Application of a co‑expression network for the analysis of aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines to predict the clinical outcome of patients
- Ling Guo
- Kun Zhang
- Zhitong Bing
Published online on: September 25, 2017
Copyright: © Guo et al.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Metrics: PDF 0 views
| HTML 0 views
Breast cancer metastasis is a demanding problem in clinical treatment of patients with breast cancer. It is necessary to examine the mechanisms of metastasis for developing therapies. Classification of the aggressiveness of breast cancer is an important issue in biological study and for clinical decisions. Although aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cells can be easily distinguished among different cell lines, it is very difficult to distinguish in clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to use the gene expression analysis from breast cancer cell lines to predict clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer. Weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA) is a powerful method to account for correlations between genes and extract co‑expressed modules of genes from large expression datasets. Therefore, WGCNA was applied to explore the differences in sub‑networks between aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines. The greatest difference topological overlap networks in both groups include potential information to understand the mechanisms of aggressiveness. The results show that the blue and red modules were significantly associated with the biological processes of aggressiveness. The sub‑network, which consisted of TMEM47, GJC1, ANXA3, TWIST1 and C19orf33 in the blue module, was associated with an aggressive phenotype. The sub‑network of LOC100653217, CXCL12, SULF1, DOK5 and DKK3 in the red module was associated with a non‑aggressive phenotype. In order to validate the hazard ratio of these genes, the prognostic index was constructed to integrate them and examined using data from the Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Patients with breast cancer from TCGA in the high‑risk group had a significantly shorter overall survival time compared with patients in the low‑risk group (hazard ratio=1.231, 95% confidence interval=1.058‑1.433, P=0.0071, by the Wald test). A similar result was produced from the GEO database. The findings may provide a novel strategy for measuring cancer aggressiveness in patients with breast cancer.