DNA replication, recombination and repairBerg JM, Tymoczko JL and Stryer L: Biochemistry. 5th edition. New York: W.H.Freeman & Co; pp. 1119–1120. 2002

7 

Turley H, Comley M, Houlbrook S, Nozaki N, Kikuchi A, Hickson ID, Gatter K and Harris AL: The distribution and expression of the two isophorms of DNA topoisomerase II in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Br J Cancer. 75:1340–1346. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hsiang YH, Wu HY and Liu LF: Proliferation-dependent regulation of DNA topoisomerase II in cultured human cells. Cancer Res. 48:3230–3235. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Shapiro PS, Whalen AM, Tolwinski NS, Wilsbacher J, Froelich-Ammon SJ, Garcia M, Osheroff N and Ahn NG: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase activates topoisomerase IIalpha through a mechanism independent of phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 19:3551–3560. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Tabata M, Tabata R, Grabowski DR, Bukowski RM, Ganapathi MK and Ganapathi R: Roles of NF-kappaB and 26 S proteasome in apoptotic cell death induced by topoisomerase I and II Poisons in human non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 276:8029–8036. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Nikolényi A, Uhercsák G, Csenki M, Hamar S, Csörgo E, Tánczos E, Thurzó L, Brodowicz T, Wagnerova M and Kahán Z: Tumor topoisomerase II alpha protein expression and outcome after adjuvant dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Pathol Oncol Res. 18:61–68. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Gómez HL, Pinto JA, Olivera M, Vidaurre T, Doimi FD, Vigil CE, Velarde RG, Abugattas JE, Alarcón E and Vallejos CS: Topoisomerase II-α as a predictive factor of response to therapy with anthracyclines in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast. 20:39–45. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Bartlett JM, Munro AF, Dunn JA, McConkey C, Jordan S, Twelves CJ, Cameron DA, Thomas J, Campbell FM, Rea DW, et al: Predictive markers of anthracycline benefit: A prospectively planned analysis of the UK national epirubicin adjuvant trial (NEAT/BR9601). Lancet Oncol. 11:266–274. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Schaeffer EM, Guzzo TJ, Furge KA, Netto G, Westphal M, Dykema K, Yang X, Zhou M, Teh BT and Pavlovich CP: Renal medullary carcinoma: Molecular, pathological and clinical evidence for treatment with topoisomerase-inhibiting therapy. BJU Int. 106:62–65. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Ferrandina G, Petrillo M, Carbone A, Zannoni G, Martinelli E, Prisco M, Pignata S, Breda E, Savarese A and Scambia G: Prognostic role of topoisomerase-IIalpha in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 98:1910–1915. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Hirabayashi S: Immunohistochemical detection of DNA topoisomerase type II alpha and Ki-67 in adenoid cystic carcinoma and pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland. J Oral Pathol Med. 28:131–136. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Maruya S, Shirasaki T, Nagaki T, Kakehata S, Kurotaki H, Mizukami H and Shinkawa H: Differential expression of topoisomerase IIalpha protein in salivary gland carcinomas: Histogenetic and prognostic implications. BMC Cancer. 9:722009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Chen CC, Gau JP, You JY, Lee KD, Yu YB, Lu CH, Lin JT, Lan C, Lo WH, Liu JM and Yang CF: Prognostic significance of beta-catenin and topoisomerase IIalpha in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 84:87–92. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Doussis-Anagnostopoulou IA, Vassilakopoulos TP, Thymara I, Korkolopoulou P, Angelopoulou MK, Siakantaris MP, Kokoris SI, Dimitriadou EM, Kalpadakis C, Matzouranis M, et al: Topoisomerase IIalpha expression as an independent prognostic factor in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 14:1759–1766. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Coss A, Tosetto M, Fox EJ, Sapetto-Rebow B, Gorman S, Kennedy BN, Lloyd AT, Hyland JM, O'Donoghue DP, Sheahan K, et al: Increased topoisomerase IIalpha expression in colorectal cancer is associated with advanced disease and chemotherapeutic resistance via inhibition of apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 276:228–238. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wong N, Yeo W, Wong WL, Wong NL, Chan KY, Mo FK, Koh J, Chan SL, Chan AT, Lai PB, et al: TOP2A overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with early age onset, shorter patients survival and chemoresistance. Int J Cancer. 124:644–652. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Washiro M, Ohtsuka M, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Sugimoto T, Seki N and Miyazaki M: Upregulation of topoisomerase IIalpha expression in advanced gallbladder carcinoma: A potential chemotherapeutic target. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 134:793–801. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hughes C, Murphy A, Martin C, Fox E, Ring M, Sheils O, Loftus B and O'Leary J: Topoisomerase II-alpha expression increases with increasing Gleason score and with hormone insensitivity in prostate carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 59:721–724. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Dekel Y, Frede T, Kugel V, Neumann G, Rassweiler J and Koren R: Human DNA topoisomerase II-alpha expression in laparoscopically treated renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 14:271–274. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Rath-Wolfson L, Purim O, Ram E, Morgenstern S, Koren R and Brenner B: Expression of estrogen receptor β1 in colorectal cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological variables. Oncol Rep. 27:2017–2022. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Ohtaké S, Cheng J, Ida H, Suzuki M, Ohshiro K, Zhang W and Saku T: Precancerous foci in pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland: Recognition of focal carcinoma and atypical tumor cells by P53 immunohistochemistry. J Oral Pathol Med. 31:590–597. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Nguyen LH, Black MJ, Hier M, Chauvin P and Rochon L: HER2/neu and Ki-67 as prognostic indicators in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands. J Otolaryngol. 32:328–331. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Shemirani N, Osipov V, Kolker A, Khampang P and Kerschner JE: Expression of mucin (MUC) genes in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 121:167–170. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December 2017
Volume 7 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Shvero, A., Hilly, O., Bubis, G., Hamzany, Y., Koren, R., & Rath‑Wolfson, L. (2017). Expression of Topoisomerase II‑α protein in salivary gland tumors. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 7, 1064-1068. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1463
MLA
Shvero, A., Hilly, O., Bubis, G., Hamzany, Y., Koren, R., Rath‑Wolfson, L."Expression of Topoisomerase II‑α protein in salivary gland tumors". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 7.6 (2017): 1064-1068.
Chicago
Shvero, A., Hilly, O., Bubis, G., Hamzany, Y., Koren, R., Rath‑Wolfson, L."Expression of Topoisomerase II‑α protein in salivary gland tumors". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 7, no. 6 (2017): 1064-1068. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1463