L‑mimosine induces caspase‑9‑mediated apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells

  • Authors:
    • Yiwen Xu
    • Lin Cai
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 9, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8403
  • Pages: 4695-4701
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

L-mimosine is a rare plant amino acid extracted from Mimosa or Leucaena spp., and it has been reported to exhibit antitumor activity in a number of types of cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified. In the present study, the effect of L‑mimosine was investigated in human osteosarcoma cells. A Cell Counting Kit‑8 assay and flow cytometry were used for toxicity detection. Hoechst staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in addition to western blot analysis, were used for the examination of the associated mechanisms. The results of the present study indicated that L‑mimosine significantly inhibited cell proliferation by inducing cellular apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. The Hoechst staining results and TEM revealed that nuclear damage increased with the concentration increase in L‑mimosine, as did the formation of apoptotic bodies. Additionally, the results of the western blot analysis confirmed that the treatment of cells with L‑mimosine was accompanied by increasing expression of cleaved caspase‑9. L‑mimosine‑induced apoptosis was inhibited by the caspase‑9 inhibitor Z‑LEHD‑FMK. In addition, the extracellular signal‑regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway was suppressed following treatment with L‑mimosine. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that L‑mimosine induced apoptosis via the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. The ERK signaling pathway was indicated to be an additional mechanism underlying apoptosis induction. The results provided evidence for the use of L‑mimosine as a promising candidate for osteosarcoma therapy.

Introduction

Osteosarcoma, the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents, is considered to be a significant potential threat to the health of teenagers (1). Osteosarcoma originates from mesenchymal tissue, and frequently occurs in the metaphyseal region of growing bones. With its characteristics of rapid growth and marked invasiveness, osteosarcoma is highly malignant and prone to lung metastases. Pulmonary micrometastasis may be observed in ~80% of patients at the time of diagnosis, which may be the cause of the low survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma (2,3). At present, the treatment for osteosarcoma is primarily surgery combined with preoperative chemotherapy (2). Although progress has been made in the treatment of osteosarcoma, the 5-year survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma is only ~30% (2). It is very important to identify novel therapeutic targets and develop effective drugs for the treatment of osteosarcoma.

L-mimosine, a plant amino acid which is extracted from Leucaena leucocephala or Mimosa pudica, is a type of iron chelator and prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (4,5). L-mimosine has been reported to exhibit anti-tumor activity in a number of types of tumor, including pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer (46); however, the effect of L-mimosine in osteosarcoma has not been reported, and the underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified. In the present study, two osteosarcoma cell lines, MG63 and U2OS, were used to examine the antitumor activity of L-mimosine in osteosarcoma. In addition, the associated mechanisms were further investigated.

Materials and methods

Reagents

The following reagents were used in the present study: L-mimosine and Z-LEHD-FMK (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany); SCH772984 [specific inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)] (MedChem Express, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA); fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA); RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA); Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences); DMEM/F-12 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA); Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc., Kumamoto, Japan); Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis kit [Hangzhou Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China]; Hoechst staining kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China); cleaved caspase-9 (cat. no. 9929), cleaved caspase-3 (cat. no. 9929), cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) (cat. no. 9929), apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 (Bcl-2) (cat. no. 9941), apoptosis regulator BAX (BAX) (cat. no. 9942), ERK (cat. no. 9902), phosphorylated (p)-ERK (cat. no. 9910) and GAPDH (cat. no. 5174) antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); and cleaved caspase-8 antibody (Novus Biologicals, LLC, Littleton, CO, USA). The secondary antibody was a donkey anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. 925–32213; LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).

Cell culture

Human osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS, which were originally purchased from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), were conserved in the laboratory, and were respectively cultured in DMEM and RPMI-1640, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 20 µg/ml antibiotics (ampicilin and kanamycin), at 37°C and 5% CO2. Human normal osteoblast cells hFOB 1.19 were obtained from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and was cultured in DMEM/F-12, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 20 µg/ml antibiotics (ampicilin and kanamycin), at 33.5°C and 5% CO2.

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were harvested and adjusted to 2×104 cells/ml, and seeded in 96-well plates. A total of three replicates were performed in every group, and a blank control was additionally set up. A concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used for treatment. Following 24, 48 and 72 h of culture, 10 µl CCK-8 was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and the absorbance value was measured at 450 nm. The experiment was repeated three times independently.

Flow cytometry

A concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used for treatment for 24 h. Cells in 6-well plate at a density of 1×104/well were collected and washed twice with cold PBS. An Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit was used for detection. The cells were resuspended in Annexin-V binding buffer, and stained with 5 µl Annexin-V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and 10 µl PI in the dark for 15 min at room temperature. Fluorescence was analyzed on a FACSCanto II spectrometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and the software used for the analysis was CellQuest Pro (BD Biosciences). Cells stained with FITC/PI were counted as apoptotic cells. The experiment was repeated three times independently.

Hoechst staining

Cells were harvested and seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 1×104 cells/well, a concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used for treatment for 24 h. Cells were washed with PBS once, 1 ml/well Hoechst was added, and the plate was placed in the dark for a 30 min incubation. Subsequently, the Hoechst was removed and the cells were washed with PBS twice, and observed with a fluorescence microscope at a magnification of ×40. The staining results were quantified using Image Studio v3.1 software (LI-COR Biosciences) and the experiment was repeated three times independently.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Cells were harvested and seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 1×104 cells/well, and a concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used for treatment for 24 h. Cells were placed in 4°C pre-cooled 2.5% glutaraldehyde and fixed for 2 h. Cells were washed 3 times with PBS buffer, fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C, and washed with buffer three times. The cells were soaked with gradient ethanol, acetone dehydrated and embedded with Epon 812 at 60°C for 24 h. Double staining was performed with uranyl acetate and lead citrate at room temperature for 20 min. Sections were observed under TEM and images were captured.

Western blotting

A concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used for treatment for 24 h. Z-LEHD-FMK (40 µM) was used for caspase-9 inhibtion; and 5 nM SCH772984 was used for ERK inhibition. Cells were collected and seeded into 6-well plates, and a concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used for treatment for 24 h. Cells were harvested and lysed in a radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail and 2 mM dithiothreitol. A biconchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to determine the protein concentration in each sample. The loading quantity of samples per lane was 30 µg. Lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel, transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. The PVDF membrane was blocked with the blocking solution (5% milk) at room temperature for 2 h. And then immunoblotted with primary antibodies (1:1,000). Following immunoblotting with secondary antibodies (1:10,000), the membranes were scanned with the Odyssey CLx Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences). The western blot bands were quantified using Image Studio v3.1 software, and the experiment was repeated three times independently.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test with SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Effect of L-mimosine on the proliferation of the osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS

In order to evaluate the in vitro effect of L-mimosine on the proliferation of the osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS, the CCK-8 method was used to assess cell viability (Fig. 1). A concentration gradient of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) was used to treat the osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS for 24, 48 and 72 h. The results demonstrated that L-mimosine exhibited anti-proliferative effects in human osteosarcoma cells, and the effects were observed to be concentration-dependent (Fig. 1A and B). The results indicated that the cell line MG63 was more sensitive to L-mimosine compared with U2OS. In addition, the toxicity of L-mimosine on human normal osteoblasts was assessed in the present study. The human normal osteoblast cell line hFOB 1.19 was chosen as the normal control in the CCK-8 assay to evaluate the toxicity of L-mimosine. The results demonstrated that L-mimosine was less toxic to normal human osteoblasts, exerting a weak inhibitory effect on proliferation (Fig. 1C).

Effect of L-mimosine on the apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS

To test the in vitro effect of L-mimosine on the apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS, a flow cytometry experiment was performed with gradient concentrations of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400 and 800 µM) incubated for 24 h. The results demonstrated that the apoptosis rate of the cells increased with the increase in the concentration of L-mimosine, and that the effect was therefore concentration dependent (Fig. 1). The results demonstrated that L-mimosine exerted a pro-apoptotic effect on human osteosarcoma cells, and that MG63 cells were more sensitive to L-mimosine (Fig. 1). In addition, human normal osteoblast hFOB 1.19 cells were selected as the normal control in the flow cytometry assay to evaluate the toxicity of L-mimosine. The results demonstrated that L-mimosine was less toxic to normal human osteoblasts, exerting a weak effect on apoptosis (Fig. 1D).

Nuclear damage in MG63 cells increases with the increase in L-mimosine concentration

The flow cytometry assay illustrated marked apoptosis following treatment with gradient concentrations of L-mimosine; the effect was most notable in the MG63 cell line. In order to further confirm this result, the nuclear damage induced by L-mimosine was examined in the more sensitive MG63 cell line using Hoechst staining (Fig. 2). The cells in the control group exhibited weak blue fluorescence, and the apoptotic cells exhibited membrane permeability, which was observed as bright blue fluorescence. The experimental results demonstrated that with the increased concentration of L-mimosine (0, 200, 400, 800 µM), the number of nuclei appearing with bright blue fluorescence increased, indicating that the number of apoptotic cells increased.

Ultrastructural alterations in MG63 cells treated with L-mimosine

Hoechst staining in the previous experiment demonstrated that the apoptosis of MG63 cells was markedly induced by L-mimosine. In order to understand the alterations in the cell during apoptosis, TEM was used for the observation of the ultrastructural alterations in MG63 treated with L-mimosine. Under TEM observation (Fig. 3), the control group of MG63 displayed varied forms, a large nucleus and an imbalance in the nucleus-cytoplasm ratio, with an intact nuclear membrane, prominent nucleoli and evenly distributed nuclear chromatin (Fig. 3A). By contrast, the L-mimosine-treated group appeared with typical apoptosis morphological features, including cell shrinkage, cytoplasm condensation, pyknotic nuclei and a lack of nucleoli (Fig. 3B), and apoptotic bodies were observed (Fig. 3C; white arrow).

L-mimosine regulated apoptosis related proteins in MG63 cells

To investigate the apoptotic effect of L-mimosine, western blotting was performed (Fig. 4). As presented in Fig. 4A, cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase-9 and cleaved caspase-3 exhibited increased expression as the concentration of L-mimosine increased, while the expression of cleaved caspase-8 did not notably alter. Attenuated expression of Bcl-2 and increased expression of BAX were observed in MG63 cells treated with gradient concentrations of L-mimosine. Additionally, it is known that xenobiotics may alter cellular functions, including proliferation, the cell cycle and apoptosis, by affecting cell survival pathways; consequently, the present study further examined the signaling pathways associated with L-mimosine. As presented in Fig. 4A, L-mimosine reduced the levels of ERK and p-ERK in a concentration-dependent manner. The role of L-mimosine in this signaling pathway was further confirmed by the ERK signaling specific inhibitor SCH772984. As presented in Fig. 4C, the suppressed ERK signaling pathway following treatment with L-mimosine suggested this pathway be an additional mechanism for apoptosis induction.

According to the results of the western blot analysis, it was hypothesized that the treatment of cells with L-mimosine was accompanied by an increase in cleaved caspase-9 expression. The present study assessed whether L-mimosine-induced apoptosis was inhibited by the caspase-9 inhibitor Z-LEHD-FMK. As presented in Fig. 4B, the results suggested that L-mimosine induced apoptosis through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.

Discussion

L-mimosine is a rare plant amino acid extracted from Mimosa or Leucaena spp. The molecular formula of L-mimosine is α-amino-β-N-[3-hydroxy-4-pyridone]-propionic acid, C8H10N2O4. The molecular weight is 198.2. L-mimosine is structurally different from other commonly used anti-cancer drugs, and has a high degree of similarity to the structure of thymine (7,8). Due to the particular chemical structure of L-mimosine and its inhibitory effects on mammalian DNA replication, L-mimosine is used as a type of cell cycle synchronization drug in experiments, in addition to the study of the induction of tumor cell death. Previous studies have demonstrated the cytotoxicity of L-mimosine against a number of types of of tumor cell line. The sensitivity of L-mimosine in numerous human tumor cell lines was detected and the possible mechanisms were examined. Studies have reported that L-mimosine is a reversible cell cycle inhibitor in mammalian cells, which acts on the G1/S phase of the cell cycle (9,10). In addition, L-mimosine may interfere with the initiation of DNA replication and the extension of the replication chain (7,11,12). However, the exact mechanism of action of L-mimosine remains unclear. Mechanisms which have previously been reported include: Effectively preventing DNA synthesis by blocking the late G1 phase (13); interfering with the synthesis of histone H1 kinase (14,15); and upregulating cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 protein expression (8,1618).

The question of whether L-mimosine is a reversible cell cycle inhibitor has remained controversial due to a number of reasons, including different research methods or experimental conditions, and differences among different species and different cells in previous studies. Cell type is one of the factors which determines whether cells are prone to apoptosis (19); for example, cell lines which are sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents are prone to apoptosis (20), while apoptosis is difficult to induce in certain cell lines following treatment with chemotherapeutic agents (21). Previously, researchers have reported the pro-apoptotic effect of L-mimosine in a number of types of cancer (4,6,17,22), including pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer. However, when induced by L-mimosine, the effects on these tumors are different. Therefore, the present study sought to investigate whether L-mimosine may have a pro-apoptotic effect on osteosarcoma cells. The present study used two different types of osteosarcoma cell line, MG63 and U2OS.

The present study tested the effect of L-mimosine on osteosarcoma cell proliferation. The results of the CCK-8 assay indicated that L-mimosine inhibited osteosarcoma cell proliferation, and that the inhibitory effect was dose-dependent. Subsequently, apoptosis was assessed in osteosarcoma cells induced by L-mimosine. The Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining assay demonstrated that L-mimosine induced osteosarcoma cell apoptosis, and that the induction effect was dose-dependent. Previous studies reported that L-mimosine inhibited tumor cell proliferation by inducing tumor cell cycle arrest (17,23). In addition, it is reported L-mimosine inhibited tumor cell proliferation by altering the expression of proliferation-associated genes (4). In the present study, it was hypothesized that L-mimosine inhibited osteosarcoma cell proliferation through the induction of cellular apoptosis.

Apoptosis is characterized by membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation, DNA damage and fragmentation of the cell into membrane-bound apoptotic bodies (24). Subsequently, it was observed that the apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells was caused by DNA damage, via a Hoechst assay and TEM. In the Hoechst assay, the damaged nuclei were increased with the increase in L-mimosine concentration. When observed under TEM, the L-mimosine treated group exhibited typical morphological features of apoptosis: Cell shrinkage, cytoplasm condensation, nuclear pyknosis and a lack of nucleoli, in addition to apoptotic body formation.

Cellular apoptosis induced by L-mimosine was confirmed by western blot analysis of apoptosis-associated proteins. The caspases belong to a family of highly conserved aspartate-specific cysteine proteases, and they constitute important components of the apoptotic pathway (25,26). PARP, a type of DNA repair enzyme, is recognized to be the cleavage substrate of caspase. PARP is thought to be an important indicator of apoptosis, and is generally considered to be an indicator of caspase-3 activation. Bcl-2, encoded by the BCL2 gene, is the key member of the Bcl-2 protein family and negatively regulates cellular apoptosis (27). Bax protein, another apoptosis regulator belonging to the Bcl-2 protein family, promotes apoptosis by binding to the Bcl-2 protein (28). The expression of the proteins mentioned above was detected when cells were treated with gradient concentrations of L-mimosine. The expression of cleaved PARP and cleaved caspase-3 was increased as the concentration of L-mimosine increased. Attenuated expression of Bcl-2 and increased expression of BAX were observed as the concentration of L-mimosine increased.

It is known that cellular apoptosis is mediated through two principal pathways: The extrinsic (death receptor-mediated) and intrinsic (mitochondrial-mediated) pathways (29). Caspase-8 is important for the initiation of apoptosis via death receptors, as its recruitment to and activation at the death-inducing signaling complex is the decisive step for the initiation of the caspase cascade, leading to apoptosis (30). Caspase-9 is the apoptotic initiator protease of the intrinsic, or mitochondrial, apoptotic pathway (31). In the present study, with the increase in the concentration of L-mimosine, cleaved caspase-9 exhibited increased expression, while the expression alteration of cleaved caspase-8 was not apparent, indicating that the intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptotic pathway was induced by L-mimosine in osteosarcoma cells. This hypothesis was additionally confirmed by treatment with the caspase-9 inhibitor Z-LEHD-FMK.

Xenobiotics may alter cell survival pathways and cause alterations in cell proliferation, the cell cycle and apoptosis (32), and the results of the present study further demonstrated that the ERK signaling pathway was associated with L-mimosine. L-mimosine reduced the levels of ERK and p-ERK in a concentration-dependent manner, and the ERK signaling specific inhibitor SCH772984 was used for verification. The results suggested ERK signaling to be an additional mechanism for apoptosis induction.

In conclusion, the present study confirmed that L-mimosine was able to effectively inhibit the proliferation of osteosarcoma cells, and concluded that L-mimosine induces caspase-9-mediated apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. In the future, further studies are required to detect the inhibitory effects of L-mimosine in more types of tumor, or to compare the toxic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs with clear antitumor mechanisms and L-mimosine. The present study may provide the basis for a more comprehensive understanding and evaluation of this type of plant amino acid. Further research is required to assess the potential of L-mimosine as an antitumor drug. Different types of antitumor drugs act via different mechanisms, and the same type of drug may have different modes of action according to cell cycle specificity. Combinations of currently-used drugs and L-mimosine may provide a broader options for the treatment of cancer.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81571811).

References

1 

Picci P: Osteosarcoma (osteogenic sarcoma). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2:62007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ferrari S and Palmerini E: Adjuvant and neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 19:341–346. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Marina N, Gebhardt M, Teot L and Gorlick R: Biology and therapeutic advances for pediatric osteosarcoma. Oncologist. 9:422–441. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Chung LC, Tsui KH, Feng TH, Lee SL, Chang PL and Juang HH: L-Mimosine blocks cell proliferation via upregulation of B-cell translocation gene 2 and N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 in prostate carcinoma cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 302:C676–C685. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zalatnai A and Bocsi J: Mimosine, a plant-derived amino acid induces apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer xenografts. Anticancer Res. 23:4007–4009. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Kulp KS and Vulliet PR: Mimosine blocks cell cycle progression by chelating iron in asynchronous human breast cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 139:356–364. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Hughes TA and Cook PR: Mimosine arrests the cell cycle after cells enter S-phase. Exp Cell Res. 222:275–280. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hwang HS, Davis TW, Houghton JA and Kinsella TJ: Radiosensitivity of thymidylate synthase-deficient human tumor cells is affected by progression through the G1 restriction point into S-phase: Implications for fluoropyrimidine radiosensitization. Cancer Res. 60:92–100. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Lalande M: A reversible arrest point in the late G1 phase of the mammalian cell cycle. Exp Cell Res. 186:332–339. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Mosca PJ, Dijkwel PA and Hamlin JL: The plant amino acid mimosine may inhibit initiation at origins of replication in Chinese hamster cells. Mol Cell Biol. 12:4375–4383. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Gilbert DM, Neilson A, Miyazawa H, DePamphilis ML and Burhans WC: Mimosine arrests DNA synthesis at replication forks by inhibiting deoxyribonucleotide metabolism. J Biol Chem. 270:9597–9606. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Kalejta RF and Hamlin JL: The dual effect of mimosine on DNA replication. Exp Cell Res. 231:173–183. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Krude T: Mimosine arrests proliferating human cells before onset of DNA replication in a dose-dependent manner. Exp Cell Res. 247:148–159. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Chang HC, Lee TH, Chuang LY, Yen MH and Hung WC: Inhibitory effect of mimosine on proliferation of human lung cancer cells is mediated by multiple mechanisms. Cancer Lett. 145:1–8. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Oppenheim EW, Nasrallah IM, Mastri MG and Stover PJ: Mimosine is a cell-specific antagonist of folate metabolism. J Biol Chem. 275:19268–19274. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chang HC, Weng CF, Yen MH, Chuang LY and Hung WC: Modulation of cell cycle regulatory protein expression and suppression of tumor growth by mimosine in nude mice. Int J Oncol. 17:659–665. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Dong Z and Zhang JT: EIF3 p170, a mediator of mimosine effect on protein synthesis and cell cycle progression. Mol Biol Cell. 14:3942–3951. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Shen J, Yin JY, Li XP, Liu ZQ, Wang Y, Chen J, Qu J, Xu XJ, McLeod HL, He YJ, et al: The prognostic value of altered eIF3a and its association with p27 in non-small cell lung cancers. PLoS One. 9:e960082014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Staunton MJ and Gaffney EF: Tumor type is a determinant of susceptibility to apoptosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 103:300–307. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Fisher DE: Apoptosis in cancer therapy: Crossing the threshold. Cell. 78:539–542. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Fan S, Smith ML, Rivet DJ II, Duba D, Zhan Q, Kohn KW, Fornace AJ Jr and O'Connor PM: Disruption of p53 function sensitizes breast cancer MCF-7 cells to cisplatin and pentoxifylline. Cancer Res. 55:1649–1654. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Le NT and Richardson DR: Iron chelators with high antiproliferative activity up-regulate the expression of a growth inhibitory and metastasis suppressor gene: A link between iron metabolism and proliferation. Blood. 104:2967–2975. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zalatnai A: P-glycoprotein expression is induced in human pancreatic cancer xenografts during treatment with a cell cycle regulator, mimosine. Pathol Oncol Res. 11:164–169. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Elmore S: Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 35:495–516. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Lavrik IN, Golks A and Krammer PH: Caspases: Pharmacological manipulation of cell death. J Clin Invest. 115:2665–2672. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Grütter MG: Caspases: Key players in programmed cell death. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 10:649–655. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Hata AN, Engelman JA and Faber AC: The BCL2 family: Key mediators of the apoptotic response to targeted anticancer therapeutics. Cancer Discov. 5:475–487. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wei MC, Zong WX, Cheng EH, Lindsten T, Panoutsakopoulou V, Ross AJ, Roth KA, MacGregor GR, Thompson CB and Korsmeyer SJ: Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: A requisite gateway to mitochondrial dysfunction and death. Science. 292:727–730. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Parsons MJ and Green DR: Mitochondria in cell death. Essays Biochem. 47:99–114. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Kantari C and Walczak H: Caspase-8 and bid: Caught in the act between death receptors and mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1813:558–563. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kim B, Srivastava SK and Kim SH: Caspase-9 as a therapeutic target for treating cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 19:113–127. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Gu X and Manautou JE: Molecular mechanisms underlying chemical liver injury. Expert Rev Mol Med. 14:e42012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2018
Volume 17 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Xu Y and Xu Y: L‑mimosine induces caspase‑9‑mediated apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells. Mol Med Rep 17: 4695-4701, 2018
APA
Xu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018). L‑mimosine induces caspase‑9‑mediated apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells. Molecular Medicine Reports, 17, 4695-4701. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8403
MLA
Xu, Y., Cai, L."L‑mimosine induces caspase‑9‑mediated apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells". Molecular Medicine Reports 17.3 (2018): 4695-4701.
Chicago
Xu, Y., Cai, L."L‑mimosine induces caspase‑9‑mediated apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells". Molecular Medicine Reports 17, no. 3 (2018): 4695-4701. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8403