Open Access

Change in tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels, a marker of bone metabolism, in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir alafenamide

  • Authors:
    • Takuma Okamura
    • Tatsuki Ichikawa
    • Hisamitsu Miyaaki
    • Satoshi Miuma
    • Yasuhide Motoyoshi
    • Mio Yamashima
    • Shinobu Yamamichi
    • Makiko Koike
    • Yusuke Nakano
    • Tetsurou Honda
    • Hiroyuki Yajima
    • Osamu Miyazaki
    • Yasutaka Kuribayashi
    • Tomonari Ikeda
    • Naota Taura
    • Kazuhiko Nakao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 24, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1489
  • Article Number: 6
  • Copyright: © Okamura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is associated with the risk of osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is associated with a slightly lower degree of BMD loss compared with tenofovir disoproxil, without loss of the excellent anti‑HBV effects. The aim of the present study was to verify the effect of bone metabolism in patients with HBV treated with TAF. A total of 87 patients were treated with TAF. Of these, 32 patients were treatment naïve, and 55 patients were treated with entecavir (ETV) for at least 1 year, after which ETV was switched to TAF. At the start of TAF and after 1 year, BMD in the lumbar and neck of the femur, tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP‑5b) levels as a marker of bone metabolism and serum inorganic phosphorus (P) were compared to estimate bone metabolism. Serum creatinine (Cr), cystatin C, urine protein and β2 microglobulin levels were evaluated to estimate kidney function. Treatment with TAF for 1 year decreased TRACP‑5b levels, particularly in patients with bone disease, except for a minimal significant change (MSC; decrease of 12.4%) in TRACP‑5b levels. The change in rate of TRACP‑5b levels were positively associated with changes in P, Cr‑estimated glomerular filtration rate and TRACP‑5b levels at the start of TAF. Logistic regression analysis showed that increased BMD in the lumbar region contributed to the switch from ETV to TAF. TAF induced a decrease in TRACP‑5b levels in patients with HBV. Bone disease was a contributing factor for MSC. Since TRACP‑5b can be used as a marker of bone metabolism and fractures, TAF may exhibit potential in preventing fractures in patients with HBV.

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection causes cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (1,2); de novo HBV infection also causes acute liver failure (2). Treatment for HBV infection focuses on improving survival and quality of life by preventing disease progression (3). Long-term administration of a potent nucleoside/nucleotide analog (NA) with a high barrier to resistance is the treatment of choice regardless of the severity of liver disease, and the preferred regimens are entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) (3). In cases of long-term administration of NA, patients are at an increased risk of renal disease and should undergo periodic renal monitoring, including at least estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum phosphate level (3). Chronic HBV infection is associated with kidney damage (4), and follow-up of renal function in patients with HBV is important during treatment.

Additionally, hepatic osteodystrophy (HOD) is common in chronic liver diseases, including viral hepatitis (5-7). HOD includes osteoporosis and osteomalacia, which are caused by hormonal abnormality-induced advanced liver failure complicated with abnormal serum calcium and phosphate (5-7). HBV infection is associated with the risk of osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) loss (8,9). The bone metabolic marker, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP-5b), is an activation marker of osteoclasts, and is elevated in patients with HOD associated with chronic liver disease (6). TRACP-5b levels from baseline to 3 months after treatment may predict the efficacy of bone therapy after 12 months (10). Therefore, measurements of BMD and bone metabolic markers are useful in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis (11).

TAF is associated with a slightly lower degree of BMD loss and creatinine (Cr) elevation compared with TDF, without loss of the excellent anti-viral effects (12-14). Patients on TDF that are at a risk of development of or have already developed underlying renal or bone disease should be considered for a switch to ETV or TAF (3). However, switching from ETV to TAF is contested. When ETV was switched to TAF, serum Cr (15) or renal tubular function (16) improved, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decreased, however no-change in BMD and renal function were observed (17). ETV is administered orally once daily under fasting conditions, and TAF is administered orally once daily. Switching from ETV to TAF can be a useful approach for improving medication adherence and satisfaction (18,19).

Based on favorable adherence, TAF is being chosen for the treatment naïve patients with HBV in our hospital, and patients have been encouraged to switch from ETV to TAF since 2017. In this study, the influence of TAF treatment on bone metabolism and kidney function for 1 year of TAF treatment was evaluated.

Patients and methods

Patients

A total of 87 patients with HBV infection were admitted to the Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center between April 2017 and February 2020. Of these, 32 patients (median age, 58.96; range, 36-86; female/male, 14/18) were naïve to treatment with TAF (Vemlidy, Gilead Sciences) (Naïve group), and 55 patients (median age, 59.89; range, 35-82; female/male, 15/40) were treated with ETV (Baraclude, Bristol-Myers Sqibb) for at least 1 year, and switched to TAF (Switch group). The reason for switching was to ensure drug compliance, adjusted for lifestyle. ETV was administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg once daily under fasting conditions. TAF was administered orally at a dose of 25 mg once daily. No patients were treated for osteoporosis before TAF initiation. The medical records of the 87 patients were compared at the start of TAF and after 1 year. The prevention group was treated with TAF for asymptomatic HBV using immunosuppressants and/or anticancer drugs. The bone disease-positive group was defined as follows: Chronic steroid use or use of other medications that worsen bone density and/or history of fragility fracture and/or osteoporosis.

The medical records of the 87 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Informed consent was obtained from each patient included in the study, and the patients were guaranteed the right to leave the study if they desired. The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki (20) and was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center (approval no. H30-031).

Laboratory measurements

Laboratory data and anthropometric measurements were obtained for each subject every 4-12 weeks during treatment, and BMD and urinalysis were examined every 12 months. The body mass index of each patient was calculated by dividing their weight in kg by the square of their height in meters. Laboratory examinations included platelet count, Cr, cystatin C (CysC), albumin, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphorus (P), α-fetoprotein, protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II), Mac-2 binding protein glycan isomer (M2BPGi), total type I procollagen N-propeptide (P1NP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b). HBsAg, HBeAg, HBe antibody (HBeAb), HB core-related Ag (HBcrAg) and HBV-DNA were evaluated at the start of TAF administration and 1 year later. Urinalysis was performed using the β2-microglobulin-to-creatinine β2MG/Cr ratio and total protein-to-creatinine protein/Cr ratio. Radiological findings in the present study.

Osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal BMD were diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria (osteoporosis, T-score ≤-2.5; osteopenia, T-score between -2.5 and -1; normal BMD: T-score >-1) (21). Bone mineral density was measured at the lumbar spine (mean, L2-L4) and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Cr- and CysC-based estimated GFRs (eGFRs) (ml/min/1.73 m2) in women and men were calculated using the equations provided by the Japanese Society of Nephrology for Japanese patients (22). The sarcopenia index (SI) was calculated as follows: Cr/CysC x100(23). The calculated body muscle mass (CBMM) was calculated as follows: (body weight in kg x Cr)/[K x body weight in kg x CysC)+ Cr], where K=0.00675 for men and 0.01006 for women (24).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using StatFlex version 6.0 (Artech Co., Ltd.) and are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Laboratory result variables were compared using a Wilcoxon test for differences between paired groups, a Mann-Whitney tests comparison for unpaired two groups, and a χ2 test for comparison between discrete variables. A standardized partial regression coefficient β was employed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression analysis. Correlations were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (R). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The clinical characteristics of the patients at the start of TAF and after 1 year, are described in Table I. It was observed that male patients were dominant and 51 patients were ≥60 years of age. The prevention group included patients with asymptomatic HBV infection treated with TAF as part of an anticancer or immunosuppressive therapy. During the 1-year observation period, HBsAg levels were not significantly altered, but HBcrAg and HBV-DNA levels significantly decreased. Albumin levels increased and M2BPGi levels decreased. Regarding renal function, Cr levels were increased, Cr-based eGFR decreased and urine protein/Cr ratio increased. CysC, CysC eGFR, Ca, P and urine β2MG/Cr ratios were not significantly changed. In bone metabolism, lumbar BMD did not change, but the BMD of the neck of femur decreased. However, TRACP-5b levels significantly improved. P1NP was not measured after 1 year.

Table I

Clinical characteristics at start of treatment and after 1 year.

Table I

Clinical characteristics at start of treatment and after 1 year.

FactorAt startAfter 1 yearP-value
Female/male, n29/5829/58 
Age, years59.55(12) -
Age bracket, n  -
     ≥60 years51  
     <60 years37  
Body weight, kg61.83 (12.1)61.91 (12.18)0.5899
Body mass index, kg/m223.07 (3.64)  
Groups, n   
     Naïve32  
     Switch55  
     Prevention20  
HBsAg IU/ml3,134 (9,744)2,115 (3,697)0.0005
HBcrAg Log U/ml3.457 (1.612)3.11 (1.485) <0.0001c
HBcrAg positive, n4536 <0.001c
HBeAg C.O.I.97.756(376)55.628(271)0.0352a
HBeAg positive, n13130.999
HBeAb % inhibition74.41 (34.12)72.84 (32.5)0.2149
HBV-DNA log IU/ml1.80 (2.522)0.251 (0.559) <0.0001d
HBV-DNA positive, n4117 <0.0001d
AST U/l68.92 (227.13)26.73 (14.85)0.019a
ALT U/l79.91 (310.1)24.97 (21.05)0.0241a
Platelet x104/µl17.86 (7.164)18.64 (17.49)0.342
Albumin g/dl4.098 (0.578)4.226 (0.456)0.0053b
Total bilirubin mg/dl0.921 (0.985)0.907 (0.577)0.0198a
M2BPGi C.O.I1.436 (2.05)1.058 (1.37)0.0014b
Cr mg/d0.825 (0.248)0.857 (0.219)0.0007c
Cr-eGFR ml/min/1.73 m272.945 (19.006)68.51 (16.91)<0.0001
Cys C mg/l1.103 (0.345)1.098 (0.328)0.6944
Cys C-eGFR ml/min/1.73 m270.74 (22.66)70.36 (22.49)0.6253
Sarcopenia indexe77.21 (18.4)80.69 (817.82)0.0424a
Ca mg/dl9.074 (0.493)9.138 (0.486)0.2563
P mg/dl3.127 (0.502)3.193 (0.522)0.4027
Urine protein/Cr g/g0.147 (0.383)0.199 (0.536)0.0205a
Urine b2MG/Cr µg/mg4.499 (19.301)7.845 (32.666)0.9357
Lumbar BMD g/cm20.906 (0.206)0.907 (0.2)0.2041
Lumbar t-score-1.09 (1.697)-1.091 (1.668)0.4505
Lumbar young adult mean87.62 (19.614)87.427 (18.833)0.7057
Lumbar osteoporosis, n19150.3409
Neck of femur BMD g/cm20.66 (0.142)0.636 (0.132) <0.0001d
Neck of femur t-score-1.504 (1.111)-1.699 (1.026)0.0001d
Neck of femur young adult mean78.785 (15.523)75.813 (14.659) <0.0001d
Neck of femur Osteoporosis, n13210.0625
TRACP-5b mU/dl417.7(207)356.5 (142.3)0.0039b
TRACP-5b High, n18130.1714
P1NP ng/ml55.05 (28.25)  
P1NP Highe90 
α-fetoprotein ng/ml10.64(25)4.93 (4.5)0.6469
PIVKA-II mAU/ml38.33 (114.3)38.46 (106.5)0.4463

[i] aP≤0.05,

[ii] bP≤0.01,

[iii] cP≤0.001,

[iv] dP≤0.0001.

[v] eData are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Co.O.I., cut off index. The sensitivity of HBsAg is 0.005 IU/ml. The sensitivity of HBcrAg is 2.9 log U/ml. The sensitivity of HBeAg is 1.0 cut off index. Positive HBeAb was <60% inhibition. The HBV-DNA detection level ranged from 1-9.1 log IU/ml. The normal range of AST is 10-40 U/l. The normal range of ALT is 5-45 U/l. The normal range of platelet counts is 14.0-37.9x104/µl. The normal range of albumin is 3.7-5.5 g/dl. The normal range of total bilirubin is 0.3-1.2 mg/dl. Unit of M2BPGi is C.O.I. The normal range of Cr is 0.65-1.09 (male) and 0.46-0.82 (female) mg/dl. The Cr-based eGFR is ml/min/1.73 m2. Normal range of CysC is 0.58-0.87 (male) and 0.47-0.82 (female) mg/l. CysC-eGFR is ml/min/1.73 m2. The sarcopenia index was calculated as follows: serum Cr/CysC x100. The normal range of calcium (Ca) is 8.5-10.2. mg/dl. The normal range of P is 2.4-4.3 mg/dl. The urine protein/Cr ratio was g/g. Urine β2MG/Cr was µg/mg. Lumbar bone mineral density is the mean of the lumbar spine 2-4 and is measured in g/cm2. The young adult mean (lumber spine, 20-44 years of age) is 1.19 g/cm2 in men and 1.12 g/cm2 in women. The YAM (femur neck) was 0.95 g/cm2 in men and 0.90 g/cm2 in female. A T-score ≤-2.5 indicates osteoporosis. The normal range of TRACP-5b is 170-590 in males and 120-420 in females (mU/dl). The TRACP-5b High group was over the upper limits. Normal range of total P1NP is 18.1-74.1 in male, 16.8-70.1 in premenopausal female and 26.4-98.2 in postmenopausal (ng/ml). The P1NP High group was over the upper limits. The normal range of α-fetoprotein was under 10 ng/ml. The normal range of protein induced by PIVKA-II is <40 mAU/ml.

A focus was placed on the change in TRACP-5b associated with TAF. The change in TRACP-5b levels were compared with clinical factors (Table II). TRACP-5b at start in male patients, patients who were HBeAg-positive, HBcrAg-positive, HBV-DNA-negative, switch, treatment, high albumin (≥4 g/dl), high platelet count (≥15x104/µl) and low body mass index (<25) were lower than after 1 year. In conforming with the EASL guidelines (4), old age (≥60 years), bone disease [chronic steroid use or use of other medications that worsen bone density and/or history of fragility fracture and/or osteoporosis) and renal alteration (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or moderate dipstick proteinuria and/or low P (<2.5 mg/dl) and/or hemodialysis] were selected for the disease group. Old age (≥60 years) and bone disease significantly decreased TRAC-5b levels. Next, whether these factors contributed to the decrease in TRCAP-5b levels with TAF use was assessed. Since bone metabolic markers have various circadian variations, MSCs were set for each marker. The MSC of TRACP-5b showed over a 12.4% of change rate [(pre-treatment-after treatment)/pretreatment x100]. Therefore, the contribution of TRACP-5b to MSCs (32 cases) was evaluated. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that bone disease was the only contributing factor for MSCs. The bone disease group had lower BMD in the lumbar and neck of the femur at start and after 1 year compared with the control group. A high tendency of TRACP-5b levels at the start was observed, however there was no difference in TRACP-5b levels after 1 year (Fig. 1A-C).

Table II

Change in TRACP-5b levels and contributing factors in the MSC of TRACP-5b.

Table II

Change in TRACP-5b levels and contributing factors in the MSC of TRACP-5b.

 Logistical analysis for MSC of TRACP-5bComparison of TRACP-5b between at start and after 1 year
Group (n)At startdAfter 1 yeardP-valueOdds ratio95% Confidence intervalP-value
Female (29)431 (216.6)381.68 (143.3)0.374   
Male (58)410.1 (203.2)343.9 (141.2)0.0016b1.0820.422-2.7730.8699
Age <60 years old (36)366.73 (179.3)313.46 (113.2)0.0596   
Age ≥60 years old (51)453.49 (219.3)387.2 (153.68)0.0311a1.0830.435-2.6960.8646
HBeAg positive (13)308.77 (119.1)299.23 (141.1)0.005b0.9030.266-3.0590.8695
HBeAg negative (74)438.84 (214.3)366.99(141)0.3463   
HBcrAg positive (45)412.3 (215.7)327.5 (129.3)0.0012b1.0620.361-2.4560.9014
HBcrAg negative (42)431.3 (210.2)370.3 (128.7)0.18   
HBV-DNA positive (41)406.97 (208.53)369.1 (147.86)0.9547   
HBV-DNA negative (46)427.4 (207.77)346.1 (138.3)0.0015b1.2320.5-3.0390.6504
Bone disease negative (33)356.57(115)364.5 (145.9)0.9093   
Bone disease positive (54)450.6 (237.2)351.58 (141.2)0.0007c2.8851.044-7.9720.0411a
Renal alteration negative (53)399.8 (161.63)346.4 (137.69)0.0043b   
Renal alteration positive (34)446 (264.1)372(150)0.29890.5630.219-1.4450.2322
Naïve TAF (32)394.66(198)375.83 (142.8)0.8382   
Switch ETV to TAF (55)430.8 (212.8)346.3 (142.3)0.0004c2.2220.828-5.9640.1129
Treatment (67)403 (177.2)339.88 (1249)0.002b   
Prevention (20)472.24 (293.28)413.37 (185.2)0.43470.7550.248-2.3040.6218
Albumin ≥4 g/dl (65)407.42 (211.7)347.75 (139.6)0.0079b   
Albumin <4 g/dl (22)453.1 (191.56)386.4 (8,151.19)0.27751.0360.348-3.0850.9493
Platelet ≥15x104/µl over (62)405.7(193)352.14(146)0.0123a   
Platelet <15x104/µl (25)451.38 (244.2)366.8 (135.59)0.12180.660.232-1.8780.4360
BMI ≥25(25)380(185)359.5 (132.8)0.8314   
BMI <25(62)432.9(215)355.24 (147.2)0.001b1.8430.656-5.1780.2458
CBMM High (57)387 (189.9)344.4 (134.14)0.0387   
CBMM Low (30)477.9 (229.1)382.1 (157.78)0.05731.1170.431-2.8990.8193

[i] aP≤0.05,

[ii] bP≤0.01,

[iii] cP≤0.001.

[iv] dData are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. TRACP-5b was compared between the two groups at the start and after 1 year. The MSC of TRACP-5b was 12.4%. The group that contributed to MSCs (32 cases) was analyzed by logistical analysis. The bone disease-positive group was defined as follows: Chronic steroid use or use of other medications that worsen bone density and/or history of fragility fracture and/or osteoporosis. Renal alteration was defined as follows: eGFR < ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or moderate dipstick proteinuria and/or low P (<2.5 mg/dl) and/or hemodialysis. The treatment group was treated with TAF for chronic HBV infection. The prevention group was treated with TAF for asymptomatic HBV using immunosuppressants and/or anticancer drugs. The CBMM High group was defined as follows: >27.903 in women and >39.731 in men.

Next, the relationship between TRACP-5b rate change and clinical factors at the start of TAF were evaluated (Table III). Cr-eGFR, P, P1NP and TRACP-5b were positively correlated with the TRACP-5b rate of change. Amongst these factors, Cr-eGFR and TRACP-5b were related to the TRCAP-5b rate of change in the multi-regression model. The change in these factors (at the start of TAF and after 1 year) was also evaluated in relation to the TRACP-5b rate of change (Table III). The change in P was only related to the TRACP-5b rate of change.

Table III

Rate of change in TRACP-5b levels and clinical factors.

Table III

Rate of change in TRACP-5b levels and clinical factors.

 Factors at start and TRACP-5b rate of changeChange in factor and TRACP-5b change rate
FactorRP-valueβP-valueRP-valueβP-value
Age-0.0070.9547      
Body weight-0.050.6609  -0.1480.1961  
Body mass index-0.1320.2481      
HBsAg-0.0040.9711  0.0140.9022  
HBcrAg0.090.4589  0.1380.2679  
HBeAg-0.1290.2581  0.0940.4359  
HBV-DNA-0.0810.4813  -0.0380.7431  
AST0.0640.5755  0.0670.5561  
ALT0.0670.5567  0.0790.4925  
Platelet0.060.5982  -0.0440.7019  
Albumin0.020.8607  -0.0010.9905  
Total bilirubin0.1520.1803  0.1580.1645  
M2BPGi0.1860.1384  0.140.2837  
Cr-0.1780.1168  -0.0220.848  
Cr-eGFR0.2210.0498a0.2670.003b0.0250.8288  
Cys C-0.1450.2042  0.0060.9618  
Cys C-eGFR0.1220.2868  0.0040.9743  
Sarcopenia index-0.0350.7608  -0.0370.7626  
Ca0.0690.552  0.1910.1026  
P0.2540.0244a0.0970.36560.3120.0055b0.3120.0057b
Urine protein/Cr-0.1250.3111  0.0570.6601  
Urine b2MG/Cr0.1670.1906  -0.0810.5436  
Lumbar BMD-0.2050.0772  -0.1840.1304  
Lumbar t-score-0.2130.066      
Lumbar young adult mean-0.2080.0737      
Neck of Femur BMD-0.1270.279  0.0360.7697  
Neck of Femur t-score-0.150.2003      
Neck of Femur young adult mean-0.1450.2163      
TRACP-5b0.532 <0.0001c0.5330.0003c    
P1NP0.3930.0008-0.0050.9702    
α-fetoprotein0.0970.4062  0.0430.7195  
PIVKA-II-0.0810.4898  0.0730.5418  

[i] aP≤0.05,

[ii] bP≤0.01,

[iii] cP≤0.001. The relationship between factors and changes in TRACP-5b was evaluated using correlation and multiple regression models. R is the correlation coefficient. β is the standardized partial regression coefficient. Only factors with a significant R value were analyzed by multi-regression analysis.

Changes in lumbar BMD were evaluated based on clinical factors (Table IV). The clinical factors were the same as in Table II. The Switch group exhibited increased BMD only in the lumbar region, but the control group (naïve group) did not exhibit any significant changes. Increases in BMD were significant between the start and after 1 year, [(44 cases exhibited increased BMD after 1 year compared with at the start]. Logistic univariate analysis showed that the switch was a contributing factor for the increased BMD in the lumbar spine. The Switch group did not exhibit a difference in BMD of the lumbar and neck of the femur and TRACP-5b at the start and after 1 year compared to the control (Fig. 1D-F). BMD in the lumbar region after 1 year in the switch group increased more than at the start (Fig. 1D), and TRACP-5b after 1 year after switching also decreased more than at the start (Fig. 1F).

Table IV

Change of BMD in the lumbar region and factors contributing to the increased BMD in the lumbar region.

Table IV

Change of BMD in the lumbar region and factors contributing to the increased BMD in the lumbar region.

 Comparison with BMD in LumbarFactors contributing to the increase in BMD in the lumbar region
Group (n)At startAfter 1 yearP-valueOdds ratio95% confidence intervalP-value
Female (29)0.839 (0.184)0.861 (0.171)0.757   
Male (58)0.94 (0.184)0.93 (0.211)0.0691   
Age <60 years old (36)0.906 (0.155)0.908 (0.146)0.896   
Age ≥60 years old (51)0.906 (0.239)0.906 (0.234)0.1428   
HBeAg positive (13)0.858 (0.157)0.888 (0.143)0.2791   
HBeAg negative (74)0.913 (0.213)0.91 (0.208)0.4752   
HBcrAg positive (45)0.925 (0.181)0.936 (0.177)0.7915   
HBcrAg negative (42)0.875 (0.243)0.866 (0.229)0.0926   
HBV-DNA positive (41)0.923 (0.202)0.942 (0.169)0.7531   
HBV-DNA negative (46)0.89 (0.211)0.881 (0.219)0.147   
Bone disease negative (33)1.046 (0.155)1.013 (0.173)0.3043   
Bone disease positive (54)0.841 (0.195)0.857 (0.193)0.3982   
Renal alteration negative (53)0.888 (0.205)0.876 (0.208)0.8126   
Renal alteration positive (34)0.935 (0.208)0.959 (0.178)0.0875   
Naïve TAF (32)0.934 (0.21)0.933 (0.193)0.2086   
Switch ETV to TAF (55)0.888 (0.204)0.894 (0.204)0.0061a3.9231.409-10.9250.0089a
Treatment (67)0.898 (0.2)0.891 (0.194)0.1459   
Prevention (20)0.936 (0.235)0.972 (0.251)0.9999   
Albumin ≥4 g/dl (65)0.898 (0.208)0.889 (0.199)0.3172   
Albumin <4 g/dl (22)0.936 (0.202)0.913 (0.21)0.3061   
Platelet count ≥15x104/µl (62)0.902 (0.216)0.913 (0.21)0.089   
Platelet count <15x104/µl (25)0.916 (0.181)0.89 (0.173)0.6231   
Body mass index ≥25(25)1.051 (0.214)1.049 (0.203)0.8562   
Body mass index <25(62)0.846 (0.172)0.852 (0.171)0.1029   
CBMM High (57)0.955 (0.213)0.953 (0.211)0.1972   
CBMM Low (30)0.81 (0.155)0.816 (0.139)0.511   

[i] aP<0.01. BMD in the lumbar spine was compared at the start and after 1 year. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Increased BMD was defined as: BMD at the start < BMD after 1 year. An increase in BMD was observed in 44 patients. The contributing factors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Similarly, the change in BMD in the neck of the femur was also evaluated based on several clinical factors (Table V). Male sex, prevention group, low albumin levels and a low BMI did not decrease BMD in the neck of the femur after 1 year. Changes in BMD in the femoral neck were evaluated. There were 18 cases of increased BMD (at start-after 1 year). Logistic univariate analysis revealed that female sex was the only factor for increased BMD in the neck of the femur. The number of patients with increased BMD (18 cases) in the femoral neck was less than that in the lumbar region (44 cases, P=0.0001) and MSCs in TRACP-5b (32 cases, P=0.0289). BMD in the femoral neck was lower in females than in males at the start and after 1 year; however there was no difference between the start and after 1 year in females (Fig. 1H). BMD in the lumbar spine and TRACP-5b also showed no difference between the start and after 1 year in females (Fig. 1G and I).

Table V

Change of BMD in the neck of femur and factors contributing to the increased BMD in the neck of femur.

Table V

Change of BMD in the neck of femur and factors contributing to the increased BMD in the neck of femur.

 Comparison with BMD in the neck of femurFactors contributing to the in BMD in the neck of femur
Group (n)At starteAfter 1 yeareP-valueOdds ratio95% confidence intervalP-value
Female (29)0.572 (0.101)0.574 (0.098)0.1193   
Male (58)0.705 (0.14)0.667 (0.137) <0.0001d0.3080.102-0.9280.0364a
Age <60 years old (36)0.702 (0.128)0.671 (0.11)0.0011b   
Age ≥60 years old (51)0.629 (0.146)0.61 (0.142)0.0008c   
HBeAg positive (13)0.603 (0.079)0.594 (0.078) <0.0001d   
HBeAg negative (74)0.669 (0.148)0.642 (0.138)0.0467a   
HBcrAg positive (45)0.693 (0.136)0.672 (0.117)0.0003c   
HBcrAg negative (42)0.622 (0.156)0.595 (0.152)0.0104a   
HBV-DNA positive (41)0.644 (0.121)0.637 (0.113)0.0402a   
HBV-DNA negative (46)0.674 (0.159)0.635 (0.147) <0.0001d   
Bone disease negative (33)0.78 (0.108)0.726 (0.102)0.0015b   
Bone disease positive (54)0.604 (0.12)0.594 (0.124)0.0005c   
Renal alteration negative (53)0.663 (0.14390.634 (0.134)0.0001d   
Renal alteration positive (34)0.655 (0.142)0.638 (0.131)0.0092c   
Naïve TAF (32)0.647 (0.124)0.623 (0.122)0.0007c   
Switch ETV to TAF (55)0.668 (0.153)0.643 (0.138)0.0012c   
Treatment (67)0.665 (0.134)0.643 (0.118) <0.0001d   
Prevention (20)0.641 (0.175)0.608 (0.181)0.06210.7820.192-3.1880.7314
Albumin ≥4 g/dl (65)0.651 (0.149)0.635 (0.141) <0.0001d   
Albumin <4 g/dl (22)0.685 (0.118)0.639 (0.106)0.22382.5820.703-9.4930.1531
Platelet count ≥15x104/µl (62)0.729 (0.141)0.714 (0.119 <0.0001d   
Platelet <15x104/µl (25)0.632 (0.134)0.606 (0.125)0.0457a   
Body mass index ≥25(25)0.729 (0.141)0.714 (0.119)0.1043   
Body mass index <25(62)0.632 (0.134)0.606 (0.125) <0.0001d0.3570.115-1.1050.074
CBMM High (57)0.7 (0.129)0.678 (0.125) <0.0001d   
CBMM Low (30)0.583 (0.136)0.551 (0.105)0.0114a   

[i] aP≤0.05,

[ii] bP≤0.01,

[iii] cP≤0.001,

[iv] dP≤0.0001. BMD in the neck of femur was compared at the start and after 1 year.

[v] eData are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Increased BMD was defined as: BMD at the start < BMD after 1 year. An increase in BMD was observed in 18 patients. The contributing factors for increased BMD after 1 year were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Discussion

Treatment with TAF for 1 year decreased TRACP-5b levels, especially in patients with bone disease, excluding the MSC of TRACP-5b. The rate of change of TRACP-5b was associated with changes in P, Cr-eGFR and TRACP-5b levels at the start of TAF. Increased BMD in the lumbar region contributed to the switch from ETV to TAF. Increased BMD in the neck of the femur was present in female patients.

TRACP-5b at the start of TAF was related to the rate of change of TRACP-5b. HBV-infected patients exhibited hyperosteoclast function before TAF treatment. Carbon tetrachloride induced liver damage may have increased the levels of TRACP-5b (25), and HOD has been reported to increase TRACP-5b levels in patients with chronic liver disease (6). HOD is based on cirrhosis and is caused by insufficient liver-related factors, vitamin K, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)23 (5-7). However, in the present study, low albumin and low platelet counts were not contributing factors for the MSC of TRACP-5b. Previous population-based studies have described the relationship between HBV infection and osteoporosis (8,9). It is speculated that HOD appears in pre-cirrhosis related to HBV.

TRACP-5b levels are reflected in osteoclast function, number and volume (6,26), and is a bone turnover marker and predictor of fracture-independent BMD (27,28). High serum P was related to changes in TRACP-5b levels, and a decrease in P for 1 year was positively related to a decrease in TRACP-5b levels. More osteoblasts were normalized by TAF, and bone reabsorption was recovered. As a result, P was resorbed to the bone, and serum P decreased (6). The results showed that TAF was effective for the amelioration of osteoclasts. Since changes in TRACP-5b are related to fracture (11,27,28), BMD in the lumbar and neck of the femur was not improved by TAF; thus whether TAF could prevent fractures will be the focus of future studies.

BMD in the neck of the femur decreased during the observation period. A previous study described mean hip BMD at 1 year after TAF treatment was lower than that at the start of treatment, but less than 1 year after TDF treatment (12-14). There was no control after 1 year; however, BMD in the lumbar spine and TRACP-5b did not worsen after 1 year. There were 18 cases of increased BMD in the femur, less than the number of cases of increased BMD in the lumbar (44 cases) and MSC (32 cases) groups. Females exhibited increased BMD in the femoral neck, and TRACP-5b did not decrease after 1 year. Differences between the femur and lumbar vertebrae in patients with CHB treated with TAF will continue to be observed in the future.

Increased Cr and decreased Cr-eGFR were observed after 1 year of TAF treatment. However, CysC and CysC eGFR were not altered significantly during the treatment period. The SI indicates muscle volume and prognosis in patients in the intensive care unit (23). SI elevation reflects an increase in Cr, whilst CysC remains unchanged, and this is indicative of muscle volume gain. Changes in muscle mass should also be evaluated in future studies. Urine protein/creatinine ratio was elevated after 1 year, but the β2MG/creatinine ratio did not differ during the observational period. Previous reports did not identify the adverse effects of TAF on the kidney (14-17). In contrast to previous reports, the prevention group in the present study (20 cases) were treated with anticancer agents and/or immunosuppressants at the start of TAF administration, and this was continued after 1 year. It is hypothesized that there is a relationship between concomitant drug use with TAF and proteinuria.

Switching ETV to TAF was a contributing factor in the increased BMD in the lumbar spine. The Switch group showed decreased TRACP-5b levels. TAF treatment resulted in less BMD loss than TDF treatment (12-14), but BMD gain was not observed. In the switch from ETV to TAF, BMD was not changed after 48 weeks in a previous report (17), and there was no significant increase in the incidence of osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients with CHB treated with TDF or ETV compared to those without treatment (29). It may seem that reduced BMD may be partly due to underlying chronic liver disease, and several patients with CHB may already have pre-existing low BMD prior to commencing antiviral therapy (8,9,30). Long-term observations are required to explore the anti-HBV effects of NAs and BMD.

The present study has some limitations. This was a single-center, small retrospective study, including prevention and a 1 year observational analysis. Thus, it was not possible to evaluate HOD-related bone related hormones, such as FGF23, PTH, vitamin D and vitamin K. The protective effects of TAF on renal function has been now widely established (3,12). However, it may be possible to ascertain additional useful information regarding the relationship between HBV infection and bone metabolism.

In conclusion, patients with HBV infection complicated by bone disease exhibited decreased TRACP-5b levels after treatment with TAF. Switching ETV to TAF increased BMD in the lumbar spine and decreased the TRAC-5b levels. TAF is acceptable for improving/maintaining bone metabolism in patients with HBV infection, and TRACP-5b was shown to be a useful bone metabolic marker, especially when attempting to prevent fractures in patients with HBV.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

TO and TIc wrote the manuscript, analyzed the data and designed the study. HM, SM, YM, MY, SY, MK, TH, HY, TIk, OM, YK, YN, NT and KN collected the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. KN and NT confirm the authenticity of all the raw. data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center (approval no. H30-031). Informed consent was obtained from each patient included in the study, and the patients were guaranteed the right to leave the study if they desired.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Papatheodoridis G, Buti M, Cornberg M, Janssen H, Mutimer D, Pol S and Raimondo G: EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 57:167–185. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Raffetti E, Fattovich G and Donato F: Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in untreated subjects with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Int. 36:1239–1251. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Lampertico P, Agarwal K, Berg T, Buti M, Janssen HLA, Papatheodoridis G, Zoulim F and Tacke F: EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 67:370–398. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Si J, Yu C, Guo Y, Bian Z, Qin C, Yang L, Chen Y, Yin L, Li H, Lan J, et al: Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and risk of chronic kidney disease: A population-based prospective cohort study of 0.5 million Chinese adults. BMC Med. 16(93)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Rouillard S and Lane NE: Hepatic osteodystrophy. Hepatology. 33:301–307. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Ehnert S, Aspera-Werz RH, Ruoß M, Dooley S, Hengstler JG, Nadalin S, Relja B, Badke A and Nussler AK: Hepatic osteodystrophy-molecular mechanisms proposed to favor its development. Int J Mol Sci. 20(2555)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Leslie WD, Bernstein CN and Leboff MS: American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Commitee. AGA technical review on osteoporosis in hepatic disorders. Gastroenterology. 125:941–966. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Chen CH, Lin CL and Kao CH: Association between chronic hepatitis B virus infection and risk of osteoporosis: A nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore). 94(e2276)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Baeg MK, Yoon SK, Ko SH, Han KD, Choi HJ, Bae SH, Choi JY and Choi MG: Males seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen are at risk of lower bone mineral density: The 2008-2010 Korea national health and nutrition examination surveys. Hepatol Int. 10:470–477. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Shimizu T, Arita K, Murota E, Hiratsuka S, Fujita R, Ishizu H, Asano T, Takahashi D, Takahata M and Iwasaki N: Effects after starting or switching from bisphosphonate to romosozumab or denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal patients. J Bone Miner Metab. 39:868–875. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Miller PD, Hochberg MC, Wehren LE, Ross PD and Wasnich RD: How useful are measures of BMD and bone turnover? Curr Med Res Opin. 21:545–554. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, Lim YS, Fung S, Marcellin P, Ahn SH, Izumi N, Chuang WL, Bae H, et al: 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 68:672–681. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Seto WK, Asahina Y, Brown TT, Peng CY, Stanciu C, Abdurakhmanov D, Tabak F, Nguyen TT, Chuang WL, Inokuma T, et al: Improved bone safety of tenofovir alafenamide compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate over 2 years in patients with chronic HBV infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, Jun 20, 2018 (Online ahead of print).

14 

Chan HL, Fung S, Seto WK, Chuang WL, Chen CY, Kim HJ, Hui AJ, Janssen HL, Chowdhury A, Tsang TY, et al: Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1:185–195. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Ogawa E, Nomura H, Nakamuta M, Furusyo N, Koyanagi T, Dohmen K, Ooho A, Satoh T, Kawano A, Kajiwara E, et al: Tenofovir alafenamide after switching from entecavir or nucleos(t)ide combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 40:1578–1589. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Notsumata K, Nomura Y, Tanaka A, Ueda T, Sanada T, Watanabe H and Toya D: Early changes in tubular dysfunction markers and phosphorus metabolism regulators as a result of switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate nucleoside analog therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients. Hepatol Res. 50:402–404. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Hagiwara S, Nishida N, Ida H, Ueshima K, Minami Y, Takita M, Komeda Y and Kudo M: Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide versus maintaining entecavir for chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 91:18040–1810. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Uchida Y, Nakao M, Tsuji S, Uemura H, Kouyama JI, Naiki K, Motoya D, Sugawara K, Nakayama N, Imai Y, et al: Significance of switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used to treat Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate. J Med Virol. 92:329–338. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Tamaki N, Kurosaki M, Nakanishi H, Itakura J, Inada K, Kirino S, Kirino S, Yamashita K, Osawa L, Sekiguchi S, et al: Comparison of medication adherence and satisfaction between entecavir and tenofovir alafenamide therapy in chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 92:1355–1358. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Shephard DA: The 1975 declaration of Helsinki and consent. Can Med Assoc J. 115:1191–1192. 1976.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 843:1–129. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H and Hishida A: Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 53:982–992. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Kashani KB, Frazee EN, Kukrálová L, Sarvottam K, Herasevich V, Young PM, Kashyap R and Lieske JC: Evaluating muscle mass by using markers of kidney function: Development of the sarcopenia index. Crit Care Med. 45:e23–e29. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Kim SW, Jung HW, Kim CH, Kim K, Chin HJ and Lee H: A new equation to estimate muscle mass from creatinine and cystatin C. PLoS One. 11(e0148495)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Spirlandeli AL, Dick-de-paula I, Zamarioli A, Jorgetti V, Ramalho LNZ, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Volpon JB, Jordão AA, Cunha FQ, Fukada SY and de Paula FJA: Hepatic osteodystrophy: The mechanism of bone loss in hepatocellular disease and the effects of pamidronate treatment. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 72:231–237. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Lv Y, Wang G, Xu W, Tao P, Lv X and Wang Y: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b is a marker of osteoclast number and volume in RAW 264.7 cells treated with receptor-activated nuclear κB ligand. Exp Ther Med. 9:143–146. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Ivaska KK, Gerdhem P, Väänänen HK, Akesson K and Obrant KJ: Bone turnover markers and prediction of fracture: A prospective follow-up study of 1040 elderly women for a mean of 9 years. J Bone Miner Res. 25:393–403. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Kasai H, Mori Y, Ose A, Shiraki M and Tanigawara Y: Prediction of fracture risk from early-stage bone markers in patients with osteoporosis treated with once-yearly administered zoledronic acid. J Clin Pharmacol. 61:606–613. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Wei MT, Le AK, Chang MS, Hsu H, Nguyen P, Zhang JQ, Wong C, Wong C, Cheung R and Nguyen MH: Antiviral therapy and the development of osteopenia/osteoporosis among Asians with chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 91:1288–1294. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Fung J, Seto W, Lai C and Yuen M: Extrahepatic effects of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues in chronic hepatitis B treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 29:428–434. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2022
Volume 16 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Okamura T, Ichikawa T, Miyaaki H, Miuma S, Motoyoshi Y, Yamashima M, Yamamichi S, Koike M, Nakano Y, Honda T, Honda T, et al: Change in tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels, a marker of bone metabolism, in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir alafenamide. Biomed Rep 16: 6, 2022
APA
Okamura, T., Ichikawa, T., Miyaaki, H., Miuma, S., Motoyoshi, Y., Yamashima, M. ... Nakao, K. (2022). Change in tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels, a marker of bone metabolism, in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir alafenamide. Biomedical Reports, 16, 6. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1489
MLA
Okamura, T., Ichikawa, T., Miyaaki, H., Miuma, S., Motoyoshi, Y., Yamashima, M., Yamamichi, S., Koike, M., Nakano, Y., Honda, T., Yajima, H., Miyazaki, O., Kuribayashi, Y., Ikeda, T., Taura, N., Nakao, K."Change in tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels, a marker of bone metabolism, in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir alafenamide". Biomedical Reports 16.1 (2022): 6.
Chicago
Okamura, T., Ichikawa, T., Miyaaki, H., Miuma, S., Motoyoshi, Y., Yamashima, M., Yamamichi, S., Koike, M., Nakano, Y., Honda, T., Yajima, H., Miyazaki, O., Kuribayashi, Y., Ikeda, T., Taura, N., Nakao, K."Change in tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b levels, a marker of bone metabolism, in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir alafenamide". Biomedical Reports 16, no. 1 (2022): 6. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1489